Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
February 10, 2010
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2008 > FebruaryChristianity Today, February, 2008  |   |  
TULIP Blooming
Southern Baptist seminaries re-introduce Calvinism to a wary denomination.



ADVERTISEMENT

The pastor of First Baptist Church in Pauls Valley, Oklahoma, for 27 years, Joe Elam only encountered Calvinism once during his ministry—and it left a bitter taste in his mouth.

Though forbidden to do so, a former youth pastor at his church secretly taught predestination to teens, Elam said, sowing seeds of lingering division among several families.

"It was a wake-up call for us," said Elam, who recently led the Arbuckle Baptist Association to adopt a motion calling on the Baptist General Convention of Oklahoma to rebuke Reformed theology. It sent copies of the motion to all members of the Southern Baptist Convention's executive committee.

"We would like to see Southern Baptists become aware that [their] money is being used to teach Calvinism in our seminaries," Elam said.

That secret may already be out. Although only 10 percent of SBC pastors identify themselves as Calvinists, nearly 30 percent of recent seminary graduates do, a groundswell that could spark more Oklahoma-like conflicts. Some of the denomination's leading Reformed thinkers come from Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky, including its president, Al Mohler, and Tom Nettles, coauthor of Baptists and the Bible, a seminal text in the SBC's conservative resurgence.

Long considered more Arminian in orientation—emphasizing an individual's need to respond to the gospel rather than God's election in salvation—the nation's largest Protestant denomination is grappling with doctrines of grace and election amid a seminary-led revival.

Last November, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary in Wake Forest, North Carolina, co-hosted a conference entitled "Building Bridges: Southern Baptists and Calvinism," which brought 550 registrants to hear leading SBC figures offer differing assessments of the nascent movement.

Calvinist growth isn't unique to the SBC, reflecting a broader stirring among evangelicals sparked by popular pastors such as John Piper, R. C. Sproul, and John MacArthur. (For a transdenominational look at the Reformed revival, see "Young, Restless, Reformed," CT, Sept. 2007.)

"Southern Baptists go to their conferences, read their books, and listen to their radio programs and CDs," said Timothy George, dean of Beeson Divinity School at Samford University. "That has spawned an interest in Reformed theology."

sbc president Frank Page thinks Calvinism will increasingly become a source of contention.

"What we're seeing across the nation is that it's not being discussed enough," said the South Carolina pastor. "Candidates and churches are being put together, and it immediately becomes apparent they've got a serious issue of disagreement."

However, George doesn't believe the issue will divide the convention. "We ought to be able to talk about it, discuss it, even debate it, in a way that doesn't require anybody to compromise their convictions, but which also doesn't make this a test of fellowship," said George, a Calvinist.

Mohler said a deepening interest in theology is driving younger Southern Baptists to explore Reformed thinking, and he dismisses the fear of some that the budding Calvinist wing will tilt the SBC back toward its 19th-century anti-missionary movement.

"Southern Baptists are not going to accept any theology that would in any way reduce our evangelistic zeal or missions commitment," Mohler said.

Page isn't so sure. While acknowledging that both sides seek to uphold biblical truth, Page worries that extremists could undermine the SBC's emphasis on outreach. He isn't impressed by arguments that most convention founders embraced Reformed ideas.

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 41 comments.See all comments
Jim   Posted: January 24, 2008 2:13 PM
It sems an odd fear that the SBC will lose its "evangelistic" approach if it embraces Reformed theology. A lot of SBC churches use Evangelism Explosion, the most successful evangelistic curriculum of the past few decades. It was written and its ministry built by Dr. D James Kennedy, a Reformed pastor in the PCA. Raised a Southern Baptist, I find that there is a lot of fear in the SBC not truly because Reformed theology leads to a false "certainty" (as Robert proposes) or to antinomianism (as Leslie contends), but rather that it requires Christians to believe the Bible and that God meant what He said when He said "I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy" and Jesus, when He said "You did not choose me, but I chose you." I've met many SBC'rs who practically believe that the assurance of their faith comes not, ultimately, in God's grace, or Christ's work on the Cross, but in their own personal confession of Christ, which is a work. They stumble on Mt 7:22-23 and a lot else.

Ally K   Posted: January 23, 2008 1:11 PM
What Robert said! I am not Baptist, but I attended a Southern Baptist college. I won't say that while I was there, Calvinism grew like a cancer, but that's a pretty close analogy. It was the most divisive thing I have ever seen. As an Arminian, I was told that if I had truly "studied and shown myself approved", there was no way I could remain an Arminian. I was also told that as an Arminian, I did not believe that God is sovreign. These comments prompted further study of the scriptures and of Calvinism. I am more sure than ever that God created us as free will agents and that our destination for eternity is our choice, and that God can remain fully sovreign while giving us that choice.

PW   Posted: January 22, 2008 8:15 PM
If one desires to understand issues surrounding Arminianism, Calvinism, TULIP, Election and Predestination, etc. from opposing theological perspectives, I strongly suggest “The Potters Freedom” (TPF) by James R. White for the conservative Calvinist view and “Chosen But Free” (CBF) by Norman Geisler. White’s “TPF” was written as a rebuttal to Geisler’s “CBF”. Both extensively lay out their cases with pertinent verses we’ve all seen used and debated. To me, Geisler’s “Moderate Calvinism” (by far) makes the most sense while remaining balanced and Scripturally defensible – it AFFIRMS God’s SOVEREIGNTY as well as MAN’S RESPONSIBILITY while also exposing the heresies of both “Extreme Calvinist” views AS WELL AS THOSE OF ARMINIAN ONES. The updated version of CBF directly responds to White’s TPF most convincingly. Geisler provides perspectives of historical church fathers, key theologians like Spurgeon and Sproul as well as an EXHAUSTIVE examination of relevant Scriptures.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com