Land and Building Wars
Ross "Buddy" Lindsay III receives phone calls every day from pastors who want his help wresting their church property from denominational control. As chancellor of All Saints Church in Pawleys Island, South Carolina, Lindsay has spent a decade immersed in church property disputes. He is one of only four Americans with a master's degree in canon law from Cardiff University in Wales.
In September, the South Carolina State Supreme Court ruled 5-0 in favor of All Saints, allowing the 800-member congregation to keep its 50 acres worth $20 million. Before leaving the Episcopal Church (TEC) in 2004, the church amended its charter, declaring that it no longer accedes to the national constitution. The court ruled the national church did not retain clear ownership of the local church property.
"The All Saints case is a roadmap for other congregations to secure their property before leaving their denomination," Lindsay says. All Saints is emblematic of passionate struggles that pit scores of breakaway congregations and entire dioceses against mainline denominations, primarily TEC and the Presbyterian Church (USA). In court papers, denominations paint local churches as secessionists, while local congregations see themselves as defenders of the faith set against an apostate national church.
Each side believes the turf wars could impact the future of church-state relations, since the U.S. Supreme Court may get involved. Lindsay says, "If the Supreme Court rules for All Saints, it could largely be the death of Episcopalian, Presbyterian, and Methodist churches."
Some conservative congregations in the PC(USA) contend that when their denomination has made no financial investment in a local church, it should not stand to gain when a church attempts to leave. "The denomination didn't put a dime into these local church properties," says Parker Williamson, editor emeritus of The Presbyterian Layman, a conservative North Carolina-based journal.
So far, only a handful of parishes have prevailed against denominations. "It's relatively easy for religious organizations that have good legal advice to protect the property from a breakaway faction," says Sarah Barringer Gordon, an Episcopalian and constitutional law professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. "Even if the majority wants to leave, the denomination has documentation on its side."
Historic Precedence
In 1871, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Watson v. Jones that local congregations that had agreed to abide by the bylaws of denominations with hierarchal structures were bound by a "compulsory deference rule." In property matters, the final decision was left to the national office.
Then in 1979, the Supreme Court ruled in Jones v. Wolf that a state may adopt "neutral principles" of law by examininglegal documents to resolve church prop-erty disputes. The South Carolina Supreme Court used the neutral principles approach in its All Saints ruling. After leaving TEC, the church affiliated with the Anglican Mission in the Americas, a Rwandan mission effort with which many former TEC churches have affiliated.
In the wake of Jones v. Wolf, many mainline Protestant denominations have changed their constitutions to declare that real estate, personal property, and endowments are held in trust by the denomination, so that regardless of whose name is on the deed, local churches accede to the national body.
Lindsay says that All Saints is the only local church to confront the accession issue head-on and win. "If accession language remains in the congregation's charter, it is deadly in a church property suit," he says. Episcopal officials believe All Saints' case is an aberration. The church was founded in 1767, before the founding of the national church.

The 'Handicap Icon' Gets New Life

Sidelining the Stigma of Mental Illness

Starting a Dialogue with Hip-Hop

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).












Comments
Displaying 13 of 9 comments
See all comments
Robert McAnally Adams
"... both denominations and litigating churches are convinced there will be dire consequences for Christianity if their side loses." What could those consequences possibly be? Is the writer kidding us? The notion that the cause of Christ could be damaged in any way by the loss of physical property insults the Holy Spirit. Paul wrote specifically against this kind of thing: "But instead, one brother goes to law against another--and this in front of unbelievers! The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be cheated?" (1 Cor. 6:6-7) Is no conscience touched? Is no one shamed? See Calvin http://www.cqod.com/index-01-08-07.html
Josh
I hope the ECUSA continues to sue for the property that they "own". I hope they spend millions until their coffers run dry. They will be left with empty buildings and a membership that has been on the decline for over a decade. I applaud the faithful congregations that have left that "denomination"...with or without their buildings. The ECUSA is more concerned with property than they are with the Gospel message and they will continue to lose members, parishes, and entire diocese until there is nothing left. They will be nothing but a weak shadow of what they once were...with beautiful buildings that will be left to rot...not used for "church" or worship but used for whatever liberal social cause they happen to be supporting this week. If all else fails they could open up planned parenthood locations in their unused buildings...it would be much more fitting.
Thomas E. Duggan
I would not put too much stock in the South Carolina decision. It contradicts a well established body of law in these matters and appears to be a case of the courts of the state protecting what they perceive as the interests of "their own" against "outsiders", a not infrequent occurance. Motivations in these disputes differ. Some are honestly theological, some are power plays to grab and control valuable resources. All are unfortunate.