Ideas

EDITORIALS: Post-Simpson America

Reactions to the verdict have exposed a trust deficit that threatens our way of life.

The verdict in the O. J. Simpson case has fascinated Americans like very few things in recent memory. The “Fortune 500” industry that was the analysis of the trial has given way to another industry scrutinizing the verdict. For Christians, something transcends the question of one man’s guilt or innocence, as important as that is.

The reaction to the trial and the verdict make it clear that trust is missing in 1990s America. Without such trust, the rule of law, which is the heart of the American experiment in self-government, is not possible.

Trust, as defined by Francis Fukuyama, is the expectation that members of a group will put the good of the group ahead of selfish, narrow parochial interests, especially interests based on race or ethnicity. Without trust, there is no rational or moral basis to allow anything but force to resolve disputes.

LIVING PARALLEL LIVES

When Marcia Clark stated on a CNN broadcast that “a majority-black jury won’t convict in a case like this; they won’t bring justice,” her comments echoed the feeling of millions of Americans.

Why don’t we trust each other? Why is there a deep split in black and white opinion about the verdict? There is more going on here than “racial solidarity.” We are a nation of people who, in Robert Putnam’s words, “bowl alone.” We’ve mastered the art of living lives that rarely intersect with those of our neighbors’. We don’t have communities anymore. We have a series of tribes living parallel lives. This is especially true in matters of race.

While Mark Fuhrman’s racism stunned many white Americans, few African-Americans were surprised. For most Americans, interaction with people outside their own group is so foreign, they might as well apply for visas. Some defend this racial divide. Whites, some argue, have valid reasons (a reference to crime statistics) to avoid contact with the black community. Others make a kind of “natural law” argument. They argue that it is natural for people of the same racial and ethnic group to want to live, and even worship, together.

There are two problems with this kind of thinking. First, parallel tribes will occasionally intersect; it is bad geometry, but true nonetheless. The proper functioning of essential American institutions-the court system, the police force, public education, and the local church-is dependent on trust, which has been weakened by injustice and alienation. Thus, when a verdict such as the one in the Simpson case is rendered, confusion and misunderstanding between the racial groups erupts.

Second, the issue is not what is natural. Rather, the focus should be on what is necessary. Self-government and the rule of law are not a natural state of affairs. They are profoundly unnatural. And securing both requires unnatural acts. It requires us to transcend our self-centeredness. It requires us to ask the question “What is best for all of us?” instead of “What is best for me and my own?” Such things are necessary if the American experiment stands a chance of surviving.

INCARNATIONAL TRUST

Restoration of trust between peoples must be a task for our churches. Government policymakers are busy promoting reforms. Most of these professional efforts will not do a thing to revive trust. The church must lead the way, because it was Christianity that created the environment of interpersonal trust that undergirded the American experiment.

As a universal church, Christianity called people to transcend the myopia imposed by race, class, and tribe and regard others as their brethren. It was the church that pointed beyond the accidents of geography and spoke of a polity based on a shared commitment to the truth. If we are to preserve the American experiment, the church must admonish Americans that trust grows out of shared moral commitments. Without these, self-government is impossible.

Finally, the church must incarnate trust. If the culture does not see trust between people who profess a common allegiance to the truth, where will they see it? The Simpson case has exposed the “trust deficit” that threatens the American way of life. The alternative to the rule of law is not freedom, or even anarchy. It is coercion. If we don’t want to speak about the American experiment in the past tense, we will have to learn to trust each other. Who better to lead the way than those entrusted with the ministry of reconciliation?

Roberto Rivera is a fellow with the Wilberforce Forum, which is a ministry of Prison Fellowship.

Copyright © 1995 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Also in this issue

The CT archives are a rich treasure of biblical wisdom and insight from our past. Some things we would say differently today, and some stances we've changed. But overall, we're amazed at how relevant so much of this content is. We trust that you'll find it a helpful resource.

Cover Story

Fifty Years with Billy, Part 2

Cover Story

A Workman That Needeth Not to Be Ashamed

News

News Briefs: November 13, 1995

Vietnam Missionary, Church Threats Continue

'Heal Our Land' Prayers in Russia Initiated

Marine Worries ID Is Satanic

Haircut Ordeal Messy for School

Ministry Fund Suit Appeal Filed

Religion Is Big News in Dallas

Tent Crusade Kicks Off Campaign

BOOKS: Worth Mentioning

CHARLES COLSON: Who Speaks for Leonard?

Empowering the Laity

Jury Awards $4.8 Million in Deprogramming Case

Academia Loses Interest in Excavations

Top Evangelicals Confer with Pope

Tentmaking Movement Puts Down Stakes

Farrakhan March Reveals "Psychological Apartheid"

A Christian Community Makes Waves, Not War

Principle or Pragmatism?

Classic & Contemporary Excerpts from November 13, 1995

ARTS: Marthaโ€™s Angels

ARTS: A Brush with Prophecy

Cult Watchers Make Amends

To Hell on a Cream Puff

Graham's Smallest Audience

CONVERSATIONS: Chinaโ€™s Cross: Jonathan Chao

BOOKS: The Post-closet Era

BOOKS: Making It Strange

BOOKS: When Boomers Become CEOs

BOOKS: Jesusโ€™ Women

Grace Under Fire

SIDEBAR: Billyโ€™s Rib

Editorial

EDITORIAL: Can the Sheep Save Their Shepherds?

LETTERS: Life is Full of Odd Things

Against the Tide

God's Affirmative Justice

Tributes to Billy Graham

View issue

Our Latest

News

Died: Jack Iker, Anglican Who Drew the Line at Womenโ€™s Ordination

The Texas bishop fought a bitter legal battle with the Episcopal Church and won.

Why Canโ€™t We Talk to Each Other Anymore?

Online interactions are draining us of energy to have hard conversations in person.

Church Disappointment Is Multilayered

Jude 3 Project founder Lisa Fields speaks about navigating frustrations with God and fellow believers.

The Robot Will Lie Down With the Gosling

In โ€œThe Wild Robot,โ€ hospitality reprograms relationships.

How Priscilla Shirer Surrenders All

The best-selling Bible teacher writes about putting God first in her life and how healthy Christian discipleship requires sacrifice

The Bulletin

Second Hand News

The Bulletin talks presidential podcasts, hurricane rumors, and the spiritual histories of Israel and Iran.

Which Church in Revelation Is Yours Like?

From the lukewarm Laodicea to the overachieving Ephesus, these seven ancient congregations struggled with relatable problems.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube