Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
May 12, 2008
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Home > 2007 > NovemberChristianity Today, November, 2007  |   |  
The Evangelical Elite
Michael Lindsay says adherents of the movement can now be found in powerful positions in every niche of American life.



ADVERTISEMENT

For decades, evangelicals have lamented their lack of representation or respect in politics, media, education, and business. Michael Lindsay, a sociology professor at Rice University, says that's no longer true. His latest book, Faith in the Halls of Power: How Evangelicals Joined the American Elite, reflects an unparalleled degree of research of evangelicals in high-profile leadership positions. Christianity Today senior writer Tim Stafford interviewed Lindsay to find out what he learned about today's newly empowered evangelicals.

You conducted 360 in-depth interviews with American evangelical leaders from every walk of life. What prompted you?

In the late 1990s, I was working for the Gallup Institute as a consultant on religion and culture. One of my responsibilities was to handle media inquiries. In the run-up to the 2000 election, there were lots of calls from reporters saying, "I need the numbers on evangelicals and how they have grown over the last 30 years." And as I looked into it, I realized that the number of Americans who self-identified as evangelicals hadn't changed much. What had changed was that evangelicals had become much more prominent. And that got me wondering what was going on.

The media's portrait of evangelicals has focused on the obvious—popular evangelicalism. Yet you found something distinct, a hidden evangelicalism.

I wouldn't say hidden, so much as one that's less understood, more behind the scenes … what one person I interviewed called "move-the-dial" Christianity—folks who have their hands on commanding positions of American society. Just by their very presence, they have the ability to affect public institutions—for instance, the way a corporate mission statement is worded, or how an educational institution is run. I found a cohort of folks who identify with American evangelicalism, but who are not quite into the bombast or the placard-bearing Christianity that is sometimes associated with evangelicalism. They were subtler and quieter, but frankly higher-ranking and more powerful.

How powerful? How influential?

The big story line is that evangelical influence in America is a lot more than people think, and yet a lot less than people think. It's more than people think, because evangelicalism is a faith that penetrates to the core of the believer's identity in such a way that if one wants to be faithful and be an artist or a producer in Hollywood, then invariably, his or her faith has to come to bear on those kinds of things. It's something you can't check at the door. So evangelical influence is not just pervasive in Washington, but at Harvard, in Hollywood, on Wall Street, and in Silicon Valley.

But it's a lot less than people think because there's not some unified strategy to co-opt or take over the country. Even if evangelicals wanted to do that (which I don't find that they do), there's too much diversity in the movement; the differences of opinion are too great. There's a lot of space between Rick Warren and Pat Robertson, between Joel Osteen and George Bush. I find no evidence of some vast, right-wing conspiracy being coordinated by evangelical power brokers.

How are these evangelicals different from more "populist" evangelicals?

The cosmopolitan evangelicals I write about are people who are just as committed to their faith, just as involved in mainstream evangelical life. By and large, they are very orthodox in their beliefs. Yet they rub shoulders with a much more diverse population. They're far from insular or inward-focused. The majority of their working day is spent with people of different faiths or of no faith. They have reached higher levels of education. One in ten of those whom I interviewed earned a degree at Harvard, either undergraduate or graduate. It's a very elite group, but it's not really about class sensibility—it's more about an orientation to the world. They read Christianity Today, but they also read The New York Times. They might go to a Christian rock concert, but they also go to the symphony. And they have a broadmindedness that goes alongside their faith.





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 28 comments.See all comments
tony   Posted: November 17, 2007 11:13 AM
Christianity is Dead! Long live Christianity!

Raymond Takashi Swenson   Posted: November 16, 2007 7:17 PM
Perhaps a comparison can be useful. Mitt Romney has drawn attention to "elite Mormons" in politics, business and academia. Like Romney, many attended Harvard, Stanford, etc. Here are differences: Latter-day Saints attend congregations based on their geographic location, so elite Mormons attend church with Mormons of all economic levels. There is no gap between elite Mormons and pastors because the elite Mormons ARE the pastors, serving as part-time (20+ hours a week) unpaid temporary leaders (up to 5 years). Romney headed a congregation and then all congregations in Boston, ministering to the poor and spiritually troubled and overseeing missionary efforts. Church finances are equalized for all congregations to promote brotherhood. Most elite Mormons served two years as missionaries, and many of Romney's peers donate 3 years to lead 150-200 young missionaries overseas. Senior Church leaders (apostles, etc.) are called from these elites! The Mormon elites ARE the Mormon leaders.

Robert   Posted: November 18, 2007 12:57 PM
RJR_fan - I've read the work of Chilton, including "Productive Christians in an Age of Guilt Manipulators" and found it to be a shrill justification of the "pull yourself up by the boot straps" religion that is antithetical to the teachings of Jesus. This is not to endorse Snider's books, but to point out the obvious, material blessing is fortuitous and determined not by one's faith, but the fortuity of one's birth. That American Christians are so obviously blind to this reality is a tribute to their selfish belief that God has some how blessed them with abundance while he has some how forgotten to bless those who were not fortunate enough to have been born into a Western, Liberal Democracy which rewards discipline, hard word, entrepreneurial pursuits and risk taking, as well as the exploitation of less sophisticated people without access to credit, capital and subject to the corrupt behavior of their political leaders who deny them the opportunities we have in democratic countries.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christian History & Biography
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Ignite Your Faith
Leadership Journal
Marriage Partnership
Men of Integrity
Today's Christian
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com