News

Let It Snow

Ruling on pollution of sacred mountain may weaken religious freedom.

The Supreme Court refused in June to review a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision allowing the U.S. Forest Service to use recycled sewer water to make snow for a ski resort on a mountain held sacred by Native Americans. Several tribes hold religious ceremonies on the federally owned mountain; they argued the sewer water would desecrate the mountain and their worship.

Had the Supreme Court taken the case, it would have set a national standard for how carefully the government treats religious practice, said Carl H. Esbeck, law professor at the University of Missouri. Congress has passed two laws in the past two decades (the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act in 1993, and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act in 2000) that guarantee that the government will “not substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion.” Cases under both laws have made their way to the circuit courts, where judges are attempting to interpret Congress’s intent.

“The Ninth [Circuit] said ‘substantial effect’ arises only when you are denied a benefit, like Medicare, or if you suffer a government sanction, like being put in jail, because of your beliefs,” said Steven Jamar, professor at the Howard University School of Law.

In this case, Native Americans were not physically prohibited from worshiping on the mountain, and the court held that “a government action that decreases the spirituality, the fervor, or the satisfaction with which a believer practices his religion is not what Congress has labeled a ‘substantial burden.'”

At the heart of the problem, Jamar said, is whether the government should take into account how its actions affect both practices and beliefs. “That’s the problem that many of us have with this opinion,” he said. “Clearly, at least to me, this government action of polluting a sacred [mountain] will have a substantial effect on somebody’s practice of [his] religion.”

Native Americans are not the only ones who could lose out under the Ninth Circuit’s standard, said Thomas Berg, professor at the University of St. Thomas School of Law. Legally speaking, a family that rejects a routine autopsy for the body of a loved one is not being sanctioned or denied a benefit. Neither are prisoners who are not given religious literature or a place to worship, or people in a house of worship where the government is eavesdropping.

“I’d rather have the government have to put up a standard that tells if the exercise [of religion] is being substantially affected,” said Jamar.

He said the government should have to consider a broader range of questions: How central is the practice or belief to the religion? How sincere are the participants? What is the history of the practice? How many believers are being affected? How significant is the government interference? How compelling is the government interest?

“I don’t think this lends itself to bright lines,” Jamar said. Instead, deciding cases as they come would be a prudent way to handle the hard-to-define “substantial burden.”

Esbeck, who filed a brief with Berg and other religious liberty law scholars asking the Supreme Court to review the case, said it’s not surprising the court did not do so.

“They get about 4,000 appeals a year and they take 75,” he said. “You can’t read anything into it. But people of any faith should be concerned, because this is somewhat of a green light for those circuits that have come down with a fairly weak standard to continue to do so. And they will.”

Copyright © 2009 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere:

Christianity Today has a special section on religious freedom on our site, including:

Bearing the Cross: Freedom’s Wedge | What you can do to help persecuted Christians. (October 7, 2002)

Desert Deaths | Martyrdoms threaten to displace Christian workers from Yemen. (July 13, 2009)


More Freedom But Not Free | Cuba still ranks low on religious liberty. (July 9, 2009)

See our news section and liveblog for more news updates.

Also in this issue

The CT archives are a rich treasure of biblical wisdom and insight from our past. Some things we would say differently today, and some stances we've changed. But overall, we're amazed at how relevant so much of this content is. We trust that you'll find it a helpful resource.

Cover Story

The Case for Early Marriage

Cover Story

With Parents' Help

Cover Story

The Waiting Game

Cover Story

An Ocean of Sorrow

The Purpose-Driven Job Hunter

News

Career Counseling in Church

Review

CDs on The List

Why Churchless Christianity Doesn't Work

Three Gifts for Hard Times

Readers Write

Books Uncommon and Offbeat

Here We Are to Worship

Review

New Music: Two for the Soul

Review

Putting Worldview in Its Place

Feeding Hope Under a Rogue Regime

The Only 'Christian Nation'

Our Life with God

Editorial

Mega-mirror

My Top 5 Books on Loss

Review

Is Self-Deception Always Bad?

Reasoning Together

Restless, Reformed, and Single

News

Q & A: Robert Duncan

Power Pentecostalisms

News

What's in a Name?

Matter Matters

News

Friend or Foe?

News

Go Figure

We Need Health-Care Reform

News

School's Out Forever

News

Quotation Marks

News

One in the Spirit

News

News Briefs: August 01, 2009

News

Passages

News

The Workers Are Few

News

Desert Deaths

View issue

Our Latest

The Russell Moore Show

Benjamin Watson on Russell Moore

Christian justice, gospel-centered living, and faithful action

The Manosphere Gets Discipline Right and Dependence Wrong

Young men are right to want agency, clarity, and strength. But grit alone cannot carry them.

News

Amid Floods and Heat Waves, Indian Church Fights Climate Change

Christ Church in Kerala tends to its garden while helping its parishioners and neighbors live sustainably.

A Civil War of Words

Evangelical factions can increasingly be identified by our speech. We agree on big issues yet insult and talk past each other.

Justices Debate Christian Therapist’s Challenge to ‘Conversion Therapy’ Ban

Colorado evangelical Kaley Chiles calls the law a violation of her free speech.

Wire Story

Tony Evans Will No Longer Pastor Dallas Megachurch After Restoration

Oak Cliff Bible Fellowship announced that its pastor of 48 years won’t return to leadership. The church expects son Jonathan Evans to succeed him.

You Don’t Have to Be Radical

Most Christians aren’t monks, missionaries, or martyrs. We’re unimpressive and unsatisfactory—yet saved by God’s scandalous grace.

From a Village of Bandits to a Village of the Gospel

Stuartpuram in India’s Andhra Pradesh was once known for its armed robbers. Then the gospel changed them.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube