Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 11, 2012

Home > 2007 > JuneChristianity Today, June, 2007
Sub-biblical Transformation
Organization-speak threatens to blind us to the church's unique glory.




Transformation is urged or promised wherever we turn these days—transformation of the church, of the culture, and of the world. But the literature of transformation—abundant in print and on the Web—is mostly evidence that American evangelicalism is being paganized.



One example came through our offices recently. The book, published by a leading evangelical house, comes with endorsements from no fewer than nine nationally recognized evangelical leaders. It is "about churches that have the courage to embrace change and to confront adaptive issues head on," called "transforming churches." The book is "firmly rooted in solid research" and introduces readers to the "Healthy Church Index," which tells them about "the five key indicators of church health."

The book is noticeably deficient in Scripture, especially the New Testament, as if the divinely inspired writings are not something we should be rooted in when we think about transformation.

And the five key indicators? (1) Church members should be "experiencing real life change." (2) The church should have "a clear sense of mission" and a "compelling vision." (3) The church must "embrace change" to fulfill its mission. (4) Leaders should be "effectively … mentoring and mobilizing" members for ministry. (5) The church should be "effective in transforming" the local area.

Such vague, trendy organization-speak is not unbiblical: a lot of the advice is sound, as far as it goes. But it is sub-biblical. The book—like so many others in its genre—is rooted more in modern social psychology than in the Bible's spiritual realities: "Christ in you, the hope of glory" (Col. 1:27).

Transformation is, in fact, a word used sparingly in the New Testament—only three times (in the English Standard Version). None of the verses have to do with changing the culture or the world. Though speaking to the church, they address it as a spiritual institution. One verse says our bodies will be transformed into glorious bodies someday (Phil. 3:21). Another is the well-known injunction of Paul to "be transformed by the renewal of your minds" (Rom. 12:2).

In the third, Paul describes the specific means and nature of our change: "And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another" (2 Cor. 3:18).

Biblical transformation of the church focuses not on social dynamics of corporate life—on mission statements, adaptive change, or mobilizing members. Such organizational principles can help any social organism, Christian or not. But to focus on them is to major in minors.

In our managerial age, we instinctively look to "leadership principles" and "keys to effectiveness" to "master" dysfunctional congregations. Some of this arises from a sincere desire to help the church be the church. Yet some of it is pure hubris and vain imagination, thinking that with organization-speak we can transform the church. Worse still, organization-speak has a way of deafening our ears to the unique language of Scripture. Only that language can open our eyes to see "the glory of the Lord," the one reality that transforms us into Christ's image "from one degree of glory to another."

As long as our movement remains fascinated with social psychology, our churches will remain little more than clanging cymbals. The world is not longing to see more people conformed to the image of organizational man, but to see people transformed into the image of "the man Christ Jesus" (1 Tim. 2:5).





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 21 comments

Jason

June 21, 2007  6:40am

The author has insight into some real issues in churches and Christian organizations, but I know first hand of several churches that might speak with this lingo and these churches really are seeing biblical transformation taking place in peoples' lives. When I read the list of indicators, they resonate with me on a very biblical level. I realize a basis for concern, but from the depths, my spirit cries "YES!" to these indicators. There are too many churches with "right theology" but no fruit to show for it. So the author is correct - these indicators (like anything else) must be grounded in the right foundation.

Kerry E. Southorn

June 20, 2007  2:38pm

The burden of proof has shifted in our churches. At one time, the burden of proof was upon those who wanted change, "We've always done it this way", was the accepted mode of thinking. Today the burden is on those who want to conserve the things they cherish. What is new is automatically considered superior--without being weighed or considered. The article goes straight to the quick on this malady. We shouldn't blindly preserve traditions that have outlasted their overrated usefulness, but neither should we grasp every lame sham of novelty which the "polyanna church movement" promotes.

Mike Kachura

June 14, 2007  9:00am

There is a convenient but dangerous mode of thinking (and preaching) in evangelical circles, that as long as you attach a verse to substantiate whatever you are saying, it is 'biblical' (and, I suppose, the more verses you include, the more 'biblical' you are). I say 'convenient' because you never have to do the hard work beyond that; 'dangerous' because it is so projective and perhaps the 'sub-cause' of much strife and confusion in the church. You only have to see what you are looking for. Such is the flavor of this article. The irony of this article is that the author's criticism of "sub-biblical" (whatever that is) is just the opposite of what I found: Ford's premise is based on a strong biblical world-life view (I read the book) and the research is interpreted accordingly. Read the book and decide for yourself. Keep in mind how infrequently Jesus quoted scripture and how often he used the social context (parables) to illustrate Truth and make it relevant.

Michele in Washington

June 14, 2007  12:03am

I had read Transforming Church by Kevin Ford before I read this editorial. Although the writer of the editorial does mention Rom. 12:2, I believe he should have quoted more of the verse: Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is - his good, pleasing, and perfect will. (NIV) Transforming Church is very much about asking what God's will is for a church, especially regarding those who are outside the walls far from God. As the church is made up of humans, there are unhealthy, worldly attitudes, especially consumerism that have crept in. Churches are dying while trying to appease member wants. Members have forgotten Christ's love for those outside the church. I believe Transforming Church is an important book to help ask the question - who is outside the walls and not getting connected to God and how can the believers obey God to reach them? Read the book.

Trevor

June 13, 2007  1:25pm

The American church is either declining or dying. For decades it’s been growing only its irrelevance. Soon it will be relegated to the status of churches all over Europe. I cannot spend anytime reading my bible without seeing the message of transformation. What begins with life transformation leads to community and cultural transformation. But, most churches are still having a debate over contemporary versus traditional worship services or whether or not a book (that is not intended to be bible study) has enough scripture in it. If the book was full of scripture, there would have been an editorial about the misuse of scripture. Meanwhile, most in my generation are deciding against church. We are masters of focusing on minors as though they were major- this book is not a reflection of that. It’s a tool for churches that need help to reach people with the transforming message of Jesus. I admire any pastor or leader that has a desire to grow a healthy church.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com