January 22 marks a grim anniversary: 25 years since Roe v. Wade
legalized abortion. A generation has passed since the first wave of unborn
children fell, and the accumulation of each year's toll totals nearly 37
million. During those years one child was aborted for approximately every
three born. Their names would fill the Vietnam Veterans' Memorial wall over
700 times.
Abortion has been a disaster, first for the children who died and second
for those who survived to grieve a lost child, grandchild, or sibling. It
has damaged us all. How can we even measure the spiritual cost levied on
a country that pronounces the killing of its own children a celebrated right?
It is tempting to avoid thinking about it, and when we do think of it, it
is tempting to stew in helpless fury.
Avoidance and fury—neither response has pushed us forward. As a movement,
the pro-life cause has stopped. We are stuck, mired, at an impasse. We have
had small gains and small losses, but the bottom line is the same: 1.5 million
abortions a year. I suggest we use this morbid anniversary as an opportunity
to reassess our strategy.
BECOMING LISTENERS
The pro-life movement has succeeded in keeping people uncomfortable with
abortion but not in translating discomfort into a firm will to oppose it.
That is why I have adopted the unconventional approach of listening
more carefully to the objections to our cause.
I have a personal interest in conversation between the opposing sides: I
myself have championed both positions. Back in my college days I was your
basic bad-tempered, male-bashing, hairy-legged women's libber, actively
pro-abortion. Abortion, I believed, was essential to liberation. Women would
not be able to enjoy the same success as their male counterparts ...
1
You have reached the end of this Article Preview
To continue reading, subscribe now. Subscribers have full digital access.
You have reached the end of this Article Preview
Faithful responses to the Supreme Court decision should involve new care practices.español
Escaping Russian missiles, some exiled believers found a new sense of purpose helping refugees.
Supreme Court: The landmark abortion-rights case was “egregiously wrong and on a collision course with the Constitution from the day it was decided.”español
Supporting unborn children requires more than government, but not less.
