Church Life

MLK’s Epistle to the White Church Still Preaches

On the 60th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail, Christians are reminded of how much further we must go.

Christianity Today April 14, 2023
Illustration by Mallory Rentsch / Source Images: WikiMedia Commons

On Good Friday in 1963, eight white Alabama clergymen published an open letter in Birmingham calling for the Black community to cease their civil rights demonstrations.

These church leaders—from Methodist, Episcopal, Presbyterian, Baptist, Catholic, and Jewish traditions—advised that “when rights are consistently denied, a cause should be pressed in the courts and in negotiations among local leaders, and not in the streets.”

In response, Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. penned a timely message—beginning on the margins of newspapers and then on smuggled-in scraps of paper—not knowing the profound impact it would have for generations to come. His “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is said to be the most important document of the civil rights era, compared by some to Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence for its impactful call for social change.

Although the “separate but equal” segregation law had been struck down a decade earlier through the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education, some cities and states were resistant.

In Birmingham, one of the most segregated cities in America, notorious local safety commissioner Eugene “Bull” Connor and other white segregationists got a state judge to pass a temporary injunction banning all pro-integration activity. And after leading a peaceful march, King and other protesters were arrested.

From his cell, King made a compelling argument for the importance of peaceful, public protest in the pursuit of justice. He explained the four steps of nonviolent activism: collecting facts to determine whether injustice exists, negotiating with local officials to work toward just resolution, practicing restraint when actions are taken against you, and raising awareness to drive more effective negotiation.

King began his letter by expressing his solidarity with the Black community in Birmingham, which had gone through all of these steps only to be met with countless broken promises: “For years now I have heard the word ‘Wait!’ … This ‘Wait’ has almost always meant ‘Never.’ … ‘Justice too long delayed is justice denied.’”

He expressed his frustration and disappointment with two particular groups of people that often intersected: the white moderate and the white church.

Accusing the white moderate of caring more about “a negative peace which is the absence of tension” than “a positive peace which is the presence of justice,” King further explained that “shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.”

King also shared his “deep disappointment” at the complicity and complacency of the white church—a discontent that was possible only because of his deep love for the church, as a third-generation pastor raised in its pews. He contrasted believers in the early church—who were eager to transform immoral practices in their society—with the contemporary Christian church, which had become an “arch-supporter of the status quo” with its “silent and often vocal sanction of things as they are.”

He then posed a question that is still being asked today: “Is organized religion too inextricably bound to the status quo to save our nation and the world?”

Many pastors and members of white churches today use quotations from King in their sermons, writing, and social media posts. But if we are going to change power structures that perpetuate racial injustice, we must move from memorializing toward modeling King’s message and call to action.

As Esau McCaulley wrote in his piece for Martin Luther King Jr. Day last year, “If remembering King means anything, it involves a sanctified dissatisfaction with the status quo.”

In a 2021 Pew Research poll, over a year after the George Floyd protests, 65 percent of Black Americans reported that the renewed awareness of racial inequity did not have an impact on the lives of their community—compared to 2020, when 56 percent expected policy changes would improve Black people’s lives.

One problem is that some white communities, both Christian and non-Christian, are worried about their own marginalization and blind to the marginalization of others. Another issue is the ongoing lack of awareness of the ways racial and economic systems perpetuate injustice in communities of color.

When confronted, some will blame partisan politics for ineffective change. Political divisions have always caused people to hold fast to one side or another, even at the expense of violating the humanity of others. But silently staying somewhere in the middle and watching, hoping, or grieving is not a sufficient response for Christians. Instead, we must ensure justice in the courts so that all people are treated fairly.

As King wrote in his letter, “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

Injustice does not just happen, and it does not repair itself. If we want history to tell a different story of the white church, we must join the men and women working to repair the unjust systems in our country—especially those individuals who belong to the body of Christ.

During this Easter season, pastors from the Black church tradition are marching at state capitols, much like King did 60 years ago. They are working to ensure that all voices are heard; that books are not banned; that their history is not erased; that their right to vote is protected; that financial barriers to homeownership are removed; and that competitive wages, education, skills, and capital for wealth creation are available to all.

The Black community is not the only group in our country that faces injustice.

For instance, pastors from Latino evangelical churches in Florida are mobilizing to protect their own communities and churches from unjust policy proposals that would criminalize providing car rides and opening their homes to undocumented immigrants. Such a law would make it a felony to extend hospitality, whether one is aware of the person’s immigration status or not.

The fight for civil rights is not the story of the past; it remains very much alive today. Throughout history, it has never been just one issue at one time, in one location, affording one solution, march, mobilizing effort, or request. It has always been a series of necessary actions, spanning decades.

In all such matters, the white church needs to care enough to listen, learn from, and work toward a more proximate justice. In joining this effort, we better understand the prophet Amos, who bore witness and opposed the extreme injustices of his day when he cried, “Let justice roll on like a river, righteousness like a never-failing stream!” (5:24).

At the end of his letter, King reorients his personal disillusionment by recalling the “church within the church, … the true ekklesia and the hope of the world.” Regardless of its size, this group is composed of those who benefit from the status quo working alongside those who are impacted by injustice and unrighteousness. Their witness is what King calls “the spiritual salt that has preserved the true meaning of the gospel.”

The work of change has always been done by a remnant. And together, we can carve a “tunnel of hope through the dark mountain of disappointment” by picking up the mantles left by those who have gone before and working for justice today.

Michelle Ferrigno Warren is the president of Virago Strategies and helped found Open Door Ministries. She is the author of Join the Resistance: Step Into the Good Work of Kingdom Justice (IVP, 2022) and The Power of Proximity: Moving Beyond Awareness to Action (IVP, 2017).

Theology

The Evangelical Temptation to Prove Ourselves

Christians must deny the urge to posture, which comes from a place of insecurity.

Christianity Today April 13, 2023
Illustration by Mallory Rentsch / Source Images: Getty

This piece was adapted from Russell Moore’s newsletter. Subscribe here.

For a long time, I have feared that my fellow American evangelical Christians were yielding to the third temptation of Christ: to sacrifice integrity for the conquest of power. Yet over the past year, I’ve started wondering whether we’re falling for an entirely different temptation—the one we least understand and were least taught to withstand.

The Gospels tell us that right after Jesus’ baptism in the Jordan, the Spirit directed him into the wilderness where the Devil set before him three temptations (Matt. 4:1–11; Luke 4:1–13). One temptation was to turn stones into bread—to satisfy his own appetites at the Devil’s direction.

This was, of course, the primal temptation of humanity (Gen. 3:1–3). This one is easy enough for us to understand because all of us grapple with our appetites—some for food, some for sex, some for drink—in ways that can make those appetites ultimate.

Another of the temptations was that the Devil would give Jesus “all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor” (Matt. 4:8) if he would just become a momentary Satanist. (Spoiler alert: Jesus passed up this offer.)

Again, most of us can understand this one because almost everyone is tempted at some point to trade principles for power. For a few, that power is a position in the White House, but for many of us, it is the ability to get the last word at the family dining room tables in our homes or to get the best seats at the conference tables at our jobs.

That temptation is still at work and transcends almost every tribal boundary. Forms of Christianized Marxism often yield to this temptation by replacing a gospel of repentance and faith with merely subduing oppressive social structures. Christian nationalism does the same thing—replacing a faith of new birth with blood-and-soil cultural Christianity.

Even so, I’ve come to believe that the greatest temptation we face right now may be the one that seems the farthest from us.

It’s the second temptation in Matthew’s account and the last in Luke’s. The Devil took Jesus to Jerusalem “and had him stand on the highest point of the temple. ‘If you are the Son of God,’ he said, ‘throw yourself down from here’” (Luke 4:9). Satan even had a Scripture verse to go with this temptation—a passage from Psalm 91: “He will command his angels concerning you to guard you carefully; they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone” (Luke 4:10–11; Ps. 91:11–12).

Some of you reading this have indeed resisted the temptation to throw yourselves from high places. Many others of you have never faced even the thought of that. Yet in either case, you likely were never tempted to do so for the reason Jesus was—to force a visible sign that he was, in fact, “the Son of God.”

As he always did, Jesus recognized what was going on, of course. And in response, he cited a portion Deuteronomy 6:16, which reads in full, “Do not put the Lord your God to the test as you did at Massah.” What is this verse referring to?

The place was called “Massah and Meribah,” the Bible tells us, “because the Israelites quarreled and because they tested the Lord saying, ‘Is the Lord among us or not?’” (Ex. 17:7).

The people of Israel—the very ones God had delivered out of Egypt with parted waters and a pillar of fire—started fighting in a drought because they wondered whether God was really who he said he was: a God who went before and behind them. They asked Moses, “Why did you bring us up out of Egypt to make us and our children and livestock die with thirst?” (v. 3). They lost confidence, and they wanted a sign.

In Jesus’ day, the temple was more than just a tall building. It was the place in which God had promised to dwell. For the Anointed One to essentially ask “Is God among us or not?” at the temple would be quite a question indeed.

Had Jesus thrown himself from the temple, angels—maybe even twelve legions of them—would likely have rescued him. It would have tangibly verified to Jesus, in his humanity, what God told him at the waters of the Jordan: “You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased” (Luke 3:22).

Even more than that, the crowds below would have seen this happening. It would have publicly vindicated Jesus to the very people of the city where he would later be crucified. No one would have dared suggest that he was demon-possessed, a lunatic, a closet insurrectionist, or a covert collaborator with Rome. He would have proved himself to be the Anointed One of God.

Jesus would have forced a sign. And Jesus called that a sin.

In 2010, political scientist James Davison Hunter identified that the “distinguishing characteristic” of current political psychology is what Friedrich Nietzsche called “ressentiment.” Although it includes resentment, Hunter wrote, it goes beyond that to involve “a combination of anger, envy, hate, rage, and revenge as the motive of political action.”

The years since Hunter penned this have proven him right. Much of what passes for “political action” or even just “cultural engagement” is really about a sense of injury—more specifically a sense of humiliation: “You think you’re better than me, and I’ll prove you wrong.”

We want to be vindicated—in public. We don’t just want to win; we want to “own” whoever has mistreated or made fun of us. We want to be respected, to be affirmed, if for nothing else than to boost our numbers and our political power.

Most of the rest of the world can see this for what it is: a lack of confidence. We want to be proven right because we don’t remember who we are or why we’re here.

We’ve all heard of the proverbial rock star who snaps at a restaurant server or club bouncer, saying angrily, “Don’t you know who I am?” The rage behind that question often stems from the rock star’s fear that the answer is “No, who are you?”

Referring to the incidents at Massah and Meribah, God said through the psalmist that the Israelites “put me to the proof, though they had seen my work” (Ps. 95:9, ESV). They forgot who they were.

Jesus did not. He believed that he was exactly who his Father said he was: the beloved Son of God. So he did not need to clamor for immediate satisfaction of his appetites; his Father had fed with manna before and would do it again. He did not need to grasp for immediate power over the nations; he would receive this not instead of humiliation but through it (Phil. 2:5–11).

When we forget the story the Bible tells us—the one it includes us in—we start seeing our audience as whatever mob or strongman will protect or respect us. When we forget about the judgment seat of Christ, we want a judgment seat now. We want to be proven right, now.

God would prove Jesus’ anointing not by vindication but by resurrection (Rom. 1:3–4). But even then, Jesus did not need to prove himself.

As New Testament scholar Richard Hays points out, the risen Christ “did not appear in the Temple and chastise his opponents; he did not appear to Pilate or in Rome to Caesar.” The Resurrection appearances were not a “how do you like me now?” tour to those who didn’t believe or respect him. Instead, he appeared to his followers—to the women at the tomb, to the men on the boats, to the gathered little flock on the mountain.

Even when faltering Thomas demanded to see the wounds of crucifixion and Jesus graciously accommodated him, the little band that would turn the world upside down left the room not to prove themselves right but to bear witness to something real—to Someone alive. Their words were not “Is God among us or not?” but “My Lord and my God!” (John 20:28).

What if we did the same? What if we were a church so confident in our own identity in Christ that, at long last, we had nothing to prove but something to give—life and rest, joy and peace?

Russell Moore is the editor in chief at Christianity Today and leads its Public Theology Project.

Theology

Water, Water Everywhere: How Christians View Thailand’s Water Festival

During Songkran, Christians find parallels in honoring their elders but point to the living water.

Christianity Today April 13, 2023
Illustration by Mallory Rentsch / Source Images: Getty

This is the third article in the Engaging Buddhism series, which explores different facets of Buddhism and how Christians can engage with and minister to Buddhists.

For the first time since the pandemic began, the massive water fights of Songkran have returned to Thailand’s streets. Taking place during the hottest week of the year, children and adults spray each other with colorful plastic water guns. People stand in the back of truck beds and use buckets to fling water and ice at neighboring trucks. Motorcycle drivers squint to see through the deluge—which often comes at them from multiple directions—while their passengers soak as many people as can as they pass.

Water—and lots of it—replaces fireworks in Songkran, Thailand’s new year celebration, held April 13–15. The holiday is also celebrated in Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, and several other regions that follow the Buddhist calendar. According to Buddhist tradition, water symbolizes ritual cleansing, righting last year’s wrongs, and welcoming the clean slate of a new year.

Beyond the raucous water fights on the streets, Thai Buddhists visit temples during Songkran to pour water over statues of Buddha and the hands of monks. This symbolic act is believed to atone for sins, bring purification, and make merit (gain good karma by performing good deeds). Worshipers also bring food for monks to make merit.

Spending time with family is also integral to Songkran. During the holiday, Thais travel across the nation to visit their family and strengthen familial bonds as they move toward the new year. They also pay respect to their elders and seek their blessing by pouring water over their hands. People exchange floral garlands made of jasmine, roses, and white champaca (flowers similar to magnolias).

Thai Christians differ from their countrypeople in their participation of Songkran because of the holiday’s Buddhist roots and because of the drinking and partying that have become associated with it. Yet Thai pastors see Songkran as an opportunity to show the wider Thai society that Christians also honor their elders, even if they don’t participate in certain Buddhist rituals.

“We show respect to family—our father, mother, or elders—which is a beautiful picture, and it is something that honors God,” said Chukiat Chaiboonsiri, the pastor of Creation Church Chiang Mai.

CT spoke to three Christians in Chiang Mai province in northern Thailand—Chaiboonsiri; Goi Manasakulpong, pastor of Creator Church in Hang Dong District; and Dream Waiwang, a former missionary—about how they view the holiday and the gospel opportunities they see during the celebration.

Thailand’s giant water fight

Songkran originated from a Hindu festival in India welcoming a new harvest season. Derived from the Sanskrit word sankranti, which refers to the movement of the sun from one position to another in the zodiac, it marks the new year according to the solar calendar. From 1888 to 1940, Songkran was Thailand’s official new year before it was moved to January 1.

The traditional custom of pouring water on Buddha, monks, and elders later extended to splashing friends and family with buckets of water to keep cool and as a sign of respect. While len nam, or playing and throwing water, has been a component of the holiday for generations, the rise of tourism and social media has brought Thailand’s water festivities into the international spotlight in recent years. Tourists from around the world throng to the country to join in the celebrations.

Chaiboonsiri, 48, believes Christians should not venture into the busy areas during Songkran for both their physical and their spiritual safety. Motorcycle and car accidents spike during Songkran due to drunk driving, speeding, and reckless driving. The revelry can also lead to temptations for Christians, as many people get drunk and start fights.

He said Christians should not go where “we are spiritually enticed and our life is threatened.”

On the other hand, 35-year-old Waiwang, who has ministered with missionaries in northern Thailand since she was in college, does not see an issue with celebrating and playing in water fights, as long as caution is exercised. “For me, I don't drink, so I think they will see how I’m different from them,” she said, adding that it can lead to gospel conversations.

Manasakulpong, also 35, agreed, noting that Christians can take part in traditions that do not compromise their faith such as the water fights and honoring elders. He sees joining in as a way for Christians to remain present in the community and a witness to nonbelievers.

“Water fights are a separate action from a religious ceremony, so we can participate,” he said. Yet he notes that Christians should behave in an “appropriate and polite” way and refrain from violence.

Manasakulpong draws the line at pouring water over statues of Buddha or seeking the blessing of monks, noting that Christians should only worship and revere the one true God. He’s found that many Thai Christians attend festivals without knowing the significance or history of the holiday. So he urges church leaders to study the origins of Thai holidays to help congregants understand what they should and shouldn’t take part in when celebrating.

Showing respect to elders

Some Thais lament that the water fights have taken center stage in the holiday, pushing other traditions into the background. In the past, water splashing was not nearly as intense as it is now; typically smaller buckets of water were used and water guns weren’t as common.

“When we study the history, we will see that the Songkran festival is a beautiful tradition,” Manasakulpong said. He points to the quality time spent with family and the chance for the older generation to bless and impart wisdom to the younger generation. Families ask for forgiveness from one another and right the wrongs of the previous year.

Christians also embrace these concepts. Both pastors noted that it’s important for Christians to demonstrate to Thai society that honoring elders and Christianity are not mutually exclusive. That’s because in Thailand, Christianity is seen as countercultural. Those who convert to Christianity are viewed as abandoning the faith of their parents and the community around them. By no longer partaking in the customs and rituals tied to Buddhist beliefs, older family members may feel that they are rejecting them and their own Thai identity.

For instance, after a loved one dies, family members traditionally pour holy water over the body, make merit on behalf of the dead by giving money to the temple, and buy refreshments and gifts for monks who chant over the body. A Thai Christian refraining from participating in parts of the funeral can be viewed as dishonoring their elders.

Songkran can be an ideal opportunity to show that Christians also hold elders in high esteem. At Manasakulpong’s church, his staff and church members buy gift baskets containing items such as toiletries, soap, shampoo, fruit, and snacks to give to older church members during Songkran.

Over at Chaiboonsiri’s church, the older men and women sit in a row at rectangular tables at the front of the church. Younger members walk down the line to ask for a blessing and pour water from bowls over the hands of the elders to symbolize respect and honor. This activity can help bridge the gap between Thai culture and Christianity, Chaiboonsiri said.

“The Bible gives us the command to respect elders and show God's love for them,” he said. “Therefore, it is something that Thai Christians should do to the best of our abilities.”

Manasakulpong noted that Christians and Buddhists differ in their motivation to honor their elders. When Buddhists participate in temple activities or pour water over an elder’s hands, they are seeking to make merit and cancel out their bad karma so they can move up in their next life. For Thai Christians, the gifts, honor, and respect aren’t given out of a works-based theology.

“Christians do not make merit in order to be saved, because salvation is a gift from God,” Manasakulpong said. “But we should do good deeds and show love to others because doing so is an honor to God.”

Sharing the living water

Since so much of the new year holiday is spent with family, Chaiboonsiri encourages Thai Christians to deepen their relationships with their family and be a Christlike witness. Waiwang also believes the family time is an important opportunity to love them as Christ loves the church. She said young people should take the time to visit older family members to ask for forgiveness.

“If we did something wrong or disrespectful to them, it is the time to show them that we are sorry for the things we did,” Waiwang said.

As water sloshes over the streets of Chiang Mai, Chaiboonsiri speaks to his congregants and nonbelieving Thais about living water. This Sunday, he plans to preach from John 4, where Jesus tells the Samaritan woman at the well that if she drinks from the water he offers, she will never thirst again.

Thai Buddhists go to the temple every year to purify themselves—it’s never-ending and never enough, he said. Just like poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s famous line, “Water, water, everywhere, nor any drop to drink,” water is indeed everywhere in Songkran yet there never seems to be enough drops to spare for the sins that so easily entangle.

Buddhists cannot know if they’ve made enough merit to cancel out their sin. And if they fall ill or are unable to go to the temple, how can they atone for their sin? Life is too short to account for all the wrongdoing a person commits, and repeated “trips to the well” won’t quench the thirst for atonement, Chaiboonsiri said.

Here, Chaiboonsiri finds an opportunity to share the Good News: “If you receive Jesus, it’s forever—eternal life. Jesus is the water of life; you’re not thirsty again and again and again.”

After 18 Years on Christianity Today’s Board, Darryl King Says He’s a ‘Lifelong Friend’ of the Ministry

The hall-of-fame hurdler turned business leader turned pastor on what his years of service meant to him.

After 18 Years on Christianity Today’s Board, Darryl King Says He’s a ‘Lifelong Friend’ of the Ministry
Photo courtesy of Darryl King

Once upon a time, Darryl King won races, pretty much all the time. A gifted hurdler, King became the first African American track and field athlete inducted into Rice University’s hall of fame.

After graduation, King brought his work ethic and confidence of his past athletic—and academic—achievements to the business world. But whereas his drive and focus had led to uncomplicated success in athletics, he soon realized the cost of his professional achievements on his family.

Within a decade of marriage, King said he realized “I had shot out there in the world, and right away things were going great, but then suddenly nothing’s really going great because I was losing my wife and family.

“I knew that what I was pursuing was really empty.”

In her frustration with her marriage, King’s wife had become close to a couple who led her to Christ. When King noticed the change in her, he realized he wanted the same for himself. The same couple—who to this day are among their closest friends—helped him in the earliest days of his Christian walk.

More than 40 years later, King says these friends would never have imagined then the type of impact and opportunities he and his wife have had.

“And isn’t that the way the Lord works?”

Part of those surprising accomplishments have been King’s work at Christianity Today, where he recently completed 18 years of service on the board of directors.

King joined the board in 2004, while he was still working in the technology industry, and he was looking forward to bringing his knowledge of that sector to a print magazine organization.

“It was exciting because, over time, I realized CT was open to what was really happening in the world,” he said. “The articles and topics became more interesting to me.”

After several years on the board, King’s own career began to shift. He went to seminary and became a pastor and Christian counselor.

“The last ten years of my time at CT, I went from a tech executive into full-time pastoral ministry, and that really had a lot to do with people I engaged with at CT,” he said.

King’s relationships with board members also helped him when he became the lead discipleship pastor at an all-white congregation in the South.

“The ability to share my experience had some influence on several of the board members,” he said. “I would hope that they would say that was part of the unique experience that I brought to the board.”

It’s been encouraging for King that this shift hasn’t just occurred at the board level.

“I don’t know that some of the topics that CT covers recently would have been handled when I first started on the board,” King said. “To see CT’s broader inclusiveness, the conversations about different faiths, the cultural sensitivities—I’ve seen those increase since I started in 2004, and that’s really encouraging to me.”

One highlight for him was traveling in 2019 with 20 CT staffers to Alabama on a civil rights trip, where the trip made visits to Equal Justice Initiative’s National Memorial for Peace and Justice and The Legacy Museum, which honors those murdered in lynchings, and the 16th Street Baptist Church where a bombing by white supremacists killed four little girls. The group also visited a remote and rural part of the state where a woman shared her and her family’s experiences of living in a home that lacked access to clean water and basic utilities.

“I think about the lady that has since passed away and the time I was able to spend with her,” King said. “It makes me wonder how our time with her and on that trip changed who we are as an organization.

“When I think of CT, I think of the Book of Matthew talking about the least and the last—and this trip gave our staff a fuller perspective on what Jesus was teaching. At times, the trip was heart wrenching. But it was reality. It made me think of how CT can bring more of these important stories to those around the world.”

Now officially retired, King is attending a multiethnic church and has lately become a big fan of cruises. (He recently got back from one that made stops in Haiti, the Dominican Republic, Aruba, and Curacao.)

He also has a new project—an app that he’s working on with a business partner (whose last name is also King) called Familyworks.app. It is a tool that helps families and organizations pursue whole-health wellness. He’s also consulting in sales and marketing and loves all the learning along the way.

As he reflects on his time on the board, King sees that his calm and steady demeanor helped the group work through difficult seasons. When he became involved in pastoral ministry, his role became more of a shepherding one. He also fostered close relationships with his colleagues—as sounding boards for each other and sharers of wisdom into each other’s lives.

“When CT leads with Christ in view, then what CT pursues will always be relevant to the world it serves,” King said. “That’s what I’ve always pushed for while on the board.”

“I am a lifelong friend of CT.”

Morgan Lee is CT Global managing editor.

Books
Excerpt

Making Haste Slowly in Our Walk With God

In these hurried times, Christians are called to a steady journey of faith.

Christianity Today April 12, 2023
Illustration by Mallory Rentsch / Source Images: Getty / Unsplash

I have met with but one or two persons in the course of my life who understood the art of Walking, that is, of taking walks— who had a genius, so to speak, for sauntering. —Henry David Thoreau, “Walking

The restless, distracted energy of our technological age has risen to a fever pitch. With each advancement, we are bound closer together into a collective fragmentation without intimacy.

The loneliness and relational divides that flow back to the beginning of recorded history are being amplified rather than silenced. We engage in everything from religious practices, mindfulness, yoga, and exercise to television, sex, food, drink, and drugs. We do all this to escape.

As Don DeLillo wrote in his brilliant and funny novel White Noise, “That’s why people take vacations. Not to relax or find excitement or see new places. To escape the death that exists in routine things.”

The forsaken God has entered into and dealt with this cosmic loneliness, yet often followers of the crucified King are just as lonely as the rest. What is missing?

There is a classical adage that might prove helpful: festina lente, which means to “make haste slowly.” A crab and butterfly first symbolized this saying. Its meaning lies in the paradox that existence is not meant to be static or careless but defined by conscientious and careful movement.

As one who leans into life with a relatively free-spirited disposition, when I look at the crab-and-butterfly image, I find myself uneasy at the way the butterfly seems held back by the crab’s clamp on her wings. But that tendency has led me to make many grievous errors throughout my 48 years of life. The crab is a necessary reminder that our movement must be anchored in thoughtfulness.

Walking is a beautiful metaphor used throughout Scripture to symbolize both movement and intimacy. It is a lovely reminder that the goal of the Christian life is not arriving at a destination but knowing God. This is the very heart of what it means to be a disciple.

Walking can be sustained for much greater distances than running because it is motion essentially without strife. It is progress that is truly conscientious of its surroundings. Our walk is not a lonely journey, isolated in pursuit of self-actualization.

For Christians, our place in this world is discovered in walking with God toward others. We are free in Christ, but we are not free from him or one another. We cannot embody the individualistic worldview that says, “I am best when I’m alone.” Sadly, it is often Christian leaders who follow this path.

Solitude must never be separation. We cannot and must not escape the world or the people in it. False holiness drains of all meaning out of Christ’s forsakenness. It fights against the very One who tore down the walls of separation by building new ones.

As we walk with Jesus, who is our beginning, our end, and our way through the in-between, let us be careful to think of our progress not as a hero’s journey but as relational, intimate, and (due to our mixture) often clumsy. In other words, to walk with God is defined by progress that is most clearly seen by others and often barely perceptible to us.

If you are like me, you may find yourself thinking, I am not good company. What can I possibly have to offer Jesus? The answer, my friend, is simple: yourself. Christ doesn’t choose to use sinners because they’re strong, wise, or gifted—strength is a positive impediment—but because he’s gracious and he seems to enjoy using the weak things of this world to confound, and even reach, the wise.

The butterfly has been used in the history of the church to symbolize resurrection, metamorphosis, and transformation by the Spirit’s activity in our lives. But what of the crab? While I can find no use of the crab as a symbol in church history, I will say this: As the crab in the original festina lente emblem symbolized a grounding or foundation for healthy movement, so the cross of Christ must be the center and grounding of our lives.

If Jesus is the way and there is only one way to go, then there are a thousand ways to lose the way, fall from it, or even run from it—consider Abraham, Elijah, Jonah, and Peter. We will lose the way. But that is why Jesus came, why it is good news that the gospel is down-to-earth, and why it’s not good to travel alone.

The Cross is our center, our equilibrium, and our compass. It is a constant reminder that if you’ve dug yourself into a hole, Jesus’ love goes deeper still; if you’ve lost your way, he will leave the others to find you again and again; if you have fallen, that’s the whole reason he came; and if you have run away, the Cross can lead you home.

Jesus was forsaken so that you could be found. He is with you, so arise and return to your Father. He loves you and longs to embrace you. We belong, and the Cross and our forsaken King are the proof.

So festina lente. Let us make haste.

Slowly.

Adapted from Stumbling Toward Eternity. Copyright © 2023 by Josh White. Published by Multnomah, an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.

News
Wire Story

How Bethel and Hillsong Took Over Our Worship Sets

“If you have ever felt like most worship music sounds the same, it may be because the worship music … is written by just a handful of songwriters.”

Hillsong United on tour in 2022

Hillsong United on tour in 2022

Christianity Today April 12, 2023
Alberto E. Tamargo / Sipa USA via AP Images

On Easter Sunday, the worship band at Bethel Community Church in Redding, California, opened the service with “This Is Amazing Grace,” a 2012 hit that has remained one of the most popular worship songs of the past decade.

Chances are thousands of other churches around the country also sang that song—or one very similar to it.

A new study found that Bethel and a handful of other megachurches have cornered the market on worship music in recent years, churning out hit after hit and dominating the worship charts.

The study looked at 38 songs that made the Top 25 lists for CCLI and PraiseCharts—which track what songs are played in churches—and found that almost all had originated from one of four megachurches.

All the songs in the study—which ranged from “Our God” and “God Is Able” to “The Blessing”— debuted on those charts between 2010 and 2020.

Of the songs in the study, 36 had ties to a group of four churches: Bethel; Hillsong; Passion City Church in Atlanta; and Elevation in North Carolina.

“If you have ever felt like most worship music sounds the same,” the study’s authors wrote, “it may be because the worship music you are most likely to hear in many churches is written by just a handful of songwriters from a handful of churches.”

The research team, made up of two worship leaders and three academics who study worship music, made some initial findings public Tuesday. More details from the study will likely be released in the coming weeks.

Elias Dummer, a worship leader and recording artist, said he and his colleagues have been watching changes in worship music over the past decade. They wanted to know how worship songs become popular among churches, he said. They also wanted to know how the business of producing and marketing songs is shaping the worship life of local churches.

Dummer said many worship leaders believe the best songs become the most popular in churches. They also believe those songs become popular because they work—people respond to them during worship services and want to sing them over and over. But that’s not exactly true. Dummer and his colleagues found many of the more recent hits songs were released as singles on Spotify and other streaming services, which helps fuel their popularity.

“There are actual mechanisms by which songs become the most significant,” he said. “It’s not just whatever songs the Holy Spirit blesses that make it to the top of the charts.”

For their study, researchers compared popular worship songs written before 2010 with those written from 2010 to 2020. Those earlier songs were often associated with individual worship leaders such as Chris Tomlin and Matt Redman, rather than with churches, and came from a variety of sources.

But beginning in 2010, the most popular new songs began to come from megachurch worship bands—and the most popular worship artists began affiliating with those churches.

Of the 38 songs in the study, 22 were initially released by the four megachurches, with another eight songs released by artists affiliated with those churches. Six more were either collaborations between artists from those churches or cover songs performed by those churches.

Shannan Baker, a postdoctoral fellow at Baylor University, said the megachurch worship teams in the study also popularized songs from other artists, such as “Way Maker,” a song written by Sinach, a well-known Nigerian musician, as well as “Great Are You Lord” and “Tremble.”

“These bigger churches, even if they weren’t involved in making the songs, platformed them,” she said.

Adam Perez, assistant professor of worship studies at Belmont University in Nashville, said the four most influential megachurches all come from the charismatic tradition of Protestant churches. All of them, he said, have a spirituality that believes God becomes present in a “meaningful and powerful way” when the congregation sings a particular style of worship song.

Those songs become one of the primary ways of connecting with God—rather than prayer or sacraments or other rituals. Because of their market success, these churches have changed the spiritual practices and sometimes even the theology of congregations from many traditions.

“The industry itself becomes this invisible hand,” he said. “We don’t name the theology of praise and worship—we just assume it. And we use this kind of song repertoire to reinforce it.”

The study did not look specifically at the lyrics of the most popular songs. Baker did say she’s looking at those lyrics for a different project and found a few trends. For example, she said, few of the most popular songs talk about the cross or salvation.

“A lot of it is, what is God doing for me now? And what has God promised to do for me in the future?” she said.

Baker said that in the past, artists or publishers would put out a songbook or recordings of new worship songs, and then churches would pick out the songs in those collections that best fit their context. Now, she and other researchers wonder if these megachurches are driving which songs are used in worship.

The study is based on data about popular worship songs obtained by Mike Tapper, a religion professor at Southern Wesleyan University. Tapper and his colleague Marc Jolicoeur, a worship pastor from New Brunswick, Canada, worked on a previous study about how quickly hit worship songs appear and then disappear.

Jolicoeur said any concerns about the theology of the four megachurches, or the recent troubles at Hillsong, which has had several pastors resign in scandal, don’t seem to affect the demand for their music.

The popularity of megachurch worship songs doesn’t surprise Leah Payne, professor of American religious history at Portland Seminary in Oregon. Payne, who studies the Christian music business, said it likely reflects broader worship patterns. While most churches in the United States are small, most Christians worship at large churches. The 2020 Faith Communities Today survey found that about 70 percent of worshippers attend the top 10 percent of churches.

“The fact that the worship music of megachurches has a bigger share of the worship market corresponds to the practice of worshippers,” said Payne.

Payne doubts that scandals at churches such as Hillsong will affect the popularity of their music—because people have a relationship with the songs, not with church leaders.

Payne said worship bands at the most popular megachurches have a knack for creating great pop songs. And they know how to connect with mass audiences—both in person and through streaming services.

“They can go toe-to-toe with some of the biggest acts in music,” she said.

https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/1Qhry
Books

Carl Henry’s Temptation (And Ours)

What we can learn from Christianity Today’s troubling history of working with J. Edgar Hoover.

Christianity Today April 11, 2023
Illustration by Mallory Rentsch / Source Images: WikiMedia Commons / Getty

Billy Graham tried.

He preached in the White House the first Sunday after Richard Nixon was inaugurated in 1969, and he tried to preach clearly enough that the new president would hear his message. Graham engaged directly with Nixon’s inaugural address and said Nixon was wrong to rely so much on himself, his own ingenuity, his own goodness. Nixon was wrong when he said, “We need only look within ourselves” to solve the country’s most pressing problems. The president and the American people, Graham preached, should humble themselves, turn, and put their trust in God.

Or at least that is what he meant to say. His critique was so subtle that no one in the East Room of the White House noticed. After the service, they all drank orange juice and coffee and commented how nice it was, winning an election, taking control of the White House, and having a worship service under the famous portraits of George and Martha Washington. They completely missed the call to humility, because Graham couldn’t quite bring himself to make it.

What the founder of CT was really saying is only clear if you look at what he quoted from the inaugural address and then look at what Nixon said next and compare that to what Graham said next and see Graham is directly countering the president. No one did that though, so no one noticed. Not even the notoriously sensitive Nixon.

The new president just felt affirmed. Graham’s message was missed. And he kept getting invited to the White House, where he had access to power, as long as he continued to make morally devastating compromises.

The temptation to appease people in power is a strong one. The temptation to compromise for the sake of access isn’t new. For white evangelicals, it didn’t start with Donald Trump.

This was Graham’s temptation. This was CT founding editor Carl Henry’s temptation. And it is also ours.

Recent American evangelical history has been explained, frequently, with what historians call a declension narrative—things were good, and then they declined. Evangelicals used to hold high moral standards, the story goes, and then they enthusiastically embraced a lying, cheating reality TV star for president.

But we didn’t just suddenly jump the tracks. Historian Lerone A. Martin makes this clear in his new book, The Gospel of J. Edgar Hoover.

“From the beginning,” Martin writes, “the founders of modern white evangelicalism preached that American politics needed Christian piety and traditional morality while their political practice was marked by the gospel of amoral pragmatism.”

Martin specifically looks at evangelicals’ relationship with the man who led the FBI for almost half a century. Hoover was incredibly powerful, forcing successive presidents to cede him authority. He fashioned himself into America’s indispensable defender, as if he alone stood between the country and communism, crime, revolution, and all manner of chaos and disorder. He used that reputation to accrue more power and push a moral vision of America that maintained unjust hierarchies and brooked no criticism, especially not criticism from Black people long denied their civil rights.

Evangelicals came alongside Hoover in this project. The founding editors of CT, in particular, embraced Hoover as a moral leader and eagerly associated the magazine that was meant to define evangelicalism with the head of the FBI. They sought out and published multiple articles carrying Hoover’s byline and used them to promote the magazine.

Editors like Carl Henry were under no illusions that Hoover had been born again or had a personal relationship with Jesus. He preached a kind of patriotic deism. But that didn’t seem to matter.

Carl HenryWikiMedia Commons / Edits by CT
Carl Henry

Henry, normally the more discerning member of the first editorial team, even fawned over Hoover in their correspondence.

“It is always a privilege and pleasure to carry your essays in Christianity Today,” he wrote. “You have a part not only in the message of Christianity Today but in its mission.”

Martin interprets this to mean that the magazine’s real aim was political: establishing white Christian nationalism. He even suggests evangelicalism is at bottom, at its core, in its essence white Christian nationalism.

I’m not convinced that part is right. For one thing, I don’t think it makes sense to talk about the essence of evangelicalism. It is not unchanging or unchangeable. Evangelicalism exists in the contingency of history. Reckoning with the past, as Martin challenges evangelicals to do, has the potential to bring reform.

I’m also not convinced that the CT editors were embracing Hoover’s full vision of what America should be. A close look at the record shows something sadder and smaller than that. They weren’t responding to Hoover’s grand political agenda, but just a little bit of flattery.

Graham, Henry, and others in those Cold War days certainly wanted evangelicalism to serve as a spiritual resource in the conflict with global communism. They called America “back to God.” In the process, they sometimes confused the nation and the church. But the aspect of Hoover’s vision for America emphasized the most in CT’s archives is the importance of ministers. That’s what they were so enthusiastic about.

“The clergymen of America have a vital role,” Hoover’s first article said. “The Church is the heartbeat of America.”

A year later, almost plagiarizing himself, he said, “The ministers of America hold a vital place,” because “each Sunday morning literally millions of Americans listen to church sermons. Sermons represent one of the most potent forces for good in the nation today.”

These banalities are what pulled them in. This promise of importance—a powerful man saying they mattered to the fate of the nation, the fate of the free world—was seductive.

That flattery worked on a lot of people. Martin’s research is meticulous, if marred somewhat by claims and conclusions that go beyond the evidence. His book shows Hoover wasn’t working uniquely with evangelicals. Hoover collaborated very closely with Catholics—so closely that many people thought the FBI director himself was Catholic. He also worked with fundamentalists and creedal conservatives who didn’t like Billy Graham. He lured at least one Black minister to his cause. He had no trouble winning over liberal mainline Protestants, including the nation’s most elite Episcopalians and a United Church of Christ minister who offered to spy on the American Civil Liberties Union to prove his allegiance to Hoover.

J Edgar HooverWikiMedia Commons / Edits by CT
J Edgar Hoover

Anybody who wanted a little more respectability in Cold War America wanted an approving word from J. Edgar Hoover. The FBI director made use of that.

“The Bureau had virtually every white Protestant congregation in the metro DC area bidding for the privilege of hosting and worshipping with the FBI,” Martin writes.

I suppose it’s possible to see all of them as white Christian nationalists, depending on how you define the term, but what Martin documents is probably better described as what sociologist Robert Bellah called “civil religion.” The religious groups lent symbols and ceremonies, pulpits and magazine pages to proclaim America and the FBI’s defense of America as sacred causes. Hoover, reciprocally, granted access to power (though it was mostly symbolic) and respect.

This isn’t to exculpate the religious leaders who lent their faith to causes of inequality and visions of exclusion. But it is accurate to note that many were succumbing to a much more basic temptation. They wanted respect. They wanted access. They wanted someone, sometime, to throw them a parade.

This means, though, that evangelicals who abhor white Christian nationalism today and are appalled at the idea of spreading the gospel through state power are, nonetheless, susceptible. We, like Carl Henry, can be tempted. We evangelicals who want to be relevant and winsome will find the incentive to compromise is always right there.

Correct views are no protection against this temptation. Which is why it is also not, as some would have it, a uniquely evangelical problem. Go back to the church service in Nixon’s White House: Maybe Graham struggled to clearly critique the new president because he was evangelical. But the same thing happened over and over to ministers across traditions who were invited to Pennsylvania Avenue. Mainline clergy would start out bold, imagining what they would preach to the president in his own home, and then they would think better of it. One threw away a draft defending radicalism and instead talked about the nobility of the human spirit. Another wrote a sermon directly addressing Nixon, but then edited out every instance of the phrase “Mr. President,” lest his words seem too pointed.

A rabbi went even further, ending his sermon by saying, “The finger of God pointed to Richard Milhous Nixon, giving him the vision and wisdom to save the world and civilization.”

From what I can tell, it’s not a specific theological inclination that makes someone susceptible to political idolatry. Seeing power as anointing and mistaking a president for a messiah is a danger for us all. Like most sins, it’s easier to spot when someone else does it. But the desire for a political champion and the willingness to accept amoral pragmatism for a little access to power infects us all.

That means, though, that Martin is right that we can’t neatly separate “good evangelicals” from “bad evangelicals.” We are wrong to imagine that being more like Carl Henry or Billy Graham will simply inoculate us. We are wrong to imagine that there was some “before” time, when we did not have this problem. This is not just an issue for evangelicals who supported Donald Trump. Nor will it go away when the former president’s influence in American politics ultimately fades. The temptation we will always have with us.

CT’s embarrassing history of publishing the FBI director’s pablum should stand for evangelicals as a reminder of the dangers of appeasing powerful people. It might also redirect us to the wisdom of the sermon that Billy Graham tried and failed to preach to Richard Nixon: We too are wrong to rely so much on ourselves, our own ingenuity, and our own goodness. We too should be humble. We too need to be aware of our inclination to pursue power instead of trusting God.

Christ taught us to pray for a kingdom to come. He also showed us how it does: not through nationalism, or cooperation with the FBI, or publishing articles that will be loved by people in places of privilege, but by taking up a cross and proclaiming the Good News.

Daniel Silliman is news editor for Christianity Today and a historian with a doctorate from Heidelberg University. He is currently working on a religious biography of Richard Nixon, forthcoming from Eerdmans.

Church Life

Youth Pastors Ditch Gross-Out Games and Help Student Ministry Grow Up

Today’s groups are becoming more integrated with the rest of the church.

Christianity Today April 11, 2023
Illustration by Abigail Erickson / Source Images: Getty

In the 1990s and early 2000s, youth group culture relied on delivering fun and entertainment by any means possible: gross-out games, Christian rock concerts, hip hangout rooms, and pizza-party blowouts.

The activities were seen as vehicles to get kids in the door before sharing the gospel or offering Bible lessons.

Things have changed a lot since Jeremy Engbers grow up “playing games, getting dirty, and drinking blended Happy Meals” in church youth ministry.

Engbers, the 31-year-old director of worship, youth, and family at Olympia Christian Reformed Church, is trying to be the youth pastor he needed back then.

Like other pastors working in youth ministry today, Engbers focuses on relationship-building, intergenerational discipleship, and partnership with parents. His studies at Fuller Theological Seminary and access to resources at Fuller Youth Institute were helpful in building his current approach. Engbers also noted books like Sticky Faith and Growing Young as influential for him.

Prior to the past five or ten years, youth groups generally operated on their own schedule and programming within the church. In some churches, that even meant separate meetings during the church service on Sundays.

The siloed activities often isolated youth from the larger congregation, making it harder for them to integrate into grown-up ministry as a college student or adult. Engbers called it a kind of “spiritual daycare.”

Churches across denominations have seen young people stepping away from faith, and researchers at the Fuller Youth Institute say they don’t need a pastor in skinny jeans or a hip meeting space to make them stay. They need practices to root them in faith and community in a way that sticks.

Heather Kenison, youth director of student ministries at St. Luke’s United Methodist Church in Indianapolis, noticed the deep disconnect between students and congregants at her church. It affected the sticking power of the church once youth group days were over, she said.

“We had our high school small groups at the same time as ‘big church,’” Kenison told CT. “Then they would graduate and never want to go to ‘big church.’”

St. Luke’s changed its strategy in 2019 to allow students to attend the regular church service on Sunday mornings, giving them the opportunity to connect with the rest of the church and not just the youth group. Now, the youth group is decentralized, meeting in small groups weekly and convening as one larger body once a month.

Giving students the chance to make the “conscious decision” to be a part of the larger church is vital, in Kenison’s mind.

Youth ministry parachurch organizations have noticed the same trends.

Shane Pruitt, national next gen director with the Southern Baptist Convention’s North American Mission Board (NAMB), said he now educates pastors to involve youth more organically with the larger church. Before, he felt like they were asking youth to join an entirely new church after high school.

The NAMB speaks to both senior pastors and youth pastors, through the Youth Leader Coaching Network, about how they can equip and empower teens to serve the church as a whole.

This could mean partnering teens with adult volunteers in doing church work like sound setup or teardown, with the ultimate goal of a discipling relationship and contribution to the church.

“We cut discipleship legs out from under us when we’re separating people by ages and demographics,” Pruitt said, adding that one of the “greatest untapped resources” is senior adults and empty-nesters within the church.

Pruitt said that volunteer opportunities and serving together on mission trips are two ways he encourages churches to integrate more functionally and intergenerationally.

Gen Z, he said, often identifies with their grandparents’ generation more than their parents’. This is a significant opportunity for intergenerational faith formation that was absent from prior youth group approaches.

“The pendulum shifts from generation to generation,” Pruitt said. “Each generation is a reaction to the previous, and a lot of those senior adults have more time on their hands, too.”

How youth ministry got here

Prior to the 1970s, youth ministry didn’t really exist within the local church. Coming off the fervor of the youth-focused movement encapsulated by organizations like Youth for Christ (YFC), that began to change. YFC informally began in 1940, famously hiring Billy Graham as its first employee. Its mission was evangelism toward “relevant, relational evangelism to unchurched youth.”

Churches picked up on the draw of YFC’s youth rallies and adopted their own versions. But as culture shifted toward mass media and entertainment, youth group culture became defined by amusement-focused methods like eating challenges, trust falls, Christian ska music, and end times fiction.

Simultaneously, youth were slowly carved out of the local church’s family-focused approach and separated in ways that would not bode well for them. Today, youth ministries are seeking to remedy that.

For example, more youth-pastor-specific resources that emphasize the role of parents are popping up. Organizations like Rooted Ministry and Youth Pastor Theologian exist to equip youth ministries and parents to work together.

In the 2021 book Handing Down the Faith: How Parents Pass Their Religion to the Next Generation, researchers found that the most powerful influence on the faith lives of American teenagers and young adults “is the religious lives of their parents.”

The authors identified three factors in determining whether an adult child remains in their faith past high school. Those factors include:

  1. If the family attends church at least once a week
  2. If the parents reported that their religious faith was “extremely” important
  3. How often they have conversations about religious matters

In other words, keeping kids in their faith into adulthood is nearly impossible without parental commitment.

“If parents would increase the frequency of those conversations by just one standard deviation,” said Andrew Zirschky, research professor in youth ministry at Austin Seminary. “They will have a 66 percent reported increase in their reported level of faith in 10 years.”

The third predictor, according to the research, is the most important. It shows that the strongest tie to lasting faith is related to how often parents talk to their children about religious matters “as a part of ordinary life.”

Thus, youth groups partnering with parents will have the strongest outcomes for lasting faith. According to research from Back Pocket God: Religion & Spirituality in the Lives of Emerging Adults, which documents results from the latest National Study of Youth and Religion, there is no clear correlation between kids who attended youth group or went on mission trips and the strength of their faith later in life.

“If there’s a youth pastor out there thinking that his efforts, programs, trips, and teaching alone are likely to solidify the faith of young people, he’s believing this against all evidence to the contrary,” Zirschky said.

Jack Fitzgibbons, associate pastor of families at Pinecrest Baptist Church in Cordele, Georgia, said he recognizes the new model of training instructs youth ministers to cultivate the spiritual formation of children with parents, rather than “just teaching youth pastors how to pull off the next big event.”

However, the effects of divorce, single parenting, and an increase in stressful, busy lifestyles has kept more families away from church and parents drifting from their own faiths. This has a substantial impact on the impressionable faith of their children, given that most teenagers share a “religious identity” with them. When parents don’t attend church, children usually don’t either.

Parents are also more important because an increasing number of youth pastors are bivocational. Youth ministry is not a lucrative profession, and most churches don’t have the budget to pay for a full-time staff member.

Ministry Architects found that churches usually hire one full-time youth worker for every 50 kids. Given that most churches have a median membership of 200 or less, most don’t have the demand or resources, so incorporating volunteers and family involvement is essential.

Beyond parents: Mentorship matters

As director of operations at Youth Worker Community in New Brunswick, Canada, Jeremy MacDonald works to provide “relational support” to youth ministers. While families are the number one influence, MacDonald said the best way to influence the faith of the next generation is through mentor relationships.

Rather than youth groups being centered on one particular adult leader—the youth pastor—Youth Worker Community encourages churches to gather a diverse group of adults and volunteers to minister to youth. Meaningful interactions and connections with adult mentors beyond the youth pastor is key in turning out faith in young adulthood, MacDonald told Christianity Today.

“If those [mentors] journey with them, check in, help them land in a faith community past high school, the chance that their faith continues skyrockets,” MacDonald said.

A 2018 research report on the Canadian church from Youth for Christ and InterVarsity Christian Fellowship found that 77 percent of young adults stayed connected with a local church past high school if they were in regular contact with a mentor from their childhood church who helped them make a connection in a new congregation.

Without such connections, the chance of a young person joining a new local church was just 17 percent. When mentors communicate with kids as they move on to college communities, faith formation moves in a positive direction.

This “handoff” mentality is a focus for Pruitt at NAMB. Its most recent project, GenSend, aims to train youth group and college ministry leaders to better communicate with one another, through coaching cohorts.

“We are starting to bridge the gap between high school and college,” Pruitt said.

The idea is to give leaders from both sides of a young person’s life access to one another. High school leaders can then prepare them for college experiences and college leaders can anticipate the needs of incoming freshman, Pruitt explained.

“When high school leaders hear what college leaders are seeing,” Pruitt said, “they can almost reverse engineer the mindset starting in seventh grade to prepare them to go out and be missionaries on their college campuses.”

Megan Faulkner has been the director of Anchored Student Ministries at St. Paul’s Ocean Grove Church in Ocean Grove, New Jersey, for 15 years. She said integrating youth ministry into a larger church vision has been “paramount to overall church health.” It’s been a struggle to fuse together, but Ocean Grove is committed to staying focused on serving students within the context of their families and the entire church body.

The church does this by communicating youth ministry successes, struggles, and events to church leadership and the congregation, often asking for prayer and bringing in adult volunteers for student and family events.

The mentorship and discipleship piece that comes with this integration is vital for young people, who are “ravenous for absolute truth,” Faulkner said.

“The world is constantly lying to them, and they know that, so they’re searching for what is true and right,” she said. “We noticed the change in their question-asking and what was important to them, so we changed our teaching strategy dramatically and have seen incredible impact.”

Where we go from here

Not everyone left youth group culture of the 1990s and 2000s with a dying faith. Many who serve in youth ministry today are products of that time, did their share of scavenger hunts and gross-out challenges, and want to see this generation of young people supported and equipped in different ways.

Some have continued the focus on church-adjacent youth ministries that could be a more powerful route to a lasting faith. The Urban Youth Worker’s Institute exists to provide positive role models and mentors to youth in specific geographic areas. Others see empowering youth leaders within the youth group as vital, viewing time together as a “leadership laboratory” for empowering youth in the future.

Youth ministers and researchers agree that partnering with parents, bringing in a diverse group of mentors, and communicating with college connections in the immediate aftermath of high school are key to helping teenagers continue walking a path of faith.

“The relational capital that our students are building is what holds them in the future, not necessarily the charisma of the youth pastor,” Engbers said.

Books

The Bible Does Everything Critical Theory Does, but Better

Scripture offers a deeper analysis of modern society than modern society could give itself.

Christianity Today April 11, 2023
Illustration by Mallory Rentsch / Source Images: WikiMedia Commons / Pexels

Many people become suspicious at the mention of critical theory, especially as it applies to controversial matters of race, gender, law, and public policy. Some see the ideologies traveling under that banner as abstruse frameworks only minimally related to real-world affairs. Others see critical theory as a ruse meant to confer unearned scholarly legitimacy on highly debatable political and cultural opinions.

Biblical Critical Theory: How the Bible's Unfolding Story Makes Sense of Modern Life and Culture

Biblical Critical Theory: How the Bible's Unfolding Story Makes Sense of Modern Life and Culture

HarperCollins Children's Books

672 pages

$30.38

Christopher Watkin, an Australian scholar on religion and philosophy, wants to reorient discussions of critical theory around Scripture’s grand narrative of redemption. In Biblical Critical Theory: How the Bible’s Unfolding Story Makes Sense of Modern Life and Culture, he shows how God’s Word furnishes the tools for a better, more compelling critical theory—one that harmonizes the fragmentary truths advanced by its secular alternatives. Mark Talbot, professor of philosophy at Wheaton College, spoke with Watkin about his book.

Let’s begin with a basic question: How do you define critical theory?

There’s more than one answer to that question. There’s a narrow sense and a broad sense. The narrow sense is probably the one that most people come across first today. People have heard of things like critical race theory that involve very particular ways of critiquing society through a specific lens. But critical theory, more broadly conceived, is a way of engaging with society that points out what’s wrong with the world on a deep level and then suggests what needs to change to make it better.

As I’ve studied critical theories over the years, I’ve noticed that almost all of them do three things. First, critical theories make certain things viable so that you begin to think those things are possible—like Marxist revolution, for example. Second, they make things visible, like the unequal treatment of women in society that many people ignored or simply didn’t see for a long time. Third, they make things valuable. They catechize us about what to desire and what to condemn.

You mention critical race theory, which has become a flash point for some Christians and a big reason why critical theory has a bad name among them. Where do we tend to go wrong in our attitudes toward critical theory?

Critical theory does have a particularly bad name among certain groups of Christians. It also has an unusually good name among others. Both responses are problematic because Christians should not expect worldly ideology to represent either a perfect ideal for the church or the Devil incarnate.

There are very important theological reasons for that. First, only God is good, and so we should expect everything in the world to be a mixture—a shadow of God’s good creation but also somehow twisted, misunderstood, and distorted because sin has pulled it out of shape. That’s true of critical theory and other ideologies as well. There are some things that critical theory seeks to do that I think Christians should also want to do—upholding justice and fairness, for example. Yet the ways critical theory goes about doing those things are different from biblical ways, and that’s part of how critical theory has taken biblical principles and distorted them and misunderstood them to some extent.

But the problem for the church is when Christians see critical theory as the only thing that must be opposed, as if everything else is either neutral or positive. It becomes the single thing that Christians must fight tooth and nail. There’s a naiveté in thinking, If we just get rid of this one thing, then society will be wonderful. So that’s how I think some Christians have gotten unsettled about critical theory, by either utterly embracing it or utterly rejecting it.

How do you see the biblical narrative functioning as a kind of critical theory?

Starting with those categories I’ve already laid out, a critical theory makes things viable, visible, and valuable. The Bible is of course the Word of God, the sword of the Spirit that makes us wise for salvation. But it also makes certain things viable. Many today would laugh at the idea of trusting God’s promises. But when you read enough of the Bible, you begin to see what it would be like to trust this sort of God. Trusting him then becomes viable.

The Bible also makes things visible. You may have seen many sunsets, for instance, but as you read from Psalm 19:1 that the heavens declare the glory of God, you learn to see that glory in beautiful sunsets. His glory is made visible for you.

And the Bible also makes things valuable. Here’s an example from my own life. Before I was a Christian, I would have looked at you very quizzically if you had told me that I should seek to serve other people. It would have made no sense to my 14-year-old self. But you can’t read far in the Bible without coming across exhortations to serve others, especially from Jesus’ lips. So service becomes something you value if you’re seeking to conform your view of the world to the biblical view.

In all these ways, then, the Bible is acting like a critical theory, in that it makes things viable, visible, and valuable.

What is the relationship between your project and Augustine’s project in his great City of God?

Augustine’s book provides the pattern that I, very falteringly, have sought to follow. What I found in City of God was a breathtaking example of someone surveying the whole of the culture in which he lived. Augustine leaves no stone unturned. In the first half of the book, he overviews the whole of Roman society, which is incredibly important because cultures are ecosystems and you can’t understand one part in isolation from the whole.

In the second half of the book, Augustine then travels through the Bible, from Genesis to Revelation, as a way of engaging with late Roman culture. And he does so with the aim of telling a more convincing and richer story about both God and Rome than Rome could tell about itself. I found that pattern incredibly compelling, and I knew that if I wanted to bring late modern culture into conversation with the Bible, this was the blueprint to follow.

What is the ultimate goal of developing a biblical critical theory?

The ultimate goal must be loving God and neighbor. Now, of course, there are millions of ways to do that, so that doesn’t tell you anything very specific about the ultimate goal of biblical critical theory. But unless that’s your highest goal, you have to ask as a Christian whether what you’re doing is really worthwhile.

More specifically, this project helps us love God and neighbor like this: It’s hard to love God well in a culture that’s catechizing you in ways you aren’t aware of or don’t understand. If we don’t realize how contemporary Western society is shaping us, then we won’t know which aspects of that shaping are more or less benign, and which aspects we should resist or transform.

And in leading Christians through the biblical story from Genesis to Revelation, biblical critical theory is also teaching us the wonderful big picture of God’s plans for us. There’s a “wow” that comes from seeing the big sweep of redemptive history and seeing how God’s complex, multilayered story makes sense of our world and our own lives within it.

In your introduction, you describe your experience writing grant proposals. Sometimes, when you figured you had written a slam-dunk proposal, the grant committee would come back with the question, So what? In the context of your book, you explain how asking, So what? is different than asking, say, What is this doctrine? or Why should we believe it? Could you explain that difference more fully?

Take the Bible’s first verse: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” A doctrinal approach would seek to understand things like: Who is this God? And how does this creation account differ from other ancient creation accounts? A traditional apologetic approach would seek to justify the claim in the verse and to demonstrate why this is a reasonable thing to claim and why the alternatives may be less reasonable.

Both of those are great approaches. They’re just not the approach I’m taking in the book. The “So what?” approach to that verse would ask: What difference does the fact that God created the heavens and the earth make to the way we understand reality, our culture, and ourselves? One difference is that, given this universe was made by one God alone, there’s a coherence to it. It’s not the result of a war between different gods or a chance occurrence with no intention behind it. There’s a purposefulness to this world. That shapes the way we engage with other people and understand ourselves and our purpose as well.

Another difference is that it is very clear in the Bible that nothing compelled God to create. He was not following some iron law of necessity; he was not bowing to some greater principle. As far as we can tell from the Scriptures, he made the world because he loves us, as strange as that may seem to modern ears. And that means that right at the heart and origin of the universe is not necessity or law but gift, grace, overflow, and superabundance. And if that’s how our universe began, then it’s a very different place to live in than a place governed by iron necessity and endless chains of causality. It affects the way that we live in modern society in all sorts of ways, some of which I tease out in the book.

You highlight two tools that help you develop a biblical critical theory, the first of which you call diagonalization. In your view, diagonalizing helps us avoid the mistake of treating Christianity and contemporary culture as completely distinct in their patterns and rhythms. Could you say more about how diagonalization works?

The principle begins from the beautiful reality that a biblical view of the world holds together in harmony things that the modern world has wrenched apart from each other and put into conflict. Take the image of God as an example. There are two beautiful, complementary truths held together in this language: a human dignity that comes from being made in the image of God, and a humility that comes from being reminded that we are not God himself. Both our dignity and our humility come from the same source.

But if you then look to the modern world, you’ll see that these two beautiful, harmonic biblical principles have been ripped apart from and opposed to each other. On the one hand, you have the idea that we are nothing more than machines or animals, which very imperfectly captures something of the humility of human beings in Genesis. We were even created on the same day as the other animals.

But then some modern anthropologies also treat us as if we were gods, suggesting that nothing should stand in the way of our will. This comes through in thousands of catch phrases: “Set your heart on whatever you desire, and you can get it.” “You can be whoever you want to be.” “You do you.” And other language in that vein.

Modernity awkwardly gives us these two anthropologies and says, “You’re a machine and you’re also a god; now go and live your life in peace and harmony.” Psychologically, it’s incredibly burdensome to sit on the horns of that dilemma. To diagonalize is to say that both aspects of modern anthropology are actually dismembered limbs of a beautiful biblical whole where they harmonize perfectly. So we need to recover the biblical harmony.

What we mustn’t do is split the difference and say I’m half machine and half god. That’s ridiculous and not biblical. So to diagonalize doesn’t mean compromising and meeting in the middle. It means showing that the two alternatives are both derivative and partial when compared to the biblical whole.

The second tool is something you call out-narrating. You talk about Scripture “out-narrating its cultural rivals.” And you show, for instance, how Christianity out-narrates the late-modern answer to the question Who am I? which traces back to René Descartes, the father of modern philosophy. How does the Christian understanding of personal identity make more sense than the late modern position?

Of course, it’s not the case that everything was perfect until Descartes. Right from the earliest philosophers, there were problematic ways of thinking about ourselves. It’s just that the particular story that I’m telling begins with Descartes.

What Descartes does with identity is to ground our understanding of ourselves inside ourselves for the first time. This is the upshot of his famous saying Cogito ergo sum, or “I think, therefore I am.” The idea then develops and changes, and by the time that you get to John Locke you have this idea that political scientist C. B. Macpherson calls Locke’s “possessive individualism.” It is the odd idea that we own ourselves, we possess ourselves, and therefore we can do with ourselves what we would do with any other possession. In Locke’s thinking, this has various caveats around it, but the Western tradition has tended to drop those caveats as time has gone on, so that we’ve come to see our bodies and our very selves as a possession.

If I possess myself, I can do what I want with myself because I own myself. Therefore, you get an emerging idea that nobody can tell me either who I am or how I should be. Nobody else has a claim on me. Nobody else can legitimately make me do anything that I don’t want to do, in the same way that they can’t just take one of my possessions.

This leads to a view of the self that is incredibly liberating on the surface. There’s something beguiling and attractive about it, especially to people who have lived in societies where they are always told what to do and where they have no autonomy. But one problem with this view of the self is that it inscribes identity into a logic of the market. I buy myself—and this is what we’ve found in recent decades: We construct our identities through our purchases. On one level, it’s the brands that we choose to adorn ourselves with, but it’s also the indie philosopher or theologian we want to be overheard namedropping. What new trend do we want to be out in front of?

From there, it’s not much of a jump to identity being a commodity that is bought and sold. I guess the most vivid place to see that today is online, where we curate particular identities. We market them to gain likes and follows and ultimately financial and reputational rewards.

The biblical view of identity is a profound subversion of that market paradigm, because in order to know who I am biblically, I don’t start within myself. I reach outside myself. Augustine’s Confessions is a beautiful example of this. It’s been called the first autobiography in the Western tradition, but of course it’s not written as a normal autobiography. It’s written as a prayer, in the second person. To find out who he is, Augustine knows that he must reach outside of himself to the God whose he is. The philosopher Michael Hanby, in his book Augustine and Modernity, has a very helpful way of putting this. He says that Christian identity is constructed as what he calls “doxological dispossession.” Doxological in the sense that I find myself as I adopt an attitude of praise to God. Dispossession in the sense that the way to find myself is to lose myself in knowing Christ. In the Gospels, he who seeks to save his life will lose it, but he who loses his life, for Christ’s sake and for the sake of the gospel, will find it.

Augustine has a very rich way of putting this in the Confessions. He says, If I look inside myself, what I find is a mess—an impenetrable swirl of different desires and ideas. There’s no coherence, no stable identity there. But then he says that when he reaches outside himself to God, he’s gathered together. He uses this beautiful imagery of being gathered as a self.

This frames Christian identity not as a possession that is bought and sold, but as a gift, a superabundant gift from God. And it makes us fundamentally relational beings as well. I can’t think of myself as an atom isolated from everyone else. There’s something incredibly healthy, both individually and socially, in this view of identity that isn’t subject to the vicissitudes of the market, that sends me outside myself and points me toward God and others.

What is your greatest hope for how developing a biblical critical theory can strengthen our posture and witness as believers?

I think it will, by God’s grace, equip and empower Christians to be shaped by biblical patterns and rhythms in the way we live, think, and engage with the world, rather than unthinkingly being shaped by the patterns and rhythms of late modern society. As Christians, we want to be people of the Book. We want to be people who love God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength, and who love our neighbor as ourselves. In the terms of Jeremiah’s letter to the exiles in Babylon, we want to be people who work for the peace and prosperity of the city where God has put us. Yet all those things are incredibly hard if we have no sense of the distinctive patterns and rhythms of the Bible and how they might stand against—or in some cases even sit alongside—the patterns and rhythms of our society.

News

Myanmar Releases Imprisoned Baptist Leader

UPDATED: After serving more than a year in prison, Kachin pastor and human rights activist Hkalam Samson is free.

Hkalam Samson (center), a prominent Kachin Baptist leader, and other survivors of religious persecution meeting President Donald Trump in 2019.

Hkalam Samson (center), a prominent Kachin Baptist leader, and other survivors of religious persecution meeting President Donald Trump in 2019.

Christianity Today April 10, 2023
WikiMedia Commons / White House

Update (July 26, 2024): Authorities released Hkalam Samson Monday after the former head of the Kachin Baptist Convention spent 16 months in prison, according to a leading member of a Kachin peace organization. Last April during Thingyan New Year, officials released Samson under general amnesty but then detained him again hours later. At the time, Maj. Gen. Zaw Min Tun, spokesperson of the ruling military council, told the BBC that Samson had not been rearrested, but they had taken him back in “for cooperation and discussion about the peace process.” Lamai Gwanja, a member of the Kachin-based Peace-talk Creation Group, told the Associated Press that Samson had been living at a house in the prison compound. Gwanja added that Samson had not taken part in any activities related to peace talks while in detention. The US State Department welcomed the news in a statement, calling Samson “a prominent, well-respected religious leader whose courageous work includes advocating for freedom of religion or belief for all.”

Update (April 10, 2023):

On Good Friday, Myanmar’s military junta sentenced Hkalam Samson to six years in prison on charges of terrorism, unlawful association, and inciting opposition. Hkalam denies the charges, which international rights groups and the Kachin diaspora believe to be politically motivated.

The first two charges stem from Hkalam’s 2022 trip to Laiza in Kachin state, where he met with Kachin leader Duwa Lashi La, the head of Myanmar’s government-in-exile, and General Sumlut Gunmaw, the vice chief of staff of the Kachin Independence Army, which has long fought against the Myanmar military.

The third charge is the result of a Zoom prayer meeting with Kachin Christian where he called the young people to build “the nation in Christ,” according to the The New York Times.

“He is a man who knows God and loves God,” Hkalam’s wife, Zung Nyaw told the Times. “He is a preacher, so he has no enemies. He is a person who sacrifices himself and helps others.”

In July 2019, Hkalam Samson, a pastor from a predominantly Christian ethnic group in Myanmar, met with President Donald Trump at the Oval Office. Standing with a group of victims of religious persecution from around the world, he shared how the Kachin people were “oppressed and tortured by the Myanmar military government” and thanked the Trump administration for placing sanctions on four top generals.

Three and a half years and one military coup later, Hkalam was arrested at the Mandalay International Airport on December 4. The junta charged him with unlawful association and breaking the country’s counterterrorism law for meeting with Kachin armed forces and praying with the leaders of Myanmar ’s government in exile, the National Unity Government. Hkalam, the former head of the Kachin Baptist Convention (KBC), faces up to 13 years in prison.

At the time of his arrest, 65-year-old Hkalam was traveling to Bangkok for medical appointments. His family is now concerned for his health: In January, his wife said he was suffering from pneumonia and high blood pressure, and she had not been allowed to send him medicine or food.

Known internationally for his diplomacy and peacemaking skills, Hkalam has been a leading advocate for the Kachin people, who have been engaged in an ongoing civil war with the military junta for decades. Calls for Hkalam ’s release have sounded from around the globe, including from the U.S. State Department, human rights groups, and the Kachin diaspora.

“He's the image of Kachin Baptist churches, and he's the image of the Kachin people,” said Labya La Seng, the pastor of Dallas-Fort Worth Kachin Baptist Church and president of the Kachin American Baptist Association.

A voice for the Kachin

The Kachin are predominantly Baptist due to the work of American Baptist missionaries in the 19th century. While Adoniram Judson was the first Protestant missionary to arrive in Myanmar in 1813, mission work among the Kachin began in 1877. William Henry Roberts baptized the first seven Kachin Christians in 1882 and they started the first Kachin church later that year. The KBC was founded in 1910 and now includes more than 300 churches.

Before his arrest, Hkalam advised the KBC and served as the chairman of the Kachin National Consultative Assembly, a platform for the Kachin people to congregate and hold intercommunity dialogue.

A longtime representative of the Kachin, Hkalam met with not only Trump but also President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and former president Jimmy Carter (in 2013) when they visited Myanmar, according to The New York Times.

His comments at the 2019 meeting with Trump caught the attention of military officers in Myanmar, leading Lt. Col. Than Htike to file a complaint against Hkalam. The pastor said he changed his prepared comments last minute to include calling out the military junta ’s abuses due to a move of the Holy Spirit, according to Frontier Myanmar.

Before his scheduled court date, Hkalam refused to apologize even as he was told the case would be withdrawn if he did so.

“I do not want to trade off the truth for my own individual escape,” Hkalam told Frontier Myanmar. “I would like to give respect to all who are murdered, raped, and tortured wrongfully during 60 years of blood-shedding oppressions,” Hkalam said.

The military later withdrew the complaint—without an apology from Hkalam.

Since the February 2021 military coup, fighting between the Kachin armed forces and the Myanmar military has intensified. In October 2022, a junta airstrike targeting a Kachin Independence Organization concert in Hpakant township killed 60 people. Hkalam coordinated medical aid for those injured and helped arrange the funerals of the victims. Later he held a prayer meeting in the Kachin state capital of Myitkyina for those killed.

In a press briefing in February, State Department spokesman Ned Price condemned Hkalam ’s arrested and called for his immediate release.

"We are extremely concerned for his well-being and safety and urge our partners and allies to join us in calling on the regime to drop all charges and immediately and unconditionally release Reverend Samson," Price said.

He also noted that the pastor ’s “incredible work advocating for religious freedom, justice, peace, and accountability should be celebrated and replicated, not condemned.”

‘Anybody could be the next victim’

When Labya, who immigrated to the United States in 1999, heard the news of Hkalam ’s arrest, he was shocked that the junta “dare to touch Dr. Hkalam without any hesitation.” At the same time, he was not surprised because of the junta ’s brutal actions since the coup.

“I’m not yet ready to accept the fact that a man like Dr. Hkalam was detained. He is not an ordinary person; he is a man who met the US president,” Labya said. “This simply shows the defiance of the military council and [its challenge to] the free world.”

While Labya differed with Hkalam on views of ecclesiastical polity among Kachin Baptist churches, he has great respect for Hkalam and applauded his relentless advocacy for justice in their homeland. He remembers in 2011, Hkalam visited Labya ’s church and preached a message from Amos 5:24, “But let justice roll on like a river, and righteousness like an never-failing stream,” encouraging the church to demonstrate their faith through love, mercy, and justice. This verse has become the battle hymn of Kachin Baptists in the US.

“Justice is not a matter of self-interest but of a humble commitment to the well-being of all who are made in God ’s image,” Labya said.

Gum San Nsang, president of the Kachin Alliance (a network of US-based Kachin communities) and chair of the World Kachin Congress, worked with Hkalam over the years on projects relating to internally displaced people, drug eradication, religious liberty, and the peaceful coexistence of ethnic groups in Myanmar. Nsang, who is based in Washington, D.C., helped arrange Hkalam ’s meeting with Trump, and on the same trip, the two attended the International Religious Freedom summit.

Since his friend ’s detainment, Nsang has urged the United Nations and the US government to use diplomatic leverage to help release Hkalam. “We have not directly engaged the coup regime, because they are using Rev. Samson's detention as a political tool,” Nsang said.

Nsang described the grim reality of his homeland today, where airstrikes, bombing raids, and “every crime known to men” are common occurrences. As recently as last week, soldiers entered a tea shop in Hpakant township and beat the owner, his wife, his daughter, and four customers before arresting them. The military claimed they heard a report that the owner ’s daughter made political posts on Facebook.

“The entire Kachin region’s population is on emergency alert,” Nsang said. “Everyone is in fear of being detained, arrested, or killed. When a prominent religious leader like Rev. Samson could be picked up, snatched away, and secretly interrogated for over 20 days with no news, anybody could be the next victim.”

Remembering their homeland

For the Kachin in the US, returning to their homeland has now become a perilous undertaking and a trip most wouldn’t dare make as the war rages on. Labya said he ’s afraid to fly into the country after what happened to Hkalam, and the reality of not being able to freely travel to Myanmar is difficult to face.

Still, Kachin Christians “need to remember we are to play the role of our brother ’s keeper,” Labya said, referring to Genesis 4:9. “We're not in a position to keep our brothers absolutely safe, but we are mandated to do whatever we can to speak up for them, making sure that we are going to reach out to them in their needs, in their distress.”

That means writing members of Congress to use their diplomatic power to ensure the Myanmar government respects the rights of all ethnic minorities, not just the Kachin. It also means working with other Kachin diaspora groups to advocate for Hkalam.

On March 12, Labya gathered with four other Kachin churches in the Dallas-Fort Worth area for an interdenominational service. The immigrants and refugees joined together to worship, hear a pastoral message on justice, and pray for peace in Myanmar. The service included calls for prayer and solidarity with those who are imprisoned unjustly for a righteous cause.

The newly formed DFW Kachin Christian Network plans to continue the joint services with different churches hosting.

“We are really, really praying that our churches back home, even [those] in the US, will be working together and holding to the Word of God and sharing in the legacy those American missionaries left behind,” Labya said.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube