News

Crisis of Faith Statements

Does it matter ‘why’ Christian professors agree with their colleges’ doctrine?

Crisis of Faith Statements

Crisis of Faith Statements

Jeremy Mikkola / Flickr

Less than a year after Cedarville University hired theologian Michael Pahl, administrators relieved the associate professor of his teaching duties.

The issue at stake? A historical Adam and Eve, a debate that dates back to Augustine and has recently cropped up at evangelical schools such as Calvin College and Reformed Theological Seminary. But what appears new in Cedarville's situation is the trustees' requirement that faculty hold particular beliefs for particular reasons.

Pahl affirms the Ohio school's doctrinal statement (recently augmented by trustees via theological white papers) regarding human origins, but his beliefs are based on a literary reading of Genesis 1 and 2.

"I hold to a historical Adam and Eve, though not on exegetical grounds," Pahl wrote in his defense to trustees, which CT obtained. "My reasons are more theological in nature…." Later, when explaining his take on Paul's use of Adam and Genesis, Pahl stated, "Once again we are in an area of academic freedom as the doctrinal statement does not mandate specific exegesis of specific biblical passages."

Yet Cedarville administrators concluded that the theologian "is unable to concur fully with each and every position" of its doctrinal stance, according to an official statement they released with Pahl.

"It doesn't make sense," said Christian philosopher Alvin Plantinga. "It does damage to a college atmosphere to pretend there's no sensible diversity of opinion among Christians."

Last year, Calvin College experienced similar debate when its board of trustees investigated tenured professors of religion Daniel Harlow and John Schneider after they published controversial articles that questioned the existence of a historical Adam. Both professors were accused of violating the confession of the affiliated Christian Reformed Church; the professors countered that their deans and provost had approved plans to publish their work.

Schneider retired to pursue his research, and Harlow's employment was not terminated. But questions of confessional adherence and scholarly research linger, said David Hoekema, chair of the philosophy department at Calvin. "Those are hard issues," he said. "We are working [to] clarify what for us are things we can explore freely and things that are not open for challenge."

Many Christian schools now expect their faculty scholars to produce original research in much greater quantities than in the past, said Indiana Wesleyan University's Todd Ream, editor of Beyond Integration: Interdisciplinary Possibilities for the Future of Christian Higher Education.

"By virtue of sheer volume," he said, "these kinds of questions concerning faith statements and academic freedom are likely to emerge with greater frequency than in previous generations."

Yet based on university bylaws, trustees likely are not obligated to consult with faculty when trying to clarify doctrinal tenets, said Hoekema, who coauthored a 2009 American Association of University Professors report regarding Cedarville's 2007 firing of tenured Bible professor David Hoffeditz. He recalls previous instances in which trustees imposed "documents of ambiguous force" upon faculty, though none as formal as Cedarville's recent white papers.

Cedarville faculty were to understand the white papers simply as part of the doctrinal statement, according to academic vice president Tom Cornman. "We're not attempting to say these define orthodoxy," he said. "These define our identity within orthodoxy."

Christian historian George Marsden says this type of situation is perennial. In cases where two or more parties both affirm a statement and still have different interpretations of what that statement really intends, trustees may try to "rein the faculty in," he said.

But Joe Ricke, professor of English at Taylor University and author of an essay published in The Christian College Phenomenon entited "The Hesitants Among Us: The Tightrope Act of Christian Scholarship," says it does not work to say that white papers simply restate positions implied in a doctrinal statement.

"If that's really true, you don't need a white paper," he said.

However, times may arise when faith statements actually need clarification or revision, Ream says. Just as important as the content of any revisions, he says, is the manner in which they are generated.

"In essence, they should arise initially from significant stakeholders in the community and then be brought to relevant members of the larger community for their input and approval," he said.

Hoekema agrees. "These are questions of interpretation," he said. "Whether you're in a Lutheran or Catholic institution, or a Baptist or Pentecostal college," he said, "people whose academic specialty bears on these questions should not just be permitted, but should be encouraged to raise questions to keep the debate going."

Editor's note: This article has been updated and expanded.

Also in this issue

The CT archives are a rich treasure of biblical wisdom and insight from our past. Some things we would say differently today, and some stances we've changed. But overall, we're amazed at how relevant so much of this content is. We trust that you'll find it a helpful resource.

Cover Story

Honoring Faith in the Public Square

The Mystic Baptist

Review

How to Remove Our Bible-Reading Blinders

Excerpt

Why Love Never Ends

Review

The Need for Creeds

Shari'ah's Uphill Climb

God Did It

The Key to a Purposeful Life

'Fringe' Has Always Been About Playing God

What Is the Biggest Change Evangelical Seminaries Need to Make Right Now?

News

Church and State for the Homeless

How Gabriel Wilson Discovered his Paternal Roots—and Made a Record About It

Jamie Grace Is Holding On

The Truth About World War II's True Shepherds

News

The Trouble with TBN

News

Should Seminary Professors Be Granted Tenure?

News

Christians Fight Israel's Marriage Ban

Editorial

How to Unfreeze the Middle East

What to Watch For on Election Night

This (Ambiguous) Political Life

News

Doubting China's One-Child Policy Change

Review

Review: The Church In An Age of Crisis

Review

Review: Amplifying Our Witness

Wilson's Bookmarks

My Top 5 Books on Homosexuality

Sacrilege Is Real

Letters to the Editor

News

Go Figure

News

Quotation Marks

News

Gleanings

Our 'Call'

Questions That Drive Us

View issue

Our Latest

News

Ghana May Elect Its First Muslim President. Its Christian Majority Is Torn.

Church leaders weigh competency and faith background as the West African nation heads to the polls.

Shamanism in Indonesia

Can Christians practice ‘white knowledge’ to heal the sick and exorcize demons?

Shamanism in Japan

Christians in the country view pastors’ benedictions as powerful spiritual mantras.

Shamanism in Taiwan

In a land teeming with ghosts, is there room for the Holy Spirit to work?

Shamanism in Vietnam

Folk religion has shaped believers’ perceptions of God as a genie in a lamp.

Shamanism in the Philippines

Filipinos’ desire to connect with the supernatural shouldn’t be eradicated, but transformed and redirected toward Christ.

Shamanism in South Korea

Why Christians in the country hold onto trees while praying outdoors.

Shamanism in Thailand

When guardian spirits disrupt river baptisms, how can believers respond?

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube