Judging from the sheer number of stories written, the top religion story during Weblog's hiatus was the "religious war" between Republican presidential candidates George Bush and John McCain. The dispute came to a head when McCain, with Gary Bauer sitting by, criticized Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell as "agents of intolerance." It was phrase in a much longer speech that, among other items, praised James Dobson and Charles Colson. But the "agents of intolerance" line was reported in headlines around the world, and a day later McCain made things worse—much worse—by posing a rhetorical question to a reporter: "You're supposed to tolerate evil in your party in the name of party unity?"
The current issue of Time Magazine has not one but two articles on the largely press-created jihad. If you read one article on the dispute, read Nancy Gibbs's "
Fire and Brimstone." The other article, a sidebar on
McCain's faith, is remarkable because McCain has been largely silent on faith matters until recent days. The New York Times says the remarks have
galvanized undecided politically conservative Christians against McCain. The Washington Post says
he knows it and is trying to erase his mistake. Columnists at The New York Post haven't stopped talking about it. Rod Dreher says the speech has been as
distorted as Dan Quayle's "Murphy Brown" reference, but that Robertson is so
anti-McCain he'd rather see Gore as president. Meanwhile, The Boston Globe looks at the tension between McCain and Bush is a sidenote in a larger Republican battle between
Catholics and evangelicals (there's a
similar article in Time Magazine). It's not a terribly strong case. Expect the controversy to wind up if McCain fares ...
1
You have reached the end of this Article Preview
To continue reading, subscribe now. Subscribers have full digital access.
You have reached the end of this Article Preview
Every week for more than 30 years, he interpreted headlines in light of prophecy.
Our picks for the books most likely to shape evangelical life, thought, and culture.
Churches may someday lose their tax-exempt status. Would that be as bad as it sounds?
