Graham Crusade: Third Time’s a Charm

Continuing a sweep through Pennsylvania and Ohio, Billy Graham staged his third Pittsburgh crusade last month. The effort was marked by an ecumenical cooperation that saw 1,050 churches and 65 denominations come together.

“I know that the gospel of Christ can transform individuals and bring a new spirit in a community,” Graham said. In spite of cold, rainy weather during its first four days, 171,500 persons attended the June 2–6 crusade at Three Rivers Stadium, 12,515 of them making commitments to Christ. Although the crusade had a rocky financial beginning, large gifts from wealthy contributors in the last two months brought the crusade in at $180,000 above its $1.45 million budget. Chaired by Fred Fetterolf, retired Alcoa chairman and an Episcopalian, the crusade in largely Roman Catholic Pittsburgh had six Catholics on the executive committee. Earlier crusades did not include invitations to Pittsburgh Catholic Diocese officials. This time, Graham met with eight bishops and executives from Catholic and Protestant groups.

Graham’s previous Pittsburgh crusades were in 1952 and 1968. The 1993 crusade came from invitations by 250 religious leaders following Graham’s visit to the neighboring city of Greensburg after 13 of its residents died during an Iraqi Scud missile attack in the Persian Gulf war. In a two-year sweep through the region, Graham will appear twice in Pennsylvania and twice in Ohio. The regional thrust began with last year’s Philadelphia crusade and will end with crusades this fall in Columbus and next spring in Cleveland.

At a press conference, Graham spoke about President Bill Clinton and suggested that Americans “have a little patience” with the President and pray for him. Graham said he is a friend of the Clintons, although, “I don’t always agree with them, of course.”

When talking with reporters, he appeared hard of hearing and a bit rambling; however, once he began to preach, the years seemed to fall away, and the fire returned to his gestures and face. The 74-year-old Graham’s sermons were more folksy than usual, and he made several humorous references to his age. His sermons also were sprinkled with references to Pittsburgh sports and warnings to youth against premarital sex and hedonism. In one sermon, he blamed women for equal responsibility in illicit sexual activity: “She tries to look in such a way that men will be sexually attracted to her.” When a local newpaper criticized Graham for playing down sexual harassment, he took the unusual step of apologizing publicly for his statement.

In an attempt to repeat the success of a Saturday afternoon kid’s crusade last year in Portland, Oregon, Graham’s organization staged a second kid’s crusade in Pittsburgh. Because of the inclement weather, the attendance was 17,000—compared with 38,000 in Portland; yet 13 percent of the children who attended made a Christian commitment.

By Julia Duin in Pittsburgh.

Our Latest

News

‘I’m Not Being Disrespectful, Mama. I Just Don’t Understand.’

America’s crisis of reading instruction is by now well-known. But have you checked on your kid’s math skills lately?

The Bulletin

Sunday Afternoon Reads: Lord of the Night

Finding God in the darkness and isolation of Antarctica.

The Russell Moore Show

Why Do Faithful Christians Defend Harmful Things?

Russell answers a listener question about how we should perceive seemingly harmful political beliefs in our church congregations.

The Complicated Legacy of Jesse Jackson

Six Christian leaders reflect on the civil rights giant’s triumphs and tragedies.

News

The Churches That Fought for Due Process

An Ecuadorian immigrant with legal status fell into a detention “black hole.” Church leaders across the country tried to pull him out.

The Bulletin

AI Predictions, Climate Policy Rollback, and Obama’s Belief in Aliens

Mike Cosper, Clarissa Moll, Russell Moore

The future of artificial intelligence, Trump repeals landmark climate finding, and the existence of aliens.

Troubling Moral Issues in 1973

CT condemned the Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade and questioned the seriousness of Watergate.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastprintRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube