The Iran-contra scandal has demonstrated once again the strength of one aspect of America’s constitutional government that is perhaps most congruent with biblical revelation: The Constitution’s careful system of checks and balances indicates its profound suspicion of the accumulation of power by fallible human beings, however decent they may be.

Similarly, biblical narrative is unflinching in its depiction of power’s potential to mislead even the best of leaders—consider Kings Saul, David, and Solomon, all shown in their shame as well as in their glory. Biblically understood, sin is pervasive, and all persons are subject to self-deception. Jesus said men prefer darkness to the light. And Paul, in Romans 1, called attention to the human inertia toward proud illusion rather than humble reality.

In a democracy, popularity and power are synonymous, and Ronald Reagan has been nothing if not popular. The “Reagan magic” and “Teflon presidency” are results of Mr. Reagan’s popularity. Polls showed nearly 70 percent of the population has approved of his presidency.

And even in late December, when journalists and politicos inside Washington’s Beltway were very near hysteria over the Iran-contra debacle, a majority of Americans continued to regard Ronald Reagan as a basically decent and trustworthy man.

Ironically, there is evidence that the Iran-contra affair unfolded largely due to the power that popularity afforded members of the Reagan administration. Lt. Col. Oliver North’s activism on behalf of the contras was raising eyebrows as early as 1984 (he was then soliciting funds from private American sources). But congressional investigation of North ended when it garnered ...

Subscriber access only You have reached the end of this Article Preview

To continue reading, subscribe now. Subscribers have full digital access.

Have something to add about this? See something we missed? Share your feedback here.

Our digital archives are a work in progress. Let us know if corrections need to be made.

Tags:
Issue: