How to Remove Our Bible-Reading Blinders
The cover of Misreading Scripture with Western Eyes: Removing Cultural Blinders to Better Understand the Bible (InterVarsity) is striking. Authors E. Randolph Richards (dean of the School of Christian Ministry at Palm Beach Atlantic University) and Brandon J. O'Brien (an editor at large for Leadership Journal) have us look at a white, male face, gazing outward from behind a printed page, eyes covered by blue-tinted glasses. The message is clear, as is the overarching message of the book: North American evangelicals "read" the Bible—and the world—through Western eyes. This insight is now commonplace in discussions about biblical interpretation in popular and academic circles, as Richards and O'Brien readily admit. Indeed, all human beings come to the Bible with cultural "habits," deeply ingrained patterns of interpreting the world that inevitably shape—and sometimes warp—our interpretation and understanding of Scripture.
Richards and O'Brien want to help Western readers recognize more fully how the eyeglasses through which we view and interpret everything in our environment—Western culture—often influence our understanding of specific biblical texts and themes. To read Scripture well, we must read ourselves and our culture well. Picture an iceberg looming in the distance as a metaphor for our worldview, a key illustration Richards and O'Brien employ throughout their book. How much of an iceberg do we actually see? Well, as the captain of the Titanic sadly experienced, very little. The tip pokes up through the water, announcing its presence to all with eyes to see, but the iceberg's immensity lurks undetected in the depths. Similarly, our perceptions of our own culture's patterns and pressures—"what we wear, eat, say and consciously believe"—is only the tip of the iceberg. "The majority" of our cultural patterns lurk "below the surface, out of plain sight, beyond our conscious awareness."
Me-Centered Approach
Richards and O'Brien help us to understand the cultural dynamics Western Christians experience and manifest as they read the Bible. Clearly, our experiences shape our reading of the Bible; we are all wearing tinted glasses, lenses that help us to see some things very clearly but distort our vision elsewhere. Think, for instance, of the parable of the Prodigal Son. When 100 North American students were asked to read the parable and retell it, only six mentioned the famine the prodigal experiences away from home. In a word, American readers tend to be "famine-forgetters," perhaps because most Americans simply have not experienced terrible famine. Compare the response of 50 Russian readers to the very same parable: 42 out of 50 mentioned the famine. Why? The cultural history of famine in World War II has deeply embedded itself in the Russian consciousness, and this cultural lens influences what Russian Christians see in a biblical text.
The Latest in Movie News, May 23, 2013

God Among the Roma

Grieving with the Good Friday God

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).












Comments
Displaying 13 of 35 comments
See all comments
Claire Guest
Chris Hearn, it seems likely that the United States could cease to exist as a country before the end of the world, based on what is written in the Revelation. The USA has been under the judgment of God for at least 20 years, because of legalization of abortion and other issues. I do believe there will always be a faithful remnant who refuse to bow the knee to any other god. The gates of Hell will never prevail against those who are truly His, who seek the kingdom of God above all else.
Chris Hearn
My current favorite cultural take on the Bible is the following- The United States will cease to exist as a country at the end of the world, because nowhere is it mentioned in the Book of Revelation.
gordon payne
Hmm, wonder what the Bible has to say about this 'philosophical' perspective? For one thing, it clearly reveals desolation as a consequence of unbelief - can we be surprised at the Russian results, particularly the focus? And it clearly reveals that, without true belief, people get wrapped up in their own intellectual underwear, like discriminating on the basis of national or socio-economic background. The Bible addresses carnal man in every condition. Taken seriously, there is no escaping the message of the Prodigal son, regardless of one's background, and there to an anchor in an 'objectivity' of truth, derived, not by critical devaluation, but from wholesome revelation, and there by credible parable. One should prefer Boudinot to Paine, fact over abstraction, and there without relying on statistics, much less statistical norms derived from underlying abstractions going to basic denial as presumption. And, as should be known, presumption does not find sympathy in Scripture.