Theology

Harnessing the Power of Europe’s Migrant Churches

A seminary professor from Sierra Leone shares how African arrivals are changing the church in Belgium and the rest of the continent.

Worshippers at a Nigerian church in the United Kingdom having a moment of intense prayer.

Worshippers at a Nigerian church in the United Kingdom having a moment of intense prayer.

Christianity Today March 20, 2024
Gideon Mendel / Getty

Joseph Bosco Bangura is out to reshape how we think about migrant churches.

For more than 25 years, he has been exploring how new Christian movements open up opportunities to engage with and transform societies. Bangura’s research on the growing Pentecostal movement in his home country of Sierra Leone revealed both its popular appeal and the creative ways charismatic and Pentecostal churches have accommodated indigenous African religious traditions.

Now he’s turning his focus to the impact of migrant churches in Europe. Bangura, who teaches missiology at the Evangelical Theological Faculty (ETF) in Belgium and Protestant Theological University (PThU) in the Netherlands and also pastors a migrant church, spoke with CT about the opportunities and challenges facing migrant congregations in secularized European societies.

What motivated you to study migrant churches in Europe?

There is always a connection between people’s mobility and the spread of their faith. Any time the Jews migrated—in fact, it is from them that we have the term diaspora—something happened to their faith. The same was true in the early church. They didn’t go immediately; persecution brought about their dispersal. Migration inevitably coincides with the spread of the gospel. It widens the possibility of bringing new aspects of the faith to places where they were not initially known.

In Western Europe today, there is a greater awareness among indigenous [i.e., white European] churches of the missionary implications of migrant communities. What can they do for the configuration of the church in a secular Europe? They might be the lifeline for the survival of the faith in a secularized world.

Mission organizations are taking the presence of migrants seriously and are thinking about how to engage them. Harvey Kwiyani, a scholar from Malawi who has written extensively on mission and migration, is working for the Church Mission Society. Leita Ngoy, a native of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) who teaches in Germany, is a consultant for Bread for the World, helping German churches become more welcoming to migrants. The Bible Society for the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium) has appointed Samuel Ekpo, a Nigerian, as its relationship manager for migrant and international churches.

My own appointment as a professor of missiology at ETF, funded by a Dutch mission organization, and my teaching role at PThU also reflect what is happening. Westerners are realizing that if they want to contribute to the development of global Christianity, they must allow their own academic settings to reflect the diversity in God’s church.

Could you describe what your own congregation looks like?

As a pastor at Exceeding Grace Bible Church in Antwerp, Belgium, I shepherd migrants who want to share their faith. Our 70 attenders reflect a diversity of ethnicities. They are natives of the DRC, Chad, Ghana, Nigeria, and Cameroon. Many are naturalized Belgians. We are fully bilingual in English and French.

We may all be Africans in skin color, but the cultures are different. When we meet or make decisions, we have people representing each of those cultures, so as to present the view that in Christ we are one. We also have various Christian backgrounds—charismatic, evangelical, Catholic. We try to build bridges. It’s a work in progress.

Irrespective of the internal cultural differences, all of us face the same issues that migrants from everywhere face in Belgium: social integration, language, and being considered outsiders who don’t quite belong.

What is the history of migrant churches in Belgium?

As the former colonial power of the DRC, Belgium brought Congolese students to study at Belgian universities even before the DRC’s independence in 1960, intending to send them back as the political elite who would shape the country. But some did not go back. The first migrant church in Brussels was established in the 1980s with support from Campus Crusade for Christ. Belgium subsequently attracted other African migrants—such as Rwandans during the 1994 genocide or West Africans fleeing economic crisis in their home countries—because of its liberal policies for asylum seekers.

Migrant church leaders began to enter into various church organizations, such as the Belgian Evangelical Alliance. More recently, an association was formed to provide fellowship and encouragement for pastors of African and Caribbean origin. Especially in northern Belgium, there are migrant churches in almost all the cities, generally affiliated with local evangelical and Pentecostal associations. The presence of migrant churches has revived the whole concept of Protestant Christianity in this predominantly Catholic country.

What are the different types of churches you see in Belgium?

In my teaching, I describe four categories. There is the migrant church, defined on the basis of the church’s ethnic composition and its difference from the host community. There is the indigenous church, by contrast—although I very rarely hear my Flemish colleagues call their church indigenous. To them, it is just their home church.

Third, there are multicultural churches, where an indigenous church opens up its space to allow cultural fellowships within the church. You may have a white European pastor in charge, but there’s a Filipino fellowship that meets on Wednesday or an African fellowship on Friday. They do their own thing during the week and then all come together on Sunday. That is good, but it raises questions about when the multiculturality of the church will be represented in the leadership structure. When will people of color be able to speak other than on a mission Sunday? The whole vision is often undermined by the lack of diversity in the leadership structure itself.

Finally, there are international churches, which use English exclusively and attract primarily professionals related to NATO, the European Union, Western embassies, or major corporations. Since they are economically independent and able to support themselves, they do not prioritize integration with local Christian communities. The leadership is exclusively white. They too serve a specific group of people who came here as migrants, but because they came as diplomats or corporate elites in the high echelon of society, they are not called migrants.

Joseph Bosco Bangura teaching at the Evangelical Theological Faculty (ETF) in Belgium.Courtesy of Joseph Bosco Bangura
Joseph Bosco Bangura teaching at the Evangelical Theological Faculty (ETF) in Belgium.

Why is it so difficult for multicultural churches to have multicultural leadership?

The idea of having leadership that represents the church’s multiculturality is an excellent goal. I would like to think that such a church would be a good example of what we will experience in heaven. But getting there is quite complicated, with many issues to address.

About 20 years ago, the International Baptist Church in Antwerp was doing well when led by its European founders. When the church was transferred to African leadership, the number of Europeans slowly ebbed away due to concerns that the biblical teaching wasn’t theologically sound enough.

Currently, the whole question of migration is very polarizing in the political sphere. This affects the perception of normal Christians and therefore their ability to collaborate with each other.

Migrant churches are sometimes criticized for focusing only on people of their own ethnicity and keeping the body of Christ segregated. What are your thoughts about this critique?

In 2003, Jan Jongeneel argued that when communities of faith migrate, the initial step, especially with the first generation, is to look inward and meet the needs of members of that community. You must have a base from which to begin missions. We need to give new migrant churches some time to redefine their identity relative to their status in the new society.

The migrant churches are trying to address a missional need. It does not do justice to their cause if we focus on contrasts with other churches. Let’s look instead at how different types of churches can collaborate toward the goal of reaching Europe for Christ.

How do you encourage migrant Christians to integrate effectively with their surrounding culture?

In my church, we encourage families to have their children take an elective subject called PEGO—Protestant evangelical religious education—taught in primary and secondary schools across Belgium. It gives them an idea of how Protestants in Belgium think about faith. Increasingly, people who look like me are teaching this subject. In April, I will be holding a seminar for 400 teachers, talking about African religiosity and how it can help to revitalize religious education in schools. This is an important opening.

I also encourage my African colleagues to participate in local evangelical or Pentecostal fellowships. We may not agree on everything, but we are a minority and cannot afford to stay alone. We should be coming together to share resources and encourage each other. This could help mission not only in Belgium but also from Belgium to the countries we come from. For instance, if a local Belgian church wants to do missions in Sierra Leone, I can provide helpful insights before they get to the mission field.

How do you see the secularity of Belgian culture affecting the second generation of African migrants?

In 2020, I published a chapter reflecting on this issue. Migrant children do not always appreciate the spirituality of their parents. They are also dealing with an identity crisis. Their parents do not consider them Africans at home, but they are considered Africans at school. Collaborating with indigenous churches can help to address some of their needs and give them an opportunity to make a decision for Christ.

First-generation migrant parents are often unable to understand the challenges faced by the second generation, because they still carry with them the spiritual formation they received in Africa. For example, a young lady who had completed secondary school felt the pressure of academic life—from both her peers and her parents—and wanted to take a year off from study. She just wanted to refresh her mind and avoid burnout, but her parents concluded that the devil was interfering with her. How can such parents interpret psychological phenomena in ways that are beneficial to their children? This is a struggle. I hope we can come up with solutions.

Can you summarize how Christians should be thinking about the role of migrants in the church’s mission?

For a long time, migrant Christian communities have been described through the lens of others—of indigenous local communities that still hold cultural dominance. But we ourselves are active mission agents, helping to shape the trajectory of mission in a secularized culture. I appreciate that ETF is invested in new approaches to mission.

When I started studying theology in 1993, the relationship between migration and mission was not on the agenda. As a result, I was not well prepared when I had to migrate. We should be preparing people so that wherever the Lord takes them, for whatever reason, they can consider their migration as God allowing them to spread the gospel to places and among people who have left the faith or are not Christians.

Since you work to bring together Christians of multiple cultures, what would you serve if I came to your home for dinner?

We’d begin with Belgian soup, then have a spiced African rice and cassava leaves dish, and finish with classic Belgian chocolate pudding, all served on a dinner table decorated with braided African tablecloth.

News
Wire Story

Survey: US Hispanic Churches Could Do More if They Had More

Their pastors are mostly evangelical, sometimes bivocational, and eager for additional workers and funding to better serve their communities.

Christianity Today March 20, 2024
SDI Productions / Getty Images

Pastors of Hispanic Protestant churches in the United States maintain immense gratitude for their role, but many face financial struggles. Their congregations reflect diverse worship styles, but they have a unified desire to reach and serve their communities.

Lifeway Research partnered with numerous denominations and church networks to survey Hispanic Protestant pastors in the United States for a study sponsored by Lifeway Recursos, the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, and Samaritan’s Purse. This study follows a Lifeway Research study of US Hispanic Protestant pastors last year focused on the congregations and their evangelistic outreach.

“The response from pastors and leaders about the first study we did last year was overwhelming,” said Giancarlo Montemayor, director of global publishing for Lifeway Recursos.

“The goal with this second study is to dig deeper into some of the nuances of the Hispanic church in the US, such as worship and outreach. We also wanted to pay close attention to the particular needs of the pastors serving in these communities who often struggle with cultural and political issues that are not present in an English-speaking church.”

Pastoral perspectives

The average Hispanic Protestant pastor shares many similarities with other Protestant pastors while also having some unique characteristics. Participating pastors are overwhelmingly evangelical, with 82 percent identifying as such compared to 17 percent who say they are mainline Protestant.

Seven in 10 have some type of higher education, including 44 percent who have a graduate degree. In terms of their theological education, almost half have completed Bible institute training (47%) or seminary courses (46%).

More than a third have a master’s degree from a seminary (38%) or have taken courses from a Bible college (34%). A quarter (25%) have completed church-based school courses, while 12 percent have a seminary doctoral degree. Few (3%) say they have no formal theological education.

Half of US Hispanic Protestant pastors (51%) say they work full-time at their church. Three in 10 (30%) serve bivocationally, 13 percent volunteer, 6 percent are part-time and 1 percent are interim.

Of those who are bivocational, 88 percent work 20 or more hours at their outside job, including 51 percent who work at least 40 hours outside of the church. Those bivocational pastors say they do so primarily because it is a financial necessity for their families (79%). Half (48%) say they have a second job because it helps the church financially. Three in 10 (30%) work externally because their family needs the insurance benefits.

Less than a quarter say they do so to better identify with the population they want to reach (23%) or because they feel called to be bivocational (21%). Almost 1 in 5 (18%) say they have a job outside of their church because they enjoy working.

https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/SvE3k

Half (52%) of Hispanic Protestant pastors say their spouse also works to help the family financially, including 29 percent who say the extra income is essential and 23 percent who say it makes things easier financially for their family. Few (6%) say their spouse works but the income is not essential. Almost 2 in 5 (38%) say their spouse does not have a paid job that is needed to help sustain their family’s living expenses.

“The sources of training for pastors of Hispanic churches are more diverse than seminaries alone,” said Scott McConnell, executive director of Lifeway Research. “In the same way that some could not be full-time students to prepare for the pastorate, many must maintain employment in addition to their role as pastor to provide financially for their families.”

US Hispanic Protestant pastors were also asked questions similar to Lifeway Research’s recent Greatest Needs of Pastors study to determine their most pressing issues. However, these questions and options arose from interviewing Hispanic Protestant pastors specifically.

Pastors were asked about challenges in their family’s life, emotional and physical wellbeing, congregational dynamics and personal needs. A majority identified three specific issues they said needed attention—apathy or lack of commitment from people in their congregation (72%), balancing time between work and home (58%), consistently exercising (57%), and taking time to relax and have fun away from work (50%).

When dealing with issues, US Hispanic Protestant pastors are most likely to regularly turn to their spouse. Half (51%) say they openly share their struggles with their spouse at least once a month. More than a third (37%) turn to another pastor. Around a quarter talk with a close friend (26%) or a mentor (24%).

Fewer share monthly with another leader at church (13%), a counselor (7%), or a Bible study group in the church (6%). Almost 1 in 5 (18%) say they don’t openly share their struggles with any of these people in their life.

Regardless of any challenges, Hispanic Protestant pastors in the US believe leading a church has benefited them in several ways. More than 4 in 5 say they’ve been positively impacted as a pastor through seeing life transformation in others up close (85%), experiencing personal enjoyment using their gifts to serve others (84%), increasing their dependence on God (83%) and seeing personal spiritual growth (83%).

Slightly fewer said they’ve seen positive personal impact through helping families and marriages heal (79%), making meaningful connections with others (79%) and experiencing personal enjoyment or satisfaction doing ministry (78%). Less than 1 percent say they’ve had none of these, while 62 percent of pastors say they’ve experienced all seven.

“While many have come to realize the very real difficulties that pastors face in the US, pastors of Hispanic churches are quick to focus on the positives,” said McConnell. “Many of those in Hispanic churches work long hours and their pastors often do the same. Amidst these challenges, pastors have grown spiritually and enjoy serving others.”

Worship service

As to the types of worship services US Hispanic Protestant pastors lead, the potential variety stands out. They are most likely to say their style of service would be described as either blended traditional/contemporary (30%), Pentecostal (23%), contemporary (22%), or traditional (15%). Few see their worship services as liturgical (3%), post-modern/emerging (2%), or urban contemporary (2%).

During those services, attendees are most likely to hear praise songs heard on contemporary Christian radio (64%). Almost half of pastors say their church uses praises choruses (49%) or hymns (46%), while around a third feature songs written by Hispanic worship leaders (35%) or songs with a Latin rhythm (31%).

As part of the worship, churches are more likely to use words projected on the screen (90%) than hymnals (18%). Around half feature sermon notes on the screen (53%) or show a video (49%). The most popular instruments used are guitar (78%), piano or keyboard (77%) and drums (71%). Few use an organ (8%), while half say they use some other instrument (51%).

“Worship services in the Hispanic church within the US are considerably challenging because you deal with first, second, and third generations of immigrants who among themselves have specific needs,” said Montemayor.

“A first-generation immigrant believer will probably need a service completely in Spanish, whereas the second- and third-generation may have lost some of the cultural and linguistic characteristics of their parents, preferring a sermon in English but songs in Spanish.”

Services in US Hispanic Protestant churches feature many of the same elements as other Protestant churches and often repeat them each week. Almost every church has a sermon (99%), Scripture reading (96%), and congregational singing (95%) each week.

Around 9 in 10 say their weekly service includes pastoral prayer (93%), attendees greeting one another (91%), and intercessory prayer for the sick and needy (87%). Around 7 in 10 also feature each week an invitation to respond or altar call (72%), congregational reading (70%), and children’s stories (69%).

Other elements are more sporadic or dependent on the specific congregation. Almost 2 in 5 (38%) say the congregation recites a prayer each week, but 45 percent say that never happens in their church.

A time for testimonies occurs weekly in 38 percent of US Hispanic Protestant churches, monthly in 25%, quarterly in 13%, less than once a quarter in 16 percent and never in 9%. For a handful of congregations, reciting creeds happens weekly (15%), monthly (4%), quarterly (5%) or less frequently (10%), but 2 in 3 pastors (66%) say it never happens in their church.

Almost all Hispanic Protestant churches in the United States regularly include partaking in the Lord’s Supper (99%) and baptizing someone (97%), but their rhythms for doing so vary.

The most popular timing for the Lord’s supper is monthly (58%), followed by quarterly (22%), weekly (12%) and less than once a quarter (7%). Baptisms are less frequent, with almost half saying they happen at their church less than quarterly (47%) and slightly fewer saying the time frame is usually quarterly (39%). Fewer say they have baptisms monthly (7%) or weekly (4%).

Community service

US Hispanic Protestant churches aren’t only concerned with what happens inside their buildings. Serving their community is a priority. Almost every pastor (99%), including 88 percent who strongly agree, says it is important for their church to show the love of God to their community in ways that meet people’s tangible needs.

Pastors are split as to who they are most seeking to minister to with their service projects or ongoing service ministries: 46 percent say all people in their community, and 46 percent say all Hispanic people in their community. Few (6%) say they are specifically focusing on recent Hispanic immigrants.

“The Hispanic church in the US is characterized by meeting tangible needs of those in their community through service,” said McConnell. “Some Hispanic churches seek to meet needs of everyone around them, while others focus on serving Hispanic people because of language or affinity.”

https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/31EGF

When asked specifically how they served the community in the past year, 92 percent said they were doing something. Most said they provided marriage counseling (60%) and fed the hungry (53%). Many provided clothing for the poor (44%), gave back-to-school materials for children (43%), helped people find employment (39%), helped the elderly (31%) and helped people find housing (29%).

Fewer said their church supported local schools (21%), provided aid for mothers of newborns (17%), helped disaster victims (17%), met with people in prison (13%) or provided recovery or addiction ministries or groups (11%). Few churches sheltered the homeless (9%), tutored school kids (8%), offered after school programs (6%) or volunteered to provide foster care (3%).

In terms of ministering to immigrants, 89 percent of US Hispanic Protestant pastors said their church is equipped to serve new immigrants in their community.

In terms of specifics, 75 percent identified a way they served immigrants in the last year. More than half (54%) said they met information needs. Around 2 in 5 provided rides or transportation (41%) and supplied assistance with legal and immigration issues (37%). A quarter (24%) said they taught money management, while 18 percent offered English as a second language classes or mentors and 9 percent taught job skills.

While 70 percent of pastors agree they always have the resources they need to support the ministries they consider essential, they also indicate they could probably do more if they had more.

Most said significant challenges to serving their community include the need to train more people (56%), a lack of financial resources (52%) and not enough workers to go out and serve (51%). Slightly less than half point to the lack of resources to offer any immigration legal help (49%), not having the leaders to take responsibility (47%) and difficulty devoting the required time (44%).

Fewer say they do not have the facilities (31%), many people within the church are among those who need help (30%) and they lack knowledge of employment and housing opportunities (23%).

Nine in 10 US Hispanic Protestant pastors (86%) say their church’s teaching, evangelism and discipleship efforts have been impacted by their community service. Around 3 in 4 say their church has been able to show God’s love to their community (73%).

Most say their service has led to new families visiting their church (63%), new friendships built with people in the community (58%) and individuals accepting Christ as their Savior (56%). Many (44%) say the church’s service in the community has increased people’s openness to discuss and listen to what the church has to say.

Most pastors (53%) say their community work has given them opportunities to share the gospel message occasionally, while 38 percent say their service projects always included a presentation of the gospel.

“My prayer is that the global church could use this study to better inform their decisions on how to reach the Hispanic community and help churches already doing the heavy work,” said Montemayor.

Theology

Let’s Not Give Up Meetings on the Church Calendar

What if we ordered our habitual gatherings around Christ and the gospel story more than twice a year?

Christianity Today March 19, 2024
Illustration by Elizabeth Kaye / Source Images: Getty / Unsplash

This is the time of year when we pause our calendars to make space to celebrate Holy Week—rehearsing the gospel events leading up to the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

For centuries, Christians have followed a church calendar to mark seasons and special days honoring Jesus and the gospel: Advent, Christmas, Epiphany, Lent, Holy Week, Pentecost, and Ordinary Time (which marks the time periods in between Lent and Advent). And while most non-denominational churches are familiar with these in theory, they tend to only participate in one or two throughout the year.

We might hand out palm leaves on Palm Sunday or meet for evening worship on Good Friday—and we almost always celebrate Resurrection Sunday with far more pomp and circumstance than our usual services. Later, in December, we might do something special for each of the Sundays leading up to Christmas. But some of these other historic church events, like Ash Wednesday or Pentecost Sunday, for instance, are most often observed in more liturgical traditions and denominations.

Expecially for “low-church” Christians, the idea of following the church calendar generates mixed reactions. As inheritors of both the Protestant Reformation and evangelical revivalism, many non-denominational believers pride themselves on not adhering to tradition—which is sometimes viewed as manmade and unbiblical, meant only for Catholics, and even a stumbling block to authentic faith and worship. It’s not uncommon to hear, “It’s not a religion; it’s a relationship,” and for such events to be likened to the “religious festivals” seemingly downplayed in Col. 2:16.

And so, on the Monday after Easter weekend, most evangelical churches resume their regularly scheduled programming. Instead of continuing to order congregational gatherings, special events, and sermon series around the life and ministry of Jesus, we begin patterning them after other cultural events and holidays, like summer break, back-to-school, or even the Super Bowl. Our lives once again become centered around our work, school, extracurricular activities, hobbies, entertainment—and other priorities driven by our personal goals or professional aspirations.

But what if, this year, even the most liturgy-skeptical among us discovered how the church calendar can help us live out the truths we celebrate during Holy Week—long after it is over? As Mike Cosper explains, there’s a benefit in following the sacred traditions of the historic church:

To many Protestants, the church calendar may seem like an arbitrary regulation, a testimony to authority and micromanagement from Rome, but for its authors, it was designed pastorally. The church calendar was designed to walk believers through the story of the gospel every year, from the incarnation to the ascension. If we allow historic prejudice to color our perspective too heavily, we lose sight of the brilliant, pastoral creativity that shaped some of the church’s inventions.

In the words of pastor Andrew Wilson, “Calendars are not neutral; they narrate a particular vision of the world.” The calendars we live by tell a story about what we value and how we view our identity and purpose. The way we plan our years, months, and days cultivates certain rhythms, habits, and fruit in our lives. And if we examine the spiritual fruit we are (or aren’t) producing, we might realize how our schedule impacts our ability to become more like Christ.

Spiritual formation is also not neutral—which means if our habits are not discipling us in the way of Jesus, they are, by default, shaping us into the ways of the world. And research shows that the world is shaping believers in many, often negative, ways.

Barna released a recent study finding that many believers today are becoming busier and more distracted than ever. Nearly 50 percent of Christians struggle to find time for community with fellow believers because they say they are too busy. This dynamic is present at a time when 30 percent of US adults report feeling lonely daily and 20 percent of Christians say the same.

According to Lifeway, even if a person spends an hour every day in Bible reading and prayer, they are likely spending more than twice that amount of time on social media. Some say our increased habits of overconsumption are causing a growing mental illness epidemic among teenage girls—not to mention increasing polarization and political and racial division. The past few years alone have shown us that our social media usage is impacting us, and not for good.

Rather than equipping us to embody the gospel story daily, the way we order our lives can lead us to forget it altogether.

Gospel forgetfulness is not a new problem. Whether it was the nation of Israel during the time of the judges or Galatian believers in the days of Paul, God’s people have always struggled to remember their embeddedness in God’s world. Which is why, as we see in the Old Testament, God orders Israel’s life around specific festivals and feasts. This is also why, in the New Testament, Jesus commands his followers to observe sacraments like Communion and baptism.

Such spiritual habits are meant to remind us of our covenant relationship with God and our responsibility to each other as the body of Christ. And the church calendar—which orders our year around the Bible—is an important way Christians can practice these spiritual habits and resist the formational current of our culture.

Sadly, the story told by the calendars of many Christians today align far more with the world than with the gospel. The story of the world is centered around radical individualism and self-redemption. As the main characters of this story, we are on a journey to find freedom, authenticity, and happiness. This pursuit of flourishing is often materialized through the desire to find and maximize our true selves, which leads us to prioritize selfishness and self-sovereignty. This narrative, in turn, can ultimately lead us to embrace our sin and reject God.

The story of the gospel is drastically different. God is the main character, not us—and on our journey, we realize that as his creation, our desire for flourishing can only be met through our relationship with him. But this relationship requires we surrender our desires, submitting the entirety of our lives to his authority. Ultimately, this act of faith connects us with our true selves as divine image-bearers, and our story ends in receiving abundant and eternal life with God.

Each year, as we recount the details of Jesus’ life on earth, this remembrance is not merely intellectual but a fully embodied exercise that changes the way we live. Through Christ, we are God’s covenant people, and this reality shapes our perspective of the past, present, and future.

While there is a diversity of views about the church calendar, I have found Robert Webber’s framework helpful, as he separates the Christian year into two main sections: what he calls “the cycle of light” and “the cycle of life.”

The cycle of light highlights the incarnation of Jesus and encompasses the experiences of Advent, Christmas, and Epiphany, while the cycle of life is commemorated through the seasons of Lent, Holy Week, Easter, and Pentecost. The first cycle celebrates the coming of Jesus and the second speaks to the purpose for which he came—his self-giving sacrifice to free the world from Satan, sin, and death, and to secure forgiveness, healing, and life for all its peoples.

To quote Webber, the use of this cycle framework helps illustrate how “the church is called to proclaim continually and act out this central mystery of God’s reconciling work in Jesus Christ as it journeys through time from year to year, month to month, day to day, and hour to hour.” By remembering the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus year-round, we in turn are led to respond by living in light of our own baptism in Christ.

Rather than revolving our lives around entertainment, personal aspirations, or our children’s school activities, we can stay in sync with the rhythms of dying to sin and being raised to new life in Christ. Whether this reflection happens daily or weekly on Sunday, it will confront us with the eternal and overflowing love and grace of God and simultaneously force us to wrestle with the ways in which we have become too comfortable with the sin Christ died to save us from.

Moreover, regularly rehearsing the biblical story of redemption and restoration shines a light on how we use our resources and care for our neighbors. This light leaves no shadowy corners for complacency or passivity in how we use our time and money or respond to the mistreatment of other image-bearers. Instead, it produces a flourishing spirituality that’s rooted in God.

This cyclical rehearsal of the gospel message also provides a counternarrative to the story of the world. Far too often, we Christians are drawn in by its allure and tempted to live by our own power, seeing the end goal of our faith as our personal happiness. But celebrating holy days in our church can equip us to resist the tempting pull of our culture.

For instance, Pentecost Sunday—which will be celebrated soon in May—reminds us how it is only through the gift of the Holy Spirit that we have been empowered to live in God’s world and experience the abundant life Christ came to give us. This power is made manifest through his work of sanctification and through the spiritual gifts he gives. So rather than seeking human omnipotence, we are led to embrace a weakness that highlights the power of God.

This special day also refocuses us on the corporate nature of our faith. We have not only been saved into an individual relationship with God but also into a global church community that includes the entire body of Christ from ages past. God established the church as an essential and non-negotiable part of his plan for redemption. Pentecost helps us reaffirm our commitment to it and realign our life goals to the proclamation of the gospel and the restoration of the world—all to the glory of God.

This year, on the Monday after Easter, I encourage you to continue integrating the ancient Christian calendar into your personal life and the life of your church. Find tangible ways to keep aligning yourselves to the life of Jesus—whether that be through prayers, songs, or Bible readings.

Even though certain aspects of tradition can hinder our relationship with God, the church calendar is a long-standing Christian tradition that’s worth embracing all year round.

Elizabeth Woodson is a writer, Bible teacher, host of the Starting Place podcast, and founder of The Woodson Institute. She is the author of Embrace Your Life and From Beginning to Forever: A Study of the Grand Narrative of Scripture.

As Freedoms Shrink in Hong Kong, One Christian Media Editor Explains Why He Stays

Christian journalism has become even more important after the government passed a tough new national security law.

Newspapers printed by the Christian Times.

Newspapers printed by the Christian Times.

Christianity Today March 19, 2024
Illustration by Christianity Today / Source Images: Unsplash / Newspaper Courtesy of Lo Man Wai

Editor’s Note: Hong Kong officials unanimously passed its own version of a national security law Tuesday that could put people found guilty of political crimes, such as treason or external interference, in prison for life.

Article 23 of the Basic Law, Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, mandates the enactment of a national security law, which locals have protested in the past over fears that it could curtail freedoms. Now with a pro-Beijing parliament, the bill was passed at record speed.

John Lee, the city’s top leader, said the new law was needed to close gaps in the existing national security law that Beijing imposed on Hong Kong in 2020. He hailed its passage as “a historic moment Hong Kong people have been waiting for over 26 years.”

A coalition of 77 international parliamentarians and public figures, including Hong Kong’s last British Gov. Chris Patten and US Sen. Marco Rubio, have issued a statement condemning the Article 23 legislation, calling it a “flagrant breach” of the Basic Law, the Sino-British Joint Declaration, and international human rights law.

While many Hong Kongers have left the city, others, like Lo Man Wai, editor in chief of the Christian Times newspaper, have decided to stay. He writes here about his work in Hong Kong as the city undergoes unprecedented changes.

In the past four years since the implementation of the first national security law, Hong Kong has experienced a seismic shift. Many citizens who have been devoted to this city for decades, including prominent pro-democracy activists, journalists, opinion leaders, social workers, and politicians, have disappeared from the public sphere. Some have been detained; others are in exile. Still others remain in Hong Kong but are forbidden to speak publicly.

Once known for its freedoms, Hong Kong has sunk to the bottom of the Reporters Without Borders’ press freedom ranking. A sense of fear permeating civil society causes citizens to self-censor. Pro-democracy newspapers and websites have shut down as journalists have started their own news channels on social media. The city is currently experiencing a severe brain drain, although the government will not admit it.

So what am I doing still running a Christian news platform in Hong Kong?

The Chinese-language Christian Times started in 1987 as a small weekly newspaper. Through news stories, features, opinions, and devotions, we reflect on social issues from a Christian perspective and convey discussions among Christians of different denominations and theological backgrounds. What differentiates Christian Times from other Christian publications in Hong Kong is its focus on journalism.

Today we see our mission as even more necessary because an authoritarian government can easily overlook the weak and the vulnerable, and because Christians need access to the truth about what is happening around them.

As the atmosphere tightens in Hong Kong, we feel it as well. More and more writers and sources prefer to remain anonymous. It is difficult to find Christians willing to share their heartfelt opinions with our readers because of the need to self-censor.

The church is also facing unique challenges. Many churches in Hong Kong have historical, denominational, and social ties with churches in mainland China. The stories of Christian persecution in the mainland—from the arrests and violence of the Cultural Revolution in the 1960s to the cross removals in 2014—inform the churches in Hong Kong of what the future of religious freedom could look like.

Local churches are experiencing their own brain drain as congregants and pastoral staff leave Hong Kong for the United Kingdom as well as other countries. Churches increasingly face financial shortfalls as their congregations shrink and Hong Kong’s post-COVID economy struggles. These are important trends and stories that Christian Times continues to cover.

While our readers continue to support us through subscriptions and donations, our advertising revenue has fluctuated. Christian organizations, churches, and members of the local Christian community are our main advertisers. For a few years after the political changes, the number of job recruitment ads skyrocketed as many churches and organizations needed to fill the vacancies left by those who migrated overseas. In the latter half of 2023, a total of 222 churches posted openings on our site and on denominational sites.

But in recent months, the number of recruitment ads has been dropping. We are not exactly sure why, even though the city is currently facing an economic decline as stock prices, housing prices, and exports drop.

Recruiting staff to run our media site is also becoming more difficult. When we post job listings, only a few people apply. In the past, many were willing to work for us as interns, volunteer reporters, or photojournalists. While Christian Times hasn’t seen a mass exodus like some local churches, where up to half of the congregation has left, it is still difficult to find employees able to take on the heavy workload we currently experience.

I don’t blame those who are leaving Hong Kong, especially now as our freedoms crumble. Leaving is a rational decision. Yet while people can go, the church cannot. There are still people here in Hong Kong who need to hear the gospel and how it fulfills their spiritual, emotional, and material needs. The Christian community in Hong Kong still needs information to understand the current reality and make wise judgments. Certainly, Christian media has work to do here.

In a society that is becoming more and more authoritarian, the voices of the weak and the powerless are increasingly overlooked, neglected, or silenced. An independent media source like ours can give these voices a platform, even if we take on risks ourselves. To continue publishing, we need to make sure that we don’t touch the government’s “red line,” as the results would be catastrophic. Yet the government doesn’t state clearly where that red line is. Even for simple editorial decisions, we need to seriously calculate whether it is a risk worth taking. Then we act in faith.

For instance, in 2021, just a year after the implementation of the previous national security law, the Hong Kong government planned to require all citizens to install a COVID-19 contact tracing app on their phones, which they would have to show every time they entered a public premise. But for the poor or homeless who could not afford a smartphone, such a measure could bar them from essential public facilities such as bathrooms, hospitals, and markets.

Organizations working with that population were concerned about the consequences, yet they worried that under the new law, they could be punished for discussing public affairs. Would publicly criticizing a government measure touch the red line? Still, one Christian nonprofit decided to interview some people who would be impacted by the measure and uploaded the recordings to social media.

Christian Times and several other local media outlets decided to cover the story despite the risks. Soon afterward, the government amended the measure. People without smartphones could ask social workers for letters that would permit them to register their information at the entrance to public premises by hand. The Hong Kong government did not mention whether they made the change due to public objections, so we can’t say for sure if our reporting was effective. But we know it was the right thing to do.

Our editorial desk has faced many such deliberations in the past few years. Sometimes we decided the risk was not worth taking. When we did take the risk, sometimes we saw change because of our coverage, but frequently we did not.

As Christian journalists in Hong Kong, we need wisdom from God for discernment in our daily lives. We want more people to care about the poor, the weak, the sick, the homeless, and those in prison, just as Jesus told us to do in Matthew 25:31–46. We know that we can’t do it all, but we hope the Lord will use our small works in this city for his purpose.

The situation in Hong Kong continues to tighten. The government has just passed legislation against treason, sedition, insurrection, espionage, and collaboration with external forces, which will go into effect on March 23. Yet a similar proposal in 2003 ignited a peaceful demonstration by half a million people, bringing the legislative process to a halt.

This time, there are no protests due to the heavy punishment against protesting since the implementation of the national security law four years ago. The government now claims that 99 percent of the people who submitted their opinions on the new law agreed with it.

A recent survey found that Hong Kongers believe that there is above-average freedom of religion in Hong Kong. Meanwhile, freedom of speech, press, and association are a bit below average. (Freedom of demonstration was rated the lowest.) However, religious freedom is not independent of other freedoms. We are not sure what will happen after the proposed legislation is in effect. Will religious freedom remain the same? Will local churches still be able to fellowship with churches overseas? Will there be space for news media to uphold journalistic values? Where will the red line be?

Please pray for Hong Kong. We also need your prayers for Christian Times so that we can continue to serve the Christian community faithfully here, providing them with truth and keeping a written history of what is happening in our beloved city.

Books
Review

Honey, We Shrunk the Family

Timothy P. Carney’s Family Unfriendly explores plunging American fertility and how to get out of the baby bust.

Christianity Today March 19, 2024
Illustration by Elizabeth Kaye / Source Images: Getty / Pexels

In 204 B.C., the Romans imported a new foreign cult. When the barge bringing the cult statue to Rome got stuck in the shallow waters of the Tiber, an aristocratic young woman, Claudia Quinta, miraculously pulled the rope to draw it in single-handedly. As her name tells us, she was the fifth daughter in her family.

Family Unfriendly: A Critical Examination of Overparenting and Its Consequences

The reason this story first stood out to me years ago is the same reason it came to mind while reading journalist Timothy P. Carney’s new book, Family Unfriendly: How Our Culture Made Raising Kids Much Harder Than It Needs to Be: Fifth kids are rare. Not coincidentally, they’re hard. “Comedian Jim Gaffigan has offered a vivid description of having a fifth child,” Carney writes. “Imagine you’re drowning. And someone hands you a baby.”

Fifth daughters were rare in ancient Rome for a different reason than they are in modern America, where we no longer have to provide good dowries to contract marriages for each girl (though college tuition might be a comparable expense). Rather, the contemporary US has joined the rest of the West—and a rising share of the Global South—in an unprecedented, apparently unrelenting baby bust. Not only are fifth kids uncommon these days, even second kids are increasingly rare, and the number of childless singles and couples is at a record high. Economics are just one factor here. We’re looking at a major cultural shift.

Just how bad are things? “The average thirty-five-year-old American woman in 2020 had just above 1.5 kids, which is the lowest number on record,” Carney notes. This is well below the replacement rate of 2.1 children, and it’s bad news for everyone—though many don’t realize it yet. A family-unfriendly society is a miserable society and, in the long run, an economically precarious one too. Just look at any country where retirees outnumber the working-age young.

What would a family-friendly society look like? Well, we could know it by its fruit and its fruitfulness: more marriages, more marital stability, and more children. Maybe not a lot of fifth babies, but certainly more second and third ones. But before we consider Carney’s recommendations for how to be more family friendly, let’s consider his explanation for how America became such an unfriendly place for parents and kids.

In a move that signals the target audience of the book, Carney opens with a polemic against travel sports. For many middle-class families, having children now comes with unrealistic expectations of excellence. Sports and other extracurricular activities aren’t for fun anymore—children are expected to start thinking about the Olympics (or at least college scholarships) by the middle of kindergarten.

Does this sound extreme and more than a little ridiculous? Of course, but that’s the increasingly common mindset. It’s an arms race. Moms and dads alike spend more time with our kids than did our counterparts a generation or two ago, but it’s not quality time. It’s stressful time, time spent chauffeuring, supervising, and worrying about which college Junior will attend even before potty-training begins. For some, Carney argues, the overwhelming expectations around getting parenting right leads to a decision to have no children or just one, who will be given every opportunity, every resource, every parental attention.

And these expectations are only the tip of the iceberg, Carney says. He considers how modern neighborhoods are built for cars, not people. There are fewer sidewalks, reducing or eliminating walkability. Fewer public spaces where families can gather at leisure. Neighbors often don’t know each other; many kids don’t play on the block; and indeed, the mere idea of children playing unsupervised outside is deemed dangerous—in some states, enough to incur the scrutiny of the law.

Add to this the growing distance between middle-class professionals and their parents and extended family, and raising kids comes to feel lonely and exhausting, because it is. When parents are this tired, they end up having fewer children, often fewer children than they wish they could have.

Carney also highlights recent technological shifts, especially smartphones, for their role in warping kids’ brains, increasing isolation, and revolutionizing dating so that achieving marriage becomes more difficult. Meanwhile, the technology of the pill has allowed people to postpone childbearing, often in service to the religion of “workism.” The pill (and, as Leah Libresco Sargeant has argued, the pump) allows newer strains of secular feminism that encourage women to choose careers over children to promote this vision while denigrating stay-at-home mothers or even motherhood itself. The message appears to be sinking in.

It’s a compounding problem too: A society with fewer kids naturally becomes less kid-friendly over time—less willing to accommodate children and families in public spaces, less kind, less joyful, more selfish. And a culture hostile to kids is a culture of sterility, a culture increasingly hostile to people in general. Our view of children reflects our larger anthropology: People are bad—not in the hyper-Calvinist sense, which at least offers hope and salvation in Jesus, but in a humans are a plague on this planet kind of way, which is utterly hopeless. We are living, Carney concludes, in a profound “civilizational sadness.”

Carney’s analysis is the result of a decade’s worth of research and a lifetime’s worth of observations of his own family. I found it convincing. But there’s a component I suspect plays a larger role than Carney indicated—and I think he knows it, because he gives it more emphasis in his previous book, Alienated America: Why Some Places Thrive While Others Collapse. This component is the role of the church in creating a family-friendly culture and the corresponding role of dechurching in making a culture that doesn’t have kids.

In Alienated America, Carney argues that the decline of church attendance was a significant factor in the erosion of our social ties. This shift is upstream from how we build our neighborhoods and write our tax codes. Healthy theology, robust church life, and communal support for young families are upstream from good policies pertaining to children and fertility too. In one of Family Unfriendly’s most poignant theological statements, Carney notes:

Babies aren’t objects. Babies are subjects. Objects—electric cars, homes, coffeemakers—are contingent goods. They are good insofar as they improve the lives of humans. Babies are the opposite of consumer goods. They are that for the sake of which we build societies, and thus governments, and thus tax codes. A tax code should favor toddlers over terriers or Teslas, because man-made law should favor people over nonpeople. A government should be partial toward children, because a government should be partial toward humans. Ours is a government for the people, not for the puppies.

This is powerful, and so are the rest of the solutions for which Carney advocates for creating an America that is more family friendly: more parental leave, a pro-marriage and pro-child tax code, a built environment that allows kids to roam free, a culture that is more supportive of homemakers and resists workism, a society in which we put people first.

These are all good ideas, and I would love to see them materialize. And yet, I found myself thinking, a stronger culture of local church membership would organically resolve many of the problems Carney identifies.

Consider emergencies. Let’s say you’re in labor, to use a directly relevant example. What trustworthy friends can you call to come watch your kids—however many there are—at a moment’s notice? If you’re involved at church, you likely have many such people in your life, and you can be that person for others. If you’re irreligious or otherwise unchurched, you almost certainly have a far smaller group on whom you can call.

For the (very not fun) two weeks that I went over my due date with my third child, a friend from church went everywhere with a packed overnight bag in her car. If she needed to get to my house quickly, she could. When I finally called her around midnight, she came right away. She took care of my older two children that January night, allowing me and Dan to focus on welcoming our youngest.

No policy can make that kind of emergency support possible. In early parenting, maybe more than any other season of life, you need real people—flesh and blood, friends and family, people who come because they love you, not because someone is paying them—to be right there, eager to help. (I’ve semi-joked that I’d have another baby just to get another meal of the lasagna one elder’s wife at our previous church dutifully took to all new moms. It was that good.)

More than any possible government program, this kind of network will encourage people to have more babies. And Carney would most certainly agree—indeed, the introduction to his book involves just such an emergency for his own family. They came through it relatively smoothly because of the beautiful support of their relatives, colleagues, and, most of all, the church.

The bride of Christ is not flawless in the here and now. Yet it is churches that have the capacity to create, at least in microcosm, a culture that is family friendly in a world that is not.

Nadya Williams is the author of Cultural Christians in the Early Church (Zondervan Academic, 2023) and the forthcoming Mothers, Children, and the Body Politic: Ancient Christianity and the Recovery of Human Dignity (IVP Academic, 2024).

News

Who Restricts Religion More, Politicians or the People? Pew Crunched the Global Data.

Annual report grades 198 nations and territories, with 9 in 10 harassing believing communities. China and Nigeria score the worst.

Iraqi Christian youths enter a Sunday service

Iraqi Christian youths enter a Sunday service

Christianity Today March 18, 2024
Spencer Platt / Getty / Edits by CT

Government restrictions on religion are at a global high.

Social hostility toward religion, however, has ticked downward.

So concludes the Pew Research Center in its 14th annual analysis of the extent to which 198 nations and territories—and their citizens—impinge on religious belief and practice.

Some sort of harassment of religious groups was recorded in all but eight.

The 2024 report, released earlier this month, draws primarily from more than a dozen UN, US, European, and civil society sources, and reflects conditions from 2021, the latest year with fully available data.

The global median on Pew’s 10-point scale of government restrictions reached 3.0 for the first time ever, continuing a steady rise since the baseline score of 1.8 in 2007. Overall, 55 nations (28%) recorded levels marked “very high” or “high,” only two lower than last year’s total of 57.

Nicaragua was highlighted for harassment of Catholic clergy.

Regional differences are apparent: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) scored 5.9, up from its baseline score of 4.7. Asia-Pacific scored 4.2, up from 3.2. Europe scored 3.1, up from 1.7. Sub-Saharan Africa scored 2.6, up from 1.7. And the Americas scored 2.1, up from 1.0.

Pew’s 20 measures of government restrictions included efforts to “ban particular faiths, prohibit conversion, limit preaching, or give preferential treatment to one or more religious groups.”

Some pertained to COVID-19, such as Canada’s fines against open churches.

A further 13 measures for acts of religious hostility by individuals or groups included “religion-related armed conflict or terrorism, mob or sectarian violence, harassment over attire for religious reasons, and other forms of religion-related intimidation or abuse.”

Social hostilities toward religion continued to trend downward since a high of 2.0 in 2018, decreasing to 1.6, the lowest score since 1.2 in 2009. But 43 nations (22%) still recorded levels marked “very high” or “high,” though significantly fewer than the 65 offending nations in 2012.

Nigeria was cited for clashes between Muslim herders and Christian farmers.

The order of regional differences in social hostility matches that of government restrictions. MENA scored 3.6, returning to near its baseline score of 3.7 after peak years from 2012–2014. Asia-Pacific scored 1.9, up from 1.7. Europe scored 1.9, up from 1.2. Sub-Saharan Africa scored 1.3, up from 0.4. And the Americas scored 0.8, up from 0.3.

Only four nations recorded “very high” status in both categories: Afghanistan, Egypt, Pakistan, and Syria.

Joining them as repeat offenders for government restrictions were Algeria, Azerbaijan, China (highest with a score of 9.1), Indonesia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Maldives, Myanmar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Pakistan joined the list this year with Turkmenistan, while Brunei and Eritrea dropped out.

Fewer nations were designated “very high” on social hostilities, but repeat offenders also included India, Israel, and Nigeria—highest with a score of 8.9. No new nations joined the list this year, while Iraq, Libya, Mali, and Somalia dropped out.

Grading took place on a scale. The top 5 percent of nations in each index were categorized as “very high,” while the next 15 percent were “high.” The following 20 percent were categorized as “moderate,” while the remaining 60 percent were “low.” (Though Pew recognizes North Korea as a clear offending nation, it was not included in the report due to the inability of independent observers to have regular access.)

Most nations in both indexes showed little to no change in their rating. Only 16 recorded a moderate increase of 1.0–1.9 or higher in their combined score, while only nine nations experienced a similar decrease. And only one country, Sudan, witnessed a decline of 2.0 or more for government restrictions, as a new constitution, now in limbo amid civil war, decriminalized apostasy.

For social hostilities, only Turkey and Bolivia declined similarly, the latter due to no reports—as in previous years—of Protestant missionaries expelled from indigenous areas. Conversely, Uganda and Montenegro witnessed 2.0 increases in their scores, the latter due to vandalization of mosques and harassment of Christian proselytization.

Most common, according to Pew, is government harassment. More than 9 in 10 nations (183 total) tallied at least one incident. Social harassment occurred in more than 8 in 10 nations (160 total), and 157 nations experienced both.

Pew also tallied the type of force or violence inflicted around the world. Property damage was most common with 105 offending nations, with Europe registering the highest with 71 percent occurrence. The MENA region led percentage occurrence in all other types, with physical assaults recorded in a global total of 91 nations, detentions in 77, displacement in 38, and killings in 45.

Ethiopia was noted for the deaths of 78 priests during its civil war.

Christians and Muslims remain the religious groups receiving harassment most widely. The number of nations harassing Christians increased from 155 to 160, up from a baseline total of 107. Nations harassing Muslims decreased from 145 to 141, but still up from the baseline number of 96. Harassment of Jews also declined from 94 to 91, but was only recorded in 51 nations in 2007.

An “other” category of Baha'is, Sikhs, and Zoroastrians followed, harassed in 64 nations, followed by folk religions in 40. Violations against Buddhists (in 28 nations), Hindus (in 24), and an “unaffiliated” category of atheists, agnostics, and humanists (in 27) were less widespread.

A new feature in Pew’s report tracked nations that provided benefits to religious groups. With a total of 161 countries qualifying, 127 supported religious education, 107 offered funds to construct or maintain religious buildings, and 67 compensated clergy to some degree. Of the latter, more than half (36 nations) gave preferential treatment to certain religions. And of the total, 149 governments nonetheless harassed believers or interfered in their worship.

Saudi Arabia, Pew noted, gives stipends to imams yet restricts their sermons.

In addition to a tally of nations, Pew also organized data to measure the impact of restrictions and hostilities on a wide scope of humanity. Among the 25 largest nations—representing 5.8 billion of the 7.8 billion world population in 2021—Egypt, Pakistan, India, Indonesia, and Nigeria recorded the highest overall levels. Japan, the United States, South Africa, Italy, and Brazil ranked lowest.

Books
Review

Metaphors Have a Power That’s More Than Metaphorical

Joy Clarkson peels back the veil of overfamiliarity from commonplace expressions and images.

Christianity Today March 18, 2024
Illustration by Mallory Rentsch Tlapek / Source Images: Unsplash / Getty

I’m afraid these men would only slow me down,” says a cocksure Benedict Cumberbatch in the role of the godfather of computer science, Alan Turing. A 2014 biopic, The Imitation Game, portrays Turing as a lonely, world-changing genius who reluctantly takes on help from less intelligent colleagues who’d only threaten his efficiency and from whom he has to hide secrets that threaten his clearance, career, and life. As it turns out, he will need his friends’ help to keep his job, and together, they crack the Nazis’ Enigma code and create the prototypical model for a computer, the Turing machine (this is history, not a spoiler!).

You Are a Tree: And Other Metaphors to Nourish Life, Thought, and Prayer―A Contemplative Meditation on Language in Scripture and Poetry to Find Meaning and Understanding in Our Words

One of Turing’s many contributions to the development of computing intelligence was the Turing test—a method designed to probe a machine’s ability to display intelligent behavior a human observer might confuse for human behavior. Needless to say, we’ve come a long way in that department. In (successfully) designing computers to match and exceed many aspects of our own cognitive faculties, we find ourselves in a chaotic battlefield where grim doomsday jeremiads about AI and utopian techno-optimist manifestos vie for the soul of humankind.

Guiding these rapid-fire developments is a powerful metaphor: the human mind as computer. And the more we use this metaphor, the more readily we come to believe it. And yet, as this mindset has infused itself into our collective unconscious, it’s been met with more and more resistance.

Consider philosopher and cognitive scientist Tim van Gelder, author of the 1995 essay “What Might Cognition Be, If Not Computation?” In it, he suggests that the Turing machine (a computational model) is less helpful for modeling human cognition than what he calls a “dynamical system.” Such a system is constantly adapting to an always changing environment, responding and adjusting in an automatic give-and-take relationship, whereas a Turing machine is geared only at solving a specific equation.

In other words, our brains are always growing and adapting to our world; they’re not machines programmed with a set algorithm for a specific outcome.

Giving shape to the intangible

In her newest book, You Are a Tree: And Other Metaphors to Nourish Life, Thought, and Prayer, writer Joy Marie Clarkson explores the metaphors we inhabit in our everyday lives. In our rush to adopt and live into powerful metaphors, we can easily forget that metaphors are, by definition, incomplete approximations. As Clarkson explains in her introduction, “This is why French philosopher Paul Ricoeur proposes what might be described as a tension theory of metaphor … between a literal and metaphorical interpretation. In noticing where the metaphor stops, we are forced to pay closer attention to why the thing isn’t actually what we describe it to be.”

Clarkson exemplifies a new generation of Substack writers and thinkers who’ve gained an audience by sharing thoughts as they go, blending diary-esque observations with erudite notes related to research and writing projects. Reading her book feels more like catching up with an old friend over coffee than sitting at the feet of a remote, inaccessible sage.

While van Gelder and Clarkson find common ground in their resistance to the “human as computer” metaphor, the similarities stop there. Van Gelder writes in a dense, mathematical style (more power to you if that’s your thing), and still employs a machine-based metaphor to describe human thought. Clarkson, on the other hand, is a theology and literature scholar at King’s College London, and her words flow from a passion for poetry, literature, story, and the Bible, revealing a whimsically fun wit and an openness to everyday wonder. She sticks to more agricultural and naturalistic metaphors, arguing that computers, “as a systematic metaphor for human flourishing,” are “incomplete and unforgiving.”

As her book title suggests, Clarkson believes you are less like a computer (designed to work with perfect efficiency) and more like a tree in a forest. Trees, not unlike Turing with his peers, need the sustaining roots of surrounding trees to help them flourish amid seasons of poverty and plenty alike.

You Are a Tree begins with a compelling reintroduction to the concept of metaphors, unpacking just how subtly they can shape us. Metaphors are more than just another poetic tool in one’s flowery-language kit—they can generate cathartic aha moments of self-understanding by giving tangible form to intangible, inexpressible feelings or ideas.

Clarkson shares how, for most of her life, she has been compelled to move from place to place, leaving her to feel like a potted plant whose roots can only go so deep. As she recalls, landing on that potted-plant metaphor “pained but also satisfied me.” A good metaphor is freeing, because it allows us “to speak about our experiences” and to “give these things shape so that we can look at them, talk about them, show them to other people so they can be witnessed, maybe even understood.” Through metaphors, we can know and be known.

Poor metaphors, however, can be dangerous. Unhelpful comparisons are more than just conceptually unclear—they can tempt us into ascribing misleading and even dehumanizing traits to ourselves and others. Clarkson points out how the humans-as-computers metaphor places the highest value on productivity, which can imply that less productive people are broken or expired, and therefore more disposable. This metaphor says, If you can’t function as well, you are less valuable.

Metaphors are not neutral, then. Whether we choose them consciously or absorb them unconsciously, they have a subtle but powerful influence on our lives, and wrestling with them can play a vital role in our individual journeys of spiritual formation.

After establishing the flawed nature of mechanistic metaphors for humanity, Clarkson reserves most of her chapters for unpacking a set of better, richer metaphors (not to mention metaphors within metaphors). In a patient and pleasantly meandering fashion, she traces their appearances in Scripture, literature, and everyday life. Clarkson further equips readers for reflection with examples and recommendations drawn from poems, paintings, films, songs, and even architecture.

The wisdom of clichés

You Are a Tree is an illuminating guide to the metaphors we use for God and our own lives, and it will show you how to meditate on a metaphor and let its deeper meanings speak. One testament to Clarkson’s depth and insight comes from the fact that many metaphors she covers—“wisdom is light,” for instance, or “life is a journey”—explore phrases you’ve probably heard countless times before, to the point of sounding clichéd. What more could one add? Yet Clarkson consistently breathes new life into language that can seem trite at first glance.

Because of the book’s meditative approach and sometimes winding path, some parts will likely prove more interesting than others, depending on how resonant particular metaphors are to particular readers. When specific sections aren’t resonating, the metaphors may start to feel a bit monotonous, and the chapters’ flowing structure might begin to feel unfocused. This is one reason I’d recommend reading the book in shorter increments (one to two sittings per chapter) rather than churning right through. For a relatively short book, You Are a Tree covers a lot of ground, almost like a survey course for college undergraduates. It is packed with insight, though, and if you pay attention (as she reminds us often), you should come away with a wealth of profound and potentially paradigm-shifting insight.

In the final chapter, Clarkson expounds on the “life is a journey” metaphor, admitting to the tricky balancing act she faces in even writing about such commonplace phrases. As she puts it, “I realize I am dangerously close to becoming a ridiculous inspirational plaque in a home-and-garden shop. Life is not about the destination, but the journey,” after which she half-jokingly philosophizes, “But what is life and what is a journey?” In actually diving into these questions, Clarkson tears back the overfamiliarity veil that so often cloaks the simplest but deepest truths.

In reflecting on why life really is a journey, Clarkson brings up Augustine’s sense of restless longing, or, in her words, “what the German existentialists might call Unheimlichkeit, a radical homelessness,” an idea she expands on with references to Camus, Heidegger, James K. A. Smith, and The Lord of the Rings , among others. As a third-culture kid myself—someone with a complicated relationship to the concepts of home and belonging—this resonated immensely. It’s something I will explore a lot more in my own writing. And I’m confident there’ll be at least one image or idea, and likely many more, that will similarly resonate with you.

Raed Gilliam is a writer and filmmaker, and an associate producer for CT Media.

News

Died: Michael Knott, Christian Alternative Musician Who Helped Launch Tooth & Nail

Knott wrote rock operas, sang with honesty and conviction, called out hypocrites, and bucked the norms of the Christian music industry.

Christianity Today March 18, 2024
Illustration by Christianity Today / Source Image: Spotify

Michael Knott, whose music and influence helped cultivate the Christian alternative music scene of the 1990s and 2000s, died Tuesday at the age of 61. He is survived by his daughter, Stormie Fraser.

Knott was the founder of the label Blonde Vinyl and later collaborated with Brandon Ebel to launch the highly influential Tooth & Nail Records, known for bands like Underoath and MxPx.

His raw, innovative, and controversial music pushed against the norms of the industry and laid the groundwork for contemporary communities around Christian alt music.

“Knott helped prove that Christian music could be something legitimate, rather than running two to three years behind mainstream trends,” said Matt Crosslin, who runs the site Knottheads and has become an unofficial archivist of Knott’s work.

Even with his reputation for bucking standards, Knott’s sense of mission was earnest and singular.

“He wanted people to come to Jesus and be saved,” said Nathan Myrick, assistant professor of church music at Mercer University. “He seemed to offer a way of holding faith and raw authenticity in tension.”

Knott was born in Aurora, Illinois, and grew up with six sisters in what he described as a modern “von Trapp family.” They were constantly singing and immersed in music through their father, a folk singer, and their mother, a church organist.

When Knott was in second grade, his family moved to Southern California, where he began to take piano and guitar lessons at the YMCA. He started writing songs in his preteen years and would bury them in a folder in his backyard, convinced that nothing would ever come of his private creative life.

Despite his early shyness about his songwriting, Knott began playing with bands in high school and performing at local clubs and bars. After coming to faith, he started to feel like the music he was performing didn’t offer anything meaningful. Through contacts at Calvary Church in Costa Mesa, California, Knott connected with the Christian punk band the Lifesavors and joined. (They later rebranded the group as Lifesavers, then Lifesavers Underground or L.S. Underground)

Throughout his career, Knott performed with a number of bands and released music as a solo artist; his discography is sprawling and varied. He was heavily influenced by fellow California rock bands the Red Hot Chili Peppers and Jane’s Addiction but dedicated himself to driving the scene forward rather than creating copycat music for the Christian market.

Despite remaining a fixture and catalyst in the Christian alternative scene in the ’80s and ’90s, Knott struggled to make his way in the music industry and to sustain an upward trajectory. He launched the groundbreaking indie label Blonde Vinyl in 1990, but when its distributor went bankrupt in 1993, the label folded.

Knott’s band, Aunt Bettys, signed to Elektra Records (a label owned by Warner Music Group) in the mid-’90s, joining the ranks of Metallica, Tracy Chapman, and The Cure. After a short run with the label, Knott went his own way. There was speculation that Knott’s theatricality and eccentricities were worrisome for label executives.

In a 2003 article, HM Magazine described the many personas of Mike Knott: “a non-Christian,” “a liberal,” “a zealot like Peter,” “a Proverbial fool who speaks too often and too soon with too little thought first.”

For a time, he performed with his face painted white; in his early years with the Lifesavors he was kicked out of Calvary Church for dancing too wildly on stage (and reportedly for encouraging the audience to dance too). He also had a drinking problem, which he spoke and wrote honestly about.

Knott had a reputation for being uncompromising and persistent. Artists like Keith Green and Larry Norman developed similar reputations in the industry for bucking corporate norms and ignoring business advice.

Knott’s convictions about unfettered musical creativity and blunt truth-telling made him an industry black sheep; he was self-aware about the fact that his candidness sometimes chafed those around him. He joked that his nickname in the 1980s was “Captain Rebuko”: “If someone did anything wrong, I would rebuke ’em,” he told HM.

But Knott wasn’t interested in rebuking people for their struggles with worldly vices like drugs or promiscuity; he was concerned about hypocrisy, deception, and spiritual manipulation.

His conviction and condemnation were on full, unapologetic display in the L.S. Underground album The Grape Prophet. The album, which Knott described as a rock opera, tells the semi-autobiographical story of a faith community’s encounter with Bob Jones, Mike Bickle, and their group of Kansas City–based prophets that traveled the US during the ’80s and early ’90s.

Jones (the “Grape Prophet”) is depicted prophesying in songs like “The Grape Prophet Speaks.” According to Crosslin of the Knottheads site, the song “The English Interpreter of English” depicts Mike Bickle, the founder of IHOP, who has recently been accused of sexual abuse and other misconduct.

“Knott was calling out Mike Bickle in the early ’90s,” said Crosslin. “His music said, It’s okay to call this stuff out.”

Knott’s strident, painfully honest songwriting and musical experimentation was magnetic, even for Christian fans who sometimes wondered if they should be listening at all.

Writer Chad Thomas Johnston grew up listening to mainstream Christian pop and rock like Carman and Petra. The son of a Baptist minister in Missouri, he encountered Knott’s music through the Wheaton, Illinois–based Christian magazine True Tunes News.

“I was scared of his music when I first encountered it,” Johnston said in an interview with CT. “It was unflinchingly dark.”

Knott’s music addressed divorce, alcoholism, and drug use. He used profanity. “At the time, I couldn’t wrap my head around it. Christian artists were supposed to be singing Christian songs,” said Johnston.

When Knott helped found Tooth & Nail records in 1993, he attracted up-and-coming artists who were eager to join a label helmed by someone with a strong creative vision. In lending his credibility to Tooth & Nail, Knott laid the groundwork for the burgeoning Christian alternative scene of the 2000s, which saw Christian bands pull ahead and become the industry standard-bearers in metal and indie rock.

Those who have followed Knott’s work see a clear lineage from Knott to the spiritual and musical communities that formed around Christian alternative music through festivals like Cornerstone, and now Audiofeed and Furnace Fest.

“For many, the Christian alternative space is an extension of their church,” said Myrick, who is currently conducting ethnographic research on the Christian alternative music community. “People feel accepted, down to the core parts of who they are.”

Knott wasn’t only committed to the health of the alternative music scene—he was committed to the health of the singing church. He worried that the worship of the church didn’t reflect deep, complicated faith.

His 1994 album Alternative Worship: Prayers, Petitions and Praise aimed to offer something needed and unusual. The song “Never Forsaken” is a simple meditation on the Christian life that repeats the reassurance, Never left alone, never left alone.

“If you write a praise song and you’re honest, that will last,” Knott told Christian Music Magazine in 2001. “If you write a praise song just to write a praise song, it’s not going to work. If you write a song about a tree, and you’re honest, it’s going to work.”

Books
Excerpt

O Ye of Overconfident Faith

Like the disciples, we need to learn the difference between trust in Jesus and spiritual cockiness.

Illustration by Elizabeth Kaye / Source Images: Wikimedia Commons / Unsplash

One day, the disciples were stumped by a demon. They tried to cast it out of a little boy, but it refused to budge. In desperation, the boy’s father went to Jesus and begged for help (Matt. 17:14–20).

Defiant Joy: Find the Hope to Light Your Way, Even in the Darkness

Defiant Joy: Find the Hope to Light Your Way, Even in the Darkness

Multnomah

224 pages

$17.00

Jesus was exasperated. “You unbelieving and perverse generation,” he exclaimed. “How long shall I stay with you? How long shall I put up with you?” Then Jesus rebuked the demon, and immediately it departed.

The disciples asked Jesus, “Why couldn’t we drive it out?” He replied, “Because you have so little faith. Truly I tell you, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.”

Note that Jesus didn’t say that the disciples had no faith. He said they had “little faith.” If this was true of Peter and the disciples, then you and I have micro faith. Are you brave enough to look a demon in the eye and tell it to take a hike?

In the past, I’ve trusted God to help me give birth, find a job, get to church on time, hold my marriage together, and raise my kids. But telling off demons? For the disciples to even attempt this was remarkable.

Surely, they believed they could cast out the demon or they’d never have tried, least of all in front of all those people. So, why did Jesus become exasperated? Because he’d expected a few fishermen to give the devil his walking papers?

I think Jesus was exasperated because his disciples got cocky. They mistook courage for faith. The more they relied upon their own bravery, the less they relied on Jesus. Instead of asking Jesus why he didn’t drive the demon out, they asked why they couldn’t drive it out. They had forgotten that they’re but little children.

A few years ago, I walked into the kitchen to see my spindly little daughter preparing to lift an angry, bubbling casserole out of the hot oven. I didn’t decry an “unbelieving and perverse generation.” But I certainly yelled, “Whoa! Stop!”

You see, the disciples had no business evicting powerful demons all by themselves any more than my eight-year-old had any business extracting molten dinner from the oven. It was way out of their league. Working up the courage was all fine and dandy, but it wasn’t enough.

Faith isn’t fearlessness, and it isn’t courage. It’s a work of the Holy Spirit in our hearts. It’s his faithful endeavor to soften our hearts, fix our eyes on Jesus, and keep our hope alive, no matter what this life throws at us.

Excerpted from Defiant Joy Copyright © 2024 by Jennifer Michelle Greenberg. Published by Multnomah, an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC, on February 27, 2024.

Books
Review

Confronting the 21st-Century Church with the First-Century Church

Nijay Gupta helps us rediscover the compelling strangeness of the earliest Christians.

Illustration by Elizabeth Kaye / Source Images: Getty / Wikimedia Commons

If Christians are called to live differently, love generously, and speak boldly, should they ever get comfortable with their surrounding culture? Nijay K. Gupta opens his new book Strange Religion: How the First Christians Were Weird, Dangerous, and Compelling by asking this kind of question.

Strange Religion: How the First Christians Were Weird, Dangerous, and Compelling

Gupta, a New Testament scholar and popular author, bemoans how “pop Christianity in the Western world often reflects a ‘chemically altered’ version of the Jesus movement that has been manufactured for cheap refreshment.” In response, his book turns to the earliest Christian believers to ask how they lived out a more radical faith and how their example might speak today.

Strange Religion is split into four parts. Part One takes up the theme “Becoming Christian,” exploring the dynamics of conversion and cultural participation for Christians in the ancient world. Gupta’s first chapter captures the all-encompassing religious landscape that prevailed during this era. As he ably demonstrates, “time and place were not divided into secular and sacred.” Pagan gods permeated every area of ancient life, from the household to the battlefield.

In this world of sacrifices, idols, and religious festivals, Christians stuck out with their commitment to a God who superseded the pantheon of Greco-Roman gods. As Gupta explains, “Christians were going against the grain of the common religious thought, practices and dynamics of the time.” In a culture full of religious activity, they were out of place from the start.

Parts Two and Three tackle the beliefs and worship activities of these first Christians. Again, the main theme is distinctiveness. Gupta highlights, for example, just how peculiar it was to worship Jesus as sovereign. Ancient gods were seen as stronger and more powerful than humanity but not as holding ultimate power over all things. Jupiter (Zeus to the Greeks) was the boss, but only because of his victory in a kind of cosmic survival of the fittest.

Because of their distinct beliefs, Christians stood out in rejecting sacrifices to idols or cult statues. At a time when temples and townscapes were littered with religious images, the first Christians taught that God dwelt in humanity itself, not in statues. As Gupta explains in one chapter, they also redefined the nature of time, exchanging a pattern of festivals and cult celebrations for a weekly ritual day of rest and worship.

Part Three considers what early Christian communities looked like. Gupta draws nicely on ancient understandings of family and households to illuminate Paul’s language of the family of faith in his epistles, suggesting that this metaphor meant more to his first readers than we might assume.

This leads into Part Four, “How the First Christians Lived.” These closing chapters explore just how subversive Christian behavior was within the first-century Roman world. Even the simple act of treating others with kindness ran against the grain of Roman ethics, especially when it transgressed rigid boundaries between social classes. One highlight comes toward the end of chapter 11, as Gupta considers the case of Onesimus and Philemon against this historical background.

Even as he invites readers to emulate the first Christians, Gupta makes clear that they were far from perfect. Like believers of any age, they fought, argued, and wandered into error and distraction. The point of rediscovering their historical strangeness isn’t putting them on an exalted pedestal but rather esteeming them as brothers and sisters who have gone before us in the race.

Strange Religion provides a great survey of a complex historical world, but sometimes that complexity ends up tripping up the author. The relationship between first-century Jews and Christians presents perhaps the greatest confusion. On occasion, Gupta speaks of “Jews and Christians” as a unified whole, but elsewhere he speaks of them as wholly alien to one another.

The root of this muddled presentation is found in chapter 3, where Gupta, echoing New Testament scholar John Barclay, argues that “Roman writers did not link Jews and Christians together” in the late first and second centuries. “They were seen as separate cults and more or less separate groups.”

Despite this clear demarcation, Gupta time and again lumps the two faiths together. Throughout the book, “Jews and Christians” are contrasted with unbelieving Romans. The relationship between Jews and the first Christian communities is an enormous subject, and perhaps giving it too much attention would have obscured the book’s central argument. Nonetheless, Gupta leaves readers unclear about important historical distinctions.

More significantly, Gupta’s concluding chapter fails to drive home the central ideas of the book. He succeeds in showing how the first Christians were weird and dangerous in the Roman world of their time. And he demonstrates how compelling they were, winning converts as they pushed back against dynamics of power, cruelty, and pride that dominated ancient culture.

At times, however, Gupta’s conclusion reads more like a product of the “pop Christianity” he challenged in his introduction than a clear rebuttal. Early Christians, as he writes, were “a people obsessed by Jesus,” embracing “a religion of the heart” and “a God-with-us religion.” None of this is untrue, of course, but such language is already comfortably at home in the 21st-century church that Gupta seeks to confront with the first-century church.

The book holds the potential for a bolder challenge. Why do our churches so often elevate the interests of the culture above the interests of gospel-centered faithfulness? Why is our modern approach to time so often me-centered, rather than radically oriented around Christ? Why do our idols so often match those of our unbelieving neighbors, when we ourselves are living temples, dwelling places of the Spirit? Gupta could have gone further in asking where our own churches miss the mark in serving Christ today.

Even so, Strange Religion is a well-researched, entertaining journey into the world of the first Christians. Time and again, Gupta skillfully connects Scripture passages to the culture in which they were received and put into practice, shedding fresh light on their revolutionary impact. Clearly, we’re far from exhausting all we can learn from our earliest forerunners in the faith.

Ed Creedy is a PhD student in classics at King’s College London. He writes at The Early Church Blog.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube