Ideas

The Derek Chauvin Verdict Is Good. But I’m Still Groaning.

Columnist

Full justice will come when Jesus returns. In the meantime, we fight for a “foretaste of glory divine.”

Christianity Today April 21, 2021
Scott Olson / Getty Images

In the book of Romans, the apostle Paul tells Christians that “the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth.” He goes on to say that we “groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption to sonship, the redemption of our bodies” (8:22–23).

We African Americans understand this inward groaning—the discomfort of waiting for the full redemption of our physical selves. Like all creation, our bodies await renewal because they have borne pain and loss for far too long.

Some of our pain includes violent death at the hands of police officers or vigilantes who are intimidated by our presence and fire their guns, hang us from trees, pound us with their clubs, or crush us with their knees.

Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin didn’t accept George Floyd’s humanity but instead perceived his body as a threat. Chauvin ignored the onlooking crowd, who shouted at him to stop, and proceeded to drain the life out of Floyd over the course of nine and a half minutes.

The Minneapolis police officer was ostensibly fearful of a man who was already subdued and placed face-down on the ground. Because of the justice system’s track record of accepting police brutality as a necessary part of the job, Chauvin relied on his badge to justify his actions.

Still now, so many Black and brown bodies groan because of the bullets or the pounding they take, even from those entrusted to protect and serve us. Yet even when we are not physically beaten, we still groan. We groan for many different reasons.

There is another cause for groaning in anticipation of redemption: Our bodies are decaying faster than those of our white counterparts. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the health disparities already present between white and nonwhite people. And Black and brown folks are carrying so much anxiety that our life expectancy is significantly lower than that of whites.

Due to the stress of being Black and brown in the USA, we are physically less healthy than white people, even when our income levels are the same. We ache and groan simply because of the toll racism takes on our bodies, even when we are not physically under attack. We ache in the pit of our stomachs whenever we see the police cruiser in the rearview mirror, or hear the sirens getting louder.

We ache in our bodies when white people perceive us as being out of our place. We get followed in stores. We get mistaken for “the help.” We get ignored when we should be heeded, and we receive extra attention when we’re minding our own business. We inwardly groan because of slights, microaggressions, and especially encounters with authority figures that often quickly escalate to dangerous altercations.

Our children start to ache and groan early in life because they get suspended or otherwise punished more frequently than white students. Our bodies inwardly groan and eagerly await our adoption because injustice is painful. We ache and groan because our sisters and brothers get killed and we feel powerless. In pain we take to the streets. With groans, we raise our voices in protest and cry, “Black lives matter!”

But rather than receiving support from Christian sisters and brothers, we find that prominent and significant numbers of them demonize our pleas but not the system that crushes us.

It is no surprise that Chauvin’s murderous act was recorded, since we are hyperaware of police activity. And we are grateful for the young woman, Darnella Frazier, who pressed through her pain to record the horror. We ached and groaned for George Floyd, but also for all the other victims, many of whom did not have their brutal encounters recorded.

We held our breath for nearly a year, all the way up until the afternoon of April 20, 2021, when Judge Peter Cahill read the verdict. Chauvin was pronounced guilty of the three charges against him.

Even so, our groans haven’t stopped. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison rightly acknowledged that the guilty verdict did not signal justice but rather accountability, because justice “implies true restoration.”

Indeed, justice means George Floyd would be alive today, because our society would find better ways to live as neighbors. Through love, we’d eliminate much injustice and tackle evil rather than tolerate it.

When I heard the verdict that Chauvin was found guilty, I wept in relief. But my inward groaning hasn’t stopped. The apostle Paul writes that all creation groans, yet we know that some parts are in more agony than others. Of course, our hope is eschatological, which is to say that justice will reach a climactic fulfillment at the end of time when Jesus returns. However, in the meantime, we strive—in the words of an old hymn—for a “foretaste of glory divine.”

We get that foretaste by focusing not only on individual behaviors but also on the unjust systems that exploit, threaten, and endanger anyone, especially those with relatively little societal power.

As we anticipate full redemption, then, let us do the handiwork that God has for us to do (Eph. 2:10). Our good work glorifies God not because we will put an end to all evil but because we might reduce some people’s suffering. Reducing the aches and pains demonstrates the love of a Savior who healed and fed brown bodies to show what the kingdom of God is like.

Testimony

I Laid Down My Islamic Privilege to Preach Jesus Around the World

How a direct descendant of Muhammad met Christ on a crowded Pakistani sidewalk.

Christianity Today April 21, 2021
Courtesy of Dynamis World Ministries / Edits by Christianity Today

I was born in a Sunni Muslim home in Bangladesh, where I learned the meaning of stern discipline from my father, a major general in the military with responsibilities in the intelligence service. We lived on different army bases in elaborate quarters reserved for officers and their families. Servants catered to our every need. The business and political elite of Bangladesh and Pakistan frequented social events in our home.

I grew up attending an Islamic madrasa (religious school), where we studied the Qur’an and learned classical Arabic from an imam. My father could trace his lineage back to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (the name derives from Hashem, grandson of the prophet Muhammad’s great-grandfather). His heritage qualified me as a direct descendant of Islam’s founder.

I was respected for my holy ancestry. Yet my childhood was often painful, especially after my parents divorced and my father remarried unexpectedly. I was eight years old, feeling abandoned and missing my mother.

My stepmother regularly abused me mentally and physically. Screaming curses, she would hit me with a cricket wicket or dig her sharp fingernails into my ears, which caused them to bleed. Sores peppered my body. My father ignored my pleas for help and beat me for supposedly lying about the abuse.

When I turned 13, I joined a prestigious air force college as a cadet aiming at a career like my father’s. However, I left the military in 1975 when I was 21. Unhealed wounds from my childhood sent me into a downhill spiral. Suicidal thoughts haunted me. Then a seemingly random incident changed my life forever.

Willing to die

While walking in Lahore, Pakistan’s second largest city, to buy an electric water heater, I noticed a Caucasian man on a street corner giving out gospel tracts. Wearing scruffy jeans, he looked like a hippie. He was well over six feet tall and stood out from the normal rush of shoppers, honking autos, weaving motorbikes, three-wheeler taxis, donkey carts, and pungent aromas from food vendors. Curious about his demeanor, which radiated inner peace, I approached him and asked, “Who are you, and where are you from?”

He said he was a servant of the Lord Jesus Christ from England. He belonged to a street evangelism team from the Jesus People movement, known for traveling around the world during the 1970s. From my Muslim upbringing, I had only encountered Jesus as a prophet who appeared before Muhammad. And I didn’t believe he had died on a cross—the Jews, we were told, had crucified Judas instead.

After exchanging a few words with this English man—later, I learned his name was Keith—I walked away, about 50 yards or so, before returning. Although I believed in Islam, I wanted to know more about his own faith. Keith told me Christ would set me free and give me a new life. Though I doubted his God was interested in my despair, or even existed, I bowed and prayed to receive Christ on the crowded sidewalk in front of a shoe store.

I sensed this was what I had been waiting for all my life. It felt like a huge boulder had been lifted off my back. I saw everything in technicolor, and I wanted to sing and laugh.

Keith and I arranged to meet the next morning at the Lahore YMCA so I could learn more about the Christian faith. I waited there for several hours, but he never appeared—and he didn’t show up the next day either. Returning to the YMCA on the third day, I sat in the lobby for a while before spotting a couple sorting and arranging the same tracts as Keith had. They were from the same evangelism team, I learned. When I asked about Keith, they told me he had left the country straightaway because of a family emergency. I never saw him again.

After I related my encounter with Keith, we enjoyed a wonderful conversation. They encouraged me by reading from a burgundy leather Bible and asked me to hold it. Initially, I refused because Muslims cannot touch a holy book with unwashed hands.

The couple stressed Luke 9:23–25, where Jesus explains the meaning of denying yourself and taking up your cross. They challenged me: “If you are not willing to die for Jesus, then you are not fit to live for him. He wants you to take up your cross every day.”

I did not realize that within a few weeks, those verses would seriously test my new faith.

Under house arrest

As a new convert, I joined the evangelism team. They discipled me and gave me a pocket-size New Testament to study. I sensed their love and genuine concern. While alone one afternoon, amid a grove of trees away from the congestion, I heard an audible voice: “This is what you will do for the rest of your life. I will take you around the world and you will tell people about Jesus.”

Although fear gripped me, I believed it was God speaking.

By denying Islam, I knew I was courting disgrace from my family and risking an honor killing. At the time, I lived with friends in Lahore who turned furious when I admitted I had accepted Jesus into my life. They wrote to my father, a devout Muslim who prayed five times daily facing Mecca and was discipled by a holy man. Enraged, he rushed to Lahore to confront my apostasy. He enlisted friends to harass me and force me to recant. When that didn’t work, they committed me to a mental facility.

Isolated in the hospital’s psychiatric ward for two weeks, I was sedated and guarded by soldiers. Even so, I gained comfort from covertly reading my smuggled New Testament, and I was able to lead several people to Jesus. God intervened when a psychiatrist verified my sanity and discharged me.

My father was furious. He kept me under house arrest at his home in Multan, in Pakistan’s southern Punjab region. While armed sentries stood guard outside, I was confined for several weeks before I could escape by bus to Christian friends in Lahore. When I learned the police were searching for me, I fled to Karachi to join an evangelism team. Even under duress, my faith grew as I devoured the Bible, memorized Scripture, shared my testimony, and distributed tracts.

Our street evangelism flourished until my father demonstrated his political power in early 1976. The police arrested five of us for anti-Islamic activities. Jammed into a tiny, filthy cell, we slept on vomit-caked blankets on a brick floor and shared a small can for our toilet.

Four of my Christian brothers were from other countries, and they were released within a few days and deported. But my ID card and passport were confiscated. I was warned, “You will leave a Muslim or die.”

The jailers moved me to a ward for political prisoners, where I spent almost one year. Despite the shame and isolation, the Holy Spirit sustained me along with the New Testament I had smuggled in and hidden. The glory of God filled my cell many times. I felt especially encouraged while reading Acts 16:25, which recounts Paul and Silas praying and singing hymns in prison. It was mind-blowing that God counted me worthy to suffer for Jesus.

After threatening my father with litigation in Pakistan’s supreme court, I was released to his control. Under the terms of the settlement, I remained a political prisoner and could not leave the country, own a Bible, or associate with Christians. Living with my father wore me down, especially after getting arrested again for hiding the New Testament under my mattress. (I had occasionally managed to sneak out for fellowship with Christians, despite fearing retribution.)

In 1977, with my father’s pressure to renounce Christianity as relentless as ever—he would threaten to have me beheaded for apostasy—I made the fateful decision to flee Pakistan. There was no other choice.

Underground Christians risked retaliation by hiding me and providing travel funds (I was penniless at the time). They helped me obtain a new passport and visa to Afghanistan. Although the army and police were tracking me, I was able to pass through the Afghan immigration checkpoint, aided by an army officer two Iranian diplomats. I walked across the border in old jeans, lugging a backpack and guitar. The generous Iranians drove me to Kandahar and paid my bus fare to Kabul.

During my seven-month escape journey, God always provided. Openhearted brothers and sisters supported me generously. From Kabul I passed through Turkey, Russia, Belgium, Holland, and finally to Sweden. After I endured some bureaucratic hassles, the government finally granted me political asylum.

Call to missions

Sweden became my new home. I learned the language and joined an evangelical Lutheran church where I met my wife, Brita, whom I married in 1979. I attended Torchbearers International Bible School in Holsby before moving to Uppsala, where I ministered to Muslim immigrants. Brita worked as a nurse, and I found a janitorial position in an office building. I learned God could use me even while I cleaned bathrooms and floors.

Courtesy of Dynamis World Ministries / Edits by CT

All the while, he was preparing me to fulfill the mission he had revealed back in Lahore, to preach Jesus all over the world. We moved to America for further Bible training and returned to Sweden a year later, after which I taught at the Word of Life Training Center in Uppsala for four years.

I was also active in the church and with InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, doing street evangelism and praying for the sick. My call to missions solidified in 1983 in Poland. I accompanied two couples driving a van there loaded with food for needy families. I was asked to preach at Catholic youth camps. Invitations to return followed, setting the stage for large audiences and many young people making commitments to Christ.

Shortly thereafter, I founded Dynamis World Ministries, a precursor to conducting mass evangelistic meetings in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. In 1993 we moved our headquarters to Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Over the past 40 years I have been privileged to preach in more than 75 nations and plant churches in Asia, Eastern Europe, and Africa.

In the account from John’s gospel of Jesus miraculously feeding the 5,000, the original loaves and fishes come courtesy of an unknown boy (6:9). The story reminds us that God can use even the smallest things—and the unlikeliest people—to dramatic effect. When I first became a Christian, my only ambition was doing street-level evangelism and giving out tracts. I’m humbled to see how God has multiplied these efforts, ensuring that more and more people can taste the Bread of Life.

Christopher Alam is the author of Out of Islam: One Muslim’s Journey to Faith in Christ. Peter K. Johnson is a freelance writer living in Saranac Lake, New York.

News

After Physician-Assisted Suicide Bill, Canadian Evangelicals Reassess

Christians joined disability advocates and UN experts to oppose amendment, but failed to stop it.

Christianity Today April 20, 2021
Nathan Denette / AP Images

Canadian evangelicals are decrying a new law that expands access to physician-assisted suicide to people who are sick or disabled but aren’t dying.

“Many of us are quite heartbroken over this,” said Derek Ross, the executive director of Christian Legal Fellowship. “We’re now dealing with a legal system that is making more and more exceptions to the once exception-less principle that you cannot consent to the harm of having your life ended by another person and that all lives are inherently and equally full of worth and value of dignity.”

Physician-assisted suicide—known popularly as “Medical Assistance in Dying” or MAID—has been legal in Canada since 2016. The law was limited to people who were experiencing what the Criminal Code called a “grievous and irremediable medical condition”: an illness, disease, or disability that causes enduring physical or psychological pain that cannot be relieved in any way the patient accepts. To be eligible, the patient also had to be dying.

But in March, the government passed an amendment to the Criminal Code, Bill C-7, that removed the criteria that someone must be dying to receive MAID. Canada now allows people who have an illness or disability to have a physician-assisted suicide, even if their death is not imminent. People who are dying no longer have to wait 10 days. Canada also plans to allow MAID for people whose only medical condition is a mental illness.

“The law is now presenting death as a medical response to suffering in a wide range of cases—not just when somebody is already dying, but at potentially any stage of their adult life,” Ross said. “Instead of prioritizing supports to help people to live meaningful lives, we’ve prioritized ways to make death more accessible. This is a heartbreaking message.”

Evangelicals joined Canadians from many religious traditions in protesting the expansion of physician-assisted suicide. In October 2020, shortly after the bill was introduced, more than 150 religious leaders signed a public letter detailing their opposition, with Baptists, Wesleyans, and Pentecostals joining their names with Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Mormon, Jewish, and Muslim leaders.

The most public opposition came from disability organizations. Evangelicals threw their support to those activists, backing their arguments and attempting to raise their visibility.

“We were very intentional about that,” said David Guretzki, executive vice president and resident theologian at the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada (EFC), an organization that represents evangelicals across the country. “The public has a reticence to talk about religion, or they’re nervous when religious groups speak up. We thought it was better on this issue in particular for us to allow the voices of disability advocacy groups to speak and for us to come alongside and support them.”

The EFC, for example, joined Inclusion Canada, the Council of Canadians with Disabilities, the Disabled Women’s Network of Canada, the Canadian Institute for Inclusion and Citizenship, and 120 other organizations supporting disability rights in an open letter to the members of Parliament. The letter endorsed the concerns of United Nations’ human rights experts who wrote that the proposed amendment would violate the Canadian commitment to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

“From a disability rights perspective,” the UN experts wrote, “there is a grave concern that if assisted dying is made available to all persons with a health condition or impairment, regardless of whether they are close to death, a social assumption might follow (or be subtly reinforced) that is better to be dead than to live with a disability.” the letter says.

A poll commissioned by the faith-based think tank Cardus showed that about a third of the country enthusiastically supports physician-assisted suicide as a basic human right. Nineteen percent oppose. Forty-eight percent are cautiously supportive, but express concern about potential negative impact on vulnerable Canadians. Despite that, and despite the concerted political effort, Bill C-7 passed the House of Commons last month by a vote of 180–149.

Evangelicals aren’t surprised by the result. “Most Christians have come to grips with the fact that we are actually in a pluralistic society in which many of the points of view that they hold are minority perspectives and not majority perspectives,” said Ray Pennings, executive vice president of Cardus.

The next political battle, activists say, will be protecting the rights of doctors and other medical professionals who believe it goes against their religious convictions to participate.

The federal law clearly states that no one should be forced to perform a suicide, but Christian doctors may still be required by their regulatory and licensing colleges to either participate or give a referral, depending on their province or territory they live in, according to Larry Worthen, the executive director of the Christian Medical and Dental Association of Canada.

“Doctors are living in fear of having a complaint against them and being disciplined,” Worthen said. “Doctors are already stressed out because of COVID-19 and concern about their patients and overwork, and you add on top of that fear that the next patient who comes in is going to ask for MAID and report them, and the burden just becomes too great.”

In Ontario, the country’s most-populous province, the courts have said doctors are required to refer patients to medical procedures like physician-assisted suicide or abortion, even if making the referrals violates the doctor’s conscience or goes against their religious beliefs.

According to the EFC, it’s hard to remain optimistic about coming political battles, as the influence of Christian ideas about the value of life decline. About half of Canada identifies as non-religious today, up 30 points in the past 20 years. Only about 20 percent of Canadians attended church at least once a month. But Guretzki said he thinks the situation provides a great opportunity for churches.

“Now that we’ve been pushed out of the center again, much more to the margins, I think we’re actually closer to what the New Testament church was facing,” Guretzki said. “I think we have a chance to learn some new lessons about what it’s like to be a Christian witness when you can’t rely on political or cultural influence to get your message across.”

For church leaders, this means encouraging Christians to love people well and faithfully testify to God’s grace across political differences while still standing up for the vulnerable.

“Our political leaders are not the enemy,” said Steven Jones, president of the Fellowship of Evangelical Baptist Churches in Canada, a denomination with 500 congregations across the country. “For us, they’re the mission field. We love them in the name of Jesus. We need to speak up and let them know there are Canadians that have a different viewpoint.”

Jones said he’s seen more Christians engaging in Canadian politics in recent years, possibly because of a greater sense of marginalization. While some of the energy is focused on religious liberty, and protecting the rights of Christians in society, he said, there needs to be increased concern about marginal social groups who are told their lives are not particularly valuable, Jones said, such as people with disabilities and the elderly.

“We need to be out in the community intentionally coming along and loving people who are marginalized and need the care and love of Jesus,” he said.

Experienced advocates are reminding themselves to stay patient and remain faithful in the face of loses. Victoria Veenstra, justice communications coordinator of the Christian Reformed Church in Canada, said that she views advocacy as a spiritual discipline.

“When we pin all of our hopes on one specific policy, or we expect a policy to change rapidly, we get really burnt out and discouraged,” she said. “We want to see justice now. But if we can keep training ourselves to keep moving towards justice in the long-term, faithfully, steadily, Christ is there with us.”

Veenstra said it’s also important to remember that changing the law is not the only way faithful followers of Jesus can speak up for the value of life.

“This sucks,” she said, “but as Christians, we can still come around people and make MAID a less desirable option.”

Books
Excerpt

It’s Okay to Let Your Mind Wander During Prayer

Those distractions aren’t failures of focus, but opportunities to trust God with the deepest truths of our hearts.

Norbert Kundrak

One evening when I (Kyle) was in seminary, I went with some classmates to a professor’s house. The professor was talking about a pet peeve: when people pray to the wrong person of the Trinity. After a short rant, he suggested we close in prayer. No one spoke a word! After a minute or two, everyone started laughing because we knew what was going on. We had become so self-conscious about praying correctly that no one wanted to pray.

Where Prayer Becomes Real: How Honesty with God Transforms Your Soul

Where Prayer Becomes Real: How Honesty with God Transforms Your Soul

Baker Books

224 pages

It is all too easy to focus on praying the right way to the detriment of actually praying. But this is where prayer goes to die. If prayer becomes a place to pray about what we think God wants us to pray about and not what is on our hearts, then we simply won’t do it. In the words of Dominican priest Herbert McCabe, “People often complain of ‘distraction’ during prayer. Their mind goes wandering off to other things. This is nearly always due to praying for something you do not really much want; you just think it would be proper and respectable and ‘religious’ to want it.”

When prayer becomes a kind of performance, it is easy to interpret experiences like having our mind wander as failures. But McCabe touches on something profound. Because we have the Spirit of God in our souls, mind-wandering should not be seen as a random act of an undisciplined intellect. Our minds wander because, in Jesus’ words, “where your treasure is, there your heart will be also” (Matt. 6:21). When we come into God’s presence in prayer, we do so with the Spirit present to the deepest truths of our hearts. We should not be surprised that the truth of our hearts begins to percolate and rise to the surface.

Instead of seeing a wandering mind as a failure, then, we should see an opportunity to pray about the deep longings of our souls. We are tempted to do the opposite: to stop praying and start chastising ourselves over an inability to focus or a failure to pray the “right” way. In these moments, we pause our talking with God because we do not think these are the kinds of things God wants us to talk about. They are our problems. They represent our wandering minds and hearts toward idols, worries, and loves. When these thoughts arise, it helps to pray, “Father, look at this. Look at what my heart does in your presence. Lord, deep in my heart, I long for control to calm my fears and anxieties. Lord, help me trust you with these.”

When we pray, we have to avoid trying to fix our lives or giving ourselves a pep talk on how to rightly talk with God. That is not what prayer is, and this is not where our hope is found. Prayers become boring and lifeless when we wrestle with ourselves in our guilt, anxiety, fear, or shame rather than bring them to God.

Kyle Strobel and John Coe, Where Prayer Becomes Real, Baker Books, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2021. Used by permission of the publisher. www.bakerpublishinggroup.com

Books

New & Noteworthy Books

Compiled by Matt Reynolds.

Money Matters: Faith, Life, and Wealth

R. Paul Stevens and Clive Lim (Eerdmans)

Most people devote a good portion of their waking hours to making and spending money—or wishing they could do more of both. How can we handle financial resources in a way that acknowledges the blessings of wealth but avoids idolatrous traps? In Money Matters, two experts on marketplace theology—one (Lim) who grew up poor, and one (Stevens) whose family was well-off—give biblical, historical, and practical guidance on this theme. “Money grabs at the heart,” they write. “It is not neutral. It is a power. It can be a radioactive issue. We want to have money, but money wants to have us.”

Every Leaf, Line, and Letter: Evangelicals and the Bible from the 1730s to the Present

Edited by Timothy Larsen (IVP Academic)

For all of today’s consternation over the meaning of evangelical, no plausible definition can get around the centrality of the Bible: reading it, preaching it, distributing it, and striving to apply its teachings. And this has been true throughout the movement’s modern history, as a diverse range of scholars make clear in this volume. The essays in Every Leaf, Line, and Letter study the changing shape of evangelical “biblicism” across different eras, places, and cultures. As Baylor University historian Thomas Kidd avers in the book’s introduction, “the uses that evangelicals have made of the Bible are almost as varied as evangelicals themselves.”

Hope Always: How to Be a Force for Life in a Culture of Suicide

Matthew Sleeth (Tyndale Momentum)

Between the travails of the COVID-19 era and recent sociological work charting a troubling rise in “deaths of despair,” it’s clear that the specter of suicide hovers over many in today’s world. In Hope Always, former ER doctor Matthew Sleeth writes to stem this tide, drawing on his Christian faith and hands-on hospital experience to marshal the best interventions that the Bible, medicine, and psychology can offer. “I want those who are depressed among us to live,” writes Sleeth. “I want you to be able to help others to live. We who live in the age of suicide are indeed our brother’s and our sister’s keepers.”

Books
Review

Christians Should Be in the News Cycle, but Not of It

How believers can stay up on the day’s events without becoming prisoners of the moment.

Illustration by Dan Bejar

At Bethel University in Minnesota, where I’m a professor of English and journalism, I often teach a course for college seniors called “What Good is Leisure?” (Many students who sign up mistakenly believe they’re in for a restful three-credit experience.) It’s a course about “the architecture of time,” to use Abraham Heschel’s phrase, and my students this year were more responsive than ever to the flabbiness of their calendar.

Reading the Times: A Literary and Theological Inquiry into the News

Reading the Times: A Literary and Theological Inquiry into the News

IVP Academic

200 pages

COVID-19 had destroyed the rhythm of their weeks. It had beckoned them to spend hours doom-scrolling on social media, while giving them nothing to look forward to. They felt guilty and frustrated about what T. S. Eliot, in one of his poems, called “the waste sad time / Stretching before and after” their experiences of quarantine.

In reality, the pandemic has merely intensified the challenges of community, attention, and time that Jeffrey Bilbro addresses in his fine new book, Reading the Times. The underlying problem is this: We are learning to love the wrong things. Our news feeds are miseducating our desires. Whether our favorite media lean left or right—and even if we sample from both sides—we are becoming prisoners of the news cycle. Far from achieving the enlightenment we need to interpret our times, we are bloated from bingeing on our daily media buffet.

Although Bilbro’s subtitle is A Literary and Theological Inquiry into the News, he denies that the media is the source of the problem. Instead, he blames the bad habits we bring into our encounters with the news. These habits manifest themselves in three ways: associating too much with those who interpret daily events as we do, rather than with actual communities; developing a taste for sugary, unsubstantial entertainment, rather than giving attention to significant works of art, literature, and journalism; and submitting to the charms of the moment, rather than seeking to understand time within the sweep of God’s divine drama.

These three areas—community, attention, and time—form the three sections of Bilbro’s book. Each section analyzes one area and concludes with practical suggestions, or “liturgies” (as he calls them), to reshape our habits.

Reading and belonging

Reading the Times is written primarily for North American Christians who are concerned and bewildered by the events of the past several years—which probably includes you, right? Bilbro’s style is accessible, and though he drops into the occasional philosophical byway, he shows the way out as well.

We are often told that the solution to our democratic challenges is an improved media. In other words, we need more fact checkers, more diverse sources, higher journalistic standards, or a return to the Fairness Doctrine, which used to require broadcasters to air competing points of view. To be sure, Bilbro helpfully lists the media he trusts at the end of the book. But the surprising heart of his analysis comes in his section on community: “Our thinking,” he writes, “is downstream from our communal belonging. Instead of looking to the news to create better communities, we should be looking to strengthen communities so that they can create better news.”

Bilbro argues convincingly that our media choices create de facto communities—artificial communities, really—and that we need to question our identification with them. He quotes Turkish writer and sociologist Zeynep Tufekci’s observation that “belonging is stronger than facts.”

To illustrate, he observes the travel cruises hosted by media organizations like National Review and NPR. The New York Times beckons you to join “like-minded travelers on journeys around the world.” My Minnesota affiliate of NPR endlessly proclaims its journalistic balance—but my informal 2008 count of cars with a bumper sticker for both Minnesota Public Radio and a presidential candidate showed this result: Obama 26, McCain 0. I just hope they don’t overload the port side during their cruise.

Bilbro claims that we’re susceptible to “alternative facts” when we belong more to our favorite media than to the places and communities where we live. I think he’s right. On the other hand, the role of media in overcoming American individualism and creating public spirit has been noticed as far back as Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (1840), and Bilbro by no means discounts its positive role. He reads The Atlantic, The American Conservative, Christianity Today, First Things, and Commonweal, along with online sources such as the Rabbit Room, Christ and Pop Culture, and Front Porch Republic (where he serves as editor). He listens to NPR, Mars Hill Audio Journal, and The Witness. But he strongly recommends that we also read local media. “The point here is to avoid consuming the news as an isolated spectator,” he writes. Instead, he wants readers to integrate their use of media into their actual involvement with real, local communities.

This brings me to a criticism of his otherwise strong section on community. He writes convincingly that national media have gained power because other forms of communal identity—such as “family, place, ethnic group, [and] religious tradition”—have weakened. For his likely audience, I believe Bilbro could have stressed the foundational element of religion more strongly.

Religion isn’t just one element among many. To simplify an insight from German Catholic philosopher Josef Pieper (whom Bilbro quotes several times): You can’t have a vibrant culture if you separate it entirely from religious practice. To go even further back, sociologist Emile Durkheim thought the very social character of human beings was created by religious observance. Bilbro’s book is deeply biblical and theologically astute. It doesn’t seek to be evangelistic—still less, polemical. Even so, I think this is a favorable time to explain the centrality of religion in our civic formation.

That brings me to time itself, the subject of the central section in Bilbro’s book. The communities to which we belong are also the places where we spend our time. One of his crucial themes is the distinction between two meanings of time, from the Greek words chronos and kairos. The news cycle runs according to chronos, which he explains as the chronological sequence of events. It is sequential and linear, always progressing forward. Kairos refers to the opportune moment for repeated acts, such as planting and harvest. It is cyclical and accommodates little that is new or changing.

Neither of these approaches is complete on its own, he writes: The adherents of chronos believe they can discern a “right side of history”—namely, their own—while cultures shaped solely by kairos often show little care for the day-to-day experiences of their people. Our task as Christians, writes Bilbro, is to read the times in light of “the crucified and risen Word … to discern how [God] might be calling us to participate in his ongoing work of redemption.”

Bilbro’s biblical examplar of such a relation to time is the prophet, who participates in both chronos and kairos but whose ear attends to the Word of God. In the practical, “liturgies” part of this section, he offers suggestions for reviving the liturgical year and the “daily office” of prayer from historic Christian traditions.

I’m surprised that he doesn’t mention the most obvious and accessible mode of reordering time: the revival of Sabbath practice. Jews relish the saying, attributed to the Hebrew writer Ahad Ha’am, that “more than Jews have kept Shabbat, Shabbat has kept the Jews.” This saying holds deep significance for Christians too—not just as individuals but as communities.

My students have responded favorably to books on Sabbath by Abraham Heschel and the Christian spiritual writer Mark Buchanan, but by far their favorite activity from my “Leisure” course is creating a 24-hour, digital-free Sabbath. They use words like “liberated” and “free” to describe their experience, and they inevitably describe richer conversations, more fulfilling exercise and hobbies, and even more satisfying mealtimes.

Redirecting our attention

The other section of Reading the Times centers on “attention.” Coming early in the book, this section asks readers what they are attending to, listening to, and reading. From the very beginning, Bilbro introduces us to great works of literature that he’s been reading and art that he’s been viewing. In some ways, the entire book is a tour of Bilbro’s reading. In this respect, it is similar to Alan Jacobs’s recent book Breaking Bread with the Dead. Both books try to help readers reshape their desires, first by providing a critique of today’s information overload and its tendency to reinforce the prejudices of the present day; and second, by redirecting our attention to works of the past that have prophetic resonance for our day.

Bilbro’s treatment of his key authors and artists is one of the book’s great pleasures. He opens with Henry David Thoreau, who warned that “the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things.” Sustained treatments of Thomas Merton, Wendell Berry, Dante, Marc Chagall, and Pieter Bruegel the Elder punctuate the text. Throughout, his engagement with current and past commentators is intelligent, fair, and irenic.

Bilbro closes his analysis with treatments of Frederick Douglass and Dorothy Day. Both founded publications that “sought to create the news from the perspective of [oppressed and marginalized] communities,” he writes. By joining their efforts with those of fellow Christians, they gradually created communities of readers whose shared practices served as faithful, public manifestations of the gospel.

Since I began reading the book, I noticed conversation after conversation in which my friends, colleagues, and students connected the frustrations of the past year to the things vying for their time and attention and to the increased pressures on the communities they love. With Reading the Times, Bilbro has brought those frustrations to the surface, analyzed them well, and given us hopeful ways to confront them.

Daniel E. Ritchie is professor of English and journalism at Bethel University in St. Paul, Minnesota.

Books
Review

Christians Can Learn from Muslims. But There Are Lines We Shouldn’t Cross.

One writer’s attempt to relate Islam to her faith yields some lessons along with some stumbles.

Illustration by Rick Szuecs / Source images: Ahmed Nishaath / Ben White / Unsplash / Envato Elements / Wikimedia Commons

During the COVID-19 pandemic, we’ve witnessed firsthand how painful, exhausting, and occasionally frightening it is to live among people who passionately disagree. In this maelstrom of masks, quarantines, vaccines, and lockdowns, we’ve often forgotten how to love our brothers, sisters, and neighbors, to say nothing of our enemies.

Pillars: How Muslim Friends Led Me Closer to Jesus

Pillars: How Muslim Friends Led Me Closer to Jesus

Plough Publishing House

280 pages

This makes me all the more thankful for the example set by Rachel Pieh Jones in her new book Pillars: How Muslim Friends Led Me Closer to Jesus. As committed Christians and American expatriates living in East Africa, Jones and her family have built a life on the borders of one of the most fractious relationships in human history: Islam and Christianity.

In Pillars, Jones writes about experiencing the “friction” of expatriate life. She describes finding the faith of her Muslim neighbors “rubbing against the box in which I restricted God and my spiritual life.” The book is structured, as Jones puts it, around “Islam’s five pillars—shahadah, or confession of faith; salat, prayer; zakat, almsgiving; Ramadan, fasting; and hajj, pilgrimage,” and she explores how all five can connect with and critique Christian practices. She relates her story without universalizing her experience, but we can learn much from her example.

Jones allows the teachings of Islam to challenge her own religious practices. For instance, the Muslim practice of involving the whole body in the ritual salat prayers (through actions like kneeling and bowing) emphasizes that “God’s presence permeates all of life, that space between spiritual and physical does not exist.” This moved her to adopt a new posture of prayer, one characterized by desperation for God rather than any attempt to control her circumstances.

Similarly, the practice of zakat forced her to grapple honestly with her relationship with the poor, as well as to admit to a kind of implicit “prosperity gospel” that demanded God’s blessings in exchange for the sacrifices of expat life.

These kinds of comparisons might seem transgressive, yet Christ himself often held up the actions of the unbeliever in order to challenge the beliefs of the orthodox. Jesus was not doctrinally illiterate; he knew that Samaritan beliefs were heretical. His conversation with the Samaritan woman at the well indicates as much: “You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews” (John 4:22). And yet, when asked to describe the love necessary to inherit eternal life, Jesus told a story not of Jewish orthopraxy but of Samaritan compassion (Luke 10:25–37).

In other instances, Jones looks for points of contact between the two faiths. She relates how attempting a Ramadan fast revived her appreciation for fasting as a Christian discipline, for “enduring a period of self-denial” that “deepened the conviction that everything was a gift, a mercy, from God.” Moreover, the communal nature of Ramadan informed her perspective on the Lord’s Supper as not “only a sign or symbol of inclusivity or exclusivity” but also “an invitation to relationship.” The Lord’s Supper does, of course, draw a clean dividing line between Christians and non-Christians, but as a symbol of the gospel and the unity of the church, it also contains an invitation for non-Christians to move from outside to inside the family of God.

Admittedly, all Christians will stumble whenever they attempt to apply their faith to particular circumstances, and at times, I would suggest Jones does so. At one point, she recounts taking part in the salat prayers of her Muslim friends, praying in the name of Jesus alongside them. And in her discussion of the hajj, she tells the story of accepting water sacred to Muslims from the Well of Zamzam in Mecca. In both cases, her goal is demonstrating solidarity with her friends as fellow humans seeking the divine. And yet I would argue that each gesture goes too far and risks confusing the biblical message of Christ’s exclusivity.

At other times, the theological connections she draws between Islam and Christian practice are tenuous at best. She compares, for example, the practice of washing before salat (wudu) to baptism: “Nothing in the water will render them pure or righteous, but the desire is intimacy with God and a public declaration of faith.” This observation could certainly form the basis of a gracious interfaith conversation between friends (which, in fairness, is likely her primary purpose). But that doesn’t make it any less doctrinally problematic. The outward form of these practices is certainly similar, but their theological meanings are very different: While baptism is an act of obedience, wudu and salat are good works commanded in order to earn merit for salvation.

Nevertheless, while I might disagree with some of Jones’s specific choices, I can wholeheartedly support the book’s larger purpose. She is attempting to establish the exact kind of mutual understanding that is essential for contextualizing and communicating the gospel. Far too often, the knowledge that we have been entrusted with the words of eternal life (John 6:68–69) makes Christians more proud than humble. In our zeal to convince unbelievers, we so easily neglect the command to “honor everyone” (1 Pet. 2:17, ESV), including those who reject the gospel message.

And even if Jones’s techniques will prove too problematic for missiological use, then let us at least emulate her attitude within the church itself. Jones makes it clear that we shouldn’t confuse her respect for Muslims with an endorsement of their beliefs. Yet despite inevitable areas of disagreement, she writes, “we are people of faith. We can communicate.” In the same way, Christians today differ over questions that won’t be resolved through neglect or denial. Yet these must not prevent us from displaying the kind of love that shows the world we are Christ’s disciples (John 13:35).

As Jones says, “Peace is not denial that we hold different things precious. Peace is not avoiding disagreement. Peace is mutual respect.” Pillars might not be the missiological text for the stringently orthodox missionary, but it could be a gentle reminder of how to fight, through weariness and pain, to love our neighbors, be they Muslim or Christian.

Jaclyn S. Parrish is a writer living in Fort Worth. She is director of marketing at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary.

Books

Reading God’s Word like a Poem, Not an Instruction Manual

The Bible teaches us, says Matthew Mullins, but its method of teaching always entails more than information and guidance.

Alex Boerner

The Bible has much to say about its own purpose and authority. Among the most famous passages in this vein is 2 Timothy 3:16–17, where Paul writes, “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.”

Enjoying the Bible

Enjoying the Bible

Baker Academic

224 pages

For Matthew Mullins, associate professor of English and history of ideas at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, verses like these are indispensable guides for how believers should read God’s Word. But the trouble comes, he argues, from an overly narrow conception of words like teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training that can tempt us to treat the Bible purely as an instruction manual for what to believe and how to behave.

In Enjoying the Bible: Literary Approaches to Loving the Scriptures, Mullins shows how the Bible’s method of instruction touches both the head and the heart. It works, in other words, much like poetry and other types of literature, informing our minds and stirring our emotions in ways that can’t be completely untangled. Jessica Hooten Wilson, an author and University of Dallas scholar specializing in theology and literature, spoke with Mullins about poetry as a gateway to greater enjoyment of God and his Word.

Who are you hoping to reach with this book?

I’m trying to reach anyone who might say, “I want to pick up this ancient, diverse, awesome text and enjoy my reading of it.” I’m writing to my Christian evangelical students and friends—people who, like myself, tend to think of the purpose of Scripture in a way that privileges information and instruction above enjoyment.

And if I’m being honest, I’m also writing the book to myself, as someone who, on a visceral level, enjoys bingeing on Netflix more than digging into the Bible. I look forward to the newest album from my favorite band more than I look forward to reading the Gospels. I know it’s not supposed to be that way, but it is. So writing this book was also a spiritual exercise.

You use the word enjoy in your book title. What do you mean by “enjoying” the Bible—can you enjoy it in the same way you enjoy Netflix?

My original title for the book was along the lines of, “You can’t understand the Bible if you don’t love poetry.” It was a bit more polemical than where we ultimately settled. But on a basic level, by “enjoying” the Bible, I mean something quite like taking pleasure in it. My conviction, however, isn’t that we should enjoy the Bible as an end in itself. Ideally, by learning to enjoy it, we cultivate a greater enjoyment of God himself.

Why do you suppose so many believers have a hard time taking pleasure in reading Scripture?

Like me, most of my students were raised in churches that hold the Bible in extremely high regard. In part, this is because we like to believe it can act like an instruction manual, giving practical guidance on what we’re supposed to do in life: Am I supposed to go to college? Am I supposed to go to this church or that church? Am I supposed to marry this person or that person? When you’re going through the Bible just looking for answers to those kinds of questions, that’s going to rob you of your joy in reading. You’ll constantly be anxious about whether you’re reading it the right way.

In my introduction, I talk about how we tend to think of the Bible as this unified thing, when in fact it’s this crazily diverse collection of genres and literary forms. As a result, we misunderstand how to go about reading it. What I’m trying to do in the book is to change our understanding of what the Bible is—and also to change our understanding of what it would mean to understand it.

If the Bible isn’t an instruction manual, then what sort of book is it? And what sort of approach should we take in reading it?

I would say that the Bible is not only an instruction manual—even when we’re reading some of the most poetic passages in the Wisdom Literature, we can still draw direct instruction from them, at least at times. My point is that if we’re only looking for practical, what-should-I-do-with-my-life lessons, then we’re missing out on a huge dimension of what it means to let these passages instruct us. They’re not just trying to instruct our intellects. They’re also trying to instruct our desires and our emotions. That’s where the literary component comes in.

In my introduction, I use the example of Psalm 119:105: “Your word is a lamp for my feet, a light on my path.” There’s a clear intellectual instruction: that you should consult God’s Word at times of uncertainty. My argument is that if this were the sum total of what the psalm intends to communicate, then it would have done so in straightforward, instructional language. But instead, it uses this amazing poetic, metaphorical language that instills in us the idea of longing.

Being instructed by this text, then, is more than a matter of being trained to know what to do. It’s also a matter of being trained to desire the text itself, which is an essential part of the “instruction” it gives. What I’m trying to do is more radical than saying that the Bible is instruction plus these other things—longing, desire, delight. I’m saying that the Bible’s form of instruction itself always entails these other things.

How can reading poetry train us to read the Bible with this kind of desire and delight?

Our struggle with poetry isn’t just a sign that we don’t know what to do with the Bible. It’s a sign that we don’t always completely understand what kind of creatures we are. The reason poetry is so valuable and effective at retraining our eyes and our reading habits is that it frequently frustrates our desire to reduce what we’ve read to a simple message or a clear instruction.

When I was first studying the poetic parts of the Bible, I hated that element of frustration. But now I welcome it. I think, “Maybe there’s something I’m not seeing right way. Maybe there’s something in my reading and my thinking that needs to change.”

Poems demand more attention than ordinary prose. Every time you return to a poem, there’s always something else—and something else, and something else. If that’s true of a finite human text, it’s even truer of biblical texts that have survived for ages and that continue to radically transform people’s lives.

One of the practices you dwell on is contemplative Bible reading. What do Protestant Christians, who might be unfamiliar with such traditions, have to gain from approaching Scripture in this manner?

I was raised to hold the Bible in high regard. My father held a divinity degree, and he worked in a church. On Sunday mornings, as well as Wednesday and Sunday nights, we listened to the expositional preaching of God’s Word. I went to a Baptist college that was conservative theologically and took the Bible as authoritative. That’s a part of my tradition I hold dear.

And yet, as someone coming from this more conservative evangelical tradition, I’m hoping to provide something like a gateway or baby steps into these more reflective and contemplative practices, like lectio divina. The more we can change the way we think of biblical interpretation, to read Scripture the way we might read poetry, the more we’ll be able to contemplate its beauty and feel its pull on our emotions, rather than just mining it for instruction.

This has the added effect of loosening our grip on certainty, ever so slightly, and making us more humble readers—even as we remain fully committed to the Bible’s authority.

If the Bible should touch our emotions when we read, then how can we know whether those emotions are trustworthy? Isn’t it possible they could distort rather than sharpen our understanding?

I certainly don’t want to claim that emotion is somehow the foundation of understanding. Nor do I believe that the truth is, in some way, a recipe made up of this much emotion plus this much imagination plus this many facts.

That said, I do believe that elements of beauty and emotion come into play as we read the Bible, in specific and practical ways. Whenever we’re reading a work of literature—even the Bible itself—the words on the page appeal to our imaginations. This happens for countless readers across various backgrounds and life experiences.

This, to me, is where truth and beauty come together. Once our imaginations have been fired, we’re able to connect or relate to the literary work in ways that unite feeling and knowledge inseparably. And that’s where true understanding happens.

In modern Christianity, largely through the Enlightenment, we’ve inherited an overly rationalistic framework. I’m pushing back against that. We don’t need to set aside our emotions to understand things. In fact, setting them aside can hinder that very process.

The narrative of Scripture is set in a different time and place than our own. How can poetry and literature help us grapple with the unfamiliar?

One function of poetry and literature is helping us connect across different experiences by inviting us to identify with worlds that are alien to our own.

In the book, I explore the work of Anne Bradstreet, an early Puritan poet. In Bradstreet’s poem The Author to Her Book, she likens the work of writing to the work of being a mother. Even though I’ve never been a mother, I have occasionally experienced something of the vulnerability and self-doubt that Bradstreet describes about her work as both an author and a mother. I can identify with her, then, even though our experiences might be dramatically different. Good literature creates an atmosphere that fosters these kinds of connections across time and place.

It’s important to caution that perfect empathy—seeing the world from someone else’s point of view in a full and complete way—is impossible. And attempting to identify with someone across broadly divergent experiences can sometimes lead us to draw false equivalences. But literature still has great power to inform our imaginations about unfamiliar things.

If you could leave your readers with one takeaway, what would it be?

If I could have one desired outcome, it’s that people reading this book would experience a different mode of reading the Bible. What I’ve found in my teaching experience is that poetry and literature can make us better Bible readers.

But that’s not the endpoint. Being better Bible readers makes us better lovers of God—and, in turn, better lovers of our neighbors.

Books

Michael Lindsay: Our Lives Are Full of ‘Hinge Moments.’ Here’s How We Can Pray and Prepare.

The incoming Taylor University president outlines a faith-filled, Spirit-guided approach to life’s biggest transitions.

Gantas Vaiciulenas / Unsplash / Edits by Rick Szuecs

Sociologist and incoming Taylor University president D. Michael Lindsay has spent much of his career researching leaders at the highest levels of American society, producing landmark studies like Faith in the Halls of Power: How Evangelicals Joined the American Elite. In his latest book, Hinge Moments: Making the Most of Life’s Transitions, Lindsay turns his attention toward a subject affecting people of all ages and stations: the crucial decisions and turning points that shape who we are and what we’ll become. Leadership author and teacher Angie Ward spoke with Lindsay (a member of CT’s board of directors) about preparing for, responding to, and allowing God to work through the various hinge moments in our lives.

Hinge Moments: Making the Most of Life's Transitions

Hinge Moments: Making the Most of Life's Transitions

IVP

176 pages

Why did you write this book, and who is it for?

I originally wrote the book for high school and college students, to help them prepare for big decisions in life: finding a mate, figuring out your vocational calling, maybe deciding where to go for college or graduate school. But as I got into it, I realized that all of us experience hinge moments throughout our lives. And when the coronavirus pandemic hit, I recognized that our entire society has been facing a kind of existential hinge moment, with ripple effects that are going to be with us for a while. As a result, I realized there is a lot this book can say to a broader audience.

Define what you mean by a “hinge moment.”

Just like hinges on a door allow the door to open or close, so also there are a few hundred moments of our lives that have a disproportionate impact.

These are moments when big decisions are made: You ask someone to marry you, or you get a big job, or your spouse is diagnosed with cancer. They are pregnant with promise and peril. You could say that much of the rest of your life hinges on what happens in them. The more thoughtful we can be going into these moments and the more prayerful we can be as we process them, the better off we’ll be as we pass from one hinge moment to another over the course of a life.

In the book, you differentiate between change and transition. How would you describe the difference?

Change is something that happens to us at a specific moment in time. You get a job. You move to a new city. Your child dies of terminal cancer. Transition is a much longer process. It’s the internal way that we process these significant changes. There are aspects of this process that begin to work in our souls in the weeks, months, even years before a hinge moment occurs. And of course there are ripple effects that work outward in the weeks, months, and years after that.

You describe seven stages of transition: discernment, anticipation, intersection, landing, integration, inspiration, and realization. Which of these trips people up the most?

Without a doubt, the intersection phase is the hardest one. It’s the state of being betwixt and between, what is known as “liminal space.” It’s this very precarious moment when you are most vulnerable, where you have the fewest sources of support and encouragement. It’s the moment between being fired from a job and being hired at another. Or it’s the space between when a loved one is given a serious medical diagnosis and is either cured of the illness or ends up dying from it.

Sometimes that intersection phase can last days or weeks, but often enough it lasts months or even years. It is those crucible seasons that have the most profound impact in shaping who we are, largely through how we respond to the dilemma or the uncertainty at hand. We have to rely upon our close friends and immediate family members, and maybe a few trusted advisers or mentors. The people who walk alongside us in those periods of intersection—those liminal phases—end up making the difference in how we thrive in days ahead.

You’ve mentioned how spouses, family members, and close friends are involved in these stages. What role does the Holy Spirit play?

I really believe that the Holy Spirit is guiding us through all the phases of transition I describe. I’ve found in my own journey that there was a sense of restlessness as I began anticipating or thinking about a possible change. It was happening at sort of a visceral, preconscious level. I wasn’t actually thinking about a change, but my spirit was anticipating something.

Each of us is already in the preparation phase for the next hinge moment; we just don’t realize it yet. Part of the process is building into our lives practices and disciplines that allow us to be attentive to the Holy Spirit’s leading. One thing I’ve learned while writing this book is the value of listening and being attentive to the voice of God. And that requires regular disciplines of prayer and Sabbath-keeping, of solitude and accountability. It means having friendships with people who can remind you of the big picture and what you’re trying to do.

In the book, you talk about prediction and preparation. What’s the difference, and how do they relate to one another?

So much of the American lifestyle is about prediction. Certainly, if we think about our professional lives, we’re all about trying to maximize the possible benefits. We go to grad school to get a degree because we think that will make us more employable and set us up for more and better opportunities.

But we have to remind ourselves that God does not call us to a life of success; he calls us to a life of faithfulness. So our approach should be, “God, I want to be prepared for what you’re calling me to do next,” whether or not that means I get a big raise or the loudest applause. Life does not consist of the bullet points we build on a résumé. We have to be open, vulnerable, and willing to entertain the possibility that God’s calling might be different than we supposed.

We often wish we could know God’s whole plan for our lives right now. But what do you think would happen if we did?

I can say, from my own journey, that if I had known ahead of time all of the challenges, obstacles, and disappointments I would experience in my adult life, there’s no way I would have made the same choices. I would have been far more risk-averse. But of course that would have meant missing out on the upside of all of those setbacks: the many moments of extraordinary redemption and blessing. God in his providence doesn’t reveal the fullness of our lives. Instead, he gives it to us moment by moment, in small doses that we can metabolize and handle. He walks alongside us in those moments of great sadness and disappointment, but he also prepares our hearts and our minds to embrace the redemptive mercies he has in store.

I have a special-needs daughter, Elizabeth. Virtually every day for the last seven years I’ve prayed for a supernatural healing, and it has yet to come. And yet I can see extraordinary ways that the Lord has blessed my life because she is part of our family. Had I seen the full picture beforehand, I’m not sure I would have been willing to take the risk or embrace all that comes with it. Yet the Lord has used it to refine me: to make me a better person, and to shape me into a better follower of Jesus.

Ideas

Diplomacy with Iran Requires Biblical Wisdom. The US Has Chosen Foolishness.

Staff Editor

“The mouths of fools are their undoing, and their lips are a snare to their very lives.” (Proverbs 18:7)

Christianity Today April 20, 2021
Illustration by Mallory Rentsch / Source Images: Majid Saeedi / Stringer / Pool / Getty Images / WikiMedia Commons

Diplomacy in his administration, President Joe Biden promised on the campaign trail, would become “the premier tool of our global engagement.” So it should be: Diplomacy is the first and best option for foreign policy, the norm and barest necessity of international relations. Across the political spectrum, from the most aggressive hawk to the most committed pacifist, we can agree on the value of diplomacy as a means of keeping peace and advancing US interests abroad without resorting to costly violence.

For all that broad acclaim, however, policymakers in Washington have a bad habit of misunderstanding how diplomacy works. They too often seem to conceive of it as a reward for desired behavior rather than a practical means for achieving those ends. “Do what we want,” Washington says, “and then we can talk.” Maximalist demands, coercive sanctions, reckless public insults, and hasty reactions are more characteristic of US diplomacy than the patience, persistence, prudence, and mutually beneficial compromises needed for the task. Our government’s diplomatic efforts are frequently wildly undiplomatic, resembling nothing so much as Proverbs’ characterization of the fool.

The fool, Proverbs tells us, is willfully ignorant and is unwilling to accept others’ advice, learn from mistakes, or heed correction.

Most of Proverbs is attributed to Solomon, a king known for his wisdom. The fool, Proverbs tells us, is willfully ignorant (Prov. 1:22) and is unwilling to accept others’ advice (12:15), learn from mistakes (26:11), or heed correction (13:18). The fool is always “chattering,” unable to keep silent even though foolish words bring “ruin” (10:10). Fools are hotheaded (14:16) and “show their annoyance at once” (12:16). While “the prudent overlook an insult” (12:16) and “avoid strife,” fools are “quick to quarrel” (20:3) and prone to provocation (27:3). “Fools mock at making amends for sin”; they operate without goodwill (14:9). Fools are often unaware of their self-inflicted danger (14:16), but that oblivion is no security for their associates: “A companion of fools suffers harm” (13:20).

Perhaps the most glaring example of this proverbial foolishness in US diplomacy right now is the shambles of US-Iran relations. To see how Washington has played the fool here, a quick rehearsal of recent history is first in order.

In 2015, after two years of negotiations, the United States, Iran, the European Union and five other countries signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal. The pact constrained Iran’s nuclear activities to levels well below what would be needed to construct nuclear weapons. It also provided for independent inspections of Iranian nuclear facilities.

The JCPOA was never meant to be a full overhaul of Iran’s governance or even its foreign policy. The terms of the pact were kept narrow—some even time-limited. Yet if this deal were successful, it could become a basis for further talks to address other Iranian military buildup (especially ballistic missiles), as well as Tehran’s regional troublemaking and maybe, eventually, its domestic oppression, too.

And the deal was successful: Iran complied. Those independent inspections repeatedly had Tehran keeping its side of the bargain, as the Obama and Trump administrations both certified. But in 2018, thinking he could force Iran to accept a more expansive pact, then-President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the deal. He re-imposed sanctions on Iran that the JCPOA had lifted (a policy dubbed “maximum pressure”) and tried to make other signatories—the United Kingdom, France, Germany, China, Russia, and the EU—do likewise.

Iran spent a year maintaining compliance though it no longer received many of the JCPOA’s promised benefits. When it became apparent the US exit wouldn’t be quickly resolved, Iran began gradually breaching the deal’s constraints in the summer of 2019. Next, French-mediated talks fell through in the fall of 2019 after Trump followed a private agreement to reduce sanctions with a public announcement of more sanctions. Since then, nuclear negotiations have stalled, with both countries preoccupied by COVID-19 and Iran reportedly determined to lay low until after the US presidential election.

Biden came into office this year having promised new attention to diplomacy as well as a return to the nuclear deal on condition of renewed Iranian compliance with its terms. Less than two weeks after his inauguration, Iran offered a proposal meeting Biden’s stipulation: a simultaneous US and Iranian return to the JCPOA managed by the European Union.

Biden refused. He also shot down a similar plan from European diplomats. The reasoning? The usual: Do what we want, and then we can talk. The administration has now agreed to indirect talks with Iran via European intermediaries, but the insistence that Iran return to full compliance first hasn’t changed.

The imperious posture of two consecutive US administrations is shortsighted and garrulous.

This is foolishness. The Iranian government deserves ample critique—not least for its treatment of religious minorities—but Tehran didn’t initiate this conflict. Washington did. The imperious posture of two consecutive US administrations is shortsighted and garrulous. It seeks strife instead of avoiding it. It rejects Iran’s attempts to revive goodwill and make amends. Our government has an opportunity to reverse and learn from a mistake but is choosing provocation instead. And we, a “companion of fools” in our government, could be harmed as a result.

That risk will continue in our foreign policy until our leaders learn a less foolish diplomacy. Iran is a comparatively small and weak nation—its entire GDP (around $450 billion) is less than our defense department budget (around $700 billion).

But many foreign policy experts anticipate conflict with China and/or Russia will be the focus of this century. That would mean far higher stakes and an even more urgent need for wisdom in our diplomacy. US policymakers should be imitating the prudence of Joseph as governor of Egypt (Gen. 41:46–57), the winsomeness of Daniel in the Babylonian court (Dan. 1), and the canniness of Paul when he was arrested in Jerusalem (Acts 22:23–29).

That means putting aside childish displays of power and arrogant commands. “American foreign policy must make greater allowance for the use of influence beyond military or economic threats,” CT editorialized about Iran in 2008. “The lips of fools bring them strife, and their mouths invite a beating,” says Proverbs 18:6–7, “The mouths of fools are their undoing, and their lips are a snare to their very lives.” We are fortunate enough to be able to hear that warning metaphorically most of the time, but in foreign policy, the danger of foolishness is real.

Bonnie Kristian is a columnist at Christianity Today.

addApple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseellipseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squarefolderGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastprintremoveRSSRSSSaveSavesaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube