Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
May 9, 2008
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Home > 2008 > FebruaryChristianity Today, February, 2008  |   |  
The Future Lies in the Past
Why evangelicals are connecting with the early church as they move into the 21st century.



ADVERTISEMENT

Last spring, something was stirring under the white steeple of the Billy Graham Center at Wheaton College.

A motley group of young and clean-cut, goateed and pierced, white-haired and bespectacled filled the center's Barrows Auditorium. They joined their voices to sing of "the saints who nobly fought of old" and "mystic communion with those whose rest is won." A speaker walked an attentive crowd through prayers from the 5th-century Gelasian Sacramentary, recommending its forms as templates for worship in today's Protestant churches. Another speaker highlighted the pastoral strengths of the medieval fourfold hermeneutic. Yet another gleefully passed on the news that Liberty University had observed the liturgical season of Lent. The t-word—that old Protestant nemesis, tradition—echoed through the halls.

Just what was going on in this veritable shrine to pragmatic evangelistic methods and no-nonsense, back-to-the-Bible Protestant conservatism? Had Catholics taken over?

No, this was the 2007 Wheaton Theology Conference, whose theme was "The Ancient Faith for the Church's Future." Here, the words spoken 15 years ago by Drew University theologian and CT senior editor Thomas Oden rang true: "The sons and daughters of modernity are rediscovering the neglected beauty of classical Christian teaching. It is a moment of joy, of beholding anew what had been nearly forgotten, of hugging a lost child."

The conference's Call for Papers likewise rejoiced: "One of the most promising developments among evangelical Protestants is the recent 'discovery' of the rich biblical, spiritual, and theological treasures to be found within the early church." In particular, it said, evangelicals are beginning to "reach back behind the European Enlightenment for patterns and models of how to faithfully read Scripture, worship, and engage a religiously diverse culture."

Baylor University's D. H. Williams, author of Evangelicals and Tradition, testified at the conference to the recent upsurge of evangelical interest in patristics (the study of the church fathers in the first seven centuries of the church): "Who would have thought, a decade ago, that one of the most vibrant and serious fields of Christian study at the beginning of the 21st century would be the ancient church fathers? There has been an opening of new avenues, especially among free-church Protestants, by the almost overnight popularity of bishops and monks, martyrs and apologists, philosophers and historians who first fashioned a Christian culture 1,500 years ago."

This conference was certainly not the first of its kind; in fact, many evangelicals had been looking to the early church for guidance for years. But in some ways, the conference represented a coming of age for a worship renewal movement begun some 30 years before.

Surge Into the Past

If only the man behind the conference, the elder statesman of "ancient-future faith," could have been there to watch the excitement of young and old conferees alike. But Robert Webber of Northern Seminary (and formerly of Wheaton) could not be present. He was in the late stages of cancer. His chair at the conference banquet table was vacant, as colleagues stood to honor his influence on them personally and on the whole church. Weeks after the conference, evangelical Christianity lost its premier ambassador for reengagement with history.

In 1978, Webber had begun his groundbreaking Common Roots: A Call to Evangelical Maturity by throwing down the gauntlet: "My argument is that the era of the early church (A.D. 100–500), and particularly the second century, contains insights which evangelicals need to recover." Twenty-five years later, he could rejoice in the pages of his Younger Evangelicals that they "want to immerse themselves in the past and form a culture that is connected to the past, a culture that remembers its tradition as it moves into the future." Webber observed—with what we now know was not mere wishful thinking—that evangelicals had entered the new millennium by surging into the past.





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 47 comments.See all comments
Raymond Takashi Swenson   Posted: February 08, 2008 5:51 PM
Several commenters are correct in noting that there is a lot of difference between the First Century church that had the apostles and the later developments in Christianity that veered away from that Primitive Church in organization and doctrine. Indeed, the roots of many of the issues that led to the Reformation were developed by the 5th Century, and these led to the assertion that Roman Catholicism had lost its way from the original Christianity of the era when the New Testament was written by the apostles and their inspired aids, like Luke. One object of studying the Church Fathers should be to recover what the New Testament church and the Apostles actually taught, so that we understand the New Testament better in context of the interpretations given by the Apsotles themselves and other first hand witnesses, like Ignatius of Antioch. They should be prepared to learn that some of the cherished theories of Protestantism do not match what the earliest Christians believed.

GHBullen   Posted: February 11, 2008 11:40 AM
As a student of church history at Bob Jones University in the 1980s, I learned to respect the church fathers and to regard their writings as relevant to my life. Today I live in a Michigan town with a Protestant church every couple of blocks, but I have found few that have a real sense of tradition beyond their own founding (my church dates back to the 1840s). This article and the movement it describes echoes my own desire for connection with my brothers and sisters of the past.

Mary L. Doerflein   Posted: February 19, 2008 3:33 PM
Excellent in its presentation but forgetting that the "ancients" who were then modern were eaten by lions, who said "Jesus is Lord," invoked their death sentence, who defied Rome were lashed, who, during the Inquisitions were burned at the stake, who now in other countries, are targets for political bullets and bombs; forgetting also that "ancient" Christians needed to rely on creeds, etc., because they rarely had the ancient texts (now our Bibles) which spelled out reliance on the Holy Spirit. Tradition and creeds may or may not be scriptural, i.e., "one baptism for the forgiveness of sins." Baptism did not die for me, nor did tradition; Jesus did. In my opinion, many of us are more like the sown seed squelched by the "cares and pleasures of this life," slowly being smothered by our enticing culture and a coddling "Christianity" which seeks to please. So, bring on the lions?

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christian History & Biography
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Ignite Your Faith
Leadership Journal
Marriage Partnership
Men of Integrity
Today's Christian
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com