Ideas

Just War in Iraq

Columnist; Contributor

Sometimes going to war is the charitable thing to do

When the war began in Afghanistan, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld asked a handful of religious leaders to brief him on just-war doctrine. Most of us gave high marks to the administration’s efforts to meet just-war standards. I asked, however, the one discordant question: “How would the administration justify a preemptive strike on Iraq?” Without hesitation, Rumsfeld cited the precedent of Israel’s attack on an Iraqi nuclear plant in 1981.

One year later, the question is no longer hypothetical. As I write, U.S. forces are massing for war with Iraq. By the time you read this, troops may be in Baghdad. But whatever happens, the morality of a preemptive strike will continue as a hot debate. Last September, the President drew the battle line, boldly declaring preemption as a national policy.

This issue is of particular concern to Christians since we are the heirs of the just-war tradition formulated by Augustine 1,600 years ago. Historically, the doctrine’s requirement of just cause has been defined as responding to an attack.

But has terrorism changed the rules? Should the doctrine be “stretched,” as just-war expert George Weigel argues? Can a preemptive strike be morally justified?

The first response from the church was negative. U.S. Catholic bishops oppose an attack unless Iraq can be linked to the September 11 terror strikes. One hundred Christian ethicists announced opposition; so did the general secretary of the Middle East Council of Churches. The new Archbishop of Canterbury and Pope John Paul II both expressed reservations.

But I think this reflects too narrow an understanding of just war. Our attitudes may be unduly influenced by Cold War memories. For four decades, the world was kept in relative peaceโ€”at least from nuclear holocaustโ€”by nuclear checkmate. The West and the U.S.S.R. embraced the policy of Mutual Assured Destruction, in which both sides targeted the other’s cities. Neither side dared attack, fearing a hugely destructive retaliatory strike; with civilians deliberately targeted, preemption was unthinkable.

But this was not the case before the Cold War. Proponents of “anticipatory self-defense” frequently cite a famous precedent of the British attacking across Niagara to prevent an invasion by Irish revolutionaries in Canada. And no less a Christian eminence than Sir Thomas More wrote, “If any foreign prince takes up arms and prepares to invade their land, they immediately attack him in full force outside their own borders.”

In the run up to World War II, many argued that Hitler should not be appeased. European leaders engaged in extraordinaryโ€”and we now realize counterproductiveโ€”diplomatic efforts to avoid war. Had the allies had the weapons, would a preemptive strike against the Nazis have been justified before they overran Poland? In hindsight the answer is clear, as it was to the Christian pastors who were executed for conspiring to kill Hitler.

The question of preemptive strike turns on facts. For 12 years, Saddam Hussein has mocked the United Nations and the world. If he is, as the U.S. and British believe, stockpiling weapons of mass destruction and acting in concert with terrorists, he forfeits claims of sovereign immunity.

Unlike the Cold War, when early warning systems could detect missile launches, terrorists give no warning. If Saddam Hussein were to prepare a missile for launch, the U.S. would certainly be warranted in firing in self-defense. Giving a terrorist a dirty bomb to be delivered in a suitcase is no differentโ€”except for delivery timeโ€”from a missile launch.

Of course, all of this presupposes solid intelligence and the goodwill of U.S. and Western leaders. I find it hard to believe that any President, aware of the awesome consequences of his decision and of the swiftness of second-guessing in a liberal democracy, would act recklessly.

Christians should remember that the just-war doctrine is not grounded in revenge, punishment, or even justice. Thomas Aquinas discussed it in Summa Theologicaโ€”not in the section on justice but in the section on charity (that is, the love of God). As Christian scholar Darrell Cole writes, “The Christian who fails to use force to aid his neighbor when prudence dictates that force is the best way to render that aid is an uncharitable Christian. Hence Christians who willingly and knowingly refuse to engage in a just war โ€ฆ fail to show love towards their neighbor as well as towards God.”

Out of love of neighbor, then, Christians can and should support a preemptive strike, if ordered by the appropriate magistrate to prevent an imminent attack.

Copyright © 2002 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

A ready-to-download Bible Study on this article is available at ChristianBibleStudies.com. These unique Bible studies use articles from current issues of Christianity Today to prompt thought-provoking discussions in adult Sunday school classes or small groups.

Previous Christianity Today articles and commentary on the possible war with Iraq include:

Bully CulpritCan a pre-emptive strike against the tyrant of Baghdad be justified? (Sept. 30, 2001)

Christian Leaders Respond to Bush’s National Security StrategyThe White House outlines foreign policy in a changing world. (September 25, 2002)

Is Attacking Iraq Moral?Christian leaders disagree, too. (September 4, 2002)

Last Month, Christianity Today Associate News Editor Stan Guthrie reported on the plight of Iraqi Christians.

Recent Charles Colson columns for Christianity Today include:

A Clan of One’s OwnHacking through the jungle of identity politics. (Oct. 9, 2002)

The Wages of SecularismNew laws won’t prevent another Enron. (June 4, 2002)

More Doctrine, Not LessWe need to proclaim truth to a truth-impaired generation. (April 15, 2001)

Post-Truth SocietyThe recent trend of lying is no accident. (March 4, 2002)

Drawing the Battle LinesWe need to be informed and discerning about the Islamic worldview. (Jan. 9, 2002)

Wake-up CallIf September 11 was a divine warning, it’s God’s people who are being warned. (Nov. 5, 2001)

The New TyrannyBiotechnology threatens to turn humanity into raw material. (Oct. 5, 2001)

Merchants of CoolWe should be angry that the media hawks violence and that parents allow it. (June 6, 2001)

Slouching into SlothThe XFL is but the latest sign of the coarsening of our culture. (Apr. 17, 2001)

Checks and (out of) BalanceMoral truth is in jeopardy when the courts enter the business of making law. (Feb. 27, 2001)

Pander PoliticsPoll-driven elections turn voters into self-seeking consumers.(Jan. 3, 2001)

Neighborhood OutpostChanging a culture takes more than politics. (Nov.8, 2000)

MAD No MoreIn this post-Cold War era, it’s time to rethink our nation’s defensive strategy. (Sept. 27, 2000)

Salad-Bar ChristianityToo many believers pick and choose their own truths. (Aug. 8, 2000)

A Healthy ‘Cult’A lively response by one unusual audience shows how God’s power transforms culture. (June 12, 2000)

Also in this issue

A. Teach English. Q. How do you take the good news to even the most unlikely places?

Cover Story

The Ultimate Language Lesson

When Pastors Plagiarize

'Confessing' Christians Stick It Out

Word Made Flesh

Evangelicals Grow as Political Force

Swindle Taints Nigerian Church

The 419 Fraud

A Wry Debut Novel

New Christian Allegory

Shockingly Beautiful Prose

Homespun Stories

A Wounded Shepherd

How to Survive Grief

The Real Gospel

Heightened Hostilities in Egypt

Blinded by Pop Praise

News

Go Figure

Muslim Phobic No More

Quotation Marks

Good Samaritan tangled in red tape.

โ€œIndia: Despised Dalits quit Hinduism, find new dignity in Christ.โ€

Homosexuality: Reformed church in Toronto welcomes active gay leaders.

Fraud: Financial Warfare scam targets black churches.

"Human Rights: Activists celebrate as President signs Sudan Peace Act,"

New Sect: Weigh Down guru Gwen Shamblin's Remnant Fellowship grows.

"Ears to Hear, Eyes to See"

Three Temptations of Spiritual Formation

"Violent Night, Holy Night"

Review

Celtic Music in a Christian Key

Wire Story

Prochoice activists take aim at Christian FDA candidate.

View issue

Our Latest

News

Died: Jack Iker, Anglican Who Drew the Line at Womenโ€™s Ordination

The Texas bishop fought a bitter legal battle with the Episcopal Church and won.

Why Canโ€™t We Talk to Each Other Anymore?

Online interactions are draining us of energy to have hard conversations in person.

Church Disappointment Is Multilayered

Jude 3 Project founder Lisa Fields speaks about navigating frustrations with God and fellow believers.

The Robot Will Lie Down With the Gosling

In โ€œThe Wild Robot,โ€ hospitality reprograms relationships.

How Priscilla Shirer Surrenders All

The best-selling Bible teacher writes about putting God first in her life and how healthy Christian discipleship requires sacrifice

The Bulletin

Second Hand News

The Bulletin talks presidential podcasts, hurricane rumors, and the spiritual histories of Israel and Iran.

Which Church in Revelation Is Yours Like?

From the lukewarm Laodicea to the overachieving Ephesus, these seven ancient congregations struggled with relatable problems.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube