Related articles and links |  1 of 2

Last week in Sandy Cove, Maryland, at the headwaters of Chesapeake Bay, a group of evangelical leaders met to affirm our responsibility to care for God's creation. The gathering—sponsored by Christianity Today, the National Association of Evangelicals, and the Evangelical Environmental Network—included scholars, activists, denominational leaders, pastors, journalists, and representatives of relief organizations. Among the keynote speakers were Howard Snyder of Asbury Seminary, who called for a robust theology of creation; Sir John Houghton, one of world's foremost authorities on climate change, who gave a state-of-the-art report on global warming; and Larry Schweiger, president of the National Wildlife Federation, who told how his boyhood experience of both natural beauty and environmental destruction shaped his life's work.

What gives this meeting special significance is a largely unnoticed but profound shift in evangelical attitudes toward environmental concerns. For a long time, the rank and file of evangelicals perceived such concerns as part of a package deal—as if to acknowledge the reality of air pollution, say, committed you to embrace socialism, New Age pantheism, and Birkenstocks. The apocalyptic rhetoric of many environmentalists fueled this misperception.

But something has changed. Gradually, often reluctantly, many evangelicals have begun to recognize that there is a middle ground between laissez-faire capitalism and Earth First! At the same time, many environmentalists have begun to see the power of market-based incentives.

Not that such incentives offer a magic bullet. But they do point to a hopeful convergence, to the prospect for consensus on urgent matters even as disagreement persists on many points.

And yes, it's true, "environmentalist" is still a dirty word in many evangelical quarters—which is why the Sandy Cove gathering spoke of "creation care." But that term is not a euphemism or a bureaucratic evasion. Rather, as Snyder argued in his keynote address, it concisely expresses a fundamental biblical outlook that challenges evangelicals to take seriously their fidelity to Scripture.

The meeting last week concluded with a covenant among those present and an invitation to the evangelical community to engage the most pressing environmental questions. The prevailing spirit was neither Pollyanna-ish (the problems are daunting) nor despairing but rather hopeful.

Hope isn't silly or weak. Through a grove of oaks and across the railroad tracks behind our house lies Lincoln Marsh, where my wife and I walk whenever we get a chance, along the raised Prairie Path with cyclists and joggers and then down to the marsh itself, a microcosm of life's infinite variety and a source of inexhaustible wonder. Thirtysomething years ago, the marsh was a dump.

Copyright © 2004 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

The Evangelical Environmental Network has more information about its activities on its web site.

Other Christian Environmentalism associations include Christian Environmental Council (an offshoot of the Evangelical Environmental Network), the Interfaith Council for Environmental Stewardship, Evangelicals for Social Action and Green Cross.

More Christianity Today and Books & Culture articles on environmental stewardship include:

Environment as Creation | Conquest vs. care for the wilderness. (Books & Culture, January/February 2004)

Bald Eagles and Babies | The case for compassionate conservationism. (June 27, 2001)

next page... |  1 of 2

share this page

July (Web-only) 2004, Vol. 48