"How can any Christian who takes the Bible seriously want to watch (or review) Sex and the City?"
"Anyone who could actually find something redeeming in [Sex and the City] is too awfully familiar with the world."
"Sex and the City is a pornographic film. You should either abandon your stated Christian aims and mission statement, or stop condoning pornography."
"Is this really Christianity Today??? Are you guys really serious about Jesus, the Bible, holiness, and biblical truth?"
And so went some of the letters we received in response to last week's review of Sex and the City.
We totally understand why many people would have no desire to see Sex and the City, choosing to avoid it because of its portrayals of pre- and extra-marital sex and rampant materialism. I myself have no desire to see it, mostly for those reasons.
But to slam us for reviewing the film makes no sense. Our mission statement is to help readers make discerning choices about movies—not to make the choices for people. Our review clearly warned readers of the sinful behavior in the movie, while also noting some of its redeeming factors—like the universal longing for love and companionship, what it means to be a true friend, and more.
But some folks believe that when it comes to a movie like Sex and the City, there should be no choice—they've decided that no one should see it, period … at least no one who calls themselves a Christian. They think we should essentially have a three-word review: "Don't watch it!" But that's not what we're about. We trust our readers to make their own decisions; we won't make those decisions for anyone.
As for why we review movies that depict sinful behavior, it's because such films depict real-world truth, and ...1
Already a CT subscriber? Log in for full digital access.