Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
May 14, 2008
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Home > 2008 > May (Web-only)Christianity Today, May (Web-only), 2008  |   |  
Emergent's New Christians and the Young and Restless Reformed
Tony Jones and Collin Hansen find connections as they discuss each other's books and movements.



ADVERTISEMENT

The New Christians: Dispatches from the Emergent Frontier
By Tony Jones
Jossey-Bass, March 2008
288 pp., $22.95

Young, Restless, Reformed: A Journalist's Journey with the New Calvinists
By: Collin Hansen
Crossway, March 2008
160 pp., $14.99

A new movement is attracting a younger generation of Christians, shaking up institutions, denominations, and churches along the way. Not everyone in the movement is attracted to it for the same reasons, but they gather at conferences and online to share thoughts, debate, and learn from the elder statesmen of the group. Now a new book attempts to explain, sympathetically, what's really going on.

Actually, it's two books, and two movements.

Collin Hansen's Young, Restless, Reformed started as a September 2006 Christianity Today article. Now editor-at-large for Christianity Today, Hansen has examined why many young Christians are drawn to Calvinism, whom these new Calvinists are listening to, and what they're passionate about.

Hansen's book begins with a note comparing the relative obscurity of the new Calvinism and the prominence of the emerging church. Among his interviewees was Tony Jones, national coordinator of Emergent Village, and author of the new book The New Christians: Dispatches from the Emergent Frontier.

Jones is the author of several previous books, but The New Christians is more journalistic in its approach, describing the origins of the emerging church, why it's growing, and how it's changing.

The books and movements share a number of themes: reaction against entertainment-driven church life, desire for transcendence, rediscovery of tradition, and a need to answer common misconceptions about the movements. Christianity Today invited Hansen and Jones to read each other's books and discuss how the rise of one movement might illuminate aspects of the rise of the other. Are both movements scratching the same itch? Are there internal tensions in one movement that also appear in the other?

The conversation will continue over several days.

* * *

Tony,

I appreciate how The New Christians recounts the history of Emergent, told through compelling stories and an explanation of its distinctive beliefs. Your analysis of the two emerging camps was helpful. One camp advocates an unchanging gospel message paired with new ministry methods. Siding with the other camp, you write, "To try to freeze one particular articulation of the gospel, to make it timeless and universally applicable, actually does an injustice to the gospel." I don't see Jesus or the biblical authors granting us the warrant to change their gospel message. But to a certain extent, I agree that when we alter the methods of gospel ministry, we inevitably change the gospel message itself. This point is too often missed when we evaluate the "seeker sensitive" methods of many evangelical megachurches.

I felt a certain kinship while reading your book. For one thing, we both grew up in the Midwest attending mainline Protestant churches. Then we left home to attend private colleges, where we became involved with Campus Crusade for Christ. Our experiences with Crusade were quite different, and your story helped me appreciate this ministry's strengths as well as some of its weaknesses. I recently spoke with Crusade leaders who advocate more theology training for staff, and this development has already led to significant changes.

I found in your book a fundamental appreciation for the importance of theology. Now, our conversation will make it clear that we reach very different conclusions about that theology. But the young evangelicals I wrote about share your surprise and dismay with the message you heard from Leadership Network: "Theology just causes people to argue. We don't do theology." In both our books, there is a recurring theme of faith evidenced by works. Theology that only makes you argue is a theology not worth arguing. Doing theology means putting it into practice.





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 21 comments.See all comments
James Reid Ross   Posted: May 04, 2008 2:47 AM
Very interested in this conversation too mainly interested about any movement of the Holy Spirit in the Reformed church member of a PCUSA congreation a body of Christ we need the Holy Spirit to work in revitalizing our denomination. According to the Evangelical dictionary of Theology a Presbyterian minister was part of the earliest reimergence of the Holy Spirit in the early days. I have often think that when one becomes blessed in the Spirit they often seek out congregations or denominations that are known to be Spirit led. I believe this weakens the Body of Christ unless you are ostracized by your church being salt and light is what we are about. Never should one exault themselves above other by the blessing of the Holy Spirit. As the apostle Paul said "Ye who are spiritual should restore them" led me to believe that all are not blessed the same way Spiritually. My prayer is that we should have evangelist in PCUSA that minister in the Gifts in the Reformed Tradition.

Dan Ra   Posted: May 02, 2008 3:01 PM
I'm proud of CT engaging in this kind of dialogue. Reformed Evangelicals need to stop portraying Emergents as washy liberals as much as Emergents need to stop portraying Reformed Evangelicals as modern-day pharisees (I admit I do the latter). Not to say there isn't those kinds within each "camp." But I'm glad CT is allowing both groups to healthily validate each other in Christian unity. Amen!

Leroy   Posted: May 02, 2008 9:45 AM
Interesting conversation rife with confusion. Seems the emergent church has become of a movement or denomination, polemical, reactionary and misguided. The megachurch movement is dead. The old guard evangelicals who were cooped by the right in their lust for power and influence (Dobson; Fawell) are dying off while the Evangelical Left (Wallis;Campolo) are lining up for their own long waited 15 minutes in November. And Calvinism is rearing its head in the morass of uncertainty. Obviously, but perhaps not to them, Tony/Collin need to develop a fuller appreciation for the nuances of postmodernism, which is far more a critique of modernism and the deconstruction of controlling narratives or meta-histories, than a substitute philosophy upon which to build. And they desperately need to understand that theology is the tail wagging the dog. You can proof text your Calvinism all you want, but it remains a man-made system reflecting the mind of its author' far more than the biblical text.


Rate and Comment on this article:

Choose star rating:  
Name: 

Comments:1000 character limit 
sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christian History & Biography
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Ignite Your Faith
Leadership Journal
Marriage Partnership
Men of Integrity
Today's Christian
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com