Theology

The Wondrous Cross: Our Playlist

Music to accompany CT’s 2022 Lent & Easter special issue.

Christianity Today January 31, 2022
Abigail Erickson, Cass Roberts

Each article in The Wondrous Cross reflects on a piece of music as a way to delve deeper into the meaning of Christ’s suffering, death, and resurrection. These songs of the Cross gives form and voice to the resounding response of our souls. They express the Good News that reverberates even in the darkest moments of Jesus’ passion—and in the darkest moments of our own lives.

You can listen to each song mentioned in the special issue on our Spotify playlist:

  Alternately, you can listen to the songs via the following YouTube videos:

“O Sacred Head Now Wounded” is featured in the introduction by Kelli B. Trujillo.

    “When I Survey the Wondrous Cross” is featured in “The Cross Is the Great Revealer” by Jay Y. Kim. Here’s a choral version as well as a version by Sandra McCracken:

    “And Can It Be That I Should Gain” is featured in “’Tis Mystery All” by J. Todd Billings.

    “Ah, Holy Jesus, How Have You Offended” is featured in “Love Unswerving” by Fernando Ortega.

    “There Is a Fountain Filled with Blood” is featured in “Our Bloody Plunging” by Rachel Gilson. Here’s Willie Nelson’s recording as well as an instrumental rendition of the song:

    “Were You There” is featured in “Weighing Our Answers” by Patricia Raybon.

    Lux Aeterna is featured in “In Grief, Our Consolation” by Makoto Fujimura.

    “Christ the Lord Is Risen Today” is featured in “Love’s Redeeming Work Is Done” by Jen Wilkin. Here’s a choral version as well as an acoustic rendition of the song:

    “Ain’t No Grave” is featured in “The Resurrection to Come” by Carolyn Arends. Below are four versions of the song that are discussed in the article, from Brother Claude Ely, Bozie Sturdivant, Sister Rosetta Tharpe, and Johnny Cash.

We asked several additional Christian leaders and musicians to share some of their favorite songs of Easter. You’ll find their nominations below:

Three contributors to this resource—Jay Y. Kim, Fernando Ortega, and Carolyn Arends—discuss the stories behind their devotional reflections in this webinar from Renovaré in partnership with CT.

Theology

Announcing the Winners of Christianity Today’s First International Essay Contest

Wisdom, perspective, and theological understanding from Spanish, Portuguese, French, and Indonesian writers.

Christianity Today January 31, 2022
Illustration by Christianity Today / Source Images: Yannick Pulver Hop / Adolfo Felix / Unsplash

In 2021, we published more than 800 translations of Christianity Today articles into Spanish, Portuguese, French, Chinese (simplified and traditional), Indonesian, Korean, and Russian. We’re excited that so many of our essays and news stories have resonated with readers around the world. As we open 2022, we’re delighted to be sharing pieces originally written in Portuguese, Spanish, French, and Indonesian with our English readers.

Last year, we announced a contest for those who write in these languages and received more than 100 submissions. These essays were meticulously reviewed by our language editorial teams and then assessed anonymously by a team of judges. A big thank you to these judges for their time and thoughtfulness. And thank you to everyone who submitted an essay for deeply engaging your faith and the world.

We’re currently entering our third year of building out CT Global’s language ministries. If you’re interested in assisting us in growing this work, here’s where you can learn more about our translation and social media roles.

Any feedback you’d like to share with us, please send here. Thank you for reading!

—Morgan Lee Global media manager

Indonesian

Editorial director: Maria Fennita, Indonesia

Judges:

  • Casthelia Kartika: president of Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Amanat Agung (Great Commission Theological Seminary), Jakarta
  • Jimmy Setiawan: founder of WOW (Wonders Of Worship) Ministry, Jakarta
  • Wahyu Pramudya: lead pastor of Gereja Kristen Indonesia Ngagel (Indonesian Christian Church Ngagel), Surabaya, and founder of ributrukun.net

French

Editorial director: Léo Lehmann, Belgium

Judges:

  • Maxime Pierre-Pierre, Haiti: pastor, teacher, Séminaire de Théologie Évangélique de Port-au-Prince (Evangelical Theological Seminary of Port-au Prince)
  • Alphonse Teyabe, Cameroon: PhD, pastor, researcher, and communications consultant
  • Marie-Noëlle Yoder, Switzerland: pastor, teacher, and director of French-speaking department, Centre de Formation du Bienenberg (Bienenberg Training Center)

Portuguese

Editorial director: Marisa Lopes, Brazil Project coordinator: Mariana Albuquerque, Brazil

Judges:

  • Aldair Queiroz, Brazil: pastor of Igreja Missão Paixão e Compaixão (Passion and Compassion Mission Church), master of theology degree
  • Rômulo Monteiro, Brazil: pastor of Primeira Igreja Batista de Aquiraz (First Baptist Church of Aquiraz), director of Instituto de Teologia Semear (Semear Institute of Theology), theologian and writer
  • Tiago Rossi, Brazil: postgraduate work in theology, PhD in international relations/Kuyperian political thinking
  • Carlos Marques, Brazil: pastor of Igreja Batista (Baptist Church), theologian, and podcaster

Spanish

Editorial director: Livia Giselle Seidel, Mexico/United States Project coordinator: Sofía Castillo, Argentina Judges:

  • Luis Fajardo, Spain: general director of Sociedad Bíblica (Bible Society of Spain), elder at the Asamblea de Hermanos in Valladolid, and professor of biblical Hebrew
  • Harold Segura, Colombia: pastor, theologian, and director of World Vision's Faith and Development Department for Latin America and the Caribbean
  • Gonzalo Chacón, Costa Rica: pastor, missionary to indigenous peoples of Central America, and invited professor at Escuela de Estudios Pastorales ESEPA (Pastoral Studies School)
  • Noa Alarcón, Spain: writer and translator specializing in theology and biblical studies, student of Hispanic and Hebrew philology
  • Óscar Fernández, Panama/El Salvador/Costa Rica: theologian and doctoral candidate in socioreligious studies, coordinator for Latin America and the Caribbean of Global Proclamation Academies (Academias de Proclamación Global), member of the board of directors at RREACH (Ramesh Richard Evangelism and Church Health) ministry

Domestic Violence Harms Thousands of Brazilian Women. Is the Church Making It Worse?

Despite their good intentions, pastors and church leaders aren’t helping victims find safety.

Christianity Today January 31, 2022
Illustration by Rick Szuecs / Source images: Anna Shvets / Pexels / Wikimedia Commons

You’re reading the English translation of the winner of Christianity Today’s first ever essay contest for Christians who write in Portuguese. Learn more about the competition and CT’s multilingual work and check out the winning essays written originally in French, Indonesian, and Spanish.

The character of a church is revealed by how it treats its most vulnerable members. The poor, exiles, widows, and orphans constitute, according to American philosopher Nicholas Wolterstorff, the “quartet of the vulnerable.” It would not be an exaggeration to include among these widows the Brazilian victims of domestic violence, invisible women who have been crying out for help, but whose cries still finds little resonance.

An overview

Brazil is a dangerous place for women. In 2018, every two hours, a woman was murdered. Every two minutes, a woman was beaten, and every day, an average of 180 women became victims of rape. These statistics place the country among the world’s champions in aggression against women, according to the Anuário Brasileiro de Segurança Pública (Brazilian Public Safety Yearbook). Worse yet, these numbers are underreported, since, according to the yearbook, only 40 percent of victims register these crimes.

While general indicators of violence in Brazil have improved over the past decade, violent deaths among women have increased by 4.2 percent between 2008 and 2018, according to the 2020 Atlas of Violence. Other survey — carried out by Datafolha between December 5th and 6th, 2019 — shows that Brazilian evangelical churches are composed mostly (59%) of poor, black women. This group, who make up the majority of those in the pews of Brazilian evangelical churches, were the hardest hit: The homicide rate among black women increased 12.4 percent in the period, while falling 11.7 percent among non-black women, also according to the Atlas of Violence. While 54 percent of the Brazilian population is black, a 2021 survey from the IBGE (the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics), indicates that the average earnings of a black or brown person is less than two-thirds of that of the white community, contributing to this population’s vulnerability.

Violence in the home

Behind these grim numbers are a significant number of female evangelical victims. Researcher Valéria Vilhena interviewed many domestic violence survivors for her master’s thesis, which eventually became a book: Uma igreja sem voz: análise de gênero da violência doméstica entre mulheres evangélicas (A Voiceless Church: A gender analysis of domestic violence among evangelical women). The interviews revealed that 40 percent were evangelical. Her research analyzed the reports of women who visited a domestic violence support center in the south zone of São Paulo, Brazil’s largest city. The study went viral, becoming a reference work on the subject.

Vilhena’s research reveals that churches and their leaders have inadvertently helped to perpetuate this tragic scenario. As they turn to their local pastor for advice and support, hoping to escape physical and psychological abuse, many women invariably receive the same sermon: “Sister, you must pray more, fast, cry out to God for the conversion of your husband.” They quote 1 Peter 3:1–2: “Wives, in the same way submit yourselves to your own husbands so that, if any of them do not believe the word, they may be won over without words by the behavior of their wives, when they see the purity and reverence of your lives.”

This attitude, which seeks to treat a criminal issue with spiritual tools, adds fuel to the fire of violence against Brazilian evangelical women. Taking this approach, many pastors, albeit unknowingly, have contributed to the perpetuation of domestic violence in Christian homes, resulting, in some extreme cases, in the murder of the women involved. Few understand the negative impact and consequences that their theology has for survivors.

Thus, our sisters in the faith are victimized twice: first by the violence at home and second through a legalistic reading of the Scriptures, which keeps them imprisoned, waiting only on God for deliverance, when help could come from their pastors.

In my research for the book O grito de Eva (Eve’s Cry), I interviewed some of these suffering women, coming into contact for the first time with a universe filled with pain and resentment. Many had their young lives destroyed by the ruthless men with whom they lived, some of whom had even been empowered by church leaders.

A complex and challenging issue

“Why do these women stay and submit to this?” I asked myself many times after these interviews. Looking for an answer, I sought out psychologists with experience in assisting evangelical Christians, such as Jungian analyst Dora Eli Martin Freitas. These women often reproduce family patterns and come from a context of violence in the home, she says:

In some cases, it was a cruel and domineering mother; in others, an authoritarian or alcoholic and oppressive father. The child either learns to strike with the same weapons with which she was struck, becoming evil and even perverse, or becomes passive and fearful. Men who beat their wives also have these same backgrounds.

The submissive behavior of the mother toward the father, or the opposite, can traumatize the children, who become either very aggressive or excessively passive. These more passive women, who are not allowed to express their desires, are prone to somatization, whether it is recurring migraines or cancer. They cannot live an authentic life, and neither can they transgress, so they end up betraying themselves. Transgressing, in a Jungian sense, as Martin Freitas explains, is the failure to fulfill the expectations of others with regard to oneself. It is when a person sees the standard they have been subjected to and has the courage to say: “I am not, and I will not be, that person.” It is having the audacity to break with that expectation.

In addition to these psychological barriers, economic dependency is another important reason why victims remain silent. Fear of their partners is the greatest reason why women fail to report their partners, according to a DataSenado Institute’s national survey of 2,400 women. The second is lack of financial autonomy.

Submission

As Christians, we are all called to manifest a willingness to serve and submit to others out of reverence to Christ (Eph. 5:21).This convocation applies to marital relationships as well. The challenge is to prevent the obedience to this principle from turning us into victims in an unbalanced relationship, in which one spouse dominates the other.

After this general principle, the text in Ephesians 5 goes on to describe in detail what it expects from the specific dynamics of the marital relationship. “Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord.” (v. 22). It adds right after, “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her” (v. 25).The text states that the woman’s submission must correspond to the husband’s sacrificial love for her. Thus, according to the biblical concept of submission, the woman should not submit to a husband’s violence, but should submit to his love.

Psychology can also help us to better understand the biblical concept of submission. “I understand,” says Martin Freitas, “that serving the other is not subjecting yourself to the power of the other. It is about demonstrating the availability to help the other, regardless of who this other is. It is not subjecting oneself to the role that the other represents. Many times, husband and wife are just pre-established roles, full of stereotypes, and to fulfill these roles, people need to become ‘personas,’ that is, actors, distancing themselves from their deeper selves. To transgress, in this case, is to say—I don't accept living as an actor.”

In Martin Freitas’s view, many pastors only reinforce these female stereotypes, limiting women to the little boxes of religion or even culture. Their attitudes are reminiscent of the German saying, which reserves for women the three Ks: Kinder, Küche und Kirche: children, kitchen, and church.

Attorney Priscila Diacov has contributed a legal point of view to the biblical understanding of the concept of submission. She works as a mediator of family conflicts in São Paulo and shares information with churches. In her seminars, she teaches about the different forms of abuse and shows that the attitudes of evangelical women, compared to nonevangelical women, are related to the teaching of submission to the husband at any cost; the obligation to forgive the partner for his violent acts; the feeling of guilt for damaging his reputation within the community, should she denounce him; and the fear of being judged for going against the Word of God. “They also feel guilty for not praying enough for their spouse to change his behavior, and if they seek a divorce, they feel responsible for destroying the family,” Diacov said.

Based on this misconceived notion of submission, pastors and leaders often help form a mentality in men and women that is distorted and difficult to change. But little progress can be made without confronting these convictions and bringing their distortions of Scripture to light. In the view of Daniela Grelin, director of the Avon Institute, a philanthropic organization with programs combating violence against women: “At the core of Judeo-Christian culture is the idea of the dignity of the human being, male and female, created in the image and likeness of God. This is the standard that must be taught.”

The challenge of change

Violence against women is not just a women’s problem; it is a problem for all areas of society: families, churches, companies, and the government. We can all play a role in raising awareness in our areas of influence. According to Grelin, just as we cannot allow only black people fight for the end of racism, or leave only Jews to fight antisemitism, so it is not possible to relegate the defense of this cause only to women. “It is necessary to engage men in this transformation.”

Welcoming victims of aggression within the churches depends on a strong commitment from leadership. “It is a complex job, requiring the participation of all, and it depends on the training of pastors and church leaders,” says Diacov.

Unfortunately, however, the issue of domestic violence by Christian men is not on pastors’ agendas. They simply ignore this reality or place the responsibility on women to deal with the problem. Many are unaware of the different forms of abuse and are poorly informed about gender and child violence.

With the support of volunteers and members in the areas of mental health, the law, or social work, pastors and other leaders of the local church could set up small safe spaces for listening to, receiving, and welcoming these women. “It is important that these women are listened to, welcomed and that they receive adequate guidance to save their lives and their dignity,” Diacov adds.

But the aggressors also need help. Mature, capable men can form conversation groups focused on listening and mentoring, as many aggressors bring deep emotional wounds as a result of abuse they themselves suffered in childhood.

Unfortunately, domestic violence is a very serious and widespread social problem, a challenge for both the less developed countries in Latin America as well as the wealthier countries in the Northern Hemisphere. In a country like Brazil, in which unemployment, poverty, and inequality have gotten worse during the pandemic, violence against evangelical women is yet another item on a challenging social agenda.

The church of Christ, in its manifold wisdom and discernment, does have the moral strength and content to reduce these terrible indicators, becoming part of the solution instead of part of the problem. At the end of the day, we have all received, through Christ, the ministry of reconciliation (2 Cor. 5:18). But for this to happen, it is essential that the teaching dealing with the submission of women be proper and call not only wives to have an attitude of loving companionship and respect for their husbands, but also on husbands to love their wives as Christ loved the church and sacrificed himself for it.

Marília de Camargo Cesar was born in São Paulo, is married, and has two daughters. A journalist, she is assistant editor of special projects at Valor Econômico, the largest economic and business newspaper in Brazil. She is also the author of books that provoke reflection among evangelical leaders. Her best known works are Feridos em nome de Deus (Wounded in the Name of God), Marina — a vida por uma causa (Marina: A Life for a Cause), and Entre a cruz e o arco-íris (Between the Cross and the Rainbow).

Translation by Paul Brian Connolly

An Indonesian Family Drama Helped Me See God’s Sovereignty in the Pandemic

Watching characters struggle amid tragedy has given me clarity about Christ’s character during life’s painful moments.

Christianity Today January 30, 2022
Illustration by Rick Szuecs / Source images: Hendriyan David / Unsplash / Rudi Suardi / Xijian / Getty

You’re reading the English translation of the winner of Christianity Today’s first ever essay contest for Christians who write in Indonesian. Learn more about the competition and CT’s multilingual work and check out the winning essays written originally in Portuguese, French, and Spanish.

The feature film Nanti Kita Cerita tentang Hari Ini (One Day We’ll Talk About Today) is one of a number of quality Indonesian films that have recently caught my attention. (Caution: spoilers ahead.) The film tells a simple yet touching story of a family: a father, mother, and their three children, Angkasa, Aurora, and Awan. The father is overprotective of Awan, the youngest child in the family. He demands that Angkasa, the eldest, take care of her and put aside his own interests. At the same time, Aurora, the middle child, sometimes feels neglected and ignored by her father.

The plot reaches its climax when it is revealed that Awan had a twin who passed away. It becomes apparent that this is why the father has been so overprotective. Having just learned about this, Angkasa explodes at his father. This family, which had seemed so harmonious, splits up. The mother, who has stayed largely in the background, begins to speak up in an effort to reunite the family. The father then works to make peace with himself and his family, learning how he might divide his attention equally among his three children. The film ends with everyone coming together.

I saw this film two months before the first cases of COVID-19 were detected in Indonesia and kept returning to it after we entered lockdown. Each character’s individual response to tragedy helped me empathize with the variety of ways I saw people coping with the pandemic around the world. Further, the film helped me realize that these reactions could become a story to tell in the future, whether as silly distractions for our grandchildren or cautionary tales for our community.

The Bible is filled with stories of people experiencing God in their lives in both good and bad ways. If we look at our lives as followers of God who are trying to understand Him, we will find that our stories are just some of the many that He has given us as living testimonies.

Taking inspiration from One Day We’ll Talk About Today, here is the first draft of what I imagine I’ll one day be telling others once the pandemic is over.

“Life is funny. The things we look for disappear … the things we chase after run away from us … the things we wait for go away. And just when we get tired and give up, that’s when the universe works. Some things appear as expected, some much better than planned. The Creator is very kind.” —Awan

Here, Awan expresses her feelings for a character named Kale. Awan wrongly thinks that Kale wants something more than friendship because he has been paying attention to her. However, when Awan confronts Kale to see what their status is, he turns her down.

In life, most of us have experienced the loss of something we had hoped for. I experienced it when I lost my father. I should confess that before he passed, I was not a child who felt much for her father. You could even say that I was the most rebellious member of my family and had turned my back on him. Everything I had done until that point had been in reaction against him, including my wanting to go to seminary. However, once I was in seminary, God allowed me to see and understand the many ways I had gone wrong. When I made my peace with my father and restored our relationship, God soon called him back home to heaven, regardless of how much I needed him.

My father's passing brought about deep feelings of sadness. However, I have no regrets because God was the one who brought about our reconciliation. There are no longer any problems between me and my father. Understanding this made me believe even more in the beauty of God’s design. With this knowledge, I was able to get through this time of loss with an open heart.

Over the course of the pandemic, I’ve seen many people have their expectations dashed in other ways: people who were extra careful contracting COVID-19 and others who didn’t believe the virus even existed coming to believe in it only once they’d contracted it. It seems as though the more we’ve tried to avoid the virus, the more rampant it’s become. It’s even mutated multiple times, rendering once-effective lines of defense null.

It’s interesting that something so small, invisible to the naked eye, has proven more powerful than any one person in terms of changing the times we live in. It is through this invisible virus we can witness firsthand the helplessness of humanity in the face of the almighty power of God. Beyond anything that has occurred, the Creator has remained sovereign. Even though He is invisible, He is at work in our lives and makes use of everything according to His plan. What C. S. Lewis said in The Problem of Pain remains true: suffering is God’s megaphone; it makes us realize His importance in our lives.

We have experienced a large number of losses throughout 2020 and 2021: sudden death of loved ones and acquaintances, loss of work, reductions in income, the boredom of having to stay at home, among many other things. We still don’t know when this pandemic will end. We are without clarity or certainty.

On the other hand, life is filled with a diverse array of possibilities, especially when it comes to religion. Christians have not been the only ones to experience this. Prior to the pandemic, all religious activities tended to occur indoors at houses of worship. However, now, as a result of lockdown measures, we have had to learn to worship from home. There is currently no need to gather in a sacred place. The meaning of house of worship has changed. The pandemic has altered how we worship.

In the end, everything that happens on earth can seem like it’s part of a joke. What we hope for inevitably ends differently than what we expected. We can make plans and choose whether we want to be in line with God’s will or not. But in the end, God is sovereign, and we are reminded to accept it—whether we want to or not—with full openness, as Job rebuked his wife: “Shall we accept good from God, and not trouble?” (Job 2:10).

However, if interpreted correctly, a loss can show God’s inclusion and care, no matter how much we may suffer in the moment. This can take a number of forms: comfort from unexpected people, new opportunities for business, job offers from old friends, or opportunities to serve others who are also suffering. The suffering that comes from a loss can also help give us a greater appreciation for life and help us live in a more honest way. Time is precious, and there are no do-overs.

“Sadness sometimes takes us to a higher ground. The points on a compass can’t be controlled, but the direction of a sail can be.” —Kale

Kale says this to help comfort Awan.

We can’t reject the suffering or problems that come our way. Nevertheless, God has given us the ability to overcome these things. Whether our lives are miserable or filled with joy, what matters is how we react to the things that happen. As I discovered when I grieved the loss of my father, an event may be initially sad at first, but we may later find acceptance or even happiness. God can also provide what we need during a difficult situation, so that we can still be grateful even in the midst of our difficulties, as my mother and I experienced.

Two days before my father passed away, my mother saw her older sister laid to rest. As resilient as my mother is, I knew that these two events occurring one right after the other would be a struggle for her. However, I know now that God had designs for me to accompany her in her grief. As a result of the pandemic, it was possible for me to continue my studies online while being physically present for my mother as our whole family mourned. Despite my family's pain, I nevertheless bore witness to God's sovereignty and provision.

“Do you think life is like a button that you can keep pressing when you’re sad and suddenly you become happy again?” —Aurora

The eldest daughter’s words bring to mind the challenge of instantaneously turning sadness into happiness. Everything takes time: processing a loss, wiping away tears, healing from wounds, and even starting to feel happy again.

In the story of Job, three of his friends, Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar, sit with him for seven days and nights (Job 2:11–13). Once the seven days pass, each friend begins to give Job advice. This is where a problem occurs: Job no longer feels comfort from his friends but instead the stress of his predicament. Job’s suffering has not ended, his wounds have not healed, his grief has not passed, and his friends have now burdened him with the complexity of his situation.

In all the suffering that we currently face, the most important thing is that we can still be grateful for the process. God is a lover of process. He appreciates how we try to process everything and make sense of our suffering. Impatience and fault finding only create new problems or make existing problems worse.

“There’s always a first time for everything, including failure.” —Angkasa

In this scene, Awan’s brother, Angkasa, tries to comfort her after she has just been fired from her job.

Failure, suffering, and struggle are all a part of life. When we face them, God want us not to give up but to try and rise again, to not be hopeless, to hold on to the hope that we have. Hope makes us resilient in the face of failure and suffering. It keeps us from sulking. Hope also makes us thankful that we still have the opportunity to enjoy life, even if it’s just for a few minutes. Perhaps in those few minutes, we can say goodbye to someone we love, tell others how thankful we are for them, or just let them know that we love them.

However, what’s most important is the basis for our love: Jesus Christ. Because of him, we can feel safe and still have hope in the midst of suffering. “For God did not appoint us to suffer wrath but to receive salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ. He died for us so that, whether we are awake or asleep, we may live together with him” (1 Thess. 5:9–10).

“And so, when will you be happy?” —Lika

Angkasa’s girlfriend, Lika, challenges him because she is troubled by how he always prioritizes his family over himself.

How would we respond if someone were to ask us this question? As Christians, our answer might be found in our ability to appreciate every small thing, no matter how simple, that comes to us while we’re alive: family, friendship, studies, even the opportunity to make a mistake and try to make amends. I have learned to appreciate the little things in life. I long to one day talk about what I’ve been through and say, “God is good.” In this way, I’ll be able to testify that “in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose” (Rom. 8:28).

Vika Rahelia is a designer who takes inspiration from being an “imperfect seminarian” at the Indonesian Reformed Theological Seminary in South Jakarta, Indonesia. She likes to visualize her words through graphic design, hand lettering, and T-shirt prints. You can follow her on Instagram at @imperfectseminarian.

Translated by Adam Mele

Additional translation work by Jim Swartzentruber

News

Brian Houston Steps Aside as Hillsong Global Senior Pastor

Founder takes leave of absence for 2022 in order to prepare for trial on charges that he concealed alleged child abuse by his father.

Senior pastors Brian and Bobbie Houston in prayer at Hillsong Church.

Senior pastors Brian and Bobbie Houston in prayer at Hillsong Church.

Christianity Today January 29, 2022
Courtesy of Hillsong Church

In this series

Brian Houston, cofounder of the Hillsong megachurch and media empire, announced he is stepping aside as global senior pastor, telling worshipers via a prerecorded video played during the Sunday morning service at Hillsong’s Sydney, Australia, headquarters that he would be taking a leave of absence from the church until the end of this year.

Citing a decision by the Hillsong board and external legal counsel, Houston, standing with his wife and cofounder, Bobbie, said “best practice” dictates that he absent himself completely from church leadership as he faces trial for allegedly failing to report sexual abuse. The court proceedings, he said, are “likely to be drawn out and take up most of 2022.”

“It’s been an unexpected season, and we are thankful for you all and for the community we share,” Houston said on the video streamed toward the end of the service. “I never get tired of the praise reports and miracles, especially those committing to Jesus.”

Houston’s leave of absence comes after more than a year of scandals that rocked the church both in Australia and abroad and amid Houston’s own legal troubles at home. Houston stepped down from the board of Hillsong in September.

“The result is that the Hillsong Global Board feel it is in my and the church’s best interest for this to happen, so I have agreed to step aside from all ministry responsibilities until the end of the year,” Houston said in the January 30 video announcement.

Houston, 67, was charged in August with concealing a serious indictable offense of another person. Police say his late father, Frank Houston, also a preacher, indecently assaulted a young male in 1970. Court documents allege Houston knew of his father’s abuse as early as 1999 and “without reasonable excuse,” failed to disclose that information to police.

Frank Houston died in 2004 at age 82.

His lawyers told the court in October that Houston would plead not guilty, but his trial has been delayed multiple times, according to Perth Now.

Brian and Bobbie Houston in a screenshot of a Jan. 30 video announcing his extended leave of absence from leadership of Hillsong, the global megachurch the couple founded.
Brian and Bobbie Houston in a screenshot of a Jan. 30 video announcing his extended leave of absence from leadership of Hillsong, the global megachurch the couple founded.

In his statement to the church Sunday, Houston said the allegations came as a “shock.” He said he plans to “fight the charge and welcome the opportunity to set the record straight,” and he needs “to be fully committed to preparation and engagement with the case.”

The board is supportive, Houston said, and they “have talked about the effects of the situation with my father, which go back many years up to the current legal case, and the impact this has had on me emotionally.”

As CT and The Associated Press noted in October:

Hillsong Church has said repeatedly that it has not been involved in this matter, as Frank Houston never worked for the church, and has defended Brian Houston’s response.

“Upon being told of his father’s actions, Brian Houston confronted his father, reported the matter to the National Executive Assemblies of God in Australia, relayed the matter to the governing board of Sydney Christian Life Centre, and subsequently made a public announcement to the church. Brian sought to honor the victim’s multiple requests not to inform the police,” the church said in a statement in July.

“As a recent development, charges have officially been filed against Brian Houston,” the church said at the time. “We are disappointed that Pastor Brian has been charged, and ask that he be afforded the presumption of innocence and due process as is his right. He has advised us that he will defend this and looks forward to clearing his name.”

Phil and Lucinda Dooley, the lead pastors of Hillsong Church Cape Town, will step in as the interim global senior pastors, according to Houston. His wife, Bobbie, will remain “fully engaged in church life,” and her leadership positions, he said.

“It is 50 years this week since I commenced Bible college in New Zealand, so with five decades of active ministry behind us, be assured we will make the best of this season to replenish spiritually, emotionally and physically,” Houston said.

Houston, a New Zealand native, founded Hillsong Church with Bobbie in 1983 in the suburbs of Sydney. An evangelical church affiliated with the Pentecostal network of Australian Christian Churches, Hillsong now boasts 30 locations around the world—and launched an Atlanta campus in June 2021—with an average global attendance of 150,000 weekly. Two Hillsong College campuses, in Sydney and Phoenix, Arizona, offer “biblical training” and “ministry experience.”

The church’s growth was, in part, spurred by its wildly popular worship bands and their music, now nearly ubiquitous in churches around the world. Hillsong became its own denomination in 2018.

Ideas

Gov. DeSantis, Let My Ministry Serve Migrant Kids

In preventing care for unaccompanied minors, Florida’s governor is interfering with US law and religious freedoms.

Christianity Today January 28, 2022
Brynn Anderson / AP Images / Joe Raedle / Staff / Getty

In December, Florida governor Ron DeSantis issued an “emergency rule” blocking the issuance and renewal of state licenses for organizations that serve unaccompanied migrant children, including many faith-based organizations.

Recently, Floridian evangelical pastors joined other religious leaders and laypeople in urging the governor to reconsider this decision, which both puts vulnerable children at risk and impinges on the religious liberty of Floridians.

Governor DeSantis’s stated rationale for the order is focused on preventing the resettlement of “illegal aliens” to the state, but the reality is that the unaccompanied migrant children at the center of this debate are being treated precisely how US law requires.

The William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act is a law that President Bush signed after significant advocacy from evangelical leaders in 2008.

It states that when the Border Patrol identifies a child from a noncontiguous country seeking protection at the US-Mexico border without a parent or legal guardian, the patrol is to transfer the child to the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to ensure the child is kept safe.

From there, HHS works with a network of childcare providers—which are required to be licensed by the state to ensure they meet appropriate standards. These providers care for the kids until a sponsor is identified, which is usually the child’s mother or father who already lives in the US, or another relative.

The child is eventually required to report to an immigration court to determine whether he or she lawfully qualifies to stay in the US.

Christians may agree or disagree with whether this is the best process for responding to these uniquely vulnerable kids, but it is the law of the land—and the federal government is not doing anything illegal or nefarious by complying with its mandates.

Faith-based organizations like Bethany Christian Services, Lutheran Services, and ministries of the Catholic Church have agreed to partner with the federal government to provide care for these children. In many cases, that includes Christian foster parents who partner with them by opening their homes to help the kids.

In doing so, such Christian individuals and organizations are being faithful to the Biblical command to care for foreigners who reside among us (Lev. 19:34).

Pro-life Christians who believe that every human life is made in God’s image (Gen. 1:27)—and therefore possess inherent dignity and worth—have a clear direct scriptural directive to ensure that such children are protected from harm. Jesus reserved some of his harshest words of judgment for those who would cause children to stumble (Matt. 18:6).

In fact, is a very practical application of the Golden Rule to care for someone else’s child the way I would want a brother or sister in Christ to care for my child if he or she ended up stranded alone in a foreign country (Matt. 7:12).

That’s why Gov. DeSantis’s policy presents a startling threat to religious freedom.

By withdrawing a required state license, foster parents cannot care for unaccompanied children and ministries cannot operate a temporary shelter while they search for the child’s family. Therefore this new policy actively blocks Christians (and those of other religions) from exercising their freedom of faith.

After all, religious liberty is more than just the right to worship in a church building on Sunday. It is the freedom to follow and obey all the tenets of one’s religion, including caring for vulnerable children.

Gov. DeSantis also said that the policy is designed to prioritize the care of Floridian children. But he knows very well that the unaccompanied migrant program is fully paid for by federal (not state) funds—and therefore does not divert from the care of local children in need of foster care.

In fact, many of the organizations that partner with the federal government to care for migrant children also partner with the state of Florida to care for domestic children in need. Which means that withdrawing these licenses could end up harming many vulnerable US citizen children as well.

The governor’s decision is part of a troubling national trend of politicians one-upping one another to demonstrate how heavy-handed they can be toward particular immigrant populations. It apparently banks on the assumption that doing so is more politically salient than standing up for religious freedom and the dignified care of children.

What’s particularly troubling to me as an evangelical Christian is when such politicians seem to think these kinds of measures will appeal to a voter base that is largely composed of fellow evangelicals.

In this case, I hope Governor DeSantis’s political calculations are proven wrong—and that evangelicals in Florida and beyond will speak up forcefully against his recent actions.

Whatever their views on immigration policy more generally, American Christians should agree that innocent children waiting for a decision on their immigration case should be protected during their stay in our country.

Moreover, no government should interfere with the ministries and individuals who are obeying a biblical mandate by providing compassionate care for vulnerable kids.

Matthew Soerens is the US Director of Church Mobilization and Advocacy for World Relief, the national coordinator of the Evangelical Immigration Table, and coauthor of Welcoming the Stranger: Justice, Compassion and Truth in the Immigration Debate and the forthcoming Inalienable: How Marginalized Kingdom Voices Can Help Save the American Church.

Speaking Out is Christianity Today’s guest opinion column and (unlike an editorial) does not necessarily represent the opinion of the publication.

News
Wire Story

Ukrainian Seminary Leader: Russian Invasion Could Send Baptist Churches Underground

Baptists in western Ukraine prepare to open their homes and churches if brethren have to flee the eastern border.

Christianity Today January 28, 2022
Chris McGrath / Getty Images

Baptists in western Ukraine have made plans to shelter fellow believers in the case of a Russian invasion at the eastern border, a Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary graduate who now leads a Baptist seminary in Ukraine told Baptist Press.

“If Russia will invade, they will invade in eastern part and northern part, and a little bit of south,” said Yarsolav “Slavik” Pyzh, president of Ukrainian Baptist Theological Seminary (UBTS) in Lviv who holds a doctorate from Southwestern.

“Churches already agreed,” Pyzh said. “Those that are on the western part of Ukraine … told our brothers and sisters in other parts of Ukraine [that] if something happens we will open our homes and our churches to you.”

Russia persecutes religious minorities, including evangelical Protestants, through restrictions such as the 2016 Yarovaya Law criminalizing evangelism outside church walls. Russia considers any church beyond the government-influenced Russian Orthodox Church to be sectarian or a cult.

Pyzh believes Russian victory in Ukraine would more than likely lead to Ukraine being split into two countries, with western Ukraine remaining independent. Baptist churches that would fall to Russian rule as a consequence would likely transition to spread the gospel underground, Pyzh said, rather than abandon the faith.

“The church will go underground,” he said. “You have to understand that historically we had that experience before under the Soviet Union. So the church did not forget what does it mean to be persecuted, and I think that we will rearrange, reorganize, and still do what we always do, still preach the gospel.”

About 400 of the 1,300 students enrolled at UBTS are from eastern Ukraine, Pyzh said. The seminary has already helped Christian missionaries safely navigate the region during the current threat of violence.

“I think here in the West we would have the opportunity to train more students, to train more people, facilitate some help and support them in any possible way,” he said, “because I don’t believe that [Russian President Vladimir] Putin will come here.”

Malcolm Yarnell, who taught Pyzh at Southwestern more than a decade ago, has asked Southern Baptists to pray for Christians in both Ukraine and Russia.

“I would pray first of all for peace and justice between the two nations,” said Yarnell, research professor of theology. “I think that’s important for us to pray for, because we want human beings to be respected and to be treated with human dignity. And in wartime, if war were to happen, human dignity seems to go out the window.”

He described his second prayer request, “for the witness of the churches,” as closer to his heart.

“Both Russian Baptists and Ukrainian Baptists believe firmly in religious liberty,” Yarnell said. “They are respectful towards the state, but … they see themselves as coming under the Lordship of Jesus Christ, and they want to serve Christ and they want to witness for Christ.

“Like Baptists in so many places, they have a strong legacy of asking for religious liberty, and this is true of all of the Baptists there.”

Pyzh encouraged churches in the US to reach out to any Christians and churches in Ukraine with whom they’ve already established relationships, to earnestly pray for Ukrainian Baptists and to find ways to provide humanitarian relief in the event of armed conflict.

“I think if US churches will renew their connections with Ukrainian churches, with Ukrainian entities, and ensure that ‘yes, we are with you, yes, we are praying for you, yes, we are ready to step in and help, in case you need that help,’” Pyzh said, “that would be a tremendous encouragement for our people, that they are not alone in that.”

The evangelical church in the US is in a better position than the evangelical church in Europe, Pyzh said.

“You have to understand, the evangelical church in Europe is not that strong,” he said. “But the evangelical church and Baptist church in particular in the United States are a lot stronger.”

About 2,000 churches are members of the Ukrainian Baptist Union, comprising about 100,000 believers. UBTS, located about 1,000 miles west of the Ukrainian-Russian border, has graduates serving in 230 Ukrainian churches, Pyzh said.

It’s unclear how humanitarian aid would be delivered in the event of war, he said, but pointed to such groups as the American Red Cross.

News

Died: Robert Shine Sr., Black Baptist Leader in Philadelphia

The pastor was “not a kingmaker” but called Christians to see social issues as God testing the church.

Christianity Today January 28, 2022
Courtesy of the Shine family / edits by Rick Szuecs

A conservative commentator on Fox News once dismissed Robert Shine Sr. and the impact of the group of Black Christian clergy he led in Philadelphia with a wave of his hand.

“They’re not kingmakers,” he said. “They probably lose more than they win.”

But that wasn’t how Shine measured the ministers’ witness. That wasn’t how he understood the job.

“We represent the kingdom of God,” he told a Philadelphia newspaper in 2002. “We are the voice calling for conscience, appealing to do the right thing.”

Shine, who spoke out for “the least and the last and the lost” for more than 40 years, pastored a Black Baptist church in the East Germantown neighborhood for more than 30, and taught pastors and deacons at a Bible institute for more than 20, died at home on January 4. He was 82.

“He was truly a man of God who loved doing what God called him to do, and that was pastoring, teaching and working for social justice,” Michael W. Couch, a fellow pastor, told The Philadelphia Inquirer.

Shine was born on August 4, 1939. His parents, Benjamin and Estelle Shine, raised him and his 15 siblings in Germantown, the historic Philadelphia neighborhood that gave birth to the American antislavery movement.

He knew early on that he wanted to be a preacher. At 8, he climbed up on a milk crate on a street corner and delivered his first sermon. He was baptized at a Baptist church at 11 and ordained a deacon at 20.

After high school, Shine took classes at La Salle University’s business college and worked as an evangelist with a group he helped organization called Christians United Reaching Everyone.

Shine earned a degree from Manna Bible Institute in 1971. The unaccredited Bible college describes itself as offering an education “built on the full authority of the Bible as the written Word of God and dedicated to God’s glory.” It was founded to serve people who couldn’t afford a formal seminary education. Many classes were offered at night for working students seeking a “Christian worker” or “standard Bible” degree.

Shine was ordained after graduation and immediately began pastoring a local Baptist church. The congregation couldn’t pay enough for him to provide for his young family, though, so the 31-year-old pastor took a second job as a janitor, first at Prudential Life Insurance and then at Merck Pharmaceuticals.

It was at the multinational pharmaceutical company—mopping floors, cleaning toilets, and emptying trash—that the bivocational pastor started turning his attention to social justice issues. He and 12 other employees joined together and sued the company for racial discrimination, alleging it gave preferential treatment to white people in hiring and promotion. In 1976, Merk settled the suit, committing $3.2 million to a fund for minority training.

A few years later, the AIDS epidemic changed how Shine thought about social problems. When the first few cases were diagnosed in the city in 1981, he thought the disease was God’s punishment for gay men.

He looked at how God sent 10 plagues to Egypt and leaned on Amos 3:6: “Shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it?” (KJV). Then, looking more closely, he became convinced that one key reason God sends evil to a city is to challenge his people. Shine was convicted that AIDS was sent to test the church, and the church was failing.

“Evil … tends never to recede until the church draws its sword,” Shine wrote in The Philadelphia Daily News. “If the church could be more compassionate and less judgmental, we the church would be far more helpful in reaching those whose souls are perishing from this evil. As the Apostle James writes, ‘Mercy triumphs over judgement’ (James 2:13). And surely mercy suits this cause.”

In 1996, Shine became the chair of social action committee of the Black Clergy of Philadelphia & Vicinity. In that role, he became a leading voice on social justice issues in Philadelphia, speaking out against racism, police violence, state-sponsored gambling, and violence against Asian Americans.

Regardless of the issue, Shine maintained that social problems were an opportunity for churches and ministers to stand up and speak with moral authority. The root cause of many problems, he said, was silence from the church.

“The reason racism has continued so long,” he said in 2000, protesting police brutality against a Black suspect, “is that certain pulpits have been quiet too long.”

Shine was elected president of the Black Clergy of Philadelphia in 2001. He also served with the Philadelphia Martin Luther King Jr. Association for Non-Violence and the Pennsylvania Statewide Coalition of Black Clergy.

However much time Shine spent on social activism, he continued to focus on strengthening the church. One way was his ministry at Manna Bible Institute, where he taught and served as chair of the board as the school went through a difficult time.

Manna was forced out of its five-building campus in the 1990s because of plumbing and heating problems. The school moved three times and then had its building go up in flames when a group of teenagers set it on fire. (Manna officials intervened with a local judge not to send the boys to prison but instead arrange a plan of mentorship and restitution.)

The institute moved nine more times before finding a home in North Philadelphia in 2011. Shine said the leadership of the school believed it was important Manna remain in the city “to provide that additional opportunity to strengthen our churches and leaders at a cost that is affordable.” At the time, at least 100 pastors in Philadelphia had been trained at Manna.

Shine also pastored Berachah Baptist Church from its founding in 1985 to the summer of 2021. He preached a final one-hour sermon the day before he died. He told his congregation about his cancer treatment and preached on Christ’s incarnation and the final judgement.

“Some of us have the mindset we can do whatever we want to do and call it ‘Christian.’ But if it’s not doing the will of God, then it becomes self-will,” Shine said. “Whatever you have left undone, your record is on high now. You can’t reach it. You can’t amend it. You can’t send any notice to the secretary of heaven. … The record is sealed and will be sealed until the day the Lord comes and the book will be open.”

Shine is survived by his wife, Barbara Ann Wayns, and children Robert P. Shine Jr., Randall Shine, Robin Shine Maddox, Rhonda McKinney.

News

Grand Canyon University Sells $1.2 Billion Debt

Arizona school aims to continue expanding campus and increasing in-person enrollments.

Christianity Today January 28, 2022
Grand Canyon University / Google Maps

Three years and five months after transitioning to nonprofit status, Grand Canyon University (GCU) has successfully sold off $1.2 billion of debt. The milestone marks a major step in a very unusual journey for a Christian school.

One of the nation’s largest Christian universities, GCU was founded as a nonprofit in 1949 but turned into a for-profit entity in 2004 during a period of financial distress. After a decade of increasing its earnings and enrollment, the university returned to nonprofit status. The debt sale, finalized in December, completes GCU’s transition and positions the university for its next phase of growth, GCU president Brian Mueller told CT.

“It was not an easy process, but it ended up being an exhilarating one,” he said. “It’s been described as the largest real-estate-related financing in the state of Arizona history, and so it wasn’t without its complexity; it took some time.”

As a for-profit college, GCU was able to invest $1.6 billion into its academic infrastructure over the last decade, according to Mueller, without significant tuition increases. GCU renovated and expanded its campus, building new classrooms, 25 dorms, a recreation center, and a 7,000-seat arena.

With the money from the junk bond sale, GCU will refinance the remaining debt on a $875 million loan it took out in 2018 as part of the arrangement to separate from Grand Canyon Education (GCE), which remains a for-profit institution. That loan, due in 2025, allowed GCU to buy its assets from GCE.

GCU will also continue freezing on-campus tuition costs and work to grow enrollment, Mueller said. In 2008, the school had around 1,000 on-campus students. Today it has about 23,000—with another 90,000 enrolled online—but hopes to increase in-person enrollment to 40,000.

The path to those numbers is not well trod.

“GCU is something of a unicorn in the Christian higher ed world,” said John Hawthorne, a retired sociology professor and Christian university administrator who has watched the developments unfold. “Not just the for-profit piece, but the size of their online program relative to their on-campus program I think exceeds Liberty’s (leading to arguments about which one is ‘the largest Christian University’). One thing I have noticed is that GCU has leveraged their online success into building a robust campus experience, something the original for-profit folks weren’t interested in.”

Investors who looked at buying the school’s debt also noticed it was different than other universities. The corporate-bond market has seen large deals from name-brand Ivy League schools, but not rapidly growing evangelical colleges, and the size of the sale is extraordinary.

John Augustine, who managed the sale for Barclays, said GCU generated interest from about 30 investors.

“The university now joins a very select group of not-for-profit and public universities who have successfully closed a bond offering of this magnitude,” he said in a statement. “Grand Canyon University’s mission to make private, Christian education affordable and accessible to high achieving students, regardless of economic status, was received well by investors.”

The school was a standout success story in the for-profit industry, CT previously reported, avoiding industry pitfalls such as high loan defaults, maxed-out federal funding, and failure of the federal gainful-employment regulation that can lead to the bad reputation of such for-profit schools.

Now, as a nonprofit, GCU’s bond issue “is unprecedented,” Bloomberg reported in December, despite a Ba1 rating by Moody’s Investors Service, which is one step below investment grade.

Higher-ed issuers sold about $4 billion of corporate debt in 2021, Bloomberg reported, slightly higher than the $3.6 billion per-year average since 2010. Last year’s offerings included the top-rated Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Howard University, rated one step above junk.

GCU’s large sale comes as returns on junk-rated corporate and municipal debt outpace the broader national bond market. Still, the bonds have a stable outlook, Moody’s said, with the university benefiting particularly from its online education niche.

The school doesn’t plan to sell debt again, Mueller said, even with so much intended growth and investment in academic infrastructure on the horizon. Over the next four years, the school plans to invest $500 million to expand the campus further.

For Mueller, all of this serves one core goal: making Christian higher education more affordable.

He’s grateful there were people in the market for junk bonds who could get behind that vision.

“That they were extremely excited about our mission as an institution, our commitment to making private Christian higher education affordable to all socioeconomic classes of Americans, our commitment to rebuilding the inner-city neighborhood that we’re in,” Mueller said. “Those were all things—in addition to the basic and fundamental financial model—that they wanted to get behind.”

Theology

Jerry Falwell Jr. Isn’t a Hypocrite

But the former Liberty president is a cautionary tale for cultural Christianity.

Christianity Today January 27, 2022
Carolyn Kaster / AP Images

This piece was adapted from Russell Moore’s newsletter. Subscribe here.

Over the past week, countless friends texted me a Vanity Fair profile of former Liberty University chancellor Jerry Falwell Jr., featuring an extended interview with the man who went from being a kingmaker in the 2016 presidential election to resigning after a series of scandals.

What most people highlighted was not the salacious recounting of the stories but one particular quote from Falwell: “Because of my last name, people think I’m a religious person. But I’m not. My goal was to make them realize I’m not my dad.”

For some, this shows the problem: hypocrisy. If only it were.

When I say that Jerry Falwell Jr. is no hypocrite, I mean it in only one sense. Obviously, Falwell was hypocritical in, among other things, allegedly engaging in behavior that, for even the smallest of the offenses, would have led to fines or expulsions for his students.

In that sense, the scandal is similar to the revelations that British prime minister Boris Johnson attended Downing Street cocktail parties while the public was forbidden by law to gather due to COVID-19 public health measures. And, of course, beyond that is the much more fundamental matter: How can the chancellor of one of the world’s largest Christian universities justify his behavior by saying he’s not religious?

That’s precisely the point, though. Hypocrisy is an ongoing and always-present danger in the church. Jesus warned us to beware of hypocrisy—charging the religious leaders of his day with maintaining piety out of pretense.

For Jesus, the congruence between the inner and the outer—the heart and the mouth, the motivations and the behavior, the public and the private—is a crucial matter of integrity before God. The warnings were needed, Jesus told us, because hypocrisy is, by definition, crafty and hidden. Wolves look like lambs, which is why they are able to ravage the flock.

For such hypocrisy, Jesus used the metaphor of yeast (Luke 12:1)—a metaphor he also used for the kingdom of God (13:20–21). In other words, both hypocrisy and the kingdom work powerfully but invisibly, under the surface of perception. Only in the very long term are such hidden realities brought to light (12:2).

Hypocrisy typically leaves people vulnerable to deception and predation precisely because it is so carefully hidden. I often find churches or ministries unable to discover horrific things done in their ministries because they assume that evildoers in the church give off a creepy vibe or have a supervillain’s sinister laugh.

The most dangerous hypocrites, though, are those who are actually skilled at hypocrisy—at pretense, at hiding, at mirroring the look of true fidelity.

Yet Jerry Falwell Jr. told us repeatedly how he saw the world. When confronted with the immorality and scandals of his preferred presidential candidate, Falwell didn’t seek to measure the moral deficiencies against what he saw as the greater good as much as he ridiculed the premise of the question.

To him, Trump was moral because he had created jobs and made payroll. Unlike some other Trump evangelical supporters—with whom I disagreed but whose positions were reasonable and understandable—Falwell didn’t try to measure the business leader’s intemperate and crass attacks on people with some other objective, like judicial nominations, for instance. Instead he often mimicked such attacks, right along with the cartoonish and bullying tone of them.

Falwell Jr. frequently spoke not in terms of the gospel or the way of Christ, even parenthetically, but in terms of decidedly Machiavellian political aims and objectives. When individuals questioned the cost to Christian witness of merging evangelicalism with populist demagoguery, he often dismissed them as though they were morally preening puritans, out of touch with the real world.

When his own scandals started to proliferate, Falwell did not defend himself as a faithful follower of Jesus Christ. He didn’t even (as do so many scandal-ridden Christian leaders) present himself as a repentant David in the middle of Psalm 51.

Falwell said that he was a lawyer, not a preacher—as though the commands to integrity, obedience, repentance, and mercy were ordination vows, not the call of Jesus on every one of his disciples and, even before that, written by God on the consciences of every human being.

In many ways, Jerry Falwell Jr. did not hide from us who he was. He told us, over and over again.

If the problem were his hypocrisy, we could blame him. We could absolve ourselves of responsibility. After all, how could we know? We knew enough to know that something was wrong here. When some of the details of the final days of the Falwell Jr. era were revealed, lots of people said, “How could he be this stupid and self-destructive?” But I don’t think many said, “How could this happen? He was such a godly man.”

That is a crisis of accountability, yes. If we cannot see the problems even when a leader is telling us (at least the roots of) them outright, how can we expect to keep watch for leaders who actually are skilled at mimicking discipleship and sanctification?

But this is also a crisis of love. As evangelical Christians, it is a scandal that we didn’t hold Jerry Falwell Jr. accountable for all the vulnerable people who suffered because of his decisions. And yet it’s more than that: It’s a tragedy that we did not love Jerry Falwell Jr. enough.

My reaction to some Christian scandals—the Ravi Zacharias revelations, for instance—is a kind of simmering anger at the leader. In the case of the Vanity Fair profile, though, I fail to see how anyone can read it and not come away with at least some compassion for Falwell.

When asked whether he was seeking to self-destruct, he said, “It’s almost like I didn’t have a choice.” And then he disclosed, repeatedly, how he identified with the wilder side of his family—the atheists and bootleggers—rather than with what he seems to consider the puritanical piety of his mother.

In this, he does not appear to be a prodigal son, rebelling against his father, as much as a son who loved his father and who counts him as being on his side. He and his father understood each other, he said. They shared an irreverent sense of humor and a knack for institution building.

While Falwell Sr. was building a Religious Right empire, the younger Falwell’s description of his role is telling: “I’d be the kid in the back of the auditorium selling my dad’s books and records to people while he preached. I would have all this money stuffed into every pocket. That was my life.”

Indeed it was. And, later, when the university his father built was in financial trouble, Falwell Jr. was tapped to help lead them out of it. In the article, he discloses how his father affirmed and admired his business savvy. And he was successful at that.

As chancellor, Falwell Jr. built Liberty’s enrollment, campus, and financial reserves into a powerhouse. Even to the end while someone else was preaching, he was right there, selling.

In some ways, the Jerry Falwell Jr. story is emblematic of the state of American cultural Christianity. If, as the old saying goes, hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue, then the older form of American cultural Christianity was genuine hypocrisy.

Some people belonged to churches so they would be seen as good people. Even if they never believed, they sang the hymns and prayed the prayers and played on the church softball teams. The adulterer would pontificate on family values, and the embezzler would teach Sunday school classes on the Ten Commandments.

In time, as always happens, politicians sought to make this kind of religion a political force—a moral majority—that could de-emphasize the less popular aspects of Christianity (Trinity, incarnation, blood atonement, carrying a cross) and emphasize the more marketable aspects (fighting for the soul of America, reclaiming the culture, saving Western civilization).

Now, though, cultural Christianity seems to have evolved to the state where many people don’t even have to pretend to belong to churches. They just need to know how to post Facebook memes about Christian values right along with profane slogans about the president of the United States.

And behind all of that, are real people—created in the image of God, destined for an eternity of glory or damnation. The consequences aren’t just societal or even just theological. They are strikingly and tragically personal.

Is it possible that Jerry Falwell Jr. could never see himself as anything but someone who had to succeed, who was trapped into leading a family business bound up in a religion he didn’t really embrace? I don’t know.

I do know that when a man tells us he was in such a desperate, self-destructive place for so long, we owe it to him—and to ourselves—to ask, “Were we so deceived that we couldn’t help him? Or did we turn our attention away as long as he was succeeding?”

If the latter, the problem isn’t Jerry Falwell Jr.’s hypocrisy. The problem is us.

Russell Moore leads the Public Theology Project at Christianity Today.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube