Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
May 16, 2008
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Home > 2008 > February (Web-only)Christianity Today, February (Web-only), 2008  |   |  
Out of Africa
Thomas Oden reminds us of classical Christianity's debt to Africa in How Africa Shaped the Christian Mind.



ADVERTISEMENT

A few years ago, an African-American friend and I were discussing a popular black pastor whose doctrine of the Trinity just wasn't orthodox. My colleague thought Christianity Today should give the man a pass. After all, he was doing good ministry and the fine points of the Trinity were just more of that dead-white-European-male baggage.

I hadn't thought of it before that moment, but suddenly I had a flash: Athanasius, the architect of Trinitarian orthodoxy, was African, not European. (So, of course, was Arius, the heretic who drove Athanasius to distraction.)

I took the opportunity to remind my colleague that orthodoxy arose out of the African context.

Indeed, many of the shapers of Christian orthodoxy were African. Names like Augustine, Tertullian, Origen, Clement, Anthony, and Pachomius were familiar from my undergraduate church-history survey. But my professor had not presented them as Africans ministering and teaching in the context of an African culture.

That common omission is what theologian Thomas C. Oden wants to address with the Early African Christianity Project as well as with his book, How Africa Shaped the Christian Mind (IVP, 2007).

The title of Oden's book suggests a parallel to Tom Cahill's How the Irish Saved Civilization. That's unfortunate, because readers may expect Oden to play the raconteur in the Cahill manner. Instead, How Africa Shaped the Christian Mind is an outline and an agenda for research. (The agenda genre is classic forward-thinking Oden, who has devoted other books to outlining where theologians should be turning their attention.)

Classical African Christianity, claims Oden, has been ignored — or treated as something other than African. Augustine, Athanasius, Tertullian, and others have been treated as Europeans in disguise.

The story of Christian theology has been told from a European perspective. Oden wants to tell that story differently: classical Christian theology was heavily shaped by Africans. The language we use to worship the Trinity, the received definitions of the Christ's two natures, the early church's methods for restoring repentant sinners, the basic patterns of monastic life, our fundamental approach to biblical interpretation, the church's devotion to its martyrs — all of these things have their roots in African theological debate, African prayer, and African biblical study.

The movement was from south to north. Concepts hatched in Alexandria or Carthage were appropriated in Constantinople, Rome, or Milan. Eventually, Arab Islamic expansion across north Africa drove many Christians from their native soil. The result is that some of what Cahill's Irish monks preserved was in fact African. Writes Oden:

There is little doubt that Irish Christianity sustained strong African and monastic motifs in its piety, hagiography and temperament. This can be seen visually in its crosses, funerary objects, décor, calendars and art forms, as well as literarily in poetry, song and preaching.

Oden theorizes that as the scholarly monks who followed the rules of Pachomius and Augustine were driven out of Africa by the Vandal and Arab invasions, they migrated to Sicily and the little island of Lérins off the coast of France. From there came the influences that shaped Irish monasticism. That monasticism, as Cahill tells the story, eventually shaped European Christianity, which in turn sent missionaries back to Africa.

But even before the seventh-century Muslim conquest, the influence flowed from south to north. Not only theologians like Athanasius, but influential rhetors (the Greek term for professional orators) like Augustine and Tertullian brought distinctly African patterns of argument to Rome. Throughout this book, Oden asserts the significance of the African context for the contributions of these key figures. Then he repeatedly appeals to African scholars to document and analyze the material in its African context.





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 7 comments.See all comments
Warren   Posted: February 29, 2008 5:32 PM
Although I haven't read the book, it occurs to me that there are distinctly different Africas. Sub-saharan Africa is what most people think of when you mention "Africa." The early church Fathers, although technically from Africa would seem to be more a part of Europe and Asia Minor, as it seems Egyptians are today. (And, of course, S. Africa is an entirely different situation.)

Jason Evans   Posted: February 29, 2008 5:51 PM
I look forward to reading Oden's new work. Athanasius, Origen, and Tertullian were from the continent of Africa. However, I think it a bit misleading to use this fact as a reason to woe African Americans Christians to orthodoxy. I all for orthodoxy with orthopraxis. Right doctrine and right action goes hand in hand. White evangelicalism fails to see this is why African American Christians won't cross the line of racial reconciliation. They'll take the orthodoxy of evangelicals, but question the praxis. It's what Jesus taught the disciples; he taught them to listen and obey the words of the Pharisees, but don't follow their actions because they don't practices what they preach.

Mike Yoder   Posted: March 04, 2008 9:57 AM
Warren's point it well-taken. It is probably better to think of the northern European world, the Mediterranean world, and the sub-Saharan African world. What Neff (and Oden) refer to seems to be the Mediterranean world, whether on the southern coast, northern coast, or both. That we today refer to these geographical regions as an almost mutually exclusive Europe or Africa, and all of the connatations thereof, does not negate the unique nature of a Mediterranean culture and faith in the centuries during and after Christ. When that is overlooked, we tend to read contemporary "Africa" back into the historical record, complete with all of our understandings of race, historical injustices, and the more recent Christian awakening. Otherwise, Neff's review is fascinating, and the reader is motivated to see what insights Oden offers us in his surely well-written book.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christian History & Biography
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Church Secretary Today
Ignite Your Faith
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Today's Christian
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com