Do Christian Athletes Strike Out on Big-dollar Contracts?
ST. LOUIS—As contract talks broke down between Albert Pujols and the Cardinals, St. Louis baseball fans began nervously asking themselves a host of questions.
He's a Cardinal for life, right?
He wouldn't go to Wrigley Field because he likes winning too much, right?
But a particular group of Cardinals fans—those who share his evangelical faith—was asking a different kind of question. What does holding out for the largest contract in the history of baseball say about Albert's Christian testimony?
Pujols and his wife, Deidre, are evangelical Christians. They describe their charity, the Pujols Family Foundation, as "a faith-based nonprofit organization," and participate in Christian events around the city.
So as Pujols began looking to many like a typical mega-wealthy superstar athlete angling for a record payday, some have asked how Pujols' public, God-fearing image squares with a private quest for wealth.
Team officials have declined to describe the details of their offer to Pujols, but it's widely believed to have been worth about $200 million.
The Rev. Darrin Patrick, pastor of The Journey, a church in St. Louis that counts a number of professional athletes as members, said Jesus warned against greed.
"Nobody really confesses to that sin," Patrick said. "Lust, anxiety—sure. But very few people say, `I'm greedy,' and I absolutely think that (Pujols) should be on guard for that."
A verse from 1 Timothy says, "The love of money is a root of all kinds of evil, and in their eagerness to be rich some have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many pains."
That's the fear of many people who love Pujols, both as fans and as Christians. They fear, as the author of Matthew's Gospel wrote, that no one can serve two masters.
"For a slave will either hate the one and love the other, or be devoted to the one and despise the other," the Gospel says. "You cannot serve God and wealth."
The Rev. Sean Michael Lucas, a former professor at Covenant Seminary in Creve Coeur and currently pastor of a Presbyterian church in Hattiesburg, Miss., describes himself on his Twitter page as, among other things, "Cardinals fan, lover of Jesus."
At the end of January, Lucas tweeted, " … how is AP's testimony affected if he holds the Cards hostage for $30m/10yrs? @ what pt does 1 Tim 6:10 apply here?"
In another tweet, Lucas wrote, "Unless there is a big part of this contract that goes to Pujols Foundation ($30-50m) he's open 2 the question. Legitimately."
Baptist pastor Scott Lamb, the co-author (with Tim Ellsworth) of a new Pujols biography called Pujols: More Than the Game that focuses on the first baseman's faith, said the contract talks have opened up an interesting debate in Christian circles that goes beyond baseball to the uncomfortable intersection of the New Testament and capitalism.
"Consumption mentality is very American, but it's not very biblical," Lamb said. "People are asking whether (Pujols) should grab all he can get, and what his moral responsibilities are in terms of what to do with that money."
What to do with so much money has not always been a problem for the Pujolses. In 2000, when Albert was in the minor leagues in Peoria, Ill., and Memphis, Tenn., he was bringing in $125 a week.
By 2005, the couple set up their foundation to help children with Down syndrome, and children living in poverty in Albert's native Dominican Republic. In 2010, the foundation spent $800,000 on its programs, according to Todd Perry, its executive director.

The 'Handicap Icon' Gets New Life

Sidelining the Stigma of Mental Illness

Starting a Dialogue with Hip-Hop

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).












Comments
Displaying 13 of 21 comments
See all comments
Junias Venugopal
It is interesting that the owners are never mentioned for negotiating for their advantage - only the players. Is it because we are predisposed towards capitalism rather than the sharing of wealth? Further, is it possible that one's loyalty for a team (in this case Cardinals) would prevent us from seeing that another capitalistic principle - market value - is at play when Albert Pujols negotiates for the maximization of wealth! We can't have it both ways - if we are for capitalism, then we should be for Pujols. If not, then we should still be in favor of Pujols and other players getting their fair share from the owners. Either way, I think we should support those who do the work - after all it is them we go to cheer and it is their play that we enjoy. :-)
Winn Allison
I personally fight greed and envy not only with what I want, but over what I don't have. Let's pray for those in the limelight (athletes, actors, leaders) who claim Christ. They carry an extra burden with their celebrity status. What folks make and give and to what they give is their business. I don't have any right to judge their motive or intent. Jesus' word to Peter when the Big Fisherman questioned the Master about John is what I hear the Spirit saying to me when I get to comparing myself to another: "What is that to you? You follow Me!"
Joseph Lee
While I appreciate the author and his coverage of this subject, I think the writer is somewhat oblivious of all the different factors in play. One critical thing that is not mentioned in the article that does not do fair justice to the whole situation is the pressure that Pujols faces from the Players Association (and Union) and his agent. Because Pujols is considered the best player in MLB, there is pressure for him to have the best contract -- which affects other (preset and future) players' contract negotiations. Even if Pujols personally wants to take a lesser contract, most likely that will not happen because of the aforementioned factors.