Jump directly to the content

Feature

Three Models of Hell

"Is hell nothing more than eternal torture of the unsaved? Why would God engage in punishment that seems so cruel?" -- Tony De Luca, New York, New York

God would not be party to anything as sordid as torture; Christians can agree on that. However, theologians are divided about how eternal judgment is not tantamount to such.

Two competing answers are proposed: (1) Yes, hell involves eternal pain inflicted on the unsaved, but this should not be regarded as gratuitous, unjust, or cruel; and (2) the final judgment will not involve eternal, conscious torment as has been traditionally assumed, and this misreading of biblical teaching needs modification. Both sides raise legitimate concerns worth careful consideration.

The first position is the view of most Christians. It argues that people commonly underestimate the appropriate punishment for defying an infinitely holy God. When human rebellion wrecked God's original good design, God undertook, at great cost, to restore humans to a loving relationship with himself. Those who spurn God's love deserve their eternal destiny, justly suffering the pain of God's wrath.

Of course, God alone has the right to execute this type of sentence. And God gets no sadistic enjoyment from pain he inflicts (Ezek. 18:23, 32). In righteousness and justice, God exacts deadly retribution for wickedness on those not under the blood atonement of Christ.

Other Christians argue that God would never be so seemingly punitive or vicious. They say the Bible's imagery occasionally reflects vindictive presuppositions of ancient cultures, but no one should take this imagery literally. Since rejection of God's love is reprehensible, they say, God will ultimately (and here the answers vary): overcome all evil and all resistance (universalism), destroy all evil (annihilationism), or inflict only as much pain as is necessary to extract repentance, leaving only the incorrigibly ...

Article Preview

This article is currently available to CT subscribers only.

To continue reading:
LoginorSubscribe

From Issue:
February 2007, Vol. 51, No. 2
More from Christianity Today
Los samaritanos del día de hoy

Los samaritanos del día de hoy

Jesucristo nos muestra que bajo la piel, todos somos parientes.
The 'Handicap Icon' Gets New Life

The 'Handicap Icon' Gets New Life

New York’s revamped accessibility symbol began at a Christian college.
Sponsoring a Movement

Sponsoring a Movement

Former sponsored children like Moses Pulei pay it forward in their hometowns.
Sidelining the Stigma of Mental Illness

Sidelining the Stigma of Mental Illness

Amy Simpson challenges the church to step up its ministry to a vulnerable population.
Get Instant Access
Christianity Today Magazine
Subscribe now for a year (10 issues) at $24.95 for print, iPad, and instant web access.

International Orders

Comments

Displaying 1–3 of 56 comments

Gary

February 23, 2007  7:04pm

The idea of an immortal soul comes from Greek philosophy not from Scritpure. In Gen. God breathes into Adam the breath of life and he became a "living soul (being)." The NT declares that 8 souls were saved in the ark. These were Noah and his family - living, breathing human beings, not bodiless souls. Also, God has promised to put an end to sin, to its very existence. If unsaved people were to be consigned to the flames of hell for eternity, then sin would also exist throughout eternity in them and would always be a blight on His otherwise perfect universe. Finally, at the final judgment the unrighteous are resurrected to receive their sentence which means that they are in bodily form. The human body burns. Fire burns fuel. If the flames of hell are hot enough to melt the elements, surely they would consume mere human flesh. For this not to be the case, God would have to use Divine creative power to continually re-create human bodies for eternity to keep the flames alive. God forbid!

William Stuart

February 22, 2007  5:46pm

Since universalism, annihilationism, and purgatory do not appear tenable in light of the biblical text (to me at least), the article implicilty argues for the eternal torment viewpoint. Being absent from the benevolent presence of God would surely involve such torment, and that seems consistent with the parables told by Jesus himself, and with the Book of Revelation's description of the second death.

Beth Muir

February 22, 2007  2:13pm

Isn't the idea of simply being separated from God for all eternity enough of the definition of hell for any of us? We are ever searching for this ultimate connection with Him and to have that possibility taken away forever, to me would be hell. There is nothing worse.

See All 56 Comments
You must be a Christianity Today subscriber to post comments
(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).
Login
or
Subscribe
or
Register

Don't Miss

Want to Change the World? Sponsor a Child

Want to Change the World? Sponsor a Child

A top economist shares the astounding news about that little picture hanging on our refrigerator.
Bumbling the Great Commission

Bumbling the Great Commission

Is our discipleship too narrow?

The Sightless, Wordless, Helpless Theologian

The Sightless, Wordless, Helpless Theologian

How our daughter's brief life showed us eternity.

more | current issue

Books & Culture

Our Lives, Our Fortunes, and Our Sacred Honor

Our Lives, Our Fortunes, and Our Sacred ...

The grand debate that...

Today's Christian Woman

The Perfect Wife Scorecard

The Perfect Wife Scorecard

I just knew I was failing...

Small Groups

Silence and Solitude

Silence and Solitude

These spiritual disciplines...

Out of Ur

Superman: Sermon Notes from Exile

Superman: Sermon Notes from Exile

Why I wrote sermon notes...

Facebook

CT eBooks & Bible Studies


Shopping