News

Wanted: More Christians to Dig in Israel

New tourism initiatives recruit vacationers to volunteer for archaeological excavations.

Excavation of a rural estate near Rahat, Israel.

Excavation of a rural estate near Rahat, Israel.

Christianity Today October 12, 2022
AP Photo/Tsafrir Abayov

Biblical archaeology is back in full swing in Israel—after a two-year pandemic delay—and now the digs across the country are going to get a new boost from tourist-volunteers.

Israel’s Tourism Ministry has launched a new initiative aimed at getting Christian tourists involved in excavations. And a group affiliated with the American Society of Overseas Research (ASOR), the largest organization for professional American archaeologists working in Israel, is starting a 13-day tour with visits to 27 sites.

American archaeologists working in Israel welcome the new programs. Encouraging “archaeotourism” is good for archaeology—boosting the local economy, cultivating interested in the ongoing academic work, and supplying archaeologists with a steady flow of volunteers.

“We couldn’t get anything accomplished without them,” said Steve Ortiz, director of the Lanier Center for Archaeology at Lipscomb University in Nashville, Tennessee. Ortiz co-led a 10-year excavation at Tel Gezer, and is now a codirector of the Tel Burna Archaeological Project.

Getting tourists involved in archaeology isn’t a new idea. Israeli archaeologist Yigael Yadin sought out and recruited volunteers for the excavation of the famous site of Masada in the 1960s. Ever since, a stream of people have paid their own way to the Holy Land to dig, haul, and sift dirt, spending part of a vacation contributing to the grunt work of scholarship and the chance to touch a little bit of biblical history.

Every year, until travel was halted for COVID-19, hundreds of tourists visited archaeological sites in Israel. Archaeotourism is also promoted in neighboring Jordan and Turkey.

Cynthia Shafer-Elliott, a religion professor at Baylor University in Waco, Texas, first went to Israel as part of a college class. The class connected students to a program called Dig for a Day, which promises “authentic archaeology adventures.” For Shafer-Elliott, it sparked a passion that became a career.

Now she leads Israel tours in the summer that go to archaeological sites such as Abel Beth Maacah in northern Israel. Some in her groups are students getting class credit for digging. Others are people passionate about archaeology. Some are just curious about the physical remnants of biblical history.

“Most digs, I think, are happy to have volunteers from any kind of background,” Shafer-Elliot said.

John DeLancey, of Pittsburgh-based Biblical Israel Ministries and Tours, has been leading Israel tours with an archaeological component for years. (Disclosure: The author has co-led three archaeology-focused tours with DeLancey.) Recently, DeLancey took three volunteers to Tel Dan, in northern Israel, where they spent a week helping with the excavation.

DeLancey brings years of experience, but the volunteers were newer to the process of careful digging. All were welcome on the site.

“We enjoyed having them as part of the dig,” said Jonathan Greer, visiting professor of archaeology at Grand Valley State University in Michigan and codirector of the excavation. “They worked hard.”

Some of DeLancey’s tours also give people hands-on experience at the Temple Mount Sifting Project in Jerusalem. The project has relied on tens of thousands of volunteers since it began in 2004, including schoolchildren, who sift through dirt removed from the Temple Mount. Most work for an hour or two—enough time to get a feel for it and sometimes make important discoveries.

“People come in, they have a short training session, [and] they have supervisors watching them, so they're able to participate and contribute to the project," said Ortiz, at Lipscomb.

Not all of Ortiz’s experiences with volunteers at excavations have been positive, however. Sometimes, people don’t take the experience seriously.

“That doesn’t help archaeological research,” he said. “Normally, we put them in areas where they’re not going to do damage. But we’re still for it, because people have a great time.”

There are also occasional conflicts between volunteers and archaeologists. Some of the Christians who show up to help have a narrow view of archaeology and are only interested in a dig if they think it confirms a particular view of the Bible.

Greer, at Grand Valley State, says he has had to push Christians to embrace a broader view of what we learn from archaeology. It’s too simple to say excavations always just confirm Scripture.

“Archaeology illuminates the world of the Bible,” he said. “Archaeology oftentimes clarifies or complements our understanding of the Bible. But there are other times it complicates our understanding of the Bible…. We don’t have to have this narrow view.”

There can also be political issues, as tourists find themselves interacting with Israelis and Palestinians who have different views of the disputes that have roiled the region for generations. For Christians, though, the experience of interacting with the people who live around biblical archaeology can be very rewarding, Greer said. The ASOR initiative, he noted, included a wide variety of viewpoints among its participants, and included visits to Jewish, Christian, and Muslim sites.

Despite the occasional conflicts, most archaeologists are happy to have more volunteers. Over the years, they’ve even come to admire these tourists who give part of their vacation to an excavation.

“A lot of these tourists are lifetime learners,” said Shafer-Elliott. “They want to learn how this all interacts with the Bible, with history, with archaeology. I think it's an untapped market, and I think it's a great idea.”

Gordon Govier is editor of Artifax, a quarterly biblical archaeology newsmagazine, and hosts a weekly biblical archaeology podcast The Book & The Spade.

Celebrity Funeral Becomes Thailand’s Largest Christian Outreach

Millions of fans in the Buddhist country heard the gospel at actress Tangmo’s memorial service

Christianity Today October 11, 2022
Illustration by Mallory Rentsch / Source Images: Getty / Screenshot on Instagram

After Pimduan “Duan” Nagaviroj heard about the drowning death of 37-year-old Nida Patcharaveerapong in February, she joined millions of other Thais in watching the livestream of the funeral honoring the famous TV actress, better known as Tangmo.

Duan, who works as a consul of the Royal Thai Consulate General in Penang, Malaysia, was intrigued by the gospel message presented in the three-day memorial.

“I paid attention to everything said and was most impressed by the message that Christians do not fear death,” she said. “I learned that God loves everyone, and I decided that I wanted to know him.”

After the third night of the service, she messaged the church contact listed on the livestream to learn more about Christianity, and the church staff encouraged her to find a local church. She visited Wesley Methodist Church in Penang and joined the church’s online Alpha Course, an evangelism program. “After only a few lessons, I accepted Jesus Christ as my Savior and I wanted to be baptized,” she said.

Pastors in Bangkok say Tangmo’s memorial service in March was the largest evangelistic outreach ever put on in Thailand, where 93 percent of the population is Buddhist and only about 1 percent Christian. While Tangmo was known for her appearances in Thai dramas and her tabloid-headline exploits, she also stood out as an outspoken Christian.

The livestream of the memorial brought in 12 million views, and Thai pastors say that afterward, they saw an increase in newcomers interested in learning more about Christianity.

“God opened a door through the death of a woman who loved God immensely,” said Thongchai Pradubchananurat, who pastors Bangkok’s Church of Joy and preached at Tangmo’s funeral. Tangmo’s life was not perfect, but she was saved by Jesus.”

Celebrity turned outspoken Christian

Tangmo was born in 1984, and after her parents split up when she was young, she was raised by her Christian father. She attended a Christian private school, though she rarely went to church. After she placed fourth in Miss Teen Thailand in 2002, a TV producer approached her about acting, launching her entertainment career. Tangmo soon grew a following for her work in popular dramas such as Bangkok Love Stories 2: Innocence, Club Friday The Series, and ใบไม้ที่ปลิดปลิว (The Fallen Leaf), as well as singing and modeling.

Tangmo also gained visibility through her relationship with actor and singer Pakin “Tono” Kumwilaisuk. By 2013, the two were living together. When Tangmo wanted a Christian wedding, her friend recommended she meet with Chatchai Charuwatee, pastor at Binding Hearts Church in Bangkok.

After Charuwatee shared his testimony with the pair, Tono said he wanted to become a Christian while Tangmo rededicated her life to Christ, according to the pastor. Charuwatee taught them the Bible and married them in December 2013. A few months later, he baptized the couple.

Afterward, they joined a cell group at Pradubchananurat’s church, attending regularly even as their marriage fell apart and ended in divorce in 2015. In the aftermath, Tangmo struggled with depression and was hospitalized for attempting suicide. Still, Pradubchananurat said Tangmo “was growing in her Christian faith” and continued to be involved in the church.

Tangmo spoke openly about Christianity in interviews. As a guest on the TV show Disclosure in 2017, the actress shocked the hosts when she said she wanted to be a “full-time minister of God.” She explained that she attended church three times a week for worship and small groups, and she’s seen her life change.

Pradubchananurat said Tangmo had planned to go into full-time ministry after finishing her college degree. Yet just a month after graduation, Tangmo died after falling off a speedboat into the Chao Phraya River in Bangkok.

Thailand’s largest evangelistic outreach

The mysterious circumstances surrounding her death led to massive media interest and coverage of her funeral. Fans speculated online whether the death had been an accident or attempted murder, scouring video footage, questioning the reliability of Tangmo’s friends on the boat, and poking holes in the police’s narrative. Six months after her death, prosecutors charged six suspects for recklessness leading to death.

Pradubchananurat noted that 600 family members, friends, fans, and reporters attended each night of the funeral at Liberty Church in Bangkok, and the livestream reached millions of Thais. Buddhists who had never been to church listened to worship songs, sermons by Pradubchananurat and Charuwatee, and the testimony of Tangmo’s life.

Pradubchananurat preached on John 13:1, noting that no one knows when they will die, so they should be prepared and show loved ones they care while they are still alive. He also spoke about how “to live is Christ and to die is gain” (Phil. 1:21) and the need to live a God-pleasing life, blessing others and introducing others to Jesus Christ.

Liberty ChurchCourtesy of Seree Lorgunpai / Illustration by CT
Liberty Church

In the months after the service, several hundred newcomers visited Liberty Church. CGNTV Thailand, a Korea-based Christian TV network, said that in March alone, 120 people contacted them about becoming Christians, a sixfold increase. Several other churches also noted that they saw more newcomers to their worship services after the funeral.

Pradubchananurat himself has seen the memorial’s impact in his life: When he attended the cremation of his sister-in-law at a Buddhist temple three months later, a monk told him he liked his sermon. Pradubchananurat gave him two Christian books to read. Recently as Pradubchananurat went to get a haircut, the barber recognized him from the memorial service, and the pastor used the opportunity to share the gospel.

Impact on overseas Thais

The memorial also changed the life of 40-year-old Sirimas Amatayakul Kuipers, also known as Benz, who currently lives in Chicago. Benz attended Wattana Wittaya Academy, a Christian boarding school, where she remembered singing Christian songs and hearing about God, but did not put her faith in God.

When she was 28, she received a book about the testimonies of several Thai Christian celebrities and prayed to accept Jesus in her heart. However, afterward she didn’t tell anyone about her conversion—not even her Christian husband—and without any Christian friends or mentors, she didn’t grow in her faith.

When she heard about Tangmo’s death, she was surprised to hear Pradubchananurat preach at the memorial—he was the father of one of her classmates at Wattana. She watched all three days of the memorial service.

Reverend Thongchai preaching at the memorial.  Illustration by CT / Source Images: Courtesy of Seree Lorgunpai
Reverend Thongchai preaching at the memorial.

“This was the first time that I listened to a Thai sermon and understood,” Benz said. “The messages went into my heart.”

She started listening to messages from Church of Joy, joined a church in Chicago, and reached out to Pradubchananurat about joining a cell group. The pastor encouraged her to start an online group with other overseas Thais. Today the group has grown to 11 members.

Duan in Penang is also part of the cell group. When her father heard of her conversion from Buddhism to Christianity, he worried that no one would make merit (or do good deeds to secure a better afterlife) for him and his wife after they died. Duan asked her Christian friends to pray for her father, and soon she began to see a change of heart. He bought a plane ticket to Penang to witness her baptism, despite his COVID-19 fears. On the day of the ceremony, he was moved to tears listening to the worship team practice.

“I used to be so self-centered,” Duan said. “Now my father has noticed the change and is glad to see me being more patient and joyful.”

Duan noted that she had previously followed Tangmo in the news and pitied her. But now she finds Tangmo’s interviews on her faith inspiring. “If I had not watched the memorial ceremony, I would have missed the opportunity to become Christian.”

Seree Lorgunpai is a current board member and former general secretary of the Thailand Bible Society.

News

Faith on the OpenSea: Christians Launch NFT Fundraisers

The Bible-based video game company TruPlay and the charity Compassion International step into the crypto world.

Oliver, a fox in a bear costume, and Maple, a bunny in a tiger costume, are characters in the RhymVerse, which recently held its NFT launch.

Oliver, a fox in a bear costume, and Maple, a bunny in a tiger costume, are characters in the RhymVerse, which recently held its NFT launch.

Christianity Today October 11, 2022
Courtesy of TruPlay

With big green eyes, Maple the bunny dons a bright orange tiger costume. A character in the Christian video game world called RhymVerse, her loyal and courageous personality carries her through her heroic adventures. She and her friends must face dark forces in games like Maple and the Forest of Words.

Last month, designs of Maple and six other characters were sold as non-fungible tokens (NFTs) by TruPlay, a Christian entertainment company that offers a variety of family-friendly mobile games.

NFTs like Maple are digital art pieces that can be bought and sold. When they are bought, the rights to that unique piece of art are transferred to the new owner, said TruPlay CEO and founder Brent Dusing.

In the case of the RhymVerse characters—which TruPlay says represent the first and biggest NFT release from a Christian tech company—the NFTs are a way for families to back their video game venture. Dusing said it’s “like a next-generation way to get the community involved in helping to build and support financially things they want to see.”

From South Africa to the Philippines, Christians purchased TruPlay’s first 6,650 Genesis NFTs within 10 minutes of their release, according to the company’s press release.

While TruPlay sold the NFTs for free, consumers then sold, bought, and traded them after that, with the company earning 10 percent of these transactions. The secondary sales of the NFTs yielded more than $200,000 in volume on OpenSea, the world’s largest NFT marketplace. In the first 24 hours of sales, the company placed in the Top 10 on OpenSea globally.

Dusing said he was amazed by the response and thanked God. To him, offering NFTs as a Christian company follows a long tradition of Christian involvement in the forefront of cultural movements and art.

“Jesus met people where they were … and where they are right now [is] on screens,” said Dusing. His previous venture, Lightside Games, grew to reach 7 million players—a third of whom were non-Christians, he said. With more than $20 million in investor capital, TruPlay plans to release interactive Christian games in 2023.

Other Christian groups, including charities and nonprofits, have ventured into the NFT realm with mixed success.

Utilizing NFTs can have both pros and cons for Christian organizations, said Adam Graber, cohost on the technology-focused Device & Virtue podcast. While NFTs are currently grabbing headlines, he’s unsure how long the tokens’ popularity will last. Overall NFT sales on OpenSea have dropped for five straight months.

NFT sales are closely tied with cryptocurrency since the digital assets are purchased using the cryptocurrency Ethereum.

Graber explained their connection by comparing them to the game of Monopoly: Cryptocurrency is the Monopoly money, while NFTs are the properties. Properties can change in value based on various characteristics.

“Crypto enthusiasts are still trying to make the case for what the value of both crypto and NFTs is, and until they successfully do that within sort of a market economy, there is going to continue to be skepticism around NFTs,” he said. “I think art has true value, has real value. I have yet to see NFTs convey some of that real value.”

Still, NFTs could be used to positively impact Christian organizations—namely, as fundraising or promotional tools, he said.

The nonprofit Compassion International raised money to support college scholarships for students in Haiti through virtual reality NFTs depicting Haitian landscapes. Released in July, the VR pieces combined art and technology to appeal to buyers. Sales of its NFTs resulted in more than $220,000 during the initial mint and more than $3,400 from secondary sales in OpenSea.

A group called Reformers NFT created a collection of NFTs based on Christian leaders in March. Featuring figures like John Calvin and Martin Luther, it has more than $8,000 in sales volume. The group, which calls itself “a pioneering community of Christians,” created the pieces to help Christians embrace technology, according to their OpenSea Site.

For a church in Zurich, Switzerland, NFTs were not only a fundraiser tool but also a way to try to incorporate trending technology into its mission. International Christian Fellowship (ICF) Church has always tried to be on the leading edge of new technology, said Simon Egli, head of the digital ICF Zurich team.

ICF, the mother church in a movement of more than 80 congregations across Europe, began offering members the chance to donate using cryptocurrency in 2018. Its crypto tithe option went viral, making its way across news sites and even landing on Bitcoin’s news platform.

“One of our values is being relevant—being a relevant church in the midst of our society,” Egli said. “Our team is always looking for new ideas, new solutions, finding smart solutions because our resources are limited.”

When a year ago a staff member with NFT experience joined their team, church leaders decided to try the emerging technology. The church created a series of Worship Music NFTs that reinvented songs written by the church’s band, ICF Worship. However, the music files have yet to sell on OpenSea. These musically focused NFTs might be ahead of their time, Egli said.

Dusing helped generate interest in the TruPlay NFTs by allowing followers to vote on the designs of the characters. For example, Noah the kangaroo, based on the vote tally, donned a shark outfit.

At the start of 2022, commentators Stephen McCaskell and Patrick Miller wrote for CT about the “new world of possibilities for creatives, content creators, businesses, churches, and parachurch organizations” with the launch of NFTs and the potential of digital ownership. They said, “Now is the time for believers to start thinking, programming, developing, and creating in that space.”

Should Christians Own Guns for Self-Defense? A Global Snapshot

Leaders in nine nations explain how they think theologically and biblically about personal safety as mass shootings plague the world.

Christianity Today October 10, 2022
Carlos Osorio / AP Images

Last week, a former police officer killed 36 people, many of them young children, at a daycare in northeastern Thailand. The shooting and stabbing spree came weeks after a gunman shot and killed 17 people at a school in central Russia. In July, terrorists attacked a Sunday church service in southwest Nigeria, killing dozens of worshipers.

The United States has experienced many mass shootings this year, including at a July 4 parade in suburban Chicago, where seven people were killed; at a grocery store in Buffalo, New York, where 10 people were killed; and at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, where 21 people were killed.

In the US, white evangelicals were more likely than members of other American faith groups to own a gun (41%) and more likely to say it made them feel safer (77%), according to the Pew Research Center. More than half of white evangelicals (57%) said protection was the single most important reason they own a gun.

Pew’s 2017 study found that 38 percent of white evangelicals worry about being the victim of a mass shooting, 61 percent worry about being a victim of violent crime, and 66 percent worry about being the victim of a terrorist attack.

Yet Americans who attended religious services weekly were less likely to own a gun than those who attend less frequently (27% vs. 31%), the Pew study also found. And Americans with high levels of religious commitment were less likely to own a gun than those whose commitment was low (26% vs. 33%).

CT recently reached out to church leaders from nine countries to learn more about gun ownership in their nation and their thoughts on the subject, theologically or biblically. Their answers are arranged (top to bottom) from those who believe Christians may own guns for personal safety to those who believe it violates their faith:

Nigeria | Steve Dangana, chairman, Plateau state chapter of the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria:

Nigerian citizens can own guns as long as the guns are licensed by the authorities.

Christians are called to be vanguards for peace and peacemakers in a world that is full of violence and evil. The contrast between what we are called to represent and the reality of our world today poses a challenge to owning a weapon for self-defense and other nonviolence purposes. I personally believe that it is right for a Christian to own guns for the purposes of self-defense.

The level of increased violence in our communities has assumed worrisome dimensions today. The recklessness with which innocent lives are killed on a daily basis by individuals with no conscience leaves questions in the hearts of many Christians on the ethical challenges of gun ownership. However, a look at the Bible offers some insight regarding the practices that inform this issue today.

On the night of Jesus’ betrayal, he encouraged his disciples to carry a sword. They had two, which he said was enough (Luke 22:37–39). But as Jesus was being arrested, Peter drew his sword and sliced off the ear of one of the servants of the high priest (John 18:10). Jesus responded by healing the man instantly (Luke 22:51) and then commanded Peter to put away his sword (John 18:11). Peter’s ownership of a sword was not condemned. It was only his use of it in that particular circumstance that prompted Jesus to urge restraint.

On another occasion, soldiers came to John the Baptist to be baptized. When asked what to do to live for God, John replied, “Do not extort money from anyone by threats or by false accusation, and be content with your wages” (Luke 3:14, ESV). We see John stop short of telling the soldiers to lay down their weapons.

It should be safe to opine that the Bible never forbids a Christian from owning a weapon, as long as it is used in tandem with our Christian faith and practice and brings honor to Christ, respect and value for humanity, and glory to God.

Christian are encouraged to be law-abiding as representatives of Christ and faithful citizens of their nation. Romans 13 tells us that governing authorities are from God and are to be obeyed. Therefore any gun law, as well as other local laws, is to be obeyed.

Ultimately, we see there is nothing sinful or inappropriate about owning guns or other weapons as long as it is for self-defense or other nonviolent use.

South Africa | Siki Dlanga, coordinator of a campaign against gender-based violence for the Evangelical Alliance of South Africa:

A South African can legally own up to four guns at the age of 21 or above. Each firearm must be licensed, with strict rules that go with the license.

Whether a Christian owns or does not own a gun is a matter of personal conscience. About weapons, Scripture teaches as follows: “For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ, and being ready to punish all disobedience when your obedience is fulfilled” (2 Cor. 10:4–6, NKJV).

Scripture positions the believer's protection from the spiritual realm first. Our weapons are not carnal but spiritual. We know that everything begins spiritually before it manifests in the physical realm. We cannot fight Satan with the weapons he has invented and hope to defeat him. To defeat evil, we must use spiritual weapons that are, we are told, “mighty in God.”

Furthermore, “God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind” (2 Tim. 1:7). Reliance on firepower rather than the power of love is not the way of Christ. Firepower has sown much suffering in the world, to the point that we can only hope for peace if we threaten each other with “mutually assured destruction.” That’s hardly an indicator of a civilized society with a sound mind.

South Korea | Kim Seungkyeom, senior pastor of Graceforest Community Church in Yongin:

In Korea, owning a gun is strictly restricted. Only hunting rifles are allowed. But you have to register it at the police station.

In my opinion, it is not advisable to own a gun for personal safety. If someone owns a gun for safety, another person will try to protect himself by owning a stronger gun. You can see this from the arms race of nuclear weapons. More and more nuclear weapons, stronger nuclear weapons, and a comparative advantage over other countries can make the world more and more dangerous.

Basically, personal safety issues are an area that the nation should take on. Romans 13:4 says, “For it is a servant of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a servant of God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who practices evil” (NASB).

As for individuals, the Lord said this: “‘Put your sword back in its place,’ Jesus said to him, ‘for all who draw the sword will die by the sword’” (Matt. 26:52, NIV). Strictly speaking, this is a lesson in revenge, not personal safety, but it is also a basic lesson in the use of weapons.

Christian should not rest their safety in possession of a gun, but in the grace and protection of God. Ironically, however, I have a baseball bat next to my bed in case a robber suddenly breaks in.

Switzerland | Jean-René Moret, pastor, Evangelical Church of Cologny:

We are allowed to own guns in Switzerland. We still have conscription, and most Swiss men bring their assault rifle home for storage and shooting practice. Assault riffles are allowed. Men who have served their time have the option to buy their military rifle back and keep it. Gun owners must register.

(Only men are conscripted. Women can ask to be part of the army. Those who are conscientious objectors do community service.)

Jesus' teaching and example show that Christians should rather suffer the loss of their possessions, honor, and life than answer violence with violence (Matt. 5:38–42; 1 Pet. 2:20–23). Paul in Romans 13:4 recognizes the role of the state to bear arms in order to repress evil. But this is not the individual's role.

One could consider whether owning a gun to defend vulnerable others could be admissible. It might be the case in situations of state failure and lawlessness. And even in such cases, one must ask where Christians will put their trust. Will they trust in God, or in their own weapons, strength, and abilities? (Isa. 30:15–17).

Gun violence is a consequence not only of gun ownership but also of a culture where guns are seen as providing security and solutions. Swiss people own lots of guns but don't expect to have any use of them besides hunting, sportive shooting, and the unlikely war. For Christians, guns may be an idol, a thing that asks for the trust we must put in God only.

Canada | Karen Stiller, author, editor, and journalist, Ottawa:

We can own guns, although Canada has strict gun control laws. Thorough background checks are required. More than 1,500 types of military-style assault guns were banned in Canada in 2020. Stricter legislation was brought forward recently to limit gun ownership even more.

My dad was a Mountie. I grew up in an environment where guns were present and acknowledged as a potentially dangerous but necessary part of my father’s work. We respected my dad, his work, and the uniform of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. I was glad he had a gun, because I knew it helped protect him and the people he had pledged to protect in his work and calling.

Guns have a place in the world, of course, but they are just not part of everyday life and culture in Canada like they are in the US, or I suspect, in many other places in the world. Our countries have such different histories, and we don’t have the Second Amendment and all that represents.

The different roles that guns play in lives might vary in different parts of Canada (I am a city person through and through), but I still don’t believe those who would lobby for less gun control in Canada would come close to the passion gun owners have in US culture. Even the question Should Christians own a gun for personal safety? feels very American. (And that statement of mine feels very Canadian.)

It wouldn’t occur to me for our Christian household to own a gun specifically meant for personal safety. If we did, and we followed the laws of the land (which we believe that we are compelled to follow as believers), that gun would be unloaded, locked up, and stored separately from the ammunition. So, generally speaking, an arrangement not very helpful for personal protection, no matter one’s theological position.

Australia | Sam Chan, evangelist with City Bible Forum in Sydney:

In Australia, you can own a gun, but you must have a license and register the gun. But you can’t buy automatic or semiautomatic weapons.

I’ve stayed on a farm and watched the farmer shoot feral animals. I also have friends who shoot guns as a hobby. But, by and large, gun ownership is not a large part of Australian culture.

An Australian might feel the need to own a car or home, but not a gun for personal safety. It’s just not a thing in Australia. It’s the lack of guns in Australia that makes us feel safe, rather than their availability.

In Australia we prioritize communal safety, and we expect the government to make this happen. I think we were the first country to bring in laws for mandatory seat belts for cars, helmets for bicyclists, and random breath-testing for drivers.

To that end, we’ve limited our rights of gun ownership for the safety of the community. There has not been a major mass shooting since 1996.

Paul also appeals to this in 1 Corinthians 10:23–24: “I have the right to do anything,” you say—but not everything is beneficial. “I have the right to do anything”—but not everything is constructive. No one should seek their own good, but the good of others.

Paul says that we have individual rights, but we also have personal responsibility to do what is best for the community.

Honduras | Miguel Álvarez, president of Central American Biblical Pentecostal Seminary in Quetzaltenango, Guatemala:

In Honduras, people can carry guns, but in order to do it they must register, complying with the requirements demanded by state security. Unfortunately, even in this well-intentioned process, there may be signs of corruption. Nevertheless, the law is tough on those who choose to carry guns.

I do not believe that believers in Christ should carry weapons. Bearing arms is contrary to the gospel message. There is no theological or biblical reason that justifies the use of weapons. The vocation of the believer in Christ is peaceful, not belligerent. God has given us the ability to dialogue as civilized beings about our differences in order to resolve our controversies by peaceful means. Every believer who carries weapons obviously doubts the spiritual power that is in him or her.

According to James 3:17 (ESV), “the wisdom from above is … peaceable, gentle, open to reason, full of mercy and good fruits, impartial and sincere.” Furthermore, according to Romans 12:18 (NIV), “If possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone.” God calls us to peace. The presence of weapons is contrary to peace. There is no biblical or theological justification for the use of weapons.

People who insist on bearing arms do not know God's peace, nor can they understand God's justice. Therefore, it is important to declare ourselves against war and the use of weapons to resolve human conflicts and declare ourselves in favor of peace and justice.

Philippines | Emil Jonathan Soriano, pastor of Church @ No. 71, San Pedro, Laguna:

In the Philippines, people can own guns legally, though it’s difficult. The government has very strict requirements. Nevertheless, I personally know Christians who have a license to carry guns for recreational purposes.

I do not think Christians should own guns for personal safety. God’s work in the world is to bring forth life in all its fullness (John 10:10) and conquer death (1 Cor. 15). Guns go against God’s work as they are tools of death that are designed to kill. In the Philippines, loose firearms are used for crimes and extrajudicial killings, which has led to vigilante-style assassinations in the past. Scripture asserts that tools of death should be dismantled and converted instead to tools of production and livelihood (Isa. 2:4; Mic. 4:3).

More importantly, Jesus exemplified the ethic of nonviolence, which he showed through a self-giving, co-suffering love that calls to give our lives away so that others may live (Matt. 5: 38–48; Rom. 12). In Jesus, we see that one does not need weapons to defend oneself and be safe. The early Christians followed his example; they did not seek to defend themselves by picking up arms but instead willingly laid down their lives as a witness to the gospel. This does not mean that Christians should seek martyrdom and not take precautions. Christians are invited to live in wisdom while working to transform the world into one that is grounded on peace. As Clement of Alexandria, an early Church father, once said, As simple and quiet sisters, peace and love require no arms. For it is not in war, but in peace, that we are trained.”

Singapore | Edric Sng, founder and editor of Salt&Light and Thir.st:

In Singapore, the use of guns is tightly controlled under the Arms Offences Act. Beyond our police and armed forces, it is nearly unheard of for anyone to be seen carrying or using a gun. The rare instances would immediately make front-page headlines.

Simply put, this means we in Singapore can go about life never once worrying about the threat of gun violence.

In Luke 22, just after the Last Supper, Jesus prepares his disciples for the impending season when they will have to carry on the mission without their teacher. “If you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one,” Jesus tells them in verse 36. A sword in those days would have been useful for many things. To hunt. To harvest. As a multipurpose tool.

And, yes, it was a weapon—but that was evidently not Jesus’ intent. If Jesus had meant for the disciples to carry arms for war, he would not have told them that two swords between the lot of them was enough (v. 38). He would have told them to load up! The more the safer!

But it is clear the swords were neither for attack nor for self-defense. Within hours, in Luke 22:49–51, Jesus is arrested. Peter draws his sword to fend off the delegation led by the traitor Judas. But instead of a commendation, he draws Jesus’ rebuke: “Put your sword away!” (according to John 18:11).

Is it foolish to be defenseless in a hostile world, where everyone else is carrying a weapon? By man’s reckoning, probably. But would it be any wiser in God’s reckoning to hold a weapon that can so easily take the life of another, even in self-defense? Why imagine the life of one—you or your family—be worth more than that of another?

If the world is armed, must we therefore follow—or would that make us just like the world?

With reporting help from Jennifer Park

Books
Review

Narnia was C.S. Lewis’s Literary Petri Dish

It provided a controlled environment where he could develop, observe, and test his ideas about life and faith.

Christianity Today October 10, 2022
Illustration by Chanelle Nibbelink

Though C. S. Lewis died many decades before the rise of the New Atheists, he taught and wrote in an academic world where naturalism, scientism, and secular humanism were ascendant and the Christian worldview was either dismissed or relegated to the personal, emotional realm. In the refined Oxbridge atmosphere in which Lewis lived and moved and had his being, most professors took for granted that miracles did not happen, that Jesus was just a good, moral teacher, and that evolution was a sufficient theory to explain everything we see around us and experience within us.

The Case for Aslan: Evidence for Jesus in the Land of Narnia

In response to this reigning materialist paradigm, one he had vehemently embraced throughout his teens and 20s, Lewis wrote three works of apologetics that have not lost any of their power. In Mere Christianity, he first argued for the existence of God on moral grounds and then clarified the essential teachings of the gospel, biblical morality, and Christian theology. In The Problem of Pain, he reconciled the ubiquity of pain and suffering in the world with the all-good and all-powerful God of the Scriptures. In Miracles, he argued that miracles do not break the laws of nature but are consistent with the God revealed in Christ and the Bible.

While vigorously but genially defending the Christian worldview, he also defended, in such academic works as The Allegory of Love and The Discarded Image, the Christian Middle Ages from fashionable—but mostly false—charges of ignorance, superstition, and authoritarianism. Meanwhile, in The Screwtape Letters and The Great Divorce, he countered the Freudians and Marxists by analyzing the theological and psychological dimensions of sin and temptation, and upholding, if slightly repackaging, traditional Christian teachings on heaven and hell, salvation and damnation, angels and devils.

Were that all that Lewis did and wrote, he would deserve the title of greatest Christian apologist of the 20th century. But he went a step further. He took his best logical arguments for the full depth and breadth of the Christian worldview and incarnated them in 10 novels that make the case for Christianity in an imaginative and immersive manner that lingers in the heart as well as the mind. While his Space (or Ransom) Trilogy and Till We Have Faces gain deservedly more and more readers with each passing year, his seven Chronicles of Narnia remain milestones in the history of apologetics: works that empower us to see Christianity afresh by allowing it to play out in a controlled world.

In The Case for Aslan: Evidence for Jesus in the Land of Narnia, David Marshall goes so far as to describe the Narnia books as a sort of literary petri dish. Just as scientists use petri dishes to initiate and then observe the growth of bacteria, so writers like Lewis “create worlds of thought, isolate characters within them, lend them an environment, then watch (often in surprise) how they react.” That does not mean Lewis manipulates or infantilizes his readers, as some have accused him of doing, but that he offers them an imaginative window into the way our world, and we ourselves, work.

An experimental world

Narnia, Marshall argues, “is no retreat into childhood. It is a virtual reality, a medium in which Lewis creates an experimental world and discovers truth with deep implications for our lives. Narnia is a controlled environment in which ideas about faith and reason, life and death, miracles and sin, are isolated, nurtured, observed, and tested under critical conditions.”

Puddleglum, for instance, is a fictional and fantastical character. But when, in The Silver Chair, he employs Pascal’s wager against a witch who tries to convince him and his companions that their world is only an illusion, he becomes a serious and accessible philosopher of the human condition. He teaches modern readers of all ages by showing them that faith, in Marshall’s words, “does not mean believing without evidence, but in the face of confusion, temptation, fear, and our personal or collective smokescreens.”

Marshall, an author, apologist, former missionary in China, and founder-director of the Kuai Mu Institute for Christianity and World Cultures, has been debating the New Atheists for two decades. In his new book, he carries that debate into Narnia, where he encourages Lewis’s fans and critics alike to be like Trumpkin, the grouchy, naysaying, unbelieving dwarf who, in Prince Caspian, comes to believe in Aslan and the miracles and moral standards that come with him. “Lewis drops clues in Narnia to help even Trumpkins who study the New Testament skeptically for a living find the real Aslan, whom no one could invent,” writes Marshall. “‘Aslan’ invites us to play the role of Trumpkin, to look hard, reach out our hands, and ask tough questions, too.”

Over the course of The Case for Aslan, Marshall explores such central Narnian (and Christian) themes as creation ex nihilo (from nothing), the nature of good and evil, the uniqueness of Aslan (Jesus), and the historicity of the Resurrection, borrowing insights from Plato, philosopher Alvin Plantinga, psychologist M. Scott Peck, and intelligent design theorists as he goes. He is at his best, however, when he takes up one of the most controversial topics in all the Chronicles: the fate of Susan.

Near the end of The Last Battle, the seven friends of Narnia (Peter, Edmund, Lucy, Eustace, Jill, Digory, and Polly) awake from a train wreck to find themselves in Aslan’s Country (heaven). Tirian, the last king of Narnia, is excited to meet these mythical heroes but is surprised to discover that Susan is not with them. Susan, as it turns out, is no longer a friend of Narnia, having traded in her love for Aslan for the petty vanities of lipstick, nylons, and invitations. Jill complains that Susan has made the mistake of growing up, but the wiser Polly corrects her, explaining that Susan’s real problem is that she has not grown up at all.

According to J. K. Rowling, creator of Harry Potter, Lewis essentially writes off Susan for becoming interested in sex. For Philip Pullman, author of the self-proclaimed anti-Narnia, anti-God trilogy His Dark Materials, the incident with Susan offers further proof that the Chronicles are misogynistic and anti-life. But the passage says nothing about boys or sex, and the fact that Lucy is the most spiritually mature of the children, with Jill and Polly exhibiting great courage and wisdom, neutralizes any simplistic charges of sexism.

“Rowling and Pullman,” Marshall explains, “completely misread the story of Susan. Her problem wasn’t sex or growing up: she had beaus in Narnia, as did Mr. and Mrs. Beaver, for that matter. And her ‘judgment’ was not hell, it was that she missed out (for now) on what she purposely rejected: she was granted the grownup right to avoid a party she didn’t wish to attend!” Lewis shows his respect for Susan by allowing her the autonomy to choose and to live with the consequences of her choices.

Digory’s defense

Marshall circles back several times to the problem of Susan, for he knows that Rowling and Pullman’s critique disguises their wider critique of orthodox Christianity. Indeed, near the end of his book, Marshall constructs an entertaining but convicting dialogue in which Rowling and Pullman, together with critical race theorists Robin DiAngelo and Ibram X. Kendi, attempt to “cancel” the Narnia books for their supposed racism and sexism. To defend Lewis and his creative petri dish, Marshall appoints professor Digory Kirke.

For Pullman, the main issue that justifies cancelling Narnia—and Aslan, its messianic lion king—“is the trauma your man inflicts on young women by making them feel guilty for exploring their sexual nature! You want to turn this discussion into anything but what it is: a needed rebuke to the cruelty of the man [Lewis] you neglect to defend!”

“Susan,” Kirke explains, “grew fearful of love. And that, I fear, as Aslan put it, is a warning to your world.” Unflustered and unconvicted, Pullman responds: “I may not believe in God, but I know that a woman’s right to choose is sacred.” Pullman’s answer provokes the applause he expects from the crowd, but it also causes him to fall right into Kirke’s hands:

If choice is free, how can some choices not be wrong? [Jane] Austen, [George] Eliot, and the Bronte sisters created worlds in which a woman’s choice meant something: an affair, a grudge, a spiteful visit to your nephew’s lover, a wrong choice in lovers, all bore consequences. But “celebrating choice” without considering whether those choices lead to heaven or hell, infantilizes women, in the name of liberating them.

The Case for Aslan is littered with such insights, but it is not a book for all tastes. Those lacking a good working knowledge of the Chronicles of Narnia and Lewis’s apologetical works will likely feel lost, as Marshall makes frequent, scattershot references to Lewis’s many books—often as many as four in a single sentence. He also has a penchant for chasing down rabbit holes, including personal reminiscences, that disrupt the flow of the argument.

Still, readers who, like myself, enjoy being assaulted with rapid-fire Lewis trivia and are willing to follow Marshall’s creative tangents will find themselves transported to a magic world where every sign points to the Way, the Truth, and the Life.

Louis Markos is professor in English and scholar in residence at Houston Christian University, where he holds the Robert H. Ray Chair in Humanities. His books include Lewis Agonistes: How C.S. Lewis Can Train Us to Wrestle with the Modern and Postmodern World and Restoring Beauty: The Good, the True, and the Beautiful in the Writings of C.S. Lewis.

Theology

Distinguishing Scripture from Hindu Mythology

Indian Christians grapple with heresies and cultural confusion.

Christianity Today October 10, 2022
Illustration by Mallory Rentsch / Source Images: Aaron Burden / Unsplash

American evangelicals are moving away from orthodox understandings of God and Scripture. This year’s State of Theology survey revealed the top five misconceptions that US evangelicals hold, as follows:

  • Jesus isn’t the only way to God.
  • Jesus was created by God.
  • Jesus is not God.
  • The Holy Spirit is not a personal being.
  • Humans aren’t sinful by nature.

CT reached out to three Christian leaders from Bengaluru, Chennai, and New Delhi to learn what modern heresies are widespread in India and how believers can address them.

Jacob Cherian, dean of faculty at Southern Asia Bible College, Bengaluru, Karnataka

Unfortunately, Western evangelicals do not possess a monopoly on modern heresies, which I’ll loosely define as deviations from commonly held orthodox teachings. Popular and unhealthy theological trends quickly find welcoming minds in India.

While believing in the authority of Scripture, we often struggle to parse out what that entails and how Scripture could be appropriated in the nitty-gritties of Indian contexts. A pernicious problem of using random bits of Scripture (such as Christian healers quoting “By his stripes we are healed”) remains a pet weakness of far too many.

While we do see a plague of blatant and flashy prosperity teaching, many evangelicals and charismatics have succumbed to a soft-prosperity gospel, imagining that God owes the believer a long and comfortable trip through this world, apart from a wonderful future in heaven. This ill-prepares believers to courageously face illness, tragedy, and death.

Leaders must instead teach the church both the harsh vulnerability of life and the bold hope we have in Christ, even as we courageously engage in kingdom work.

John Simeon, pastor of Christ Methodist Church, Chennai, Tamil Nadu

Not everyone in the church would say out loud that the Bible is not literally true. But in their lifestyle, they show that they choose what is convenient in the Bible. I would say 60 percent would say that the Bible is to be treated on par with the other Hindu mythologies like Ramayana and Mahabharata.

The current reconstruction of the traditions of so-called ancient India, [which has very little historic basis], is also having an adverse impact on the Christians. There is a sense Christianity is from an alien culture, and these feelings of inferiority and rejection make one hesitant to share the Good News of Christ with others.

About half of Indians would probably say that Jesus isn’t the only way to God. They’re more likely to say that Jesus is the way to God for Christians.

As I observe the reaction of people under 40, we need to give Christians a strong theological education by teaching them how to read Scripture systemically and use terminologies and idioms that are familiar to them. We should show them the relevance of Scripture for their lives and use mediums they are familiar with.

Samuel Richmond, resident of New Delhi and director of the Centre for Advanced Religious Studies, North East Christian University, Dimapur, Nagaland

The church as the body of the Lord Jesus Christ has faced challenges within (heresies) and outside (persecution).

One of the present challenges that is confronting the church is New Age spirituality. The New Agers are trying to find God within themselves rather than looking for him who is transcendent.

Atheists believe there is no God. Christians, on the other hand, believe there is a God but deny him in their actions. We end up contradicting what we proclaim and how we live. Christian leaders preach about dependency on God but accumulate wealth, crave power, and look out for positions. Practical atheism has led to corruption where we are depending on ourselves and not depending on God.

Finally, many in the Indian church today teach and practice that if you do not have the gift of tongues, you are not saved.

Lack of education has caused people to receive whatever is served to them. In-depth teaching of God’s Word and education will help them question what is taught to them.

In the pluralistic New Age and immoral society, the proclamation of the Word of God should become the central theme of our mission. It will take the church’s boldness for the world to identify the power of the revelation of the triune God.

News

First Study of Chinese Churches in Britain Examines Boom and Possible Bust

Pastors and theologians respond to opportunities and challenges in new study on explosive growth from Hong Kong immigration.

Christianity Today October 8, 2022
Wongseok Kim

For many Hong Kong immigrants to Britain, a church is their first point of connection.

Chinese pastors in the UK report their congregations have doubled or tripled in size. One church in Manchester has multiplied from less than 200 attendees to 1,200 due to the recent influx of immigrants from Hong Kong.

The impact of all these worshipers is shown in a new report on Chinese Christianity in Britain, the first systematic study of its kind. Led by Yinxuan Huang, a research fellow at London School of Theology (LST), its findings were released October 8 at a seminary symposium.

The study concluded that Chinese non-Christian immigrants are open to Christianity and ready to hear the gospel. But its data also suggests several obstacles to faith remain.

Though they are slowly becoming more outward-looking, Chinese churches have long been insular. And if Chinese Christians don’t mobilize fast enough, they risk missing a key evangelism window, as the study found British-born Chinese to be less receptive to the faith.

“The study is correct to say that children and youth ministries [in Chinese churches] are booming,” said Alexander Chow, a Chinese American lecturer in theology and World Christianity at the University of Edinburgh.

“But what happens beyond that? That’s quite a critical question, not only for British-born Chinese but for the 1.5-generation Hong Kong migrant now.”

Church growth spurt

Billed as the “largest study of its kind in Europe,” the Bible and the Chinese Community in Britain (BCCB) research project is a joint initiative between LST and the British and Foreign Bible Society. The latter released a report on these findings on October 22, 2023.

It seeks to develop an “expansive understanding” of the Chinese Christian community’s spiritual and religious characteristics, explore their level of scripture engagement, and encourage the development of more scholarship on how technology and social media can serve their communities.

Huang, the study’s lead researcher, is originally from Shanghai, China, and is now based in Oxford, England. Besides analyzing secondary data, he conducted a nationwide online survey which gathered 1,179 responses from ethnic Chinese—both Christians and non-Christians—in England, Scotland, and Wales. He also conducted 51 interviews with Christian leaders who were both ethnically Chinese and dedicated to serving the Chinese diaspora in Britain.

Among its key findings, the study asserts that Chinese churches have become the fastest growing Christian community in Britain since 2021, due to Hong Kongers.

Most Hong Kong immigrants have arrived in Britain via the British National (Overseas) or BNO visa program, which was launched in January 2021 to allow British nationals in Hong Kong to live and work in the UK and apply for British citizenship within six years. (More than 133,000 visas have been granted as of June.)

About 480,000 Protestants—spanning 70 denominations and 1,450 churches—live in Hong Kong, according to a factsheet published by the special administrative region this year. Almost 1 in 4 Hong Kong immigrants to the UK are Christian, the study estimated.

Many are pastors or Christian workers who take up leadership roles in Cantonese-speaking ministries upon moving to Britain. There are now more than 200 Chinese Christian communities and organizations in the UK, according to the BCCB study, and at least 17 were established in the past 18 months.

But such growth is only temporary and is difficult to maintain, says Peter Brierley, a consultant who has qualitatively and quantitatively studied UK church statistics for 50 years.

“You can’t depend on immigrants to grow the church on a long-term basis,” he said. “Immigrants bring vitality, energy, and new thinking. But these are not sufficient.”

Non-Christian Chinese, particularly first-generation Hong Kong Chinese, tend to be curious and open to the Christian faith while second-generation British-born Chinese tend to be dismissive about it, according to the BCCB report.

Only 18 percent of non-Christian respondents expressed a dismissive posture toward Christianity. And non-Christians from Hong Kong (63%) demonstrated a greater interest in exploring the Bible than mainland Chinese (41%) and British-born Chinese (19%).

This openness to Christianity may arise because these immigrants connect it with societal progress and regard the faith as a “foundational component in Western culture and civilization,” said Chow.

The church’s social function also plays a part in cultivating interest in the gospel. “The church is where [immigrants can] experience altruism and acceptance,” Huang said. “It is the beginning of evangelism.”

Embracing Christianity can be a “pragmatic” decision, said Mark Nam, an Anglican curate in the diocese of Bristol and one of the first British-born Chinese to be ordained in the Church of England. “When my grandparents settled in the UK, they made their children members of the church choir as they wanted them to integrate.”

Redefining evangelism

Despite this discernible openness to the faith, most Chinese believers living in Britain do not evangelize actively.

While the Bible is at the center of the average Chinese Christian’s life (more than 90 percent say they are “likely” or “very likely” to use the Bible to maintain relationships with others), less than half feel confident when talking about Jesus with someone else, according to the BCCB study.

Only 42 percent have shared their faith (including biblical messages) with family, friends, and colleagues in the last 12 months, researchers reported.

Huang cautioned that this number should not be regarded as a measure of how missional Chinese believers are compared to other Christians. Instead, it is relative to other forms of how Chinese Christians engage with Scripture, such as how much they agreed with the statement that reading or listening to the Bible makes them feel “closer to God” (88%) or that the Bible was their “best friend” (60%). Compared to these other forms of engaging with Scripture, then, evangelizing to others through sharing the Word of God is practiced less.

Nevertheless, most of the Christian leaders CT interviewed acknowledged this hesitancy and attributed it to the average Chinese Christian’s lack of theological training.

“It’s not that they don’t want to talk about Christianity, but that they don’t have the answers to questions from non-Christians. This makes it very hard to initiate [conversations],” Huang said.

Calida Chu, a Hong Kongese theologian at the University of Nottingham’s department of theology and religious studies, believes that Chinese Christians may refrain from evangelizing because of the hierarchical structure implicit within the conventional Chinese family unit, where parents are seen as authority figures.

Mainland Chinese immigrants entering the UK to study also often have parents who are Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members, and it is “quite impossible” for a family to “abandon their membership,” she added.

In Chow’s eyes, new missional aspects in the Chinese Christian community have been developing, and evangelism is simply one component of it.

Chow stressed the fact that churches in Britain have had a long history of engaging with Chinese immigrants, and that evangelism is now being “reconfigured” mainly because of the new wave of Hong Kong migration.

“Historically, there was a strong [missional] effort in places like Liverpool, London, and Birmingham because of the Chinese population that was there, from seafarers to restaurant workers and students,” Chow said.

Chinese people make up 0.7 percent of the UK population, according to the 2011 census. Chinese communities have been present in London and Liverpool since the early 19th century, and the first permanent large-scale settlement occurred in the 1950s. The Chinese Overseas Christian Mission (COCM) was established during this time and helped to found many Chinese churches.

Engaging Hong Kong immigrants by helping them navigate the British system and addressing their practical, emotional, and spiritual needs is one new form of missional engagement, said Chow.

Looking outward

Of the 45 pastors Huang interviewed for the BCCB study, “not a single one” was concerned about outreach, he said.

This may be due to the overwhelming amount of work that pastors are now engaged in with the influx of new immigrants into Britain. A single pastor now takes care of more than 80 congregants on average, according to the BCCB study. This situation can easily leave them with little room to think of engaging people outside of the church.

Nam, however, says that Chinese churches are doing a “very good job” of welcoming and supporting new Hong Kongers in the UK.

“Churches ecumenically mobilized far more quickly than society for once,” said Nam. He noted the Hong Kong exodus is the biggest migration to the UK outside of Windrush, when West Indian and West African immigrants were invited to migrate to Britain between 1948 and 1971. “The level of collaboration amongst Chinese churches and local churches is exciting.”

Nam believes that British-born Chinese can serve as a cultural bridge between Hong Kong immigrants and British societal norms.

“British-born Chinese have had time to reflect and think on their hybridity,” he said. “Crossing cultural boundaries is an everyday situation.”

British-born Chinese Christians are likely to seek out perspectives like Nam’s when exploring ways to engender more sustained growth in the Chinese church. Huang is aware of this need, especially when it comes to catechizing immigrant youth and children.

The Teahouse
The Teahouse

In his view, the Chinese church is good at creating a sense of community and shared social capital. But it lacks pastoral resources and often relies heavily on the laity.

“A typical Chinese church is not filled with Christian converts but people who are Christian immigrants,” Huang said. “The Chinese church is not very powerful when it comes to generating new believers.”

The BCCB findings reflect that intercultural ministry is a growing trend, and Christian leaders interviewed say this is happening within Chinese churches and among Chinese and local UK churches.

More than 600 churches have joined the nationwide UKHK program, which equips English-speaking churches with resources to assist and support Hong Kongers, the BCCB study noted. Evangelical groups like Welcome Churches and the UK’s Evangelical Alliance have also been a part of this national effort since it launched last year.

Grace International Church, a Chinese church in Liverpool, now holds services in languages such as Portuguese and Farsi. Youth ministry is also intercultural, Huang adds, as 1.5-generation and second-generation immigrants may find it harder to negotiate their hybrid cultural identities compared to immigrant adults.

Nam has been a strong advocate of strengthening intercultural collaborations inside and outside the church. He founded The Tea House last August, a community focused on cultivating and deepening friendships amongst Chinese-heritage clergy in the Church of England, who represent a mere 0.2 percent of all stipendiary clergy. At a meeting he organized with the Bristol City Council, the Church of England, and Chinese church leaders, one senior pastor of a Chinese church told him that they had never done this before.

This past week, Nam also led a workshop on becoming a “Hong Kong Ready Church.” It featured speakers from non-Christian organization Hongkongers in Britain, local church leaders active in the UKHK initiative, and a pastor from Bristol Chinese Christian Church, the largest Chinese church in the city.

Despite the attention they may be receiving now, these strong social networks between Chinese churches in Britain and Hong Kongers existed long before the BNO visa program was introduced on January 31, 2021, says Chow.

“I know quite a number of Chinese churches that created WhatsApp groups for Hong Kongers who were migrating to the UK well before visas were being issued [to help them find] the best places for schooling and living.”

A “shrinking” window for evangelism?

The window of opportunity to share the gospel is short, suggests the BCCB study, as second-generation British Chinese become less receptive to the faith.

Four out of five non-Christian survey respondents felt that churches and Christians are intolerant of people who have different beliefs and values (79%), while more than half think Christian values are outdated (55%).

“We are in a particular window because migration stirs up questions of being disconnected and lost, and Christianity offers hope during this time,” said Chow.

The other issue lurking in the background when it comes to evangelizing Chinese immigrants: simmering political tensions between mainland Chinese Christians and Hong Kong Christians.

Huang recounts hearing “appalling stories” from three Chinese churches—each in a different city—of these divides, where mainland Chinese Mandarin-speaking and Hong Kong Cantonese-speaking congregants refused to pray for each other or even sit in the same space.

Thankfully, he said, these events occurred in the early stages of his research, and he has heard fewer conflicts occurring as more and more Hong Kong immigrants have arrived.

Still, safety is top of mind for many Hong Kong immigrants. Some Hong Kongers in the UK run away from people who speak Mandarin on the streets, and have installed smartphone apps that inform them about which grocery shops may have links to the CCP, said Chu.

There are “linguistic-cultural-political dimensions” at work in the British context that may hinder a mainland Chinese person from sharing the gospel with a Hong Konger, said Chow.

“The study suggests that mainlanders tend to be a bit more disposed toward a positive view of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), and that may be seen as a deterrent [to Hong Kongers],” said Chow. “While by and large most Chinese Christians in the UK would say they are apolitical, there is a political dimension that is presumed, whether realistic or not.”

Such invisible yet palpable tensions continue to exist within Chinese churches in Britain. Most Chinese churches are comprised of three coexisting congregations that hold services in Mandarin, Cantonese, and English. More recently, says Huang, some churches have been set up exclusively for “Hong Kong exiles.”

What exacerbates these tensions is that talking about political matters remains taboo in many Chinese churches. But Chu hopes that pastors can address the wellbeing of their new Hong Kong congregants.

“Pastors have to deal with the trauma that Hong Kong people have experienced in feeling like their churches and government have abandoned or mistreated them,” Chu said. “To evangelize effectively, we have to talk about the impacts of political tension.”

However, Nam is not convinced that the window of evangelism is so short, chiefly because he does not think that British-born Chinese are less curious about the Bible.

“If anything, as a minority [group], they are very curious. The key is to ask what they are curious about,” he said. “[British-born Chinese] are not interested in expressions of Christianity in Chinese churches.

“I believe it is God and the Holy Spirit that lead people to Christ, not solely humans in their efforts,” said Nam. “To restrict it to a window is awfully short-sighted.

“The question we should be asking is: ‘How should we be teaching and equipping Christians to more effectively engage?’ I refuse to believe there is a timer or a window on the spreading of the gospel. God is bigger than that.”

Theology

What Can Kids Draw from the Chess Cheating Controversy?

As chess champion Magnus Carlsen accuses an American grandmaster, coaches are trying to develop a virtuous love of the game in young players.

Children practice chess at the Dr Henryk Jordan Youth Center in Poland.

Children practice chess at the Dr Henryk Jordan Youth Center in Poland.

Christianity Today October 7, 2022
Omar Marques/Getty Images

A couple of weeks ago, my pastor’s nine-year-old son, who plays chess for fun, asked me what I thought about “Hans.”

He was referring to Hans Niemann, the American 19-year-old chess grandmaster facing cheating allegations.

World chess champion Magnus Carlsen, one of the best players ever, abruptly withdrew last month from a big tournament after he lost to Niemann. Carlsen later put out a statement saying that he believed Niemann had cheated extensively in his career, and that he found their previous game together to be strange. In response Niemann admitted to cheating online when he was 12 years old and in one inconsequential game when he was 16 but has denied cheating in more serious tournaments.

No one can say how Niemann might have cheated. During online chess, players can sneak a look at a chess engine—a tool that shows the best possible moves. Cheating during in-person games is tougher to imagine: Perhaps a player is getting signals from a person in the room, sneaking a look at an engine during a trip to the bathroom, or wearing some kind of buzzer.

The money and status reached in the heights of chess don’t come close to professional sports like soccer or football—why risk your reputation? But the pressure to succeed, and sin while trying, is a human condition. Cheating in chess may be more tempting in a way, because a chess engine can turn anyone into one of the best players in the world. In baseball, a steroid taker or pitch stealer would still have to be really good at baseball.

After more global hubbub than chess has seen in decades, Chess.com (one of the main websites for online tournaments) put out a lengthy report showing that Niemann had likely cheated in more than 100 online games, including in high-level tournaments. One indication of cheating is how closely his games adhere to chess engine moves.

Niemann was still a minor when he allegedly cheated on Chess.com, so the way Chess.com responded to his cheating caught my eye. He’s a professional elite player, but he was also a kid. Included in the extensive report on Niemann (which indicated that others at high levels of chess have also likely cheated online) are Slack messages and emails between Niemann and the leadership of Chess.com, including chief operating officer Danny Rensch.

The report says that Niemann confessed to cheating over the phone in 2020 when Rensch confronted him. Rensch allowed him to start a new account and asked him to email an admission of cheating to the Chess.com team and promise to not cheat again, which Niemann did not do.

When Rensch wrote Niemann this September about that 2020 conversation, according to the report, he said, “I would do that again for you or any young player I deemed to have lost their way and wanted to choose a better path forward.”

A teenage chess cheating scandal illustrates how young people face pressure in all parts of life to cut corners, be bad sports, or plagiarize schoolwork. Parents can implicitly set expectations that “good” children succeed, or they can model the wrong approach to losses or setbacks by overreacting. But that doesn’t mean parents should pull children back from good endeavors.

“There is nothing better for a person than to enjoy their work,” says Ecclesiastes 3:22.

Once I recovered from the shock of my pastor’s nine-year-old knowing about the happenings of elite professional chess, I began thinking: What does it mean for kids to see the best chess players in the world cheating?

In places like Success Academy, a charter school network of about 20,000 students in New York City that includes chess as part of its core curriculum, kids aren’t in the professional chess world, but they do play in high-level tournaments and know Magnus Carlsen’s name. One Success chess team won first place at a national elementary tournament last year.

During the pandemic, Success was able to easily move its chess program online, but children had more temptations to cheat during remote learning, according to Matt Morales, who leads the Success Academy chess program. Morales said he addressed “isolated incidents” of cheating, which he treated as a learning experience. He tells students cheating is not acceptable but also makes it clear that if they do cheat, “we can move forward from this, and it’s not going to define you as a scholar.”

He told CT he emphasizes to students that cheating “takes away from the experience of the joys of the game. The game is mental stimulation and challenging yourself.”

Catholic ethicist Alasdair MacIntyre, in a 1978 essay titled “How to Identify Ethical Principles,” wrote about children playing chess for a candy reward.

If, by cheating at chess, the child can obtain the candy more or as easily than by playing chess well, the child has indeed a good reason for cheating. … But when the child comes to appreciate chess as an activity in and for itself … then the child by cheating merely frustrates him or herself. For the child can only achieve the goods of chess-playing by playing well.

Coaches see opportunities for teaching the value of chess “in and for itself” by the very nature of the game. In chess, not winning is normal. The best players regularly draw and lose games. Coaches see that as an opportunity for kids to focus on playing quality games or appreciating the quality of their opponent’s games rather than focusing on winning or losing. It’s the basics of sportsmanship.

Jay Stallings, an experienced chess coach in California, told me he had plenty of incidents of children taking some “liberties,” as he called it, in games.

When Stallings talks to the kids in his program about cheating, he frames it in terms of how they think about great players. He asks them, “If I tell you that somebody lost the game of chess, would you think that was a person that wasn’t very smart?” They say no, because grandmasters lose games. He tells them that he has lost a lot of games too.

He tells them about a tournament he played where his opponent was outplaying him but then made a big blunder. He was disappointed to see the mistake, “a horrible brushstroke across a Picasso.” After he won the game, he told his opponent that he was completely outplayed until that last mistake. And he tells his students to notice things like that about their games if they win, so they can discuss the quality of the game with their opponent.

One girl was crying after one of his students beat her, he recalled, and he told the student to go tell her something nice like, “You almost beat me” or “That move you played really scared me.” The student went over and said, “Hey, I just wanted to say, you almost scared me.” That made Stallings laugh, but he was proud.

Stallings gives his students chess “passports,” where they could earn stickers for various skills learned. He doesn’t want them to walk into chess club and think only, Am I going to lose every game today? But he also wants his students to have really strong chess skills. If they have the tools to play a good game and lose, he said, “they understand, ‘My opponent played really well.’”

Presbyterian minister Fred Rogers, in his book Mister Rogers Talks to Parents, argues for the importance of love surrounding competitive activities. Kids who are “strong competitors,” he wrote, have a little voice within that says, “It’s all a matter of winning or losing love.” He continued:

There’s probably no way we can keep our children from feeling sad or angry when they lose. … A child may seem to find little comfort in our saying, “But you tried really hard and I’m proud of you.” It takes time to get over a disappointment. For those children who have learned to feel valued and loved by the people they love, these disappointments do pass. [The children] who feel they have to bank everything on their performance come to believe that losing in a competition means being one of life’s unloved ‘losers.’

According to coaches and Mister Rogers, parents should love competitive kids, appreciate their excellence, and help them through disappointment so they don’t feel such a weight of expectation that they start cutting corners. Coaches should help kids learn to win well (showing compassion to opponents) and lose well (appreciating that their opponents played better). Parents and coaches should help kids to love chess, or whatever endeavor they do, for its own sake.

Church Life

Should Hispanic Churches in the US Preserve Spanish in Their Services?

Worship flows in the language of your heart.

Christianity Today October 7, 2022
Nicolas Castro / Lightstock

When Job González was 21, he felt God’s calling to dedicate his life to worship ministry. Raised in a Spanish-speaking family and church in Texas, he thought he would always sing the praises of the Lord in Spanish.

Since 1980, more Christians have spoken Spanish than any other language. Thanks to the growth of the church in Latin America, over 413 million believers have Spanish as their mother tongue today, compared to 250 million with English, according to the World Christian Database.

But Hispanics born in America have continued to prefer English over Spanish for worship. To González’s surprise, he ended up serving at a Hispanic Baptist church that had all its services in English.

In his hometown in Texas’s Rio Grande Valley, “Baptist Temple McAllen is a Hispanic church where the vast majority are Hispanic people who, over the generations, stopped using Spanish,” said González. “When the Lord called me to serve there it was pretty scary, because I had never led worship in English before.”

In Southern states with established Hispanic populations, spanning four or more generations of descendants born in the US, it’s more common to see Hispanic churches like the one in McAllen hold services in English only. Among newer arrivals, congregations stick to Spanish. Other churches offer a spectrum of bilingual, multilingual, and multiethnic worship, either with simultaneous translation or separate English and Spanish services.

Hispanic church leaders differ on whether the church has a role to play in preserving Spanish worship as a distinctive of their culture. Some believe worshiping in Spanish is central to their faith and services, while others believe it’s a secondary factor that should never cause division.

“Spanish is our mother language, and it’s at the core of our roots. Spanish is the second [spoken] language in this country,” said pastor Jorge Ramos. “The truth is that in the foreseeable future there will continue to be immigration of people who only speak Spanish, and if we want to reach them, we have to be here for them.”

Ramos, a native of Cuba, leads a small church in Hickory, North Carolina, that serves mainly first-generation Hispanics. He sees Spanish-only services as part of the mission of Hispanic churches.

Many Spanish-speaking pastors, along with their church members, identify with this calling.

“We have parents at the church that approach us saying, ‘We have children that have to continue to practice Spanish, so please have them take their Bible lessons in Spanish,’” said Sergio Villanueva, campus pastor at an urban megachurch in Chicago.

Villanueva was raised in Torreón, Mexico. After visiting Chicago in the early 1990s, he spent a summer serving at a Hispanic Pentecostal church in the city, where he was offered the opportunity to move to Chicago and take a full-time position in the worship team. But Spanish worship in the States hadn’t taken off at the time—while it was going through a revival in Latin America—so Villanueva didn’t want to stay.

“The Lord had breathed new life on it with all that he did with Marcos Witt and Jesús Adrián Romero in Mexico, Danilo Montero in Costa Rica, Jaime Murrel in Panama, Marcos Vidal in Spain, and many others. It was huge,” he said. “When I came to Chicago, I found out that Spanish worship in America had not experienced that yet.”

When Villanueva went back to Chicago in 1998, he began to imagine bringing that spirit of worship to Hispanic churchgoers there.

“I observed the Hispanic youth in the churches. I observed how they didn’t feel either American or Hispanic; they felt stuck in between, almost in an identity crisis,” said Villanueva. “I also saw how they had not experienced that praise revival we had gone through in Latin America. I dreamed of bringing all that passion to them. The Lord gave me great love and compassion for them.”

Originally founded in 1929, Villanueva’s congregation, Wheaton Bible Church, started offering services in Spanish in 1990, and in 2008 it opened its Spanish-only campus, Iglesia del Pueblo.

Villanueva has seen how Spanish worship has deepened his faith and blessed the church, but he doesn’t believe churches should make it their goal to preserve language or cultural practices.

“After living in America for a while, I was able to observe that the Hispanic church had barricaded itself, on the one side thinking that work was the top priority of their lives, and on the other trying to live in a bubble in order to preserve their language and their culture,” he said. “But that is not the calling of the church; it is not to preserve any language or any culture, but to find ways to impact the culture that surrounds us with the gospel.”

Historically, migrants in general and those who cross the southern border coming from different Central and Latin American countries have been an important mission field within the United States.

Second-generation Hispanics, like the church members at Villanueva’s congregation in Chicago, can struggle to find their own identity while being surrounded by a Hispanic community even though they are American by birth and attend English-speaking schools. But with each generation, Hispanics become less likely to speak Spanish and less likely to see the language as an important part of their Hispanic identity.

“Many parents of Hispanic origin prefer that their children focus on learning English—even those who don't speak English or don’t speak it that well—because they want their children to be absorbed by the American culture,” said González. “Parents care so much about their children's future that they are willing to assume the sacrifice of not being able to communicate with their children in their own language.”

Ever since 2012, González has been leading worship services in English and in Spanish, and he believes the church has to be flexible when it comes to the language.

The church where he serves now, Champion Forest Baptist Church in Houston, offers youth services in English and in Spanish. “We let them choose,” he said. “The truth is that only they know what language connects better with them, and the best we can do as a church is offer them the opportunity to make that choice.”

From 2012 to 2018, González was the Spanish worship leader at Lakewood Church in Houston, serving for a time in partnership with Coalo Zamorano. He began serving there shortly before Marcos Witt stepped down as pastor of the Hispanic portion. Like many megachurches with multiple leaders and services, Lakewood has a clear division between English and Spanish services.

“The language in which a service is led is secondary, it’s not doctrinal. The church has to be flexible and open in this matter, because people can only praise the Lord in the language of their hearts,” González said.

Villanueva believes that, as with other causes of division, it all boils down to going back to the church’s main calling.

“Both striving to be absorbed by American culture and striving to promote the heritage of the Hispanic culture can quickly become idolatry,” he said. “Christians must understand that our culture and our true identity is in Christ, regardless of language and culture. Before being Latino, I am a son of God.

“I believe that passing the Spanish language to the next generations is very valuable, and it is a beautiful thing. But this is a decision that has to be taken at home. It is the parents’ choice and responsibility, not the calling of the church.”

Villanueva cautions parents and church leaders about placing children in Spanish Bible classes and services with the sole purpose of preserving the language.

“The Hispanic church has to be aware that its growth comes mainly from second-generation Hispanics, and for most of them Spanish is not their preferred language,” he said. “If you are in a church where your heart is not being fed spiritually in your own language, you’re never going to grow.”

Even if it’s clear that churches shouldn’t make the preservation of a language their main goal, as long as Hispanics are immigrating to the United States, the need for Spanish church services in America will not fade.

“The Scriptures are filled with migrants. Moses, Joseph, Daniel, Nehemiah. Even Jesus grew up in Egypt and then moved back to Israel,” Villanueva said. “Hispanics in America need to hear that their dual identity and even the struggle with two languages is not a problem, but rather something God is going to use for his glory.”

Ideas

Self-Proclaimed Messiahs and Other Southeast Asian Heresies

CT Staff

Misconceptions about the Trinity and the exclusivity of Christ prevail.

Christianity Today October 6, 2022
Illustration by Mallory Rentsch / Source Images: Aaron Burden / Unsplash

American evangelicals are moving away from orthodox understandings of God and Scripture. This year’s State of Theology survey revealed the top five misconceptions that US evangelicals hold:

  • Jesus isn’t the only way to God.
  • Jesus was created by God.
  • Jesus is not God.
  • The Holy Spirit is not a personal being.
  • Humans aren’t sinful by nature.

CT polled three Christian leaders in the Philippines, Singapore, and Cambodia to find out if these modern heresies are also widespread in their respective regions, how believers can address them, and what heresies may be more common in their contexts.

Timoteo D. Gener, president, FEBIAS College of Bible, Valenzuela, Metro Manila, Philippines

With Catholics making up 80 percent of the Philippines’ population and Protestants, including evangelicals, making up around 10 percent, these five heresies are not common among those who call themselves Christians, especially evangelicals who are part of the Philippine Council of Evangelical Churches (PCEC).

There remains high regard for the authority of the Bible—as well as belief in the Trinity—among these Christ-followers. There are, however, indigenous non-Trinitarian heretical groups like Iglesia Ni Cristo (Church of Christ), Ang Dating Daan (The Old Path), and the more recent “Kingdom of Jesus Christ,” whose pastor-founder Apollo Quiboloy claims that he is the “Appointed Son of God.”

Many years ago, Benigno Beltran’s Christology of the Inarticulate (1987) revealed the prevalence of modalism, the belief that God is a single person who reveals himself in three forms, among folk Catholics. Countering modalism in faith and practice remains a continuing challenge for biblical Christians in the country. It helps that PCEC has a theological commission addressing the challenges of false teachings in the churches.

Modalism seems to be an easy way out among unthinking believers in understanding the mystery of the triune God. Perhaps we need a fresh rethinking of the Trinity from an Asian perspective that looks at the concept through the lens of the family, yet being mindful and cautious not to veer into tritheism.

Soo-Inn Tan, director of Graceworks, a Christian publishing and training ministry, Singapore

Most churches in Singapore are evangelical and/or Pentecostal and so are orthodox in doctrine. I doubt any church would knowingly be guilty of the five heresies except perhaps No. 4: “The Holy Spirit is not a personal being.” Although all will confess that we worship one God, in practice and language we tend to see the three persons as completely separate and the Holy Spirit as more of a force.

Singapore is a very busy society obsessed with productivity, and this approach to life is very much in the church as well. We may hold to all the right doctrines, but we don’t invest the time needed to work through the implications of what we believe for life and discipleship. Followers of Jesus are concerned with running many church programs but are not encouraged to invest time in reflecting on what we believe and therefore how we ought to live.

I believe it is not just a matter of what we teach but how we teach. At Graceworks, we believe that lives and minds are shaped relationally, so Graceworks is committed to promoting spiritual friendship and spiritual mentoring. We also publish books that try to connect the Word with the issues of the day, such as sexual identity, mental illness, and racism. If people see that the Word speaks to current events, they might be more interested in going deeper into theology proper.

Radha Manickam, president, Cambodian Ministries for Christ International, Seattle

Today in Cambodia, people are open to anything religious, and we are seeing more and more cult groups appear and sow confusion among the churches here. This includes cult groups from Korea, China, and the Philippines. In several, the founders claim to be the son of God and say Jesus did not complete the act of salvation. One Cambodian church leader said God was also swayambhu, a Sanskrit term referring to Hindu self-existing gods. He also claimed all Khmer Christians worship the “eldest angel,” as Cambodians often pray to devas, or angels. But the Bible says we don’t worship angels; angels are the servants of God.

I teach several classes where I address this issue and we go back to basic Christian doctrine and see what the Bible says and what it doesn’t say. One thing that we stress is that the Bible says, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God,” (John 1:1) and “The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us.” (v. 14). When Jesus was on the cross, he said, “It is finished.” (John 19:30). Many other verses point to the fact that Jesus is God. No one can claim to be God or the Savior, because salvation is through Christ and Christ alone.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube