Home Improvement Meets the Gospel
Austin, Texas—with its "Keep Austin Weird" motto emblazoned on locals' t-shirts and bumper stickers—is ground zero for a green-building revolution, due in no small part to nearby University of Texas, hipster culture, and a booming technology startup scene. The self-proclaimed "live music capitol of the world" will also be the second U.S. city to get Google Fiber, an Internet-cable plan that Google promises to be 100 times faster than today's standard broadband.
The culturally liberal enclave in a vast red state might not be the first city that comes to mind when you imagine the future of Christianity. But when you're trying to figure out what God is up to, "weird" is a good place to look. And maybe the weirdest thing about Austin is not the Google Fiber streaming in its front door, but rather the treehouse in its backyard.
Just off of U.S. highway 290 in South Austin sits TreeHouse, a home improvement supply store for "smart building and better living," specializing in environmentally conscious installations that save energy.
Since opening in 2011 and seeing $3 million in sales so far, TreeHouse is one indicator that providing homeowners with more energy-efficient and sustainable products may be a business model as economical as it is ecological.
TreeHouse began in 2007 in Frisco, Colorado, as Evan Loomis and Jason Ballard, two of the original five co-founders of TreeHouse, found themselves sitting in a micro-brewery instead of skiing, hatching a plan to create the Whole Foods of Home Depot.
Loomis and Ballard had been looking for something like TreeHouse ever since their days at Texas A&M University, when they became close friends in the Aggie's Men's Club, sort of a purpose-driven frat house.
"Some of us are doctors, some have gone on to formal ministry, but we all shared this conviction that we didn't want to waste our life," says Ballard.
After graduation, Ballard took his biology degree and worked in sustainable buildings, while Loomis took his finance degree to Wall Street. But in Colorado, they stumbled upon an idea that married their experience and passions to a great need.
Ballard believes the way Americans currently build and maintain their homes uses too many natural resources and is detrimental to our health. Loomis was simply jazzed about the numbers.
"From a business standpoint, it was an incredible idea," said Loomis. "Apparel had Patagonia. Grocery had Whole Foods. But home improvement was pretty bland. No one was doing anything meaningful for health and sustainability."
The foundation of the TreeHouse business model is extending "Common Grace for Common Good." Ballard, an Anglican (Loomis calls himself "Anglican friendly"), is confronted by the obligation expressed throughout the Anglican liturgy to reach out to the surrounding community.
"If you are praying out the liturgy, the idea of the common good is always there. It haunts you," he says.
Planting Deep Roots
If the TreeHouse mission statement, the "Roots" document, reads a bit like a manifesto, that's because it functions as one. Each of the document's tenets was prayerfully developed to reflect a core element of the gospel, and then is ordered by importance.
The first tenet, People Matter, is a message at the heart of the biblical narrative. Next, that care must radiate to communities and, after that, nature. Only with these three in place can TreeHouse hope to accomplish the fourth element: a commitment to deliver products and services that are truly excellent, that do not harm in the process of helping.
Finally, Dreams Matter. "It comes at the end for a reason," said Ballard. Dreams, of all the pieces of the Roots document, points to living in the hope of the return of Christ.
Loomis and Ballard recite a little axiom to remember their mission. It's a simple string of verbs that sounds like a conjugation exercise: was, is, ought-to-be, and will-be, a way of rehearsing the biblical narrative.
Living out that storyline is what for Ballard and Loomis makes TreeHouse deeply Christian. "If the Resurrection is true, it should influence how we live and behave toward everything," says Ballard.
Loomis and Ballard compare their approach to faith-informed business with other approaches by alluding to C. S. Lewis and J. R. R. Tolkien: Both authors approached their work with deep Christian motives, but Lewis crafted an explicitly Christian allegory in the Chronicles of Narnia, whereas Tolkien wrote the Lord of the Rings as a non-allegorical work yet one still pervaded by Christlike characters and themes.
Loomis and Ballard have even adopted a Tolkein-esque nickname for one of their mentors, Steven Garber, founder of the Washington Institute for Faith, Vocation & Culture. "If you want to engage the arts of culture or anything, he's your Gandalf."
Garber has consulted with Fortune 500 companies, but says the principles of biblical stewardship and sustainability apply just at well to anyone opening a hamburger joint. In fact, the former chairman of the Washington Institute, Hans Hess, did just that with Elevation Burger in 2005.
"Hans is making eschatological hamburgers," says Garber. Everything from the way the cattle are raised to the quality of the ingredients to the way Hess treats his staff points to the way life under Christ's reign ought to be. Garber likewise challenged TreeHouse to do business in light of redemption.
"What does it mean to build with materials that don't cost us things?" said Garber. "Maximizing profit is not sustainable; you have to be concerned about profits and people and the planet at the same time." For Garber, this is what it means to reflect the gospel in a way that points to Christ. "Evan and Jason aren't trying to get someone to sign the Nicene Creed in order to buy lumber," says Garber.
Answering these questions has had an undeniable, and sometimes dramatic, effect on TreeHouse patrons. One patron recently entered TreeHouse wearing a disposable face mask. After a timid few minutes, she slowly took the mask off and immediately asked to speak to the owners.
"I want to thank you because I can breathe in here." The patron was unable to shop in most stores because of her extremely high chemical sensitivity. The absence of those toxins is precisely what made TreeHouse a haven for her.
Clear Air for the Common Good
But the absence of toxins is like the absence of sickness: You hardly think about them until they interfere with your life. Ballard's wife was diagnosed with cancer in February 2012. A year later, his daughter had a series of unexplainable epileptic seizures. While the cause of such ailments is so often a mystery, Ballard can't help wondering if the toxins in building materials play some destructive role.
At the least, Ballard and other environmental experts know that buildings use more energy than any other single element in human society (including the often-maligned SUVs and nuclear power plants). According to the U.S. Green Building Council, buildings account for an astonishing proportion of CO2 emissions, nearly 40 percent, as well as 72 percent of all electricity consumption. According to the U.S. Energy Information Agency, buildings—residential and commercial—accounted for more than 30 percent of all energy consumption last year.
That means that when it comes to strategizing for how to steward resources, buildings jump to the top of the list. Austin happens to be a particularly great place to strategize. And TreeHouse's leaders were recently asked to help dream of a more sustainable future.
The University of Texas in Austin recently approached TreeHouse for help with a publicly funded research project called the Pecan Street Project. A partnership between the City of Austin, Austin Energy (the municipality's provider), the University of Texas, the Austin Technology Incubator, the Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce and Environmental Defense Fund, Pecan Street is an ongoing effort to establish a sustainable energy grid in a South Austin community.
Pecan Street invited TreeHouse to help study participants change their energy consumption habits. To do that, Ballard went to the homes of people that he would never have had the opportunity to meet otherwise. On one consultation, Ballard talked over coffee about sustainable energy, then life, and then his wife's cancer. All of a sudden, a publicly funded study offered the chance to relationally advance the common good. "I don't think people have that experience at Lowe's," said Ballard.
And if Austin is a prime location for TreeHouse, Loomis and Ballard couldn't have picked a much better time, either. Austin happens to be the fastest-growing city of more than 1 million people in the United States. The director of Austin Energy, the largest public energy supplier, has approached TreeHouse to host a radio show about how homeowners can save money using fewer resources. Austin's economic interest in ecology is understandable: With a population boom, the region will inevitably look for more power, possibly building nuclear power plants that cost billions of dollars and add sizable tax burdens to citizens. But if existing Austinites learn to conserve, those costs can be delayed.
Cost avoidance is a great benefit to cities. But Ballard thinks first about sickness avoidance. "I can't prove that toxins caused my wife's cancer, or that pollutants caused my daughter's epilepsy. But I know that some peoples' [sicknesses] are. If there's one less father who has to watch his daughter have seizures . . ." Ballard doesn't finish, leaving the expected phrase it will all be worth it unspoken. Maybe the phrase sounds trite compared to what he is trying to do with TreeHouse. Or maybe he just refuses to label TreeHouse as heroic when he's only trying to obey Christ.
"He'll never be able to thank me," he says instead.
But that is the nature of Common Grace for Common Good: Things are better, sometimes without us even knowing it.
Bret Mavrich is a technology journalist based in Kansis City. He blogs at BretMavrich.com.
Comments Are Closed
Displaying 111 of 11 comments
See all comments
To buy from sweat shops and businesses that place no value on environmental destruction, is to value sweat shops and environmental destruction. Jesus clearly states that we are to seek the kingdom of God first- work is to incarnate love and service, to meet material needs, and not to 'maximize material gain'. The material is to be subservient to the 'spiritual'. In what I can see of your view, man's actions are not free choices, but dictated by 'economic law'. That is not a 'Christian' view of man." (New comment)We are called to stop sinning, to stop from acting from greed; to act in mindful, consciously loving ways: to love the creation that God gives to sustain us though minimizing pollution and non-sustainable economic activity; loving our fellow man through providing work with adequate wages, safe workplaces- and not to depend on the abstraction that is 'the marketplace' to do it. We are responsible for the choices we make.
"Roger: you seem to continually view the world through the narrow lens of your own discipline-economics- without considering the broader context in which 'economics' rests. It is the 'biosphere' that provides for man's material well-being; but that same biosphere also supports our biological life. Trees don't just provide board feet of lumber for man's 'use'-they also anchor the soil, provide habitat for other forms of life, and convert CO2 to 02 in the closed system of the earth. None of those last gifts of trees is now currently adequately figured in the 'market price' for lumber. Man's material use (economics) also does not exist apart from human psychology and choice; 'the marketplace' is nothing but an abstract term for the result of many individual choices. What individuals value is reflected in their choices. 'The marketplace' reflects no values, other than what people place in it. (cont.)
"God so loved the world;" trashing the world as the result of sin, is contrary to the gospel. Greed is contrary to the gospel. "Business as usual" is contrary to the gospel. Believing that private charity alone- in lieu of multinational, billion dollar corporations- is enough to care for the poor- is unrealistic. Stating that free market capitalism is 'Biblical' and of the Gospel, while creation care and environmental stewardship is not- is wrong. There is no direct mention of ‘free market capitalism’ anywhere in the Bible (and aren’t you a Bible kind of guy, Rick?). I post here what I have posted in an earlier blog that was not responded to.
I really enjoyed seeing that this article was posted, and funny enough, I'd heard about Treehouse last year from a friend and she was raving about it. I wanted to point to a (very) side issue, though, when Bret wrote, "The culturally liberal enclave in a vast red state might not be the first city that comes to mind when you imagine the future of Christianity." While my comment is not a criticism per se of the writer, I wanted to point out that his statement betrays something many of us take for granted, and do so erroneously, in my opinion. I almost skated past it myself. Historically, it wasn't just that Christianity had an unlikely spread in places that exhibited loose morals. Christianity sprouted up surprisingly in the places that were "establishment," and/or affluent. After all, Constantine probably turned a few heads claiming Christ, as did Nicodemus before him. Christianity is counter to all human cultures.
Ray, the planet and all societies are under the curse of the fall until Christ returns. Christians cannot undo that curse. Only Christ at his coming has that power. Until then, Christians can do no more than alleviate some of the suffering that the curse inflicts on rebels against God. In fact, Christians will continue to suffer from that curse when we experience natural disasters and illnesses. The only part of the curse we don't suffer from along side the rebels is that which comes from our own sinfulness. Rebels will continue to inflict themselves with greater suffering because of their sin and nothing short of conversion will change that.
Ray, the Democrat talking points I referred to are the constant repetition of “the common good” which has been incorporated into most state Democratic party platforms since 2005 and has been repeated endlessly in Sojourners and in this City section. The church for the first 100 years took care of the poor OF THE CHURCH. Not the poor of the entire Roman Empire. And it was means tested. “A widow who is put on the list for support must be a woman who is at least sixty years old and was faithful to her husband. She must be well respected by everyone because of the good she has done. Has she brought up her children well? Has she been kind to strangers and served other believers humbly? Has she helped those who are in trouble? Has she always been ready to do good?” 1 Tim. 5. Those are the biblical principals. How about we apply that to welfare today? We've NEVER been called to alleviate global poverty. We were called to heal the sick through the laying on of hands as it says in the gospels.
Rick, Thanks. I guess I interpreted your observation that these young Christian men were living out "Democratic talking points" as a political inference. I agree this is irrelevant to the Gospel and share your antipathy toward the recent Christian initiatives to leverage political power rather than the power of God's Spirit. But I think you may misunderstand what the Gospel is by limiting it to devoting our attentions to "introducing people to the Savior." The Gospel certainly is that . . . but far more. The Christian church grew as it lived the Gospel as well as proclaimed it. They cared for the sick when the plague struck the Roman empire; they loved their enemies even when they were being killed; they met the needs of the poor rather than ignored and marginalized them. Christ came to restore the creation and that is a part of what these young men are doing. They are Christians in a business that seeks the good of the city and the people around them even as Jeremiah advised.
I don't get what makes the business more Christian than Lowe's or any lumber yard. Businesses are "Christian" if they deal honestly with their stake holders. Whole Foods is not more Christian than Walmart because of what it sells. It merely appeals to rich people with guilty consciences and ignores the poor. Walmart appeals to the poor. "Sustainability" is not sustainable if only the rich can afford it. And it has nothing to do with Christianity or stewardship. The reason homes use more energy is their size. The average size of homes has doubled in the past generation as Americans have become wealthier. But there is no scientific reason to think that is unsustainable.
Of course I have good intentions Ray, as I presume you do too. Why are you introducing politics, Republican/Democrat dynamics? I fear you are trying to build the Kingdom of Heaven on earth. That Dominionist fantasy is what produced the Holy Roman Empire. No matter how well intentioned our utopias they all become dystopias. The author of Hebrews says, “Here we have no continuing city, but we seek the one to come.” We, like Abraham, are “looking for the city which has foundations, whose architect and builder is God.” In the meantime we live the best lives possible but devote our attentions to introducing people to the Savior. “According to His promise we are looking for new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells.” As Jesus said, the fields are white unto harvest, but the laborers are few. “No soldier in active service entangles himself in the affairs of everyday life, so that he may please the one who enlisted him as a soldier.” Ray, do what the 12 the 70 and the 120 did.
Rick, I think you have good intentions but perhaps ought to consider the gospel that Christ proclaimed--the coming of the Kingdom was what he announced. From Genesis 3 onward, God has been working to restore his creation from people to every square inch that has been contaminated by sin. The implication of redemption is far wider and more generous and restoring health, stewarding what we were given to be stewards of, AND preaching Christ crucified and resurrected and sitting at God's right hand is all of a whole cloth. Why read out certain Christians who do ALL of this like these good men, Jim Wallis, and Democrats. The task God gave Adam to do is echoed by the task Jesus gave his disciples to do--to go and make disciples and to do all he taught which, as the Word, is the sum of the whole counsel of God. Don't make our God too small or our ranks too limited to a Republican view or any other view that is less gracious than God Himself.
Again, this is not the gospel. These are Anglican social gospel crusaders who mistake green building and sustainability for the gospel. Progressivism, sustainability, organic, radical ecology, low VOC paints, Democrat talking points IS NOT THE GOSPEL. This isn't Home Improvement Meets The Gospel. The gospel means something specific and Paul said “If we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed! As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed!” This is a huge distraction from the real gospel. And again you have to drive home the politicaly progressive slogan, “But that is the nature of Common Grace for Common Good.” Can you not (common good) stop saying (common good) that socialist, non biblical (common good) slogan? I hear it from Jim Wallis (his new book has Common Good in the title), Huffington Post, the Daily Kos, etc.