Local Is Beautiful
Reduce fossil fuel consumption now, or our grandchildren will suffer." That's the old wisdom, and it has its critics. Some think environmentalists exaggerate; Bill McKibben believes they don't go nearly far enough. Global catastrophe, he says, is already here. The earth has changed so radically that it needs a new name: he suggests Eaarth.
McKibben has been dubbed "probably the nation's leading environmentalist" (The Boston Globe) and "the world's best green journalist" (Time). He is also a churchgoing, Sunday-school-teaching Methodist who has written that church people should be at the fore of the environmental movement, because Christianity teaches social justice, creation care, and selfless concern for others (The Christian Century).
In his newest book, Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet (Times Books) , McKibben argues that "the earth has changed in profound ways, ways that have already taken us out of the sweet spot where humans so long thrived." For 10,000 years we bumped along quite nicely with 275 parts per million of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Then we started burning fossil fuels, and the CO2 level began to rise. Respected scientists now estimate that the maximum safe level is 350 parts per million. According to McKibben's website, 350.org, we are currently at 387.
The results are already devastating. If we were able to turn back the clock and reduce CO2 levels to 350ppm or lower, we would still have a thawed Arctic, acidified oceans, changed rainfall patterns, and higher temperatures. "We're not … going to get back the planet we used to have, the one on which our civilization developed," McKibben writes."We're like the guy who ate steak for dinner every night and let his cholesterol top 300 and had the heart attack. Now he dines on Lipitor and walks on the treadmill, but half his heart is dead tissue."
Despite his somber warnings, McKibben is no doomsday prophet. Unlike Frank Fenner, an Australian scientist who recently prophesied the extinction of mankind within 100 years, McKibben believes we can thrive on Eaarth, though not if we continue to make a god of economic growth. We can and should develop alternative energy sources, but there's no way we can afford the number of projects we would need in order to pursue our relentless rush to Bigger and Better.
McKibben's solution, by contrast, is Small and Local. Instead of hauling food around the world, we should foster family farms. Instead of constant flying and driving, we should keep in touch through the Internet. Instead of building giant centralized power plants, we should develop many local power sources. Instead of relying on the government for everything, we should strengthen our communities.
In this book, McKibben does not relate environmental concerns to biblical teachings, as he has done in articles online and in Harper's magazine. His recommendations, however, fit well with Scripture's respect for creation and concern for the poor, its scorn for riches and praise for contentment, and—underlying everything else—its requirement to love our neighbors as ourselves.

A Fractured and Beautiful Faith
Streaming This Weekend, May 24, 2013

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).













Comments
Displaying 13 of 16 comments
See all comments
E J
I loved this article! I think its themes are not discussed enough among Christians. I went to an Earth Day event in my city that was sponsored by a local church. Regular community members packed the room. Everyone was invited to church to hear a Christian scientist give a message entitled “Is God Green?” This biblically based message taught how God cares about people and how environmental problems are hurting people who are most venerable due to poverty and lack of economic and political power. These problems are occurring right now, not just when climate change reaches its apex. I think simplifying is a great strategy. Its better for the environment, and it allows us to have more money left over to help others. The event was a great way to show the secular world, that Christians care about the poor and the earth and it paved the way to give people an opportunity to be introduced to the life saving gospel of Christ. I hope this way of thinking becomes a trend!
A Hermit
Human beings, biologically, are from the earth. Water from the rivers and oceans flows in our veins; minerals from the earth become part of our bodies through the plants and animals we eat. We live in a finite world; our population and material consumption cannot continue to 'grow'. To greedily consume our resources and pollute our planet is to destroy ourselves. As there were false prophets in Israel, so there are false prophets today who extoll 'greed is good'; man's material needs will be met- not our GREED; and greed is SIN. There is solid scientific evidence that our climate change is not a product of 'natural cycles'. The news just a day or so ago said that demand for ethanol to fuel our affluence is driving up the price of food commodities, hurting the poor. We can CHOOSE to place humans over material profit; economic determinism is false.
Roger McKinney
“What would happen if millions of prosperous Christians chose instead to live more biblically, looking for ways to share Eaarth's dwindling resources with all?” Not much. Generating electricity produced most of the CO2, not driving trucks. And it wouldn’t stop global warming, which is caused by natural processes like cycles in sun activity that eventually reverse themselves, not CO2. And if Americans cut their consumption in half, millions of poor would starve to death because they depend on us to buy their products so they can have the income to buy food. American consumption does not deprive anyone of food; it enables them to buy food. It would be so nice if Christian authors would learn a tiny bit of economics before passing on their pop-Marxism as Christian dogma.