News

When Believers Kill Believers

Members of the Chin ethnic minority in Myanmar—85 percent of whom profess Christianity—are fighting each other.

Wooden drill rifles at a camp in Myanmar in 2022.

Wooden drill rifles at a camp in Myanmar in 2022.

Christianity Today November 5, 2025
SOPA Images / Contributor / Getty

Since Myanmar’s military coup in February 2021, ethnic armed groups in Chin State have fought the junta. In the past four and a half years, the Myanmar army has destroyed Chin churches, killed and displaced civilians, and wiped out entire cities.

Yet beyond resisting military rule, ethnic armed groups in Chin State have also been fighting one another to extend territorial ambitions in the rugged, hilly region.

In July, fierce fighting erupted between the veteran Chin National Army and the newer Chin National Defense Force. The violence left dozens of combatants dead and forced more than 4,000 civilians to flee across the border into the Indian state of Mizoram.

Chin pastors lament the infighting, as 85 percent of the Chin population profess to be Christians. As a part of the Christian minority in the officially Buddhist country, they have faced religious persecution for decades. Chin diaspora groups in the US often raise awareness of these injustices and call on the US government to take action against the junta.

Yet unity between the more than 50 subtribes within Chin State—many with its own language—has been long been a challenge.

“We grew up under the Bible’s teachings, but when these disputes break out, where is the Bible?” asked Khuang Lian, an ethnically Chin pastor who lives outside the state. “Chin people who are concerned about God’s Word are pained by what’s happening. We cry and we feel discouraged.”

The July clashes were the latest in a series of skirmishes between the rival armed groups in the last two years. While Chin resistance groups have managed to weaken the military’s grip on the state, intensifying conflict between the Chin National Front and the Chin Brotherhood has emerged as another threat to peace.

The Chin National Front, formed in 1988 to fight against the junta, was the state’s main armed group until the 2021 coup. Nonetheless, many Chin people have access to firearms, as hunting is a way of life in the remote state often neglected by the central government. This allowed civilians to assemble quickly into numerous militias after the coup.

Several of these militias banded together to form the Chin Brotherhood, Chin National Front’s rival. Global think tank Crisis Group described relations between the two as “toxic,” noting the fatal clashes and highly charged online rhetoric from supporters in each camp. That the Chin Brotherhood has allied itself with the powerful Arakan Army from neighboring Rakhine State is particularly alarming for those with the Chin National Front, who worry the outside interference could endanger Chin autonomy.

Some Christian leaders have urged both sides to engage in peaceful dialogue, to little avail.

Salai Za Uk Ling, executive director of the Chin Human Rights Organization (CHRO), said it is disappointing to see how each faction has allowed selfish goals to take over the initial struggle for collective survival.

“Those in power have gone back to the old, oppressive ways of turf wars that are not necessarily in the best interests of the people who are suffering,” he said.

Even before the coup, nearly 6 in 10 people in the state lived below the poverty line, while 1 in 10 children were projected to die before they turned five, according to UNICEF. Today, almost 40 percent of the state’s 500,000 residents have been displaced, owing largely to the junta’s attacks and infighting, according to the nonprofit Institute of Chin Affairs.

Faith has little bearing on those leading the divided resistance, Salai Za Uk Ling added.

The warring sides are “behaving like nonbelievers,” said a pastor in Myanmar’s Sagaing Region adjacent to Chin State. He asked to remain anonymous out of fear of imprisonment given the junta’s hostile stance toward Christianity.

“Christians should be fighting for the truth, not fighting one another,” said the pastor.

His Chin counterparts have been struggling to counsel congregants who are involved in the fighting. “With tensions so high, Christian leaders have found it difficult, and some may even be afraid to approach the armed groups under such lawless circumstances,” he said. “Besides praying for God to intervene, there is little they can do.”

The first Christian missionaries to the Chin people, American Baptists Arthur and Laura Carson, arrived in the capital of the state, Hakha, in the late 1800s. Over the next century, a large majority of the Chin abandoned their traditional animistic beliefs and professed faith in Christ.

Khuang Lian, the Chin pastor, wants his people to return to their faith.

“Although my family does not stay in Chin State, I am still very concerned about the political situation because these are my people,” Khuang Lian said. “This is my homeland. I don’t want to see them attacking each other. I want to see peace and reconciliation. I want to see them go back to the Bible.”

Some pastors have even taken sides in the conflict, putting their tribal interests above God, Khuang Lian and Salai Za Uk Ling pointed out.

“They are supposed to be shepherding their flock according to God’s Word, but instead they are teaching erroneously under the cloak of Christianity,” said Salai Za Uk Ling.

The military junta plans to hold elections starting December 28, which outside observers widely view as a way to legitimize the military’s power. The junta has disbanded dozens of opposition parties, and voting will not take place in many areas due to the ongoing fighting. Meanwhile, the military has regained several strategic towns near the Chinese border after the Ta’ang National Liberation Army signed a cease-fire deal brokered by China.

As Myanmar’s civil war drags on, Salai Mang Hre Lian, head of CHRO’s human rights documentation team, urged fellow believers to “let go of our egos and self-interests.”

“We are all under the same God and in one blood. We should be living in fear and reverence of him, not of one another,” he said.

Culture
Review

‘Lewis & Tolkien’ Pours Pints at Museum of the Bible

The original play is a paean to male friendship, uninterrupted conversation, and, of course, the pub.

A photo of MWO Management’s Lewis & Tolkien.

MWO Management’s Lewis & Tolkien.

Christianity Today November 5, 2025
Image courtesy of MWO Management’s Lewis & Tolkien

A 90-minute play about two men talking through their feelings might not sound particularly gripping—thought-provoking, maybe, but not edge-of-your-seat entertaining. Yet Lewis & Tolkien, showing at the Museum of the Bible in Washington, DC, through the end of November, is exactly that.

Watching the show is like following a close boxing match, as those old Oxford dons C. S. Lewis (Bo Foxworth) and J. R. R. Tolkien (Arye Gross) go toe to toe. The fictional confrontation—set during a relational rift near the end of their lives—is convincing. The two modern titans of Christian thought might have sparred this way, referencing their past debates and slipping in jests about each other’s work.

They dance from anger to affection, from intellectual theorizing to unburdening their souls, from waxing poetic about fantasy novels to reminiscing on nights spent sitting close enough to the fire to bite the coals in their regular haunt, The Eagle and Child pub. The whole time, they’re gulping pint after pint of imaginary beer (it’s water, really) until, regrettably, Lewis concludes it is time to accept the “lament that comes from seeing the bottom of my upturned mug.”

The conversation is accessible to any theatergoer thanks to pub waitress Veronica (Anna DiGiovanni), a charming audience stand-in. But longtime fans of these writers in particular will find plenty of inside jokes to love. The story is rich, the acting is impressive, and the pacing keeps viewers captivated throughout.

The play also leaves audiences asking earnest questions about their own friendships.

“It’s so much about male friendship,” writer Dean Batali told Christianity Today in an interview shortly before the show’s opening last week. “And I didn’t even know that’s what I was writing at the time.”

That theme feels especially relevant now. Two men reconciling over an unhurried, in-person conversation, nestled in a snug pub, defies everything about modern society’s bitter ideological divisions and disembodied digital distractions. Not a single iPhone in sight. No email notifications. No Slack messages interrupting the conversation. Prolonged eye contact, full attention, and a radical willingness to stay in the same room even when wounded by the other.

Batali said viewers often draw a comparison to their own lives in this fractured age. Sure enough, at the end of the show on opening night, I overheard a man in the audience tell Batali that the conversation had him thinking about Thanksgiving. Which political affiliations or ideas might get someone uninvited from breaking bread (or carving turkey) together?

“The world is infiltrating the church,” that man bemoaned.

Lewis & Tolkien is an ambitious project, with no intermission and a torrent of multisyllabic words for the actors to memorize. It was also a daunting script for Batali to shepherd, given Lewis’s and Tolkien’s fierce admirers. He drew from the men’s books and letters, but he said he’s still a bit nervous about being corrected about some small detail or another, two years after first writing the script.

The Museum of the Bible has often hosted productions like this one in its World Stage Theater, including a recent Narnia play, which was produced by a different, overtly Christian company. Lewis & Tolkien is a more eclectic undertaking. Batali is a Christian—he told CT he had a sudden, undeniable conversion experience as a teenager and has followed Christ ever since—but the actors didn’t need to pass any theological litmus tests to get the gig, and the show wasn’t intended as an apologetic.

“Was it my purpose to tell the story of C. S. Lewis’s conversion so the people in the theater would hear a conversion story? No,” Batali said. “It came out of the story. And it’s a natural part of the story. Was it my purpose to show two friends reconciling as we’re supposed to, as demonstrated by Jesus? No. That came out of the story too. I’m very excited that it did.”

