Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 13, 2012

Home > 2008 > January (Web-only)Christianity Today, January (Web-only), 2008
Theology in the News
Obama's Social Contract
Abortion and the candidate's commitment to freedom and equality.




Did you receive an e-mail that claimed Sen. Barack Obama was a closet Muslim? I did. And I deleted it without a second thought. Obama has publicly proclaimed his Christian faith on many occasions. Yet it appears that the viral e-mail campaign has achieved its desired effect. So this week Obama made himself available to Christianity Today and other religious media to denounce the e-mails and profess his faith in Jesus Christ.

Sarah Pulliam and Ted Olsen, who conducted the brief interview for CT, took the opportunity to ask Obama about his views on abortion. The 35th anniversary of Roe v. Wade on January 22 has triggered a spate of media critiques of abortion in America. Movies take up the topic. A recent report shared the good news about an ongoing drop in the abortion rate, now at its lowest point since the year after Roe.

Obama did not back off his pro-choice views in the CT interview. "I think [abortions] need to be made in consultation with doctors, they have to be prayed upon, or people have to be consulting their conscience on it," he said. "I think we have to keep that decision-making with the person themselves." He did, however, say that he supports restricting third-trimester abortions. But it's hard to know if he's serious, since he requires an exception for the health of the mother, a notorious loophole that would effectively negate the type of ban signed by President Bush in 2003.

More insightful was a statement his campaign released on the Roe anniversary. Obama boasted about being the only candidate who raised money to defeat South Dakota's ban on abortion. He recalled speaking out against pro-life protesters in the Chicago suburbs. And he echoed an important foundational assumption with theological implications.

"But we also know that Roe v. Wade is about more than a woman's right to choose; it's about equality," Obama said. "It's about whether our daughters are going to have the same opportunities as our sons. And so to truly honor that decision, we need to update the social contract so that women can free themselves, and their children, from violent relationships; so that a mom can stay home with a sick child without getting a pink slip; so that she can go to work knowing that there's affordable, quality childcare for her children; and so that the American dream is within reach for every family in this country."

There's a lot here to digest. But the emphasis on freedom and equality stands out. The concepts pepper every politician's speech, given their central roles in the American story. If freedom was the goal of the Revolution, then the Civil War and civil rights movement sought equality, an unfilled promise from the Declaration of Independence. Like anything else, freedom and equality can become pawns in modern-day political chess. If Obama can trace his pro-choice views back to the American statement of faith, so can pro-life professor Robert George.

"Ours is a nation, as Lincoln said, 'conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal,'" the Princeton University professor told blogger Justin Taylor. "Our country has never perfectly lived up to its high ideals, but our ideals are the right ideals and they are worth struggling to live up to. Our history shows that we are a people who can live with grave injustices for only so long. Just as we abolished slavery and eventually overthrew segregation and Jim Crow in order to honor the dignity and rights of our brothers and sisters of African descent, we will eventually restore to our tiniest and most vulnerable brothers and sisters the protection they, as members of the human family, deserve."





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 54 comments

David

February 08, 2008  8:59am

Liz: It IS "notorious" because that language has been twisted to mean even the trivialest inconvenience. To be effective, it needs to be re-phrased as "physical life of the mother" (so the question becomes: Is THAT what Senator Obama means?).

Dave

February 07, 2008  2:57pm

If your only basis for a vote is what the candidates stand on the killing of children is then you can not support any candidate that supports war. Over 81,000 civilian non combatants dead in the last 3 years of war. Half are women and children. So the same argurement prohibits you from voting for any Republican candidate either.

Cami G

February 06, 2008  3:54pm

I totally agree, with what it was said above. I wished people will research more than to believe what the media says. He would say anything to win this campain. I hope people will realize that. He will be sworn in to the office on the Koran!!! That's what he said!!! HELLO!!!!!!!!!

Grandpa

February 04, 2008  5:37pm

Being raised in any religious persuasion does not mean one cannot come to Christ. Perhaps Mr Obama has, perhaps he hasn't. God knows. If Mr Obama does not reject abortion and homosexuality outright then the chances are he hasn't. But who are we to tell. God knows. Perhaps Mr Obama is still in the process of being refined by the Lord. Who isn't ? If it's a matter of who to vote for, then Christians should set aside their own opinions and prayerfully seek God's opinion and direction. The problem is, we think our interpretations are right. There is a way that seemth right unto a man, but the ways thereof are the ways of death. Proverbs 16:25

Edith Whitford

February 04, 2008  2:41pm

Very insightful at this critical time of decision. The writer was totally honest, gracious, yet forthright with Biblical truths. I take my position with Mike, for I could never find a reason for an innocent baby, (unless possibly a pregnancy through rape from a vile, murderous person), that would qualify a totally innocent baby to be killed. I cannot buy into the reasoning of Fred in believing a premature birth makes him/her of lesser value than a full-time birth in God's eyes. Many "premies" live through the early birth, so that would not be termed as "lasting harm" as stated in Exodus 21:22. If the child died, then it would be a 'lasting harm', so the punishment would be 'life for life'. I stand to be corrected as I have not done proper sturdy on this. If God knows us even before we are born, and is no respecter of persons, I believe those very much alive little fetus' within their Mommie's womb, are in God's great heart of love. I believe they posses an Eternal spirit. Edith

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com