The Crisis of Modern Fundamentalism
There would be no need for a new evangelical movement without the liberal decline of Protestant theology during the 19th and early 20th centuries. But eminent evangelical theologian Carl Henry expected fallen humans to doubt the Bible's authority. "What concerns me more is that we have needlessly invited criticism and even ridicule, by a tendency in some quarters to parade secondary and sometimes even obscure aspects of our positions as necessary frontal phases of our view." This was The Uneasy Conscience of Modern Fundamentalism (1947).
Fundamentalism is still with us, though you won't hear many evangelicals talk about it. Not so with the fundamentalists, who worry about a growing number within their ranks who have wandered toward evangelicalism. A 2005 survey released on the popular fundamentalist blog SharperIron "revealed that many in the newest generation of fundamentalist leadership were still committed to fundamentalist theology but uncomfortable with some of the more extreme positions on secondary separation, association, worship music, extra-biblical standards, and other issues." A resolution approved during the 2004 annual meeting of the Fundamental Baptist Fellowship International (FBFI) revealed the concern of fundamentalist leaders. They urged "young men to reject any temptation to lower biblical standards in order to gain acceptance of those in the world or among theologically accommodating Christian movements." According to Tim Baylor, reared in fundamentalism but now attending an evangelical seminary, "Militancy is at an all-time-low in Fundamentalism, and Fundamentalists are looking for someone to blame."
Who worries today's fundamentalist leaders? According to the FBFI's 2005 resolutions, "Rick Warren and his Purpose Driven Life movement represents an incomplete gospel, a negligent carelessness in the use of Scripture paraphrases, extreme pragmatism, and a disdain for biblical separatism." Another resolution targeted John Piper. "The great popularity of Piper's writings, especially among younger fundamentalists requires that FBFI warn its members concerning Piper's non-separatist position and, for those who read his works, to do so with careful discernment." It's not like Piper is unfamiliar with second-degree separation, when fundamentalists separate from Christians who do not separate from other Christians with poor theology. Piper's father once served on the board of Bob Jones University.
The difference between evangelicals and fundamentalists hasn't been theology, though some fundamentalists would refuse to compromise on dispensationalism, for example. Fundamentalists have a strategy problem: Do they clamp down on these youngsters, risking a deeper generation gap? Or do they reconsider strict separation and cultural isolation? By choosing the latter, they may save their youth and lose their cause.
Lectures Worth Noting (Even Attending)
N.T. Wright at Asbury Seminary
When: November 1314, 2007
Where: Estes Chapel at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky
Cost: Free
Subject: The bishop of Durham will deliver two lectures, "Use of Scripture in Contemporary Political Discourse" and "God Is Public? Biblical Faith in Tomorrow's World." He will also participate in a colloquium, "Acts and the Contemporary Challenge of the Gospel."
What They're Saying: Wright has previously delivered provocative comments on foreign policy, saving pointed criticism for Western leaders. See, for example, his November 2006 address, "Where is God in the 'War on Terror'?" Wright said, "As the terrorist activities of a very small number have grown in importance, the western powers have played into their hands by reacting, as I've said, in immature and counter-productive ways. Every bomb dropped has proved to be another Al-Qaeda recruiting agent, just as several of us were saying four years ago." Watch to see if Wright responds to criticism from Americans such as Joseph Loconte.
The Latest in Movie News, May 23, 2013

God Among the Roma

Grieving with the Good Friday God

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).












Comments
Displaying 13 of 18 comments
See all comments
Ephrem Hagos
Return to the "solid tradition" of the teaching of Jesus Christ within a community of seekers for the truth will quickly expose contemporary Christian teaching for what it is, i.e., nothing less than counterfeit, theological reinvention. The sooner this happens the better!
Carrie
My biggest concern--which relates to both evangelicals and fundamentalists (I'm an evangelical)--is cultural captivity to the ethos of marketing Christ. We've just been through yet another evangelism training at church where we've been taught to give our personal testimonies as part of sharing the gospel ... on the assumption that our personal testimony will be part of the appeal of the Gospel. Well, I called on Christ as a 12-year-old who felt personally desperate due, in part, to a chronic illness. Now I'm 50, sicker, and while I usually am strong enough to serve others, I wouldn't say that God has transformed my life in a way that would tend to sell Christianity to anyone else (with the possible exception of other people with the same illness). Sometimes, as Mother Teresa's personal papers remind us, Christianity is just about following and knowing that heaven is ahead.
scott
it is a sad day when Rick Warren is made Joel Osteen's bed-fellow. no matter what you think of his theology/philosophy, Warren at least has some merit as a seminary-educated, intrepid church-planter. i know that God is perfectly capable of using uneducated men to preach the gospel and shepherd His church, but Osteen's lack of training is particularly astounding - which makes his influence all the more questionable (read the history of his father's church). as for fundamentalists condemning godly men like Piper, nothing should be tolerated less - at least until they repent of one of their progenitor's similar sins (if we grant them their understanding of separation); but for some reason, none of them care to discuss the personal ecumenism of W.B. Riley.