Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 23, 2012

Home > 2012 > JanuaryChristianity Today, January, 2012
Cover Story
The Cure for Election Madness
How to be political without losing your soul.




Mark DeMoss, concerned about the increasingly harsh tone of public discourse, launched the Civility Project in January 2009. The Republican businessman and political adviser enlisted Democratic lobbyist and former Clinton aide Lanny Davis to help him. Together the two friends wrote to all 100 United States Senators, all 435 members of the House of Representatives, and all 50 state governors, asking each to sign a pledge promising, "I will be civil in my public discourse and behavior. I will be respectful of others whether or not I agree with them. I will stand against incivility when I see it."

How many of the 585 recipients agreed?

Three.

Two years later, DeMoss wrote to the legislators who had signed the pledge, Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman and Republican Representatives Frank Wolf and Sue Myrick, informing them he was closing the project. "You three were alone in pledging to be civil," DeMoss wrote. "I must admit to scratching my head as to why only three members of Congress, and no governors, would agree to what I believe is a rather low bar."

Thousands of private citizens showed their support by signing the pledge, but others attacked the project. In an interview, DeMoss described his surprise and dismay at the hostile response he received from fellow conservatives: Some of the e-mails contained "unbelievable language about communists, and some words I wouldn't use in this phone call," he explained. "This political divide has become so sharp that everything is black and white, and too many conservatives can see no redeeming value in any liberal or Democrat."

Why were so few of the nation's leaders willing to take such a simple and seemingly uncontroversial public stand? Why did so many web users respond to a call for civility and respect with vulgarity and vicious attacks? What might these events reveal about contemporary American politics?

Today's hyperpartisan and meanspirited political climate makes it difficult to engage in civil and meaningful dialogues. Indeed, the temperature of the political conversation seems to rise as elections draw near. In recent months, presidential candidates have maligned their opponents for their "finger-in-the-wind politics," "ignorance of basic economics," and "frugal socialism." In the 2008 campaign, one candidate said George W. Bush was "brain-dead." Conservative radio host Bill Bennett rallied the crowd at the 2010 Values Voters Summit with the call, "If you voted for [Obama] last time to prove you are not a racist, you must vote against him this time to prove you are not an idiot." Simple differences in perspective can quickly turn into fiery battles and over-the-top attacks.

Heated rhetoric can escalate beyond wars of words. When political opponents spend more time hurling insults and accusations at one another than gathering together to hammer out solutions to complicated problems, stalemates result. Politicians focus on pointing fingers and attributing blame instead of sincerely trying to accomplish the work that voters elected them to do. At its worst, bitter rancor can turn to violence.

Today's hyperpartisan and meanspirited political climate makes it very difficult to engage in civil and meaningful dialogues.

If we are to seek peaceful solutions and honor God in politics, we Christians of all people must avoid such hateful talk. James 4:11 commands us to "not slander one another," an exhortation that should extend beyond how we treat other believers. Whether talking with friends or campaigning for our favorite candidate or cause, we should engage our political opponents and their ideas with respect, welcome the opportunity to learn from other perspectives, and find ways to disagree charitably as a natural part of the political process.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 13 comments

Matthew Hamilton

January 13, 2012  8:03am

Also, I blogged about this kind of thing in response to another CT article about the so-called "biblical values" that politicians like to invent. hamiltonmj1983.wordpress.com

Matthew Hamilton

January 13, 2012  8:02am

@Original Anna I am pro-Obama, and I cannot stand the things that the tea party stands for, and I have received a ton of foul-mouth rhetoric from the "christian" and "evangelical" conservatives.

Original Anna

January 11, 2012  8:52pm

It isn't Christians doing the rough talk. If you pay attention to people posting on sites it is non Christians using foul language and name calling on Christian sites and non-Christian sites. They are so angry with themselves and unhappy with their lives they need to take it out on those they disagree with. Don't assume these foul mouth and nasty language users are Christians. They are on these sites to tear Christians down because they don't want to change their lives and follow Jesus. If you pay attention to the media, the nastiest "reporters" are pro Obama and can't stand tea partiers, or true conservatives. They love and want Romney to run because he is so Democratic in his views, he is not a Republican. These "reporters" make crude remarks, name call and insinuate activity they don't even prove. These people are not Christians. They are socialists and humanists. Non Christians and these "reporters" need to be labeled as they are. That would clean up a lot of non-civility.

CharlesC.

January 11, 2012  5:03pm

I concur with "Anonymous" whole heartedly - truly amazing and sad!

Anonymous

January 11, 2012  2:42pm

In an article on civility, the first thing I read in the comments, is an attack on a group of Christians because of their political affiliation. Amazing! LOL

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]

Rod and Reel, or Net?

Rod and Reel, or Net?

What it means to catch in community.

A 'Move' in the Right Direction

A 'Move' in the Right Direction

A new book takes a closer look at how churches foster spiritual growth.

more | current issue

Kyria

I Gave Up Worry for ...

Consider taking 40 days to give up a deep...

Books & Culture

Coming to Terms with Our Inheritance

Coming to Terms with...

Slaveholders, segregationists, all of us...

Small Group Dynamics

Recognizing a Blind ...

Learning from the introverts among us

Building Church Leaders

Coaching the Full Life

Coaching the Full Life...

Use the principles of coaching to lead people...

Managing Your Church Blog

Congress Extends Payroll...

Churches must verify employee withholdings...

Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper