Between evangelicals' passion for adoption and other changing family dynamics, we probably all know someone who has been part of a particular difficult conversation: the man known for years as Dad is not, in fact, the biological father.
Those conversations are often full of grace and love and can end in greater intimacy. But they're also usually fraught with pain and difficult questions: What does this mean? Where do I come from? Who am I?
The recent reshaping of the creation-evolution debate is causing similar discomfort for those of us who emphasize the authority and infallibility of Scripture. Scientists in genomic demography and other fields—as well as their Christian popularizers in groups like the BioLogos Foundation—are essentially sitting us down to have "the talk": Adam, the man you've called your father all these years, isn't who you think he is, they explain.
Few debates in our world have been as impassioned and emotional as those over creation. But now we're not just talking about dating rocks and interpreting fossils. We're talking about family. Nor is the discussion between those who think the Bible's account of creation, fall, and redemption is important and those who find it irrelevant. This is a family meeting.
That is one of the reasons we're covering the discussion multiple times in this issue. First, we wanted our cover story to be the most straightforward, non-partisan report on the de-bate possible. Richard Ostling was our immediate pick. Christianity Today's news editor in the 1960s, Ostling went on to spend nearly three decades with Time magazine and another with the Associated Press. He is universally acclaimed as one of the top religion journalists of our age. We were thrilled when he said ...1
Already a CT subscriber? Log in for full digital access.