Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
July 4, 2009
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2007 > October (Web-only)Christianity Today, October (Web-only), 2007  |   |  
Speaking Out
The Peacemaking Process
A call to evangelicals to respond to a significant Muslim overture.



ADVERTISEMENT

Muslim leaders who represent a broad spectrum of communities around the world have issued an open letter inviting Christians to work toward peace based on core teachings in our respective faiths: the unity of God, love of him, and love of neighbor.

The Bible not only instructs us to be witnesses (Acts 1:8) but also to be peacemakers as part of our witness (Rom. 12:18). This is the most important reason we have to take the letter seriously. My experience has been that Muslims want to engage with evangelicals—even on the hard issues—if we start where we agree. The Muslim leaders who wrote and signed "A Common Word Between Us and You" have taken the initiative in doing just that.

The invitation's importance also lies in the breadth and influence of its 138 signers. Coordinated by the Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute of Islamic Thought in Jordan, the letter includes a large number of Grand Muftis, Fiqh Council members, and others responsible for Islamic law and its interpretation. The major branches of Sunni, Shi'ite, and Sufi Islam are represented. Particularly significant is the inclusion of the whole spectrum of positions—not only liberals, but the president and a dean of the most prestigious Sunni institution, Al-Azhar University in Cairo, and also Shi'ite Ayatollahs and even the peaceful Islamist Salim Falahat, the director-general of the Muslim Brotherhood in Jordan (militant members from another branch of the Muslim Brotherhood in Saudi Arabia indoctrinated some of the 9/11 terrorists). Major university professors such as Seyyed Hossein Nasr and broadcasters who influence youth and public opinion also signed. Never before in modern times has such a "Who's Who of the Muslim World" signed such a document.

While recognizing genuine differences in our beliefs, the invitation seeks to base our relationship on identifiable common ground in our sacred texts rather than on undocumented platitudes. As such, it goes beyond the open letter from 38 Muslim leaders to the Pope a year ago (see "Can We Dialogue with Islam?"), which based the need for dialogue more on what it cited as misunderstandings of Islam.

The Muslim leaders derived their statements on the Christian basis for dialogue from Jesus' response to a scribe's question about the first commandment:

"Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is One. And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength." This is the first commandment. And the second, like it, is this: "You shall love your neighbor as yourself." There is no other commandment greater than these (Mark 12:29-31, quoting from Deut. 6:4-5; Lev. 19:18).

The Muslim basis for belief in one God—and the injunction to cite this as a source of common ground with Jews and Christians—is noted in the Qur'an:

Come to a common word between us and you: that we shall worship none but God, and that we should ascribe no partner to him, and that none of us shall take others for lords beside God (3:64).

The open letter significantly affirms that "justice and freedom of religion are a crucial part of love of the neighbor."

Another reason for the importance of the invitation, as the Muslim letter notes, is that Christians represent over one third of the world's population and Muslims over one fifth, and thus combine to be half of the people on the globe. Consequently, our relationship has a tremendous impact on the possibility of peace in the world.

The invitation is especially important to evangelicals—although they are not specifically included in the long list of Roman Catholic, Orthodox, and mainline Protestant leaders addressed—because evangelicals, including Pentecostals, are the fastest growing segment of the church and are the most in contact with Muslims around the world. Also, in past consultations and in more recent talks following the October 13 letter, Muslim leaders have repeatedly expressed a special interest in interacting with evangelicals to members of the Yale Reconciliation Program and others.





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 21 comments.See all comments
Ephrem Hagos   Posted: October 30, 2007 9:59 AM
If both Christians and Muslims, through but not limited to their respective Scriptures (John 5: 39-40), come to know personally and firsthand exactly who Jesus Christ is, wholly apart from all the claims and counter-claims about Him, peace will surely prevail among us. I know that it is possible! May the LORD help us!

Khalil Ullah   Posted: October 28, 2007 11:12 PM
In response to Dr. Woodbury's appeal to sign the response--I read the statement from the Yale group. As one who ministers to Muslims there were two things that initially came to me which preclude me from being able to conscientiously sign this: 1-Muslims do not consider loving God and others as their primary duty. This is yet another good example of Muslims "Christianizing" their language in order to persuade us. I highly recommend all to read S.W. Koelle's, "Mohammed and Mohammedanism" (www.muhammadanism.org). For that matter, all one has to do is read the Koran and spend time with Muslims. Obeying what they believe to be God's commands is obligatory and has nothing to do with love. 2-The use of "Prophet" prior to Muhammad's name. This implies to the Muslim, whether we like it or not, that we Christians respect Muhammad as a prophet. Why not use "the Prophet of Islam" as have done missionaries like Temple Gairdner? In this way there is no compromise of one's conscience.

vbranch   Posted: October 27, 2007 9:58 PM
Wise as serpents / Harmless as doves ??? “… we are determined to continue our efforts to remove possible sources of difference and thus to contribute to assure the peace of Europe.” (Signed) A. Hitler (Signed) Neville Chamberlain, September 30, 1938. Chamberlain upon his return to England after the above signing: “My good friends, this is the second time in our history that there has come back from Germany to Downing Street peace with honour. I believe it is peace for our time. We thank you from the bottom of our hearts. And now I recommend you to go home and sleep quietly in your beds.” On the contrary, let us Christians wake up! "The common word between us and you" is not the "God" and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ; Allah has no children. Ask any Muslim. This difference is insurmountable. Should we then cry "peace, peace when there is no peace"?

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Church Office Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com