The show’s director, Andrew Borba, emphasized that anyone should feel welcome to see the play. Borba himself isn’t sure about faith, describing himself as a “seeker” after becoming disillusioned with the Catholic church.

“I apologize to anyone this offends, but there are things not in the practice of Catholicism but the structure of Catholicism that, just, I had to leave,” said Borba, a seasoned actor and director who grew up going to school with Batali in their hometown of Tacoma, Washington. “I found that it was not at all, in my opinion—my very, very faulted and humble opinion—a real practice of Christianity.”

It isn’t lost on Borba and Batali that they are old friends working together on a play about another pair of old friends who likewise shared a relationship centered around ideas and art, one of whom eventually helped push the other into embracing Christ.

“What’s going on with Lewis and Tolkien is not dissimilar to a lot of aspects of our friendship,” Borba told CT. Like Lewis and Tolkien, he reflected, he and Batali have had “many, many times where we would get together for lunch or coffee and talk religion or politics or life, and would, in the very best way, full of love and respect, engage each other.”

If there’s one overarching message to Lewis & Tolkien, it’s that: a celebration of fellowship, even when the way is narrow and the road is hard. But Batali and Borba hope this play will work for both a broader DC audience and visitors to the Museum of the Bible as a story told for the sake of simply telling a good story.

“I work a lot with new plays,” Borba confided, “and maybe the biggest challenge is that they—almost all of them—come with a strong point of view about life and then pretend to create a discussion or an argument [or] a dramatic event around it. But so clearly the playwright is like, ‘This is right thinking. Here’s my agenda.’”

“Good theater doesn’t do that,” he said. “Good storytelling doesn’t do that. It breathes and opens into the things that matter.”

Borba is convinced Batali’s work does just that. Still, the show’s location at the Museum of the Bible may keep DC’s more liberal theater fans at bay, many of them wary of setting foot in a building associated with conservative Christianity.

But they needn’t worry. The play “doesn’t preach,” Batali said. “It’s just characters expressing what they believe, which might challenge you a little bit, but that’s not the intent.”

“And also, by the way,” he added, “You can get in and out of here without seeing a Bible.”

Batali is used to occupying this in-between space after spending more than 30 years in Hollywood as both a Christian and a writer. He wrote for That ’70s Show and Buffy the Vampire Slayer, among other productions.

He recalled once pitching a story line where Buffy teams up with the local Christian youth group. It didn’t make the cut, although he did manage to write a conversation about God into That ’70s Show.

“They happened to be high at the time,” he noted. “But.”

Batali told CT he often faces pushback from Christians who are suspicious of the art world.

“Christians need to open their minds to what stories do,” he said. “‘In the world, not of it,’ … but we still have to engage culture.” After 35 years making that argument, Batali still feels that the church is “playing catch-up,” which is why it’s “so satisfying to be here in a theater with 490 seats, with a professional director and actors with years of experience.”

The play does come across as professional. The primary danger in seeing it, more so than being around uncomfortable ideas, is the extreme longing afterward to find a similar pub nearby where one’s own friends can gather for hours by a cozy fire.

Even if I find a suitable venue, cell phones will still exist. And my friends and I haven’t spent nearly enough time translating Beowulf to enjoy the same caliber of conversation.

I’ll have to cherish the memory of this play, in the meantime, and the genuine affection it displayed for two writers I adore.

“You kind of lean forward, listening to them,” Batali said of the dialogue. “They enjoy language.”

Language, yes. And for Tolkien and Lewis, quite a few pints too.

Haley Byrd Wilt is a writer based in Washington, DC.

News

ChatGPT Announces New Erotica Feature

How ChatGPT’s new turn offers opportunities for the gospel.

A man looking into virtual reality goggles.

A man looking into virtual reality goggles.

Christianity Today November 5, 2025
Kegfire / Envato / Edits by CT

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, recently announced that ChatGPT will roll out a new erotica feature in December, part of an adaptation that will loosen restrictions and “treat adult users like adults.”

The Bulletin sat down with Russell Moore, Mike Cosper, and Brandon Rickabaugh, public philosopher and founder and CEO of the Novus Initiative, to discuss AI chatbot companions, the illusion of online intimacy, and the call of Jesus in a world of rapidly changing technology. The entire interview can be heard in episode 221. Here are edited excerpts.

What are AI companions, and how are they used?

Brandon Rickabaugh: AI companions constitute a host of potential relationships. These bots could purchase things for you on Amazon or do work for you. Mental health bots have been around for a long time, predating ChatGPT. You also have companion bots that are trained to behave like a close friend, romantic partner, or spouse. Now you’ve got companion bots that can serve the purpose of erotica too.

Most of the research about these companions piggybacks off the psychology and sociology of pornography use. Psychology models also predict the kinds of behaviors people have with these chatbots. When people use these, they anthropomorphize; they attribute humanlike properties like mind, consciousness, and agency to these bots.

Elon Musk’s SuperGrok subscribers can pay $30 a month to access AI companions that offer erotic content. Is it accurate to compare this to drug dealing, selling something we know is going to make you an emotional addict and is dangerous for your health?

Russell Moore: Yes. A recent report in Harper’s Magazine spoke of “freebasing” pornography (like heating and smoking a drug so the high is particularly intense). AI companions possess all of the problems of digital pornography plus an illusion of emotional connection. God’s design is sexuality in the context of relationship, and relationship in the context of covenant, and covenant in the context of God. Now you have the illusion of relationship and sexuality without covenant, without genuine reality at all. 

I talk with pastors dealing with men who say, “I’ve fallen in love with a chatbot. She understands me better than my wife does.” This algorithmic technology is specifically designed to reflect back to that person what he expects from a partner and a relationship. When you add sexual content to that longing for connection, that is a really dangerous combination. We haven’t even figured out how to deal with the old-school porn problem in our churches, much less this.

Rickabaugh: When we say that they “understand,” that is anthropomorphizing. The truth is that chatbots have no understanding. There’s no sentience behind them at all. I encourage computer scientists to use non-anthropomorphic language in their models and also their interface, but it sneaks in. We cannot talk about chatbots knowing or feeling things because there is no sentience in them. 

That’s helpful, Brandon, because what Russell’s describing is this person’s perception of connection. It seems very deceitful that someone perceives an understanding when it’s not really there. 

Mike Cosper: The language I have found helpful here is “frictionless relationships.” A normal relationship between a man and a woman has some friction, conflict, difficulties connecting and communicating. We have to get through that friction to preserve intimacy or repair relationships when they’ve been harmed. 

With these AI chatbots, that friction’s removed. The algorithm always adapts to keep the human being in the relationship happy. The goal is to get your attention and keep you logged in. The danger is greater for young people, but also for the elderly and lonely. These things are profoundly seductive.

I do not believe these companies care about age verification. My state, Kentucky, has tried to require age verification for porn sites; but there are easy ways to get around those safeguards. Companies will diligently stay ahead of that to protect young people from getting addicted to this stuff? That’s a giant joke.

We often hear the church needs to step up and provide community for lonely people. While certainly that’s a part of what is needed here, does the church have larger work when it comes to companionship AI? 

Moore: The church needs to recognize this in a way that doesn’t treat it as freakish, science-fiction-y, and weird. Otherwise, people don’t want to talk about it. Also, it’s awkward to talk about sexual and relational temptation in anything but abstract terms. A pastor who stands up and talks about erotic chatbots will have people coming up after and saying, “Why did you bring that up? That’s risque.”

The New Testament does not have that kind of reticence about dealing with temple prostitution and other issues in the first-century world. We need to acknowledge how vulnerable we all are. Technology has shaped all of us in some ways we can see and others we can’t. We should not laugh at this and treat it as futuristic or outlandish. This is real. This is here right now.

Rickabaugh: Jesus talks about technology. The Sermon on the Mount has a fundamental debate about mechanization versus non-mechanization of persons. Technology can operate beneath the surface, at the level of the will, heart, emotions, and thoughts, where we treat ourselves and others as non-people. In contrast, the Sermon on the Mount makes clear that personhood matters. We are children included in God’s kingdom. Jesus talks about this all over the place. You can understand that as a kind of discussion about technology, if you get clear on what counts as a technology.

Moore: The Bible speaks directly to issues of technology and spiritual formation, some in ways that might not have even been understandable until now. Isaiah and Jeremiah talk about the man who constructs an idol, creates its mouth, creates its ears, and then expects it to speak to him and to hear him. He experiences disillusionment and disappointment because it’s not there to respond to him when he cries to it. That’s exactly what I’m seeing right now, even apart from the sexual content. People say, “I’ve really been trusting my chatbot to tell me what to do. Now I’m starting to feel like it’s just giving back to me what I’m expecting.” That prompts some people to ask, “What am I doing? What’s happening? What’s actually real?”

Rickabaugh: Disillusionment is the perfect description. If you look at the AI community, at Silicon Valley and the beginning of the AI movement, you’ll see people radically enchanted but disillusioned with themselves. 

Cosper: Most artificial intelligence is not designed with an ethical superstructure, but within a very humanistic framework of logic, ethics, and human relationships. If that’s the case, there’s no metaphysics that values humanity and offers some way of processing ethical issues. The conversation will constantly move into places that are very dark and full of evil.

Steven Adler, an AI researcher who led product safety at OpenAI, recently wrote an op-ed for The New York Times on this topic. He said, “To control highly capable A.I. systems of the future, companies may need to slow down long enough for the world to invent new safety methods—ones that even nefarious groups can’t bypass.” Talk to me about the value of slowness in the midst of this rapidly developing technology.

Moore: We can pump the brakes in terms of cultivating slowness in our own lives, but there is no mechanism to slow down technological development when you have large, multinational companies. We haven’t even figured out policy or cultural standards for how to deal with the old social media companies and search engine companies, much less what’s happening right now. 

When I talk to people in Silicon Valley who are working on this technology, often they will say, “If we’re not doing it, China’s doing it” or “If China’s not doing it, India’s doing it,” or someone else. The language is really similar to nuclear weapons technology: “This isn’t great, but we have to be on top of it.” That makes it difficult for any individual or even for any state or nation to get a handle on this. Because of this, churches and Christians need to say, “How can I cultivate slowness and spiritual formation even in the midst of all of that that I cannot control?”

Rickabaugh: We can slow down and ask, “Can we buy a license at ChatGPT now?” You can make a strong case that Christians need to say no. There are many different applications of AI we can say no to—to the mental health use, to music selection in an app. I can’t do anything about large-scale AI, but I can say no to all sorts of things that are within the effective range of my will. 

As we do this, we take seriously what Jesus says about humanity and realize that the Spirit is just as powerful as the Spirit’s always been. These technologies do not push on any new button in terms of human nature. The answer to human flourishing is becoming more and more like Jesus in terms of our whole person. That’s going to require pulling away from a lot of things, including various kinds of technology. 

I am very hopeful about what the church can do if the church switches its understanding of spiritual formation. Within the past decade, people have turned spiritual formation into a kind of technology. When people talk about the spiritual disciplines being the thing that transforms you, I want to say, “Hold on, hold on. It is the Spirit that transforms us.” You can do the disciplines all day and become an angrier person. 

If you turn spiritual disciplines into the sort of thing that you can do a particular amount of time on a particular kind of schedule in a particular kind of way, that’s turning it into a technology. That’s very dangerous. Apps are coming out that are intended to take the role of pastors. You’re going to have spiritual guides that track all of your health data.

So what does it look like to follow Jesus in the church? I think it requires us to be very mindful about what these technologies are and what they do, what we can say no to, what it would take to be the kinds of people that say no to that. The history of technology and the history of the church have got this profound relationship that has affected spiritual formation. I’m actually very hopeful about being able to do a lot of great good when people are radically disillusioned, like Russell said. The church has the capacity to show people what people are.

‘Can We Just Ignore It? Nope.’

Responses to our July/August article about AI and other stories.

Photo of CT's July August issue
Source image: Envato

This year at CT, we’ve been focusing (understandably so!) on questions around artificial intelligence, particularly generative AI tools—models like Grok and Claude that use prompts to create original text or images. In addition to many of the stories in our July/August issue, our online coverage has recently taken on what ChatGPT means for Christian education, the efficacy of AI prayers, and whether churches should use AI tools to answer seekers’ questions.

But AI also underlies many of the technologies we’ve come to think of as more mundane, including dating apps. “I had similar experiences with apps to what is described and ended up finding my current spouse through offline means from a personal connection,” wrote Wes Hurd of Washington, DC, in response to reporter Harvest Prude’s story on algorithmic matchmaking, “What Algorithms Have Brought Together.”

So how can the church actually help young people connect with each other? Speed dating programs? Swing dancing and pickleball? “I think the cure for this is not necessarily new programs or paradigms,” Hurd added, “but a restoration of soul care, pastoral care, and relationality between pastors and the people who come to their churches.”

We’ll keep covering these interplays at the heart of AI discourse—between the digital and the embodied, new interventions and steadfast tradition—in the months ahead.

Kate Lucky, senior editor, features

What Is (Artificial) Intelligence?

Kudos to Christianity Today for raising thoughtful questions, including the vital starting point “What is intelligence?” How can we navigate AI if we can’t first define human intelligence? That said, I was surprised the roundtable didn’t include experts in human intelligence. Behavioral scientists have grappled with this. While definitions vary, psychology offers well-established frameworks—like Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligences, Robert Sternberg’s wisdom-based models, and John Flavell’s work on metacognition—that speak directly to these questions. The lack of consensus in psychology reveals the profound complexity of the issue. Ignoring these insights risks reinventing the wheel without a clear foundation, perpetuating guesswork even while raising thoughtful questions. This may be one of Silicon Valley’s core missteps: developing AI without grounding in theological, philosophical, or psychological understandings of what it means to be human. Yes, biology and psychology have at times been at odds with an imago Dei framework—but even through secular insights, God’s truth can shine.


Stephanie Wilsey, Beaver Falls, PA

A possible Christian definition of intelligence is the ability to make righteous choices before God. This, we believe, is where our greatest utility, happiness, or well-being lies. If we stick to the definition above, it is hard to imagine how AI systems will ever be able to optimize their own well-being in the way just described. To ascribe this sort of intelligence to AI would be nonsensical. The increase in human well-being that AI can bring will always be limited and instrumental. AI can make our lives more comfortable, and that is of course a very commendable end. It may even be pleasing to God. But even so, artificial intelligence will always be only an instrument in effecting the choices we have to intelligently make ourselves. And AI can certainly not bring us to where our ultimate happiness or utility lies: in the full realization of the kingdom of God. That is something that not even human intelligence and the rational choices it implies can bring about.


Johan Serré, Berlaar, Belgium

When We Make Intelligence In our Image

AI in its current infancy is already capable of great feats of intelligence. I am surprised that Timothy Dalrymple rejects the ability of AI to create intelligent beings. Even if he is ultimately correct and AI creates something less threatening, I can easily imagine AI (and its human guides) creating a humanoid with fake skin, blood, and bones but with supercognitive ability. It might not be a genuine being, but we’d be easily fooled by a fake. If we find it impossible to recognize an altered photograph right now, the former scenario is not far off. The challenge is much greater than simply refusing to anthropomorphize AI.


Andrew Cornell, Dresden, Ontario

I am an AI researcher, a Christian, a signer of the Southern Baptist statement on AI, and currently writing a book on computer and AI ethics. I have been warning people about “science-fiction AI” for decades. I regularly have the weird experience of being squelched in conversations because I actually know how chatbots work and people don’t like me spoiling their fantasies. If we ever do make a conscious machine (which I do not see any way of doing), we will not have created consciousness, only transplanted ours into something else.


Michael A. Covington

Unlearning the Gospel of Efficiency

As a scientist working for a biotech company, I have witnessed AI take a prominent seat in our corporate goals since a couple of years ago. The aim is to boost efficiency as we have slowed hiring due to economic headwinds. That’s why I found Kelly M. Kapic’s reflection so refreshing. It’s a vital reminder that our human flourishing is not dependent on productivity, but rather on a relationship with a loving and faithful God.


Jane Hui, Vancouver, British Columbia

God Remembers in Our Dementia

I see this daily in my work with hospice. Much grief would be mended by acknowledging what’s changed and loving what remains.

@therobbyortiz (Instagram)

We have been walking this journey with our mom for the past seven years. There are and have been many tears of anger (at the disease and God) and sadness as we watch her continue to suffer and decline. This has challenged my faith like no other.

@kdebeer63 (Instagram)

Culture

Carving Out Faith

A photo essay highlights thousands of pilgrims observing Christmas in the quiet highland town of Lalibela.

Pilgrims make their way in and out of Biete Medhane Alem (House of the Saviour of the World), the largest of the monolithic churches in Lalibela.

Photo by Andrew Faulk

Each January, as Christmas is observed on the Ethiopian Orthodox calendar, the population of the quiet highland town of Lalibela swells with thousands of pilgrims. They arrive from farming villages, market towns, bustling cities, and distant provinces—some walking for days or weeks along dusty roads and others arriving by bus before climbing the last steep miles on foot. All come for Genna, the celebration of Christ’s birth, and to worship at one of Ethiopia’s most revered holy sites.

Lalibela’s medieval churches, carved directly from volcanic rock in the 12th and 13th centuries under King Lalibela, were created as a “new Jerusalem” for those unable to travel to the Holy Land. Each is hewn as a monolith, and they are connected by narrow passageways, trenches, and dimly lit tunnels. The most iconic, Biete Ghiorgis, takes the form of a cross cut deep into the earth—its walls descending into shadow while its roof levels with the surrounding ground.

In the cool mountain air, pilgrims wrapped in white cotton shammas press into the complex’s winding entrances. They bow to kiss stone thresholds, kneel on uneven floors worn smooth by centuries of devotion, and gather in candlelit chambers where chants echo off carved walls. The rituals are both communal and personal—moments of reverence link them to prior generations.

For many, the pilgrimage is a rare journey away from the demands of life, a chance to gather with family, friends, and strangers in shared worship. Here, the Christmas story is not only told and preached from the mountainsides but also felt—in stone, in song, and in the footsteps of faith.

Photo by Andrew Faulkk
The distinct cruciform structure of Biete Ghiorgis is one of 11 churches around Lalibela that are part of the UNESCO World Heritage Site.

News

US Missionary Pilot Kidnapped in Niger

Local Nigerien missionaries are shocked and saddened; foreign workers there provide training, aid, and encouragement.

Kevin Rideout makes preflight checks before transporting a team from Hope Springs International in Niger.

Kevin Rideout makes preflight checks before transporting a team from Hope Springs International in Niger.

Christianity Today November 4, 2025
Image courtesy of Lee Hodges / Hope Springs International

On the night of October 21, three unidentified men kidnapped 48-year-old American missionary pilot Kevin Rideout from his home in a secure neighborhood blocks away from the presidential palace in Niamey, the capital city of Niger. The armed kidnappers then headed toward the western Tillaberi region in Niger, where militants linked to Islamic State (ISIS) and al-Qaeda are active, according to Reuters.

When Moussa Djibo, a Nigerien missionary with Calvary Ministries (CAPRO) in Niamey, heard the news, he was worried. “We … always thought Niamey was safe because it is the capital,” he said. “But after the kidnapping, we realized we are not safe. They can kidnap us too.”

The US embassy in Niamey issued a security alert on October 22 warning American citizens of a heightened risk of kidnapping in the country. “We are seeing efforts from across the US government to support the recovery and safe return of this US citizen,” a State Department spokesperson told CBS News. This is the first kidnapping of an American in Niger since 2020.

Rideout, a pilot for the mission organization Serving in Mission (SIM), has lived in Niger with his family for nearly two decades. He often flew between Niamey and SIM’s hospital in the village of Galmi until flights were paused last year due to insecurity, a colleague of Rideout in Niamey told The Washington Post. A 2014 article on the Rideout family noted that he and his wife, Krista, also worked in drilling wells to provide clean water, helping refugees, teaching literacy, and helping widows start microfinancing enterprises.

Local Nigerien pastors and missionaries noted the importance of foreign missionaries to provide financial support and encouragement in a country where Christians make up less than 2 percent of the population. More than 98 percent of the population is Muslim.

“We work hand in hand with the foreign missionaries,” Djibo said. “When they are not here, there is no one to teach or guide us. They know we are one in the work of the Lord. We are always together.”

Analysts believe that Islamic State Sahel Province or criminals connected to that group kidnapped Rideout. In recent years, the group and its militant rivals have grown in strength in parts of Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso due to a security vacuum caused by junta leaders kicking out Western military assistance and closing the UN peacekeeping mission in Mali in 2023.

In July 2023, Niger’s general Abdourahamane Tiani ousted President Mohamed Bazoum in a military coup. Tiani vowed to restore security and ordered foreign troops, including the US military, to vacate the landlocked country. But Human Rights Watch reported that Islamist insurgents in Niger have killed at least 130 people in attacks between March and September this year.

Kidnapping of foreign workers in Niger has intensified in the past two years. Jihadists abducted at least 15 foreign nationals between July 2024 and April 2025. The number of terrorism-related deaths increased by 94 percent in 2024, according to the Institute of Economics and Peace, making the French-speaking county the 5th most affected globally, up from 10th in 2023.

The attacks also target the minority Christian population. Open Doors’ 2025 World Watch List ranked Niger as the 28th most dangerous country for Christians. Muslim mobs have set dozens of churches ablaze and attacked Christian communities.

Back in October 2016, Islamic extremists linked to al-Qaeda kidnapped Jeff Woodke, an American missionary with YWAM, from his home in Abalak, Niger. With the help of authorities in Niger, his captors released him more than six years later.

“They broke my hope,” Woodke later told ABC News. “They hated me for being an American, for being a suspected security agent, for being a Christian, doing missions work, all those things.”

Nigerien missionary Dan Karami Hassane said Rideout’s kidnapping should “raise an alarm for every Christian to pray,” as he worries about the missionary’s well-being.

Hassane grew up attending mosque in his hometown of Maradi before a friend gave him a Bible to read as a teen. He felt drawn to the love of the God of the Bible in contrast to the Quran’s teaching of Allah and became a Christian. Now a church planter, he disciples Christians in villages across Niger.

Though shocked by Rideout’s kidnapping, Hassane hopes it won’t deter foreign missionary efforts in Niger, which bring much needed training, finances, and spiritual support to local Nigerien missionaries and pastors. Often the locals are the ones preaching and teaching.

Olu Sunday, president and CEO of Royal Missionary Outreach International in Nigeria and Niger, noted that after the coup, the military government viewed foreign missionaries as spies and barred them from entering villages and remote areas. All the foreign missionaries who used to work with Sunday’s organization have now left. Local missionaries are struggling to fill the void.

“When we were together, they were seriously involved with the Christian converts and projects,” Sunday said. “But now we are [the] foster fathers to all they left behind. We must continue to sustain those local leaders and continue to give them hope.”

Djibo noted that in the mission school he attended, teachers let students know that dying in the mission field was a very real probability. “Even if they ask us to go preach to [the Islamic jihadists], we will find someone to go,” Djibo said. “We have signed that if we are to die, we will die. We don’t have such fear.”

He added that their only fear is about how their deaths and suffering could impact their families.

“Humanly speaking, we have no courage,” Djibo said. “But it is the Lord that has put this courage in us. He is the one protecting us.”

Books
Excerpt

The ‘Whole Counsel of God’ Requires Seeking Justice—and Naming Sin

An excerpt from Don’t Let Nobody Turn You Around on family history, gospel music, and the great Christian legacy of the Civil Rights Movement.

The book cover on a yellow background.
Christianity Today November 4, 2025
Illustration by Christianity Today / Source Images: Getty, IVP

My maternal grandmother, Willie Faye, was born in Forest, Mississippi, in 1932. That’s the same year segregationist Martin “Sure Mike” Conner was inaugurated as governor of Mississippi. 

From Reconstruction to the 1950s, Mississippi had more lynchings than any other state in the Union. Accordingly, Willie Faye’s parents kept a shotgun by the door to protect the family in case the Ku Klux Klan decided to pay them a visit and tried not to leave the house after sundown. Fearing the false allegations of looking at a White woman inappropriately, her first cousins, Billie and Buford, fled the state as teenagers. 

Yet Conner, a Yale-educated lawyer, practically ignored this violence while endlessly railing against the federal government and President Roosevelt’s New Deal for “meddling in the race question” and treading on states’ rights. 

Named after her father, Willie Frazier, Willie Faye—or Faye for short—was the sixth of eight children. By natural disposition, she became the glue binding a house full of conflicting personalities together. She found herself playing the role of mediator, defusing in-house rivalries and settling disputes. The siblings would have to pick cotton to help make ends meet, and they often went shoeless as they labored in the heat of the Mississippi Delta for depressed wages that weren’t magically corrected by the invisible hand of the market. Early on, she vowed that her future children would never pick cotton or go shoeless. 

Unlike Governor Conner, Faye would not attend an Ivy League school or any college at all. She’d leave high school at the age of 16 to get married. According to her mother, this was the best option given the social location of a Black woman of her day, and by this time, her family had uprooted and moved to Decatur, Illinois, in search of greater social justice and economic opportunities. 

Before leaving school, Faye sang in the Colored Girls’ Choir at Stephen Decatur High School. She also sang in the choir of her Black Pentecostal church and developed a passion for the formation and Christian education of children. Faye loved gospel music. Every Saturday morning when she cleaned the house, there was one voice her three children were sure to hear: Mahalia Jackson. 

Known as the Queen of Gospel Music, Jackson was her favorite artist—a muse Willie Faye would cherish in mundane, celebratory, and disheartening moments for decades. Her voice would pierce through denominational walls and inspire singers like Aretha Franklin. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would say, “A voice like [Mahalia’s] comes along once in a millennium.” It’s been described as not a voice but a force of nature. 

Mahalia, or “Halie” for short, was born in New Orleans in 1911. She grew up in the Black Pearl section of the city in a three-room house with 13 family members, including aunts and cousins. Her mother, Charity, died when she was five years old, leaving her with her Aunt Duke, a stern disciplinarian.

Three of Mahalia’s nicknames from childhood provide insight into her early social experience: “Hook” referred to her severely bowed legs and crossed feet, “Black” referred to her dark complexion, and “Warpee” was the name of a Native American character who walked around barefoot, as Mahalia often did because she couldn’t afford shoes. 

While the nicknames were often repeated affectionately, they exposed real pain points in her life. Born with deformities, with dark skin in a colorist society, and in poverty, Mahalia was about as far from privilege as one could get. Her ascribed status didn’t provide her with any advantages, but her faith, her diligence, and her voice would distinguish her in due time. 

Mahalia left school before finishing fourth grade to work and tend to family. However, her experience overcoming her disadvantages in a harsh urban environment developed a “mother wit” that’d eventually make her a wise counselor and formidable businesswoman. And throughout a very rough childhood, Mahalia always had the church. 

Her maternal grandfather, Paul Clark, was a Baptist preacher, and from a young age, she was known as a prayer warrior who almost never missed a church service. She sang her first hymn at four and was capturing the audience at Mount Moriah Baptist Church by 14.

Willie Faye and Mahalia shared a common American experience viewed through the lens of faith. Both Black women were born deep in the Jim Crow South and reared in the traditional Black church. The stench of slavery still lingered in the air of their environment and was visible in the scars of the family members who shaped their worldview. Both were nurtured by elders who were formerly enslaved themselves. They were cautioned by the wisdom of the enslaved and emboldened by the courage of those who’d survived America’s original sin. 

These women lived in an era that some have called America’s Second Slavery. Even after Emancipation, Black labor was still being stolen through the sharecropping system, and racial injustice was upheld in courts of partiality. Additionally, white supremacist defenders of the Lost Cause believed it their calling to literally terrorize the Black community to maintain political and economic dominance. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, almost two or three Blacks were lynched every week in America. 

As Willie Faye and Mahalia were coming into womanhood, the “progressive” eugenics movement was giving “false scientific legitimacy” to forced sterilization. As a result, tens of thousands of Black women were victimized by non-consensual sterilization, including Civil Rights leader Fannie Lou Hamer, who called it a “Mississippi Appendectomy.” They both journeyed to escape Jim Crow’s jurisdiction but would still endure racism with a different accent and Midwestern flavor.

Willie Faye and Mahalia’s story is the story of the Black church’s Civil Rights generation, a generation whose Christian faith and social action prowess provided us with perhaps the greatest illustration of moral imagination in America’s history. For the purposes of this book, Willie Faye and Mahalia’s generation are those who served as the base of the Civil Rights movement—the progeny of the enslaved and the fruit of the Black church. 

They were Black Americans for whom the Christian church served as the center of spiritual, social, and political life. They talked about morality and heaven, but unlike the white evangelical church, they didn’t limit God’s will in the public square to personal piety. They recognized social justice as a required part of the kingdom plan. 

Unlike secularists, they clearly didn’t interpret the separation between church and state to be a severing of one’s faith from their sociopolitical engagement. Faith guided and anchored their social action. 

Unlike the social gospel of today’s progressive Christians, they believed the “whole counsel of God” was more than the justice imperative alone (Acts 20:27, RSV). It also involved the Bible’s tenets about sin and how sin exists in all of humanity, not excluding their community or themselves. 

Lastly, unlike much of Black secular activism, while it understood that “power concedes nothing without a demand,” they believed their social actions had to be aspirational, holy, and redemptive and that no group of people, not even their oppressors, was irredeemable. Willie Faye and Mahalia’s generation were not the originators of the Black church’s social action tradition, but they were perhaps its crown. They grasped the legacy and the lessons they learned from their elders and took “bigger steps and bigger risks.”

While Mahalia grew up in a Baptist church, when she moved to Chicago it became clear that she’d been heavily influenced by the sound of the Black Pentecostal church a few doors from her home in New Orleans. Many of the Baptist churches in Chicago didn’t appreciate the impassioned shouting and improvisation in her style. Gospel singer Sallie Martin said that early on “most of the big churches still didn’t receive her work. … Some were very, very much against her—and other singers looked down their noses at her.” 

Denominationalism and classism were at play here. Many Baptists considered their music refined, unlike the frenzied shouting of lower-class Pentecostals in what was called the sanctified church. But Mahalia would eventually compel some resistant Baptist audiences to “get happy” and applaud a more Pentecostal approach to worship.

Today, the Black Baptist church I attend welcomes shouting and impassioned praise, in large part based on Jackson’s legacy. She was the intoning voice of a generation of women who nurtured and powered churches, communities, and a social movement—women like Willie Faye who fed and supported the leaders before and after they preached and protested. But her voice didn’t just impact the women of her time; it became the pitch for the Civil Rights generation in general. 

If the Civil Rights Movement had theme music and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s visionary words were the bars that laced the track, then Mahalia’s riveting contralto blessed the chorus, melodically expressing the ethic and motif of this world-changing social composition. 

She sang her signature versions of the songs “How I Got Over” and “I Been Buked and I Been Scorned” at the March on Washington in 1963 before Dr. Martin Luther King gave his famous “I Have a Dream” speech. During the speech, in the Black church’s time-honored call-and-response tradition, she would shout, “Tell ’em about the dream, Martin. Tell ’em about the dream.”

That theme wasn’t in his notes, and he hadn’t originally intended on mentioning it that day. But Mahalia had heard Dr. King speak about “the dream” in other addresses and had experienced its power. As fate would have it, her encouragement might have catalyzed the most memorable lines of one of the greatest speeches in American history.

How often did Willie Faye and hundreds of thousands of other Black Christians in her generation find respite in Mahalia Jackson’s voice? How often did they remove their soiled aprons and weathered fedoras after enduring another day of subordination and segregation and pull one of Mahalia’s records from its sleeve? 

I imagine, almost out of necessity, they put the vinyl on the turntable, carefully placed the phonograph needle down, and through her spirituals were persuaded or even compelled to push forward another day. Or perhaps some tuned in to her weekly CBS radio program, sank into the couch, or prepared soul food supper and let her powerful articulation of the sanctified gospel heal their souls. 

Their pain was too real and direct for this to have simply been a routine or formulaic exercise. No, this was soul-penetrating praise and worship in the spirit of the prophet Jeremiah and King David. It was embattled petitioners saying, “Lord, hear my prayer, listen to my cry for mercy; in your faithfulness and righteousness come to my relief” (Ps. 143:1). 

Through the music, we see how the spiritual and the sociopolitical were seamlessly tied together in the Black church social action tradition. The spirituals they sang in church were the same spirituals they sang during marches and protests. In church, they’d sing about faithfully pursuing God: 

Ain’t gonna let nobody turn me ’roun’
Turn me ’roun’
Ain’t gonna let nobody turn me ’roun’ 
I’m gonna wait until my change comes. 

For a social action march, they might adapt the song by singing, 

Ain’t gonna let no Jim Crow turn me around 
Turn me around, turn me around
Ain’t gonna let no injunction turn me around 
I’m gonna keep on a-walkin’, keep on a-talkin’ 
Marchin’ up to freedom land. 

In the same vein, the song “Keep Your Eyes on the Prize,” one of the most recognizable Civil Rights spirituals, was an adaptation of “Keep Your Hand on the Plow,” a gospel song based on Luke 9:62. Negro spirituals were ever present in the Civil Rights Movement. It was a way for Black Christians to take the church with them as they journeyed outside the four walls of the sanctuary. By singing spirituals in the field of life, Willie Faye and Mahalia’s generation was continuing a legacy of placing God at the center of their interactions in the world. 

Black Christians in that generation greatly invested in the church and made major sacrifices for it. Some weeks, Mahalia would be exhausted after five straight nights of revival singing at Greater Salem, where all the proceeds would go to the programming for the children’s ministry, “so those children wouldn’t have to run around the streets.” Faye and her husband, Bishop Thomas L. Cooper, helped build Church of the Living God, Pillar and Ground of the Truth, Temple #1 brick by brick and paid off the last of the mortgage for Temple #2 out of their own pockets. 

The Black Church’s social action, at its best, was a negro spiritual in action. While the Black Church was far from unanimous in its support of social activism, “from the beginning, the Civil Rights Movement was anchored in the Black Church.” Preachers and the people in the pews organized and financially supported the movement. Again, Willie Faye and Mahalia’s generation of Christian advocates didn’t disconnect the sacred from their engagement in the public square. 

Some secular movements have interpreted religion and talk of faith and heaven as merely a form of escapism—a means of disengaging from reality. But for many the hymns helped them better engage reality. There were indeed those in their community who tried to dismiss the here and now by solely focusing on the hereafter. However, the Civil Rights Movement was the opposite of escapism. It was an action-oriented initiative with a keen awareness of the principalities and spiritual wickedness in high places at play in society. 

Social justice outside of the existence of a loving and just God doesn’t make sense. The worldview at the center of the Black church’s social action tradition rejected the idea that this miraculously designed world came from nothingness. A godless particle or uncreated big bang couldn’t possibly create Mahalia’s voice, Zora Neale Hurston’s prose, George Washington Carver’s scientific mind, or a slave’s moral imagination. The “black sacred cosmos or the religious worldview of African Americans” saw the whole universe was sacred.

And acknowledging the spirit world and human limitation doesn’t require a surrender to anti-intellectualism. Look no further than the brilliant Black organizers and tacticians who orchestrated the Civil Rights Movement from church fellowship halls. Leaders like Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth strategically outwitted devious Birmingham commissioners and sheriffs, proving logic was neither scorned nor in short supply in Christian advocacy circles. 

Great minds were at work, but those minds weren’t obstacles to a greater faith. Faith and logic weren’t in conflict. These believers employed both. They were at peace and even celebrated dependence on a higher power (Prov. 13:4; Col. 3:23; Heb. 13:16). Their faith was refuge from the hopelessness of the skeptics. They knew prayer and a song of worship could accomplish things a philosophical treatise could not. 

This Black church tradition can still provide a model for how Christian orthodoxy and orthopraxy can help the church and a polarized nation overcome the toxic culture wars and move toward a greater faithfulness and civic pluralism. Our historic public witness can correct many of the erroneous approaches, attitudes, and practices much of American Christianity has fallen into in the public square today. The Black church has a word for this moment in the public square. 

Justin Giboney is an ordained minister, an attorney, and the president of And Campaign, a Christian civic organization. He’s the author of the forthcoming book Don’t Let Nobody Turn You Around: How the Black Church’s Public Witness Leads Us out of the Culture War.

Adapted from Don’t Let Nobody Turn You Around by Justin Giboney. ©2025 by Justin Giboney. Used by permission of InterVarsity Press. www.ivpress.com.

Books

You Can Be a Christian and a Patriot

Daniel Darling calls believers to their political duty, no matter the chaos.

The book cover on a blue background.
Christianity Today November 4, 2025
Illustration by Christianity Today / Source Images: Getty, Broadside Books

We hardly know how to refer to political philosophies in America these days: What we once called conservatism is now considered “zombie Reaganism” or the passé postwar consensus, overtaken today by populism. Daniel Darling, best-selling author and director of the Land Center for Cultural Engagement at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary (SWBTS), is what Russell Kirk called an imaginative conservative.

Kirk described this role not so much as a policy program but rather as a posture of deep gratitude for the American tradition. Like reflective conservatives before him, Darling reminds us in his latest offering that we need the virtue of prudence to navigate politics in a fallen world where there are no utopian solutions.  

In Defense of Christian Patriotism responds to the ubiquitous question of how to relate faith to politics in a contentious but trivializing age. Darling seems keenly aware of the binary temptations believers will face and weaves a path through each with care: neither to retreat from politics nor be obsessed with it, neither to idolize our country nor condemn it.

How should we understand our Christian obligation toward our nation? Patriotism is a duty of all citizens across the world. Just as we have duties to love our families and neighborhoods, we ought to love our countries as well. To borrow from Thomas Aquinas, love is the persistent will for the good of the other—the genuine good, not the perceived one.

That means that in countries with political corruption, citizens ought to work for an honest government even when that means opposing the powers that be. A nation, after all, is not only a government but also a people and a place. Wherever there is good in a national tradition, we ought to celebrate it. When the country needs the service of its people, we ought to give it.

For Christians, the call to true patriotism can be puzzling when the culture seems to have rejected the faith and made itself an enemy of the kingdom of God. Even when our own country is spiritually failing, we must love it the way God commanded the Hebrews in exile to love their Babylonian city and work for its good (Jer. 29:7). Christians have a duty to engage in politics despite its messiness.

This is especially challenging given the ever-increasing cadre of those who consider themselves politically homeless. We might ask ourselves whether our exhaustion from the bad behavior of our parties or politicians excuses us from voting thoughtfully, running for office, and helping to shape policy. What happens if the salt of the earth loses its saltiness? Christians of influence can help to preserve what might otherwise rot.

The problem with Christian nationalism is not that it is (or claims to be) Christian but that it is nationalist. Nationalism claims superiority for one’s own people and place over all others. Patriotism understands our own love and loyalty as compatible with that of other people’s love and loyalty to their own nations, as long as it’s all in service to the genuine good.

To love my own nation is not to discount another’s any more than loving my own family means discounting other families. We can and should love other families and nations in a broad sense, even if we do not have the particular obligations to them that we have to our own.

Darling points us to the story of Jonah. Jonah loved Israel. Since Nineveh and the Assyrians were enemies who had done terrible things, Jonah couldn’t bring himself to love them, even when his explicit mission from God was to call them to repentance and salvation. The fact that he still wanted them destroyed after they had repented and turned to follow God shows that Jonah was a nationalist, not a patriot—and a stubborn one at that.

Differentiating between the real and the overblown threat of Christian nationalism is an important element of responsible citizenship. We must acknowledge a sliver of dangerous and disturbing rhetoric coming from certain Christian circles while taking care not to define Christian nationalism so broadly that we capture normal American politics in our net.

While we can inordinately love our country, we can also inordinately hate it. We must properly lament the sins of our nation while insisting on appreciating its blessings. To do otherwise would be to work against the civil rights tradition, in which everyone from William Lloyd Garrison to Frederick Douglass to the NAACP to Martin Luther King Jr. insisted on the moral authority that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution gave them to fight for the appropriate inclusion of all in the rights and privileges of American citizenship.

Patriotism rejects claims of ethnic superiority over the inhabitants of other nations, but that doesn’t mean it can’t acknowledge that some nations are exceptional when it comes to certain elements of their cultures or political systems. Every nation on earth has something to lament and something to celebrate. Some nations are famous for their food, others for their natural beauty, others for their art and culture.

America is exceptional in its politics. Its origin story really was without precedent—a true social contract. Its founding documents were revolutionary in their claims of moral and legal equality, creating a striking foil when the nation falls into hypocrisy. And in the bloodiest and most totalitarian of all centuries, America’s role as a stabilizing world power—even with many, many unjust choices—proved an overall gain for freedom-seeking people around the world.

In reaction to the excesses of the left, we’re seeing a sudden turn among famous atheists toward the utilitarian case for religion in society. On the other hand, polling shows that a huge portion of Americans who identify as evangelical do not attend church. Presumably, these two groups associate Christianity with a commitment to truth and a certain kind of cultural groundedness but not necessarily with a life of discipleship to the risen Jesus.

Neither Darling nor I deny that Christianity can play a useful role in grounding and stabilizing society. But our New Atheist friends and their churchless evangelical compatriots may not grasp how much it matters that the faith and commitment be real for them to have the consummate effect. Neither a personally nor a socially effective faith can be cultivated by oneself. Darling condemns the lone-ranger mentality commonly seen among those who identify as American evangelicals. This approach to faith enables the totalizing ideologies we see today on both the left and the right by removing believers from the schoolhouse of grace.

While nonbelieving or nominally Christian citizens can recognize the social usefulness of Christianity, only true believers can successfully reinvigorate the institutions whose loss is creating the most destruction: the family, masculinity, education, and civil discourse.

Progressives need to recognize that the unrelenting cultural attack against these foundations of the social fabric has been alienating and destructive. And some progressives have, including Richard Reeves on masculinity, David Blankenhorn on fatherhood, and Melissa Kearney on the two-parent privilege. However, the conservative Christian tribe can often turn a legitimate cultural battle into a mindless culture war. These fundamental moral issues are worth fighting for, but just as Paul exhorts us to live with others in peace whenever possible (Rom. 12:18), we ought to use our love, wisdom, and self-control to press for solutions.

Darling can’t answer every question in this book. Libertarians may object that his encouragement to vote doesn’t solve the rational action problem around low incentives to stay informed. Libertarians and progressives might raise the concern that distinctions between legitimate and illegitimate global action are fine in theory but in practice are subject to the cronyism of the military-industrial complex. Old-fashioned liberals may object that conservatives’ willingness to embrace the Civil Rights Movement now doesn’t answer for the unwillingness of many at the relevant moment.

This kind of pushback is fair enough, but so is the conservative response: Critique of the voting system or of the role of our military does not a positive program make. We still need to determine election outcomes by voting, and we still have to decide whether our departure from this or that global arena will leave a destructive vacuum. Darling admits readily that conservatives had to learn an important lesson when it came to civil rights, but I ask, did progressives learn their lesson from the terrible consequences that followed the social engineering of their utopian federal programs?

Fittingly, Darling closes the book with an encomium to the local and a call to build up our institutions for the good of the neighborhood. His call to vote, run for election, and engage policy questions responsibly does not necessarily translate to a fixation on the nation. After all, a robust Christian patriotism is probably best represented by nothing other than our own towns’ Fourth of July parades.

It’s these kinds of connections—families uniting in their neighborhoods to celebrate the country, cheering for veterans who fought to protect freedom on the other side of an ocean—that undergird the myriad of institutions we desperately need to function well. The great insight of the conservative is that institutions are easy to tear down but hard to build, so “seek the peace and prosperity of the city to which I have carried you into exile” and “pray to the Lord for it, because if it prospers, you too will prosper” (Jer. 29:7).

Rachel Ferguson is director of the Free Enterprise Center at Concordia University Chicago, assistant dean of its College of Business, and professor of business ethics. She is coauthor of Black Liberation Through the Marketplace: Hope, Heartbreak, and the Promise of America

Theology

Who Are the Ismaili Muslims?

The history of this small Shiite sect includes assassinations, persecution, and periods of adherence to pluralism.

A exhibition from the collection of the Aga Khan Trust for Culture in Berlin, Germany, showing traditional Islamic art.

A exhibition from the collection of the Aga Khan Trust for Culture in Berlin, Germany, showing traditional Islamic art.

Christianity Today November 4, 2025
Sean Gallup / Staff / Getty

This is the second of a two-part series on Ismailism, a branch of Shiite Islam. To read part 1, click here.

An 11-acre Ismaili Muslim religious center is coming to Texas.

Part one of this two-part series described how the small sect of Shiite Islam will soon open the huge prayer hall and social center in Houston. Ismaili leaders emphasize an adherence to pluralism and interfaith dialogue, and this article will discuss how this assertion fits—or clashes—with Ismaili history.

For Ismailis today, who number between 12 and 15 million, pluralism is more than a commitment—it is near dogma. That is due to the center’s subsect, Nizari Ismailism, and its distinguishing feature: the living imam. Most Shiite Muslims name the leader of the Islamic community an imam, but only the Nizari sect claims he is alive and actively present in the world today.

And the imam’s legitimacy originates in his descend from Muhammad.

Islam’s prophet married and had several children, but only his daughter Fatimah survived to adulthood. She married Ali, Muhammad’s nephew and adopted son, and they had two daughters and three sons, one of whom likely died in infancy. All Muslims hold these descendants in high regard, and the current king of Jordan is one of thousands who trace their lineage back to Muhammad.

Yet the branches of Islam divided over who they saw as Muhammad’s true heir. Shiites believe that prior to his death, Muhammad designated Ali as his political and spiritual successor, so they call him “imam.” They also elevate Ali, Fatimah, and their sons Hasan and Hussein as Ahl al-Bayt, “the family of [Muhammad’s] household,” and believe these five received divine knowledge and infallibility. Only Muhammad holds the title of prophet, but his grandsons, in turn, became the second and third imams.

Sunni Muslims reject the claim of special favor, but honor Ali as the fourth community-chosen caliph, the highest Islamic political office. They dismiss the idea that an imam or any other human can inherit Muhammad’s aura of divine guidance.

Sunnis won the ensuing civil war in Islam and then set up a hereditary caliphate. Shiites rallied around Ahl al-Bayt, with some rebelling against the caliph’s authority and others adopting a quiet posture of perseverance. The majority, known as Twelvers, trace a line of 12 imams who from Hussein are designated directly from father to son. Twelvers are prominent in Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, and Azerbaijan.

Ismailis, found primarily in Central Asia, East Africa, and the Indian subcontinent, separated over a disputed succession. In AD 765, the Shiite community faced a crisis when Jafar al-Sadiq, the sixth imam, died at home, allegedly poisoned by the Sunni caliph who had previously detained him. Many of his followers believed he had designated his oldest son, Ismail, as the next imam—who died two years earlier than his father.

Sadiq’s other sons claimed Shiite leadership, with Twelvers following Musa al-Kazim as the seventh imam. But the crisis was more than just political—it was theological.

If an imam is infallible, how could he wrongly designate his successor? A dissenting party no longer in existence concluded that Ismail must still be alive and in hiding. Others held that Ismail’s son Muhammad should next inherit leadership, consistent with the father-to-son pattern. Most Ismailis today follow this line, and their head, known as Aga Khan V, is the 50th imam in the succession.

A century later, a different theological crisis hit the Twelver community. In AD 874, the eleventh imam died without an obvious heir. Consensus emerged that he did have a son who went into “occultation,” concealed from public view. Yet he never reappeared, and Twelvers judged that this Hidden Imam, miraculously preserved, will return to rule at the end of the age. Until then, fallible Shiite scholars lead the community.

In contrast, Ismailis offered Muslims a living imam, and their popularity surged as Twelvers fell into confusion over issues of leadership. As the inheritor of the leadership of Muhammad, Ali, and all proceeding figures in his line, the current Aga Khan—living today in Geneva, Switzerland—is believed by adherents to speak infallibly in spiritual matters and religious guidance. Similar to the pope in Catholicism, this infallibility does not carry over into his personal life or political choices. But when the time approaches, he will authoritatively designate his successor.

Today, the Aga Khan’s guidance is decidedly in favor of pluralism. But as with many religious traditions, Ismaili history is checkered. As a minority religious group, at times Ismailis have felt compelled to hide their faith. At other times they fought fiercely for political power. And in the 9th century their numeric growth helped establish a caliphate of their own.

During their two-century rule from Cairo, the Ismaili Fatimid empire treated Coptic Christians relatively well, governing a diverse population that included a Sunni majority. While Ismailis taught their faith and established the renowned Al-Azhar University as an Ismaili center, they did not impose their doctrines on the population.

One imam, however, reversed this toleration. Al-Hakim required Jews and Christians to wear distinctive clothing, banned the celebration of Easter, and destroyed several churches. His policies appeared to follow political convenience, as he later lessened the persecution and turned against his fellow Shiite rivals.

These rivalries continued. When a later Fatimid imam died in AD 1094, his powerful adviser favored the younger son al-Mustali over firstborn Nizar. The majority branch of Ismailis today believe Nizar was the designated imam, yet he was killed in his subsequent revolt. A minority, primarily in India, believes a descendent of al-Mustali, hidden from public view, remains the rightful Muslim ruler.

The Mustali Ismailis maintained their rule over Fatimid Cairo and expelled from Egypt a Nizari missionary who continued spreading the faith. Hasan Sabbah eventually returned to his native Iran and secured control of a mountain fortress, from which he established another political entity and the Order of Assassins, which killed dozens of high-profile political leaders. Legends carried to Europe by returning crusaders spoke of an elite unit of drug-crazed yet professional hitmen, trained in majestic gardens and surrounded by harems of beautiful women.

Explorer Marco Polo told stories of the medieval Hashishin. The English word assassin is derived from the Arabic word for the narcotic hashish, but modern scholarship refutes the legitimacy of this connection, as there is no evidence of drug use by the order.

History does chronicle the assassins’ murder of two Muslim caliphs and the crusader king designate of Jerusalem, alongside numerous other Islamic and Christian leaders. Ismaili sources cast doubt on their responsibility for some of these assassinations, describing instead a policy of self-defense from within scattered mountain fortresses.

For centuries, Ismailis say, Sunni authorities harshly persecuted them. They skinned Ismaili leaders alive, threw them into bonfires, and crucified them on city walls. And when the Mongols ransacked Muslim territories in the 13th century, some estimates place Ismaili deaths at more than 100,000. A Sunni historian said “no trace was left” of their community.

Ismailis ensured their survival through a policy of taqiyya—an Arabic word meaning “dissimulation,” the hiding of one’s true beliefs under duress. Early leaders pretended to be merchants as they directed a missionary campaign in Sunni-led Syria. Another leader escaped the Mongols by disguising himself as an embroiderer. Later, Ismaili adherents posed as Sunnis, members of other Shiite sects, or even Hindus to blend in locally.

Some Christians cite taqiyya as a reason not to trust Muslims, calling it permission to lie. Other Christians dismiss this claim as false, as do Shiite leaders. But some Ismailis have used deception as a tactic. The founder of their ministate in northern Iran first gained access to the fortress by pretending to be a schoolteacher and then converting the garrison forces. During the Crusades some Ismailis switched sides between Christian lords and Sunni caliphs. And to kill one leading Sunni adviser, an assassin presented himself as a Muslim mystic.

While fleeing Mongol persecution, one Ismaili imam, Shams al-Din Muhammad, reportedly said that taqiyya is “my religion and the religion of my ancestors.” The early imams relied on the practice, Shiites say, to protect the line of the prophet from one generation to the next against Sunni authorities who allegedly poisoned Shiite leaders. Other imams outwardly cooperated with the caliphs while hiding their inner conviction of leadership, hoping to secure greater freedom for their community. Because Shiites saw the imam’s example as infallible, they took up the practice of taqiyya as a community resource.

Ismailis only reemerged as a distinct community in the 19th century when the Shiite Qajar state in Iran appointed the first Aga Khan as a regional governor. After a failed rebellion, he fled to Afghanistan, befriended the British, and settled in India. There the Ismaili imam won a legal case to be the exclusive religious representative of the wealthy Khoja merchant community. Under colonial rule the Aga Khan became a cofounder of the All-India Muslim League and gained global prominence as an Islamic spokesman.

Modern Aga Khans went on to call for inter-Muslim unity worldwide. This is a model for today, Ismailis say, for much blood has been shed between the sects, then and now. Aga Khans also pursued international consensus, and Muhammad Shah, the third in the modern Ismaili line of leadership, became president of the post–World War I League of Nations.

“The tribulations of one people are the tribulations of all,” stated Aga Khan III to the assembly in 1937. “This is no empty ideal. It is a veritable compass to guide aright the efforts of statesmen in every country and of all men of good will who, desiring the good of their own people, desire the good of the whole world.”

At his accession speech as Aga Khan V last February, Prince Rahim, the 50th Nizari Ismaili imam extended a similar vision of tolerance for all humanity. He committed to continuing the work of the Aga Khan Development Network, whose interfaith work was described in part one of this series. As his worldwide community pledged their allegiance to his leadership, he urged them to be loyal and active citizens of the countries in which they live.

Correction: An earlier version of the story misstated the city where Aga Khan V lives and the name of the Aga Khan Development Network.

Church Life

A Pastor Stood Up to Persecution in India. Christianity Spread.

“It is very scary out there. … But the Holy Spirit reminds [me] that ‘for when I am weak, then I am strong.’”

Women working in a paddy field in the Malkangiri tribal district of India.

Women working in a paddy field in the Malkangiri tribal district of India.

Christianity Today November 4, 2025
NurPhoto / Contributor / Getty

In Malkangiri district of Odisha state in eastern India, tribal Christian farmers gathered on an overcast Saturday in June for an annual prayer gathering for the upcoming sowing season. The farmers placed their earthen pots filled with seeds by the pulpit, then knelt as the pastors blessed the seeds.

Suddenly, a mob of 200 Hindu fundamentalists attacked. Pictures from the site on June 21 show broken pots and pools of blood that turned a place of blessing and worship into a scene of horror.

When church members held a peace rally on the street outside the district administration office, condemning the attack, they became the focus of the police’s attention, said Bipul Prasad, the pastor who had planted the church.

While there is no evidence that police registered a case against the perpetrators, “we are now being framed with a false case,” Prasad said with quiet resignation.

Prasad, 49, is accustomed to this type of treatment for his faith. For the past two decades, Prasad has faced beatings, financial loss, and police surveillance for his ministry to reach his own Koya tribe with the gospel. Christianity Today agreed not to use Prasad’s real name or any of his identifiable information, as he could face increased attacks from Hindu nationalist groups.

Yet persecution hasn’t stopped the gospel from spreading in the rugged and densely forested Malkangiri district. Today, Prasad and a team of 25 disciples oversee the 72 churches he has planted in Malkangiri while continuing to share the Good News of the “God of love” to the Koya tribal community, he said. Besides being a pastor, Prasad is also an activist who uses his experience of suffering to counsel Christian victims of persecution, raise cases with police, and pursue legal remedies.

“From a human point of view, it is very scary out there, and I won’t be able to step out of my home. But the Holy Spirit reminds [me] that ‘for when I am weak, then I am strong,’” he said, quoting 2 Corinthians 12:10.

With the rise of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to national power in 2014, the tribal heartlands of Odisha and Chhattisgarh have become battlegrounds between tribal Christians and Hindu nationalists, according to A. C. Michael, the national coordinator of the United Christian Forum (UCF).

In Odisha, the UCF documented 14 incidents of physical assault, damage to property, restrictions on religious assembly, intimidation, and harassment in 2024, up from single digits a decade ago. The neighboring state of Chhattisgarh reported 165 incidents in 2024, up from 29 incidents in 2014. UCF added a caveat that its data is based solely on self-reporting by the victims. The real figures could be much higher, as most incidents go unreported due to fear of retribution.

Prasad’s first brush with persecution came in 2007. Villagers in the remote hamlet of Koikonda warned the young pastor not to visit and spread the “foreign religion,” he said. Yet Prasad still quietly went to pray with two new converts. About 20 minutes later, around 200 people mobbed the house they were in, cursing him.

The two new converts escaped, but the armed men attacked Prasad with sticks and stones until he fell unconscious. The next thing he remembers is waking up in the hospital, regaining consciousness from a coma after six days. He had injuries on his head, chest, abdomen, and legs. It took months to recover.

Sensing trouble in Odisha, Prasad’s mission organization sent him to minister in Jagdalpur and Bilaspur in the neighboring Chhattisgarh state in 2008. Yet his heart longed for his home of Malkangiri. For a year, he preached the gospel in Chhattisgarh, all the while praying for clarity about God’s plan for his life and ministry.

During one of his night prayers, he said he heard Jesus tell him, “What about Malkangiri?”

So after leading a New Year service in Bilaspur in January 2009, he resigned from the missionary organization and headed back to Malkangiri. He moved to the Koya village of Gongola.

Many of Prasad’s fellow ministers questioned his decision to move back to Odisha, where Christians faced great opposition. Hindu fundamentalist groups prowled tribal areas, attacking Christian converts. Fear still gripped Christians in the state after mobs burned and killed Australian missionary Graham Staines and his two sons in 1999.

Within months after Prasad returned, Odisha witnessed the horrific Kandhamal violence, where Hindu extremists killed more than 100 Christians and razed 6,500 homes, 400 churches, and Christian institutions.

Yet Prasad hoped for a revival, motivated by his call to return to Malkangiri. He quietly went to tribal hamlets to tell locals about the Good News of Jesus. He held small prayer gatherings. He avoided using loudspeakers like other evangelists so he wouldn’t draw attention to himself. Collaborating with fellow pastors in the villages, he nurtured converts in their newfound spiritual journeys.

Still, he had frequent run-ins with Hindu fanatics who opposed him for allegedly “forcibly converting people to a foreign religion,” he said.

In 2011, Prasad started a school with 20 tribal children on a piece of land donated by one of the new converts. He hired young adults from Christian families as teachers and offered free education to children from poor families.

The school drew support from locals of all religions. Villagers petitioned local authorities to support and expand the school’s work. In 2015, the local administration allotted a one-acre plot outside the village to build a proper building, which went on to provide education to 250 tribal children from 30 nearby villages. It was the only English-language school within a 100-kilometer (62-mile) radius, Prasad said.

With the school garnering popular support locally, the Hindu extremist organization Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) began to spread misinformation. It accused the school’s management of distributing Bibles and conducting Christian prayers every day with an intention to convert the children. Yet Prasad noted that the school never pressured the students to convert or to join in prayers.

“It was a conspiracy by the RSS, as one of its leaders opened a school locally in 2016,” Prasad said. “The intention behind the propaganda was to take away children from my school.”

In June 2019, the local administration sent a notice to Prasad, accusing him of illegally operating the school on government land. Despite relevant paperwork to reject the claim and protests by students and parents, the government razed the school to the ground. The destruction left 250 children without a school, and it did even more damage: Prasad, his family, and 12 orphans had lived on the campus. They had to find a new home.

“It felt as if life had been snuffed out of me as the buildings came crashing down,” Prasad said. “Hundreds of contributions, years of strenuous efforts, and close to Rs 70 lakh [about $80,000 USD] were destroyed in a matter of minutes.”

Yet paradoxically, the destruction of the school led more locals to Christ. As villagers saw Prasad pray for the attackers, they noticed a difference between his message of peace and the RSS’s message of hatred. Prasad said many locals believed in Jesus as a result. “The Lord works in mysterious ways,” he said.

To date, Prasad said, he has baptized 700 people. His ministry shepherds nearly 3,500 tribal Christians across 72 churches. Most churches meet in thatched-roof homes, backyards, or mats spread out under trees in the fields.

Due to his own experiences facing persecution from Hindu nationalists, Prasad advocates for the rights of tribal Christians, organizing peaceful protests, raising issues with local authorities, and participating in Malkangiri’s Christian forums to push for justice and protection. He faces increasing challenges: The little legal, financial, and material aid he receives from Christian organizations outside Malkangiri is also becoming hard to come by due to rising scrutiny of Christian relief work.

Yet Prasad continues to take the gospel to the remotest corners of Malkangiri, whether by worn-out cars or by motorbikes or by foot. He looks up to 19th-century Africa missionary David Livingstone as he clings to Philippians 1:21, which says, “For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain.”

addApple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseellipseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squarefolderGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastprintremoveRSSRSSSaveSavesaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube