Long, long ago in a Hollywood far, far away, Fanboys began a slow, strange trip into theaters. This love letter to Star Wars fandom was written in 1998 by a diehard Star Wars devotee as he awaited the release of the most anticipated film in movie history, Episode I: The Phantom Menace. Several years passed before the script was picked up, shot, and set for release. But that was back in the summer of 2007—just the beginning of a behind-the-scenes saga that's now legendary among film geeks and Star Wars fans.

Fanboys is about four Star Wars obsessed buddies road-tripping to California to steal a print of the Star Wars prequel so their dying friend, Linus, can see it before its release. He's only been given two to three months to live in his fight against cancer. The film's heart—friends bonding over a common love in the face of death—is strong with the force. And its many tips of the hat to Star Wars lore and fandom are a great deal of fun for the initiated. If you know what Ray Park looks like (or even who Ray Park is), recognize the name Harry Knowles, or have ever seen THX 1138, then you'll get a big kick out of the movie.

Kyle Newman as Fanboy Yoda, Dan Fogler as Hutch, Sam Huntington as Eric

Kyle Newman as Fanboy Yoda, Dan Fogler as Hutch, Sam Huntington as Eric

As a child of 1977 with more Star Wars toys in his office than I'd like to admit, I had a blast. Well, with the Star Wars stuff at least. Not all is well with this movie—even for a geek like me. And almost all of the negatives and flaws can be traced back to the battle that has stymied the release since 2007.

When Fanboys first screened for industry folk in 2007, it gained a lot of notice. George Lucas loved it (and even let the filmmakers use sound effects from his movies), Internet anticipation blew up like a thermal detonator, and director Kyle Newman was given extra money by The Weinstein Company to shoot more ambitious scenes. But that's when trouble seemed to creep in. Movie insiders reported that reshoots were shot by a different director and that Weinstein wanted the cancer plot removed in exchange for more typical road-trip movie humor (i.e., raunchy and vulgar sex jokes). Star Wars fans were angrier than a Tusken Raider and began an online protest. In the end, two versions of Fanboys were tested with audiences. The winner? The one with the cancer plotline. Director Newman and the original creative team were brought back in by Weinstein to restore the movie to the original vision—but were given only 36 hours to do it.

Kristen Bell as Zoe

Kristen Bell as Zoe

Thankfully, Fanboys has been released with the cancer plot intact (even though all the tinkering left the movie poorly edited and awkward). The plot about a dying guy's buddies trying to give him a "Death Star moment" is really the only thing that gives the movie heart, amps up the buddy-bonding stuff, and even lends the movie some poignancy.

Article continues below

Unfortunately, the movie's raunchy side also remains. In fact, Fanboys is really just a mash-up of Road Trip, any recent National Lampoon movie, and Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back from director Kevin Smith (who makes a cameo in Fanboys). In fact, most of the cruder stuff is directly lifted from other movies. Not only is this stuff recycled and not very funny, but it's obvious these scenes don't fit the original vision of the movie. How does a Star Wars send-up—let alone one about a dying young man—end up with crude hijinks involving gay bars, prostitutes, and pimps?

Hutch hangin' with some Storm Troopers

Hutch hangin' with some Storm Troopers

As I watched Fanboys, I lamented the Hollywood culture that insists that comedies for young men include endless penis, humping, and masturbation jokes, applaud the continued adolescence of manboys, and be aimed to the lowest common denominator. But when I realized that the Weinstein Company insisted on these things, I became both angry and sad that not only is this a cultural mainstay in Hollywood comedies, but also a business plan. (And one that apparently works, considering the success of the genre's current posterboy, Seth Rogen—who is in Fanboys).

Without the added sexual junk, the movie could have been an innocent and endearing tribute to Star Wars fandom and to male friendship. And it would have still been fun—in fact, the most rollicking and fun scenes in the movie are the ones all about Star Wars (including nerdy fights over Star Wars plot points and a killer climax involving the threatened destruction of memorabilia). And while the movie does feature guys who live in their parents' garages and refuse to grow up, the movie strikes a balance in the end by saying that this road trip was the capstone of their irresponsible years and that maturity doesn't have to mean putting away your favorite things. In fact, that's what Fanboys was probably supposed to be about: Remembering the joy we got from Star Wars, the dreams it gave us about another galaxy, and the friendships and connections we've built around those joys and dreams.

It's just too bad that it all went over to the darker side of comedy.

Talk About It

Discussion starters
  1. When does an interest become an obsession? When is loving something from pop culture a bad thing? To what degree is it a good thing?
Article continues below
  1. What characterizations in Fanboys are harmful stereotypes? What characterizations fit with the people you know who love Star Wars, Star Trek, etc.?
  2. How can Christians practically respond to Hollywood companies who seem to think comedies must include crude and sexual content?

The Family Corner

For parents to consider

Fanboys is rated PG-13 for pervasive crude and sexual material, language and drug content. The word pervasive is key when talking about the crude and sexual content. Lots of middle fingers fly, almost every word in the book is used, and the Lord's name is taken in vain over and over. References and jokes about masturbation, sex, homosexuality, pedophilia, menstruation, drug use, urinating on electric fences, testicles, etc. abound. A guy and a girl each press their bare butts against a window. While there is no other nudity, there are several few scenes of women in their underwear.

What other Christian critics are saying:
  1. Plugged In
  2. Crosswalk
  3. Catholic News Service
  4. Past the Popcorn

Fanboys
Our Rating
1½ Stars - Weak
Average Rating
 
(not rated yet)ADD YOURSHelp
Mpaa Rating
PG-13 (for pervasive crude and sexual material, language and drug content)
Genre
Directed By
Kyle Newman
Run Time
1 hour 30 minutes
Cast
Dan Fogler, Jay Baruchel, Kristen Bell
Theatre Release
February 13, 2009 by The Weinstein Company
Browse All Movie Reviews By:
Tags: