Guest / Limited Access /
I Know Why the Government Went after Pro-Life Investigative Journalists
Center for Medical Progress / YouTube

Last week, a Texas grand jury indicted activists David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt for allegedly using fake IDs and attempting to buy fetal tissue. Both of the Center for Medical Progress, the pair concealed their identities while attempting to frame/highlight the willingness of Planned Parenthood employees to sell fetal tissue, capturing their conversations on a series of videos first released last summer. Christianity Today reached out to Daniel K. Williams, a historian of the pro-life movement, and Focus on the Family president Jim Daly to provide their perspective on the ethics of the pairs’ actions.

I watched in horror last year as undercover videos from the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) surfaced showing the alleged sale of baby body parts by executives at the nation’s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood.

A few months later, I’m shaking my head in disbelief over reports that a Texas grand jury has indicted CMP’s David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt.

The charges?

Tampering with a government document—in other words, using a fake ID—and attempting to buy fetal tissue.

The first offense is one for which minors around the country are regularly treated with a proverbial slap on the wrist—yet Daleiden and Merritt are facing felony charges. Meanwhile, Daleiden’s misdemeanor charge of attempting to purchase of human tissue seems to beg the question: why aren’t the alleged sellers being held to account?

This is a breathtaking example of government hypocrisy. The situation facing CMP is evidence of the upside-down understanding of right and wrong in our culture. How else can we explain it when we are provided seemingly irrefutable proof of heinous crimes being committed against the most vulnerable among us, and rather than investigating the wrongdoers, we attack the messenger?

We also must ask why, as citizen journalists, Daleiden and Merritt are not protected by the same laws that have shielded countless of their fellow reporters down through the years. Undercover journalism is nothing new. To the contrary, it has been used time and time again to expose criminal activity, and it is widely accepted as a journalistic practice.

For instance, in an effort to expose racial discrimination with regard to housing and hiring practices, civil rights agencies have often hired undercover “testers” to pose as job or housing applicants. Identities are therefore falsified with an eye toward bringing to justice those who are breaking the law.

And we can’t ignore the numerous investigative news programs that feature undercover work by journalists. I have no legal background, but it’s hard to see a difference between these scenarios and the undercover work Daleiden and Merritt were doing—except, perhaps, that they were seeking to shed light on the inner workings of one of the most powerful and politically connected organizations in the nation.

It’s a chilling use of state and federal power to impede the investigation. And for millions of Americans who are determined to live according to our deeply held beliefs and to speak out, in many cases the price tag for doing so is becoming increasingly steep.

Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission president Russell Moore and I had the opportunity to interview Daleiden during the recent Evangelicals for Life conference in Washington, D.C., and I was impressed by the unwavering strength of his convictions, his eloquence, and his calm demeanor in the face of the hostility being leveled against him. Although the indictment had not been announced, at the time we sat down with him he was already facing a civil suit by Planned Parenthood over the videos. Nonetheless, Daleiden expressed sincere love and compassion—not just for the unborn babies being treated in such horrific and calloused ways, but also for the Planned Parenthood workers responsible for those acts.

Support our work. Subscribe to CT and get one year free.
Read These NextSee Our Latest
Current IssueWhy Married Sex Is Social Justice
Subscriber Access Only
Why Married Sex Is Social Justice
It’s not only a solid biblical model—it’s also good for human flourishing.
RecommendedAndy Crouch: Stop Engaging 'The Culture,' Because It Doesn't Exist
Subscriber Access Only Andy Crouch: Stop Engaging 'The Culture,' Because It Doesn't Exist
We should spend more time loving our flesh-and-blood neighbor.
TrendingDobson Endorses Trump, While Evangelical Leaders Advise Voting for Lesser Evil
Dobson Endorses Trump, While Evangelical Leaders Advise Voting for Lesser Evil
Pew tracks how many evangelicals came to pick Trump for president.
Editor's PickMy Encounter with Ken Ham's Giant Ark
My Encounter with Ken Ham's Giant Ark
A four-hour visit to the massive replica of Noah's boat left me with a flood of questions.
View this article in Reader Mode
Christianity Today
I Know Why the Government Went after Pro-Life Investigative ...