Books
Excerpt

Spiritual Formation Is Becoming Like Jesus

Our new year’s resolutions won’t get very far if we neglect the object of our transfiguration.

Christianity Today January 16, 2024
Illustration by Elizabeth Kaye / Source Images: Wikimedia Commons / Unsplash

Spiritual formation is simply the way the human spirit, or self, is formed into a definitive shape—and ultimately how each of us is formed to be like Jesus. In doing so, we become our deepest, truest self—the self that God had in mind when he willed us into existence be­fore time began.

Put another way, spiritual formation is the process of being formed into people of love in Christ. Let’s parse this out—starting by defining what this process entails.

Formation into the image of Jesus is a long, slow process, not a one-time event. There’s no lightning bolt from heaven. Spiritual growth is much like bodily growth—very gradual. It takes place over a lifetime at an incremental, at times imperceptible rate. Yes, we experience periods of dramatic change like birth or a teenage growth spurt, but those key inflection points are the ex­ceptions, not the rule.

As the Regent College professor James Houston often said, “Spiritual formation is the slowest of all human movements.” This is a provocative challenge to our instant-gratification cul­ture; we’re used to fast and faster—the entire world just a swipe of our thumb away. Click the button and get it delivered within hours. But the formation of the human soul doesn’t work at digi­tal speed.

If we lose sight of this, we will either grow discouraged and give up, or settle for mediocre: “Christians aren’t perfect, just forgiven.” (As if the best we can hope for is a little tune-up on the way to the afterlife.) But we cannot lower the horizon of possibility that was set by the extraordinary life of Jesus and the gift of his Spirit. Instead, we must stay with the process for as long as it takes to actualize our destinies.

And this may take a very long time.

Don’t get me wrong; there’s joy to be had all along the way. You could argue that joy is the defining feature of a life organized around God. But it’s rarely the explosive happiness of an emo­tional high, dramatic yet fickle and fleeting. It’s more like a quiet undercurrent that slowly accumulates at the base of your soul, increasingly welling up like a soft melody that, over the years, be­comes the soundtrack of your life.

Being formed

At the same time, formation into the image of Jesus isn’t something we do as much as it’s something that is done to us, by God himself, as we yield to his work of transforming grace. Our job is mostly to make our­selves available. Pick your analogy from Scripture: We’re the sheep, he’s the shep­herd; we’re the clay, he’s the potter; we’re the child in utero, he’s the mother, laboring in the pains of childbirth.

This doesn’t mean we’re off the hook—“Let go and let God.” No, we have a responsibility to cooperate with God’s transform­ing grace. He won’t force it on us. As Saint Augustine said in the fourth century, “Without God, we cannot. Without us, God will not.”

The reason many Christians get disillusioned over their lack of transformation is because they never learned their part in spiritual formation. Many of us make our new year’s resolutions based on our estimate of what we can achieve by our own effort and strength.

But our job isn’t to self-save; it’s to surrender.

When we unmask the human facade of self-delusion, we realize just how utterly unlike Christ we are in the deepest recesses of our hearts. We are forced to confront our true natures—how warped and wounded we really are. “Physician, heal thyself” is a strategy doomed to fail. In that tender place, we all realize, we need help, power, from beyond us. We need grace.

Formation isn’t a Christianized version of “project self.” It’s a pro­cess of sanctification—of being saved by Jesus. An apprentice of Jesus is one who has arranged their life around becoming like Jesus, as expressed through their personality, gender, life stage, culture, ethnicity, and so on.

People of love

But if you had to summarize Christlike character in one word, there would be no competition: love. Love is the acid test of spiritual formation . The single most important question is, Are we becoming more loving? Not, Are we becoming more biblically educated, or practicing more spiritual disciplines, or more involved in church? Those are all good things, but not the most important thing (Matt. 22:37–40).

If you want to chart your progress on the spirituality journey, test the quality of your closest relationships—namely, by love and the fruit of the Spirit. Would the people who know you best say you are becoming more loving, joyful, and at peace? More patient and less frustrated? Kinder, gentler, softening with time, and pervaded by goodness? Faithful, especially in hard times, and self-controlled?

Are you growing in love—not just for your friends and family but for your enemies? When you are hurt, wounded, and treated unjustly (as we all are at times), are you finding yourself increasingly able to emotionally release the bitterness, to absorb the pain and not give it back in kind? To pray for and even “bless those who curse you” (Luke 6:28)? And is all this feeling more and more natural and less forced? More and more like this is just who you are?

If not, then no matter how well you know the Bible, how many books you read, how many resolutions you make, or how many practices you build into your “rule of life,” you’re not on track. Because the telos of the spiritual journey is to become like God, and “God is love” (1 John 4:8). This is why God is Trinity: because God is love and love cannot exist outside relationship. To quote Saint Augustine yet again, “God is (at once) Lover, Beloved, and Love itself.” He is the one who loves, the one who is loved, and the ultimate source of all love.

Love as defined by Jesus is not just an attitude of compassion, warmth, and delight, it’s also an action. It’s agape—to will the good of another ahead of your own, no matter the cost or sacrifice that may require. As Jesus said, “Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends” (John 15:13). This is the cross. And it isn’t just something Jesus did for us; it’s also something we do with him: “This is how we know what love is: Jesus Christ laid down his life for us. And we ought to lay down our lives for our brothers and sisters” (1 John 3:16).

This is where spiritual formation veers in a wildly different di­rection from the self-actualization movement or the Western ob­session with project self: It has an end goal, a telos—it’s designed to form you into a person of agape.

The late Bible professor Robert Mulholland defines spiritual formation as “a process of being formed into the image of Christ for the sake of others,” and he harps on the “for the sake of others” piece. With­out this crucial element, our spiritual formation inevitably devolves into a private, therapeutic self-help spirituality—which is just a Christianized version of radical individualism, not a crucible to burn our souls clean and forge us into people of love like Jesus.

Yes, there is a journey inward and even a self-discovery that are key to Christian spirituality, but it’s followed by a journey outward into love—into action in the world. Our goal is to be formed by Jesus at every level of our beings. But again, we cannot do this alone. There is only one way.

Christlikeness is the result of Christ in us. It’s all grace; it’s always been grace. “Christ in you, the hope of glory” (Col. 1:27). And us in Christ. In fact, “in Christ” is a phrase used all through the New Testament, more than 80 times in Paul’s letters alone.

Theologians call this doctrine “incorporation”—being incorpo­rated, integrated into the inner life of God himself through Christ. Jesus has come to draw us into God’s inner life of Love loving. As the pastor Darrell Johnson put it in his book on the Trinity, to experience this is “to be alive in the intimacy at the center of the universe.”

As Jesus said in John 17, right before his death,

I pray also for those who will believe in me . . . that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us . . . I in them and you in me—so that they may be brought to complete unity. Then the world will know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me. (vv. 20–23)

This is the gospel: In Jesus, God has drawn near to us—we who are sinful, broken, wounded, mortal, dying, and incapable of self-saving, with many of us completely uninterested in God or even his enemies—to draw us into his inner life, to heal us by immersing us within the fold of his Trinitarian love, and then to send us out into the world as agents of his love.

Jesus’ invitation to apprentice under him isn’t just a chance to become people of love who are like God; it’s a chance to enter the inner life of God himself. The ancients called this union with God, and it is the very meaning of your human existence for me and for every human on the planet, whether they realize and receive it or not.

This, then, is spiritual formation: the process of being formed into a person of self-giving love through deepening surrender to and union with the Trinity. You’re becoming a person; that much is unavoidable. And you’re going to end up somewhere in life. Why not become a person who is pervaded by the love of Jesus? Why not end up in union with God?

John Mark Comer is the founding pastor of Bridgetown Church in Portland, a teacher and writer with Practicing the Way, and the bestselling author of multiple books, including The Ruthless Elimination of Hurry and Live No Lies.

Excerpted from Practicing the Way: Be with Jesus. Become like him. Do as he did. Copyright © 2024 by John Mark Comer. Published by WaterBrook, an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC, on January 17, 2024.

Theology

The Philippines’ Top 10 Bible Verses

Leaders reflect on what YouVersion’s list of the most-shared Scriptures in their nation includes—and misses.

Christianity Today January 16, 2024
Illustration by Christianity Today / Source Images: Unsplash

Below are the Philippines’ top verses of 2023 as determined by YouVersion. With the help of Langham Partnership, Christianity Today asked three local Bible scholars for their analysis of what the list conveys about the state of Christianity in the Southeast Asian archipelago.

Federico Villanueva, regional commissioning editor, Langham Partnership

What is your overall reaction to this list?

I wasn’t surprised. First, these verses reflect the situation of many Filipinos. In the midst of uncertainties, poverty, and political instability, it is understandable that many FIlipinos are drawn to Bible passages which remind them that God is in control.

He has been there from the very beginning (John 1:1). All things work together for good (Rom. 8:28). And he has a good plan for us (Jer. 29:11). So they do not need to worry (Matt. 6:33) but come to him (Matt. 11:28) and cast their cares on the Lord (1 Pet. 5:7).

Second, these verses reflect the influence of Protestant (particularly American) Christianity with its emphasis on personal spirituality and the concern for holiness in an evil and wicked world (Rom. 12:2).

Given the events of this past year, is there a verse you wish were on this list instead?

I wish Psalm 10:15 was included among the top 10 list of verses in my country, given the presence of wicked men in our country and in the world. But Christians tend not to involve themselves in politics and are more focused on the spiritual and inner needs. One of the reasons why our country is like this is there is a huge gap between what we do inside the church and what is happening in the society and the world.

Psalm 10 is part of a lament. The psalmist is complaining against God for his inaction while the wicked are annihilating the innocent poor. In the midst of the so-called War on Drugs by former president Rodrigo Duterte, the majority of the Christian population, according to a survey, was/is supportive of the deadly war. Most of the thousands of those killed are the poor, who do not have the power or resources to defend themselves. And so the situation is similar to that in Psalm 10. But why are we not lamenting? Why are we not praying that God “break the arm of the wicked” (Ps. 10:15)?

Edgar Ebojo, global translation adviser, United Bible Societies

What is your overall reaction to this list?

Admittedly, the list is something predictable and to be expected given the known contexts Filipinos are in. Whilst at first glance there are some passages that may seem more theologically desirable to have been included, the present passages are in fact very encouragingly realistic, and their relevance is on the spot.

The list says a lot about how reassuring the Word of God is in the daily life journey of any Filipino Bible user … even during the most trying and difficult times. This message is to be expected from a book we call God's Word. These passages simply show how relevant the Scripture is in the lives and contexts of the Filipino Bible users! They show that his Word is powerful, relevant, and true!

What might the verses more unique to the list convey about the Philippines spiritual needs?

These passages are very familiar ones not just because they are more widely used in the Philippine church context than others but because of the extremely intimate message they clearly convey, which does not necessarily immediately require technical expertise to decipher its meaning and its significance to the Filipino Christian faith. They simply are very straightforwardly pointing to Christ—the primary (John 1:1) and central focus of all these passages!

Given our local socioeconomic contexts where there is dire poverty, painful difficulties, and discouraging prospects, these top 10 verses certainly highlight the importance of being assured of the “with-us-ness” of God emanating from Jesus Christ (the living Word) as promised in Holy Scriptures (the written Word). [They offer] assurance that even in a very difficult and challenging journey, God is with us!

In our pains and weariness (Matt. 11:28; 1 Pet. 5:7), in our lack and the apparent absence of provisions on our tables (Matt. 6:33; Phil. 4:6), and in the midst of seeming direction-lessness of life (Isa. 41:10; Jer. 29:11; Rom. 8:28), the call to trust God faithfully and committedly for everything remain a strong conviction in the Filipinos’ worship and service of God (Rom. 12:2; John 3:16).

This assurance [not only] encompasses individual and ecclesiastical concerns but also includes national ones. Simply put, these passages are ultimate Scripture engagement materials!

Given the events of this past year, is there a verse you wish were on this list instead?

Considering our present local socioeconomic and cultural contexts, I do not see any other verses more appropriate than what are already in the list. These are on-the-ground information about how the Word of God is perceived and how it underscores the important role the Bible and its plain teachings play in the individual and corporate lives of Filipino Bible users. These chosen passages, derived from different parts of the Philippines and from Filipinos of all walks of life, are nothing but a direct proof of the place of Jesus and the Bible in the psyche of the Filipino.

Athena Gorospe, chair of biblical studies and theology programs, Asian Theological Seminary

What is your overall reaction to this list?

I was not surprised by the verses listed, except for John 1:1. Most of the verses have to do with personal encouragement in times of anxiety and distress, but John 1:1 is more theological and has to do with the nature of Christ. This is an encouragement to me because it shows that Filipino Christians are not just concerned with their own personal existential needs but are thinking about who Jesus is, in a way that connects with the Old Testament and God as creator. Romans 12:2 is another surprise because it shows a desire among Filipinos to be countercultural, to understand the will of God, and to be transformed.

What might the verses more unique to the list convey about the Philippines' spiritual needs?

As I said [above], the top choice of John 1:1 indicates that Christology—the nature of who Jesus is—is an important concern in my context. Philippians 4:6 is not surprising because of what it says about worry and anxiety, but it is just an alternative verse to 1 Peter 5:7, which is among the top verses worldwide. Romans 12:2 has the phrase “be transformed,” which is interesting because transformation and not just salvation has been much emphasized here in the Philippines. The only problem is that Christians have different understandings of what transformation means, even though they all agree on the need for transformation.

Given the events of this past year, is there a verse you wish were on this list instead?

I would like to see a verse that shows a lament, such as Psalm 13:1 [or] Psalm 22:1. With the events of the past months, as Christians around the world go through so much suffering and conflict, they should be able to use Scripture to express their bewilderment and the feeling of being abandoned by God but then find comfort in the fact that God understands their questioning.

Editor’s note: CT’s regional analyses of the YouVersion top Bible verses of 2023 include Africa, Brazil, the Philippines, Singapore, and Ukraine.

Founded by John Stott, Langham Partnership trains, equips, and publishes pastors and leaders in growing Christian communities in the Majority World.

Church Life

Soong Mei-Ling: A Christian First Lady

Throughout political turmoil, Soong Mei-ling remained steadfast in her Christian nationalist beliefs and supported spreading the gospel in China and Taiwan.

Christianity Today January 16, 2024
Illustration by Elizabeth Kaye / Source Images: Wikimedia Commons

The Chinese version of this article is part of a series on "12 Influential Christian Women in Modern Chinese History".

Soong Mei-ling (1898–2003), a pivotal figure in 20th-century Chinese history, holds a distinct place as the First Lady of the Republic of China. Known by various names such as Soong Mei-ling in mainland China, Chiang Soong Mei-ling in Taiwan, and Madame Chiang in the English-speaking world, she played a critical role as the wife of Chiang Kai-shek, the leader of the Republic of China through its fifth presidency, and as the stepmother to the sixth and seventh presidents. While her political role is well recognized, her Christian faith is a lesser known yet equally vital aspect of her life.

Early life

Soong was born in 1898 to a deeply Christian family in Shanghai. Her father, Charlie Soong, studied theology at Vanderbilt University in the United States and became a Methodist pastor. He was also an influential publisher and a key leader of the Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA) in China. Soong’s mother, Ni Guizhen, a pastor’s daughter, further instilled Christian values in their home.

Soong was the youngest of three influential sisters, each marrying prominent figures in China’s political history. Her eldest sister married H. H. Kung, a leader in the Republic of China’s government, and her second sister married Sun Yat-sen, a pivotal figure in modern China’s formation.

Educated in the United States, where she attended Piedmont College, Wesleyan College, and Wellesley College, Soong embraced Western culture alongside her Chinese heritage. She returned to China in 1917, dedicating herself to social work and education, often in collaboration with Western missionaries.

First Lady of the Republic

On December 1, 1927, Soong married Chiang, then commander in chief of the National Revolutionary Army, in a Christian ceremony. Although many viewed their marriage as politically motivated, with Chiang seeking to strengthen ties with the United States through the Soong family and Soong seeking political influence through Chiang, it was also acknowledged that there was genuine affection between them.

Chiang converted to Christianity at Soong’s mother’s request, getting baptized in 1930 amid political opposition from his own party. Battling deep depression, Soong experienced a profound spiritual awakening in 1931, during a period marked by internal and external challenges for China, including the threat of Japanese aggression. Her depression was further intensified by the loss of her mother, whose daily prayers had been a source of strength and comfort. This period marked a pivotal change in her spiritual life, driving her to more earnestly embrace her faith. Soong and Chiang maintained a daily routine of Bible reading and prayer, reflecting their shared, deep faith.

In the 1930s, Chiang launched the “New Life Movement,” a campaign aimed at reforming society through traditional values and discipline. Soong was at the forefront of the campaign, leveraging the church’s influence and advocating for Christian family values, particularly emphasizing women’s roles in societal change. Despite the movement’s focus on Christian ethics, some Chinese Christians were skeptical about the sincerity of Chiang’s Christian faith and its impact on his leadership, with critics suggesting his governance was more influenced by traditional Confucianism and possibly even ideologies of underground criminal factions.

During the 1936 Xi’an Incident, a major political crisis involving Chiang’s abduction by members of his own party, Soong aided Chiang’s peaceful rescue through her composure and strategic approach. After his release, Chiang credited his resilience during the ordeal to daily Bible reading and prayer, sharing with Soong a meaningful scripture verse: “I have created something new and different, as different as a woman protecting a man” (Jer. 31:22, GNT).

Soong’s influence as First Lady reached its peak during the Sino-Japanese War. Domestically, she organized women’s contributions to the war effort. Internationally, she sought American support for China’s resistance against Japan, leveraging her eloquence, charm, and English-language fluency to win over American politicians and the public. (Chiang couldn’t speak English, so Mei-ling served as his translator.) She earned worldwide recognition and appeared three times on the cover of Time magazine. In 1943, the Foundry Methodist Church in Washington, DC, included an image of her in a stained-glass window alongside representations of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms,” symbolizing Asia and women’s empowerment.

Despite the Nationalist government’s victory against Japan, internal corruption, particularly embezzlement within the Soong and Kung families, fueled public discontent. The Nationalist Party’s defeat in the subsequent civil war against the Communist Party led to Mao Zedong’s takeover of mainland China in 1949, forcing Chiang’s government to retreat to Taiwan, where it continued to resist communism.

Years in Taiwan

In Taiwan, Soong continued her influential role, supporting Chiang’s governance and emphasizing Christian values as the cornerstone of anticommunist nationalism. From 1950 onward, she led the Chinese Women’s Anti-Communist and Anti-Russian Federation and the Chinese Christian Women’s Prayer Meetings, focusing on providing pastoral care within military hospitals and among the armed forces, caring for the sick, advocating for women’s rights, and fostering campus ministries. These initiatives reflected Soong’s commitment to connecting her faith with social action.

In 1953, many anticommunist refugees from mainland China arrived in Taiwan and, under the influence of Soong’s efforts, embraced Christianity. In 1950, Chiang and Soong established the Victory Chapel at their official residence and attended weekly services thereafter.

In 1961, during an Easter service, Soong gave a speech that reflected her belief in the “social gospel,” emphasizing the transformative influence of Jesus Christ and concluding that “his character ignited humanity’s imagination, and his actions became a beacon of wisdom, morality, kindness, and humanity. His pure spirit and proactive life have made him an eternal example for Christians worldwide.”

In 1967, Soong received the title of honorary chairperson by Fu Jen Catholic University and actively supported the establishment and growth of several Taiwanese educational institutions, including Soochow University, Wesley Girls High School, and the Gengxin Cultural and Educational Institute.

Legacy and controversy

Soong moved to New York following Chiang’s sudden death from a heart attack in April 1975, citing health reasons exacerbated by prolonged stress and grief. However, she remained active in Taiwanese politics through written addresses and public letters. From 1986 to 1991, she returned to Taiwan, actively participating in politics and governance while exerting significant influence over then president Lee Teng-hui.

In 1992, a Taiwanese government report on the impeachment case of “Soong Mei-ling’s improper use of her passport and the prolonged occupation of public land for her residence in Shilin” led to her withdrawal from politics, and she subsequently lived a secluded life in New York. Soong passed away at her Manhattan residence on October 24, 2003, at the age of 105. Her death was mourned across Taiwan, overseas, and even in mainland China.

While many Chinese Christians view Soong’s legacy positively, others have been critical of her influence. Some of her Western critics include former US president Harry Truman, who labeled the Chiang-Soong-Kung families as “thieves” for embezzling American aid, and Eleanor Roosevelt, who critiqued Soong’s superficial understanding of democracy and her hypocrisy. Soong also faced criticism for vanity, arrogance, a temperamental nature, and a lack of compassion in her personal life. Some viewed her marriage to Chiang as superficially harmonious but internally conflicted, often marred by disputes and not exemplifying a Christian marriage.

Additionally, many Taiwanese Christians believed that under Chiang’s rule, only government-aligned churches received support while churches with different political leanings, such as the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan (PCT), faced oppression and surveillance.

Soong’s unique blend of Christianity and nationalism also invites reflection, especially considering the prevalent notion among Chinese Christians of using Christianity to “save China.” “Religion to me is a simple matter. It means doing God’s will with all my heart, strength, and mind,” Soong once stated. However, integrating this belief into political and family life proved complex, as reflected in her own experiences.

In her 1934 article, “My Religious Views,” Soong narrated the evolution of her faith across three stages: post-study-abroad patriotic fervor, a period of depression after her mother’s death leading to a closer relationship with God, and eventually a desire to align with God’s will. However, Madame Chiang is well known for her “dream” and strong desire to “rule the world.” Her actions led by her political ambition often seemed to contradict her self-claimed desire to humbly follow God’s will. Whether she revisited her views on Christian nationalism later in life is unclear. One can only hope that she found deeper closeness and obedience to Christ in her final years.

English translation by Ariel Bi

News
Wire Story

T. D. Jakes Keeps Preaching Revival After Shooting Down Rumors

Followers continue to flock to the prosperity gospel minister even after his A-list connections spawned recent scrutiny.

T. D. Jakes

T. D. Jakes

Christianity Today January 16, 2024
Nay Mills, courtesy First Baptist Church of Glenarden / RNS

On the stage of First Baptist Church of Glenarden International, Bishop T. D. Jakes didn’t spend much time preaching from the lectern at center stage of the megachurch.

Instead, the televangelist walked back and forth in his dark suit and striped tie, switching a handheld microphone from his left to his right hand, sometimes facing the predominantly Black congregation of thousands gathered for an annual revival at the start of the year, other times turned toward the clergy and the choir members sitting on the large stage.

“The Holy Spirit sent me all the way to the DMV to tell you this is your year to pivot,” the Dallas-based Pentecostal minister said to cheers and applause from the Washington, DC-area crowd, many on their feet on January 5. “You have to surround yourself with people who can pivot because they’re following who you used to be. Now they’ve got to follow who you have become.”

As he expounded on the biblical story of Joshua succeeding Moses, it was not readily apparent that two weeks before, rumors of the kind that might have led to his own succession had gone viral on social media. While some of his many ministries and businesses issued statements in response, Jakes appeared to be treating the rumors as a bit of turbulence rather than lasting turmoil.

The prosperity gospel preacher, entertainment executive, and ministry entrepreneur has grown exponentially since his early days as a storefront pastor in West Virginia. Jakes moved to the Dallas area in 1996 and founded The Potter’s House, now a nondenominational megachurch with multiple locations and more than 30,000 members, according to the Dallas Morning News.

In 2001, Time magazine featured the traveling evangelist on its cover, asking, “Is This Man The Next Billy Graham?” He now sits at the helm of numerous ministries and businesses and keeps the company of high-powered executives and A-list celebrities.

But those connections have spawned criticism and prompted salacious rumors.

In May, University of Pennsylvania religious studies chair Anthea Butler used her MSNBC column to question Jakes’s new 10-year partnership with Wells Fargo & Company that he has said aims to reduce food deserts and increase affordable housing in Atlanta and other cities.

“(I)n working with a financial institution that’s been repeatedly accused of racist lending practices, Jakes will likely be hurting a Black community he says he wants to help,” Butler wrote shortly after the partnership was announced. “Indeed, his partnership with Wells Fargo is tantamount to his working with the fox to raid the henhouse.”

Kelley Cornish, who became the CEO of the T. D. Jakes Foundation in April after serving as an executive overseeing DEI at Wells Fargo, said the foundation, a 501(c)(3) organization separate from Jakes’s church, is hoping to build 300 affordable homes as part of a new development with retail stores and schools at the former site of Fort McPherson in Atlanta in addition to helping bring a grocery store to an area outside the city that has none.

“I would say organizations that want to come together for good, let it happen,” she said in a Thursday interview with Religion News Service in response to Butler’s assessment. “The past is the past, but at some point, you have to figure out how do you course correct, and so our partnerships, a lot, are about course correction. And we’re excited about that. We have access to the community that they want to serve or serve better.”

More recently, unverified allegations of sexual misconduct at parties hosted by hip-hop mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs have put Jakes in headlines. In December, a TikTok and YouTube video alleged that Jakes engaged in gay sex at Combs’s parties. Separately, a talk-show host accused Jakes of improper behavior with a young male.

Jakes, 66, was not available for an interview at the time of the early January revival but appeared to deny the claims during his Christmas Eve sermon.

“I will not use his sacred day and this sacred pulpit to address a lie when I have a chance to preach a truth,” he said. “I will stand straight up, head up, back straight, and preach the unadulterated, infallible word of God because that is what the pulpit is for. But there will be a time.”

His ministry responded more directly when asked for a statement.

“Recent claims circulating on pockets of social media about Bishop T. D. Jakes are unequivocally false and baseless, said Jordan A. Hora, executive director of PR & communications for T. D. Jakes Group, T. D. Jakes Ministries, and The Potter’s House in a statement.

“It’s disheartening to witness the proliferation of numerous deepfake photos and the distortion of words through false, sensationalized misrepresentations, encapsulating purported statements to falsely speculate and attack others, including Bishop Jakes. … Chairman Jakes, undeterred by false, perverse, ignorant, and conspiratorial speculations, will persevere in his continued dedication to create meaningful change for millions around the globe guided by the timeless principles of compassion, service, and ministry.”

Derrick Williams, executive vice president of T. D. Jakes Entertainment, added a statement related specifically to Jakes’s connections to Combs, who chaired REVOLT Media & TV, a Black-owned media company that announced in 2021 it would feature a sermon series hosted by Jakes.

“As a filmmaker, executive producer and one of the pioneers of value-based movies, Bishop Jakes, in his role as CEO of T. D. Jakes Entertainment, paid respect to the former Chairman of Revolt during the celebration of his birthday,” Williams stated. “We both greeted the family, Bishop Jakes recorded a brief celebratory birthday video and left immediately to take our other scheduled meetings. Any accusation to the contrary is wholly unsubstantiated, unverified and false.”

While some of the companies Jakes leads or works with, including his foundation, did not respond to requests for comment about the rumors, a number of his collaborators were quick to express their support for him.

“Bishop Jakes is too smart to do something that these people are accusing him of,” said Pastor John K. Jenkins Sr. of First Baptist Glenarden and board chair of the National Association of Evangelicals, who cohosted the January revival with leaders of D.C.’s Greater Mount Calvary Holy Church. “I don’t subscribe to just embracing accusations like that.”

Values Partnerships CEO Joshua DuBois, who most recently worked with Jakes on mental health campaigns for Black men, Hispanic men, and faith leaders, described Jakes as a leader focused on eternal truths, “not sort of short-term, cultural conversations and innuendo,” in a January interview with RNS.

Pray.com CEO Steve Gatena, who in November launched a “Sleep Psalms” prayer and meditation podcast featuring Jakes’s deep voice at the beginning of episodes, told RNS that working with Jakes has been an “incredible experience” and that the two hope to continue the partnership. “We love making a difference in the lives of millions of people together,” Gatena said in a statement.

Just as with the Christmas Eve congregation, Jakes told the revival audience early in his time on stage that he could sense their care for him.

“I love you back,” he said, as people filling the 4,000-seat suburban Maryland sanctuary welcomed him back to the revival where he had been a guest speaker for more than 30 years. “I feel your love. I feel your prayers. I’m thankful to God for them.”

The Rev. Cheryl Townsend Gilkes, professor emerita of African American studies and sociology at Colby College, said she was “not surprised at all” to hear how the revival’s congregation welcomed and responded to Jakes so soon after the rumors appeared. She describes Jakes as a Black leader who has long represented “the unusual combination of giftedness in preaching and giftedness in administration.”

She expects his preaching—which has occurred at national gatherings, including the annual conference of Black ministers at Hampton University, and occasions of national crisis, such as his Washington National Cathedral sermon after Hurricane Katrina—will continue “as long as the Lord keeps him healthy.”

Jakes in 2017 told RNS just before his 60th birthday: “I doubt seriously that retirement any time soon is in my purview.”

He casually mentioned his plans to keep on preaching as he ended his more than 100 minutes on the revival’s stage and urged his congregation for the evening to reject naysayers and focus on what they believe God has envisioned for them.

“If you would do this for the next 365 days,” he predicted, “when I come back next year you will be a completely different person.”

Yolanda Thomas, who has attended the revival for several years, said she had no hesitation about attending this year after allegations surfaced about Jakes.

“To me the work that he’s done, along with his character, has superseded the allegations,” said Thomas, 49, of Bethesda, Maryland.

“I recognize he’s a messenger,” she added. “He’s not God himself.”

News

Iowa Voters Never Lost Faith in Trump

In the GOP’s first primary race, evangelicals didn’t take much convincing to stay in his fold.

Supporters of former President Donald Trump celebrate at his caucus night event at the Iowa Events Center in Des Moines.

Supporters of former President Donald Trump celebrate at his caucus night event at the Iowa Events Center in Des Moines.

Christianity Today January 15, 2024
Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Donald Trump—the far and away GOP frontrunner—has secured a quick win in Iowa, where his campaign’s Christian rhetoric stoked his fan base but disturbed some evangelical leaders.

National outlets barely waited for the ink on the ballots to dry before calling the race for Trump only 30 minutes after caucus sites closed. Some sites were still voting.

Trump won with 51 percent of the vote, more than the other candidates combined, sweeping all but one county in the state. The former president consistently led in the polls by around 30 points, thanks largely to support from evangelical Christians. Around half told pollsters he was their first choice.

That’s a shift from the last time Trump ran in Iowa. The state’s evangelicals weren’t excited about the foul-mouthed real estate mogul in 2016 and favored Ted Cruz, viewing Trump as “the lesser of two evils” when paired against Hillary Clinton in the election, said Jeff VanDerWerff, a political science professor at Northwestern College, a Christian college in Orange City, Iowa.

“The thing that’s just been really fascinating to me over the last eight years,” VanDerWerff told Christianity Today, “has been this slow migration and now this real embrace, it seems, of Trump. That he’s become or is seen as this instrument of God.”

https://twitter.com/TrevinWax/status/1747065695714607385

Early entrance polls from CNN found that 55 percent of white evangelical Christians said they were supporting Trump.

Despite subzero temperatures, supporters heeded Trump’s call to turn out: “You can’t sit home. If you’re sick as a dog, you say, ‘Darling, I gotta make it,’” Trump told a crowd at an Indianola rally Sunday. “Even if you vote and then pass away, it’s worth it, remember.”

This loyalty comes despite Trump spending less time in Iowa than his competition. His ground campaign was complicated by the former president’s legal troubles pulling him elsewhere. A week before the caucuses, he had an appearance in Washington, DC, for an appeals court hearing Tuesday and another court appearance in New York Thursday.

Two-thirds of white evangelicals voting in Iowa believe Trump would remain fit for the presidency even if convicted, according to entrance polls by CNN.

Monday’s results in Iowa give Trump a chance to say, “I’ve got all the support and momentum. The future primaries are kind of pointless at this point,” Daniel Bennett, department chair of political science at John Brown University, told CT. “He can say that, you know, this is what we thought it would be and other folks should rally behind him to beat [President] Joe Biden.”

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and former United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley were competing for a second-place finish that would allow them to emerge as a clear Trump alternative, something neither landed. With 94 percent of the vote tallied, DeSantis led with over 21 percent, while Haley tailed him at 19 percent.

DeSantis’s narrow capture of second comes after he hit all 99 counties in Iowa. He also earned top endorsements from Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds, as well as pastors and faith leaders, and on Monday, the campaign held a prayer call with one of those leaders, Bob Vander Plaats.

As the front-runner, Trump’s attitude toward the primary has been one of annoyance that it’s happening at all. He skipped out on the candidate debates, opting to hold rallies or town halls as counterprogramming. His camp believes that the former president’s base of support is too strong for any other candidate to overcome, that those challenging him for the nomination are disloyal, and that they may as well skip to the general election.

And unlike the sparse organization he had in 2016, his ground campaign deployed surrogates to make Trump’s case for him: South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem; firebrand GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia; and Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Trump’s former press secretary, all made stops in Iowa.

At Trump’s rallies, speakers, from pastors to local politicians, cast the 2024 election in spiritual terms: calling Trump’s legal troubles as persecution, his foes—from the media, Democrats, or Republicans who have endorsed his opponents—as evil forces, and his supporters as true believers.

The other GOP candidates “should have all thrown their support behind [Trump],” Iowa voter Craig Fleakei told CT. “And if they didn’t, then they agree with the results of 2020 and they don’t have a backbone,” he added.

Trump has made inroads with a different kind of evangelical voter. Over his presidency, supporters began to identify as evangelical whether they were consistent churchgoers or not.

Ryan Burge, a political scientist with Eastern Illinois University who specializes in religion and politics, noted in his Substack newsletter that only a quarter of Iowans identified as born-again/evangelical Christians. Over half of Iowans attend religious services less than once a year, and only a quarter of Iowans report attending church weekly. Some of the steepest declines in religious attendance occurred among rural areas of the state, he noted.

“There’s just no way to look at this and argue that Iowa is a bastion of Christian values,” Burge wrote. “It’s just not.”

Still, Christian imagery and language was all over Trump campaign events across the state. At a rally last month in Coralville, Iowa, one woman wearing an oversized cross necklace toted a Trump sign. Another wore a T-shirt that read, “Jesus Is My Savior, Trump Is My President.”

“Whether it’s [pro-life], whether it’s Israel, whether it’s religious freedom, the litany of good things that are important to Christians … President Trump promised and then delivered,” Rep. Bobby Kaufmann, the Trump campaign’s senior Iowa advisor, told CT.

But their use of Christianity has led into some shaky theological territory.

Perhaps inspired by one of DeSantis’s Florida gubernatorial campaign ads, one video that Trump shared on his Truth Social account—and played at campaign rallies—is a prime example. Made by a group that calls itself Trump’s Online War Machine, the video adapted the late broadcaster Paul Harvey’s “So God Made a Farmer” monologue with artificial intelligence to weave in mentions of Trump.

“God looked down on his planned Paradise and said, ‘I need a caretaker.’ So God gave us Trump,” the narrator said. The video paints Trump in hagiographic terms: as someone who goes into a “den of vipers” and deals with the “fake news, for their tongues as sharp as serpents” (a reference to Psalm 140), and wraps up “a hard week’s work by attending church on Sunday.”

“God said, ‘I need somebody who will be strong and courageous, who will not be afraid or terrified of the wolves when they attack a man who cares for the flock,’” the narration continues, “‘a shepherd to mankind who will never leave nor forsake them.’ … So God made Trump.”

The rhetoric has troubled some faith leaders in the state.

“I find it absolutely sickening,” Michael Demastus, pastor of Fort Des Moines Church of Christ, told Deseret News. “Trump is not the Messiah.”

Steve Deace, a conservative Christian Iowa-based talk show host who supported DeSantis, said on social media, “We already have a Messiah to place our hope and faith in. What we need is a president who can manage this place somewhat competently until He returns.”

Monday’s results show that, at least in Iowa, the average white evangelical voter was not troubled by Trump’s approach.

“Sure, certain pastors … might look at that language and kind of roll their eyes or even be really troubled by it,” said Bennett at John Brown. “But if you consider yourself maybe culturally Christian or have this relationship with Jesus that’s not being discipled outside of political echo chambers or something, I think you’re going to be more predisposed to that and not be bothered by it at all.”

At the Coralville rally, Joel Tenney, a 27-year-old evangelist, told the crowd that the election was “part of a spiritual battle” that included “demonic forces.” Tenney predicted that Trump would win the White House and that when he did, “there will be a retribution against all those who have promoted evil in this country.”

Trump allies say that evangelical voters’ loyalty to Trump stems from the track record of his presidential administration.

In September, at a summit hosted by the conservative Family Research Council, Trump made the pitch that “no president has ever fought for Christians as hard as I have. And I will keep on fighting for Christians as hard as I can for four more years in the White House.”

He said his administration did more for religious liberty “than any administration in history, according to everybody.” He’s pledged to establish a task force to address “anti-Christian” bias if reelected.

“I think the biggest thing I've heard from Christian voters is ‘Let's make sure that everything that the president did for us is maintained,’” Kaufmann, Trump’s advisor in Iowa, said. “But also, ‘let's make sure that we can continue to go on offense to fight for Christianity,’ which the president has done and will continue to do.”

Next up in the primary comes New Hampshire, where Haley’s poll numbers have been on the rise with the state’s more moderate electorate. But there as well, Trump holds the lead.

Haley spent less time in Iowa than the others. Her campaign was boosted by a November endorsement from the conservative group Americans for Prosperity Action, which reached out to voters in every county.

Meanwhile, the crowd of presidential hopefuls has started to thin: Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, the GOP candidate most willing to criticize Trump, dropped out Wednesday. Political newcomer and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy took his fourth place finish in Iowa as a sign to bow out of the race. After garnering around 7 percent Monday night, he suspended his campaign and encouraged his supporters to back Trump instead.

तिल के दानों को आग में फेंकना और पापों को जलाना

क्या मसीही ईश-विज्ञान सर्दियों में आने वाले सिक्ख त्यौहार लोहड़ी में की जाने वाली प्रार्थना द्वारा सुझाई गई मान्यताओं के साथ पूर्ण सहमति में है?

Residents throw sweets, peanuts, puffed rice, and popcorn into a bonfire during the Lohri celebrations in Rajpura.

Residents throw sweets, peanuts, puffed rice, and popcorn into a bonfire during the Lohri celebrations in Rajpura.

Christianity Today January 13, 2024
Saqib Majeed / SOPA Images / AP Images

[Read this article in English]

भारत और पूरे संसार में, सर्दी के ऋतु में, सिक्ख और हिंदू लोहड़ी के पंजाबी त्यौहार के दौरान सर्दियों की फसल के लिए अपने देवताओं का धन्यवाद करते हैं। पश्चिमी देशों के त्यौहार हैलोवीन की तरह, बच्चे घर-घर जाकर लोक गीत गाते हैं और लोहड़ी या “लूट” की मांग करते हैं। इसके बदले में, पड़ोसी उन्हें पैसे या खान-पान की चीजें जैसे तिल की मिठाई यानी तिलकुट, गुड़, पॉपकॉर्न, मुरमुरे और मूंगफली इत्यादि देते हैं। क्योंकि लोहड़ी की छुट्टी की तिथि विक्रमी (एक प्राचीन हिंदू) पंचांग के अनुसार आती है, इसलिए लोहड़ी 13 या 14 जनवरी के दिन आती है।

लोहड़ी की रात, परिवार के सदस्य, मित्रगण और रिश्तेदार पारंपरिक पंजाबी पोशाक में अलाव के चारों ओर इकट्ठा होते हैं और बच्चों की लूट में से एक छोटे हिस्से को अग्नि देवता के लिए भेंट में चढ़ाते हैं। सभी लोग एक साथ आग के चारों ओर नाचते हुए चलते, तिल के दानों को आग में फेंकते है और पंजाबी में जोर से प्रार्थना करते हैं, “आदर आए दिलाथेर जाए (सम्मान आए और गरीबी चली जाए)” और “तिल सड़े, पाप सड़े/झड़े” (जैसे तिल जलता है, इस प्रकार हमारे पाप जल जाएँ/खत्म हो जाएँ)। उत्सव छुट्टी सम्बन्धी पारंपरिक भोजन खाने, लोक नृत्य करने और लोक गीत गाकर समाप्त होता है।

सिक्ख धर्म की स्थापना 1500 के आसपास गुरु नानक (1469-1539) द्वारा की गई थी और इसके बाद के नौ गुरुओं ने सिक्ख समाज और सिक्ख धर्म को विकसित किया। गुरु-गद्दी में पाँचवें स्थान पर आने वाले गुरु अर्जन ने आदि ग्रंथ का संकलन किया, जो सिक्ख धर्म ग्रंथ की पहली अधिकृत पुस्तक है। सिक्ख मानते हैं कि केवल एक ही ईश्वर है, जो कि लिंग रहित और शाश्वतकालीन है, और वे इस ईश्वर को वाहेगुरु (अद्भुत शिक्षक) के रूप में संदर्भित करते हैं। सिक्ख पुनर्जन्म और कर्म सिद्धान्त में भी विश्वास रखते हैं।

जो सच्चे गुरु [ईश्वर] की सेवा नहीं करते हैं और जो शबद [सिक्ख शास्त्र] के वचन पर विचार नहीं करते हैं – आत्मिक ज्ञान उनके मनों में प्रवेश नहीं करता है; वे संसार में मृत शरीरों के समान हैं। वे 84 लाख योनियों के चक्र से गुजरते हैं, और वे मृत्यु और पुनर्जन्म के द्वारा नष्ट हो जाते हैं। – गुरु ग्रंथ साहिब पृष्ठ 88

सिक्ख भारत की 1.4 अरब आबादी का 1.7 प्रतिशत हैं, और वे पूरे भारत में फैले हुए हैं, जबकि पंजाब, चंडीगढ़, हरियाणा और अन्य आस-पास के क्षेत्रों में ये अपने उच्चतम प्रतिशत में पाए जाते हैं। भारत के बाहर, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका, कनाडा, यूनाइटेड किंगडम, ऑस्ट्रेलिया और मलेशिया में सिक्ख समुदाय की महत्वपूर्ण मौजूदगी है।

क्या सिक्खों और मसीही विश्वासियों में पाप और क्षमा के बारे में मान्यताएँ परस्पर रूप से सहमति में हैं? क्रिश्चियेनीटी टुडे के दक्षिण एशियाई संवाददाता ने एक सिक्ख अगुवे के साथ उनके धर्मग्रंथों के अनुसार पाप के प्रति उनकी समझ के बारे में बातचीत की और समझने की कोशिश की कि “हमारे पाप जले/खत्म हुए” की प्रार्थना को कैसे समझा जाए।

क्रिश्चियेनीटी टुडे ने पंजाबी-पृष्ठभूमि से आने वाले तीन पास्टरों से भी बात की, जिनमें से दो मसीह विश्वास में मन-परिवर्तित होने से पहले सिक्ख पैदा हुए थे। तीनों ने अपने जीवन में किसी समय लोहड़ी के त्यौहार को मनाया है, और उन्होंने समझाया कि कैसे सिक्ख समाज में पाप की धारणा के प्रति उनका अनुभव मसीह विश्वास में पाप की धारणा से भिन्न है।

देविंदर पाल सिंह, निदेशक, सेंटर फॉर अंडरस्टैंडिंग सिखिज्म, मिसिसॉगा, ओंटारियो, कनाडा।

मेरी राय में, पंजाबी अभिव्यक्ति तिल सड़े, पाप सड़े/झड़े (“जैसे तिल जलता है, इस प्रकार हमारे पाप जल सकते हैं/खत्म हो सकते हैं”) सांस्कृतिक भावनाओं में निहित केवल स्वयं की इच्छा वाली सोच है। इसका सिक्ख धर्म की शास्त्रीय समझ से कोई लेनदेन नहीं है। इसलिए, यहाँ तक कि लोहड़ी का भी सिक्ख धर्म में कोई लेना देना नहीं है क्योंकि सिक्ख सूर्य या अग्नि की पूजा नहीं करते हैं। इसके बजाय, लोहड़ी आमतौर पर सिखों द्वारा मनाई जाती है क्योंकि इसका पंजाबी संस्कृति से गहरा सम्बन्ध है।

सिक्ख धर्म में, सभी पापों को एक व्यक्ति के अहंकार और बुरे आवेगों और इच्छाओं में निहित माना जाता है। सिक्ख धर्म जानबूझकर “हुकम” (“ईश्वरीय विधान” के लिए पंजाबी शब्द) का पालन न करना, या नैतिक कानून नैतिक कानून की अवहेलना करने को पाप मानता है।

पापों का प्रायश्चित केवल परमेश्वर पर ध्यान लगाने से और उसके साथ एक हो जाने की कोशिश से ही प्राप्त किया जा सकता है। सिक्ख धर्म के संस्थापक, गुरु नानक देव के अनुसार, “जब किसी की बुद्धि पाप से दूषित या मैली हो जाती है, तो इसे केवल ईश्वर के प्रेम से ही शुद्ध किया जा सकता है।”

आरम्भिक सिक्ख स्रोत प्रायश्चित (कफ़्फारा) के अन्य रूपों के बारे में कुछ नहीं कहते हैं कि, पापी या अपराधी को उस समाज में बने रहने के लिए करने पड़ते हैं, जिससे वह संबंधित था। प्रायश्चित की अवधारणा पूरे सिक्ख इतिहास में विकसित होती रही और इसे [सबसे पहले] गुरु गोबिंद सिंह जी, दसवें सिक्ख गुरु द्वारा उसकी खालसा (उनके द्वारा शुरू किए गए योद्धाओं के धार्मिक सम्प्रदाय) के लिए आदेशों के रूप में कलमबद्ध किया गया था।

इन आदेशों को 18वीं और 20वीं शताब्दी में संशोधित किया गया था और आज यह मुख्य रूप से व्यक्ति और उन विभिन्न तरीकों पर केंद्रित है, जिसमें एक सिक्ख को एक अच्छे, पाप न करने वाला सिक्ख के रूप में व्यवहार करना चाहिए।

सिक्ख धर्म में, प्रायश्चित को संक्षेप में समुदाय में दिखाया गया है और इसमें सेवा शामिल होनी चाहिए।

इसके अपवाद चार प्रमुख पाप हैं: हुक्का (धूम्रपान तम्बाकू और अन्य सभी नशीले पदार्थों का उपयोग करना), हजामत (बालों को कटाना), हलालो (मांस खाना), और हराम (शादी के बाहर व्यभिचार और यौन संबंध)। इनका उल्लंघन करने पर अपराधी को समुदाय में आने के लिए पुन: दीक्षा की आवश्यकता हो सकती है।

रिचर्ड हॉवेल, पीएचडी (मसीही ईश-विज्ञान) और कालेब संस्थान, दिल्ली के प्रिंसिपल। इनका जन्म और पालन-पोषण पंजाब में हुआ और इन्होंने अपने जीवन का एक महत्वपूर्ण हिस्सा वहाँ सुसमाचार का प्रचार करने में बिताया है।

सिक्ख धर्म कर्म को एक व्यक्ति के अस्तित्व के अच्छे और बुरे कार्यों के योग के रूप में परिभाषित करता है जो कि एक व्यक्ति के भविष्य को प्रभावित करता है। यह एक “ऊर्ध्वाधर” संबंध नहीं है, इसलिए एक व्यक्ति का पाप एक पवित्र परमेश्वर के विरुद्ध नहीं है, परन्तु यह “क्षैतिज” है, जिसमें यह अन्य लोगों और स्वयं से संबंधित है। अत: इसके कैसे परिणाम निकलते हैं। कर्म यह निर्धारित करता है कि अगले जन्म में उस व्यक्ति की आत्मा के साथ क्या होता है, चाहे वह सीढ़ी से ऊपर जाए या नीचे। पुर्नजन्म (मृत्यु के बाद एक व्यक्ति की आत्मा का एक शरीर से दूसरे शरीर में जाना) में आगे बढ़ने के लिए, एक व्यक्ति के अच्छे कर्मों को बुरे कर्मों से अधिक होना चाहिए।

लोहड़ी की परम्परा में आग के चारों ओर घूमने और “तिल सड़े, पाप सड़े/झड़े” शब्द बोलना परम्परा अपराधबोध की मौजूदगी के प्रमाण की ओर इशारा कर सकती है। आग में तिल के दानों को जलाना, एक ओर, अगींकार और अहसास की एक प्रतीकात्मक अभिव्यक्ति हो सकती है कि आपने कुछ गलत किया है, लेकिन दूसरी ओर, यह केवल अच्छे कर्मों को बढ़ाने का कार्य हो सकता है।

मसीही विश्वास में, पाप को न केवल अज्ञानता के रूप में समझा जाता है बल्कि यह भी समझा जाता है कि लोग एक पवित्र ईश्वर के सामने दोषी हैं। लोगों ने उसकी आज्ञा की अवहेलना की और उससे अपनी स्वतंत्रता की घोषणा की। वह पाप है, और यह अनाज्ञाकारिता के कारण परमेश्वर के जीवन से अलग होने का परिणाम है।

यीशु हमें परमेश्वर के साथ एक मेल में वापस लाता है, और यह उसके देहधारण के साथ शुरू होता है जब ईश्वरत्व ने मनुष्यत्व के साथ कर एकआत्मक्ता लिया था। यीशु मसीह के बलिदान के कारण हमारा अंगीकार हमें परमेश्वर के साथ फिर से जोड़ देता है। हम परमेश्वर के अनुग्रह के कारण क्षमा का अनुभव करते हैं।

जितेन्द्र जीत सिंह, भूतपूर्व सिक्ख ग्रंथी और एंबेसडर फॉर क्राइस्ट के भूतपूर्व राष्ट्रीय प्रचारक, हरियाणा।

तिल की मिठाई को आग में फेंकने से एक व्यक्ति द्वारा पूरे वर्ष में किए गए पापों की प्रस्तुति होती है, और वे उनसे छुटकारा पा लेते हैं। यह कार्य साल दर साल किया जाता है और जीवन भर चलता रहता है।

परन्तु ऐसा उनके साथ नहीं है जो मसीह यीशु में अपना विश्वास रखते हैं। मसीह ने हमारे पापों को अपने ऊपर ले लिया है और हमें “हमेशा और सदैव के लिए एक ही बार में” स्वतंत्र कर दिया है। इसे हर साल, बार-बार नहीं दोहराया जाता है। मसीह प्रत्येक व्यक्ति को एक स्वैच्छिक अधिकार देता है। यदि हम अपने पापों से छुटकारा पाना चाहते हैं, तो हमें मसीह के पास जाने के लिए चुनाव करना होगा। और यह सिर्फ एक बार का काम है। इसे दोहराने की जरूरत नहीं है। इसके लिए कोई शर्त नहीं है, और अगर हम अन्यथा चुनते हैं, तो हम अपने पापों का बोझ अनंत काल तक ढोते रहते हैं।

संतार सिंह, वरिष्ठ पास्टर, खुश खबरी फैलोशिप, सिंगापुर। आप सिक्ख पैदा हुए थे, परन्तु बाद में एक मसीह विश्वासी बन गए और आपने सिंगापुर में असेंबली ऑफ गॉड बाइबल कॉलेज से अध्ययन किया। आपकी कलीसिया में विशेष रूप से पंजाबियों के लिए एक आराधना सभा चलाई जाती है।

पाप की सिक्ख समझ पाप की मसीही समझ से बहुत ज्यादा अलग है। सिक्ख यह नहीं मानते हैं कि उन्हें पाप विरासत में मिला है, जो कि मसीही विश्वास के विपरीत है, जो यह मानते हैं कि वे पाप में पैदा हुए हैं और आत्मिक रूप से मृत हैं। सिक्ख यह नहीं मानते कि उनका स्वभाव पापी है; उनका मानना है कि उनके कर्म उन्हें पापी बनाते हैं। मसीह विश्वास में, एक व्यक्ति इसलिए पापी नहीं है क्योंकि वह पाप करता है; वह पाप करता है क्योंकि वह पापी है। मनुष्य के भीतर जो है वह बाहर प्रकट होता है।

गुरु नानक देव जी, दस सिक्ख गुरुओं में से पहले गुरु और सिक्ख धर्म के संस्थापक, ने तीन स्तंभों (यानी कर्तव्यों) को औपचारिक रूप दिया था, जो कि उनके अनुयायियों को मुक्ति प्राप्त करने में मदद करते हैं: नाम जपो (ईश्वर का ध्यान करो और ईश्वर के नाम का जाप करो), किरत करो (कड़ी मेहनत और ईमानदारी से जीवन निर्वाह करो), और वंड छक्को (यानी भोजन और धन को एक साथ बाँटो और उपयोग करो)।

इफिसियों 2:8-9 में जो कुछ लिखा है, मसीह विश्वासी उस पर विश्वास करते हैं: “क्योंकि विश्वास के द्वारा अनुग्रह ही से तुम्हारा उद्धार हुआ है – और यह तुम्हारी ओर से नहीं, यह परमेश्वर का दान है – न कर्मों के द्वारा, ऐसा न हो कि कोई घमण्ड करे।” हम कर्मों में विश्वास नहीं करते; हम परमेश्वर के अनुग्रह और मसीह के पूरे किए कार्य में विश्वास करते हैं।

Editor’s note: What do you think of this translation? Want to see CT do more? Interested in helping us improve the quality and quantity? Share your feedback here.


You can also now follow our best articles on our Telegram channel. Come join us!

ਤਿਲ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਦਾਣਿਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਅੱਗ ਵਿੱਚ ਸੁੱਟਣਾ ਅਤੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਪਾਪਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਸਾੜਨਾ

ਕੀ ਮਸੀਹੀ ਧਰਮ-ਵਿਗਿਆਨ ਸਰਦੀਆਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਆਉਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਦੇ ਤਿਉਹਾਰ ਲੋਹੜੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਕੀਤੀ ਜਾਣ ਵਾਲੀ ਅਰਦਾਸ ਦੁਆਰਾ ਸੁਝਾਏ ਗਏ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਪੂਰੀ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਸਹਿਮਤ ਹੈ?

Residents throw sweets, peanuts, puffed rice, and popcorn into a bonfire during the Lohri celebrations in Rajpura.

Residents throw sweets, peanuts, puffed rice, and popcorn into a bonfire during the Lohri celebrations in Rajpura.

Christianity Today January 13, 2024
Saqib Majeed / SOPA Images / AP Images

[Read this article in English]

ਭਾਰਤ ਅਤੇ ਪੂਰੀ ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਵਿੱਚ, ਸਰਦੀਆਂ ਦੀ ਰੁੱਤ ਵਿੱਚ, ਲੋਹੜੀ ਦੇ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਤਿਉਹਾਰ ਦੇ ਵੇਲੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਅਤੇ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਸਰਦੀਆਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਫਸਲ ਦੇ ਲਈ ਆਪਣੇ ਦੇਵੀ-ਦੇਵਤਿਆਂ ਦਾ ਧੰਨਵਾਦ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਪੱਛਮੀ ਤਿਉਹਾਰ ਹੈਲੋਵੀਨ ਵਾਂਙੁ, ਬੱਚੇ ਘਰ-ਘਰ ਜਾ ਕੇ ਲੋਕ ਗੀਤ ਗਾਉਂਦੇ ਹਨ ਅਤੇ ਲੋਹੜੀ ਜਾਂ “ਲੁੱਟ” ਮੰਗਦੇ ਹਨ। ਬਦਲੇ ਵਿੱਚ, ਗੁਆਂਢੀ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਪੈਸੇ ਜਾਂ ਖਾਣ ਵਾਲੀਆਂ ਚੀਜ਼ਾਂ ਜਿਵੇਂ ਕਿ ਤਿੱਲ੍ਹ ਦੀ ਮਠਿਆਈ, ਤੁਲਕੁਟ, ਗੁੱੜ੍ਹ, ਫੁੱਲ੍ਹੇ, ਭੁੰਨੇ ਹੋਏ ਚੌਲ ਅਤੇ ਮੂੰਗਫਲੀ ਆਦਿ ਦਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਲੋਹੜੀ ਦੀ ਛੁੱਟੀ ਵਿਕਰਮੀ (ਇੱਕ ਪ੍ਰਾਚੀਨ ਹਿੰਦੂ) ਕਲੰਡਰ ਦੇ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਆਉਂਦੀ ਹੈ, ਇਸੇ ਲਈ ਲੋਹੜੀ 13 ਜਾਂ 14 ਜਨਵਰੀ ਨੂੰ ਆਉਂਦੀ ਹੈ।

ਲੋਹੜੀ ਦੀ ਰਾਤ, ਪਰਿਵਾਰ ਦੇ ਮੈਂਬਰ, ਮਿੱਤਰ ਅਤੇ ਰਿਸ਼ਤੇਦਾਰ ਰਵਾਇਤੀ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਪਹਿਰਾਵੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਬਲ੍ਹਦੀ ਹੋਈ ਅੱਗ ਦੇ ਆਲੇ-ਦੁਆਲੇ ਇਕੱਠੇ ਹੁੰਦੇ ਹਨ ਅਤੇ ਬੱਚਿਆਂ ਦੀ ਲੁੱਟ ਦਾ ਇੱਕ ਛੋਟਾ ਜਿਹਾ ਹਿੱਸਾ ਅੱਗ ਦੇ ਦੇਵਤੇ ਨੂੰ ਧੰਨਵਾਦ ਦੀ ਭੇਂਟ ਵਿੱਚ ਦਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਸਾਰੇ ਲੋਕ ਇਕੱਠੇ ਹੋ ਕੇ ਅੱਗ ਦੇ ਦੁਆਲੇ ਨੱਚਦੇ-ਟੱਪਦੇ ਹਨ, ਤਿੱਲ੍ਹ ਅੱਗ ਵਿੱਚ ਸੁੱਟਦੇ ਹਨ ਅਤੇ ਉੱਚੀ-ਉੱਚੀ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਅਰਦਾਸ ਨੂੰ ਬੋਲਦੇ ਹਨ, “ਆਦਰ ਆਵੇ ਦਲਿੱਦਰ ਜਾਵੇ” ਅਤੇ “ਤਿੱਲ੍ਹ ਸੜੇ, ਪਾਪ ਸੜੇ/ਝੜੇ (ਜਿਵੇਂ ਤਿੱਲ੍ਹ ਸੜਦਾ ਹੈ, ਇਸੇ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਸਾਡੇ ਪਾਪ ਸੜ੍ਹ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ/ਮੁੱਕ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ)। ਤਿਉਹਾਰ ਦੀਆਂ ਰਵਾਇਤੀ ਛੁੱਟੀਆਂ ਦਾ ਭੋਜਨ ਖਾਣ-ਪੀਣ, ਲੋਕ ਨ੍ਰਿਤ ਪੇਸ਼ ਕਰਨ ਅਤੇ ਲੋਕ ਗੀਤ ਗਾਉਣ ਨਾਲ ਖਤਮ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ।”

ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਦੀ ਸਥਾਪਨਾ 1500 ਦੇ ਨੇੜੇ-ਤੇੜੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ (1469-1539) ਦੁਆਰਾ ਕੀਤੀ ਗਈ ਸੀ ਅਤੇ ਉਸ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਦੇ ਨੌਂ ਗੁਰੂਆਂ ਨੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਸਮਾਜ ਅਤੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਦਾ ਵਿਕਾਸ ਕੀਤਾ। ਗੁਰ-ਗੱਦੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਪੰਜਵੇਂ ਸਥਾਨ 'ਤੇ ਆਉਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਅਰਜਨ ਦੇਵ ਜੀ ਨੇ ਆਦਿ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਨੂੰ ਇੱਕਠਾ ਕੀਤਾ, ਇਹੋ ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਦੀ ਪਹਿਲੀ ਅਧਿਕਾਰਤ ਪੁਸਤਕ ਹੈ। ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਦੇ ਲੋਕ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ ਕਿ ਕੇਵਲ ਇੱਕ ਇਸ਼ੁਰ ਹੈ, ਜਿਹੜਾ ਲਿੰਗ ਤੋਂ ਪਰ੍ਹੇ ਅਤੇ ਅਨਾਦਿ ਹੈ, ਅਤੇ ਉਹ ਇਸ ਇਸ਼ੁਰ ਨੂੰ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ (ਅਚਰਜ ਭਰਿਆ ਗੁਰੂ) ਕਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਸਿੱਖ ਪੁਨਰ ਜਨਮ ਅਤੇ ਕਰਮ ਦੇ ਸਿਧਾਂਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਵੀ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਰੱਖਦੇ ਹਨ।

ਜਿਹੜੇ ਸੱਚੇ ਗੁਰੂ [ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ] ਦੀ ਸੇਵਾ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰਦੇ ਅਤੇ ਜਿਹੜੇ ਲੋਕ ਸ਼ਬਦ [ਸਿੱਖ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ] ਉੱਤੇ ਧਿਆਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਲਾਉਂਦੇ ਹਨ – ਆਤਮਿਕ ਗਿਆਨ ਉਹਨਾਂ ਦੇ ਮਨਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਨਹੀਂ ਆਉਂਦਾ; ਉਹ ਸੰਸਾਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਮੋਈਆਂ ਹੋਈਆਂ ਲਾਸ਼ਾਂ ਵਾਂਗ ਹਨ। ਉਹ 84 ਲੱਖ ਜਨਮਾਂ ਦੇ ਗੇੜ ਵਿੱਚੋਂ ਲੰਘਦੇ ਹਨ, ਅਤੇ ਉਹ ਮਰਨ ਅਤੇ ਮੁੜ ਜਨਮ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਤ ਕਰਨ ਦੇ ਦੁਆਰਾ ਨਾਸ ਹੋ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ। – ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਪੰਨਾ ੮੮

ਸਿੱਖ ਭਾਰਤ ਦੀ 1.4 ਅਰਬ ਅਬਾਦੀ ਦਾ 1.7 ਪ੍ਰਤੀਸ਼ਤ ਹਿੱਸਾ ਬਣਾਉਂਦੇ ਹਨ, ਅਤੇ ਪੂਰੇ ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਫੈਲੇ ਹੋਏ ਹਨ, ਜਿਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੀ ਸਭ ਤੋਂ ਵੱਧ ਗਿਣਤੀ ਪੰਜਾਬ, ਚੰਡੀਗੜ੍ਹ, ਹਰਿਆਣਾ ਅਤੇ ਹੋਰ ਆਲੇ-ਦੁਆਲੇ ਦੇ ਖੇਤਰਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਮਿਲਦੀ ਹੈ। ਭਾਰਤ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਹਰ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ, ਕੈਨੇਡਾ, ਯੂਨਾਈਟਿੱਡ ਕਿੰਗਡਮ ਭਾਵ ਸੰਯੁਕਤ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰ, ਆਸਟ੍ਰੇਲੀਆ ਅਤੇ ਮਲੇਸ਼ੀਆ ਵਿੱਚ ਸਿੱਖ ਭਾਈਚਾਰੇ ਦੀ ਮਹੱਤਵਪੂਰਣ ਹੋਂਦ ਹੈ।

ਕੀ ਸਿੱਖ ਅਤੇ ਮਸੀਹੀ ਪਾਪ ਅਤੇ ਖ਼ਿਮਾ ਬਾਰੇ ਮਿਲਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਵਿਚਾਰਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਆਪਸੀ ਸਹਿਮਤੀ ਰੱਖਦੇ ਹਨ? ਕ੍ਰਿਸ੍ਚੀਐਨਿਟੀ ਟੂਡੇ ਦੇ ਸਾਊਥ ਏਸ਼ੀਆ ਦੇ ਪੱਤਰਕਾਰ ਨੇ ਇੱਕ ਸਿੱਖ ਆਗੂ ਨਾਲ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਗ੍ਰੰਥਾਂ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਪਾਪ ਦੀ ਸਮਝ ਬਾਰੇ ਗੱਲ ਕੀਤੀ ਅਤੇ ਇਹ ਸਮਝਣ ਦੀ ਕੋਸ਼ਿਸ਼ ਕੀਤੀ ਕਿ “ਸਾਡੇ ਪਾਪਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਸਾੜ੍ਹਨ” ਲਈ ਪ੍ਰਾਰਥਨਾ ਨੂੰ ਕਿਵੇਂ ਚੰਗੀ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਸਮਝਿਆ ਜਾਵੇ।

ਕ੍ਰਿਸਚੀਐਨਿਟੀ ਟੂਡੇ ਨੇ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਪਿਛੋਕੜ੍ਹ ਤੋਂ ਆਏ ਤਿੰਨ ਪਾਸਟਰਾਂ ਨਾਲ ਵੀ ਗੱਲ ਕੀਤੀ, ਜਿਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਵਿੱਚੋਂ ਦੋ ਮਸੀਹੀ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਆਉਣ ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਸਿੱਖ ਪੈਦਾ ਹੋਏ ਸਨ। ਤਿੰਨਾਂ ਨੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਜੀਵਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਕਿਸੇ ਸਮੇਂ ਲੋਹੜੀ ਦਾ ਤਿਉਹਾਰ ਮਨਾਇਆ ਸੀ, ਅਤੇ ਉਹ ਦੱਸਦੇ ਹਨ ਕਿ ਕਿਵੇਂ ਸਿੱਖ ਸਮਾਜ ਵਿੱਚ ਪਾਪ ਦੀ ਧਾਰਨਾ ਬਾਰੇ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਅਨੁਭਵ ਮਸੀਹੀ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਪਾਪ ਦੀ ਧਾਰਨਾ ਨਾਲੋਂ ਵੱਖਰਾ ਹੈ।

ਦਵਿੰਦਰ ਪਾਲ ਸਿੰਘ, ਡਾਇਰੈਕਟਰ, ਸੈਂਟਰ ਫਾੱਰ ਅੰਡਰਸਟੈਂਡਿੰਗ ਸਿੱਖਇਜ਼ਮ, ਮਿਸੀਸਾਗਾ, ਓਨਟਾਰੀਓ, ਕੈਨੇਡਾ।

ਮੇਰੇ ਖਿਆਲ ਵਿੱਚ, ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਸ਼ਬਦ ਤਿੱਲ੍ਹ ਸੜੇ, ਪਾਪ ਸੜੇ/ਝੜੇ (“ਜਿਵੇਂ ਤਿੱਲ੍ਹ ਸੜ੍ਹਦਾ ਹੈ, ਇਸ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਸਾਡੇ ਪਾਪ ਸੜ੍ਹ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ/ਮਿਟਾਏ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ”) ਕੇਵਲ ਸੱਭਿਆਚਾਰਕ ਭਾਵਨਾਵਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਜੁੜ੍ਹੀ ਹੋਈ ਖੁਦ ਤੋਂ ਪੈਦਾ ਕੀਤੀ ਹੋਈ ਸੋਚ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਦਾ ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਮਾਣਿਕ ਗ੍ਰੰਥਾਂ ਦੀ ਸਮਝ ਨਾਲ ਕੋਈ ਲੈਣਾ-ਦੇਣਾ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਲਈ ਲੋਹੜੀ ਦਾ ਵੀ ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਨਾਲ ਕੋਈ ਸਬੰਧ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਸਿੱਖ ਸੂਰਜ ਜਾਂ ਅਗਨ ਦੀ ਪੂਜਾ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਇਸ ਦੀ ਬਜਾਏ, ਲੋਹੜੀ ਆਮ ਤੌਰ 'ਤੇ ਸਿੱਖਾਂ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਇਸ ਲਈ ਮਨਾਈ ਜਾਂਦੀ ਹੈ ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਇਹ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਸੱਭਿਆਚਾਰ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਬਹੁਤ ਨੇੜ੍ਹੇ ਤੋਂ ਜੁੜੀ ਹੋਈ ਹੈ।

ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਵਿੱਚ, ਸਾਰੇ ਪਾਪਾਂ ਦੀ ਜੜ੍ਹ ਇੱਕ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ ਦੇ ਹਉਮੈ ਅਤੇ ਦੁਸ਼ਟ ਭਾਵਨਾਵਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਇੱਛਾਵਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਮੰਨੀ ਜਾਂਦੀ ਹੈ। ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਜਾਣਬੁੱਝ ਕੇ “ਹੁਕਮ” (“ਇਸ਼ੁਰੀ ਕਾਇਦਾ” ਲਈ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਸ਼ਬਦ), ਜਾਂ ਨੈਤਿਕ ਕਨੂੰਨ ਦੀ ਉਲੰਘਣਾ ਨੂੰ ਇੱਕ ਪਾਪ ਸਮਝਦਾ ਹੈ।

ਪਾਪਾਂ ਦਾ ਪ੍ਰਾਸਚਿਤ ਕੇਵਲ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦਾ ਸਿਮਰਨ ਕਰਨ ਅਤੇ ਉਸ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਇੱਕ-ਸੂਰਤ ਹੋ ਜਾਣ ਦੀ ਕੋਸ਼ਿਸ਼ ਕਰਨ ਦੁਆਰਾ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਤ ਕੀਤਾ ਜਾ ਸੱਕਦਾ ਹੈ। ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਦੇ ਬਾਨੀ, ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਦੇਵ ਜੀ ਦੇ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ, “ਜਦੋਂ ਕਿਸੇ ਦੀ ਬੁੱਧ ਪਾਪ ਤੋਂ ਪਲੀਤ ਜਾਂ ਮਲੀਨ ਹੋ ਜਾਂਦੀ ਹੈ, ਤਾਂ ਇਹ ਕੇਵਲ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰੇਮ ਦੁਆਰਾ ਹੀ ਸਾਫ਼ ਹੋ ਸੱਕਦੀ ਹੈ।”

ਮੁੱਢਲੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਸ੍ਰੋਤ ਪ੍ਰਾਸਚਿਤ (ਕਫ਼ਾਰੇ) ਦੇ ਹੋਰ ਰੂਪਾਂ ਬਾਰੇ ਕੁੱਝ ਨਹੀਂ ਬੋਲਦੇ ਹਨ ਜਿਹੜੇ ਪਾਪੀ ਜਾਂ ਅਪਰਾਧੀ ਨੂੰ ਉਸ ਸਮਾਜ ਵਿੱਚ ਰਹਿਣ ਲਈ ਕਰਨੇ ਪੈਂਦੇ ਸੀ, ਜਿਸ ਤੋਂ ਉਹ ਸਬੰਧਤ ਸੀ। ਪ੍ਰਾਸਚਿਤ ਦੀ ਸੋਚ ਪੂਰੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਇਤਹਾਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਵਿਕਸਿਤ ਹੁੰਦੀ ਰਹੀ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਇਸ ਸੋਚ ਨੂੰ [ਪਹਿਲੀ ਵਾਰ] ਦਸਵੇਂ ਸਿੱਖ ਗੁਰੂ, ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਦੁਆਰਾ, ਆਪਣੇ ਲਈ ਬਣਾਇਆ ਗਿਆ ਖਾਲਸਾ (ਉਨਾਂ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਅਰੰਭ ਕੀਤੇ ਯੋਧਿਆਂ ਦਾ ਧਾਰਮਿਕ ਸਮਾਜ) ਲਈ ਉਪਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਦੇ ਰੂਪ ਵਿੱਚ ਵਿੱਚ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਸੀ।

ਇਹ ਹੁਕਮ 18ਵੀਂ ਅਤੇ 20ਵੀਂ ਸਦੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਸੋਧੇ ਗਏ ਸਨ ਅਤੇ ਅੱਜ ਮੁੱਖ ਤੌਰ 'ਤੇ ਨਿਜੀ ਅਤੇ ਉਹ ਵੱਖ-ਵੱਖ ਤਰੀਕਿਆਂ 'ਤੇ ਧਿਆਨ ਕੇਂਦ੍ਰਤ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ ਜਿਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਇੱਕ ਸਿੱਖ ਨੂੰ ਇੱਕ ਚੰਗਾ, ਪਾਪ ਤੋਂ ਬਗੈਰ ਸਿੱਖ ਬਣਨ ਲਈ ਵਿਹਾਰ ਕਰਨਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ।

ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਵਿੱਚ, ਪ੍ਰਾਸਚਿਤ ਨੂੰ ਸਮਾਜ ਵਿੱਚ ਸੰਖੇਪ ਰੂਪ ਵਿੱਚ ਦਰਸਾਇਆ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਇਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਸੇਵਾ ਸ਼ਾਮਲ ਹੋਣੀ ਚਾਹੀਦੀ ਹੈ।

ਇਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਅਪਵਾਦ ਚਾਰ ਵੱਡੇ ਪਾਪ ਹਨ: ਹੁੱਕਾ (ਤੰਬਾਕੂ ਖਾਣਾ ਅਤੇ ਹੋਰ ਸਾਰੇ ਨਸ਼ੀਲੇ ਪਦਾਰਥਾਂ ਦੀ ਵਰਤੋਂ ਕਰਨਾ), ਹਜਾਮਤ (ਵਾਲ ਮੁੰਨਵਾਉਣਾ), ਹਲਾਲ (ਮਾਸ ਖਾਣਾ), ਅਤੇ ਹਰਾਮ (ਵਿਆਹ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਹਰ ਵਿਭਚਾਰ ਕਰਨਾ ਅਤੇ ਸਰੀਰਕ ਸਬੰਧ ਬਣਾਉਂਣਾ)। ਇਹਨਾਂ ਦੀ ਉਲੰਘਣਾ ਕਰਨ ਤੇ ਅਪਰਾਧੀ ਨੂੰ ਸਮਾਜ ਵਿੱਚ ਦਾਖਲ ਹੋਣ ਲਈ ਮੁੜ-ਸ਼ੁਰੂਆਤ ਦੀ ਲੋੜ ਹੋ ਸੱਕਦੀ ਹੈ।

ਰਿਚਰਡ ਹਾੱਵੇਲ, ਪੀਐਚਡੀ (ਮਸੀਹੀ ਧਰਮ-ਵਿਗਿਆਨ) ਅਤੇ ਕਾਲੇਬ ਇੰਸਟੀਚਿਊਟ, ਦਿੱਲੀ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸੀਪਲ। ਇੰਨਾਂ ਦਾ ਜਨਮ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੋਇਆ ਅਤੇ ਇੰਨਾਂ ਦਾ ਪਾਲਣ-ਪੋਸ਼ਣ ਵੀ ਉੱਥੇ ਹੀ ਹੋਇਆ ਅਤੇ ਇੰਨਾ ਦੇ ਜੀਵਨ ਦਾ ਇੱਕ ਮਹੱਤਵਪੂਰਣ ਹਿੱਸਾ ਉੱਥੇ ਖੁਸ਼ਖਬਰੀ ਦਾ ਪ੍ਰਚਾਰ ਕਰਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਬਤੀਤ ਹੋਇਆ ਹੋ।

ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਕਰਮ ਨੂੰ ਆਪਣੀ ਹੋਂਦ ਲਈ ਚੰਗੇ ਅਤੇ ਮਾੜੇ ਕੰਮਾਂ ਦੇ ਕੁੱਲ ਜੋੜ ਵਜੋਂ ਪਰਿਭਾਸ਼ਤ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ ਜੋ ਕਿਸੇ ਦੇ ਭਵਿੱਖ ਨੂੰ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵਤ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਇਹ ਇੱਕ “ਉੱਤਾਂਹ ਵੱਲ” ਕੀਤੇ ਜਾਣ ਵਾਲਾ ਰਿਸ਼ਤਾ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ, ਇਸ ਲਈ ਇੱਕ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ ਦਾ ਪਾਪ ਇੱਕ ਪਵਿੱਤਰ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ, ਸਗੋਂ ਇਹ “ਲੰਬਕਾਰੀ” ਹੈ, ਅਰਥਾਤ ਜਿਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਉਹ ਦੂਜੇ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਆਪ ਤੋਂ ਸੰਬਧਤ ਹੈ। ਸਿੱਟੇ ਵੱਜੋਂ ਇਸ ਦੇ ਨਤੀਜੇ ਕੀ ਨਿੱਕਲਦੇ ਹਨ। ਕਰਮ ਇਹ ਨਿਰਧਾਰਤ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਅਗਲੇ ਜਨਮ ਵਿੱਚ ਉਸ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ ਦੀ ਆਤਮਾ ਨਾਲ ਕੀ ਵਾਪਰਦਾ ਹੈ, ਭਾਵੇਂ ਉਹ ਪੌੜੀ ਉੱਤੇ ਚੜ੍ਹਦਾ ਹੈ ਜਾਂ ਹੇਠਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਆਉਂਦਾ ਹੈ। ਪੁਨਰ-ਜਨਮ (ਮੌਤ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਇੱਕ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ ਦੀ ਆਤਮਾ ਦਾ ਇੱਕ ਸਰੀਰ ਤੋਂ ਦੂਜੇ ਸਰੀਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਜਾਣਾ) ਵਿੱਚ ਅੱਗੇ ਵਧਣ ਲਈ, ਇੱਕ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ ਦੇ ਚੰਗੇ ਕੰਮ ਮਾੜੇ ਕੰਮਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਵੱਧ ਹੋਣੇ ਚਾਹੀਦੇ ਹਨ।

ਅੱਗ ਦੇ ਆਲੇ-ਦੁਆਲੇ ਘੁੰਮਣ ਅਤੇ “ਤਿੱਲ੍ਹ ਸੜੇ, ਪਾਪ ਸੜੇ/ਝੜੇ” ਦੇ ਜਾਪ ਦੀ ਲੋਹੜੀ ਵਾਲੀ ਪ੍ਰੰਪਰਾ ਦੋਸ਼ ਦੀ ਮੌਜੂਦਗੀ ਦੇ ਸਬੂਤ ਵੱਲ੍ਹ ਇਸ਼ਾਰਾ ਕਰ ਸੱਕਦੀ ਹੈ। ਤਿੱਲ੍ਹ ਨੂੰ ਅੱਗ ਵਿੱਚ ਸਾੜਨਾ, ਇੱਕ ਪਾਸੇ ਤਾਂ, ਪਛਤਾਵੇ ਨੂੰ ਵਿਖਾਉਣ ਵਾਲਾ ਪ੍ਰਗਟਾਵਾ ਅਤੇ ਇਹ ਅਹਿਸਾਸ ਹੋ ਸੱਕਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਕੁੱਝ ਗਲਤ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ, ਪਰ ਦੂਜੇ ਪਾਸੇ, ਇਹ ਸਿਰਫ਼ ਚੰਗੇ ਕੰਮਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਵਧਾਉਣ ਵਾਲਾ ਕੰਮ ਵੀ ਹੋ ਸੱਕਦਾ ਹੈ।

ਮਸੀਹੀ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਵਿੱਚ, ਪਾਪ ਨੂੰ ਨਾ ਸਿਰਫ਼ ਅਗਿਆਨਤਾ ਵਜੋਂ ਸਮਝਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ, ਸਗੋਂ ਇੱਕ ਪਵਿੱਤਰ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਅੱਗੇ ਮਨੁੱਖ ਦੇ ਦੋਸ਼ੀ ਹੋਣ ਦੇ ਰੂਪ ਵਿੱਚ ਵੀ ਸਮਝਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ। ਮਨੁੱਖ ਨੇ ਉਸ ਦੇ ਹੁਕਮ ਦੀ ਉਲੰਘਣਾ ਕੀਤੀ ਅਤੇ ਉਸ ਤੋਂ ਆਪਣੀ ਅਜ਼ਾਦੀ ਦਾ ਐਲਾਨ ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤਾ। ਇਹੋ ਪਾਪ ਹੈ, ਅਤੇ ਇਹ ਅਣਆਗਿਆਕਾਰ ਦੇ ਕਾਰਨ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੇ ਜੀਵਨ ਤੋਂ ਵੱਖ ਹੋਣ ਦਾ ਨਤੀਜਾ ਵੀ ਹੈ।

ਯਿਸੂ ਸਾਨੂੰ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਇੱਕ ਮੇਲ ਵਿੱਚ ਆਉਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਰਿਸ਼ਤੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਵਾਪਸ ਲਿਆਉਂਦਾ ਹੈ, ਅਤੇ ਅਜਿਹਾ ਉਸ ਦੇ ਦੇਹਧਾਰਣ ਤੋਂ ਸ਼ੁਰੂ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਜਦੋਂ ਇਸ਼ੁਰੱਤ ਮਨੁੱਖਤਾਈ ਨਾਲ ਇੱਕ ਹੋ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ। ਯਿਸੂ ਮਸੀਹ ਦੇ ਬਲੀਦਾਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਸਾਡਾ ਇਕਰਾਰ ਸਾਨੂੰ ਸਿੱਟੇ ਵੱਜੋਂ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਤੋਂ ਦੁਬਾਰਾ ਮਿਲਾਉਂਦਾ ਹੈ। ਸਾਨੂੰ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੀ ਕਿਰਪਾ ਦੇ ਸਿੱਟੇ ਵੱਜੋਂ ਮੁਆਫ਼ੀ ਦਾ ਅਨੁਭਵ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ।

ਜਿਤੇਂਦਰ ਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ, ਸਾਬਕਾ ਸਿੱਖ ਗ੍ਰੰਥੀ ਅਤੇ ਐਮ੍ਬੈਸਡਰ੍ਜ਼ ਫਾੱਰ ਕ੍ਰਾਇਸ੍ਟ ਦੇ ਸਾਬਕਾ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰੀ ਪ੍ਰਚਾਰਕ, ਹਰਿਆਣਾ।

ਤਿੱਲ੍ਹ ਦੀ ਮਠਿਆਈ ਨੂੰ ਅੱਗ ਵਿੱਚ ਸੁੱਟਣਾ ਇੱਕ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਪੂਰੇ ਸਾਲ ਵਿੱਚ ਕੀਤੇ ਗਏ ਪਾਪਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਦਰਸਾਉਂਦਾ ਹੈ, ਅਤੇ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਛੁੱਟਕਾਰਾ ਮਿਲਦਾ ਹੈ। ਇਹ ਕੰਮ ਸਾਲ ਦਰ ਸਾਲ ਕੀਤਾ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਸਾਰੀ ਉਮਰ ਚੱਲਦਾ ਰਹਿੰਦਾ ਹੈ।

ਪਰ ਅਜਿਹਾ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਨਾਲ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਜਿਹੜੇ ਮਸੀਹ ਯਿਸੂ ਵਿੱਚ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਮਸੀਹ ਨੇ ਸਾਡੇ ਪਾਪਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਆਪਣੇ ਉੱਤੇ ਲੈ ਲਿਆ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਸਾਨੂੰ “ਇੱਕ ਵਾਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਅਤੇ ਹਮੇਸ਼ਾ ਲਈ” ਅਜ਼ਾਦ ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਹਰ ਸਾਲ, ਵਾਰੀ-ਵਾਰੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਦੁਹਰਾਇਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ। ਮਸੀਹ ਹਰੇਕ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ ਨੂੰ ਇੱਕ ਸਵੈ-ਇੱਛਾ ਵਾਲਾ ਅਧਿਕਾਰ ਦਿੰਦਾ ਹੈ। ਜੇ ਅਸੀਂ ਆਪਣੇ ਪਾਪਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਅਜਾਦ ਹੋਣਾ ਚਾਹੁੰਦੇ ਹਾਂ, ਤਾਂ ਸਾਨੂੰ ਮਸੀਹ ਵੱਲ ਮੁੜ੍ਹਨ ਦੀ ਚੋਣ ਕਰਨੀ ਚਾਹੀਦੀ ਹੈ। ਅਤੇ ਇਹ ਸਿਰਫ਼ ਇੱਕੋ ਵਾਰ ਵਾਲਾ ਕੰਮ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਦੁਹਰਾਉਣ ਦੀ ਲੋੜ੍ਹ ਨਹੀਂ। ਇਸ ਦੇ ਲਈ ਕੋਈ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਨਿਰਧਾਰਤ ਸ਼ਰਤ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ, ਅਤੇ ਜੇਕਰ ਅਸੀਂ ਇਸ ਦੀ ਬਜਾਏ ਕਿਸੇ ਹੋਰ ਨੂੰ ਚੁਣਦੇ ਹਾਂ, ਤਾਂ ਅਸੀਂ ਹਮੇਸ਼ਾ ਲਈ ਆਪਣੇ ਪਾਪ ਦੇ ਭਾਰ ਨੂੰ ਚੁੱਕੀ ਰੱਖਾਂਗੇ।

ਸੰਤਾਰ ਸਿੰਘ, ਸੀਨੀਅਰ ਪਾਸਟਰ, ਖੁਸ਼ ਖਬਰੀ ਫੈਲੋਸ਼ਿਪ, ਸਿੰਗਾਪੁਰ। ਇਹ ਇੱਕ ਸਿੱਖ ਪੈਦਾ ਹੋਏ ਸਨ, ਪਰ ਬਾਅਦ ਵਿੱਚ ਇੱਕ ਮਸੀਹੀ ਬਣ ਗਏ ਅਤੇ ਸਿੰਗਾਪੁਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਅਸੈਂਬਲੀ ਆੱਫ਼ ਗੌਡ ਬਾਈਬਲ ਕਾਲਜ ਵਿੱਚ ਪੜ੍ਹੇ। ਇੰਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੀ ਚਰਚ ਵਿੱਚ, ਵਿਸ਼ੇਸ਼ ਤੌਰ 'ਤੇ ਪੰਜਾਬੀਆਂ ਲਈ ਅਰਾਧਨਾ ਸਭਾ ਚਲਾਈ ਜਾਂਦੀ ਹੈ।

ਪਾਪ ਦੇ ਬਾਰੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਸਮਝ ਪਾਪ ਦੀ ਮਸੀਹੀ ਸਮਝ ਤੋਂ ਬਹੁਤ ਜਿਆਦਾ ਵੱਖਰੀ ਹੈ। ਸਿੱਖ ਇਹ ਨਹੀਂ ਮੰਨਦੇ ਹਨ ਕਿ ਪਾਪ ਉਹਨਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਵਿਰਸੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਮਿਲਿਆ ਹੈ, ਇਹ ਮਸੀਹੀ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਦੇ ਉਲਟ ਹੈ, ਜਿਹੜੇ ਇਹ ਮੰਨਦੇ ਹਨ ਕਿ ਉਹ ਪਾਪ ਵਿੱਚ ਪੈਦਾ ਹੋਏ ਹਨ ਅਤੇ ਆਤਮਿਕ ਤੌਰ ਤੇ ਮੋਏ ਹੋਏ ਹਨ। ਸਿੱਖ ਇਹ ਨਹੀਂ ਮੰਨਦੇ ਕਿ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਸੁਭਾਅ ਪਾਪ ਹੈ; ਉਹ ਮੰਨਦੇ ਹਨ ਕਿ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਕੰਮ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਪਾਪੀ ਬਣਾਉਂਦੇ ਹਨ। ਮਸੀਹੀ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਵਿੱਚ, ਇੱਕ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ ਇਸ ਲਈ ਪਾਪੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਉਹ ਇੱਕ ਪਾਪ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ; ਉਹ ਪਾਪ ਇਸ ਲਈ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਉਹ ਇੱਕ ਪਾਪੀ ਹੈ। ਜੋ ਮਨੁੱਖ ਦੇ ਅੰਦਰ ਹੈ ਉਹੋ ਬਾਹਰ ਪ੍ਰਗਟ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ।

ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਦੇਵ ਜੀ, ਦਸ ਸਿੱਖ ਗੁਰੂਆਂ ਵਿੱਚੋਂ ਪਹਿਲੇ ਅਤੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਦੇ ਬਾਨੀ, ਨੇ ਤਿੰਨ ਥੰਮ੍ਹ (ਅਰਥਾਤ ਫਰਜ਼ਾਂ) ਨੂੰ ਰਸਮੀ ਰੂਪ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਜੋ ਉਹਨਾਂ ਦੇ ਪਿੱਛੇ ਚੱਲਣ ਵਾਲਿਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਮੁਕਤੀ : ਪ੍ਰਾਪਤ ਕਰਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਮਦਦ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ: ਨਾਮ ਜਪੋ (ਰੱਬ ਦਾ ਸਿਮਰਨ ਕਰਨਾ ਅਤੇ ਧਿਆਨ ਕਰਨਾ ਅਤੇ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੇ ਨਾਮ ਦਾ ਜਾਪ ਕਰਨਾ), ਕਿਰਤ ਕਰੋ (ਮਿਹਨਤ ਅਤੇ ਇਮਾਨਦਾਰੀ ਨਾਲ ਜੀਉਣ ਬਤੀਤ ਕਰਨਾ), ਅਤੇ ਵੰਡ ਛੱਕਣਾ (ਭਾਵ ਭੋਜਨ ਅਤੇ ਪੈਸਾ ਇਕੱਠੇ ਸਾਂਝਿਆਂ ਕਰਨਾ)।

ਮਸੀਹੀ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਜੋ ਕੁੱਝ ਅਫ਼ਸੀਆਂ 2: 8-9 ਵਿੱਚ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ, ਉਸ ਉੱਤੇ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ: “ਕਿਉਂ ਜੋ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਕਿਰਪਾ ਤੋਂ ਨਿਹਚਾ ਦੇ ਰਾਹੀਂ ਬਚਾਏ ਗਏ ਅਤੇ ਇਹ ਤੁਹਾਡੀ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਨਹੀਂ, ਇਹ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੀ ਬਖ਼ਸ਼ੀਸ਼ ਹੈ। ਇਹ ਕਰਨੀਆਂ ਤੋਂ ਨਹੀਂ ਅਜਿਹਾ ਨਾ ਹੋਵੇ ਭਈ ਕੋਈ ਘੁਮੰਡ ਕਰੇ।” ਅਸੀਂ ਕਰਮਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਨਹੀਂ ਰੱਖਦੇ; ਅਸੀਂ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੀ ਕਿਰਪਾ ਅਤੇ ਮਸੀਹ ਦੇ ਮੁਕੰਮਲ ਕੀਤੇ ਹੋਏ ਕੰਮ ਵਿੱਚ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਾਂ।

ਮੂਲ ਲੇਖ ਦੀ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਤੀ ਥਾਂ

Editor’s note: What do you think of this translation? Want to see CT do more? Interested in helping us improve the quality and quantity? Share your feedback here.


You can also now follow our best articles on our Telegram channel. Come join us!

Ideas

The Half-Truths We’ve Told About MLK

Contributor

In the ’60s, white evangelicals condemned Martin Luther King Jr. In the ’80s, we lauded a convenient, hagiographic version of his life. How should we remember him now?

Christianity Today January 12, 2024
Illustration by Elizabeth Kaye / Source Images: Wikimedia Commons

As the white editors of Christianity Today surveyed Martin Luther King Jr.’s nonviolent civil disobedience on behalf of civil rights in the summer of 1964, they were not impressed. “For preachers to argue that ‘civil disobedience’ is justified helps to encourage those who would resort to violence,” CT declared that August.

A half century later, CT formally apologized for its opposition to King and the civil rights movement. By then, the magazine had published numerous pieces lauding King as an example of Christian love whose words and actions offered a needed call to repentance for white evangelicals.

But King remains an awkward figure for those of us who are both white and evangelical—two things that King was not. Many of us would like to herald him as a prophet, but when we do, we risk co-opting King for our own purposes rather than understanding him on his own terms.

White American evangelicals have typically reacted to King in one of three ways: (1) criticizing his Christian practice as heretical or hypocritical; (2) heralding him as a prophet of love whose teachings can heal our racial divisions and cleanse us of the sin of racism; or (3) highlighting his commitment to nonviolence and an alleged colorblind American ideal as an alternative to more militant forms of Black nationalism.

There is at least some truth in every one of these three reactions to King—but in each case, white evangelicals have frequently gone too far. In each case, we have too often tried to fit King into our own evangelical categories instead of understanding him on his own terms.

King’s non-evangelical Christian theology

King was not an evangelical. Evangelicals have traditionally seen the answer to the problem of sin primarily in individual conversion. This was the message of the 18th- and 19th-century revivalists, and it was the message of Billy Graham in the 20th century.

But King understood sin primarily in structural terms. From the time that he was first conscious of the world around him until the day he died, King’s life was shaped by the structural reality of racial segregation—a legal, social, and cultural system that refused to treat him with full human dignity simply because of his skin color. King viewed his call to the ministry not primarily as a call to save souls for the afterlife but as a call to bring the kingdom of God to bear on an evil system that did not treat people as people.

The ultimate way to overcome evil was through the power of the cross—but not the cross of Christ’s judicial atonement, as white evangelicals believed, but the cross of collective “unearned suffering.” Nonviolent activism could expose the evils of structural injustice and bring about a national repentance as the broader public was moved by the sight of seeing oppressed people showing love toward their oppressors.

King was neither the first nor the last to preach this message, but he was more effective than most, partly because his view of Christianity and American democracy appealed not only to African American Christians but also to many white liberals. Unlike the early 20th-century Black nationalist Marcus Garvey or King’s contemporary Malcolm X, King grounded his calls for racial justice in the nation’s founding documents—the Declaration of Independence’s assertion that “all men are created equal” and the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

He also grounded his principles of racial equality, human dignity, and nonviolent activism against injustice in the parts of the Bible that held the greatest appeal for white liberal Protestants: the Sermon on the Mount, the parable of the Good Samaritan, the Golden Rule, and the biblical prophetic tradition.

To many white liberal Christians, King’s message of love and justice—especially backed by his willingness to go to jail and risk his life for his beliefs—seemed to be a perfect reflection of the version of the social gospel and the tenets of American democracy that they already believed, even if they had sometimes applied these principles inconsistently on matters of race. They lauded King as a modern prophet and put him on the editorial masthead at The Christian Century, the leading liberal Protestant magazine of the time.

White evangelical Christians found King’s message far more objectionable. King’s views of the Bible, conversion, and the Atonement did not match their theology. Nor did his political views coincide with theirs. To most white evangelicals, international communism was one of the greatest threats to religious freedom, and they therefore supported the Vietnam War and America’s Cold War mission.

King, as a pacifist and Christian socialist who was often critical of the US government, opposed the Vietnam War and engaged in a campaign of nonviolent civil disobedience—a campaign that Christianity Today and Billy Graham denounced. They believed it would potentially undermine America’s anti-communist mission and thought that it violated the New Testament’s requirement for Christians to submit to governing authorities.

White evangelical repentance

It took a long time after his death for most white evangelicals to fully make peace with King. In the late 1960s and 1970s, some young evangelical progressives who wanted to make racial reconciliation a central priority for the evangelical movement venerated King, but many conservative evangelicals ignored him. Not until the late 1980s did Christianity Today magazine begin regularly publishing hagiographic retrospectives on King.

When conservative evangelicals rediscovered King in the late 20th century, they began using his historical memory as a way to call white evangelicals to repentance for the sin of individual racism. The reason, they said, white evangelicals (including themselves) had opposed King in the 1960s was that they’d had racist attitudes. But in retrospect, they saw the light and realized that King was the true Christian while they themselves had been the Pharisaical sinners.

This repentance was undoubtedly genuine and sorely needed, but it was also based on at least a partial misunderstanding of King. His message was primarily social rather than individual, and his goal was to transform American democracy and lead African Americans to the promised land—not merely to heal white Christians’ hearts so that they could begin worshiping at multiracial churches.

Some of the white Christians who now lauded King—such as Jerry Falwell, who in 1988 called King “everybody’s American hero”—also supported then-president Ronald Reagan’s Cold War nuclear arms buildup and opposed the presidential campaign of Jesse Jackson, the civil rights leader who had been King’s associate. It is highly unlikely that King would have approved of these white evangelical political stances had he lived long enough to see them. And white evangelicals likely would’ve been far less approving of King were he still alive in the late 1980s and championing causes similar to the ones Jackson endorsed.

In attributing their prior rejection of King to past racist sins for which they had now repented, some of the white evangelicals who adopted King as a prophetic hero failed to fully grapple with the theological distance between King’s message and their own.

It wasn’t merely hatred of Black people or opposition to racial integration that had prompted evangelicals in the 1960s to repudiate King; it was profound differences in theological and political orientation. Those differences were as wide as ever in the 1980s and 1990s, but now that King was dead, it was easy for white evangelicals to ignore them.

The King that they now heralded was a mythical King who was far more evangelical and conservative than he ever had been in real life.

King as conservative hero

At the very moment that white evangelicals were beginning to rediscover King, many younger African Americans and white liberals were starting to distance themselves from him. The release of Spike Lee’s film Malcolm X in 1992 popularized Malcolm’s Black nationalism for a younger generation of African Americans who were tired of seeing white people herald Martin Luther King Jr. as an example of nonviolent Black passivity.

PBS’s landmark documentary series Eyes on the Prize (1987) and Taylor Branch’s Pulitzer Prize–winning book Parting the Waters: America in the King Years, 1954–63 (1988) represented the high-water mark for hagiographic treatments of King from American historians.

After the late 1980s, depictions of King became more critical, with historians much more likely to note his condescending (or even abusive) treatment of women and his conflicts with younger activists. These new histories suggested the most courageous people in the struggle were actually local activists such as Fannie Lou Hamer and Bob Moses or Black Power advocates like Stokely Carmichael.

In this context, white conservative evangelicals doubled down on their appropriation of King, lauding him not only as a believing Christian (in contrast to Black Power radicals who were not) but also as a colorblind conservative whose dream of a world where people “will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character” offered an implicit critique of affirmative action. The fact that the real King supported affirmative action and democratic socialism during the final years of his life was lost on those who understood King only through his “I Have a Dream” speech.

Understanding King today

As a white evangelical Christian who is also an academic historian, I face three questions as I think about King: (1) How should I understand King as a historical figure, in the context of his own time and place? (2) How should my understanding of King affect my own understanding of Christian theology and the Bible? and (3) How should my understanding of King and Christian theology affect my response to issues of racial justice today?

The first question is the easiest to answer: King was a complicated figure, but it seems clear that his theological and political views differed substantially from those of white evangelicals both then or now. To understand King’s views, we have to understand the history of the Black social gospel, as theological historian Gary Dorrien has argued.

The second question is more uncomfortable: Does white evangelicalism’s resistance to the ethics of King show that we’ve gotten our theology wrong, and should we therefore become converts to the Black social gospel?

We need to choose our Christian theology based on our understanding of biblical truth, not merely on our attraction to a particular way of life or our admiration of a Christian principle in action. But whenever we find evidence that our own theological tradition hasn’t adequately rejected a given sin, like racism, we should identify the theological blind spots that kept our tradition from seeing that evil. We should adopt instead a theological corrective that includes not only our own understandings of the Bible but also whatever biblical truths we find in other Christian traditions, including King’s theology and the theology of other Black Christians.

Regardless of our understanding of King, we also need to answer the question of how we should respond to racial injustice today—and whether we should appeal to King’s words when we do so. Because it’s easy to quote King selectively or out of context, we need to be careful about using King to weigh in on current policy debates, especially if we’re tempted to use his words to argue against a particular form of Black activism.

At the same time, King’s example of active resistance to evil through nonviolent love is still just as inspirational as it was during his lifetime—it can still convict and inspire us, even if we might not agree with all his theological views. I appreciate the humility of the white Christians of the late 20th century who recognized that King’s attitudes were far more Christlike than theirs and who found in King an impetus to repent. Their historical understanding of King may have been incomplete in some cases, but their humility was laudable.

And so, on this 95th anniversary of King’s birth, I think we need to approach King with a similar humility. We need to realize that his story is not our own, and his understanding of the Christian faith was probably different from ours. He was a man of both deep flaws and profound insights. He was not the only civil rights hero or even the best one.

But he was deeply engaged with the Christian message of justice and reconciliation, and there is much we have yet to learn from his life as it was—not as we might wish or imagine it to be.

Daniel K. Williams teaches American history at Ashland University and is the author of The Politics of the Cross: A Christian Alternative to Partisanship.

Ideas

The Trump Debate Is Dead

Staff Editor

Evangelical elites of all political stripes still dispute Trump, but the question is largely settled at the grassroots.

Christianity Today January 12, 2024
Brandon Bell / Staff / Getty

Next week’s Iowa Republican caucuses formally launch the 2024 primary race that will almost certainly end with a third GOP nomination for former president Donald Trump. When Iowans caucus on Monday, recent polling suggests Trump will easily claim the state’s 40 delegates, with rivals Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis jostling for second place.

Whatever the exact results, the decisions of Iowa’s white evangelical caucus-goers will be much scrutinized in the days to come. But for most of them, I suspect, those decisions have been long since made. American evangelicals’ conversation around Trump has changed dramatically since 2020, splitting along a kind of class line and all but disappearing as an active consideration for the average voter.

In most evangelical circles, the Trump debate is dead.

Let’s start with the exception: Among what some call the “evangelical elite,” this is still a live question. Whether it’s permissible (or required) to support (or oppose) Trump for president is still actively discussed among evangelicals who write books and articles like this one, who attract followings online, who know what “Big Eva” means and how they feel about it, who attend seminary (but probably not for pastoral ministry), and who otherwise participate in The Discourse—wherever they land politically or theologically.

Trump support is a live question for self-proclaimed Christian nationalists on X (formerly Twitter). And it’s a live question for “never Trump” evangelicals at The Atlantic or The New York Times. In Iowa, it’s a live question for Republican kingmaker Bob Vander Plaats, who told CT he’s holding out hope for a DeSantis win.

But for the average white evangelical Republican, my strong impression is that this debate is basically finished. Very few evangelicals will vote or caucus this year having freshly agonized over whether to back Donald Trump.

That’s so for several reasons, none of them especially unique to evangelicals. One is the reality of how millions of Americans routinely vote: by partisan default and after relatively little research into the policy and personal history of the candidates on offer.

The raging politico who can’t seem to log off, touch grass, and love his neighbor has become a stock character in American politics. But there’s another character better represented in our democracy: the party-line voter (and sometimes nonvoter) who really does intend to do her civic duty but just has so much else to do first. There’s dinner to cook, laundry to sort, that email to answer, the dog to wash.

Low-information voters get a bad rap, and the part of me fascinated by politics is sometimes tempted to join in that denigration. But another part of me recognizes that this mode of political engagement makes sense for many people. After all, my job means I can spend a whole day researching a candidate’s record—and get paid for it. Probably 99.9 percent of America can’t do the same. People have limited time and energy, and they can’t spare much for distant political dramas, so they vote the party line.

That includes many evangelicals. Much has been made of “the 81 percent” of white evangelicals who voted for Trump in 2016. But, depending on exactly which data set you use, that figure is statistically identical to the proportion of white evangelical votes for the Republican nominees of 2020, 2012, 2008, and 2004. As difficult as it is for those of us in the chattering class to fathom, a lot of this story is simply Republicans voting Republican.

And for all the same reasons that people cast low-information votes, relatively few voters have comprehensive political ideologies to uphold. Default partisan voting doesn’t rest on an exhaustive policy platform undergirded by mutually reinforcing theses about the purpose of the state, the grounding of human rights, the nature of the common good, and so on. It rests on a few high-profile issues (right now: abortion, education, immigration, inflation, Israel, Ukraine) and, well, vibes.

In that sense, the evangelical decision to back Trump was at once a very big deal and a comparatively small one. It was big when done by evangelical elites—the kind of people who are still talking about this, who do have a political ideology supposedly informed by Scripture, who spent the 1990s putting out statements about the importance of character in politics and then forgot all about it when Trump came on the scene.

The Book of James warns us that those “who teach will be judged more strictly” (3:1), and high-profile Trump supporters knew better.

Yet many ordinary voters knew rather less. I’ll never forget mentioning Trump’s Access Hollywood tape to an older relative—a white evangelical Republican—shortly before the 2016 election. I said I couldn’t believe people still supported him after hearing what he’d said. She said she hadn’t heard of it at all. That was the first time I’d have an exchange about Trump along those lines. It wasn’t the last.

Political division feels worst when it’s close, when it comes between us and loved ones who taught us the very ethics that make enthusiasm for Trump inconceivable. But the “servant who knows the master’s will and does not get ready or does not do what the master wants will be beaten with many blows,” as Jesus taught, while “the one who does not know and does things deserving punishment will be beaten with few blows” (Luke 12:47–48).

Error is judged in proportion to knowledge, that is. And almost a decade into this saga, I’ve come to hold in tension a big-picture dismay over American evangelicalism’s embrace of Trump and a recognition that the rationale behind any one evangelical Trump vote may be complicated, surprising, and even sympathetic.

The final factor bringing the Trump debate to its close is sympathetic too, if only because it reflects a common human failing—one I too often find in myself: We don’t like to admit we’ve been wrong.

This factor isn’t about making the decision to back Trump, then, but about what happens after that decision has been made. It’s something of an ethical sunk cost fallacy: If you’ve voted for him once, why not again? If supporting him puts you in the wrong, you’re already there.

The tricky thing about sunk cost is that it doesn’t feel like a fallacy, and that’s especially true when we’re talking not business but politics, ethics, and their implications for personal identity. To refuse to vote for Trump in 2024 after voting for him in 2016 or 2020 is to admit error—and that’s uncomfortable.

Indeed, in the political realm, perhaps even more than elsewhere, the human instinct is to justify ourselves (Luke 10:29), to reassure ourselves and each other that we got it right the first time, to recommit even when we would do better to repent. Trump’s on the ballot anew for 2024. But who wants to keep debating a decision already made?

Bonnie Kristian is the editorial director of ideas and books at Christianity Today.

News

The Middle East’s Favorite Christmas Carol Is About War and Hate

Traditional melody suggests it is only when Christians realize the holiday comes with “hard realities” that the spirit of Nativity dwells in their hearts.

Christianity Today January 12, 2024
Illustration by Elizabeth Kaye / Source Images: Getty / Youtube

This past holiday season—like many before it—the Arab world’s favorite Christmas carol spoke directly to war and suffering.

With Orthodox Christians observing their 12 days of Christmastide from January 7–19, their churches in the Middle East were the latest to sing “Laylat al-Milad” (On Christmas Night). Written in the 1980s during Lebanon’s civil war, the song has been performed by classical divas, worship leaders, and children’s choirs alike. It has offered comfort during the regional conflicts since, from the Syrian civil war to ISIS’s reign of terror to the current war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

Its haunting melody and lyrics speak less about a baby in a manger than the life that baby demands that we live. And also of the life that baby makes possible:

Chorus: On Christmas night, hatred vanishes On Christmas night, the earth blooms On Christmas night, war is buried On Christmas night, love is born

Verse 1: When we offer a glass of water to a thirsty person, we are in Christmas When we clothe a naked person with a gown of love, we are in Christmas When we wipe the tears from weeping eyes, we are in Christmas When we cushion a hopeless heart with love, we are in Christmas

Verse 2: When I kiss a friend without hypocrisy, I am in Christmas When the spirit of revenge dies in me, I am in Christmas When hardness is gone from my heart, I am in Christmas When my soul melts in the being of God, I am in Christmas

The Christmas season in the Middle East can be a double blessing. Advent begins one month before the Catholic and Protestant holiday on December 25, while festivities continue weeks further until the Orthodox celebration on January 7 and its Epiphany on January 19. But this season, in sympathy with a muted Christmas in Gaza, Holy Land Christians canceled their public revelry.

Yet they still gathered to sing and worship in church.

In Israel’s northern town of Kafr Yasif, the Baptist church “kissed their friends” in congregational greeting as the praise band led a joyous rendition of “Laylat al-Milad.” In Amman, Jordan, an evangelical orphan ministry gathered around 300 Muslim and Christian at-risk children to celebrate, as the Baptist school choir serenaded their parents. And in Erbil in Iraq’s Kurdistan region, the Alliance church included the carol in a merry gathering of potluck fun and gift exchange.

The Syrian-born manager of Lebanon’s BeLight FM radio station said he played “Laylat al-Milad” at least once daily. And an Egyptian director of SAT-7, the Christian satellite TV network, called it a clear holiday favorite.

CT asked evangelical leaders in each location for their reflection on the seasonal standard:

George Makeen, ministry content consultant for SAT-7:

To get a sense of how this song resonates with Arab Christians, picture the end of World War I, when churches were full of people celebrating the end of conflict despite the destruction all around them. They knew the suffering was over and could anticipate the future rebuilding. But for us, we are fragile and see no way out of our situation. We ask: God, how long? But we don’t think it will end any time soon.

Yet in Christ, we celebrate anyway.

This song conveys the true meaning of Christmas. It reminds us of hard realities, and that as soon as we become aware of these realities—this is when we are most aware of Christmas.

This paradox is not what is usually heard in Christmas songs, but like everything else in our faith, the unbelievable is true. This is fitting because the original Christmas story was a hard reality. The boy whose birth was announced by angels flees to Egypt while a king slaughters babies.

I can’t remember a time in my life when the suffering was so bad. But if Gaza is an earthquake, the aftershocks will also be dangerous. What will happen with the wave of fanaticism to come? What impact will it have on continued economic stress in Egypt, Lebanon, and Sudan? And what about the collective trauma everywhere?

We expect more suffering to come.

But my favorite line in the song is “hatred vanishes, war is buried.” The baby that fled to Egypt died by crucifixion—yet in between, he preached love and hope and ultimately was resurrected. We try to give this message in our programming, but a song conveys it much more powerfully.

David Rihani, head of the Assemblies of God church in Jordan:

In Jordan, Christmas is an official holiday, and before canceling celebrations in solidarity with Gaza, the public squares and shopping malls were decorated festively. But with all this missing, the focus is squarely on Jesus. And this song, popular every Christmas, is the most popular by far.

Its message, stronger than any sermon—or UN resolution—has never been so clear.

This year, Jordanian kids cared much less about receiving presents. They know something is wrong in the world, overwhelmed by the media discussing the war 24/7. The images are of dying children and angry demonstrations. But while the news outside is all about suffering, our churches and halls have reverberated with youth choirs singing with passion, demonstrating their care for life and peace.

They have inspired me to speak more strongly to stop the war.

We tell our children that there is politics, and there are people. We are not to hate one another. We hate the war, but we must use this opportunity to connect with Jews and Muslims in pursuit of peace.

There need not be problems between Arabs and Israelis. Muslim empires protected Jews when they were oppressed in Europe. And historic Palestine had them as friends and neighbors. This song calls for tolerance, for peace, and reminds us, “the spirit of revenge dies in me.”

The more we connect, the fewer problems we will have.

Nour Botros, radio manager for Lighthouse Arab World’s Belight FM in Beirut, Lebanon:

I heard this song growing up in Syria, but it never resonated with me until Christmas 2013, when I fled the war and went to Lebanon. I didn’t know if I would ever see my family again, but the chorus—“war is buried, hatred vanishes”—was emotionally touching.

We were in civil war with the exact opposite reality, killing each other in hate. And I thought about celebrating Christmas far from home, yet with a hope that at Christmas we have the opportunity to love one another, just as God loves us. And even now, after 13 years of war in my country, any song about peace continues to touch my heart.

Syria has been craving love and peace.

Several years later at BeLight, I watched as we filmed a video clip of this song sung by special-needs children. Their voices were nothing like that of our classical Arabic singers. But it again it touched me, as the line states, “When hardness is gone from my heart, I am in Christmas.”

As a believer, meditating on this song reminds me what happened this holiday. Every person must come to understand its message, why Jesus was born and remains with us today. Even in war, this will give us the hope that we need.

Malath Baythoon, senior pastor of Erbil Alliance Church, Kurdistan Region of Iraq:

This is an amazing song, with a beautiful melody. It represents a new beginning—a new tree, new clothes as gifts, and, above all, a new heart. The baby Jesus brought this world the love of God, and as Iraqis we sing it at Christmas to help change our mood.

That is because this song does not represent reality at all.

In fact, it is the exact opposite. Israel and Gaza are at war. Russia and Ukraine are at war. Economic troubles are everywhere. And here in Kurdistan, there are constant tensions between different groups of people. It is not a confirmation of what actually happens at Christmas.

But if we sing this song as a prayer, it works. It can be true in our person-to-person and family-to-family relationships. It can be true in our churches. We want this season to be filled with love, but if you don’t know Jesus, you are drawn to war and hatred.

The song can be a reality in our hearts—we can only pray it will be true in our nations.

Rula Mansour, founder and director of Nazareth Center for Peace Studies and associate professor at Nazareth Evangelical College, Israel:

Our center has made this refrain—“Hatred vanishes, the Earth blooms, war is buried, love is born”—our motto for Christmas, reminding us that love, born from the womb of darkness, transcends borders with the power of creation and redemption.

It is through the acts of compassion, liberation, and healing illustrated in this song—offering water to the thirsty, clothing the naked, wiping the tears of those who weep—that God aims to bring about the restoration of human dignity. The church, his transformed community, displays these signs of the kingdom in the face of oppressive structures, as evidence of God’s new world.

In hope, we look beyond hardships and trust in God’s goodness and complete sovereignty over tragedy and injustice. Even if we cannot see the results now, God will complete our unfinished and imperfect work, bringing justice and righting all wrongs in his time.

We see “war buried” through the eyes of our faith.

And then, as followers of the Peacemaker and as coworkers with God, we earnestly tear down the walls that separate us, resisting evil with good and hatred with love, to pave the way for a brighter future. But it is when our “souls melt in the being of God,” as the song states, that his love moves us away from excluding to embracing the other, turning an enemy into a friend.

Only then can we become beacons of hope, conveying God’s presence to bring healing, comfort, justice, peace, and restoration—to the places, situations, and lives we touch. And this year especially, this song, like a prophetic melody, declares the transformative power of Christmas—with a call to action to “bury war.”

addApple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseellipseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squarefolderGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastprintremoveRSSRSSSaveSavesaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube