Pastors

Pastoral Care for Bruised Reeds and Smoldering Wicks

Paul shows us how to restore worth to the wounded and weary.

Illustration by Rick Szuecs | Source images: David Suarez / Unsplash | Wikimedia Commons

“I wish I could be more like Epaphroditus.”

That was the sentiment of one group member after our Zoom discussion of Philippians 2. Epaphroditus makes a big impression in spite of only brief references (2:25–30 and 4:18). Paul describes him in glowing terms as “my brother, co-worker and fellow soldier, who is also your messenger, whom you sent to take care of my needs” (2:25). In light of Paul’s words, my friend felt inferior by comparison.

But when we read the whole story of Epaphroditus more slowly, a rather different, more human picture emerges. The church in Philippi had sent Epaphroditus to deliver a financial gift and assist Paul while he was in prison. But after Epaphroditus arrived, his health deteriorated rapidly. We aren’t told what his illness was, but he nearly died from it. In his convalescence, Epaphroditus grew extremely homesick. Knowing everyone back in Philippi was worried about his condition only added to his distress.

The stress Epaphroditus was experiencing in turn created undue stress for Paul. The helper who’d been sent now needed help. Paul told the Philippians he’d “have less anxiety” (v. 28) if he sent Epaphroditus back.

So Epaphroditus’s mission trip was cut short prematurely. While Epaphroditus was probably relieved to be heading home, that relief would likely have been tempered by feelings of trepidation. Would people judge him for being weak? Would they be disappointed or let down?

If I were in Epaphroditus’s place, I know the voices in my head would be full of accusation. I’d compare my lack of stamina to Paul’s seemingly endless supply of endurance. Even if no one else thought less of me, I’d be battling my own feelings of failure and shame over having washed out without completing the work. Epaphroditus was returning to Philippi with ample reasons for insecurity, discouragement, and self-doubt.

Paul’s Pastoral Care

What a gift Paul gave Epaphroditus in his letter to the Philippians! Epaphroditus held in his hands concrete words of affirmation from Paul to counter whatever lies might have been spinning in his head. And as Epaphroditus reengaged with the community that sent him out, Paul paved the way for him to be received with honor and dignity rather than criticism and judgment.

This letter likely changed the trajectory of Epaphroditus’s future. The fact that even casual readers in a Zoom call today hold him in such high regard says more about Paul’s care for him than about Epaphroditus himself. Paul restored worth to someone who could easily have been written off for not pulling his weight. The way in which Paul went about doing so provides an excellent model for pastoral care.

Paul Let Epaphroditus Live Within His Limits

Earlier in Philippians 2, Paul praised Jesus’ humility, describing how Christ voluntarily set aside all that he could have clung to as divine privilege, choosing instead to live within the limits of a human existence (2:6–8).

In contrast, we often press against limitations. We want to know more than we do; we want greater control than we have; we believe we have more capacity and power than is actually the case. The truth is we all have limits. Sometimes those are mental or emotional. Sometimes they’re financial. And sometimes they are physical. Epaphroditus found that his body couldn’t take it. The strain was too much. His mind and emotions had also hit a wall. He was no longer functioning well.

At that point, it could have been tempting for Paul as a pastor to step into exhortation mode. Here was a disciple ripe for a lesson about pressing on and enduring hardship. But Paul didn't spiritualize or play the guilt card. Rather than finding fault, he looked at the reality of this man’s condition and told him, “I think that’s enough.”

We err when we assume everyone else’s limitations should be the same as our own. Consider the pioneer missionary William Carey who is celebrated for writing, “I can plod. I can persevere in any defined pursuit. To this I owe everything.” And Carey could; he had tremendous capacity and accomplished amazing things after long years of persistence. But Carey never came to grips with the reality that his family didn’t share his rugged endurance. Tragically, several of his children died during those years, and his wife suffered a mental breakdown.

Paul knew others weren’t in the same position he was. He didn’t expect everyone to remain unmarried like he had. He didn’t ask everyone to become an itinerant preacher, suffering the same brutal treatment he did. Paul saw Epaphroditus for who he was and gave him full permission to live within his God-given limits.

One reason Paul could do this is because he knew our limits are gifts and not sins. So often we see limits as obstacles standing in the way of us and our dreams and goals. But Paul’s own experience with the thorn taught him that perceived weaknesses and limits are the very places where God’s strength becomes most readily available (2 Cor. 12:7–10). As pastors, when we give others the freedom to accept their own limits rather than insisting they overcome them, we make room for them to pay attention to where God is at work.

Paul Restored Worth by Sharing Status

In all of Scripture, there’s really no one quite like Paul. He had a lengthy religious pedigree (Phil. 3:4–6). If that weren’t enough, over the years he accumulated an incomparable curriculum vitae of hardships that included imprisonment, persecution, beatings, starvation, and shipwreck (2 Cor. 11).

Epaphroditus, on the other hand, was a relatively new Gentile convert with limited Bible knowledge. The extent of his “enduring hardship” was getting physically sick (albeit severely) and missing home. To our knowledge, Epaphroditus received no threats for his faith and suffered no overtly spiritual attacks. He simply experienced the kinds of challenges that generally go along with being human.

Yet Paul treated Epaphroditus’s illness as an equally valid form of suffering for Christ (Phil. 2:30). He did not judge it as less worthy for being merely physical. When he called Epaphroditus “my brother, co-worker and fellow soldier” (v. 25), he elevated Epaphroditus’s standing to that of a peer.

Maya Angelou once said that only equals can be friends. Paul modeled that concept beautifully here. Apart from surviving a harrowing illness, Epaphroditus hadn’t really done anything that would rank him anywhere near Paul in our minds. It was Paul who chose to see him as an equal, and he did so when such grace was least deserved and most needed.

It is easy to assign greater or lesser status to people based on their accomplishments, education, wealth, or influence—and we often do this unknowingly. We may find ourselves enamored with congregation members who seem to have the most to contribute (either in finances or talent), gravitating toward the Sauls who impress us with their stature while passing over the Davids. But Paul’s example here reminds us that, as human beings, we are all bearers of the imago Dei and, at the same time, we are all equally in need of the Cross. Staying grounded in the core reality where we share status gives us better footing for building true relationships and pastoring well.

Paul Honored the Person Above the Failure

As Epaphroditus headed home with this letter, Paul kept the spotlight on the honorable aspects of Epaphroditus’s ministry rather than rehashing the obvious shortcomings of the curtailed mission trip.

I find that I can be quite good at honoring failure. I hang on to the painful memories of my own mistakes. I might say I forgive someone yet continue to view him through the lens of how he let me down.

I’m struck by a story about Clara Barton, the founder of the American Red Cross, who faced many challenges and detractors in establishing the organization. A colleague once reminded her of how another person had attacked her years earlier. Clara had no recollection of the incident, which mystified her friend. When pressed, Clara said, “I distinctly remember forgetting that.”

In Philippians, we can see that Paul did not dwell on any physical and emotional weakness others might fault Epaphroditus for displaying. And because Paul decided to view Epaphroditus as a person of great worth, it impacted the way Epaphroditus was received by the Philippian church.

What Paul did for Epaphroditus embodies what Christ has done for each of us—Jesus, our Savior who does not break a bruised reed or snuff out a smoldering wick (Isa. 42:3). It is because Jesus chose to assign worth to us that we are welcomed with glory by the Father.

Jesus allows us to live within our limits because he “knows how we are formed” and “remembers that we are dust” (Ps. 103:14). He too shared status with us, joining us in our lowly condition and elevating us to a new place, going so far as to call us his friends (John 15:15). And while he would have ample reason to remind us of all we’ve done wrong, he chooses instead to honor us above our failures, never treating us as our sins deserve (Ps. 103:10).

Too often, I find myself overly burdened by a sense of pastoral duty to offer a corrective admonishment, to point out error in defense of truth. That goes with the job—but it is not the only priority, nor is it the highest. The most powerful way we represent the Good Shepherd to others is through the grace we offer when they are at their most vulnerable.

The truth is, each of us is Epaphroditus, all too aware of our own weaknesses, failures, and shame. And each of us has the opportunity to be like Paul in the way we treat one another with great care.

As pastors, can we lean into a love that covers over a multitude of sins? Can we worry less about ensuring people learn from their mistakes and spend more time reminding them of their great worth to God? That is nothing short of living out the gospel. And it just might change the trajectory for those questioning their significance in the kingdom.

Jeff Peabody is a writer and lead pastor of New Day Church in Tacoma, Washington.

Pastors

When We Don’t Care Enough to Care

As we love and comfort others, the Comforter gives strength for our weariness (and wariness too).

Illustration by Rick Szuecs | Source image: Swetta / Getty / Tima Miroshnichenko / Pexels

I visited a beloved member of my church at her assisted-living residence. She’d had a stroke, and while it did nothing to hamper her vivacity, she suffered a dent to her memory. I found her in the cafeteria having lunch with other residents. She happily recognized me as someone familiar when I showed up, but she struggled to recall my name.

The resident seated next to her inquired whether I was her grandson. She responded not as she intended but in a way that surprised both me and her table companion. A huge grin on her face and a gleam in her eye, she excitedly announced while pointing at me, “This is the Lord!” Naturally, the other resident, a bit taken aback, gave me a good looking over before exuding simultaneous disbelief and disdain. My friend gathered as much, so she repeated her introduction with gusto: “This is the Lord!”

At first I was too startled and amused to correct her, but regaining my composure, I quickly admitted that no, I actually wasn’t the Lord but only a minister from her church. My admission failed to wipe the disdain from the other resident’s face. Apparently I was as unimpressive as a pastor as I had been as the Lord. She returned to her tapioca, quite underwhelmed.

While pastoral care can coax out the messiah complex in us, it can also create irritation. Pastoral care often comes as a disruption. The phone predictably dings in those moments when we feel least available, with sermons to prepare, Bible studies to lead, staff to coach, programs to organize, and emails to answer. Must I stop all that needs doing to go to the hospital to pray? Can I not intercede from my desk? (I feel guilty even typing this.)

I’m reminded of a pastor of a large church who quipped that if he ever showed up in a hospital room, then the person he visited must be seriously sick. On the other hand, I interned with a pastor who visited the sick every afternoon. For him, this priority derived from Jesus’ identification with the infirm (Matt. 25:36). In those days, hospitals kept lists of which patients attended which churches, making it possible for pastors to show up unannounced to the wonder of their ill congregants. (Nothing impresses folks like a hint of omniscience!)

Care is a cornerstone of our calling. So why must we be cajoled to do it? It could be because pastoral care requires spiritual muscles we don’t flex as often. The majority of our work tends in other directions, leaving pastoral care to operate as something of a sidecar to what seems like more important ministry. Larger churches will relegate care to associate staff, and smaller churches to hospital chaplains, hospice services, and other agencies. Realizing as much, our congregants resort to these services, as well as to therapists, counselors, and a host of DIY self-care methods, so as not to bother the pastor.

There’s also an aversion, endemic to healthy humans, to inhabiting the world of the sick, the hurting, and the dying. We pastors may preach death as the pathway to resurrection, but we’d rather spend time among the living than the dying.

Ministers have long been tasked with the care of souls, a calling that must include—even as it finally surpasses—sick bodies. The ill people Jesus healed all went on to die. In this way, healing pointed to heaven; it wasn’t yet heaven itself. Our church prayer requests are packed with those suffering physical distress, but we must pray and attend to spiritual ailments too.

Not that all hardship will find healing. Jesus was clear that following him would bring trouble. We must each carry our own cross and experience suffering as a kind of awful grace from God. As Lutheran pastor Harold L. Senkbeil reminds us in The Care of Souls, “We have nothing to give to others that we ourselves have not first received.”

This includes taking care of ourselves since pastors—even those with messiah complexes—can no more pull off omnipotence than we can pretend to be omniscient. We need to set aside time to read Scripture and pray, to make friends and lean on support systems, to take our vacations and pace ourselves, and to rehearse over and over the words of John the Baptist, “I am not the Messiah” (John 1:20).

Self-care includes boundaries. We forget in these days of clergy scandal and institutional mistrust that people still put their pastors on pedestals, and pedestals grow higher sometimes due to the disappointment elsewhere. Boundaries protect pastors from misplaced hero worship. And boundaries protect our people from our own temptations toward heroics.

As pastoral caregivers, we do so as sinners in need of the same grace. We are not the Lord, but we have access to his Spirit—the ultimate Comforter who will help and be with us forever.

Daniel Harrell recently served as CT's editor in chief and has ministered as a pastor for over three decades.

Pastors

Racial Reconciliation Requires a Painful Level of Self-Awareness

To participate in the work of justice, we pastors need to grow and change.

Julio Reynaldo / Amir Babaei / Steward Masweneng / Unsplash

One month after our church’s annual Gospel and Race conference two years ago, a small group of black congregants asked for a private meeting with me. I thought the conference was a success, so I wondered what the meeting could be about. For the conference, we brought in top-notch thinkers and leaders from the outside, but it was evident to some in our church that we still had lots of work to do on the inside.

For three decades, our multiethnic congregation has worked extremely hard to bridge racial barriers. We address racial injustice, encourage relationships across ethnic differences, and seek to model something of the kingdom of God. But even with this history, there remain blind spots.

In the days preceding the meeting, I heard words of frustration from some of the people who were planning on attending, so I was already on guard. When the time came, I walked in and greeted the ten congregants who were patiently waiting for our meeting to begin. I did my pastoral thing, greeting everyone around the table. There were genuine smiles, hugs, and handshakes exchanged, yet I sensed some tension in the room. I had a piece of paper handy so I could take notes and a cup of water to hide behind in the event that things got too tense.

It didn’t take long for the points of tension to be expressed. Each person took a turn first affirming the work we’ve done over the years and then proceeding to share frustrations. The things I heard made my heart sink: “Pastor, I feel invisible.” “I don’t know if I belong here.” “I wonder when things will change.” “When will we get equal treatment here?” “We’ve made progress, Pastor Rich, but we have a long way to go.”

There was some hard truth in their observations. As I listened, I captured the comments on paper, which gave me a bit of emotional distance from the surprising and disorienting words I hadn’t expected. I’d worked hard to preach and lead from a place of racial justice and reconciliation. How could this be?

This meeting led to additional good conversations which helped pinpoint particular areas that needed to be discerned (such as whether we needed more ethnic-specific communities within our church), and it served as a good reminder that the work of racial healing is deep. Our leadership team agreed that we were not equipping leaders at our church well enough to promote our core value of reconciliation, so we decided to gather together key leaders to dialogue, train, and deepen our commitment to racial wholeness. For us as a church, the journey continues.

And for me, as a pastor, the journey continues as well. As I grappled with my own reactions of frustration and bewilderment during that initial meeting, it became clear to me that my parishioners needed more than a defensive reaction from me as their pastor. To participate in the deep work of racial healing, I also needed to grow and change.

We all have racial habits. We all have conscious and unconscious ways of racially engaging others. Some habits are rooted in love, justice, and appreciation for others’ differences; other habits are rooted in ignorance, fear, and a propensity to marginalize whoever is different. But the good news is that bad habits can be changed. For old habits to die, we need a new set of habits in their places. Here are some of the habits God continues to form in me as I seek to pastor with a commitment to racial healing and justice.

Racial Self-Examination

One of the ways we dishonor the image of God in others is by not doing the hard work of examining the assumptions and biases we have against them. We have all been socialized by our families of origin and surrounding culture to see people in particular ways. We often live our lives without ever reflecting on the stories and lies we’ve been told about certain groups of people. Consequently, we perpetuate the myths and stereotypes subconsciously. Racial reconciliation requires us to develop a deep level of self-awareness.

I remember sitting in a library in Queens and working on a sermon. While deep in thought, I glanced to the left and saw a black man slowly looking around the library. My initial thought was What is he looking for? The question very quickly became an assumption and morphed into a judgment: He’s looking to steal something. But I discovered—to my shame—that the man was looking for a place to charge his phone. I’d gone from observing to interpreting to judging, all in a split second. Something deep was at work within me.

Implicit racial prejudice infects all of us—even us pastors. Rather than passively acquiesce to it, we can combat it through the spiritual habit of racial self-examination, regularly and honestly wrestling with questions like “Is there a particular people, ethnicity, or race that I don’t trust? Why?” or “What types of people cause me to cross the street if I am walking alone?” As we honestly respond to questions such as these and identify the ways we’ve been deeply de-formed in our thinking toward others, we position ourselves to walk in greater freedom.

Nondefensive Listening

When it comes to conversations on race, our level of offendability often reveals the level of our maturity. If we can’t overcome offense in the moment, we are not going to get very far. If we react defensively or try to justify ourselves or our ministry efforts, we aren’t able to pastor well. Reconciliation requires us to listen deeply to one another.

Most of us can admit that we can do better at listening, yet this remains virtually impossible for many reasons. For example, we equate listening to agreement, we would rather be right than open our minds to different perspectives, we might carry deep anxiety about negotiating differences, we reduce people to their worst belief, or we are simply afraid of change. When I look at my life, I can see these perspectives flowing through me. As a result, listening is hard. To truly listen to another person requires something of a crucifixion. I must undergo a painful process of leaving what is familiar territory (my perspective on the matter) and make space in my heart for a different narrative.

I’ve worked hard to remain curious with people who come from different backgrounds, seeking to ask more questions than to give prepackaged answers. More than anything, I’m learning to monitor my own triggers and defensiveness when I’m in conversation with congregants who can’t—or even refuse to—see the perspectives I offer. This is hard and holy work.

Regular Repentance

Reconciliation requires regular confession, repentance, and forgiveness. When we gather as a church, we come together as deeply broken and frail people. We sin against God, and we sin against each other. We are all complicit—myself included. Croatian theologian Miroslav Volf has said, “Forgiveness flounders because I exclude the enemy from the community of humans even as I exclude myself from the community of sinners.” Christians—and especially pastors—are called to the deeply formed ways of confession, repentance, and forgiveness.

Racial reconciliation requires us to open ourselves to the truth that things we hate in others we also find in ourselves. In confession and repentance, we see that we have disappointed people, dominated and used others to their harm, rarely if ever given away power unless forced to, said harsh things, not followed through on a promise, gossiped, lied, been insensitive, and been unforgiving. We have confessed to being followers of Jesus without becoming truly shaped by the values he lived and died for. For me, repentance has often meant turning back to people I would rather give up on because of my own frustration. I believe repentance is not just a return to God but often a return to people we have difficulty loving. As pastors, this is the kind of work we cannot avoid.

In this moment, the church desperately needs courageous and compassionate pastors to respond to the injustice and toxicity we see around matters of race. Our congregations need models of love, maturity, humility, and truth telling to navigate the complexity that surrounds this issue. And I believe God longs to empower us for this task.

