Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 8, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2009 > MayChristianity Today, May, 2009  |   |  
Keeping Holy Ground Holy
A new survey suggests that seekers are not looking for user-friendly, mall-like buildings.



ADVERTISEMENT

In full view of drivers whizzing by on Interstate 75 near Atlanta, the Church of the Apostles is majestic, stately, and soaring. It's also daring: the building looks unmistakably and instantly like a church.

This decade-old neo-Gothic Anglican megachurch is layered with stone walls, a thick tower that hoists a cross, and half-oval windows in the shape universally known as "church window." While its original building plan called for theater seating—the sanctuary seats about 3,000—the church instead opted for pews.

"When we built it, there was a lot of movement towards the warehouse look, with black ceilings," says Dana Blackwood, Church of the Apostles' director of facilities. "The church leadership understood that that look was going to fade. People wanted to have a sense of tradition, something that looked like a church."

The Church of the Apostles suggests a new trend in church design, one in which some congregations are rejecting the slimmed-down, boxy buildings of the last half-century and embracing a look some would call antiquated, following the ancient-future dictum that old is the new new.

"The average person is not at all repelled by Gothic or Romanesque architecture," says Robert Jaeger, executive director of Partners for Sacred Places, a nondenominational nonprofit that preserves and renews historic church buildings in the U.S. "The average person finds the symbolism and the craftsmanship compelling, beautiful, and comforting."

"There's a desire out there to connect with something ancient, something transcendent," says Ed Stetzer, director of LifeWay Research and author of Lost and Found: The Younger Unchurched and the Churches That Reach Them. "There's a hunger to move beyond a bland evangelicalism into something with more historic roots."

Last year, a LifeWay survey commissioned by the Cornerstone Knowledge

Network found that unchurched adults prefer Gothic church buildings to utilitarian ones, challenging the conventional wisdom that medieval-looking churches feel out-of-touch and stuffy to seekers. LifeWay showed over 1,600 unchurched adults four pictures of church buildings, ranging from mall-like to Gothic. The majority preferred the most ornate church.

"The study probably tells us that the appearance of a traditional church might not be the turnoff that people assumed in the seeker age," Stetzer says.

Of course, Stetzer also notes that in North America and Europe, the congregations with the oldest buildings are the ones struggling the most to retain members. There's a difference between admiring a building from the street and going inside to connect with a congregation.

"Buildings don't reach people, people reach people," says Stetzer. "We can't tell from the survey if there's a connection between the two."

"I think we need to be cautious about an excessive focus on buildings," adds Gerardo Marti, a sociologist at Davidson University. Marti studied Los Angeles's innovative Mosaic community for his book A Mosaic of Believers: Diversity and Innovation in a Multiethnic Church. "These discussions [about architecture] often lead us away from a core insight: that ministry is about how we can actualize God's love through community."

Marti says that even in non-churchlike settings, most leaders carefully consider how the space can be set apart as sacred. He recalls Mosaic's decision in 1998 to move its Sunday evening service to a downtown nightclub.

 "When Mosaic first stepped into the nightclub, its leaders asked, 'Can we make this into a church?'"Marti recalls. "There was a lot of prayer about how to arrange the space so that it evoked worship. Even in the most boxlike space, every church leader I've talked to still asks, 'How do we make this a place of worship?'"

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 12 comments.See all comments
Steve Skeete   Posted: June 02, 2009 9:46 AM
I am not into buildings necessarily, but I would admit, that if I had to choose to "worship" in either a gymnasium or a cathedral, the sense of awe and grandeur would draw me to the cathedral. Having said that, I hasten to add that the "Church" is not the building no matter how plain or how stately. The church is people wherever they may meet at any particular time. True worshippers, Jesus said, worship "in spirit and in truth". Since most "worshippers" spend most of their time outside the building, I would prefer to see them prepared to be "salt and light", than made comfortable for two or three hours a week. That is unless, of course, another survey shows that the more comfortable we make "worshippers" the more light and salt they take when they leave the building.

Roger G   Posted: June 02, 2009 8:21 AM
In the New Testament, the word which we translate as "church" is ekklesia, which literally means "gathering", and there's nothing sacred about it. In Acts 19:32, ekklesia is the word used to describe the gathered rioters who were aiming to drive Paul out of Ephesus! So isn't it unbiblical to describe a building as sacred? In the end, what makes a group of Christians a church is not how beautiful or ugly is the building that they meet in, but whether the Word of God is faithfully preached & the Sacraments properly administered (Article XIX).

MP   Posted: June 01, 2009 9:43 PM
Bravo for an timely and insightful essay! This is not a new thing, contrary to the survey results. We have been made for God, and our hearts will remain restless until they find their rest in Him. How can we discern the beauty of God's holy love in our midst when a place set apart for praise and adoration is ugly? The mega church has prided itself on stripping its buildings and spaces of all signs and symbols related to Christianity. What they have done, however, is to srip their lives of any transcendent end to know, delight in, and love; in other words, the Triune God. What is left is a human organization run by people and for people by the choice and use of immanent will to power. No wonder younger people are turned off by this stuff! Can you blame them?

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com