The evangelical movement is notoriously difficult to define and nearly impossible to harness. Sweeney, associate professor of church history at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, advocates history as a way to promote consensus and tolerance. In his brief survey, he begins with the 18th-century Great Awakening and ends with observations on how mainstream evangelicalism incorporated charismatic practices, such as "praise songs."
Sweeney worries the movement will fragment along secondary theological lines. He prods some Calvinists for caring more about their theological distinctives than about evangelical cooperation. He chides evangelicals for not building enduring institutions, and for neglecting black and Pentecostal believers.
Sweeney lauds Mark Noll for recounting the evangelical impact on politics, science, and culture. Perhaps this is why Sweeney reserves only a footnote for significant political developments from the last 25 years.
Sweeney charges his readers—mostly seminary and college students—to fill a looming leadership void: "The founding neoevangelical leaders are passing away.
The question remains whether others will arise to take their place, finding a way to choreograph this massive, motley Christian movement without requiring its members (futilely) to march in single file."
As many of us learned of Jarrid Wilson’s suicide, I’m reminded that pastors (and Christians) are not immune, and being honest about that is good for all of us.
As many of us learned of Jarrid Wilson’s suicide, I’m reminded that pastors (and Christians) are not immune, and being honest about that is good for all of us.
When the path to formal church leadership is blocked, they'll naturally look for other ways to reach an audience.
Two new books push back on Chicken-Little narratives of evangelical decline.
In the ministry’s first major innovation in seven decades, the children now do the choosing.
