News

Died: B.J. Thomas, Born-Again Singer Who Clashed with Evangelical Fans

Popular artist professed Jesus and earned five gospel Grammys before turning back to secular music.

Christianity Today June 1, 2021
Michael Ochs Archives / Getty Images / edits by Rick Szuecs

Christian celebrity didn’t sit well with B. J. Thomas. The famous singer of “Raindrops Keep Fallin’ on My Head” and “(Hey Won’t You Play) Another Somebody Done Somebody Wrong Song,” personally loved Jesus. It was Christ’s followers that were the problem.

Thomas, who died May 29 at age 78, had a spiritual awakening in 1976. After his born-again experience, the pop and country singer with 15 singles in the Top 40 charts got off drugs and reunited with his wife, Gloria. He put out a massively successful album of Christian music. And he was confronted by an evangelical culture eager for stars but also instantly, angrily critical of them.

Thomas was hailed as a new evangelical icon and then heckled, booed, and berated by born-again fans who didn’t think he was performing his Christianity right. Other celebrities who have wanted to express their faith in pop music but struggled with the demands of believing fans—including Bob Dylan, Amy Grant, and Justin Bieber—would go through similar experiences in subsequent decades.

“I think it’s a really sad commentary when people who want to refer to themselves as quote-Christians-unquote would want to come out and hear someone just to boo them,” Thomas said in a 2019 interview. “That to me was always tough to deal with, and I just stopped making 100 percent gospel records.”

Thomas’s most public clash came in 1982, after he won his fifth gospel Grammy. He sang a string of his secular hits to an Oklahoma audience of more than 1,800, and a woman started shouting at him to talk about Jesus. He told her he wished Jesus would make her be quiet and then said, “I’m not going to put up with this” and walked off stage. Someone shouted, “You’re losing your witness, B. J.,” and there were scattered boos.

The singer returned to the stage and continued the show, but not before critiquing the fans.

“You people love to get together with your gospel singers and talk about how you lead all the pop singers to the Lord,” he said. “But when you get them in front of you, you can't love them, can you? I've got Jesus, but you can't love me.”

In CCM, Thomas complained that Christians “can’t seem to hear somebody sing. It’s always got to be some kind of Christian cliché or Bible song, or they feel it’s their right before God to reject and judge and scoff.”

Thomas continued to produce gospel records and Christian-themed music for the rest of his career, but he also recorded country and pop hits, including “Whatever Happened to Old Fashioned Love,” “New Looks from an Old Lover,” “Two Car Garage,” and “As Long as We Got Each Other,” the theme song for the sitcom Growing Pains. His shows were primarily secular, with a few religious songs mixed in.

He had, nevertheless, many committed Christian fans who mourned his passing over the Memorial Day weekend.

https://twitter.com/StevenCurtis/status/1399024715616997377
https://twitter.com/DUANEALLEN/status/1398781025971585024
https://twitter.com/thstovall/status/1399135023735914498

Thomas was born on August 7, 1942, in Hugo, Oklahoma. His parents, Vernon and Geneva Thomas, named him Billy Joe. He was raised in Houston, where his childhood was dominated by baseball, music, and his father’s alcoholism.

Thomas became the lead singer for a local band called The Triumphs at 15 and started drinking and doing drugs at the same time. The Triumphs had a hit in 1966 with Thomas’s cover of the Hank Williams’ song, “I’m So Lonesome I Could Cry.”

As a solo artist, Thomas cracked the top 10 charts with a love song in 1968, another love song in 1970, and the surprise hit “Raindrops Keep Falling on My Head,” which appeared during a musical bike-riding interlude in the genre-defying Western Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, starring Paul Newman and Robert Redford. The song won Thomas an Academy Award and spent four weeks in 1970 as the No. 1 song in America.

He had another No. 1 hit in 1975, with the self-aware and self-commenting broken-heart country song, “(Hey Won’t You Play) Another Somebody Done Somebody Wrong Song.”

https://open.spotify.com/embed/track/0zRtBDhwtIFTfoK2HuURbM?si=ac45e4cba200464e
https://open.spotify.com/embed/track/0b7qiL1rLbUUpGXczt7p5T?si=773ecd10a45c4910

Success did not make him happy. In fact, it almost killed him.

As he later recounted in his memoir, cowritten with evangelical author Jerry B. Jenkins, he started doing more and more drugs until he was spending thousands of dollars every day on cocaine, which he supplemented with amphetamines and attempted to balance with Valium and marijuana. His personal relationships became rocky and his public performances irregular. Increasingly, he failed to even show up for concerts.

He overdosed in 1975, taking 80 pills at once. He was surprised when he woke up.

“I remember asking the nurse why I was still alive,” Thomas said. “She responded ‘God must want you to accomplish more here in this world.’”

When he got home on January 27, 1976, his wife, Gloria, told him she had accepted Jesus as her Lord and Savior and introduced him to an evangelical rodeo worker who explained to Thomas how he too could be saved. The man invited Thomas to pray with him, and Thomas poured out his heart to God.

“I began a 20-minute prayer that was the most sincere thing I had ever done in my life,” he later wrote. “I got straight with the Lord everything I could think of, and the bridge between 10 years of hell and a right relationship with God was just 20 minutes.”

According to historian David W. Stowe, Thomas’s conversion inaugurated the “Year of the Evangelical” and launched the phenomenon of “Jesus Rock” with his 1976 album Home Where I Belong, released by Myrrh. It was a No. 1 gospel album, won a Dove Award, won a Grammy, and earned Thomas a $1 million contract with MCA Records.

By the early 1980s, the Christian music circuit could boast a robust list of pop celebrities who confessed Christ, including Dylan, Donna Summer, Little Richard, Al Green, Arlo Guthrie, Noel Paul Stookey, Maria Muldaur, and Bonnie Bramlett. But if Thomas was the first on the scene, he was also the first to grow dissatisfied with the demands of Christian audiences.

“I’m not a Christian entertainer. I’m an entertainer who’s Christian,” he told a newspaper reporter in Wisconsin in 1982. “There is a large section of people who think a Christian singer has to sing Christian songs all the time. … This fall I’m working on getting my pop audiences back.”

In later years, he continued to include religious music in his performances, but he didn’t speak as much about Jesus.

“I might have been presented as a very religious entity in those days,” he told one interviewer, “but I'm not a religious person as we speak. And, I'm not sure that any one religion can serve all humanity.”

Thomas is survived by his wife, Gloria, and their three daughters, Paige Thomas, Nora Cloud, and Erin Moore.

https://open.spotify.com/embed/track/0Z93NOpZH50KIt6Au3fWyx?si=674a100832c449a6
https://open.spotify.com/embed/track/63UGaHEzYItnvWCuHn1LHr?si=5f4bd23801694644
News

Tulsa Church Ledger Preserves Stories of Faith After Historic Massacre

For 100th anniversary, the Museum of the Bible restored the “Book of Redemption.”

Christianity Today June 1, 2021
Courtesy of the Museum of the Bible

The book might look like it’s just a list of names and numbers, but Robert Richard Allen Turner, pastor of Vernon African Methodist Episcopal Church in Tulsa, Oklahoma, knows it’s more than that.

“It’s a ledger of our history that we still need to know today,” Turner said. “It’s a story of faith and folks who had faith in God.”

The city of Tulsa will pause on June 1 to remember the 100th anniversary of a racial massacre. In 1921, white Oklahomans killed hundreds of Black people and completely destroyed a prosperous Black community. When the violence ebbed, Greenwood Avenue—the heart of what was then called America’s Black Wall Street—was rubble. The mob had destroyed four hotels, two newspapers, eight doctor’s offices, seven barbershops, half a dozen real estate agencies, and half a dozen churches. One of the Black houses of worship that was damaged was the African Methodist Episcopal (AME) church, located then at 307 N. Greenwood.

The only thing left of the AME was the basement, and it too had been badly damaged. But the church decided to rebuild, and it kept a ledger of all the people who pledged to help and the money they contributed to the cause.

When Turner looks at that book, he thinks of the biblical genealogies and the Book of Numbers, where God told Moses to write down the names of the people who assisted him and to count and record the names of the people who had escaped bondage in Egypt and the descendants who went through the wilderness to the Promised Land.

“It’s not considered to be one of the sexier, more quoted [parts] of the Bible,” Turner said, “but the history of the genealogy in the Book of Numbers shows you the history of the people.”

The biblical doctrine of creation is foundational to our Christian faith. Questions about creation have an important bearing on our view of the Bible and, therefore, on our view of salvation and the reality of our personal salvation.Because our eternal destiny hinges on the truth of God’s Word, we become very agitated in discussions about the nature of creation, especially when views of origins that seem to undermine the Bible are advanced. For example, the assertion that the earth might be several billion years old commonly provokes a negative emotional reaction. To many Christians, that assertion seems flatly to contradict the Bible. Moreover, it is often claimed that scientists cannot really know the age of the earth anyway.Reconstructing The PastSuch skepticism raises an important question: How is it possible to know anything of the prehistoric past? Non-Christian geologists who have no interest in what the Bible says about the past seek to reconstruct the history of the earth by carefully examining evidence contained in rocks and other geological features. They interpret the evidence in terms of a principle of analogy with the present. They assume that the processes operative during the earth’s past were the same as, or closely analogous to, those operating at the present time, and were based on the same laws that govern the present behavior of nature. When we discover past effects that correspond exactly to effects we observe today, we conclude that the cause of the past effects is like the cause we now observe producing those same effects today.For example, a geologist discovers gravel deposits, layered mudstones containing isolated pebbles, and grooved, polished bedrock surfaces. He interprets this as the result of glacial erosion and deposition simply because such situations are characteristic only of modern-day glaciers.The Matter Of MiraclesGeologists seek to understand the past. Because the Christian geologist believes in the reliability of the Bible when it speaks about the past, he knows that miracles have occurred. Belief in miracles, however, presents him with a methodological problem in reconstructing history. Can the Christian geologist assume the analogy of the past with the present as the non-Christian does? If indeed God, in penetrating history, suspended the ordinary laws and processes of his creation, how then can one possibly distinguish a geological feature formed as a result of a miracle from one formed by ordinary, providentially controlled processes?For example, how can a Christian geologist studying salt deposits in the Dead Sea area ever hope to distinguish a mass of salt formed by the miraculous transformation of Lot’s wife from other salt masses formed by such ordinary processes as the evaporation of saline lakes?More important, suppose that God created the world by means of ordinary processes together with several miracles. The result would be that many geological features would have the appearance of age and development by natural process. How then could a Christian geologist distinguish glacier-produced gravels and polished bedrock surfaces from similar deposits that were created miraculously?Is the Christian geologist “fettered” by his belief in miracles so that he must forever remain skeptical about reconstructing the past from geological features observed today? Or are there biblical guidelines that will enable him to develop a viable method for reconstructing the past?Miracle, Providence, And The BibleScripture teaches that God is a God of order. He is not whimsical or arbitrary. The Bible constantly makes reference to the laws, decrees, and ordinances that he established in his creation (Ps. 104:5–9; Ps. 148:3–6; Job 28:25–27; Job 38:8–11, 33; Prov. 8:27–29; Jer. 5:22, 24; Jer. 31:35–36). God made a “covenant,” so to speak, with his creation so that the constituent elements of the created order—such as day and night, the sun, moon, and stars, seed time and harvest—behave in a regular, periodic manner (Gen. 8:22; Jer. 33:25–26).God appeals to his “covenantal” relationship regarding day and night and the laws of heaven and earth as evidence of his faithfulness to his people Israel (Jer. 33:25–26). This recurrent biblical theme of order and predictability in God’s creation lays the basis for scientific work, making it legitimate to assume the general continuity of law and natural processes throughout time. Like causes generally produce like effects, and so generally, like effects in rocks were produced by like causes.Scripture also plainly teaches that God has miraculously intervened in the ordinary course of events. He performed his miracles, however, for a definite purpose, not simply for man’s entertainment. These miracles occur at crucial junctures in redemptive history: the deliverance from Egypt; the entrance into the Promised Land; the earthly ministry of our Lord; the apostolic age. Miracles called attention to God’s mighty acts of deliverance and attested to the truthfulness of the message of the prophets and apostles. This sparing use of miracles implies that the Christian may interpret most past events in terms of ordinary historical and natural laws and processes. Even the definition of “miracle” demands assumption of a basic uniformity of the laws of nature, in contrast to which, from our human perspective, a miracle is seen as a miracle.I propose this as a proper Christian procedure: We assume we can explain any past event in terms of processes like those of the present operating on the basis of ordinary laws that God established. But we must make an exception to this if it can be demonstrated from Scripture that such an event was miraculous.For example, the Christian historian would not explain the birth of Christ in terms of natural processes because the Bible clearly indicates that a miracle occurred. On the other hand, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, although unusual, could legitimately be explained in terms of natural processes providentially controlled by God. This is so because it cannot be shown that the Bible demands a miraculous event.In any case, the Bible clearly teaches that miracles are the rare exception rather than the rule. Therefore, we have solid biblical grounds for holding that any given geological process or event occurred in the ordinary course of nature unless there is some special reason for a divine miracle. It is also likely that a geological event must have some crucial significance in the history of redemption if we are to explain it as the result of a miracle.So the Christian geologist should attempt to reconstruct earth’s history by interpreting the evidence in rocks and geological features. But he must also assume that the past was fundamentally like the present, with the sparing occurrence of miracles, and with the biblical emphasis on the orderliness of nature as part of God’s providential upholding of his creation.Creation And GeologyHow then should a Christian geologist deal with those rocks and geological features that were formed during the six days of creation? Does he simply describe them, use their resources, and explain them as the product of God’s miraculous fiat? Or, may he legitimately interpret them in terms of present-day processes and laws?Many Christians claim the Bible demands belief in a creation that was studded continuously with miracles. Fiat creation is said to be identical to miraculous creation of various entities so that rocks, trees, lions, stars and the like were created only a few thousand years ago, virtually instantaneously, and in fully mature condition. Thus, lions, trees, and rocks created during the six days were supposedly created with only an appearance of age and historical development. Adherents of this viewpoint maintain that it is illegitimate to reconstruct the past from the evidence of ancient rocks by using any principle of analogy with present processes and laws. This is because miracles involving instantaneous creation are not analogous to what happens now.I agree that the initial creation (Gen. 1:1) was miraculous. And I insist on upholding the power of God in creation. But I maintain that the text does not insist either that the creation “week” was dominated by pure miracle or that natural processes were unimportant or nonexistent. Many Bible-believing theologians and commentators have noted that much of the language of Genesis 1 (for example, the development of vegetation on day three) strongly implies the processes of natural growth and development, initiated, nevertheless, by the fiat of God’s word (“Let the earth produce grass”). Others have argued that the days of Genesis 1 were long periods of time consistent with the discoveries of geology. Such theologians come from a variety of evangelical traditions and include such men as Charles Hodge, A. A. Hodge, B. B. Warfield, W. G. T. Shedd, J. Oliver Buswell, Jr., Alexander Maclaren, James Orr, Herman Bavinck, Tayler Lewis, Francis Hall, A. H. Strong, Bernard Ramm. Friedrich Bettex, Orton Wiley, John Miley, J. P. Lange, and Franz Delitzsch.Even older theologians like Saint Augustine and John Calvin held views of creation that anticipated these more recent scholars. The conservative Presbyterian scholar, B. B. Warfield, for example, points out that Calvin restricted the use of the great word “creation” to the initial act, and taught that in ordering the universe over the six days God used ordinary natural means. Amazingly, Warfield goes so far as to term Calvin’s view “pure evolutionism”!In any case, it certainly cannot be demonstrated conclusively from Scripture that the six days of Genesis 1:1–30 must be exactly 24 hours in length fitting into a single seven-day week. And the Christian geologist need not assume that all geological features were created with an appearance of age. He may assume that rocks, mountains, and other geological features of the six days of creation were formed through processes analogous with those of the present. And he has the right to use evidence contained in those rocks to reconstruct the past by analogy with the present. This also helps us avoid the problem of why God should have created a rock deposit that looked as if it had been formed by glacial action but really had not.Evidence For The Earth’S AntiquityIf we assume that the rocks of creation week were formed by processes we can know and interpret in terms of today’s laws, we find by analyzing the evidence in these rocks that Earth is extremely old and has a long, complex history. The geology of eastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey illustrates this. In general terms the area consists of a thick series of layers of sandstone, shale, limestone, and coal, which have buckled and in spots been penetrated by hot, molten silicate materials called magma.The following general history of the area is based on the work of hundreds of geologists during the past 150 years. First, an ancient rock surface was submerged in the sea and covered with beach sands, followed by fossil-bearing limestone deposits similar to those now accumulating on the shallow continental shelf off the southeast coast of the United States. Then deep-water and mud and sand were deposited on top of the earlier fossil-bearing limestone deposits. After these layers hardened into rock, they were folded, uplifted, eroded, and buried under another very thick accumulation of river, beach, and marine sediments. All this in turn was hardened into rock and again folded, uplifted, and eroded. On top of this erosion surface, river and lake sediments containing dinosaur fossils were deposited along with volcanic lava flows. After tilting, these layers eroded. Next, a thick sequence of sand and gravel was deposited along the east coast, and finally gravels left by vast glaciers in the northeast bring the story up to the present.This entire sequence of events for prehistoric Pennsylvania and New Jersey can be discovered by comparing these layered rocks with comparable deposits being formed today. Some creationists question the vast amount of time involved in such a sequence of events. But for the professional geologist, biblically oriented or not, the large amounts of time involved in the geological processes described are evident from several considerations.1. The varied characteristics of different rock formations suggest that sediment was deposited in a variety of environments. Now, great thicknesses of sediment generally accumulate slowly. For example, river deposits several hundred feet thick indicate the long-continued existence of that river. Transition from one environment to another is also very slow. Yet, in the eastern United States we see rock sequence reflecting numerous examples of radical changes in environment, each appearing to have existed a long time.2. The very distribution of fossils suggests that long stretches of time were involved in the development of the rocks in which they are found. Specific fossils are restricted to specific types of rock formations. This distribution suggests the periodic appearance of new forms and extinction of old forms. If all these sediments were deposited in a very brief time span, a given fossil animal would be distributed throughout the entire succession of sediments rather than in specific layers.3. The transformation of sediment into rock, the tilting and uplifting of that rock, and extensive erosion of solid bedrock are all processes that require much time. Rapid transformation into rock is very unusual and develops only under restricted circumstances. The present existence of thousands of feet of unconsolidated sediments off the Atlantic and Gulf coasts testifies that ordinarily such transformation does not occur quickly. Uplift of rock also occurs slowly. Although rock may be elevated several feet during a single earthquake, an uplift of thousands of feet would require a succession of events acting over a long time.4. In the light of what we know about the physical properties of rock layers, we can demonstrate mathematically that tens or hundreds of thousands of years would have been required to develop folds on the scale of those in the Appalachian mountain system.5. The sedimentary rocks have lava flows interlayered with them or igneous (magma-formed) rocks cutting across them. These rocks require time to solidify and cool to room temperature. Hawaiian lava lakes have taken as long as 16 years just to solidify to a depth of 50 yards. The time to cool to surface temperature was much longer. And in the rock record, there are lava flows thicker than the Hawaiian lakes. Successions of lava flows might thus require hundreds of years to form and cool. Moreover, many rocks then cooled from hot magma developed far underground where their heat would have been lost much more slowly than if they had cooled on the earth’s surface as lava does. The mathematical theory of heat conduction demonstrates that in some cases as much as a million years would have been necessary for the heat of the magma to be dissipated so that solidification could occur.Thus, the cumulative weight of several lines of evidence from the rock record, supplementing each other in every area of the globe, has persuaded most geologists, Christian and non-Christian, that the earth has experienced a long, dynamic history.Radiometric DatingBut none of the above lines of evidence provides us with dependable means for determining the exact age of a rock or geologic event. For that we appeal to radiometric dating.Radiometric dating concerns certain isotopes (varieties of atoms of given chemical elements like uranium, carbon, potassium, and rubidium). These isotopes disintegrate spontaneously at measurable, specific rates into other isotopes known as daughter products. To obtain the age of any material, geochronologists measure the quantities of radioactive isotopes and their daughter products in it, thereby obtaining an indication of the extent of disintegration. Corrections are made for the amounts of daughter isotopes in that material when it was formed. Through mathematical calculation, the age of the specimen can then be determined.Dozens of laboratories around the world are engaged in the radiometric dating of geological materials. Since the early part of the century, numerous techniques have been developed. Those with too many pitfalls have been discarded while sound methods have been refined. Consequently there are thousands of age determinations of rocks and minerals that have almost invariably yielded ages of millions to billions of years. Mathematical analysis of the distribution of uranium and lead isotopes suggests that Earth itself is on the order of 4.5 to 4.7 billion years old.Even outer space offers testimony to antiquities of this magnitude. Radiometric dating of many meteorites that have fallen to the earth indicates ages of between 4.5 and 4.6 billion years. And combined with the mathematical analysis of the distribution of radioactive elements on the moon, the radiometric dating of samples indicates it is about 4.6 billion years old. The very consistency of these results from separate bodies in the solar system reinforces the validity of radiometric methods.The geological evidence is utterly incompatible with the idea that the globe is only a few thousand years old. The only consistent way to maintain such an idea is to hold that virtually the entire rock record is the product of pure miracle. But Scripture certainly does not lend itself to such a conclusion.Many Christians are afraid to accept the conclusion of the earth’s antiquity because they think that this somehow establishes the validity of evolution. While significant biological evolution would not be possible in a recently created world, it is also true that significant biological evolution is not a logical necessity in an ancient world. The validity of biological evolution must be considered separately from the age of the earth.Fossils And Human EvolutionHuman evolution must also be considered separately from evolution in general. I personally believe evolution must be rejected as the mode of origin for the human race because the Bible demands a miracle for man’s origin. If the fossil evidence is evaluated on the assumption that the human body emerged through the agency of ordinary providentially controlled biological processes, then a significant transition from ancient types to modern man over the past four million years seems plausible.There are, for example, many humanlike fossil remains from eastern and southern Africa and from Asia. These remains suggest to many anthropologists a possible gradual transition of physical form from Australopithecus afarensis through Homo habilis and Homo erectus to Homo sapiens over the last four million years.Moreover, there are indications of human cultural development associated with the remains.The Christian paleontologist, however, must ask whether he can interpret the paleontological data solely in terms of natural processes or if he must assume that a miraculous act of God was the decisive factor. Is there any biblical evidence to indicate that the origin of man was something miraculous, or may we treat it in purely natural terms?Biblical Data On The Origin Of ManI believe Scripture compels us to accept a miraculous origin of man. In this conclusion I am supported by the overwhelming majority of evangelical commentators. Several lines of evidence support this conclusion.1. The human race is presented as made in the image of God. This biblical teaching would call in question a derivation of human beings from animals that are not created in the image of God.2. Genesis 2:7 says that when God breathed into man’s nostrils the breath of life man became a living creature. That which constituted man as a man also constituted him as a living creature. According to the Bible, man was not alive prior to his becoming man, so he is not a descendant of some other creature. Efforts to interpret this text in a purely figurative or allegorical manner are unsatisfactory because they ignore the structure of Gensis in which the book is divided into several historical narratives.3. Scripture indicates that Adam and Eve were separate creations and that the man appeared chronologically before the woman (Gen. 2; 1 Tim. 2:13). The temporal priority of the man before the woman is incompatible with an evolutionary view of the origin of man.4. Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15 teach that there was a distinct individual, Adam, who was the first man and by whose one sin plunged the human race into a state of condemnation. This individual is contrasted with the individual, Jesus Christ, by whose obedience God’s people were constituted as righteous. The individuality of Christ and the historical reality of his work demand, in terms of Paul’s analogy, that Adam, too, be a historical individual who committed a real act of disobedience in history.The individuality of Adam is difficult to reconcile with an evolutionary origin. But even more difficult to reconcile is the matter of death. Evolutionary theory would demand that biological death be a normal, natural part of existence of the ancestors of man as they gradually evolved toward humanness. Death is presented in both Genesis and Romans 5 as the penalty for sin. Even though this death may have as its major component the radical loss of blessed fellowship with God, nonetheless the physical aspect of death is not absent. Why do we repeatedly read the monotonous refrain “and he died” throughout the Genesis 5 genealogy if physical death as punishment for Adam’s sin is not in view?There is abundant evidence in Scripture to indicate that the origin of man in his totality was a miraculous event. The fossil remains, I think, may be interpreted to show an evolution of nonhuman animals, once created, and also of biological variation in man once created. But I do not think we can talk in terms of a biological transition from an animal to man.If someone can propose a view of evolution that would be consistent with the biblical demands that man is created in the image of God, that the sexes appeared separately, that man was in no way alive until he became a man, and that there was a unique first human individual, Adam, who was punished for his disobedience and who experienced physical death because of his sin, then we might calmly and dispassionately consider that idea in the light of God’s word. To date, however, I have not seen a satisfactory evolutionary view for the origin of man. The theological consequences of accepting currently existing ideas for human evolution are far too devastating, as we have pointed out.As shown by W. H. Green and B. B. Warfield, no serious theological problems are caused by accepting great antiquity for the human race. Exactly when a miraculous creation of Adam and Eve might have taken place, I do not know.Man’s creation probably goes back at least 50,000 years inasmuch as religious burial practices and highly developed art indicate that Neanderthal remains are genuinely human. Whether or not earlier remains like various species of Australopithecus, Homo habilis, or Homo erectus are genuinely human, and thus descendents of Adam, is a judgment that must be left to Christian anthropologists. They are in the best position to interpret existing fossils and to evaluate future discoveries.By contrast with human evolution, an ancient earth presents no serious negative theological consequence. Instead, the antiquity of the earth leads us to deeper wonder at the eternity of God just as the incredible vastness of the universe leads us to awesome wonder at his infinity.Davis A. Young is professor of geology at Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan. He is the author of Creation and the Flood (Baker, 1977) and Christianity and the Age of the Earth (Zondervan, 1982).

What the Book of Numbers was to the Israelites, the Book of Redemption is to the congregation of Vernon AME Church.

When Turner took the position at Vernon, the book was old and decayed, though. He stuck it in a Tupperware container in an attempt to protect it from further damage. It might have stayed there if not for a special visit to the church on Juneteenth in 2020 by Oklahoma’s First Lady Sarah Stitt. During the tour, Turner showed Stitt the book and told her the story of the people whose names were written in it.

“She just immediately became overwhelmed by the story of faith of the individuals who had just lost their homes, just lost their businesses,” Turner said. “Some of them lost their loved ones and friends in the race massacre in 1921, but yet they came back to the church.”

The story stuck with Stitt, and she reached out to the Museum of the Bible to see if they could help Vernon restore the book.

The answer was yes. Anthony Schmidt, senior curator for the Museum of the Bible, said he and the staff at the Oklahoma City headquarters were instantly captivated by the story of the church and the Book of Redemption.

They met with Stitt and Turner in late July 2020 to discuss the project. In August, they began what would become an eight-month restoration project involving 15 people.

“It was in rough condition,” Schmidt said. “The cover was warped, and the leather that was originally on the cover had gone from a rich red to a brownish color, and it was flaking off and disintegrating.”

The binding for the book was torn in places, and some of the pages had tears and were falling out.

“When we first saw it, we knew this was going to take a little bit of time and a little bit of effort to restore it fully,” Schmidt said.

Conservator Francisco Rodriquez led the project: meticulously taking the book apart, repairing pages, cleaning mold, and stitching it back together again.

Turner had expressed his desire to see as much of the original preserved as possible, and Rodriguez did his best to honor that.

“What Francisco was able to do was save large portions of the original cover but also place them on top of a new leather cover that was close to the original color it would have looked like back in the 1930s,” Schmidt explained. “You get to see the cover that survived to today but also what it would have looked like back in the day.”

In addition to restoring the original, the Museum of the Bible made a replica so that people will be able to look at and study the book without handling the original and adding any more wear and tear.

“Generations to come will be able to look at this book and study it and learn about the history of this church,” Schmidt said.

Schmidt said he was personally touched when he read the donations listed in the book. Some donations are large for the time—$50 or $100. But other gifts are smaller—50 cents or a dollar. To him, those represent the biggest hearts.

“These were individuals who didn’t have a lot of money but they had a lot of faith and they had a lot of love for this community, and they wanted to see it rebuilt and wanted to see it thrive like it had,” he said. “That’s just inspiring.”

When Schmidt hears Turner speak of the work that the church is doing today, including raising money for feeding the hungry during the pandemic, he can’t help but think of the 360 names in the ledger and the families they represented.

“The hope and perseverance you see demonstrated in this ledger allowed the church to thrive and enabled it to serve the needs of the community for generations after,” he said.

Turner said he couldn’t be happier with the finished product and is grateful to be able to have it on display at the church for the 100th anniversary of the massacre on June 1 and for many years to come.

Church Life

Delivered Twice from Death in Lebanon, Retiree Keeps Serving After Explosion

From an orphanage to Beirut’s fanciest hotel to World Vision’s top ranks, Jean Bouchebel has seen how God does not forsake his church.

Jean Bouchebel surveys Beirut's damaged port after the devastating explosion on August 4, 2020.

Jean Bouchebel surveys Beirut's damaged port after the devastating explosion on August 4, 2020.

Christianity Today May 28, 2021
Courtesy of Jean Bouchebel

When Jean Bouchebel retired at age 70, he was not ready to simply relax.

Instead, he still works full time and wakes at 2 a.m. for prayer and meditation.

From an orphanage in Lebanon to leadership at World Vision, God’s faithfulness saved Bouchebel multiple times from death during the worst days of civil war. Through his service, thousands of refugees have received the food, clothes, and shelter they needed to stay alive.

But his morning discipline is not monastic piety. The daily hour-long prayer at his home in Texas precedes meetings with pastors and partner organizations eight time zones ahead in Lebanon.

With his son, Patrick, in 2012 Bouchebel founded Witness as Ministry after working 27 years with World Vision International, first in Lebanon and then at its headquarters in California. During the height of the war in Syria, when more than 2 million refugees flooded across the border into Lebanon, he could not contemplate the leisure of retirement.

Refugees were living in tents in the snow.

Children lacked adequate footwear.

People were hungry.

Drawing on skills he had learned at World Vision, Bouchebel shipped 40-foot containers to Lebanon filled with medical equipment, clothing, hygiene kits, and food. Over 1,000 meals a day were provided to needy refugees.

And amid an economic collapse exacerbated by last summer’s explosion in Beirut’s harbor, relief work has extended to the Lebanese. Church partners have served Muslim and Christian without discrimination, giving out nearly 3,000 food parcels to families, providing medical services for 3,600 people, and repairing 168 neighboring homes.

Jean BouchebelDonald E. Miller
Jean Bouchebel

Born in 1942 in the mountain town of Bikfaiya, Bouchebel shared a home with his five siblings, parents, grandparents, aunts, and uncles. But when he was eight years old, his father died and his mother fell ill.

The family solution was to place the children in different orphanages. Six years later, his mother passed away. At age 14, Bouchebel assumed responsibility for his siblings, working at a hotel as a dishwasher. His modest $3 monthly salary helped to provide clothing, bedding, and books for his brothers and sisters.

At age 17, Bouchebel moved to a different hotel as a busboy, with a better salary. But realizing the limitation of his education and future prospects, he took English courses at the local YMCA and later learned German from a tutor as the hotel had many guests flying in on the Lufthansa airline.

Three years later, his fluency in Arabic, French, English, and German landed Bouchebel a job as a waiter at the prestigious InterContinental Hotel—the best in Lebanon. He rapidly advanced, becoming a maître d’ (headwaiter) in the dining room, then assistant food and beverage director, and eventually the director of the entire department for the 600-bed facility.

Jean Bouchebel at the InterContinental Hotel in Beirut in 1964.Courtesy of Jean Bouchebel
Jean Bouchebel at the InterContinental Hotel in Beirut in 1964.

But despite his success, he felt a void in his life. While questioning his purpose and what happened after death, Bouchebel was introduced by a friend—who had a radical life change after converting to Christianity—to a couple who read the Bible with him, which had not been his practice as a Roman Catholic. Shortly thereafter, he went to a revival meeting at a local church and gave his life to Jesus.

“I have lived 30 years of my life wanting to make a future for myself,” Bouchebel recalls praying. “From this day on, I would like to live for you.”

Two years later, the civil war started in Lebanon. Tourism ground to a halt, as 120,000 people were killed between 1975 and 1990. The InterContinental reduced its staff to five key people, including Bouchebel. They met daily but had no guests to serve.

After several months, he heard from God.

“I felt the Lord pushing me—as if two hands were pushing me to get out of the hotel,” he said. “I couldn’t understand what was happening, but I realized at the end that God didn’t want me to stay.”

At breakfast, Bouchebel told the general manager he would take his holiday leave and come back when the business picked up again. Irate, his boss fired him and told him never to return.

That same evening, a militia set the hotel on fire, killing his remaining colleagues. Bouchebel became convinced that God’s hand was on him, cementing a conviction that God had a purpose for his life.

After nine months of unemployment for Bouchebel, the InterContinental Hotel in Saudi Arabia offered him a job. Desperate for an income, he left his wife and two young children behind in Lebanon with extended family, negotiating with the hotel to return home every three months.

Over the next four years, Bouchebel rose rapidly, directing the food and beverage service in three branches. But his visits home troubled him, as he witnessed increasing scenes of poverty and displacement brought on by the civil war.

God then told him to again leave a secure hotel job in order to serve those in need.

“I will never leave you; I will never forsake you,” he recalls God assuring him. “I will provide for you, and I will provide for your ministry.”

But first Bouchebel had to wait—and learn dependence.

He returned to Lebanon in 1980, and for four years he was unemployed. The family survived on savings while farmland neighbors brought them fruits and vegetables.

Waiting on God for direction, Jean was given a full scholarship at Arab Baptist Theological Seminary and reconnected with the friend who initially led him to the Lord.

And then direction came.

“Jean, you have nothing,” said his friend. “Why don’t you serve God in the Palestinian camps?”

Initially afraid for his safety, as Palestinians and Lebanese Christians were on opposite sides of the civil war, Bouchebel was warmly greeted by a poor family when he entered the camp. (About 100,000 Palestinians fled to Lebanon during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, neither permitted to return nor to fully integrate into Lebanese society.) For the next year, he visited regularly, sharing Christian literature along with his own meager resources.

Meanwhile, World Vision had also begun relief work in Lebanon. But as foreign diplomats, teachers, and charity workers increasingly became targets of kidnapping, the NGO needed to hire a local person to manage its operations. Noticing Bouchebel’s work in the camps and impressed by his business background, World Vision asked if he would direct its Lebanese program on an interim basis.

Fifteen years later, and responsible for a region that included Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Cyprus, and Greece, Bouchebel’s World Vision budget had grown from $300,000 to $30 million.

“The Lord honored me,” he said. “When God makes a promise, he is faithful.”

Bouchebel extended this faithfulness liberally, eventually working through the leadership of 11 different Christian denominations, as well as the Muslim Shiite, Sunni, and Druze communities.

Jean Bouchebel and Archbishop Issam John Darwish of the Melkite Catholic Eparchy of Zahle and the Bekaa, Lebanon.Donald E. Miller
Jean Bouchebel and Archbishop Issam John Darwish of the Melkite Catholic Eparchy of Zahle and the Bekaa, Lebanon.

But God would first have to save his life again.

Crossing Beirut from its Muslim east to its Christian west in 1985, Bouchebel and his family were stopped at a checkpoint. His 15-year-old son was beaten, and his 10-year-old daughter seized. Taking all of them to a nearby olive garden, the militiaman told Bouchebel’s wife and children to say goodbye.

But first, taking the $3,000 Bouchebel was carrying for World Vision relief, the man patted him down in search of more—and his hands discovered a pocket New Testament.

“What’s this?” demanded the guard.

“Do you really want to know?” asked Bouchebel. Opening the Bible, he read from John 3:16.

The militiaman grabbed the book and threw it down to the ground. But he then told Bouchebel to take his family and leave. He even gave him $20 for taxi fare.

“God snatches people from death,” said Bouchebel, “if he still has a purpose for them.”

Lebanon’s war ended in 1990, and nine years later Bouchebel and his wife relocated to Southern California. For another 13 years, he worked in the international office of World Vision as its director for resource development, extending his Middle East service to Africa and Latin America.

Now 79 years old, Bouchebel’s heart remains broken. Conflicts in the Middle East are unceasing, and he is especially troubled by their impact on the church. In 1943, a newly independent Lebanon was 55 percent Christian. Today it is 30 percent Christian or less, with continual migration.

This situation is echoed in Syria and Iraq. At the beginning of the 20th century, Christians represented 13 percent of the Middle East population. Today, estimates put these earliest Christian communities at a mere 4 percent.

“I started with nothing in life—not even a pair of socks—and God made me his servant,” said Bouchebel. “The only hope I have is God’s promise that he will not forsake his church, and this is what pushes me to do more and more for others.”

Donald E. Miller is director of strategic initiatives at the University of Southern California’s Center for Religion and Civic Culture and its global project on engaged spirituality, which produced this article with support from the John Templeton Foundation and Templeton Religion Trust.

News

China Sanctions Evangelical Leader Who Called Out Religious Freedom Violations

Johnnie Moore, an outgoing USCIRF commissioner, spoke up to ask governments to stop ignoring Chinese treatment of Uyghur Muslims, Christians, and Tibetan Buddhists.

Christianity Today May 27, 2021
Shannon Finney / Getty Images

Johnnie Moore called China’s recent decision to bar him from entering the country a “publicity stunt” and a sign that Americans’ continued advocacy on behalf of religious minorities is having an effect.

After concluding his second term serving on the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) earlier this month, the evangelical leader was sanctioned by the Chinese government Wednesday for his outspoken criticism toward what he deemed “the world’s foremost violator of human rights and religious freedom.”

USCIRF’s annual report, released in April, condemned China’s religious freedom violations and designated the country’s abuse of the Uyghur Muslim population as genocide. Moore—head of the PR firm Kairos Group and a faith adviser to former president Donald Trump—has addressed those issues and stood by pro-democracy advocates in Hong Kong, including Catholic businessman Jimmy Lai. Lai was sentenced to prison last month for his role in the 2019 protests.

In a Beijing press conference, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian claimed Moore’s advocacy and the recent USCIRF report adopts the “guise” of religious freedom concerns to interfere with Chinese affairs, but really “ignores facts” and is “based on lies,” the state-backed Global Times reported.

The decision to block Moore and his family from entering China, Hong Kong, or Macau was a countermeasure to recent State Department sanctions against a former Chinese official involved in detaining members of the Falun Gong movement, a minority faith which China designates as a cult. China took similar action against USCIRF Chair Gayle Manchin and Vice Chair Tony Perkins in March. That was the first time in USCIRF history that a foreign government had imposed sanctions against individual commissioners.

In this year’s USCIRF report, the commission recommended the US government respond to “deteriorating” conditions in China with targeted financial and visa sanctions on those responsible for religious freedom violations. In his own commentary, Moore called on the US and its allies to stand up to the CCP and stop ignoring its abuses.

“It is an honor to be sanctioned by the Chinese Communist Party for giving my voice to the Uyghur Muslims, Christians (including Jimmy Lai), Tibetan Buddhists & countless others the CCP tries to silence every day—a privilege of living in the United States, the land of the free and the home of the brave,” Moore said in a statement.

He told CT that he believes his evangelical faith and his efforts to build bipartisan support around addressing human rights violations in China were factors in why the government chose him to target.

However, he has no plans to visit the country and sees their efforts to sanction a private citizen as a sign that officials are shaken by the continued criticism coming from the US. “They are weaker than they want us to believe that they are,” he said.

USCIRF chair Gayle Manchin said in an interview with CT in April that the US has a clear understanding of the violations happening there, particularly at forced labor camps.

“It is not only so egregious, but they [Chinese officials] are trying to spread among other nations that what they are doing is okay,” she said. “With China’s overall goal of global power, it is very frightening.”

News

The Fire This Time: Reflections on a Year of Racial Reckoning

A webinar on how it has changed us, and where the church should go from here.

Christianity Today May 27, 2021

On May 25, 2020, the brutal murder of George Floyd by officer Derek Chauvin shocked a global community and served as one of the primary catalysts, along with the killings of Breonna Taylor and Ahmaud Arbery, behind the racial reckoning that has dominated our society over the past year.

A day after the one-year anniversary of George Floyd's death, six Christian scholars, ministers, and activists gathered to ponder, lament, and assess the meaning of a transformative year of revolution and introspection. How has it changed us, and where does the church go from here?

Our goal for this wide-ranging one-hour webinar was to highlight the diverse voices of Christian leaders who were intimately engaged in the church's pursuit of racial justice and reconciliation. We're pleased to share this recording of the event.

Our Panelists

THEON HILL (moderator) is associate professor of communication at Wheaton College where he researches and teaches on the intersections of race, politics, and popular culture. Currently, he is in the final stages of completing his first scholarly book, an extended study of the future of Black political rhetoric in the 21st century. He was recently named a Civil Society Fellow with the Aspen Institute. In this two-year fellowship, Theon will study community-based strategies for promoting civic dialogue in an age of division. Theon is also a cohost of From the Underside, a new podcast coming soon from Christianity Today.

REV. CECILIA J. WILLIAMS is president and CEO of the Christian Community Development Association (CCDA). She is passionate about connecting the ministry of local churches and neighboring community organizations with the physical, social, structural, and spiritual needs of the communities in which they are planted. Prior to leading CCDA, Cecilia served as pastor of Sanctuary Covenant Church in Minneapolis and executive minister of the Love Mercy Do Justice mission priority of the Evangelical Covenant Church denomination. She and her husband, Troy, have two adult children and reside in Minneapolis.

NOEMI VEGA QUIÑONES is a PhD student in religion and theological ethics at Southern Methodist University where she is studying Christology, race, borderland epistemology, and dialogues across difference. Noemi's immigrant and ministry background fuel her academic interests. She currently serves on staff with InterVarsity Christian Fellowship in the Latino Fellowship department. Noemi is a coauthor of Hermanas: Deepening Our Identity and Growing Our Influence.

EMMETT G. PRICE III is one of the nation’s leading experts on music of the African Diaspora, Christian worship, and the Black Christian experience. A well-regarded scholar, educator, and public theologian. Dr. Price received a BA in music from the University of California, Berkeley, and earned both his MA and PhD in ethnomusicology from the University of Pittsburgh. He also obtained an MA in urban ministry leadership from Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary. Currently, he serves as professor of worship, church, and culture and founding executive director of the Institute for the Study of the Black Christian Experience at Gordon-Conwell. He is also founding pastor of Community of Love Christian Fellowship in the Allston neighborhood of Boston.

KIMANI "KIKI" FRANCOIS is a writer, poet, rhetorician, and theo-activist. She graduated from Wheaton College in May of 2019 with a degree in communication with a concentration in rhetoric and culture. She is a Master of Divinity candidate at Candler School of Theology at Emory University. Her area of focus includes theology, ethics, social justice, Black womanhood, and clergy leadership. She is the host of a successful podcast, Kiki’s Korner: Where Biblical Principles Meet Culture. She wrote this article on violence against Black women for Intersected.

TROY JACKSON is the state strategies director for Faith in Action. In 2015, he joined a team at Crossroads Church in Cincinnati to develop Undivided, a racial reconciliation program that has engaged over 5,000 people since 2016. Prior to that, he served as lead pastor of University Christian Church in Cincinnati. Jackson holds a Master of Divinity degree from Princeton Theological Seminary and a doctorate in US history from the University of Kentucky. He's the author of Becoming King: Martin Luther King Jr. and the Making of a National Leader. He lives in Cincinnati with his wife, Amanda, and their three children, Jacob, Emma, and Ellie.

For more information on pursuing racial justice and healing, our panelists recommend these resources and organizations:

CCDA

The Christian Community Development Association (CCDA) is a network of Christians committed to seeing people and communities wholistically restored.

LivingUNDIVIDED

LivingUNDIVIDED is a six-week multi-racial experiential journey in pursuit of racial solidarity and justice.

Faith In Action

Faith in Action is a national community organizing network that gives people of faith

Intersected

Intersected’s mission is to empower actions that promote racially equitable communities, making everyday heroism more accessible.

Sub:Culture

Sub:Culture is a college outreach ministry dedicated to removing the barriers that impede Black students from academic success and spiritual wholeness.

Be the Bridge

Be the Bridge is a Christian ministry that empowers people and organizations toward racial healing, equity, and reconciliation.

Also, check out this CT news report on how suburban Minneapolis churches have responded to the call for racial healing in the year since George Floyd's death.

News

Southern Baptists Prep for Biggest Convention in 24 Years

President J. D. Greear calls for prayers for gospel unity ahead of the Nashville gathering.

Christianity Today May 26, 2021
Westend61 / Getty Images

A year after calling off their annual meeting due to COVID-19, more than 12,600 Southern Baptists plan to attend this year’s in Nashville, the convention’s biggest turnout since 1997.

Ronnie Floyd, president of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) Executive Committee, tweeted the pre-registration figures this week, ahead of the June 15–16 event.

Registration will be open through the meeting itself, but the number of messengers planning to attend has already surpassed the 8,200 who went to the previous annual meeting in Birmingham in 2019. The SBC hasn’t brought together a crowd over 10,000 in over a decade, according to its own records.

The Southern Baptist annual meeting tends to draw bigger crowds when held in southern cities, and Nashville, home to the denominational headquarters, is a major hub already.

It’s also a belated election year for the SBC, with a full slate of presidential hopefuls gunning for the position J. D. Greear held for a third year due to the 2020 meeting being cancelled.

And the SBC has been hashing out ideological divisions around hot topics like race, politics, abuse, and women in ministry, as a newly vocal conservative wing—the Conservative Baptist Network—warns the denomination about drifting leftward and getting entangled with critical race theory.

Greear has called for three days of prayer and fasting leading up to the annual meeting, held on Wednesdays starting this week.

One of the areas of prayer is around gospel unity, asking that God would bring churches together for their sake of their mission. Earlier this year, Greear told the SBC Executive Committee that denominational disputes over secondary issues and their failure to adequately address racism in the SBC were hurting their witness and their ability to spread the gospel.

The size of the gathering reflects the significance of this year’s meeting for many Southern Baptists, who see the slate of presidential hopefuls representing different visions for the future of the SBC. The 14-million-member denomination has suffered years of decline, worsened by the pandemic.

Candidates include Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary; Alabama pastor Ed Litton, known for his involvement in racial reconciliation efforts; former SBC Executive Committee chair Mike Stone, a founding member of the Conservative Baptist Network and critic of “cancel culture” and “woke” ideology; and Randy Adams, a leader with the Northwest Baptist Convention.

Southern Baptists can only elect the convention president and vote on resolutions by attending the annual meeting in person as delegates or “messengers” from their churches.

Just months ago, SBC leaders didn’t know what to expect for the annual meeting, which was scheduled and planned while the country was still in the throes of the pandemic. Other denominations called off their meetings or made contingency plans, unsure of whether Americans would be comfortable traveling or attending big events by the summer.

There was also concern that COVID-19 precautions could skew the attendance. If risks were still high, would it just be more conservative attendees—those less concerned about the spread of the virus—who came to Nashville? Or, if the venue was strict about masks and social distancing, would fewer conservatives make it?

In April, the SBC announced that the meeting had moved from the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center to the Music City Center in downtown Nashville to accommodate the attendance levels and provide adequate social distancing. It’s going to be the first big meeting in the city since the pandemic.

The Baptists will test the city’s preparation for postpandemic conventions, Butch Spyridon, president and CEO of the Nashville Convention and Visitors Corp, told the Tennessean. Convention personnel will track the Baptists’ travel histories and vaccination rates as well as compliance with safety protocols.

The Christian and Missionary Alliance (CMA) is also gathering for its annual council in Nashville this year, with a crowd of 2,600 expected at the Gaylord, May 31–June 3. A smaller denomination of under 400,000 members, the CMA said registration is among the highest in decades. The annual council is also available for online attendees. One big agenda item for the CMA is a conversation about whether women can be called pastors.

Ideas

What Do Americans Actually Think About the Equality Act and Religious Liberty?

Staff Editor

As with much polling, the devil is in the conveniently omitted details.

Christianity Today May 26, 2021
Illustration by Rick Szuecs / Source Images: Amir Riazipour / Eye for Ebony / Unsplash

Once every week or two, I get a press release about the Equality Act. The theme is consistent: This bill is popular. Americans love it. They want it passed yesterday.

That’s a big claim. If correct, it means American views on religious liberty, sexuality and gender, and their intersection in nondiscrimination laws have undergone a swift and stark shift. It means Christians and members of other religions who hew to a more traditional view of sex are not merely in the cultural minority but facing massive legal changes to their worship, business, and educational lives. But if the reality is more complicated—and, spoiler alert, I think it is—we may have stumbled into a serious national misunderstanding about an important and contentious issue.

The Equality Act in its present form has been under congressional consideration for half a decade. It’s passed the House twice, never the Senate. President Biden called for its passage in his April speech to Congress, but since then the bill has stagnated while legislative attention goes to major spending packages instead. Still, this isn’t longshot legislation, and it will likely be reintroduced in the next Congress if it doesn’t pass this one.

What happens if this becomes law? The bill’s headline purpose is to “prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation,” and it mainly works by amending the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Some of the Equality Act’s provisions would be welcomed across the political spectrum, but four parts have raised grave concern regarding religious liberty.

One is the bill’s expansion of the definition of “public accommodation.” The 1964 law defined this as hotels, restaurants, gas stations, and some entertainment venues. The Equality Act adds “any establishment that provides a good, service, or program,” a definition broad enough to potentially include houses of worship. Massachusetts passed a similar law several years ago, and its initial regulatory guidance treated churches as public accommodations whenever they held “a secular event, such as a spaghetti supper, that [was] open to the general public.” That guidance was nixed after churches filed suit, but the Equality Act could nationalize it. A letter from a group of 57 black pastors warns this would embroil houses of worship “in constant litigation.”

That letter also brings up the second religious-liberty objection to the bill: It would preclude federal funding going to any organization deemed to discriminate against LGBTQ people. Given how the bill defines discrimination, that would affect adoption agencies that don’t work with gay couples and universities (which receive federal funds via student loans) with community-life rules that preclude same-sex relationships.

The third issue is the Equality Act’s rejection of religious belief as a legal defense against the law’s demands. “This would be the first major piece of legislation that excludes explicitly protection for religious freedom,” Shirley Mullen, a board member of the Council of Christian Colleges and Universities, recently told CT. Current law doesn’t make religion a blanket exception clause, but it tries to “balance competing claims,” Mullen explained, and the Equality Act would eliminate that balance.

Lastly, the Civil Rights Act acknowledged there are some jobs in which sex “is a bona fide occupational qualification.” The Equality Act agrees but says that “individuals [should be] recognized as qualified in accordance with their gender identity” rather than biological sex. The same standard is applied to access to “a restroom, a locker room, and a dressing room,” which would pose a problem for conservative colleges with single-sex dorms, among other institutions.

Is this what the average American so eagerly supports? At first glance, national surveys say yes. A PRRI poll from March asked whether “a small business owner” should be allowed “to refuse to provide products or services to gay or lesbian people, if doing so violates their religious beliefs.” Six in 10 said no. (White evangelicals were the sole major religious group in which a plurality disagreed, but it was basically an even split.) Another March poll found seven in 10 Americans (including half of white evangelicals) back the Equality Act.

But the way that second poll described the legislation is crucial here. It didn’t clearly explain those four key changes, and it implied the issue at hand is LGBTQ people being denied service for basic life necessities, like bank accounts, transit, and medical care.

The PRRI results also aren’t as straightforward as they initially seem. Another PRRI poll from February captured one important nuance: The smaller, more private (i.e., not funded by or working with the government), and more directly involved in worship practices an organization is, the more Americans say it should be able to conform freely to its operators’ religious beliefs.

Yet all three polls failed to consistently make a vital distinction: general vs. specific refusal of service. The February survey distinguished for medical care, finding more Americans would require doctors to serve all groups of people in a general sense than to provide a few specific procedures, like abortions or “reproductive health services like contraception or sterilization to transgender people.” (Christian doctors are trying to strike a delicate balance between being sensitive to gender-identity preferences and maintaining personal convictions around sexual ethics.) That distinction wasn’t made for other lines of work. Respondents weren’t asked, for instance, if they see a difference between requiring a conservative, religious baker to bake for a gay wedding and requiring him to sell a gay customer any generic cookie already in the case.

Other polling indicates many Americans do see a difference there. One 2018 survey found 43 percent think religiously motivated denial of services should be allowed always or “in only some instances.” A 2016 poll and a follow-up in 2020 both showed Americans evenly split when asked about wedding-specific services. This is a critical distinction for religious liberty, but the Equality Act would flatten it.

Those press releases I get are correct in one sense: Americans overwhelmingly support extending the basic nondiscrimination protections of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to cover sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation. When pollsters suggest this is what the Equality Act does, it predictably receives broad approval. But that’s not an accurate description of the bill, which means headlines touting those poll results are wrong and lawmakers considering this legislation or some similar bill in the future may be misinformed.

Americans have complicated and probably fluctuating views on these questions. I suspect something like the Fairness for All Act—the compromise legislation endorsed in that letter from black pastors and attracting interest from some conservatives—better reflects the median national opinion, which has moved significantly left yet nevertheless contains more subtleties than many surveys capture. Those are subtleties legislation shouldn’t ignore for the sake of principle, the Constitution, and representative governance alike.

The culture war is so often in blitzkrieg mode: Everyone wants a fast, maximal victory. This isn’t how our constitutional system is designed to work, however, nor should it be with matters as intensely personal and weighty as religious liberty and LGBTQ rights. Americans can and, I believe, want to do better than this bill.

News

Died: Eilat Mazar, Archaeologist Who Believed the Bible

In 50 years of excavation, she connected modern Israel to Hebrew kings and prophets.

Christianity Today May 26, 2021
Portrait by Ouria Tadmor / Edits by CT

Eilat Mazar, a nonreligious archaeologist who embraced the unfashionable idea of digging with a shovel in one hand and a Bible in the other, died Tuesday at 64.

In her five decades excavating the Holy Land, Mazar discovered the remains of a palace believed to belong to King David, a gate identified with King Solomon, a wall thought to have been built by Nehemiah, two clay seals that name the captors of the prophet Jeremiah, seals that name King Hezekiah, and a seal that may have belonged to the prophet Isaiah.

Once called the “queen of Jerusalem archaeology,” Mazar took the Bible seriously as a historical text and quarreled with scholars who thought it was unscientific to pay too much attention to Scripture.

“Look,” she told Christianity Today in 2011, “when I’m excavating Jerusalem, and when I’m excavating at the city of David, and when I’m excavating near the Kidron Valley and near the Gihon Spring and at the Ophel—these are all biblical terms. So it’s not like I’m here because it’s some anonymous place. This is Jerusalem, which we know best from the Bible.”

Mazar said she was not religious but would pore over the Bible, reading it repeatedly, “for it contains within it descriptions of genuine historical reality.”

Mazar sometimes literally took directions from the sacred text. In 1997, she wrote about how 2 Samuel 5:17 describes David going down from his palace to a fortification. Assuming that was an accurate description and looking at the topography of Jerusalem, she identified the place where David’s palace should be. In 2005, she was able to start excavation at the site, and almost immediately discovered evidence she was right—and so was the Book of Samuel.

“I [can’t] believe these archaeologists who ignore the Bible,” Mazar told CT. “To ignore the written sources, especially the Bible—I don’t believe any serious scholar anywhere would do this. It doesn't make any sense.”

Mazar was born in Israel in September 1956. She started going on digs at age 11, under the tutelage of her famous archaeologist grandfather, Benjamin Mazar.

The elder Mazar was a Jew born in Russia who studied archaeology in Germany before emigrating to what in 1929 was British-controlled Palestine. He became one of the founding fathers of modern Israel, and his excavation helped advance the idea that Israel was the Jewish homeland.

He involved his sons and as many of their children as he could recruit in his projects. In 1967, he started training the 11-year-old Eilat on the Temple Mount excavation, shortly after the site in Jerusalem’s old city was captured by Israel in the Six-Day War.

“It’s nice to touch your history,” she said.

Mazar earned a bachelor’s degree from Hebrew University in 1981 and went to work as a professional archaeologist. She had a brief marriage immediately after finishing her mandatory military service. It ended in divorce. She got remarried to archaeologist Yair Shoham. He died suddenly in 1997, at the age of 44. That same year, Mazar finished her doctorate at Hebrew University, writing a groundbreaking thesis on the biblical Phoenicians based on her excavation of a Phoenician site in northern Israel.

Critics said that Mazar sometimes made too much of her discoveries and was too quick to connect the things she unearthed to biblical stories. One scholar told The New York Times that Mazar was like someone who has a button and wants to call it a whole suit. Others said she was unduly influenced by a political agenda, and pointed out that her funding came from conservative, pro-Israeli sources.

Her fiercest critic was archaeologist Israel Finkelstein, who taught that David’s biblical kingdom was greatly exaggerated, probably no more than a hill-country village occupied by a tribal chief.

“You cannot study biblical archeology with only a simple reading of the text,” he said in 2006. “The Bible cannot be understood without a knowledge of the millennia of biblical criticism that has gone along with it. … The Bible is an important source, but we can’t take it seriously.”

Other authorities came to her defense, however. Hershel Shanks, the founding editor of Biblical Archaeology Review who frequently clashed with scholars, said Mazar’s approach was perfectly scientific. She started with a hypothesis from the Bible, and then tested it by digging.

What she found, by any measure, was remarkable.

After discovering the large stone structure she identified as David’s palace in 2005, she unearthed a clay seal, called a bulla, used to stamp documents. She took it home to decipher, and figured out the bulla bore the name of a prince who called for the prophet Jeremiah’s death in Jeremiah 38:1–6.

“I let out a shriek of surprise that rang out through the still house,” Mazar recalled. “Fortunately, the children slept soundly. I felt as though I had just ‘resurrected’ someone straight out of the Bible.”

Two years later, after developing a new excavation method called “wet sifting,” she found a second bulla, bearing the name of another prince in the biblical passage. The site was apparently a storehouse of official records. One of Mazar’s cousins, also an archaeologist, called it “something of a miracle.”

There were more to come:

In 2007, Mazar discovered a wall she identified with Nehemiah’s hasty construction after the return from Babylonian exile.

Seal of King Hezekiah
Seal of King Hezekiah

In 2010, she announced she found a city gate dating to the reign of King Solomon.

In 2015, she discovered a seal that said, “Belonging to Hezekiah son of Ahaz king of Judah.”

In 2018, she discovered another seal that could contain the name of the prophet Isaiah. The final part of one word is missing from the piece of clay—if it ends in the Hebrew letter aleph, then the seal reads, “Belonging to Isaiah [the] prophet.” She conceded the seal might belong to another Isaiah, though, and the incomplete word could be something besides “prophet.”

Mazar found great joy in connecting archaeological discoveries to the Bible and Jewish history, but she also believed it was important just to dig.

“When you go on a site, you use the best archaeological methods that you know of,” she told CT. “You put aside all theories and start working. Then the site itself—what’s revealed—comes up, whatever it is. Either it supports what you had in mind to find, or not.”

Mazar is survived by a daughter and three sons.

News

More than a Meal: How Austin Ministries Are Expanding Their Approach to Homelessness

After the city voted to ban encampments in the Texas capital, more churches see advocacy, lobbying, and government partnerships as part of their outreach.

Church Under the Bridge gathers for Easter 2021 in Austin.

Church Under the Bridge gathers for Easter 2021 in Austin.

Christianity Today May 26, 2021
Courtesy of Amy Kenyon

East of downtown Austin, a row of more than 20 closely linked tents and makeshift shelters are set up outside the Terrazas Branch of the Austin Public Library, around the corner from Christ Church of Austin.

The church’s associate rector, Matt Dampier, visits the homeless encampment on Sundays to meet with people and offer Communion. I walked with him to the encampment shortly after a recent election that reinstated a camping ban designed to remove growing homeless encampments throughout the Texas capital.

“They’re trying to get all those homeless people out of sight,” Amy Goldman, 44, told us. “What they need to do is lower the cost of living and allow a living wage.”

Goldman, wearing a clean Philippians 4:13 T-shirt, has been homeless for nine years. She moves between this camp, where she shares shelter with another person, and one further south where she keeps her own tent tucked away.

Goldman’s response accurately reflects that someone with a minimum-wage job ($7.25 an hour) would have to work 120 hours a week to afford a one-bedroom apartment in Austin, according to Ending Community Homeless Coalition (ECHO) 2020 data.

Limping along the wet sidewalk after a heavy downpour, Stephen Holmes, 54, stops to speak with us, his bare feet splattered with post-rain debris and his disabled left leg jutting outward.

“I’m not living the American dream,” Holmes said. He’s originally from Austin and attended Anderson High School on the northwest side of town. “I’m an Anderson Trojan,” he said proudly, as my heart sunk even further when I heard him name my neighborhood school.

Holmes had been on disability and taking care of his father for 10 years before he died. He became homeless for the first time three months ago. “I want to be self-sufficient,” he said. “The state is going to need to find some cheap housing.” Dampier asked Holmes if he could pray for him, which he did.

Goldman and Holmes are among some 3,160 people experiencing homelessness in Austin/Travis County, with 2,238 of those living unsheltered in tents, cars, and abandoned buildings as opposed to traditional shelters, according to 2021 statistics from ECHO. Austin’s Homeless Response System shows a 4.5 percent increase in the unhoused from 2019 to 2021, with a 20.6 percent increase for people experiencing unsheltered homelessness.

Historically, the role of churches has been to distribute meals, clothing, and hygiene items, as well as offer community and fellowship, said Emily Seales, a Christian social worker who was a case management supervisor at Trinity Center in downtown Austin and is now engaged in a technology and health research study for Sunrise Homeless Navigation Center and the University of Texas.

Growth in encampments over the past two years and recent debate over the reinstated public camping ban have led more leaders, such as Seales, to focus both on temporary assistance for their vulnerable neighbors and on advocacy to fix what they see as broken systems that have left people without livable wages and affordable housing in the first place. Part of that advocacy includes accelerating cooperative efforts between the city, established nonprofits, churches, faith-based organizations, and individuals.

“I don’t think the city knows what to do with faith communities,” said Cathy Stone, associate pastor at First United Methodist Church in downtown Austin. “But I think it’s important that we start practicing and showing that we can do more and that we also want to be involved in advocating and decision making.”

The bipartisan advocacy group Save Austin Now campaigned this spring to reinstate the public camping ban that Austin city leaders lifted back in 2019. The proposed ban, called Proposition B, passed in a May 1 special election, with 58 percent of voters in favor and 42 percent against. The ban now makes sitting, lying, or camping in public a criminal offense and prohibits soliciting money at certain times and locations. Now, Texas is moving toward banning camping statewide.

The clearing of encampments will be delayed to allow the city time to implement a four-phase plan that includes conducting outreach and community engagement before enforcing the ban through citations and arrests. Austin’s city manager, Spencer Cronk, said at a press conference that the city is looking into a variety of housing options, including city-sanctioned encampments—with the possibility of some on church properties. As one of its temporary solutions, the city has purchased three hotels to help with the transition to permanent housing.

Stone’s downtown church was highly vocal against the ban, including its senior pastor, Taylor Fuerst, who preached against it prior to early voting. Christ Church on the east side, where Dampier has been building relationships with members of the homeless community, was more divided.

In Dampier’s 800–900 person congregation, those in favor of reinstating the camping ban argued that the city failed to find housing solutions in the two years that the ban was lifted and raised concerns about the lack of dignity and vulnerability of living on the streets. Last year was one of the deadliest for people experiencing homelessness in Austin, with at least 256 deaths, KUT reported, based on figures from Austin’s street newspaper The Challenger.

Even those against the ban did not want to see people living permanently in encampments, Dampier said, but they were concerned about the lack of space at shelters to house them. Most of the people he spoke with preferred a more phased-out approach to empower those in encampments and incentivize cleanup.

For years, Christians in Austin have offered aid and assisted in rehousing, and those efforts have continued during the pandemic. In downtown Austin, Trinity Center provides meals, bus passes, and case management, and in East Austin, Angel House, Austin Baptist Chapel’s soup kitchen, has remained opened for breakfast.

Austin’s well-known Mobile Loaves & Fishes food truck ministry has served millions of meals since 1998, and its tiny house Community First! Village is planning its fourth phase of development that will add 1,400 tiny houses over the next decade to its existing 500-house, 51-acre full-service community northeast of town.

First United Methodist houses a Mobile Loaves & Fishes food truck and supplies volunteers for its downtown run. Prepandemic, the congregation also fed breakfast to 250–300 people twice a week followed by a worship service, and it continues to provide showers for women.

Mission Possible sets up Church Under the Bridge, where four churches sponsor a Sunday a month to host weekly worship at encampment sites beneath overpasses.

Amy and Simon Kenyon, members of Christ Church, can walk to the bridge at Sixth Street and I-35 where they’ve been leading services for 50–60 people on the first Sunday of the month for eight years. They hand out sausage wraps and coffee, which is secondary to the worship service, they said.

The Kenyons consider the gospel as the transformative factor for those experiencing homelessness. “It’s shocking to us how little faith Christians have in the gospel,” Amy Kenyon said. “It’s usually heart issues that lead people to the streets.”

Factors around homelessness abound, according to social worker Emily Seales, and include trauma, domestic violence, chronic health conditions, growing up in foster care, mental health diagnoses, intellectual disabilities, issues with the criminal justice system, and systemic racism and housing policy, atop the lack of affordable housing.

Simon Kenyon, who is ordained through the Communion of Evangelical Episcopal Churches, said that he believes in more potential for those on the streets and that God has a better plan for them.

“I think of Ephesians 2:10,” he said, “to be God’s workmanship; something that he’s created beforehand for each one of us to do and to be.”

The Kenyons voted to reinstate the camping ban partly to help incentivize getting off the streets but also because they were told by those experiencing homelessness that Austin streets have become more dangerous due to the influx of people from other states.

Despite those perceptions, 83 percent of people who are homeless in Austin started that journey in Austin or Texas, according to Seales. With the passage of Prop B, “there’s literally nowhere to go,” she said. “People will go deeper into the woods, or there will be efforts in the same place over and over again to help people move along.”

Some Christians are trying to simplify and accelerate the process of helping those experiencing homelessness by partnering with various agencies under one roof.

Sunrise Homeless Navigation Center provides that kind of integrated model. The ministry grew out of Sunrise Community Church’s desire to offer assistance to those in several nearby south Austin encampments. The center now serves food and offers showers, an address for mail, mental health workers, a health clinic, and housing case managers.

Over six years, Sunrise has become its own entity with five paid staff and more than 100 volunteers, although it still shares a building with the church. They work together with various agencies’ staff to serve 200–300 clients every day and recently helped house their 550th person, said Mark Hilbelink, lead pastor of the church and director of the navigation center.

Hilbelink operates from a Calvinist theology, he said, that believes strongly in God’s election of people. “We’re not constantly in fear of people’s salvation status,” he said. For that reason, the social work aspect takes precedence over evangelism, he said.

Sunrise’s current goal is to replicate its integrative model through a program called Compass Network that helps train and connect churches with the social services community. Sunrise adheres to the approach that handouts need to go hand in hand with a connection to the larger social services community. Hilbelink has also been mentoring Leah Hargrave, a deacon at Mosaic Church and director of Mosaic Street Ministry, to create a navigation center in north Austin.

Currently Sunrise is working with three teams of four to seven churches per team that have adopted a nearby microhomeless population (about 100 people). Christians with different theologies and different politics have come together to help, Hilbelink said.

“They would never worship together,” he said, “but they are on this team because mission is on the forefront and everything else is behind.”

On Sundays, a church from one team, with the help of interns from a variety of Texas universities, sets up a citywide database, ID printers, and connections to referral systems at a shopping center parking lot that is within one mile of the churches. The church hands out aid, while the interns work on the social services part. One location in south Austin has already helped house 20 people.

Christians, like at Sunrise and Community First! Village, have developed some novel ideas that focus on more-integrated services and a communal approach, and cities all over the country are examining those models.

In 2020, more than half a million people experienced homelessness in the United States, a 2.2 percent increase from 2019, according to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The lifting of national and local eviction moratoriums and the end of pandemic unemployment benefits by end of summer will also contribute to people losing their homes. Other municipalities—such as suburban Seattle and Aurora, Colorado—have considered similar camping bans.

Due to a housing crisis in Austin and other cities—rents have risen 3.3 percent since 2019 and 1.6 percent nationally—Hilbelink believes homelessness will become one of the biggest problems America will face in the next 10–15 years and will require an army to tackle.

To take up the challenge, some churches will donate money, some will volunteer with an organization, others will adopt a micropopulation, and some will build navigation centers, Hilbelink said. Others, such as Seales and Stone, will advocate with city and state governments about equity and social justice issues, affordable housing, and living wages.

“Every church is going to have to figure out what our response to this is going to be,” Hilbelink said.

Deborah Pardo-Kaplan is a writer in Austin, Texas.

Theology

3 Keys to Real Pandemic Recovery

The Old Testament offers a model for how to restore community and economic life after disaster.

Christianity Today May 25, 2021
Illustration by Mallory Rentsch / Source Images: Zdenek Sasek / Getty Images / CDC / Unsplash

In all likelihood, in the history of the 2020s, COVID-19 will be a footnote. When our great-grandchildren think about the 2020s, they will probably remember the pandemic just as little as we—until last March—remembered the Spanish flu of 1918–1919.

Pandemics and other natural disasters are rarely history-shaping events by themselves. Instead, natural disasters accelerate and intensify cultural realities and trends.

This is why my Praxis colleagues and I wrote a piece in March 2020 arguing that the lasting “ice age,” the long-term effects of COVID-19, would be more about economy than epidemiology. The little ice age would not so much be the twelve to eighteen months of pandemic “winter” itself but the dislocation and social change that would be left behind.

Today we see three major dislocations, not caused by the pandemic but accelerated by it, that should shape the horizon of Christian action in the next decade.

First, the K-shaped recovery.

We speculated last spring about whether the economic recovery would be V- or U- or L-shaped, but in fact it has been K-shaped. Some asset classes, like large public equities, have done incredibly well. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of small businesses that were viable before the pandemic have closed entirely.

Work has been K-shaped. Almost no one enjoyed this past year, but if you could work from home with screens and words and symbols, it was a lot more bearable and doable than if you worked away from home with people or with things.

Even within companies, there are K-shaped dynamics. As Sequoia Capital wrote in March, “We’re seeing a difference between how business metrics are performing and how many people in those companies are feeling.” That rings true.

This is an acceleration of previously existing trends. For decades now, the global capitalist economy has seen what statisticians call mean-median divergence, with vast benefits accruing to the fortunate and greater precariousness accruing to the rest.

For many, the experience of the past year was K-shaped. Most of us, more than we would have expected, found ways to thrive this year. But some of us have faced terrible loss or are embedded in communities that faced terrible loss.

We did not see the K-shaped recovery coming, but we could have and maybe should have—because K-shaped is the shape of our world.

The K-shaped recovery is by no means the only story that will be told about 2020 and beyond.

The most important resource in any system, especially under pressure, is trust. This year, we discovered afresh how many of our institutions are K-shaped—serving some populations quite effectively while serving others desperately poorly. This is hardly news. But what accelerated during the last year is a collapse of trust that these institutions can be redeemed.

We would like to believe that social institutions are built on foundations of fairness, so that they could eventually be improved to serve everyone well. But in the 2020s—and this is the second long-term trend that accelerated this past year—more and more Americans believe that these institutions are fundamentally unfair, designed to serve and protect only the upper half of the K.

This was true for many of those invading the US Capitol on January 6, who had become convinced that the country’s institutions of democratic elections had been corrupted. It was also true for many of those who protested last summer after the murder of George Floyd, calling for the abolishing of institutions of public justice on the grounds that they are hopelessly corrupt.

And this erosion of social trust took place, not by coincidence, in a time of massive bandwidth compression—the third trend the pandemic has accelerated.

When people are together in person, we are probably exchanging gigabits per second of information. Through multiple sensory channels—sight, hearing, and much more—we absorb and transmit what we are thinking and, more importantly, feeling. During the pandemic, that information stream narrowed dramatically. We went from gigabits in person to megabits on Zoom—a thousandfold reduction. Text messages, tweets, and Facebook posts are measured in kilobits—a further thousandfold compression.

When we compress information, we lose context. We lose emotion. We can transmit the “facts,” but we lose the meaning. It is fine to text your spouse to get milk from the grocery. It is almost always not fine to text to say you’re sorry you forgot their birthday.

Trust can be broken at a distance (as in that text message!), but it is almost impossible to restore at a distance.

Most of the real challenge in any conflict comes down to this question: Do you understand what it was like to be me at the moment of rupture, the moment when things went wrong? And almost always, to attain that level of empathy (to have some sense of what it was like) and to communicate it (to have you believe I understand) requires in-person presence.

These trends—K-shaped dynamics, loss of social trust, and bandwidth compression—were already in place before COVID-19, but the virus accelerated them. No real recovery from this pandemic will be complete without addressing them.

Indeed, I’ve been asking myself, “How do you recover from a K-shaped recovery?”

There is a biblical model for how to recover from a multifaceted disaster. The ancient world was also K-shaped. Disease and famine could lead to crippling debt. War could displace families and communities, even whole nations. All these led to enslavement—the ultimate loss of freedom, the ultimate K-shaped social reality.

And for a society that was always in danger of going K-shaped, God prescribed Jubilee.

Jubilee, described principally in Leviticus 25, was an economic reset. Every fifty years, debts were to be canceled so that no family could end up permanently on the wrong side of misfortune or even misbehavior. Land was to be restored to families, preventing the concentration of wealth in fewer and fewer hands and preventing the creation of a perpetual landless servile class.

Jubilee was an institutional reset. Power couldn’t end up permanently benefiting, and in the hands of, a small elite.

Jubilee was a reset of persons to a place where they could be known. By returning to their land with clear title, even those who had lost everything could be freed from homelessness and alienation, restored to home and reconciliation.

Imagine the effects of this kind of national-level, economic, institutional forgiveness. Imagine the jubilation as those who had ended up in bondage were freed. Imagine the freedom, also, of those who were “winners” in the old system no longer having to coerce and dominate their brothers and sisters.

This would be a world where, as Isaiah said, the poor would have the good news proclaimed to them. What good news? That they were no longer enslaved to their debts; that their loss, their mistrust, their shame had been wiped away; that the day of the Lord had come.

Jubilation is the result of forgiveness. Jubilation is the result of mercy. Jubilation is the result of the true God being known, worshiped, and obeyed.

And this is the day that Jesus said, in his first public address in Luke 4, had come to fulfillment. We pray for it every time we say the prayer he taught us, in Matthew 6. “Forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors.” This is a prayer for Jubilee to come. For trust to be reestablished by costly, genuine repentance, forgiveness, and mercy.

But we are at a perilous moment—even as the peril of the pandemic seems to be receding in the US, and we pray will quickly recede in other parts of the world.

One hundred years ago, the Spanish flu, which came on the heels of the Great War, receded. It was followed by the Roaring Twenties. We can totally understand what people at the time were feeling. This summer is going to feel like that in some places—euphoria and jubilation.

But the Roaring Twenties were followed by the most devastating decade of the twentieth century, at least in economic and geopolitical terms. Because in fact they were built on a precarious, K-shaped world order.

Most notably, the Treaty of Versailles imposed on Germany a war reparations debt of 132 billion gold marks—$269 billion in today’s terms. It was a ruinous settlement that arguably was a major factor in the collapse of the German financial system in 1931. Within a year, that triggered similar crises in the UK and the US and set off hyperinflation in Germany that directly contributed to the rise of National Socialism.

The Roaring Twenties were jubilation without Jubilee. Beware of jubilation without Jubilee.

What will our own twenties be? Much of what will shape this decade is beyond our power. And it may seem like a comprehensive reset on the scale of Jubilee is unimaginable. But that was true as well of the world of the first Christians. The prayer Jesus taught them both reinforced the utter necessity of Jubilee-level forgiveness and also emphasized that it could begin with a personal and local commitment: as we forgive our debtors .

We cannot reset all the K-shaped dynamics of our world, but we can deploy our personal and organizational resources to care especially for those on the wrong side of this “recovery.” Restoring trust in the largest-scale social institutions may seem beyond our ability, but many of us have opportunities every day to make the organizations and communities we are part of more truthful and more trustworthy. And we can choose to move in the opposite direction from bandwidth compression, lavishing time and resources on the personal, face-to-face encounters that are essential to healthy conflict and creative restoration.

This is a glad moment. But it is also a moment for decisive, redemptive action—a time to ensure that all our strategies, all our operations, and all our leadership are J-shaped, not K-shaped.

And the course of the 2020s may depend, more than we can now imagine, on whether we can offer a taste of Jubilee to a K-shaped world.

Andy Crouch is partner for theology and culture at Praxis. From 2015 to 2017 he was executive editor of CT.

This article is adapted from a talk delivered to the 2021 Praxis Redemptive Imagination Summit on May 17. This episode of The Redemptive Edge podcast explores these ideas in greater depth.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube