Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 12, 2012

Home > 2007 > December (Web-only)Christianity Today, December (Web-only), 2007
Excerpt
Hark! The Herald Angels Sing: From Wesley to Our Hymnals
At least four people brought the now-inviolable hymn to its current form.




Hark! the herald angels sing
Glory to the newborn King;
Peace on earth and mercy mild,
God and sinners reconciled:
Joyful all ye nations rise,
Join the triumph of the skies,
With the angelic host proclaim,
Christ is born in Bethlehem:
Hark! the herald angels sing
Glory to the newborn King.
Christ, by highest heaven adored,
Christ, the everlasting Lord,
Late in time behold him come,
Offspring of a virgin's womb!
Veiled in flesh the Godhead see,
Hail the incarnate Deity!
Pleased as man with men to dwell,
Jesus, our Emmanuel:
Hark! the herald angels sing
Glory to the newborn King.
Hail the heaven-born Prince of Peace!
Hail the Sun of Righteousness!
Light and life to all he brings,
Risen with healing in his wings;
Mild, he lays his glory by,
Born that man no more may die,
Born to raise the sons of earth,
Born to give them second birth:
Hark! the herald angels sing
Glory to the newborn King.
Words: Charles Wesley (1707-88), George Whitfield (1714-70),
Martin Madan (1726-90) and William Hayman Cummings (1831-1915) Music: Mendelssohn, from a chorus by Felix Mendelssohn-Bartholdy (1809-47), adapted by William Hayman Cummings

The carol we now know as "Hark! the herald angels sing" did not start life as such, and required at least four people to bring it to its current form. Wesley's original, written as a Christmas Day hymn and first published in 1739, is made up of ten four-line verses, rather than the longer eight-line verses with refrain which we have now.

It is interesting to note that in the original version of Wesley's, the heavens ring with the phrase "Glory to the King of kings," echoing Luke's "Glory to God in the highest heaven."

George Whitfield, who had been a student with Wesley, changed this to "Glory to the newborn King" in 1753. His fairly revolutionary Calvinist position was not compatible with Wesley's gentler reforming approach, which eventually bore fruit in the Methodist movement that he and his brother John inspired, Whitfield maintained the four-line verses of Wesley's original, but changed the angels' emphasis: "Glory to the newborn King" means something slightly but significantly different from "Glory to the King of kings." In the Gospel account, the angels praise God, whereas in "Hark! the herald angels sing," they are inaccurately described as praising Jesus. Furthermore, Luke does not say that the angels "sing," and so it may well be that this reinterpretation by Whitfield has emphasized the popular but unscriptural picture of angels singing the Gloria. ("While shepherds watched" also implies that they sang.)

Whitfield also cut the final verses, which are now largely forgotten:

Come, desire of nations, come,
Fix in us thy humble home;
Rise, the woman's conquering seed,
Bruise in us the serpent's head.
Now display thy saving power,
Ruin'd nature now restore;
Now in mystic union join
Thine to ours, and ours to thine.
Adam's likeness, Lord, efface,
Stamp thy image in its place.
Second Adam from above,
Reinstate us in thy love.
Let us thee, though lost, regain,
Thee, the life, the inner man:
O, to all thyself impart,
Form'd in each believing heart.

There is some real theological insight in these neglected verses. First of all we notice the Advent antiphon "Come, desire of nations, come," followed by a reference to the Fall, with the serpent bruising the heel of humanity and Adam bruising its head (Genesis 3:15). Wesley cleverly alters the meaning, asking that the serpent in us (sin) should be bruised (defeated) by Christ, the second Adam, who reinstates us as beloved sons and daughters of God. In the restoration of sinful humanity to a state of grace through the incarnation of Christ, the joining of divine and human nature is also achieved. Consequently, that which was lost (salvation) is gained and a new life is granted to all believers.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 11 comments

Rita

December 17, 2007  12:07pm

I like O Holy Night. I can relate to the words "Long lay the world in sin and error pining, 'til He appeared, and the soul felt its worth." Beautifully dramatic music, too.

Scott

December 17, 2007  10:23am

I'm curious as to why Whitfield is faulted for altering the lyric to read "Glory to the newborn King." Is there some question as to whether Christ should receive glory or whether Christ is a King or whether glory to Christ is anything other than glory to God? To lay this off on Whitefield's Calvinism is surely a mistake. In fact, to consider the change a liability to the hymn is altogether odd.

Lynn

December 15, 2007  11:56pm

I love the song "O Holy Night". The words are phenomenal, when you think of the chorus alone, "Fall on your knees. O hear the angel voices", how can you not be in awe of the power and beauty of Christ's birth.

H. D. Schmidt

December 15, 2007  9:53am

Excellent story! Not being a musician, there is nothing more insulting to the author of a peace of music and irritating to me when so many are being arranged! My conclusion is that those arrangers are not able to produce their own, hence they wish to sort of prove it to others, as they arrange. I would not be surprised that arrangers keep arranging previous arranged music. Yes, to the real core of the way Jesus entered this sinful planet. Yes, the conception story is always read. Yes, Jesus in the manger, of course. So, here is my question: Why did God choose 9 month of pregnancy? One never hears as to the message God sent along with it! Yes, telling the world that every unborn is a human being from conception and therefore ruling that abortion is murder. Yet, many Christian pulpits never ever condemn abortion, while preaching their hearts out telling their listeners that Jesus showed humility while "choosing" to be borne in a mention. The 9 months get zero for Jesus' humility!

Gregg

December 14, 2007  6:04pm

My favorite Christmas song is "Carol of the Bells". Not that everyone can sing it, but it's beautiful to listen too. I also like, "We Three Kings", "I Saw Three Ships", and "I Heard the Bells on Christmas Day". There are so many good songs out there!

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com