A. L. Barry, president of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod since 1992, died Friday night while vacationing in Orlando. He had entered the hospital February 25 for treatment of pneumonia, but during his stay the 69-year-old minister developed a staph infection and kidney dysfunction, and eventually kidney and liver failure. Obituaries and news articles ran in several major newspapers, and most noted that Barry had raised both the profile of the denomination and his post. "During his years as president, he had enjoyed a higher public profile than many of his predecessors," noted The Washington Post. "He often released his views on society and religion to the secular press." Similarly, the Los Angeles Times wrote, "Barry took an active role in pressing the synod's conservative views in various matters."
But with his death, and vice-president Robert Kuhn's announcement that he will soon retire, the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod stands at something of a crossroads. At least it does in the view of Uwe Siemon-Netto, UPI's religion correspondent and a conservative Lutheran theologian. In an article separate from the UPI's obituary, he reports that the LCMS "has its fair share of internal tensions exacerbating the divisions within American and world Lutheranism on the whole. The sudden death of … Barry last Friday is bound to bring these tensions to the fore, church insiders say. They wonder which of the disparate LCMS wings will prevail in the election of his successor in August."
Siemon-Netto notes several tensions in the church, writing, "The main dividing line in the LCMS runs between the 'confessionalists' and the 'church growth movement,' which has little in common with the elegant way of doing theology that for nearly 500 has been one of Lutheranism's distinguishing marks." Another tension, he says, is between "inclusive" and "exclusive" wings: "The former, who are moderately conservative, wish to reach out to other Lutherans and beyond. The latter, one of whose exponents was President Barry, hesitate to engage in fellowship with other Christians whose doctrinal purity might be questionable." And there are other battles, too. "There is a reason why Martin Luther's spiritual heirs have limited impact worldwide, even though they are the third-largest group of traditional Christian denominations, after the Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox: Lutherans have a reputation for being consummate nitpickers." Why don't you tell us what you really think, Uwe?
Why the battle for religion in the public schools continues
There are plenty of church-state fights being waged in the U.S. right now, but the vast majority of the battlegrounds are in the public school system. But why? In what should have been one of the greatest successes of the Clinton administration, the Department of Education mailed to every school in the country a packet of materials outlining the proper role of religion in the schools. The guidelines were the result of an unprecedented consensus reached by tremendously diverse religious and educational groups (including the National Association of Evangelicals, the Anti-Defamation League, People for the American Way, and the National Education Association).
The guidelines are pretty straightforward. For example: "Subject to applicable State laws, schools have the discretion to dismiss students to off-premises religious instruction, provided that schools do not encourage or discourage participation or penalize those who do not attend." Still, the ACLU is suing a school in Hawaii for exactly this kind of "released time" program.
Similarly, the Department of Education noted, "Students have a right to distribute religious literature to their schoolmates on the same terms as they are permitted to distribute other literature that is unrelated to school curriculum or activities." But in Wisconsin, an 8-year-old girl was forbidden by her teacher from handing out religious Valentine's Day cards and Halloween cards while other children passed out nonreligious cards. (The Liberty Counsel is suing the district.)
A Virginia school board is dragging its feet in addressing a petition of 450 students who want an elective Bible course (taught from a secular perspective). That should be completely uncontroversial, but just for the record, here's the Department of Education again: "Public schools may not provide religious instruction, but they may teach about religion, including the Bible or other scripture: the history of religion, comparative religion, the Bible (or other scripture)-as-literature, and the role of religion in the history of the United States and other countries all are permissible public school subjects. Similarly, it is permissible to consider religious influences on art, music, literature, and social studies." In an even crazier case, public school officials in Wyoming banned students from visiting the "From Tent to Temple" exhibit at the Wyoming State Museum because it has historical references to Jewish beliefs about monotheism and the Ten Commandments.
But not all the offenses are from secularists. A Nebraska public school superintendent tried to justify leading students in prayer at a school assembly by saying it was voluntary. But the Department of Education guidelines are clear that "Teachers and school administrators, when acting in those capacities, are representatives of the state and are prohibited by the establishment clause from soliciting or encouraging religious activity, and from participating in such activity with students. Teachers and administrators also are prohibited from discouraging activity because of its religious content, and from soliciting or encouraging antireligious activity."
So what is going on here? Why aren't clear, publicized guidelines being followed? An article in Education Week may have the answer: a survey found that "39 percent of administrators and 69 percent of teachers were 'not at all familiar' with the guidelines on religious expression in schools distributed by the Clinton administration in 2000." Apparently so. Not only aren't they familiar with the guidelines, they're not familiar with the principles underlying them: "About six in 10 teachers and administrators did not think students should be allowed to distribute religious materials at schools." As a result of the findings, the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and the First Amendment Center are teaming up on a multiyear project to educate the educators and make First Amendment freedoms more common in public schools. In the meantime, the controversies continue. More are listed below. If you're like Weblog, you'll need a break after all these exasperating stories: here's a baby rhino cam to cool you down.
More on religion and public education:
- Kansas school district bars ministers from visiting students during school hours | Superintendent says meetings had 'too much mixing of religion going on instead of support. (Freedom Forum)
- North Dakota Senate affirms right to religious speech in school | Bill says schools may not regulate religious speech any more strictly than they do secular speech (Associated Press/Freedom Forum)
- Mississippi governor vows to sign 'In God We Trust' bill | ACLU will sue over mandatory display of motto in schools (Associated Press/Freedom Forum)
- Also: 'In God We Trust' law stirs controversy | American Family Association is making 32,000 plaques available (CNN)
- Milwaukee will vouch for vouchers | Parochial, private schools draw pupils—and questions about success (The Washington Post)
- Making courtesy common | As school violence puts spotlight on values, one San Gabriel campus reflects a growing push to teach civility along with academics. (Los Angeles Times)
Other church-state issues:
- Bill to put God on Tennessee state flag offends atheist | "You'd think I was trying to put an obscenity on the flag," says Democratic sponsor (The Tennessean, Nashville)
- ACLU sues to remove cross from Mojave National Preserve | Group says religious symbol has no place on public land, but park officials say bill passed by Congress bars using federal funds to remove it. (Associated Press/Freedom Forum)
- 'Read the Bible' billboard causes controversy in Cleveland | Suggestion from city councilman breeds church-state questions (WEWS)
- High court limits right to spiritual aid at executions | Upholding a rule that prisons say is needed to protect the identities of executioners, state justices restrict the presence of inmates' religious advisors. (Los Angeles Times)
- Christian Scientists reverse stance | Church says it will support faith-healing bill if "medical care" is replaced with "proper health care" (The Denver Post)
- Keep HB 1286 as written (Editorial, The Denver Post)
- Illinois State House passes hate-crimes measure | But worries remain that legitimate religious figures might be held criminally responsible for the actions of their flocks. (Chicago Sun-Times)
- Hold that conscience | Some health laws would force churches to betray their beliefs (John Leo, U.S. News & World Report)
Religion and politics:
- Church draws fire for allowing Clinton to speak at fundraiser | And Jubilee's apology has upset organizers of quake-relief event (San Jose Mercury News)
- Beware of religious links, PM is warned | As Blair considers appropriating some of Bush's faith-based initiative, he faces opposition from his party (The Guardian, London)
- Blair warned over wooing 'religious' | "This is an agnostic nation," says Former Labour deputy leader Lord Hattersley (BBC)
- British bishops accused of party politics in 'life' crusade | The Archbishop of Westminster insisted that he was not endorsing any particular party by emphasising "life" issues, but he appeared to be encouraging Catholics to vote Conservative. (The Times, London)
- Fury over cardinal's voting advice | Electorate told to question candidates on abortion stance (The Guardian, London)
- South Africa's Education Minister in hot water over religion remarks (Daily Dispatch, South Africa) (See also Business Dayand The Independent)
- Group urges U.S. aid for Africa | Bread for the World requests an additional $1 billion a year in aid and debt relief for sub-Sahara African countries (Associated Press)
- N.C. feels lottery pressure | North Carolina, the only state on the East Coast without a lottery or plans for one, is facing increasing pressure to get in the game, but a coalition of conservative Christians and liberal Democrats have beaten lottery bills over the past two decades (Associated Press).
- National Council of Churches urges end to Vieques bombing | Puerto Rican island's 9,400 residents scheduled to decide in a November referendum whether U.S. Navy should stay or leave (Associated Press)
Bush's faith-based initative:
- Faith in action | Some religious social groups proselytize, but others say they're merely motivated to help (The Dallas Morning News)
- A clerical, and racial, gap over federal help (The New York Times)
- Holy War | On one side are conservative evangelicals who fear Bush's program will lead to the regulation of faith-based groups. On the other are black churches eager for money to perform social work in the inner city—whether or not it comes with strings attached. (The New Republic)
- Most welfare plans pass on charity (Associated Press)
- Most states pass on charitable choice (Associated Press)
Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.
See our past Weblog updates: