Related articles and links |  1 of 3

The Protestant reformers named three "marks by which the true church is known": the preaching of the pure doctrine of the gospel, the pure administration of the sacraments, and the exercise of church discipline to correct faults. Today, church discipline is feared as the mark of a false church, bringing to mind images of witch trials, scarlet letters, public humiliations, and damning excommunications. Does discipline itself need correction and redemption in order to be readmitted into the body of Christ? We have asked several experts from different (and sometimes contrasting) professional and theological backgrounds to explain how church discipline fell into disrepair and how it can be revived, so that the true church can fully embody the pure doctrine of the gospel once again.

Day One | Day Two | Day Three | Day Four | Day Five | Day Six

Maybe the most fundamental dynamic in church discipline is also the simplest: Sin happens. It happens in big churches, it happens in little churches. It probably happens at roughly the same per capita rate no matter what the congregation's size. It should sadden everyone, but it shouldn't shock anyone. So the question is not how to respond if it happens. The question is how to respond when it happens.

A second dynamic is also a constant across congregations regardless of size: In any biblically authentic community, sin is confronted, not ignored.

I believe churches try to cover up sin even more than people outside the church do, and larger churches are more prone to this temptation than smaller ones. Maybe it's because we are apt to confuse "bigger" with "more blessed," and mistakenly confer spiritual maturity. Maybe it's because we erroneously think that covering up sin in a highly visible ministry will protect the reputation of the gospel.

But God does not cover up the embarrassing misbehavior of his leaders. From Adam and Eve's sin to Noah's drunkenness to Abraham's lying to David's adultery and murder, the writers of Scripture are brutally honest. "Judgment," Peter says, "begins with the family of God." We ought to set the standard for coming clean. Ironically, when people see the church voluntarily coming clean, confessing sin, truly repenting, it creates credibility. And heightened visibility only increases this responsibility.

Correction and discipline are necessary for all believers, but in the large church we tend to give particular attention to church leaders because of their unique potential to seriously weaken the church's spiritual health and witness.

Restoring Trust
Facing sin honestly is about more than reputation. As Paul wrote to Timothy: "Those who sin are to be rebuked publicly, so that the others may take warning" (1 Tim. 5:20).

At first glance, this verse looks daunting, especially for large churches. If every sin committed during the week by every member were rebuked at every service, it would create a new format: All rebuke, all the time.

But Paul's statement comes in a section on how to handle accusations of sin against elders. The principle seems to be that leaders who break trust can be restored only after an appropriately open response.

Sometimes it takes pain to get it right. I think of one large church where a powerful pastor had faced rumors of sexual misconduct for some time. Church elders never investigated—they didn't want to know. When the reality of the misconduct became inescapable, the pastor was allowed to announce his resignation without any real explanation. He got a standing ovation, and rumors circulated that he had been treated unfairly. The elders had to start over with themselves, the pastor, and the church. This time, an appropriate public explanation was given, the ex-pastor went through a denominationally supervised repentance/reconciliation process, and the end result was an exercise in redemption.

next page... |  1 of 3

August 2005, Vol. 49, No. 8