Trial lawyers have a saying, "When the law isn't on your side, argue the facts." That's what The New York Times did in early October when it made its case—through five lengthy articles and a capstone editorial—for curbing the rights of religious organizations. Its examples of religious freedom run amok were all perfectly legal, but morally questionable.

One of the newspaper's examples: A Roman Catholic order in Toledo dismissed Mary Rosati after finding she'd been diagnosed with breast cancer. Rosati claimed the order wanted to avoid the expense of caring for her. The religious order countered that it found Rosati unqualified for its way of life. Since questions of theology and spiritual calling were invoked, a district judge in Ohio dismissed Rosati's complaint.

The Times's not-so-subtle editorial-page conclusion: "The wall between church and state is being replaced by a platform that raises religious organizations to a higher legal plane than their secular counterparts." In other words, religion is taking over, while "the majority [of Americans] is not aware."

But Times editors misunderstand the basic notions embedded in the First Amendment. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion," our foremost right reads, "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The first clause forbids elevating one religious group over another. The second allows such groups free rein over their own affairs.

Congregations receive tax exemptions, not because of the public service they offer—social workers, inner-city teachers, and employees at secular nonprofits all benefit the common good while still paying taxes—but mainly because the power to tax is the power to manipulate, control, or even destroy. ...

Subscriber access only You have reached the end of this Article Preview

To continue reading, subscribe now. Subscribers have full digital access.

June
Subscribe to CT and get one year free.
Read These Next
Also in this Issue
The Importance of Knowing What's Important Subscriber Access Only
Being a counterculture for the common good begins with what we choose to focus on--and to overlook.
RecommendedTrump’s Religious Liberty Order Doesn’t Answer Most Evangelicals’ Prayers
Trump’s Religious Liberty Order Doesn’t Answer Most Evangelicals’ Prayers
Prayer breakfast pledge to ‘totally destroy’ Johnson Amendment comes up shy; conscience exemptions from LGBT anti-discrimination rules missing.
TrendingThe Theology Beneath the Trump-Comey Conflict
The Theology Beneath the Trump-Comey Conflict
How the former FBI director’s interest in Reinhold Niebuhr shaped his approach to political power.
Editor's PickBen Sasse: Adolescence Is a Gift, but Extended Adolescence Is a Trap
Ben Sasse: Adolescence Is a Gift, but Extended Adolescence Is a Trap
The Nebraska senator wants parents to get serious about shepherding kids into responsible adulthood.
Christianity Today
A Higher Amendment
hide thisDecember December

In the Magazine

December 2006

To continue reading, subscribe now for full print and digital access.