Past Imperfect
Ardor and Order
April 3 marked exactly 50 years since Episcopal priest Dennis Bennett resigned from his post as rector of St. Mark's Church in Van Nuys, California. He knew that his glowing talk about baptism in the Holy Spirit had provoked fear and resentment among some members of his congregation. He didn't know that he was about to become the central character in a new movement—the charismatic renewal of the mainline denominations. Soon, Bennett and his message were the subjects of stories in Newsweek and Time and the objects of international attention.
In April 1960, I was a seventh grader in Sheboygan, Wisconsin, culturally and religiously as distant from Southern California Episcopalians as an American could be. But by 1974, I had a newly minted M.Div. and became pastor of a church near San Diego. There I became friends with Frank Maguire, an Episcopal priest who featured prominently in Dennis Bennett's autobiographical Nine O'Clock in the Morning.
In 1959, Maguire had invited Bennett to meet members of his parish who were experiencing unusual spiritual phenomena. These folk weren't doing anything wild and crazy, Maguire told Bennett. They just glowed "like little light bulbs" and were "so loving and ready to help whenever I asked them." When I met Maguire almost 15 years later, the charismatics I met in his parish still weren't wild or crazy. And they still had the glow and the love Maguire had told Bennett about.
I had been raised in a sectarian atmosphere, trained to distrust Christianity of any stripe but my own. For me, what made the charismatic renewal remarkable was the ecumenical fellowship it created. American Baptists and Roman Catholics in our community were sharing Communion—even serving Communion at each other's churches—until the Catholic bishop put a stop to it. Episcopalians were worshiping with an intensity that undercut all my prejudices against written prayers and prescribed liturgies. Formerly competing religious communities were suddenly open to common ministry and shared worship. This was not the classic liberal ecumenism with its "Doctrine Divides, Service Unites" motto. This ecumenism flowed from recognizing that the Holy Spirit was animating and transforming others.
Some analysts say the mainline charismatic renewal fizzled. It is more accurate to describe it the way Jesus pictured the kingdom of God: like yeast that spreads through bread dough. You can hardly identify it as a movement anymore, but it has changed the way most churches worship. Repetitive choruses and raised hands are now common. Except in pockets of hardcore resistance, the fact that a fellow Christian may praise God in a private prayer language hardly elevates an eyebrow.
Pentecostalism and the charismatic renewal have jointly given believers what historian Chris Armstrong calls Pentecostalism's chief contribution to Christianity: an awareness of "a deep well of living water from which everything else flow[s] … the personal, relational presence of the living God."
That tide of living water is precisely what New Testament scholar Luke Timothy Johnson is worried might be receding. In a recent Commonweal essay, Johnson lamented the clash between the external, public dimension of religion—doctrine, sacraments, church structures (the "exoteric")—and the private search for a personal relationship with God (the "esoteric"). Johnson worries that the exoteric is whipping the esoteric. But what of the tremendous spread of Pentecostal and charismatic Christianity around the globe? Johnson's failure to mention it is puzzling.
Past Imperfect
- Jesus' Elevator Speech
- Who Defines Doctrine?
- Misreading the Magnificat
- Downton Abbey's Real Legacy
- The Hymns That Haunt Us
Star Trek Into Darkness

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).












Comments
Displaying 13 of 29 comments
See all comments
E.M. Williams
I wonder what Paul would think of most of our Christian gatherings? "How is it then, brethren? Whenever you come together, each of you has a psalm, has a teaching, has a tongue, has a revelation, has an interpretation. Let all things be one for edification." The typical church gathering has lost most of its body parts and is left with only the one mouth of the pastor.
Johann Conrad
What a load of nonsense. The Charismatic idea is not just a style of worship that we should tolerate or incorporate into our churches. It is an opposing and competing belief system that a Christian must either embrace or oppose. The claims of the Pentecostal/Charismatic are either true or false. Was God behind the "revival" at Azusa? Is God behind the Pentecostal/Charismatic explosion of the 20th century? Are all these miracle healings true or false? Is speaking in tongues a genuine miraculous gift or mere auto-suggestion or hypnosis? You CAN'T have it both ways. I contend that Pentecostalism is false and reject the whole system. Make your own choice, but don't be lukewarm.
Mary Darrell
The Charismatic Movement has not "fizzled out"; it has ended, i.e. as a Movement. As has been noted, it has been 50 years since its beginning. Now is a year of Jubilee: "And you shall consecrate the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land to all its inhabitants. It shall be a Jubilee for you; and each of you shall return to his possession, and each of you shall return to his family." Read all of Leviticus 25 to get the full picture. God is not static, and neither is His Plan. He is moving on. The word is out: we are in a time of God's New Paradigm!! If you could interview all of the people who were baptized in the Holy Spirit during those 50 years, you would find that, like myself, they would say that their lives were changed and never returned to the same way again. Thank God!