Rich Villodas is the Brooklyn-born lead pastor of New Life Fellowship, a large, multiracial church representing more than 75 countries in Elmhurst, Queens. This article is an adapted excerpt from The Deeply Formed Life: Five Transformative Values to Root Us in the Way of Jesus. Copyright © 2020 by Rich Villodas. Used by permission of WaterBrook, an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC.

Pastors

God Meets Me in My Daily Run

What used to feel like a duty has now become my lifeline.

Illustration by Rick Szuecs / Source Image: Roberto Westbrook / Getty

I don’t know if it’s because I am of Japanese descent or because I am a pastor—or both—but my life has been largely driven by a sense of duty. For many years, my prayer life also felt dutiful.

As I prayed through lists of people and specific requests, I would often find myself checking my watch to see if I had clocked my time. Rather than talking with God or listening for his voice, I was essentially talking at God. Those times of prayer often felt burdensome and wearying.

Over the years, my prayer habits have gradually changed. I’ve come to see prayer as a chance to enjoy God’s company. Now my time with the Lord is my favorite part of the day—a time I approach with anticipation.

During this past year of COVID-19, like many pastors, I have woken up some mornings feeling melancholy, at times with a twinge of depression. The weight of pastoral responsibility has pressed more heavily on my shoulders. I’ve worried about a young mother in our congregation who was on a ventilator, fighting for her life. I’ve worried about church members who’ve lost their jobs. I’ve worried about the financial trajectory of our church during this prolonged pandemic.

In this difficult season of isolation, discouraging news, and weighty ministry concerns, my time with the Lord feels like a lifeline. Rather than a duty or obligation, daily I’m discovering that prayer opens an ideal space to experience gratitude and joy in God’s presence.

Each morning, I roll out of bed and leash our dog, Sasha, and while it is still dark, we go for a leisurely run through our neighborhood. While running, I mentally scan the past 24 hours, looking for some of its gifts: a good night’s sleep. A delicious dinner the evening before. A swim at our local pool. A meaningful conversation. As I identify the things I am thankful for, slowly I begin to feel more grateful. I know that as I savor something good in my mind, my brain releases dopamine and serotonin, elevating my mood, but as I trace these gifts to their ultimate source, I also feel more gratitude and joy in God.

I am learning that prayer is the best context to receive and savor God’s love. A few years ago, someone encouraged me to watch Won’t You Be My Neighbor?, a documentary about Fred Rogers. It has a scene in which Rogers, an ordained minister, delivers a university commencement address. He invites the graduating class to take one minute to imagine the face of someone who wants the best for them—someone who “loved you into loving.” (On a similar occasion, Rogers asks listeners to picture those “who have loved us into being.”) Rogers then tells his listeners, “You don’t ever have to do anything sensational for people to love you.” Inspired by those words, during my morning run, I bring to mind my wife, our son, my mom and dad (who died a few years ago), a mentor, and others who have loved me. People whose existence feels like a pure gift. People through whom I’ve experienced the love of God.

When I arrive home, I light a candle and sit in silence for a while, simply enjoying God’s presence. Thomas Keating emphasized that the goal of silent prayer is not perfect attention. If we are distracted 10,000 times, he taught, this represents 10,000 opportunities to return to the Lord. What is more important than attention is intention. With this in mind, I close my prayer with a few phrases of intention: “Help me to love you (God) well. Help me to love Sakiko (my wife) and Joey (our son) well and others I meet today.”

For pastors, this long pandemic season has brought many unique pressures and difficulties. My morning prayer rhythm doesn’t always make me feel on top of the world, but I almost always feel lighter and freer than I did before, filled with more of God’s love to offer others around me. I have more energy to make phone calls to people in our church, to see how they are faring in this crisis and to provide pastoral care. Not long ago, someone told me, “With all the responsibility you carry [as a pastor], I’m surprised you’re not more agitated. I really feel you are here in the room.” Time in prayer, focused on joy in God’s presence rather than duty, has helped me to be more present to the people in my life and ministry.

During my prayer times, I still occasionally look at my watch, but not out of a desire for time to move more quickly. Now it is with the hope that time will move more slowly as I savor the joy-evoking presence of God. In prayer, God imparts his love to me, enabling me to love and care for those I encounter throughout the day.

Ken Shigematsu is senior pastor of Tenth Church in Vancouver, British Columbia. He is the author of Survival Guide for the Soul and God in My Everything.

How Prayer Can Prepare Us For Death

The author of Rabbit Room’s “Every Moment Holy” liturgies on what he has learned about grief and hope in 2020.

Christianity Today March 12, 2021
Photo by House on a Hill Photography

Douglas McKelvey has been writing short prayers for years. Formerly a lyricist for artist Charlie Peacock and other Christian bands, McKelvey was also involved in the early work of Art House America, a self-described “artistic hub” and nonprofit founded by Peacock and led by Christian creatives such as Sara Groves.

In 2017, McKelvey published a book of daily liturgies called Every Moment Holy, Vol. 1 through a creative collective called Rabbit Room founded by singer-songwriter Andrew Peterson. McKelvey’s recently published second volume is filled with liturgies for grief, death, and dying, released 12 months after the coronavirus pandemic swept the United States and killed hundreds of thousands. CT interviewed McKelvey about how his latest volume and the past year’s events shaped his beliefs on death and dying.

What was your inspiration for Every Moment Holy?

I was working on a science fiction novel but kind of felt like I was spinning my wheels. A lot of days I just wasn’t making any progress. And at a certain point, I thought, I really need a prayer that I could pray when I sit down in the morning to work—to write something that would reorient me in terms of my relationship to my Creator and my relationship to my craft and whatever gifts I’m a steward of. So, I wrote this prayer and called it a liturgy for fiction writers.

Douglas McKelveyPhoto by Lancia E. Smith
Douglas McKelvey

That was a couple of months before a conference where I was speaking with Andrew Peterson and author Heidi Johnston. I emailed that prayer for fiction writers to Andrew, and he responded pretty quickly and said, “Hey, this is great, but man, I wish I had a liturgy for beekeeping” and a couple of other things.

That was the immediate moment where the lightbulb just turned on and I realized there’s actually something here that might really be of service to the body of Christ—to create a collection of prayers that that would help people to unpack moment by moment in their lives what it might mean that God is present and active in this moment. It’s his pleasure to work in and through us as our hearts are yielded to that process moment by moment. To look at different moments of our lives in light of Scripture and say, okay, if we’re changing a diaper, how does that touch on eternity? How is that tied to the advancing kingdom of God, to the coming new creation?

What would you say is the value specifically in the Every Moment Holy liturgies?

I find that it is helpful to define terms because people can mean very different things when they use the word liturgy because there is the overarching meaning of the word, which is just the order and content of a worship service. Then there’s the sense of the word that means those rhythms of our lives, those repeated practices that have the power to shape our hearts into something that better reflects the image of Christ or to misshape them away from that. So there are negative liturgies as well as positive liturgies.

An example that I’ve used before is that, if I am habitually posting dozens of selfies every day, there’s nothing in and of itself that’s inherently wrong with posting selfies. But if that becomes this repeated rhythm in my life, then it’s likely that it could begin to shape me, to shape my heart, or misshape my heart toward caring an awful lot about what other people think of me.

And that could be an overriding and consuming and shaping factor in my life as opposed to if I have the regular practice of taking walks in the woods and taking time to pause and consider the creation and the beauty that God has created there. Well, there’s nothing that is inherently righteous about taking a walk in the woods, but that practice is going to be much more likely to draw my heart to the beauty of my Creator.

With the Every Moment Holy project, my hope has been that these will be liturgical in the sense that individuals or families or small groups or churches would be able to find a number of the prayers in these books that they could incorporate naturally into the rhythm of their lives. There’s a liturgy for the first hearth fire of the season, or if a family incorporates the daily meal prayers and liturgies, that the theological truths that are contained in those would be things that over time would shape and frame the thinking and theology for children and adults.

The second volume is coming out during Lent and after a really hard year that reminded us of our mortality in a lot of ways.

Yeah, it took two years to write volume two. It predated COVID. Through most of 2020, I was continuing to write, and the events that were happening were continuing to shape the content of it. I think one of those was a liturgy for a time of widespread suffering. Even more than current events shaping these there was the absolutely necessary involvement of probably at least 150 people that I corresponded with during that time who either were navigating grief or were facing their own mortality during that season.

For the believer, hope is that is the common theme that runs through all of the death, the dying, the suffering and the grief.

There was a woman who had just lost her husband and her seven- and nine-year-old daughters. A mutual acquaintance contacted me to ask if I had anything that might be appropriate for the memorial service. So I sent them a couple of things, and then this woman contacted me within the next couple of weeks to thank me for that. And then we just began this correspondence where she would look at prayers I had written and would give me her honest feedback on what was accurately articulating what was on her heart and what I might be missing on some of those things or things I was completely clueless to. There were a number of heavier topics that it was just so crucial to have this community of grieving people weighing in and ultimately signing off.

Based on the dedication to Jay Swartzendruber, it sounds like you also had some personal experience with grief this year.

Well, yeah, Jay has been a friend for many years. The afternoon that I was finishing the final edits on this book, I got a phone call from another friend giving me the news that Jay had just died unexpectedly earlier that day. So for the next couple of hours, I continued to work on the manuscript, but it was through tears. But it was also with such an assurance of the reality of the things I had just spent two years writing about. And knowing that it was okay to live in that tension of feeling great grief, but also having a real sense of celebration and hope at the same time. And those things don’t contradict each other for a follower of Christ. Those things are completely interwoven and intermingled, and we should allow ourselves to feel both fully at the same time.

That’s powerful. Do you have a specific liturgy in volume 2 that is most meaningful to you?

Yeah. In volume 1 the book closes with the liturgy of praise to the King of creation. It’s this exuberant worshipful song of a prayer just praising Christ. The final prayer [in volume 2] is a liturgy of praise to Christ who conquered death. I think that’s become one of the most meaningful ones for me. I was saving it for the end because I recognized it as something that I needed after having spent two years wrestling through these topics of death and mortality and grieving.

I wanted to end the experience of writing the book with letting all of that be summed up in an expression of the great hope that we have and turn all of that into worship of Christ. Because he is the one who has conquered death, who has given us this hope that is so powerful that it undercuts, transcends, and ultimately transforms our dying and the grief that we do encounter in this life. That’s one that definitely comes to mind as a contender for the one that’s most meaningful to me.

There’s a prayer in the new book giving voice to the costly confession. When everything is going well for us, it doesn’t really ask much of us to give thanks to God or to declare his worthiness. But in those times when life is a struggle or in the most extreme scenario when we are facing our own imminent death, what does it mean at that point to say to God, “Even so, you are worthy of all glory, all praise whether I live or die”? The collective suffering that we’ve experienced over the last year does put us in a place where it’s more sobering and it’s more costly to make those kinds of declarations.

Speaking of formation, how has your view on death and dying grief been formed? And what is your hope for this specific volume coming out in 2021?

The answer to both of those questions is probably the same answer. I did a lot of reading of books written by people chronicling their own grief process or theological works about death and dying and grief. I began to realize through all of that was that the church, at least in the West, no longer has a robust theology of dying based on Scripture. And there are a number of reasons for that. One of them, I think, has to do with medical advances and the fact that we no longer find ourselves in a time and place when most of us have experienced a number of deaths firsthand growing up.

So often our experiences around death and grief are awkward because we’re not prepared. We don’t know how to really serve those who are dying. We don’t know how to mourn with those who are mourning. And we don’t know how to navigate our own dying when each of us reaches that season. Part of my hope for what volume 2 might do—in addition to serving individuals who are walking through these seasons—is to be a catalyst for churches to begin to have these conversations and to develop a more robust theology of dying.

Part of what I think we’ve lost is an understanding of how we are crucified with Christ. At the moment we begin the journey as followers of Jesus, we are learning to die to ourselves. We’re baptized into his death. Baptism is the symbol of us who we were dying, of laying down our own desires. And then as we follow him throughout the rest of our lives, it’s this ongoing process of sanctification, of becoming more and more like him. So much of that has to do with continuing to lay down our own dreams, our own desires.

Our last crossing of the valley of the shadow of death is an expected and final part of that journey. It’s the point where we at last will willingly or unwillingly lay down all of those final things that we’ve still been carrying and fully embrace the life that we have in him. That’s not to say that death is not unnatural and an enemy. Scripture tells us that it’s the last enemy that will be destroyed, but it will be destroyed. And that’s great cause for rejoicing. That’s one element of that theology of dying that I hope that the church in the West can reclaim in a more holistic way that’s not just relegated to a funeral service.

For the believer, hope is that is the common theme that runs through all of the death, the dying, the suffering and the grief. And of those three—death, grief, and hope—hope is the only one that is eternal. Its fulfillment is eternal.

Theology

Pandemic and Penitence: COVID-19 Has Re-Ordered What Matters Most

This Lent to forget will make us remember where our first loves reside.

Christianity Today March 12, 2021

Depending on your perspective, Lenten fasts can seem trivial. What’s the point, exactly, of giving up dessert or alcohol for six weeks? (Is your real goal to lose weight?) Forgoing Facebook or Twitter for Lent may seem worthwhile—but if you return after Easter, what is the lasting impact? Besides, aren’t these fasts supposed to be spiritual disciplines? How do they honor God?

Proponents of the liturgical year point out that there are other ways to mark the Lenten season. Christians can “add in” disciplines as easily as they can take them out. The traditional Lenten disciplines of prayer, fasting, and almsgiving rightly orient our relationship to God (in prayer), ourselves (through fasting), and our neighbor (by serving the poor). While such disciplines should hardly be reserved solely for Lent, the season’s self-denial invites a period of focused self-examination, a chance to, in some small ways, restructure our daily routines.

Normally, Lenten disciplines come with a time stamp. We count down the approximately 40 days from Ash Wednesday to Easter knowing that, surely, we can grit our teeth and bear going without caffeine or Instagram for six weeks.

The pandemic feels like a never-ending penitential season, with forced fasting, imposed self-denial, and plenty of unanswered prayers.

The pandemic, however, feels like a never-ending penitential season, with forced fasting, imposed self-denial, and plenty of unanswered prayers. We’ve had to give up meeting together as believers in person, we’ve given up the easy fellowship of a lunch with friends, or coffee with coworkers, or date-night dinners out. Many have had to tighten their belts because of a job loss. At-risk individuals have forgone almost all physical contact in order to stay safe. We’ve waited in line to get into stores and gone online for everything else. The hope offered by vaccines has been tempered by concern over new viral strains and a growing awareness that COVID-19 will stay with us, like the seasonal flu.

So what are we to do with the interminable Lent that is this pandemic? It may be advisable to renounce our traditional renouncing this year, instead devoting this Lent to self-examination. The things whose loss we mourn—hugs and shared meals, going to school, easy trips to get groceries—are all good things (indeed, their goodness is even more apparent now that we’ve experienced their absence). What does our longing for their return reveal about our attachment to them?

A few days into Lent, I often wonder whether anyone cares if I skip lunch or eschew coffee. No one else is affected by my choice, and unless I confess, no one will know if I cheated. More pressing is the sense that these mundane decisions make no difference to my spiritual well-being. It is likely a sign of my implicit dualism that I so easily regard the physical disciplines of Lent as less meaningful (to myself or to God) than more recognizably “spiritual” practices.

But choosing to deny my fairly basic bodily desires, even for a few weeks, is part of a much greater discipline that all Christians must practice—the ordo caritatis, or “ordering one’s loves.” At its core, ordering our loves is simply the work of rooting out idolatry, of realizing where we give primacy of place to things other than God. Because of the imprecision around the word love in English (where I can say I love my husband and I love burritos in the same breath), I find desire to be a more useful term. By ordering our desires, we examine in a more a nuanced way what it is we want and how our habits may be impacting the health of our souls.

Embedded in the ordo caritatis is the idea that we desire many things that are good, and the desire for good things is not inherently sinful. Our desires become sin when we mis-order them; when we love the good gifts more than the Giver, or when our unexamined desires end up determining our decisions. Giving something up for Lent—whether it’s chocolate, or alcohol, or watching TV—does not deny the goodness of these things. But such Lenten fasts do require us to practice intentionality, to examine our habits, and to practice disciplining desires of all kinds. To choose what to give up or take on for Lent is to choose how to spend our time and attention, and to notice what desires we unthinkingly and regularly feed. Such self-reflection leads to making more intentional decisions (at least for six weeks!), rather than letting ourselves be governed by our habits.

Any love of good things—community, romance, stability, wealth, beauty, status, achievements of all kinds—can easily become a substitute for better things, namely deeper submission to the God “in whose service is perfect freedom,” (as the Book of Common Prayer puts it). Our desires easily intertwine; we eat or drink when we are lonely, or turn to fiction (whether on TV or in the pages of a book) as a way of escaping the difficult work of reality. The very physicality of Lenten disciplines—their connection to our bodies and to our habits, can be useful places to practice self-awareness and self-discipline. These fasts are not abstract exercises in self-reflection, but very real explorations of how much I value my nightly social media scroll, how incredibly difficult it might be to resist turning on the TV, or how grumpy I am when denied something I typically have on a daily basis.

In this ongoing pandemic, our losses have helped us to see our own needs more clearly.

In this ongoing pandemic, some of our losses have helped us to see our own needs more clearly. We’ve grown to cherish the importance of meeting together as the body of Christ. We understand intuitively that community mediated through a screen is not the same as being together in person. But with other losses (might we call them fasts this Lent?) we can see the ways we have mis-ordered our lives and routines, directing our desires toward unholy ends. We have desired our own security and comfort rather than trusting in the Lord. We have found our purpose in friendships, in to-do lists, and in busy days instead of in Christ’s love for us. We have sought instant gratification rather than the slow-growing fruit of the Spirit.

We can use this pandemic-driven Lent to examine our own desires in light of what we have lost. Remember that in Christ our losses become our gains (Luke 9:25; Phil. 3:7–8). All we have comes from the Lord. If some good gifts have been taken away in this season, what might our grief reveal about our mis-ordered desires? And can we find ways to practice gratitude for what remains?

Kerilyn Harkaway-Krieger is assistant professor of English and director of First-Year Writing at Gordon College, Wenham, MA.

News

How Luis Palau Shaped the Faith of Lee Strobel, Luis Bush, and Many More

12 evangelical leaders on what they’ll remember most about the mass evangelist.

Luis Palau

Luis Palau

Christianity Today March 11, 2021
Courtesy of Luis Palau Association

CT asked Christian leaders who knew Luis Palau, who died today at 86, about his theological impact on the evangelical world, what set him apart from his peers, and meaningful conversations they shared with the beloved evangelist:

Lee Strobel, apologetics author and speaker:

Luis Palau was my friend and hero. I marveled at his authenticity, his passion for the gospel, his fidelity to Scripture, and his warm and encouraging personality.

I recently interviewed him for a book I’m writing. We talked about heaven. Frankly, he was ready—even anxious—to get there. He actually gave me his handwritten preaching notes for a sermon he had written about heaven—a treasure I will always cherish.

But his main concern was to make sure the gospel was clearly articulated in my book. He wanted the focus to be on Jesus, not on himself. That was very much like the Luis I have known for decades.

Seize every opportunity, he would urge me, to tell others about the hope they can find in Christ. I loved that about Luis! In fact, I loved everything about Luis—and I long to reunite with him someday in heaven.

Luis Bush, missions strategist, originator of 10/40 Window movement:

Luis Palau reminded the evangelical world that at the core of what we believe is the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and life eternal. Luis elucidated the biblical truth that a committed Christian is called to share the gospel of Jesus Christ. He shared the conviction that “the heart of the king is in the hand of the Lord. Like rivers of water, he moves it whichever way he wishes” (Prov. 21:1).

One meaningful conversation I had with Palau took place in 1977 while completing my Master of Theology at Dallas Theological Seminary. He invited me to join him on his Welsh Crusade to reach out to rugby friends from my past school days in Great Britain. I took time out from my studies to visit with several old schoolboy friends. One of them, who had been the Welsh national under-18 rugby team captain, received Christ.

To God be the glory for the life and ministry of Luis Palau.

Franklin Graham, president and CEO of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association and Samaritan’s Purse:

Luis was a passionate evangelist who faithfully preached the gospel of Jesus Christ: his birth, his sacrificial death on the cross, his burial, and his resurrection. Millions have heard this truth, and untold men and women have trusted Christ, as a result of Luis Palau’s ministry. I thank God for his life and the example he set.

Luis was a close friend of my father Billy Graham throughout the years, and he was my friend as well. His voice will be greatly missed, but his life should inspire each of us to focus even more intensely on warning people of the consequences of dying without repenting of their sins and turning to Christ in faith.

Norberto Saracco, director of Facultad Internacional de Educacion Teologica, Buenos Aires, Argentina:

A big part of Luis Palau’s legacy is unity. In 1977, Palau was invited to Buenos Aires by a group of church leaders. When Palau learned that the organizers had marginalized Pentecostals, Palau confronted them and preached from 1 John 3 where the writer reminds his readers that “Anyone who hates his brother is a murderer.” It was a harsh call to repentance.

In 1979, the organizers decided to have a similar event and reached out to Palau. While visiting nearby Uruguay, Palau asked for a meeting with Argentine pastors to respond to their invitation. There he told them, “I reject your invitation because you have not learned the lesson and you have once again left out the Pentecostals. I will never again have a campaign if the whole body of Christ is not there.”

The church in Argentina has a special debt of gratitude to Palau for his work to bring the church there together. For many years, the Luis Palau Association allowed its staff to make themselves available to the work of unity. To this day, the president of Argentina’s evangelical alliance (ACIERA) shares his ministry with the Luis Palau Association, where he is also its director of festivals and Hispanic Ministries. This has strengthened ACIERA and helped it become one of the strongest and most developed alliances on the continent today.

Palau’s calls for unity also extended beyond fellow evangelicals. Remarkably, he evangelized in Latin America without ever preaching against the Catholic Church and was able to generate respectful and mutually appreciated relations with Catholic leaders on the continent, including the current Pope Francis. At times, this attitude caused problems with evangelicals who did not agree with his focus on dialogue. To his critics Palau used to say, “I have atheist friends and but I’m not an atheist; I have communist friends but I’m not a communist; I have Catholic friends and I’m not a Catholic.”

Bill Taylor, writer, mentor, longtime member of World Evangelical Alliance Mission Commission:

I first met Luis in Guatemala in the early ’70s. His Guatemala crusades were unique to the nation. I think he was discovering himself, his “voice” and what “worked” in Latin America. He challenged evangelicals across the then-main divide (non-charismatics and charismatics) to come together before he would continue cooperating with them. I belonged to one of the intransigent anti-charismatic groups, but I thank God for Luis’s standards. He had similar problems in Chicago.

His radio programs became required listening for both evangelicals and Catholics. He honestly answered questions. In 1982, he participated in the 100th Anniversary of Evangelicals in Guatemala, and nobody could have been a better gospel champion. Across Latin America he forged relationships with political and military leaders—which constantly got him in hot water. But his apologetic for those steps was close to the Apostle Paul.

This Argentine-born never lost his Latin American roots nor friends, but he became a global voice for the gospel, and creatively adjusted the methodology to the times. He became one of Latin America’s greatest gifts to the entire world.

Howard Dahl, businessman and board member, Luis Palau Association:

It has been a privilege to watch Luis Palau up close for 30 years, including being a board member in recent years. I believe glorifying God means to make God look good by the way you live. I could write an essay on how Luis reflected each quality of the fruit of the Spirit. Luis was so loving, making you feel special while he gave you his full attention. He was one of the most joyous Christians I have ever met, with a singular sense of self-deprecating humor, a manifestation of humility.

I would like to focus on his kindness. Luke 6 says that our Father in heaven is kind to the wicked and the ungrateful. In our world ripped apart in so many ways, Luis won the hearts of so many, including a liberal gay mayor in his city of Portland. Any city that he went to for an event brought people together. I observed in one city an African American pastor stand up and point at Luis and say: “Before you came to our city, I had never prayed with a white pastor before. God has raised you up to bring people together.”

As I read John 17 and the prayer of Jesus for his followers to be one, so that the world might believe by seeing genuine, loving, unified believers, I put Luis at the top of my list of leaders who have been faithful to this task.

Francis Chan, preacher, author, and missionary:

I don’t think there was ever a time that I met with Luis and didn’t leave deeply encouraged. Many leaders are eager to share their opinions and accomplishments, but Luis was eager to bless.

I had the honor of serving alongside Luis on several occasions. While I was impressed by his graciousness and charisma on the stage, I was far more impacted by the kindness he exuded in everyday life. He was warm, which ought to be true of those filled with light but often is not the case. What I remember most was the way that he shared with our taxi driver on the way to our venue. I kept thinking, “He’s so likable and winsome.” The gospel flowed so naturally from his lips. It wasn’t forced or spoken out of obligation. I thank God for his grace upon Luis, that he could faithfully preach the gospel for so many years—on large platforms and taxi rides.

What set Luis apart was that he showed signs of being Spirit-filled. Ephesians 5:18–21 describes a Spirit-filled person as “singing and making melody to the Lord” in his heart and “giving thanks always and for everything.” I’ve always thought that a person who could live that out would be a person that would bring life to every situation.

This is what I will always remember of Luis: He was filled with the joy of the Lord. Sadly, we don’t see much of this from Christian leaders. The struggles in ministry tend to squeeze the life out of many ministers, but Luis maintained a joy that made him so likable.

Paul Pastor, author of Palau: A Life on Fire:

Luis’s impact on the global evangelical movement is considerable. But in my opinion, one of his significant legacies has been his impact as a Bible teacher. His simple, memorable Bible teachings, often heard daily over radio stations worldwide, will be remembered by many, especially in Latin America. This grounding in practical and positive messages from Scripture—and more, the feeling that the Bible was accessible for anyone—has had enormous impact on millions of listeners over the decades.

Evangelism—especially mass evangelism at the scale and pace in which Luis specialized—has a patchwork history. On the one hand, it has a remarkable tradition, including some of the great open-air preachers of history, and has been responsible for great social movements in recent centuries. But on the other hand, it is difficult to think of another ministry (until the rise of the “celebrity pastor”) so prone to gaudy glitz, “puff,” and in extreme cases, the full range of charlatanry and abuse of which religion is capable. In this world, Luis stood apart.

His lifestyle remained comfortable but with a monkishly simple streak in a small suburb of Portland, Oregon. His library was surprisingly wide-ranging, flowing from his belief that a teacher of the Bible should never stop learning. For all his fire and persistent stubborn streak, he had spent a lifetime building a team of genuine partners rather than yes-men. Few living preachers had more to boast of than he did. I venture that few were more terrified of such boasting.

Luis lived in genuine dread of being perceived as something that he was not. He was fully aware of the tendency to elevate preachers to superhuman status. Several times before we began, he started to back out of the memoir-writing process, concerned it would encourage hagiography. (His Latin fire would show: “Last thing the world needs is more stupid Palau!”) Eventually he was persuaded to go forward with the work because of the suggestion to make each chapter focus on some person who’d been instrumental in his journey: his parents, mentors, wife, children, teammates, friends.

He was honest about the blend of faith and doubt that was assailing him in his journey through terminal lung cancer. He was very clear that while preaching to crowds in the tens of thousands was not such a big deal, he felt butterflies every time he shared “the good news” with someone one on one. He was tender, weeping openly as we discussed memories of the past. In short, he was human, full of all the little beauties and shortcomings we all carry in various measures, and never did I see him try to hide that humanity. This example of raw and simple faith informed his work and teaching, and has become one of his great gifts to me.

Matt Redman, worship leader and songwriter, United Kingdom:

I will never forget the moment I heard Luis Palau preach the gospel. I was 10 years old and had been brought along to “Mission to London” in Queens Park Rangers soccer stadium. Tens of thousands of us were gathered there that night in the UK’s capital city to hear this Argentinian evangelist convey the gospel message. He spoke of Christ’s saving love on the cross, and of the perfect Father heart of God. Having lost my own dad just a few years before, that part of the preaching was particularly meaningful to me—and I found myself surrendering to Jesus, a new-born Christian.

My next connection with Luis was maybe 15 years or so later. By then I was a full-time songwriter and worship leader, and had been invited to minister as part of a mission in the north of England—of which the Palau organization were also a part. It was a wonderful night in Manchester Cathedral, and I took note of how Luis had lost none of his fire. He preached the good news of Jesus Christ just as passionately as he had done so all those years before in London. Indeed, that passion and fire was the mark of the man. Luis always sounded enthralled with the love of Christ and overwhelmed to the core by the powerful grace of the gospel. Whether a one-on-one conversation— or preaching Christ on a factory floor, from a church pulpit, or on a stadium stage—Luis always invested his heart and soul into the moment.

Just over a year ago was the last time I heard Luis preach. This time his body was battling cancer. And yet that very same fervour for the good news of Jesus shone through. He spoke of heaven and all the glories that lie in store for those who choose to worship Christ. I am so heartened that he is now experiencing those glories he spoke of that day—and that he is face to face his beloved Savior.

I have heard it said, “Never meet your heroes,” but I am so glad that I did.

TobyMac, Christian hip hop recording artist:

I’ve had the honor of calling Dr. Luis Palau “Papa Palau” for many years now, as I am related to him through my wife’s sister Wendy and her husband Andrew Palau. I called him Papa because it always felt that way to me. A warm-hearted soul with a deep well of wisdom and spiritual maturity. He offered it freely, and I counted it a privilege to spend time with him.

Papa Palau had a love for the Bible and its principles, as much as any man I have ever met. And he was always the same—the same man at his home or on vacation as the man that stood on the platform in front of millions and millions. That test of character is the toughest to pass, but he lived it well. It has inspired me to try and live with that kind of consistency.

We will miss him, his smile, his grand enthusiastic personality. And his desire for everyone to hear the good news! And I will miss him. I will miss knowing he’s there, and I will miss the subtle reinforcement he offers that I am on the right path.

Diane Comer, author and cofounder of Intentional Parents International:

I had the privilege of knowing Luis Palau as more than the world-famous evangelist he most certainly was. I knew him as a spiritual father, a wise counselor, an occasional mentor—and even more, as a man whose life patterned for me who and how I wanted to be.

The Luis I knew and now grieve was a humble man. A man who carried his confidence in God to such lengths that it permeated his entire being. Everything for Luis was about a world that needed Jesus. Yes, he was an evangelist to hundreds of thousands, even millions, yet he saw those crowds as real people.

I know, because when I was in my late 20s and Luis heard that I was losing my hearing, his compassion brought healing to my grief. How did he even remember me—the wife of his sometimes worship leader? Yet over years and decades his concern never wavered. He prayed for me. He cared.

His impact on my life—on the life of our entire family—is immeasurable. Luis showed us what it looked like to live every day wholly devoted to God’s calling with absolute, complete dedication. And maybe even more important, Luis showed us that faithfulness over a lifetime is, in the end, the best possible way to bring honor to the name of Jesus.

Rick McKinley, lead pastor of Imago Dei Community in Portland:

The first time I heard Luis, he was speaking at a chapel at Multnomah University in 1989. I was a very new Christian, less than a year into my faith, with a huge desire to see others come to know the Jesus that was changing my life. I was struggling, though. I had a dramatic conversion and was consumed with the drama of Jesus and his kingdom as I read through the New Testament. The struggle I was having was acclimating to the church. It seemed that the dramatic encounter I had and had read about was … well, it was less than dramatic inside the church.

Luis passionately preached (from John 14), “Dream big dreams, pray big prayers, and attempt great things.” Not only did he preach it, he believed it with every vibrating atom in his body. When Jesus said, “You will do even greater things than these because I am going to the Father,” most of us move right past it, but Luis took Jesus at his word. As I sat there, the drama that had captured my heart when Jesus saved me was rekindled by Luis that day. God used Luis to fan the flame of big faith and big dreams for our big God.

Over the years, I have had the privilege of working with Luis and encouraging local pastors, not only in Portland, but in other cities as well. One of the most incredible testimonies, in my opinion, is that in every city in America and throughout the world, local pastors have great trust, respect, and admiration for Luis Palau. After years of ministry, his integrity to the gospel and love for Jesus have created spiritual favor from local pastors around the globe in a way that we may never see again in our lifetimes. Luis was an encouragement to pastors, had appreciation for what they did, and honored the local church. Luis was not about Luis, he was about Christ and others.

Over three years ago, when Luis was first diagnosed with cancer, many of us prayed that God would heal him. The doctors at the time had been talking in terms of months to live, not years. Our Lord gave Luis three more years to do what Jesus made him for: to share the message of our Savior’s love. I think of the people who have come to faith hearing Luis preach over these last few years. How God preserved his life that others might know the Lord. Luis didn’t waste much time during those last years, and he went about preaching as often as his body would allow him, and ministering to local pastors. It was no longer about doing ministry, Luis’s life was a ministry. He simply had to be himself, and people were blessed.

As a pastor, when I think of Luis Palau, I am grateful for how he modeled to so many of us what it means to finish well. Today, most ministry leaders don’t finish well. It’s a harsh reality and one that we need to reckon with. For many of us, ministry can be an idol, and when we get older and need to release our ministries to others, we find we have lost our identity. Many leaders pick up some other idol and put it in the place ministry once sat. We might start out running well but never finish the race set before us. But Luis never quit. The ministry wasn’t an idol for him. Luis ran all the way to the tape. The reason I think he finished well is because Jesus was always the point of everything for Luis. The ministry was a means to an end, getting the gospel out to the world. Ministry was never an end to itself. Luis finished well because Jesus was his goal.

News

Died: Luis Palau, Who Preached the Gospel from Portland to Latin America and Beyond

The Argentine-born evangelist rose from Billy Graham translator to lead millions from more than 80 countries to make decisions to follow Jesus.

Luis Palau

Luis Palau

Christianity Today March 11, 2021
Courtesy of Luis Palaus Association / Edits by Rick Szuecs

Evangelist Luis Palau has died at age 86 of lung cancer. An immigrant from Argentina who made his home in the United States, Palau became one of Billy Graham’s most prominent successors and shared the gospel in more than 80 countries around the world. His ministry led millions of individuals to make personal decisions to follow Jesus.

Palau preached the gospel to heads of state in Latin America and as the Iron Curtain fell in the USSR, his crusades bringing together a diverse array of Christians, including Protestants, Orthodox, and Catholics. As a young man, Palau interpreted for Graham, who later helped fund Palau’s evangelism organization when it officially started in 1978.

Palau began evangelizing during a historic moment for Latin American evangelicalism. Pentecostalism had first arrived in the region in the early 1900s. By the 1960s and ’70s, Ecuador’s Rene Padilla and Peru’s Samuel Escobar began arguing for misión integral (comprehensive mission), challenging an evangelicalism that they believed too narrowly focused on individual personal salvation at the expense of larger social concerns. Palau did not follow this trajectory. His writings in Spanish critiqued liberation theology, and his ministry focused on conversions. Much of his later work, however, sought to actively engage the community, especially in his home city of Portland, Oregon.

“Palau had a great way of preaching the gospel in an accessible manner and planting spiritual priorities aimed toward personal salvation in Christ, but he also had a certain social awareness,” said Notre Dame history professor Darren Dochuk. “If not a full-fledged social gospel, a message nevertheless that was aware of social concerns.”

In the 1990s, Palau’s global ministry began intentionally focusing on the US. Under the influence of his sons, who took active leadership roles in the ministry, his evangelistic events increasingly became marked by rock concerts and community service projects. In 1999, The New York Times asked who might succeed Graham. Palau was the first candidate.

Despite living out his adult life in the US, Palau remained connected to Latin America largely through the radio—the same medium through which he first heard Graham preach as a teenager, an event which inspired his evangelism. He often bought simultaneous primetime coverage to televise his crusades. Outside his public preaching, he also appeared on the region’s local television, taking viewer questions and leading locals to the Lord.

Palau grew up in Ingeniero Maschwitz, a small town about 30 miles outside Buenos Aires. He was born in 1934, the only boy in a family of seven children, in a bilingual family to a father whose parents immigrated from Spain after World War I and a mother with Scottish and French family. Palau’s parents, Luis Palau Sr. and Matilde Balfour de Palau, became Christians after Edward Rogers, a high-ranking British oil executive, gave Palau’s mother a Bible. Rogers served as a key spiritual influence on Palau during his childhood, and when Palau’s father unexpectedly died, Rogers financially helped the family out.

Palau’s own conversion experience happened while he was at summer camp in 1947, when a camp counselor led him to Christ.

“You don’t have to have a jaw-dropping story of how you received Jesus. It just must be yours,” Palau later wrote in a memoir. “Some have the light falling from heaven, the Damascus road experience that takes them from the ‘chief of sinners’ into the arms of Jesus. Some of us are kids just starting to learn what sin means, and the light from heaven looks like a shaky flashlight beam on the page of a Bible as chilly rain falls around. All that is important in our conversion is the reality of it.”

Palau first learned English from a young age through his parents, who were bilingual. Much of his education was also in English, first at a British boarding school and later at a prestigious academy associated with Cambridge University.

After finishing school and finding work at a Bank of London branch, Palau first encountered Graham’s voice over the radio as a teenager in Argentina. Within several years, Palau himself had petitioned his local radio to allow him to give sermons. Having initially aspired to become a lawyer, Palau now began dreaming of ministry with the global scale and mass evangelism that marked Graham’s crusades. Around the same time, he attended a Bible study led by visiting American pastor and writer Ray Stedman, who over the next couple months urged the Argentine to move to the US to train for ministry.

When he arrived in California’s San Francisco Bay Area, Palau lived with Stedman, who was also simultaneously mentoring a young Chuck Swindoll. Stedman’s mentorship extended beyond assigning books or imposing advice. He brought Palau with him to congregant counseling sessions, teased him about his legalistic background, and regaled him with his surprisingly frank and seemingly taboo-broaching stories. Stedman encouraged Palau to attend Dallas Theological Seminary, but Palau felt daunted by the four-year commitment and opted for a one-year program at Multnomah School of the Bible (now Multnomah University).

At Multnomah, Palau met his wife, Patricia, an Oregon resident who had her own dreams of global evangelism. After they married, the couple moved to Detroit before spending time in Costa Rica, Colombia, and Mexico with Overseas Crusades mission agency. As they expanded their family—they ultimately had four boys—the Palaus decided to raise their children in Oregon. Palau continued to travel while Pat stayed at home. He once calculated, 57 years into their marriage, that they had spent a cumulative 15 years apart because of his traveling.

“Never was it lost on me that many of the most precious moments, the treasures of my sons’ lives, came and went without me,” later wrote Palau. “I don’t regret the choice. I do mourn the many memories that had to be made without me there.”

Palau had briefly met Graham when the latter visited Argentina, but their paths crossed again as Palau approached 30. Palau looked up to Graham, emulating his city-centered strategy, naming successful businessmen to his ministry board, populating his sermons with current events, tapping prominent athletes to give testimonies at his events, and not attempting a crusade unless a diverse coalition of churches invited him. At the beginning of his ministry, he translated for Graham, and over the course of their decades’ long ministries, they partnered together at various times.

Palau’s crusades often followed decades of ministry by local churches and Bible societies, many of them Pentecostal. Beyond addressing the crowds, Palau and his evangelistic team sought meetings with the region’s leaders. “A scheduled twelve-minute conversation with President Carlos Arana Osorio of Guatemala lasted an hour; the president accepted a Bible from Palau, stating he wanted to study it,” reported CT in 1974.

Perhaps Palau’s most notorious friend was Guatemalan dictator Efraín Ríos Montt (who counted a number of evangelical leaders as pals), who was later convicted of genocide. (The verdict was overturned.) “It’s great to have a Christian president as a model,” Palau told CT in 1983. “The hand of God appears to be on him.”

Despite his international ministry and the political upheaval that Latin America endured in the second half of the 20th century, Palau gained a reputation as one who rarely commented on politics.

“Those who are called to enter the political arena should take it as a ministry from the Lord. I don’t care if he or she is left wing, right wing, an atheist, or a religious leader; I always tell politicians, ‘Your position is a delegated authority from God, and you are a minister of God,’” said Palau in 1996. “So I encourage them to think of justice and righteousness, and to defend the poor and the needy. That’s the role of a politician.”

Beyond his connections with political leaders, Palau was also longtime friends with the man who would become the most famous Argentine in the world: Jorge Bergoglio. When that friend became Pope Francis in 2013, Palau cheered the appointment.

“It was exciting because of Argentina, because of his personality, and because of his openness toward evangelical Christians,” he told CT in 2013. “I got kind of emotional, simply having known him.”

This spirit of ecumenical partnership also marked Palau’s crusades, which often reflected months of on-the-ground partnership with local churches and trust building between long-estranged Christians. Routinely, these collaborations extended beyond reaching out to Protestant congregations. In countries like Egypt and Russia, where evangelicals and Orthodox Christians had long been at odds, the crusades served as catalysts for partnership. In Central America, Catholics and charismatics attended his events.

This camaraderie did not necessarily extend to his adopted country. In 1976, Palau canceled a Chicago crusade targeted toward Hispanic Christians over division between Pentecostal and non-Pentecostal Christians.

“Interestingly enough, America is the toughest country in the world to get denominations to work together. America talks up the ‘one nation under God’ theme, but it’s pure theory,” Palau told CT in 1996. “The major work in a citywide crusade is not touching the nonconverted. It is bringing the churches together to touch the unconverted.”

Despite his Argentine heritage, when he left South America, Palau’s theological training, relationships, and ministry structure meant that much of the world regarded him as an American.

“He adopts the Billy Graham model. He has this great organization behind him that provides accountability, managerial expertise, fundraising, legitimacy,” said Daniel Ramirez, associate professor of religion at Claremont Graduate University. “That comes from the US. That doesn’t come from Latin America.”

Over time, Palau’s US presence became stronger—and began to differentiate itself from the model that many of his international events had taken. His sons convinced him to drop the word crusade for festival—a suggestion he at first fought. He, like many of his contemporaries, began swapping venues from sports arenas to downtown city parks. Many events also began to include community service projects. Over one spring break, he broadcasted at dozens of churches via satellite, with the congregations encouraged to reach college students through beach parties with local bands, speakers, and local sports.

“He was clearly orthodox and simultaneously not obnoxious,” said Ed Stetzer, executive director of the Wheaton College Billy Graham Center. “That’s something not everyone pulls off on a national stage. He did.”

Several years later, his Portland-area based ministry also drew attention for building intentional relationships with the mayor at the time, who was openly gay, and for collaborating with a city that boasted a secular and progressive reputation. At times, Palau felt concern that the ministry’s growing focus on serving the community might overshadow the evangelism he felt called to.

“We run the risk of going full circle and becoming like the liberals,” he told CT in 2008. “We mustn’t water down the gospel because we are having lunch with politicians. I’m committed to preach the blood of Jesus and the cross of Jesus.”

Through his American festivals, he also sought intentional relationships with the Latino community.

“Latinos are in the best position to get the gospel message out to this country because of our high commitment to the family and because Hispanics have a sense of abandon to the gospel,” Palau said. “I just mention a Bible verse and they break into applause!” At University of Illinois–Chicago Pavilion rallies, Palau threw out the first part of a Bible verse and the audience roared back the rest of it.

Palau also believed Latinos could bridge polarized white and black communities. “We have not isolated ourselves like the whites have from the city’s problems, and we don’t have the same historical hurts that the African-American community has,” he stated.

“The Latino surge into evangelicalism will also change the evangelical church itself,” said Palau. “The mainstream evangelical church has become too comfortable in this culture. It has lost its fire, its sense of conviction of right and wrong.”

Despite the polemic political situation in many of the countries in which Palau traveled, he largely avoided offense, with some exceptions. In 1977, Palau spoke to more than 60,000 people in Wales over the course of the month. But in 2005, the city of Cardiff canceled a reception for Palau over his “extreme evangelical beliefs.” That same year, Palau urged Chinese house churches to officially register their churches in order to “receive greater freedom and blessings from the government.” His remarks drew sharp pushback from religious freedom advocates.

Even as his ministry expanded in the US, Palau lamented the West’s lack of passion for evangelism.

“In North America and Europe, however, I find that while there is much discussion about evangelism, real evangelism is hard to detect,” he told CT in 1998. “The evangelical Christians of North America cheerfully pay any amount to go to a concert. They fill the civic center for worship sessions and even intercessory spiritual warfare conventions. But when it comes to face-to-face warfare, which is talking to people kindly but directly about their need for Christ, suddenly the numbers diminish. In too many churches the response to the challenge to proclaim the gospel to their city is, ‘Why should we be doing this?’ and ‘This is expensive.’”

More than 15 years later, Palau doubled down on his convictions.

“We Christians—and especially Anglo-Saxons—have this notion that we know what the other guy is thinking before we even begin to talk to him. We really don’t,” said Palau. “The Holy Spirit said he would convict the world of sin, righteousness, and judgment. Do you believe that? I believe it.”

Palau is survived by his wife, four sons, and many grandchildren.

News

At Mosul Church, Pope Asks Iraq’s Christians to Forgive ISIS and Rebuild

Francis’ personal visit to damaged churches in Nineveh Plains caps historic trip.

Pope Francis, surrounded by shells of destroyed churches, leads a prayer for the victims of war at Hosh al-Bieaa Church Square in Mosul, Iraq, once the de-facto capital of ISIS, on March 7, 2021.

Pope Francis, surrounded by shells of destroyed churches, leads a prayer for the victims of war at Hosh al-Bieaa Church Square in Mosul, Iraq, once the de-facto capital of ISIS, on March 7, 2021.

Christianity Today March 11, 2021
Andrew Medichini / AP

QARAQOSH, Iraq — Pope Francis urged Iraq’s Christians this past Sunday to forgive the injustices against them by Muslim extremists and to rebuild as he visited the wrecked shells of churches and met ecstatic crowds in the community’s historic heartland, which was nearly erased by the Islamic State group’s horrific reign.

“Fraternity is more durable than fratricide, hope is more powerful than hatred, peace more powerful than war,” the pontiff said during prayers for the dead in the city of Mosul, with the call for tolerance that has been the central message of his four-day visit to Iraq.

At each stop in northern Iraq, the remnants of its Christian population turned out, jubilant, ululating, and decked out in colorful dress. Heavy security prevented Francis from plunging into the crowd as he would normally. Nonetheless, they simply seemed overjoyed that he had come and that they had not been forgotten.

It was a sign of the desperation for support among an ancient community uncertain whether it can hold on. The traditionally Christian towns dotting the Nineveh Plains of the north emptied out in 2014 as Christians—as well as many Muslims—fled the Islamic State group’s onslaught. Only a few have returned to their homes since the defeat of ISIS in Iraq was declared four years ago, and the rest remain scattered elsewhere in Iraq or abroad.

“It is almost as if we have more churches than people,” Ashur Eskrya, president of Assyrian Aid Society–Iraq, told CT.

“This is our chance to show what is happening, and to stop the bleeding.”

Bells rang out for the pope’s arrival in the town of Qaraqosh.

“The road to a full recovery may still be long, but I ask you, please, not to grow discouraged,” Francis told a packed Church of the Immaculate Conception. “What is needed is the ability to forgive, but also the courage not to give up.”

The Qaraqosh church has been extensively renovated after being vandalized by ISIS militants during their takeover of the town, making it a symbol of recovery efforts.

Iraq’s Christian population, which has existed here since the time of Christ, has dwindled from around 1.5 million before the 2003 US-led invasion that plunged the country into chaos to just a few hundred thousand today.

Francis’s visit this past weekend aimed to encourage them to stay, rebuild, and restore what he called Iraq’s “intricately designed carpet” of faiths and ethnic groups.

Dressed in white, Francis took to a red carpeted stage in Mosul on his first stop of the day, surrounded by the grey hollowed-out shells of four churches—Syriac Catholic, Armenian Orthodox, Syriac Orthodox and Chaldean—nearly destroyed in the war to oust ISIS fighters from the city.

It was a scene that would have been unimaginable years earlier. Mosul, Iraq’s second largest city, was at the heart of the ISIS so-called “caliphate” and witnessed the worst of the group’s rule inflicted on Muslims, Christians, and others, including beheadings and mass killings.

He deviated from his prepared speech to emphasize the plight of Iraq’s Yazidi minority, which was subjected to mass killings, abductions, and sexual slavery at the hands of ISIS.

“How cruel it is that this country, the cradle of civilization, should have been afflicted by so barbarous a blow,” Francis said, “with ancient places of worship destroyed and many thousands of people—Muslims, Christians, Yazidis—who were cruelly annihilated by terrorism and others forcibly displaced or killed.”

In advance of his visit, the Iraqi parliament approved the long-awaited Yazidi Women Survivors Law, establishing a mechanism for justice and rehabilitation.

But 46 Iraqi and international civil society organizations—including Christian Solidarity Worldwide, Middle East Concern, and the Religious Freedom Institute—called for reparations and support for all survivors.

ISIS inflicted atrocities against all communities, including Muslims, during its three-year rule across much of northern and western Iraq. But the Christian minority was hit especially hard. The militants forced them to choose among conversion, death, or the payment of a special tax for non-Muslims. Thousands fled, leaving homes and churches that were destroyed or commandeered by the extremists.

Mosul, Iraq’s second largest city, became ISIS’s bureaucratic and financial backbone. It took a ferocious nine-month battle to finally free the city in July 2017. Between 9,000 and 11,000 civilians were killed, according to an AP investigation at the time, and the war left a swath of destruction. Many Iraqis have had to rebuild on their own amid a years-long financial crisis.

Priest Raed Kallo was among the few Christians who returned to Mosul after ISIS was defeated. “My Muslim brothers received me after the liberation of the city with great hospitality and love,” he said on stage before the pontiff.

Before ISIS, he had a parish of 500 Christian families. Now only 70 families remain, he said. “But today I live among 2 million Muslims who call me their Father Raed,” he said.

Gutayba Aagha, the Muslim head of the Independent Social and Cultural Council for the Families of Mosul, invited “all our Christian brothers to return to this, their city, their properties, and their businesses.”

Throughout his four-day visit, Francis has delivered a message of interreligious tolerance to Muslim leaders, including in a historic meeting Saturday with Iraq’s top Shiite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani.

But Christians say it will take real changes on the ground for them to be able to return and stay, saying they face discrimination and intimidation from Shiite militias on top of the economic hardships suffered by all Iraqis.

Long-term solutions are needed, Nadine Maenza of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom, told CT. So while Qaraqosh is the success story, only 5 miles south the traditionally Christian city of Bartallah is threatened with demographic change. It maintains the harshest militia presence, she said, some of which have been sanctioned by the US government.

“I want to be optimistic,” Maenza said. “But it is hard to imagine that only one visit will change anything.”

Qaraqosh resident Martin Auffee, however, said he was overjoyed by the pope’s visit and appreciated that he showed he was with Christians as he urged them to endure. But the 27-year-old said many of the young in his area have grown weary of lack of opportunity.

“We don’t know for how long they can cling onto hope and continue to stay in Iraq because there’s a lot of pain, unemployment, and uncertainty,” he said. “My whole life has been filled with pain, misery, war, persecution, and displacement. Things are difficult for those living here.”

At Qaraqosh, Francis urged its residents to continue to dream, and forgive.

“Forgiveness is necessary to remain in love, to remain Christian,” he said.

One resident, Doha Sabah Abdallah, told him how her son and two other young people were killed in a mortar strike August 6, 2014, as ISIS neared the town. “The martyrdom of these three angels” alerted the other residents to flee, she said. “The deaths of three saved the entire city.”

She said now it was for the survivors to “try to forgive the aggressor.”

Francis wrapped up the day—and his visit—with a Mass at the stadium in Irbil, in the semi-autonomous northern Kurdish region. An estimated 10,000 people erupted in ululating cheers when he arrived and did a lap around the track in his open-sided popemobile, the first and only time he has used it on this trip due to security concerns.

On the makeshift altar for the Mass was a statue of the Virgin Mary from the Mar Adday Church in the town of Keramlis, which was restored after ISIS militants chopped off its head and hands.

“Religion is love, grace, forgiveness,” said Louis Sako, patriarch of the Chaldean Catholic Church, in advance of the visit. “Religion is a message, and humanity is its core.

“[And] as for us, we are staying until the end.”

But perhaps some Iraq Christians have a vision for even more.

“This is a time of healing for our country,” Farouk Hammo, pastor of Baghdad Presbyterian Church, told CT.

“But we are still praying for a visitation by the Lord Jesus—a revival—and it will happen.”

Kullab reported from Baghdad. AP Religion Correspondent Mariam Fam contributed. Additional reporting by Jayson Casper of CT.

News

Switzerland’s New ‘Burqa Ban’ Divides Voters, Including Evangelicals

Officially neutral, Swiss Evangelical Alliance says “relationship to Muslims and support for religious freedom” is now more important than “restrictions to ensure our peaceful coexistence.”

A poster supporting the initiative "Yes to a ban on covering the face" is displayed in Buochs, Switzerland, on February 16, 2021.

A poster supporting the initiative "Yes to a ban on covering the face" is displayed in Buochs, Switzerland, on February 16, 2021.

Christianity Today March 11, 2021
Urs Flueeler / Keystone / AP

In a vote that divided Switzerland’s evangelical community, voters narrowly approved on Sunday a referendum to ban face coverings. The new law includes both the niqabs and burqas worn by a few Muslim women in the country, and the ski masks and bandanas used by protesters.

One of two political parties with ties to the Swiss evangelical community supported the Yes vote. The other took no position. The state-affiliated Swiss Reformed and Roman Catholic churches supported the No vote.

After initially supporting the measure, the Swiss Evangelical Alliance (SEA), which represents about 250,000 believers across 650 churches and 230 member organizations, instead issued an orientation paper outlining both the pro and con positions.

“Showing each other our faces … promotes trust and security,” the alliance stated. “But there are legitimate questions if prohibition would restrict religious freedom.”

The measure will outlaw covering one’s face in public places such as restaurants, sports stadiums, public transport, or simply walking in the street. It foresees exceptions at religious sites and for security or health reasons, such as face masks people are wearing now to protect against COVID-19, as well as for traditional Carnival celebrations. Authorities have two years to draw up detailed legislation.

Two Swiss cantons, or states, Ticino and St. Gallen, already have similar legislation that foresees fines for transgressions. National legislation will put Switzerland in line with countries such as Belgium and France that have already enacted similar measures.

The Swiss government had opposed the measure as excessive, arguing that full-face coverings are a “marginal phenomenon.” It argued that the ban could harm tourism—most Muslim women who wear such veils in Switzerland are visitors from well-heeled Persian Gulf states, who are often drawn to Swiss lakeside cities.

Experts estimate that at most a few dozen Muslim women wear full-face coverings in the country of 8.5 million people.

Supporters of the proposal, which came to a vote five years after it was launched, argued that the full-face coverings symbolize the repression of women and said the measure is needed to uphold a basic principle that faces should be shown in a free society like Switzerland’s.

Similarly, the SEA paper stated that “veiling does not generally fit our culture.” But it also warned about the risk to greater integration, as Muslim women may withdraw from public life.

In the end, 51.2 percent of voters supported the plan. There were majorities against it in six of Switzerland’s 26 cantons—among them those that include the country’s three biggest cities, Zurich, Geneva, and Basel, and the capital, Bern. SRF public television reported that voters in several popular tourist destinations including Interlaken, Lucerne, and Zermatt rejected it.

Backers included the nationalist Swiss People’s Party, which is the strongest in parliament. (The two evangelical-related parties hold only a combined 4 of 200 seats.) The committee that launched the proposal is led by a lawmaker from the party, Walter Wobmann, and also initiated a ban on the construction of new minarets that voters approved in 2009.

A coalition of left-leaning parties that opposes the proposal put up signs ahead of the referendum that read: “Absurd. Useless. Islamophobic.”

Wobmann told SRF that the initiative addressed both “a symbol of a completely different system of values … extremely radical Islam” and security against “hooligans.” He said that “this has nothing to do with symbolic politics.”

Marc Jost, general secretary for the SEA, told CT he believes the majority of evangelicals voted Yes. He noted that Swiss Muslims were also divided on the issue.

He trusts the law will not hurt Christian witness.

“Our relationship to Muslims and support for religious freedom have a high priority,” Jost said.

“Much more important than restrictions to ensure our peaceful coexistence.”

Geir Moulson reported for The Associated Press. Additional reporting by Jayson Casper for CT.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube