Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
May 26, 2012

Home > 2009 > October (Web-Only)Christianity Today, October (Web-Only), 2009
Political Advocacy Tracker
Health Care Cacophony
Plus: D.C. debates gay marriage, President Obama approves a new hate crimes law, and other issues advocacy groups were talking about this week.




Health Care Ads and Arguments

House Democrats introduced their nearly 2,000-page health-care reform plan today as Sojourners and the Family Research Council (FRC) rolled out two very different ads on health care earlier this week. The Sojourners ad invokes moral language, including phrases like "bear false witness" that allude to scriptural passages as it advocates for health care reform. The video, created in partnership with the American Values Network, features a series of nighttime photographs of people waiting at a free health clinic.

The narrator talks about "the millions of Americans who wait for health care reform," saying, "they are God's children, and they have a face."

"While the politicians bear false witness about reform, they wait," the voice-over continues. "While special interests reap the profits of fear, they wait. While angry protesters silence dialogue, they wait. … The time for health reform is now."

In contrast, the FRC ad could be mistaken as the product of a budget-hawk, anti-deficit action group. Previous FRC Action ads focused on "the moral, ethical and financial dangers of the President's Health Reform Plan."

In FRC's ad, a young boy asks if the grandfather is "still on the list" for his surgery, and whether it is expensive. The grandfather nods and explains that the surgery is free because the government is going to pay for it.

The grandson replies, "Daddy says nothing is for free. Who's going to pay for it?"

The background music changes from a few stark piano chords to a light, playful melody.

"You are," the grandfather scoffs. "You're late for work!"

The grandson then gets ready for his white-collar job as a narrator explains that "government-run health care would leave our children to pay for one trillion dollars of additional debt. They'd better grow up quickly."

This ad, which is being broadcast in Washington, D.C., does not include any discussion of federal funding of abortion, but this does not mean the group is no longer concerned about abortion funding. FRC Action provides a "clear conscience" website with information on abortion funding, a petition, and opportunities to contribute to FRC Action's efforts.

Focus on the Family Action's Ashley Horne said, "Congress needs a wake-up call," as most Americans oppose federal funding of abortions, and Focus has 150,000 signatures on its petition to oppose such funding.

Americans United for Life also continued their call for President Obama to "stop making false claims that abortion funding is somehow already prohibited" and to veto legislation lacking "explicit language prohibiting abortion funding."

Ken Connor of the Center for a Just Society emphasized the "ominous implications" that government-run health care would have for end-of-life care. With government-run health care, the doctor-patient relationship would be replaced by protocols that would emphasize cost cutting over the needs of individual patients, he argued.

Doug Carlson of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics & Religious Liberty Comission (ERLC) argued for the need for more transparency in the legislative process. "Arcane and legalistic or not, the stakes are high," Carlson wrote. "The drivers of health care reform are intent on providing federal coverage for abortion, as well as including a government-run option, which would possibly slash Medicare benefits, raise health care premiums, and crowd out private insurance. A little transparency should not be too much to ask."

Andrea Lafferty of the Traditional Values Coalition was more pointed in her criticism of the lack of transparency. "Obama is acting more like a Soviet bureaucrat than a man who believes in the democratic process," she said.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Glenda

November 02, 2009  9:23am

I find something very odd about what so many of us Christians are worried about in regard to the hate crimes bill's passage. We are worried that, if an individual or group commits a physical crime against a gay person (or someone perceived by the individual or group to be gay) after hearing a sermon condemning homosexuality, that the preacher will have that used against him legally. Is this really what we are worried about? Is this our way to condone speech against one of God's peoples? Are we saying that there is no accountability for the preacher who stirs up anger and anxiety against gay people, that if one of his followers take his word literally (as so many of us take the Bible), it is okay? This doesn't feel Christian to me. Please enlighten me, if you will.

Jeff Coe

November 01, 2009  1:14pm

Roger funny I had a conversation with a guy in the sauna of all places. He lived in Japan with his wife for 13 years who is Japanese. He said if he got sick and used their system he had to pay 25.00, his wife 5.00 and the longest he had to wait was a little over an hour for a broken finger. He got laid off and had health care for 30 days when he came back to the states. His bill today is 743.00 a month. The issue is that organizations like FRC Focus on the Family have their own agenda and sadly that has gotten mixed up for Republican politics. These "moral" men and women will stop and nothing to make sure that President Obama looses in any way he can. Much like the Republicans in office being the total party of "no". And sad to me that way too many evangelicals instead of honestly looking at the issues and being informed let others do the hard work and speak for them. The US should and needs to have the best health care in the world and any Christian that decrys that is a hypocrite.

American Marriage Ministries

November 01, 2009  11:54am

Roger, I really liked your comment. It is good to know that people whether you are on the right or left, you do not have to be an extremist. Too bad you live in Australia. What is your position on same-sex marriage?

Roger Gallagher

October 31, 2009  8:32am

Australian evangelicals like myself struggle to understand the opposition from some American evangelicals towards President Obama's health care reforms. They seem quite modest compared to the Medicare programme run by the Australian Government for the past 25 years. The Australian Health Care system is far from perfect, yet it enables all Australians, regardless of income, to receive decent health care without crippling health care bills. And this has been done without sending the Commonwealth Government broke - we have a deficit this year, but that's due to the GFC, not health care.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



War and Peace

War and Peace

Pastor Tullian Tchividjian survived a leadership coup by finding rest in the liberating power of the gospel.

Facing Fears

Facing Fears

Max Lucado employs preaching to overcome fear.

more | current issue

Christian Bible Studies

Unbalanced Blessings

Unbalanced Blessings

The balancing act of...

Books & Culture

Quiet

Quiet

Shhh! Introverts working...

Preaching Today

NFL Star Junior Seau Searched for Peace

Small Groups

Prepare with Prayer

Prepare with Prayer

Don't leave out this...

Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper