Establishment Clause Issues Examined

The First Amendment’s Establishment Clause is really quite simple: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” But religious groups, civil libertarians, and even Supreme Court justices continue to differ over exactly what that means. This spring, two key religion cases could afford the high court an opportunity to provide new definitions for proper church and state boundaries.

Since 1971, the Court has used the so-called Lemon test to determine whether a government action constituted the establishment of religion. Under that framework, a government action must have a “secular purpose,” its primary effect must neither advance nor inhibit religion, and it must not foster “excessive government entanglement with religion.”

In Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District, justices are considering whether the state of Arizona should have provided a sign-language interpreter for a deaf student who attended a Catholic school. Under the federal Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, James Zobrest was eligible for such a government-financed interpreter.

School district attorney John Richardson told the Court, “We draw the line at a public employee … going to work and conveying to Jimmy Zobrest that Jesus Christ was the son of God and died to save his sins.”

However, attorney William Bentley Ball, arguing for the Zobrest family, said the Establishment Clause would not have been violated because an interpreter merely would be “serving as this child’s ears,” enabling the child to hear, not advancing religion.

Bradley Jacob, executive director of the Christian Legal Society (CLS), said the issue is fair treatment for religious students. “Every other deaf student in Arizona is entitled to a sign interpreter at public expense, but because Jimmy’s parents wanted him to go to a Catholic school, he lost out.”

Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State said, “We could see the floodgates open to a wide variety of public tax dollars flowing to religious schools all over the United States in a fundamental violation of the principle that the taxpayers of America should not be paying for sectarian religious education.”

In Lamb’s Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District, the question is whether a public school that leases its building to community groups after hours may deny access to a church. The New York school district refused to allow Lamb’s Chapel to use the building to show a film series produced by Focus on the Family. School attorney John Hoefling argued that the facility was a “limited public forum,” which could keep some groups out. He said the policy decided to keep religious groups out in an effort to avoid “establishment problems and entanglement problems.” He admitted the school would allow antireligious groups use of the school.

Lamb’s Chapel attorney Jay Sekulow said religious use of the school would be permissible under three First Amendment principles.

Our Latest

The Just Life with Benjamin Watson

Cornel West: Justice, Not Revenge

Exploring how love grounds justice, courage resists fear, and faith shapes public action.

A Quiet Life Sets Up a Loud Testimony

Excellence and steady faithfulness may win the culture war.

News

Survey: Evangelicals Contradict Their Own Convictions

A new State of the Theology report shows consensus around core beliefs but also lots of confusion.

Public Theology Project

What Horror Stories Can (and Cannot) Tell Us About the World

We want meaning and resolution—and the kind of monster we can defeat.

The Russell Moore Show

Paul Kingsnorth on the Dark Powers Behind AI

Are we summoning demons through our machines?

Welcome to Youth Ministry! Time to Talk about Anime.

Japanese animation has become a media mainstay among Gen Z. You may not “get” it, but the zoomers at your church sure do.

Review

‘One Battle After Another’ Is No Way to Live

Starring Leonardo DiCaprio, the new film from Paul Thomas Anderson plays out the dangers of extremism.

Review

Tyler Perry Takes on ‘Ruth and Boaz’

In his new Netflix movie, Ruth is a singer, Boaz has an MBA, and the Tennessee wine flows freely.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube