“Education: Reading, Writing, Reform”

“Vouchers dropped, but testing, tax credits remain in Bush education plan”

At an elementary school in Huntsville, Alabama, Beth Melton has 19 third-graders in her classroom—about half of whom came to school last August barely able to read.

“They are far behind,” the teacher says, explaining that while her kids have made definite progress during recent months, it is unfair to compare them with children of greater advantage who live in more affluent areas of town.

Melton teaches at one of several Title I schools in north Huntsville. Under the Title I program, her school receives additional funding from the federal government because the majority of its students are on reduced or free lunch programs. Almost all students in the north part of the city are black. “Schools in Huntsville are extremely segregated,” Melton says.

It is places like this one that the Bush administration had in mind when it issued its blueprint for education reform in January. Congressional leaders are aiming to produce a bipartisan bill that would promote a greater sense of accountability and assistance for schools, where teachers such as Melton, 38, face the challenges of strengthening the basic skills of students.

Education experts agree that such schools need dramatic improvement. “We’re not successfully educating children of color and low-income as we are middle-class white children,” says Jim Scheurich, an education professor at the University of Texas-Austin.

Yet many educators remain unsure whether the proposed reforms will produce the right results. Bush’s proposal for annual tests, for example, does not persuade Melton, recently named Teacher of the Year at her school. In order to increase the accountability of schools, Bush has proposed that states test students in grades 3-8 each year. Forty-nine states have some kind of educational testing standards, but only 18 test students in grades 3-8 annually.

The government would use the results from annual exams to determine whether to reward or penalize schools for their performance. Successful schools would receive financial bonuses as well as more control over how they spend federal funds. (The Bush plan consolidates dozens of existing programs into a few block grants that states would administer.)

For unsuccessful schools where test scores remain low over time, however, the President initially proposed awarding vouchers to low-income students to pay for tuition at private schools, for tutoring expenses, or for other educational services. Academically failing schools would not receive a bonus and their administrative funds would be withheld. (Congressional Democrats blocked tuition vouchers from Bush’s education reform package, but they have agreed to support vouchers for private tutoring or relocation costs to another public school.)

Will Weak Schools Get Weaker? Nationwide, educators have formed varying opinions about student testing. Melton, for example, holds a different perspective on annual exams from that of her mother, Carolyn Bradley, who is also a teacher. An educator at a Christian school in Brevard County, Florida, Bradley thinks annual testing sharpens the skills of her students.

She also believes it is a way to keep her profession accountable. “We need some measure to be fair to children and parents to make sure we are doing our job,” Bradley says. “I think testing is good to see progress and to keep teachers on their toes.”

Melton, on the other hand, worries that such a plan would only further penalize the struggling students in her school who already lack a strong foundation. In Alabama, one of the 18 states that tests students every year, Melton says the exam fails to take into account a student’s background or learning disabilities.

“I’m not against testing, but the problem in Alabama is the test; they’re comparing apples and oranges,” she says, referring to rich and poor students who take the same statewide exams.

Melton fears that a federally mandated test would only worsen her school’s ability to help students, especially if her school’s scores were so low that the government instituted sanctions against it. Melton adamantly opposed Bush’s original voucher plan, which would have awarded low-income students in Title I schools a portion of Title I money for tuition at private or religious institutions. “I have a real problem with them taking that money out to give to a private school,” she says.

According to the Department of Education’s Web site, Title I services are provided to 6.4 million children in more than 14,000 school districts. A department official said the average per-pupil expenditure in schools that receive Title I money is around $500.

Tax Credits and the Poor Tuition vouchers also raise questions of possible church-state entanglement since public tax money would be funneled into private schools. The Family Research Council (FRC) endorses a separate Bush proposal to create educational tax credits for parents. Under one scenario, parents could receive an annual tax credit of up to $5,000 for money spent on educational resources, whether tuition or books.

“Politically, tax credits are the option to go with,” says Erika Lestelle, the FRC’s education policy analyst.

Some question the value of tax credits for the neediest students. “The poor don’t pay as much in the way of taxes,” says sociologist Tony Campolo, president of the Evangelical Association for the Promotion of Education. “It’s only those who are paying taxes that are going to benefit from this program. I see this as a great benefit to the overtaxed middle class. [But] I don’t see it delivering much to the poor in society.”

FRC is optimistic about another educational policy that the President supports: Educational savings accounts that would allow parents to set aside money for their child’s education from kindergarten through 12th grade.

Withdrawals and interest on the savings accounts would be tax free for up to $5,000 a year, according to Bush’s plan. The past two sessions of Congress have approved educational savings account proposals with $2,000 limits. But former President Clinton vetoed both bills.

“It’s received bipartisan support in the past,” Lestelle said. “I think this is the year.”

Representatives also hope to increase other federal spending for elementary and secondary schools. House Democrats and Republicans have tentatively agreed to a 22.5 percent increase in funding for elementary and secondary schools. The President, however, says more than money is needed to prompt changes in schools.

While Melton agrees that more funding is important, the Alabama teacher says that money is not a cure-all. She supports better training and mentoring for teachers, and she believes that the best changes occur at local levels.

“When you get so far removed as Washington, D.C., there’s no way they can make a great education plan for every state,” she says. “That’s impossible.”

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

Other articles about Bush’s education plan include:

GOP pushes budget through house — Associated Press (May 9, 2001)

Senate allocates $6 billion to train teachers in poor areasLos Angeles Times (May 9, 2001)

Budget vote may hang on educationThe Boston Globe (May 9, 2001)

Senate expands Bush plan to protect teachers — Reuters (May 9, 2001)

House education bill got it wrong for some critics on the rightThe Washington Post (May 6, 2001)

Bush education plan facing major changes on hillThe Washington Post (May 6, 2001)

Bush’s education reform advancesChicago Tribune (May 4, 2001)

Education bill passes key test — Associated Press (May 4, 2001)

On way to passage, Bush’s education plan gets a makeoverThe New York Times (May 4, 2001)

Revised education bill is unveiledLos Angeles Times (May 4, 2001)

House panel votes to kill private school vouchersThe Washington Post (May 3, 2001)

See more updates in Yahoo’s full coverage areas on the 2002 budget, Education Curriculum and Policy, and School Choice and Tuition Vouchers.

More Christianity Today articles on school reforms are available in our education area.

Also in this issue

Solitary Refinement: Evangelical assumptions about singleness still need rethinking.

Cover Story

Solitary Refinement

Schools: School Fights Christian Athletes Club

Quotations to Stir Mind and Heart

Conservation: Protecting Bald Eagles and Babies

Sudan: No Greater Tragedy

Resisting Relevancy

Significance in a Small Package

Resisting Church Divorce

Merchants of Cool

Health Fraud: Health Ministry in Receiership

Investor Fury: Elderly Investors Target Accountant

Briefs: North America

Wild Child: How Bad Is Child Care for Kids?

Few to Receive AIDS Medicines

Flying Unfriendly Skies

Briefs: The World

Malaysia: Muslim Leader Appeals to Evangelicals

Nigeria: Teens 'Rescued' from Muslim Marriages

Ecumenism: Pope Apologizes

Does God Know Your Next Move?

Does God Know Your Next Move?

Does God Know Your Next Move?

Does God Know Your Next Move?

Does God Know Your Next Move?

Counteroffensive on RU-486

Wire Story

Indictments: Indictments Handed Down

Wire Story

Rainbow Ministry: Summit Equips Leaders for Ethnic Outreach

Wire Story

Islam Muslims Report Steady Growth

Review

Three Chords and the Truth

The Man Who Ignited the Debate

A Singular Mission Field

Surf Here Often?

Kissing Nonsense Goodbye

Does God Know Your Next Move?

Where Do We Go from Here?

Wire Story

Presbyterians Launch ’Confessing Movement’

Bush's Prolife Strategy Questioned

Basic Buddhism

Weighed Down by Karmic Debt

Blood and Tears in Tibet

Hollywood's Idol

Mind Over Skepticism

The Genesis of Our Woes

Revisiting Mt. Carmel

Putting Faith Back in Public Service

Straight Outta Dharamsala

Letters

View issue

Our Latest

The Russell Moore Show

Civility, Calvinism, and the Coming Judgment Day

Richard Mouw still believes in Christian “uncommon decency.” 

Paul’s Prescription for a Polarized Church

The apostle’s ethic of welcome challenges our personal, social, and political instincts.

Spain’s Oldest Protestant Publishing House Began Underground 100 Years Ago

Now Clie celebrates a century of equipping the church through dictatorship and secularization. 

News

Donald Trump Takes the White House Again

In his late-night victory speech, the former president says God gave him a mission to “save our country.”

News

Florida’s Abortion Amendment Becomes the First to Fail Since Roe’s Reversal

On election night, pro-lifers cheered the news that a 6-week ban enacted under Gov. Ron DeSantis will get to stay, with further wins coming in South Dakota and Nebraska.

News

Conservative Anglicans Call for Archbishop to Repent Over Same-Sex Relationships Stance

As the issue continues to divide the Church of England, Justin Welby spoke on a popular podcast about how his views have “evolved.”

In a Polarized World, but Not of It 

On Election Day and beyond, conservative and liberal Christians can better understand each other and be ministers of reconciliation. 

Go Slow and Repair Things

We’re facing huge problems in our culture—problems an election alone can’t solve. But by God’s grace, we can do the small, daily work of repair.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube