Jump directly to the content

What Does the Manhattan Declaration Really Mean?

Also: advocacy groups gear up for the Christmas shopping season with politics and compassion.

A New Christian Coalition?

Late last week, representatives from leading evangelical political advocacy groups unveiled "The Manhattan Declaration," a call for Christian unity on issues of life, marriage, and religious liberty. The coalition of advocacy groups and ministries cut across Christian traditions but did not include many leaders from what some consider the Christian Right's old guard.

Chuck Colson, who led the declaration's creation, called it "a wake-up call—a call to conscience—for the church" and a "crystal-clear message to civil authorities that we will not, under any circumstances, stand idly by as our religious freedom comes under assault."

The declaration, which now has over 20,000 signatures, begins with a reminder of the church's non-cooperation with injustice, tyranny, and oppression. It then states that today, this non-cooperation must include the protection of life, marriage, and religious liberty.

Colson told Christianity Today that these issues "are foundational to a Christian perspective and society. It was important for us to ground all of our moral concerns in the three foundational truths."

"We argue that there is a hierarchy of issues," Colson told The New York Times, "A lot of the younger evangelicals say they're all alike. We're hoping to educate them that these are the three most important issues."

The Manhattan Declaration is noteworthy for both the leaders who signed it and those who did not.

The declaration has received national attention because, in addition to many American evangelical leaders, its signatories include nine Catholic archbishops, the president of the Catholic League, the primate of the Anglican Church of Nigeria, and the primate of the Orthodox Church in America.

However, notably absent are leaders from political groups seen by many as the "Christian Right," including the American Family Association, American Center for Law and Justice, Concerned Women for America, and Traditional Values Coalition. The John Hancocks of Christian Broadcasting Network founder Pat Robertson and Sojourners founder Jim Wallis are also missing.

It is not clear whether these groups turned down an invitation to join the coalition or were not invited.

Leaders of other political advocacy groups gave their own interpretations of the document. For Ron Sider of Evangelicals for Social Action, the document did not present a hierarchy of issues but places the protection of life, marriage, and religious freedom alongside the church's historical work against poverty, racism, and promoting the dignity of women.

"I agree strongly with the Manhattan Declaration, that the sanctity of human life, the historical definition of marriage, and robust religious freedom are under serious threat at this point in our history," Sider said in a statement. "The Manhattan Declaration does NOT say that these are the most important moral issues of our time. It only says that these are crucial moral issues."

Faith in Public Life, which did not sign the declaration, questioned "why Colson would think re-releasing existing arguments about an already clearly defined platform will win over young Christians." It pointed to its study of younger evangelicals, which finds they are more tolerant of same-sex marriage and consider economic issues and health care as important as abortion (though young evangelicals are more pro-life than older evangelicals).

Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said that the declaration is a proactive stand for religious freedom. "At the heart of the Manhattan Declaration is a very significant message from Christian leaders that they will not wait to respond to efforts that would limit or curtail religious liberty in America," said Perkins.


More from Christianity Today
Sidelining the Stigma of Mental Illness

Sidelining the Stigma of Mental Illness

Amy Simpson challenges the church to step up its ministry to a vulnerable population.
Starting a Dialogue with Hip-Hop

Starting a Dialogue with Hip-Hop

Daniel White Hodge finds signs of the gospel in the beats of hip-hop.

The Latest in Movie News, June 17, 2013

Box office returns, Shrek on your TV, casting news, and Russell Crowe.
Popcultured: It's the Thoughts That Count

It's the Thoughts That Count

Why Christians can't be careless about the consumption of popular culture.
Get Instant Access
Christianity Today Magazine
Subscribe now for a year (10 issues) at $24.95 for print, iPad, and instant web access.

International Orders

Comments

Displaying 1–3 of 58 comments

David Hardy

December 05, 2009  6:10am

Daniel Posted: The holiness code was overruled by Jesus, yes.....Regarding the message of Jesus, there is no doubt he had a special place for 'sexual sinners', prostitutes, Samaritan adulterers, etc. But he had no place for the religious leaders who stigmatised and cast them out. Given a choice between the two, I will gladly choose Jesus any time, and disavow the (Pharisaical) Dobsons, Falwells and Pat Robertsons.... Daniel... Jesus did not disavow Holiness... 1Peter 1:15 But now you must be holy in everything you do, just as God--who chose you to be his children--is holy. 1Peter 1:16 For he himself has said, "You must be holy because I am holy." And yes... Jesus was and is a friend of sinners... Because he desires that all should be saved.... Jesus is not so friendly with hypocrites... Those who claim to be holy, yet persist in unrepentant sins.... One of which is the hypocrisy of pretending to be a follower of Jesus while at the same time remaining an unrepentant homosexual.

Daniel

December 05, 2009  5:29am

Well, thanks, David, for continuing the conversation. The holiness code was overruled by Jesus, yes. But there was no knowledge among the Jews of a holiness code and a morality code. They were all just one command from Yaweh. How does that effect having sex during menstruation? Or disobedient children? You could claim that family values requires killing disobedient chidlren, couldn't you (Deut 20:20)? Nocturnal emmisions? Are they without or within? Either way, I am glad I am not a Jew living in that period. Imagine collecting wood to warm your family and getting killed. Whatever the new covenant means, I am glad I am living within it. Regarding the message of Jesus, there is no doubt he had a special place for 'sexual sinners', prostitutes, Samaritan adulterers, etc. But he had no place for the religious leaders who stigmatised and cast them out. Given a choice between the two, I will gladly choose Jesus any time, and disavow the (Pharisaical) Dobsons, Falwells and Pat Robertsons.

David Hardy

December 04, 2009  9:29pm

Anonymous Posted: David, Dan, I already posted on Leviticus, with reference to the Hebrew words. Why did Moses use those words? Re. the death penalty. Well, it was also applicable for disobedient children. And if you want to use abomination today, there are plenty of other things in Leviticus. Sex with a menstruating woman. Eating pork or handling pig skin.... While physical death sentences have come under grace... There is still the danger of eternal seperation from God (second death) that all who remain unrepentant are in danger of... The morality of what God has laid down has remained unchanged... Mark 7:20 And then he added, "It is the thought-life that defiles you. Mar 7:21 For from within, out of a person's heart, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder... As for pork... Mark 7:19 Food doesn't come in contact with your heart, but only passes through the stomach and then comes out again." (By saying this, he showed that every kind of food is acceptable.)

See All 58 Comments
You must be a Christianity Today subscriber to post comments
(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).
Login
or
Subscribe
or
Register

Don't Miss

Want to Change the World? Sponsor a Child

Want to Change the World? Sponsor a Child

A top economist shares the astounding news about that little picture hanging on our refrigerator.
The Stand-in Church

The Stand-in Church

Sometimes we speak the gospel from the bottom up.

The New Televangelists

The New Televangelists

I had to look past celebrity ministry to learn how to really pastor.

more | current issue

Books & Culture

Writing for the Reader

Writing for the Reader

A conversation with ...

Today's Christian Woman

Kirk Cameron: Love is Worth Fighting For

Kirk Cameron: Love is Worth Fighting For...

The 1990s teen heartthrob...

Out of Ur

Tweeting the (other) SBC

Tweeting the (other) SBC

Oh be careful little...

Gifted For Leadership Blog

Habits of the Heart, Part 1

Habits of the Heart, Part 1

Why routine spiritual...

Facebook

CT eBooks & Bible Studies


Shopping